Ask a research question about Occupational Asthma. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
name: Occupational Asthma
creation_date: "2026-11-09T01:00:00Z"
category: Complex
disease_term:
preferred_term: occupational asthma
term:
id: MONDO:0022742
label: occupational asthma
synonyms:
- Asthma, Occupational
- Asthmas, Occupational
- Industrial asthma
- Occupational Asthmas
parents:
- Asthma
has_subtypes:
- name: Sensitizer-induced
display_name: Sensitizer-induced occupational asthma
description: >-
Asthma caused by immunological sensitization to an agent encountered at
work, after a latency period, and reproduced on re-exposure to that agent.
The causative agents split into high molecular weight protein allergens
(flour, enzymes, latex, animal proteins), which sensitize through
conventional IgE-mediated routes, and low molecular weight chemicals
(diisocyanates, acid anhydrides, persulfate salts, reactive dyes), which
must first haptenate a carrier protein. Only the chemical arm conforms to
the `chemical_respiratory_allergy` module, so the two arms are separate
rows below rather than being collapsed into this one.
children:
- LMW-chemical
- HMW-protein
- name: LMW-chemical
display_name: Low molecular weight chemical sensitizer-induced
description: >-
Sensitization to a reactive low molecular weight chemical, which must
haptenate a carrier protein before the immune system can recognize it.
This is the arm the `chemical_respiratory_allergy` module models, and the
haptenation chain in this entry is scoped to it.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31690384
reference_title: Occupational immunologic lung disease.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
OA can be triggered by high-molecular-weight (HMW) proteins that act as
complete allergens or by low-molecular-weight (LMW) sensitizers that act
as haptens
explanation: >-
States the hapten-versus-complete-allergen division this row and the
HMW-protein row are built on, and so why only this arm needs a
haptenation step.
children:
- Isocyanate-induced
- name: HMW-protein
display_name: High molecular weight protein allergen-induced
description: >-
Sensitization to an inhaled protein allergen — flour, enzymes, latex, or
laboratory animal proteins — which is immunogenic as supplied and needs no
haptenation step. Conventional IgE-mediated sensitization, with specific
IgE usually detectable, unlike the chemical arm. Its mechanism is not
curated here and it does not conform to
`chemical_respiratory_allergy`, whose trigger node requires a reactive
chemical; see `notes`.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:12704360
reference_title: "HLA associations with occupational sensitization to rat lipocalin allergens: a model for other animal allergies?"
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Laboratory animal allergy is a common occupational health problem
affecting between 11% and 44% of exposed researchers.
explanation: >-
Establishes this arm as a real and common cause of occupational
sensitization, distinct from the chemical sensitizers.
- name: Isocyanate-induced
display_name: Isocyanate-induced occupational asthma
description: >-
The single largest cause of sensitizer-induced occupational asthma, from
toluene, methylene diphenyl and hexamethylene diisocyanate used in
polyurethane manufacture, spray painting and foam production. Specific IgE
is detectable in only a minority of affected workers, so diagnosis rests on
the work-related pattern and specific inhalation challenge rather than on
serology.
subtype_term:
preferred_term: isocyanate induced asthma
term:
id: MONDO:0025556
label: isocyanate induced asthma
- name: Irritant-induced
display_name: Irritant-induced occupational asthma
description: >-
Asthma caused by a non-immunological irritant injury to the airway, with no
latency and no agent-specific immune memory. Includes reactive airways
dysfunction syndrome after a single high-dose exposure, and the
lower-intensity repeated-exposure form. Conforms to the
`inhaled_irritant_airway_injury` module rather than to
`chemical_respiratory_allergy`. No MONDO term covers this stratum: OLS
returns only `MONDO:0004979` asthma for `irritant induced asthma` and
nothing at all for `reactive airways dysfunction syndrome`, and
`MONDO:0022742` has no children, so the row carries no `subtype_term`.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21573916
reference_title: Occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
reactive airways dysfunction syndrome is a separate entity and a subtype
of occupational asthma
explanation: >-
Supports treating the irritant-induced form as a stratum of this disease
rather than a separate one, and names reactive airways dysfunction
syndrome as belonging to it.
- reference: PMID:31690384
reference_title: Occupational immunologic lung disease.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
RADS is defined as an asthma-like syndrome that persists for >3 months
and occurs within minutes to hours after a single exposure to a high
concentration of a respiratory irritant
explanation: >-
Gives the definition of reactive airways dysfunction syndrome, including
the absence of latency that distinguishes this stratum from the
sensitizer one.
pathophysiology:
- name: Workplace Sensitizer Haptenation of Airway Proteins
description: >-
A reactive low molecular weight chemical inhaled at the workplace binds
nucleophilic residues on airway and serum proteins, generating the
hapten-protein adduct that the immune system subsequently recognizes. This
is the step that requires the agent to be chemically reactive, and it is
why the low molecular weight agents behave differently from the protein
allergens that sensitize directly.
role: trigger
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
subtypes:
- LMW-chemical
- Isocyanate-induced
conforms_to: "chemical_respiratory_allergy#Covalent Protein Haptenation by a Low Molecular Weight Sensitizer"
locations:
- preferred_term: respiratory airway
term:
id: UBERON:0001005
label: respiratory airway
evidence:
- reference: PMID:23743149
reference_title: Characterization of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate-haptenated human serum albumin and hemoglobin.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
demonstrating increases in both number and complexity of conjugates
formed with increasing MDI concentrations
explanation: >-
Measures covalent adduct formation between the commonest causative agent
class and human protein, which is the haptenation step this node asserts.
downstream:
- target: Airway Epithelial Danger Signal Release on Workplace Exposure
description: >-
The haptenated epithelium and the reactive chemistry that produced it
elicit an innate epithelial response.
- target: Dendritic Cell Activation and Th2 Polarization
description: >-
The hapten-protein adduct is the antigen airway dendritic cells take up,
so haptenation also feeds the dendritic cell step directly.
- name: Airway Epithelial Danger Signal Release on Workplace Exposure
description: >-
The bronchial epithelium, lung fibroblasts and endothelium exposed to the
sensitizer release IL-8, IL-6 and IL-1beta, generate reactive oxygen
species, lose MUC1, and upregulate endothelial adhesion molecules. This
innate response licenses dendritic cell maturation but is not by itself
specific to a sensitizer, which is why an irritant exposure can produce a
similar picture without sensitization following.
role: amplifier
biological_scale: CELLULAR
subtypes:
- LMW-chemical
- Isocyanate-induced
conforms_to: "chemical_respiratory_allergy#Airway Epithelial Danger Signal Release"
cell_types:
- preferred_term: bronchial epithelial cell
term:
id: CL:0002328
label: bronchial epithelial cell
- preferred_term: lung fibroblast
term:
id: CL:0002553
label: fibroblast of lung
- preferred_term: endothelial cell
term:
id: CL:0000115
label: endothelial cell
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: cytokine production involved in inflammatory response
term:
id: GO:0002534
label: cytokine production involved in inflammatory response
modifier: INCREASED
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38360295
reference_title: "Identification of toxicity-induced biomarkers in human non-immune airway cells exposed to respiratory sensitizers: A mechanistic approach."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
sensitizers promoted an increase in IL-8, IL-6, and IL-1β production in
the evaluated cell types
explanation: >-
Measures the danger-signal cytokines of this node in the human airway
cell types it binds, after exposure to respiratory sensitizers.
downstream:
- target: Dendritic Cell Activation and Th2 Polarization
description: >-
Epithelial danger signals supply the maturation context that makes
antigen presentation sensitizing rather than tolerogenic.
- name: Dendritic Cell Activation and Th2 Polarization
description: >-
Airway dendritic cells take up the hapten-protein adduct, mature, and
present it in a Th2-polarizing context. This is the step that distinguishes
a workplace sensitizer from a workplace irritant, and therefore the step
that separates this entry's two main subtypes: the irritant-induced
stratum never reaches it.
role: central_effector
biological_scale: CELLULAR
subtypes:
- LMW-chemical
- Isocyanate-induced
conforms_to: "chemical_respiratory_allergy#Dendritic Cell Activation and Th2-Polarizing Antigen Presentation"
cell_types:
- preferred_term: dendritic cell
term:
id: CL:0000451
label: dendritic cell
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: antigen processing and presentation
term:
id: GO:0019882
label: antigen processing and presentation
modifier: INCREASED
evidence:
- reference: PMID:28824649
reference_title: Prediction of Chemical Respiratory and Contact Sensitizers by OX40L Expression in Dendritic Cells Using a Novel 3D Coculture System.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
OX40L expression in DCs was most consistently and significantly enhanced
by respiratory sensitizers as compared to that by skin sensitizers
explanation: >-
Supports the Th2-polarizing character of this step, and that it
discriminates respiratory sensitizers specifically.
downstream:
- target: Hapten-Specific T Cell Memory
description: >-
Presentation of the adduct by matured dendritic cells expands
hapten-specific T cells and establishes memory.
- name: Hapten-Specific T Cell Memory
description: >-
Hapten-specific T cells expand and polarize toward a type 2 profile, with
IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 and airway eosinophilia. This establishes the
immunological memory that gives sensitizer-induced occupational asthma its
defining clinical features: a latency period before onset, and reproducible
symptoms on re-exposure to that agent and not to others. Specific IgE may
accompany it but frequently does not with low molecular weight agents.
role: effector
biological_scale: CELLULAR
subtypes:
- LMW-chemical
- Isocyanate-induced
conforms_to: "chemical_respiratory_allergy#Hapten-Specific T Cell Activation and Th2 Polarization"
cell_types:
- preferred_term: T-helper 2 cell
term:
id: CL:0000546
label: T-helper 2 cell
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: T-helper 2 cell differentiation
term:
id: GO:0045064
label: T-helper 2 cell differentiation
modifier: INCREASED
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21573916
reference_title: Occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Workers with occupational asthma secondary to low molecular weight agents
may not have elevated specific IgE levels
explanation: >-
Supports only the last sentence of this node, that specific IgE is
frequently absent in this agent class. It does not evidence the T cell
expansion or the type 2 polarization, which the two items below carry.
- reference: PMID:16271432
reference_title: TDI can induce respiratory allergy with Th2-dominated response in mice.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
skin application followed by tracheal instillations of TDI led to local
and systemic Th2-dominated immune responses
explanation: >-
Evidences the type 2 polarization this node asserts, for the agent class
that causes most of this disease.
- reference: PMID:12419703
reference_title: "Cytokine fingerprinting of chemical allergens: species comparisons and statistical analyses."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
TMA-activated LNC isolated from BALB/c mice or BN rats elaborated high
levels of the Th2-type cytokines interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-13, but
relatively little of the Th1-type cytokines IL-12 or interferon gamma
explanation: >-
Evidences the type 2 cytokine profile of this node against a contact
allergen comparator, so the polarization is a measured contrast and not
an assumption.
downstream:
- target: Work-Related Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Variable Airflow Limitation
description: >-
Re-exposure at work drives the established hapten-specific response into
airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction.
- name: Irritant Injury of the Airway Epithelial Barrier
description: >-
In the irritant-induced stratum there is no haptenation and no
agent-specific memory. A reactive inhaled irritant injures the epithelium
directly, disrupting tight junctions and raising paracellular permeability,
and the resulting inflammation produces asthma without a latency period.
This is why irritant-induced occupational asthma begins within hours of a
high-dose exposure rather than after months of low-level exposure.
role: trigger
biological_scale: CELLULAR
subtypes:
- Irritant-induced
conforms_to: "inhaled_irritant_airway_injury#Airway Epithelial Junctional Barrier Failure"
cell_types:
- preferred_term: bronchial epithelial cell
term:
id: CL:0002328
label: bronchial epithelial cell
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: bicellular tight junction assembly
term:
id: GO:0070830
label: bicellular tight junction assembly
modifier: DECREASED
evidence:
- reference: PMID:32588239
reference_title: Ion transport mechanisms for smoke inhalation-injured airway epithelial barrier.
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Thermal stress or acrolein disrupted zonula occludens-1 tight junctions,
increased fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran permeability but did not
cause cell death or detachment
explanation: >-
Shows a reactive inhaled aldehyde producing junctional barrier failure
without cell death, which is the non-immune injury route of this stratum.
Graded INDIRECT because the study is of smoke inhalation injury in
airway monolayers, so the inference to irritant-induced asthma in a
worker is a step beyond what it measures.
downstream:
- target: Work-Related Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Variable Airflow Limitation
description: >-
Direct epithelial injury and the inflammation it provokes produce airway
hyperresponsiveness without an immunological sensitization step.
- name: Work-Related Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Variable Airflow Limitation
description: >-
The convergence point of both strata and the clinical disease. Airway
smooth muscle contraction, airway hyperresponsiveness and variable airflow
limitation, with the temporal pattern that defines the diagnosis: symptoms
worse at work and improving away from it. Removal from exposure does not
reliably resolve it, so this node represents a persistent state rather than
a transient response to exposure. Both strata converge here by different
routes: the sensitizer arm through hapten-specific memory, the irritant arm
through direct epithelial injury. The `conforms_to` link is true of the
sensitizer route; the irritant module's own consequence is mucociliary
clearance failure rather than asthma, so it is deliberately not named as a
second target.
role: consequence
biological_scale: ORGANISM
conforms_to: "chemical_respiratory_allergy#Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Variable Airflow Limitation"
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: smooth muscle contraction
term:
id: GO:0006939
label: smooth muscle contraction
modifier: INCREASED
locations:
- preferred_term: bronchus
term:
id: UBERON:0002185
label: bronchus
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21573916
reference_title: Occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Not all patients with occupational asthma will improve after removal from
the workplace
explanation: >-
Supports treating this node as a persistent state: the disease does not
reliably remit when the exposure stops.
downstream:
- target: Asthma symptoms with a work-related pattern
description: >-
Airflow limitation and hyperresponsiveness present clinically as
work-related asthma symptoms.
- target: Airway hyperresponsiveness
description: >-
This node is the state the methacholine or histamine challenge measures,
so the measured phenotype is its direct expression.
- target: Variable airflow limitation
description: >-
The variable component of the airflow limitation this node describes is
what serial peak flow monitoring at and away from work records.
phenotypes:
- name: Asthma symptoms with a work-related pattern
category: Clinical
description: >-
Wheeze, cough, chest tightness and breathlessness that worsen on working
days and improve away from work. The temporal relationship to work, rather
than any feature of the symptoms themselves, is what identifies the disease.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Asthma
term:
id: HP:0002099
label: Asthma
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21573916
reference_title: Occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Work-aggravated asthma and occupational asthma are two forms of asthma
causally related to the workplace
explanation: >-
Establishes that the disease is causally related to the workplace. Note
it does not evidence the temporal pattern itself, which the item below
carries.
- reference: PMID:12704360
reference_title: "HLA associations with occupational sensitization to rat lipocalin allergens: a model for other animal allergies?"
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
respiratory symptoms at work (OR, 2.96; CI, 1.64-5.37)
explanation: >-
Measures respiratory symptoms occurring at work in sensitized workers,
which is the work-related symptom pattern this phenotype describes.
- name: Airway hyperresponsiveness
category: Clinical
description: >-
Exaggerated bronchoconstrictor response to inhaled stimuli, demonstrable by
methacholine or histamine challenge, and the physiological hallmark shared
by both strata.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Airway hyperresponsiveness
term:
id: HP:0032933
label: Airway hyperresponsiveness
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17040933
reference_title: "Outcome of occupational asthma after cessation of exposure: a systematic review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
The pooled prevalence of persistent NSBHR at follow-up was 73% (95% CI
66% to 79%)
explanation: >-
Quantifies how often this phenotype persists after exposure ceases,
across 39 studies, which is why the entry treats hyperresponsiveness as
a persistent state rather than a response to current exposure.
- name: Wheezing
category: Clinical
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Wheezing
term:
id: HP:0030828
label: Wheezing
- name: Dyspnea
category: Clinical
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Dyspnea
term:
id: HP:0002094
label: Dyspnea
- name: Cough
category: Clinical
description: >-
Cough on working days, improving away from work. One of the four symptoms
the work-related pattern is recognised by, and sometimes the only one.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Cough
term:
id: HP:0012735
label: Cough
- name: Chest tightness
category: Clinical
description: >-
Chest tightness on working days, improving away from work. Named with
wheeze, cough and breathlessness in the work-related symptom pattern.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Chest tightness
term:
id: HP:0031352
label: Chest tightness
- name: Variable airflow limitation
category: Clinical
description: >-
Reduced expiratory flow that varies with exposure, documented by serial
peak expiratory flow monitoring at and away from work or by spirometry
before and after a specific inhalation challenge.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Reduced forced expiratory volume in one second
term:
id: HP:0032342
label: Reduced forced expiratory volume in one second
- name: Occupational rhinitis
category: Clinical
description: >-
Work-related rhinitis frequently accompanies, and often precedes, the lower
airway disease with the same causative agent.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Allergic rhinitis
term:
id: HP:0003193
label: Allergic rhinitis
prevalence:
- population: Adults
measure_type: UNKNOWN
notes: >-
Reported as a population attributable fraction — 16% of incident adult
asthma is attributable to occupational exposure, pooled across nine
longitudinal studies — and not as a population rate, so `rate_per_100000`
is deliberately left empty and `measure_type` is `UNKNOWN`. A PAF and a
prevalence have different denominators and must not be conflated, and
`PrevalenceMeasureEnum` has no attributable-fraction value to record this
properly. `prevalence_class` is left empty for the same reason: the
Orphanet-aligned bands are magnitudes against a population denominator, so
assigning one to a fraction of incident cases would state a rate this
record does not carry, and the qualitative tiers are defined by prevalence
thresholds this record likewise does not have. An earlier version of this
record carried a 5% figure from a general allergy review; the pooled
longitudinal estimate cited here supersedes it.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33141780
reference_title: Novel approaches in occupational asthma diagnosis and management.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Data from nine longitudinal studies showed a population attributable
fraction for the occupational contribution to incident asthma of 16%
explanation: >-
Gives the pooled population attributable fraction this record carries,
from longitudinal rather than cross-sectional data.
progression:
- phase: Latency before onset
subtype: Sensitizer-induced
notes: >-
The sensitizer stratum has a symptom-free interval between first exposure
and first symptoms, during which sensitization is established. Its length
is not fixed and is not recorded here as a number, because the cited
sources give it qualitatively. Its presence is what distinguishes this
stratum from the irritant one, where onset follows exposure within minutes
to hours.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31690384
reference_title: Occupational immunologic lung disease.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
RADS is defined as an asthma-like syndrome that persists for >3 months
and occurs within minutes to hours after a single exposure to a high
concentration of a respiratory irritant
explanation: >-
Supports this phase by contrast: it states the irritant stratum's
immediate onset, which is the absence of the latency this phase
describes.
- phase: Persistence after exposure ends
notes: >-
Removal from exposure does not end the disease in most workers. Airway
hyperresponsiveness persists in around three quarters and symptomatic
recovery occurs in under a third, and lung function continues to fall in a
followed diisocyanate cohort even after cessation. This is the phase that
makes the consequence node a persistent state rather than a response to
current exposure.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:18394133
reference_title: Inflammation and functional outcome in diisocyanate-induced asthma after cessation of exposure.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)
values decreased, with a median yearly reduction of FEV1 of 79 ml
explanation: >-
Measures continuing loss of lung function after exposure has stopped,
which is the functional content of this phase. Hyperresponsiveness
improved in the same cohort, so the phase is not uniform decline across
every measure.
- reference: PMID:17040933
reference_title: "Outcome of occupational asthma after cessation of exposure: a systematic review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
The pooled prevalence of persistent NSBHR at follow-up was 73% (95% CI
66% to 79%)
explanation: >-
Quantifies persistence of the physiological hallmark across 39 studies,
which is this phase's central claim.
genetic:
- name: Host susceptibility loci for diisocyanate asthma
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
subtype: Isocyanate-induced
notes: >-
Susceptibility to diisocyanate asthma is modified by host genotype at
several loci: HLA class II alleles and haplotypes, glutathione
S-transferase and N-acetyltransferase genotypes governing conjugation of
the reactive agent, and IL-4 receptor-alpha with CD14 polymorphisms. The
detoxification genotypes are mechanistically coherent with the chemistry of
the trigger node — a worker who conjugates the electrophile less
efficiently presents more of it to airway protein. No gene is causative;
these are modifiers of risk in exposed workers.
No external body has classified any of these gene-disease pairs, so
`gene_disease_validity` is deliberately absent rather than being assigned
here. This record states the shared mechanism; the per-gene records below
carry each locus with its own binding and its own measured association.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21325943
reference_title: Genetics of occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Genotype combinations of IL-4 receptor-α and CD14 single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) were significantly associated with diisocyanate
asthma, but only in workers exposed to hexamethylene diisocyanate
explanation: >-
Reports a host genotype association specific to diisocyanate asthma, and
specific to one agent within it, which is the susceptibility claim this
record makes.
- reference: PMID:21325943
reference_title: Genetics of occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
certain glutathione S-transferase genotypes (e.g. the GSTM1 null
genotype) and N-acetyltransferase genotypes associated with slow
acetylation phenotypes have been reported to be associated with
diisocyanate asthma
explanation: >-
Supports the detoxification arm of this record: genotypes governing
conjugation of the reactive agent modify risk, which connects host
genetics to the haptenation trigger.
- name: HLA class II association with protein allergen sensitization
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
subtype: HMW-protein
gene_term:
preferred_term: HLA-DRB1
term:
id: hgnc:4948
label: HLA-DRB1
mhc_term:
preferred_term: HLA-DR7 serotype
term:
id: MRO:0000316
label: HLA-DR7 serotype
notes: >-
In the high molecular weight arm, HLA class II type modifies the risk of
becoming sensitized at all. HLA-DR7 was associated with sensitization to
rat urinary proteins among laboratory animal workers and more strongly with
sensitization accompanied by symptoms, while HLA-DR3 was protective. This
is consistent with class II molecules controlling presentation of the
allergen to T cells. DR7 and DR3 are HLA-DRB1 serotypes, so the locus is
bound in `gene_term` and the serotype the study measured in `mhc_term`;
only the DR7 association is bound there, because the slot is single-valued
and DR3 is the protective comparator rather than this record's claim.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:12704360
reference_title: "HLA associations with occupational sensitization to rat lipocalin allergens: a model for other animal allergies?"
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
HLA-DR7 was associated with sensitization (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; CI,
1.12-2.97), respiratory symptoms at work (OR, 2.96; CI, 1.64-5.37) and,
most strongly, sensitization with symptoms (OR, 3.81; CI, 1.90-7.65)
explanation: >-
Measures the HLA class II association with occupational sensitization in
a cross-sectional cohort of exposed workers, which is this record's
claim.
- name: HLA-DQB1
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
gene_term:
preferred_term: HLA-DQB1
term:
id: hgnc:4944
label: HLA-DQB1
notes: >-
The class II locus most consistently associated with occupational asthma
across agent classes, in contrast to HLA-DRB1 in general allergic asthma.
The anhydride association below is carried at the serotype level in
`mhc_term`, because DQ5 corresponds to DQB1*05 alleles rather than to the
locus as a whole.
mhc_term:
preferred_term: HLA-DQ5 serotype
term:
id: MRO:0000289
label: HLA-DQ5 serotype
evidence:
- reference: PMID:24994462
reference_title: "HLA and asthma phenotypes/endotypes: a review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
The most common HLA haplotypes in the different asthma phenotypes are
HLA-DRB1in allergic asthma, HLA-DQB1in occupational asthma and HLA-DPB1
in aspirin-sensitive asthma
explanation: >-
Names this locus as the one most associated with occupational asthma
specifically, which is why it is recorded without a subtype scope. The
two missing spaces are the source's own typography and are quoted as
printed.
- reference: PMID:15144476
reference_title: Association of HLA-DQ5 and HLA-DR1 with sensitization to organic acid anhydrides.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
The linked alleles DQ5 (odds ratio [OR]=4.3; 95% confidence interval
[95% CI]=1.7, 11) and DR1 (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.2, 11) were more prevalent
in cases than in referents
explanation: >-
Measures the DQ5 association with sensitization to acid anhydrides, a
low molecular weight sensitizer class, in cases against exposed
referents.
- name: HLA-DRB1 haplotype in isocyanate-induced asthma
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
subtype: Isocyanate-induced
gene_term:
preferred_term: HLA-DRB1
term:
id: hgnc:4948
label: HLA-DRB1
notes: >-
The association is reported for the DRB1*15-DPB1*05 haplotype rather than
for either locus alone, so this record and the HLA-DPB1 record below cite
the same study and should be read together.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:16792590
reference_title: "HLA DRB1*15-DPB1*05 haplotype: a susceptible gene marker for isocyanate-induced occupational asthma?"
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
the allelic frequency of HLA DRB1*15-DPB1*05 in group I (10.6%) was
significantly higher than that of group II (0%, P = 0.001)
explanation: >-
Measures the haplotype frequency in workers with isocyanate-induced
asthma against exposed asymptomatic workers, which is this record's
susceptibility claim.
- name: HLA-DPB1
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
subtype: Isocyanate-induced
gene_term:
preferred_term: HLA-DPB1
term:
id: hgnc:4940
label: HLA-DPB1
notes: >-
Carried both in the DRB1*15-DPB1*05 haplotype above and independently as a
single nucleotide polymorphism association in a separate cohort.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:24709764
reference_title: Genetic variants in the major histocompatibility complex class I and class II genes are associated with diisocyanate-induced Asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
The HLA-E rs1573294 and HLA-DPB1 rs928976 SNPs were associated with an
increased risk of DA
explanation: >-
Reports a variant-level association at this locus with
diisocyanate-induced asthma. HLA-E is named in the same sentence but has
no record here, because this entry curates only the loci it can state a
mechanism for.
- name: GSTM1
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
subtype: Isocyanate-induced
gene_term:
preferred_term: GSTM1
term:
id: hgnc:4632
label: GSTM1
notes: >-
A detoxification rather than an antigen-presentation locus. The null
genotype removes a conjugation route for the electrophilic sensitizer, so a
worker who conjugates it less efficiently presents more of it to airway
protein — which is the haptenation trigger node of this entry.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21325943
reference_title: Genetics of occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
certain glutathione S-transferase genotypes (e.g. the GSTM1 null
genotype) and N-acetyltransferase genotypes associated with slow
acetylation phenotypes have been reported to be associated with
diisocyanate asthma
explanation: >-
Names the GSTM1 null genotype as associated with diisocyanate asthma,
which is this record's claim.
- name: IL4R
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
subtype: Isocyanate-induced
gene_term:
preferred_term: IL4R
term:
id: hgnc:6015
label: IL4R
notes: >-
The receptor for the type 2 cytokine the hapten-specific T cell node
produces, so this locus sits on the immune arm rather than the
detoxification arm. The reported association is for genotype combinations
with CD14, and only in hexamethylene diisocyanate-exposed workers, so it is
agent-specific within the stratum.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21325943
reference_title: Genetics of occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Genotype combinations of IL-4 receptor-α and CD14 single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) were significantly associated with diisocyanate
asthma, but only in workers exposed to hexamethylene diisocyanate
explanation: >-
Reports the association for this locus, in combination with CD14 and
restricted to one agent, which both records state.
- name: CD14
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
subtype: Isocyanate-induced
gene_term:
preferred_term: CD14
term:
id: hgnc:1628
label: CD14
notes: >-
Associated only in genotype combination with IL4R, and only in
hexamethylene diisocyanate-exposed workers. Recorded as its own locus
because the combination is not a haplotype at one locus; neither record
asserts an independent effect.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21325943
reference_title: Genetics of occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Genotype combinations of IL-4 receptor-α and CD14 single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) were significantly associated with diisocyanate
asthma, but only in workers exposed to hexamethylene diisocyanate
explanation: >-
Reports the association for this locus, in combination with IL4R and
restricted to one agent, which both records state.
- name: Genetic susceptibility is partial and no locus is causative
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
notes: >-
Recorded so the per-gene records above are not read as a sufficient
account. Only a subset of exposed workers becomes sensitized, which is the
observation that motivates looking for host genotype at all, and the
reported loci explain a minority of that variance. The functional themes
across them — antigen processing, lymphocyte activation, cytokine
regulation, oxidative-stress response — are the same two arms the records
above split on.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36276967
reference_title: "The genetics of occupational asthma development among workers exposed to diisocyanates: A systematic literature review with meta-analysis."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
only a subset of workers exposed to diisocyanates develop
diisocyanate-induced occupational asthma (diisocyanate asthma, DA),
indicating that genetic susceptibility may play a role
explanation: >-
States the premise of this whole section: exposure is necessary but not
sufficient, and host genotype is one of the reasons.
- reference: PMID:36276967
reference_title: "The genetics of occupational asthma development among workers exposed to diisocyanates: A systematic literature review with meta-analysis."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
antigen processing, lymphocyte activation, cytokine production
regulation, and response to oxidative stress
explanation: >-
Names the functional themes the associated genes fall into, which is the
two-arm division the per-gene records above are organised by.
environmental:
- name: Occupational exposure to chlorine
description: >-
Inhalation of chlorine gas, in water treatment, cleaning, pulp bleaching
and after accidental release. A representative irritant exposure for the
irritant-induced stratum: it injures the airway epithelium directly, with
no latency and no agent-specific immune memory.
exposure_term:
preferred_term: exposure to chlorine
term:
id: ECTO:9000077
label: exposure to chlorine
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Irritant Injury of the Airway Epithelial Barrier
environmental_effect: TRIGGERS
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
High-concentration irritant inhalation injures the epithelium directly,
which is the initiating event of this stratum.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33063819
reference_title: Updated review of reported cases of reactive airways dysfunction syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
A variety of agents were implicated, with chlorine or chlorine-releasing
molecules most frequently reported
explanation: >-
Establishes chlorine as the most frequently reported cause of reactive
airways dysfunction syndrome across reported cases, which is why it is
the representative exposure for this stratum.
- name: Occupational exposure to diisocyanates
description: >-
Inhalation of toluene, methylene diphenyl or hexamethylene diisocyanate in
polyurethane manufacture, spray painting, foam production and related
trades. The leading single cause of sensitizer-induced occupational asthma.
exposure_term:
preferred_term: exposure to isocyanates
term:
id: ECTO:9002153
label: exposure to isocyanates
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Workplace Sensitizer Haptenation of Airway Proteins
environmental_effect: TRIGGERS
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Workplace inhalation is the route by which the reactive chemical reaches
airway proteins and haptenates them.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21573916
reference_title: Occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Low molecular weight isocyanates are the most common compounds that
cause occupational asthma
explanation: >-
Establishes this exposure as the leading cause of the disease, and so
as a trigger of the haptenation step it is linked to.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21573916
reference_title: Occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Low molecular weight isocyanates are the most common compounds that cause
occupational asthma
explanation: >-
Supports recording diisocyanate exposure as the principal causative
exposure for this disease.
diagnosis:
- name: Spirometry with serial peak flow monitoring
description: >-
Spirometry, with serial peak expiratory flow records kept at and away from
work, is how the work-related pattern of airflow limitation is documented
in practice. It establishes that airflow limitation varies with exposure;
it does not identify the causative agent.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: Spirometry
term:
id: NCIT:C85397
label: Spirometry
- name: Specific inhalation challenge
description: >-
Controlled exposure of the patient to the suspected workplace agent, with
spirometry before and after. The only test that identifies the causative
agent, and so the gold standard, but rarely performed — which is why most
diagnoses rest on the clinical and temporal pattern instead.
notes: >-
No NCIT term is bound. Searched OLS (`ontology=ncit`) for
`inhalation challenge`, which returns nothing; `provocation`, which returns
only dosage-form classes for provocation-test preparations; and
`challenge test`, which returns `NCIT:C99490 Proficiency Testing
Challenge` and `NCIT:C78164 Histamine Challenge Test`. The last is a
non-specific bronchial provocation test with histamine, a different
procedure from challenge with the patient's own workplace agent, so
binding it would assert the wrong test.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21573916
reference_title: Occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
The gold standard test, specific inhalation challenge, is rarely used.
explanation: >-
Supports that specific inhalation challenge is seldom used in practice.
- reference: PMID:33652998
reference_title: "Pulmonary Function Testing in Work-Related Asthma: An Overview from Spirometry to Specific Inhalation Challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
specific inhalation challenge (SIC) is considered as the reference
standard
explanation: >-
Establishes this procedure as the reference standard for confirming the
causative agent, which is the claim this row makes.
- name: Airway inflammation measurement during specific inhalation challenge
description: >-
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide and induced sputum eosinophil count,
measured before and after a specific inhalation challenge. Neither
identifies the agent; both raise the yield of the challenge, because a
positive challenge can show a rise in one without the other.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: Nitric Oxide Measurement
term:
id: NCIT:C112360
label: Nitric Oxide Measurement
notes: >-
The bound term covers only the nitric oxide half of this row; NCIT has no
single term for the paired measurement, and the sputum eosinophil count is
carried in the `biochemical` section instead. Thresholds are quoted rather
than recorded as `reference_ranges`, because they are challenge-response
cut-offs for a change from baseline, not clinical normal intervals for a
single value.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39726396
reference_title: Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Sputum Eosinophils Are Complementary Tools for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Increases in FeNO level ≥ 13 ppb and sputum eosinophils ≥ 1.25% were
identified as the optimal threshold values for differentiating positive
from negative SICs
explanation: >-
Gives both cut-offs, derived in 321 workers undergoing challenge, which
is what makes this a usable diagnostic adjunct rather than a descriptive
measurement.
- reference: PMID:39726396
reference_title: Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Sputum Eosinophils Are Complementary Tools for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Combining either a rise in FeNO ≥ 13 ppb or an increase in sputum
eosinophils ≥ 1.25% increased the sensitivity to 77%
explanation: >-
Supports the complementarity this row asserts: the two measurements
together detect more positive challenges than either alone.
biochemical:
- name: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide
biomarker_term:
preferred_term: fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)
term:
id: NCIT:C695
label: Nitric Oxide
notes: >-
Nitric oxide in exhaled breath, raised in type 2 airway inflammation. In
this disease it is read as a change across a specific inhalation challenge
rather than as an absolute level.
The bound term is the analyte, not the measurement; NCIT has no term for
the fractional exhaled fraction itself, and `NCIT:C112360 Nitric Oxide
Measurement` is a procedure rather than a biomarker, so it is bound on the
`diagnosis` row instead. No LOINC code is bound: this entry has not been
through the LOINC cache-seeding step, and a label typed from memory is
what that step exists to prevent.
readouts:
- target: Hapten-Specific T Cell Memory
relationship: READOUT_OF
direction: POSITIVE
endpoint_context: DIAGNOSTIC
interpretation: >-
A rise across challenge reports the type 2 response this node
describes. It does not identify the sensitizer, and it is specific but
insensitive, so a flat FeNO does not exclude a positive challenge.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39726396
reference_title: Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Sputum Eosinophils Are Complementary Tools for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Increases in FeNO level ≥ 13 ppb and sputum eosinophils ≥ 1.25% were
identified as the optimal threshold values for differentiating positive
from negative SICs
explanation: >-
Establishes the measured link between a rise in this marker and a
positive challenge, which is what this readout claims.
- name: Induced sputum eosinophil count
biomarker_term:
preferred_term: sputum eosinophil percentage
term:
id: NCIT:C64550
label: Eosinophil Count
notes: >-
Eosinophil percentage in induced sputum, the direct cellular counterpart of
the airway eosinophilia the hapten-specific T cell node produces.
The bound term is the generic count; NCIT has no sputum-specific
eosinophil count term, and the specimen is carried in `preferred_term` and
in this record's name. No LOINC code is bound, for the reason given on the
FeNO record.
readouts:
- target: Hapten-Specific T Cell Memory
relationship: READOUT_OF
direction: POSITIVE
endpoint_context: DIAGNOSTIC
interpretation: >-
A rise across challenge reports the eosinophilia this node names
directly. Discordance with FeNO in a substantial minority of positive
challenges is why both are measured rather than either.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39726396
reference_title: Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Sputum Eosinophils Are Complementary Tools for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Combining either a rise in FeNO ≥ 13 ppb or an increase in sputum
eosinophils ≥ 1.25% increased the sensitivity to 77%
explanation: >-
Supports reading this marker alongside FeNO rather than instead of it,
which is what the interpretation states.
treatments:
- name: Removal from exposure
description: >-
Ending exposure to the causative agent is the definitive intervention, and
the earlier it happens the better the outcome. It is not reliably curative:
a substantial proportion of workers have persistent asthma and persistent
airway hyperresponsiveness years after leaving the exposure, which is why
the consequence node is modelled as a persistent state.
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Therapeutic Procedure
term:
id: NCIT:C49236
label: Therapeutic Procedure
target_mechanisms:
- target: Work-Related Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Variable Airflow Limitation
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Removing the causative exposure withdraws the driver of the airway
response, though it does not reverse established disease in every worker.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21573916
reference_title: Occupational asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Not all patients with occupational asthma will improve after removal from
the workplace
explanation: >-
Supports that removal is not reliably curative. The two items below
carry the controlled comparison and the quantified persistence.
- reference: PMID:23407122
reference_title: "Management of sensitizer-induced occupational asthma: avoidance or reduction of exposure?"
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
complete removal from exposure resulted in the best outcome in terms of
symptoms, lung function, and airway hyper-responsiveness. Reduction of
exposure appeared to be less effective in terms of improving asthma but
was also less likely to result in loss of income or unemployment
explanation: >-
Supports removal as the most effective intervention on clinical
outcomes, against reduction of exposure as the comparator, and carries
the trade-off in the same sentence: the clinically better option is the
one more likely to cost the worker their job.
- reference: PMID:17040933
reference_title: "Outcome of occupational asthma after cessation of exposure: a systematic review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
The pooled prevalence of persistent NSBHR at follow-up was 73%
explanation: >-
Quantifies how often airway hyperresponsiveness persists after exposure
ends, which is why this treatment is described as definitive but not
reliably curative. Graded PRIMARY_RESULT because the pooled estimate is
this review's own computation over 39 studies, not a figure it is
restating.
- reference: PMID:17040933
reference_title: "Outcome of occupational asthma after cessation of exposure: a systematic review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Reported rates of symptomatic recovery varied from 0% to 100%, with a
pooled estimate of 32%
explanation: >-
Gives the complement of the persistence figure above: fewer than a third
of workers recover symptomatically even after exposure ends, which is
the measured basis for calling removal definitive but not curative.
- name: Workplace exposure elimination as primary prevention
description: >-
Removing or substituting the sensitizer in the workplace so that workers
are never exposed. This is a different intervention from the removal row
above, which withdraws an already-affected worker: this one prevents the
disease arising at all, and the evidence for it is the strongest in the
field. Powder-free low-protein natural rubber latex gloves are the worked
case, where substitution was followed by a sharp fall in new
sensitization.
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Therapeutic Procedure
term:
id: NCIT:C49236
label: Therapeutic Procedure
notes: >-
No NCIT term for a workplace engineering or substitution control was
found. Searched OLS (`ontology=ncit`) for `exposure elimination`, which
returns nothing, and `substitution`, which returns chemical and genetic
substitution classes rather than a clinical action, so the generic
therapeutic procedure term is bound and the specificity is carried in
`preferred_term` on this row's name and description. The row is a
population-level intervention rather than a patient-level one, which the
schema has no separate slot for.
target_mechanisms:
- target: Workplace Sensitizer Haptenation of Airway Proteins
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Eliminating the agent from the workplace removes the reactive chemical
that haptenates airway protein, so the chain never starts. This is why
the intervention is preventive rather than therapeutic.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:22654083
reference_title: "Primary prevention: exposure reduction, skin exposure and respiratory protection."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Exposure elimination is the strongest and preferred primary preventive
approach to reduce the burden of occupational asthma
explanation: >-
States the conclusion of a systematic review of 29 studies, and is the
basis for recording this as a distinct intervention rather than folding
it into removal from exposure.
- reference: PMID:22654083
reference_title: "Primary prevention: exposure reduction, skin exposure and respiratory protection."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
There is strong evidence to recommend not using powdered allergen-rich
natural rubber latex gloves
explanation: >-
Gives the one agent-specific recommendation the review grades as strong,
which is the substitution the next item measures.
- reference: PMID:21775898
reference_title: Prevention of IgE Sensitization to Latex in Health Care Workers After Reduction of Antigen Exposures.
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
After the intervention, new latex sensitization rates declined 16-fold,
and 25% of previously sensitized employees reverted to negative skin
tests
explanation: >-
Measures the effect of the substitution in a health care worker cohort,
which turns the recommendation above into an interventional result. Note
it measures sensitization, not asthma, so the step to disease prevention
is an inference.
- name: Anti-inflammatory asthma pharmacotherapy
description: >-
Management of the airway inflammation alongside removal from exposure,
with inhaled corticosteroid and bronchodilator therapy as in asthma
generally. It treats the established airway disease and does nothing about
the sensitization or the exposure, so it is adjunctive to removal rather
than an alternative to it.
therapeutic_modality: SMALL_MOLECULE
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Pharmacotherapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15986
label: Pharmacotherapy
target_mechanisms:
- target: Work-Related Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Variable Airflow Limitation
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Anti-inflammatory therapy reduces the airway inflammation that sustains
hyperresponsiveness and airflow limitation.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:15579371
reference_title: Occupational exposures as triggers of asthma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Early diagnosis, adequate management of inflammation, and prevention of
further exposure are essential to occupational asthma management.
explanation: >-
Names management of inflammation as an essential component of treatment,
alongside the prevention of further exposure that the other row covers.
notes: >-
No specific agent is bound in `therapeutic_agent`. The cited review states
that inflammation must be managed but names no drug or class, and this
entry does not assert a particular agent on its authority.
notes: >-
Scope and the lump decision. This entry covers occupational asthma as the
field defines it, both the sensitizer-induced and the irritant-induced
stratum, because the name covers both and an entry named for the whole
concept must model both. The two strata have genuinely different
mechanisms — one immunological with latency, one not — so the pathophysiology
nodes are scoped with `subtypes` and conform to different modules:
the sensitizer chain to `chemical_respiratory_allergy`, the irritant node to
`inhaled_irritant_airway_injury`. They converge at the shared consequence
node. This entry is therefore the place in the KB where those two modules
meet, which is the clinical reality: the same workplace chemical can irritate
and sensitize.
Work-aggravated asthma is excluded, and the entry is therefore narrower than
the term it binds. MONDO:0022742 is defined, from MeSH, as "Asthma attacks
caused, triggered, or exacerbated by OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE", so exacerbation
of pre-existing asthma falls inside the bound concept. This entry
deliberately covers only the caused forms, on the ground that exacerbation of
existing disease is severity modification rather than a disease with an
occupational cause, and its mechanism is the pre-existing asthma's. The
field supports the distinction even though the bound term does not:
PMID:26024347 defines work-exacerbated asthma as "asthma that is made worse,
but was not initially caused, by workplace conditions", and places it beside
occupational asthma under the wider umbrella of work-related asthma rather
than inside occupational asthma. Note that PMID:21573916, cited elsewhere in
this entry, groups the two together as "two forms of asthma causally related
to the workplace" and applies "separate entity" to reactive airways
dysfunction syndrome, which this entry *includes* — so that review is not
the authority for this exclusion, and an earlier version of this note
wrongly said it was.
One recognised phenotype is not modelled at all: the occupational
asthma–COPD overlap. PMID:33141780 lists it alongside the HMW, LMW and
irritant-induced phenotypes, and it has neither a subtype row nor a
pathophysiology node here. Adding it would need a decision about where
fixed airflow obstruction sits relative to this entry and to COPD, which is
not taken here.
High molecular weight protein allergens are in scope as a cause but are not
modelled mechanistically. Flour, enzymes, latex and animal proteins cause
sensitizer-induced occupational asthma through conventional IgE-mediated
sensitization with no haptenation step, so they do not conform to
`chemical_respiratory_allergy`, whose trigger node requires a reactive
chemical. Curating that arm needs its own nodes and is not done here. It has
its own `has_subtypes` row (`HMW-protein`) carrying what this entry does
say about it, and the haptenation chain is scoped to `LMW-chemical` rather
than to the whole sensitizer stratum, so that nothing in the pathograph
asserts haptenation for a flour or enzyme worker.
The irritant stratum is declared and curated more thinly than the sensitizer
one. It has one pathophysiology node against the sensitizer arm's four, one
exposure (chlorine) against that arm's diisocyanates, and no phenotype,
treatment or biomarker row scoped to it — every phenotype and treatment row
here is either stratum-neutral or carries the sensitizer arm's evidence, the
two inflammatory biomarkers read out a sensitizer-arm node, and of the two
progression phases only the latency one is stratum-scoped, to the sensitizer
side. Every bound susceptibility locus is likewise a sensitizer-arm record;
no host-genotype modifier of irritant-induced disease is recorded, which may
be a real absence in the literature rather than a gap in this entry. The stratum itself
is sourced: the `Irritant-induced` subtype row carries the reactive airways
dysfunction syndrome definition from PMID:31690384 and the subtype claim from
PMID:21573916, and the chlorine exposure carries PMID:33063819, the RADS case
review that makes chlorine its most frequently reported cause. What the
mechanism node lacks is a human source of its own: its evidence is a smoke
inhalation injury study whose agents are thermal stress and acrolein, graded
INDIRECT because the step from an airway monolayer to asthma in a worker is
an inference. Closing that asymmetry — a stratum-scoped phenotype row, a
human irritant-injury source on the node — is the main outstanding work on
this entry.
No GeneReviews baseline applies. This is an acquired environmental disease,
not a Mendelian one, so the GeneReviews step of the curation workflow does
not apply; `just check-genereviews` is the verification.
Deep research results are used as seeds for research; they do not undergo the same validation as the main records and may contain errors. How we use deep research.
Review round 1: fix a false source claim, rescope subtypes, add deep-research evidence · 2026-11-09T01:27:24Z · View source
Second pass on the entry created in the preceding record, folding in an independent red-team review and the OpenScientist deep-research run (research/Occupational_Asthma-deep-research-openscientist.md) that were in flight when that record was written. The report had no reference_validation frontmatter, so validation was retro-fitted with validate-references: 41 of 41 citations resolved, 0 unresolved, 0 off topic. Every snippet adopted from it was then cached and exact-substring checked individually. Corrections to false or unevidenced claims. The notes paragraph justifying the work-aggravated asthma exclusion misread PMID:21573916, which in fact groups work-aggravated asthma with occupational asthma as two forms causally related to the workplace and applies 'separate entity' to reactive airways dysfunction syndrome, which this entry includes. Rewritten to cite PMID:26024347, which does define work-exacerbated asthma as made worse but not initially caused by work, and to record that MONDO:0022742's MeSH definition ('caused, triggered, or exacerbated') is broader than this entry, so the entry is deliberately narrower than its bound term. The Hapten-Specific T Cell Memory node asserted Th2 expansion and polarization with only an IgE-absence quote under it; PMID:16271432 and PMID:12419703 added, since conformance is not inheritance and the entry must carry its own evidence. Subtype rescoping. The haptenation chain was scoped to the whole Sensitizer-induced stratum while the entry's own text says high molecular weight protein allergens sensitize without haptenation, so the pathograph asserted haptenation for flour and enzyme workers. Added LMW-chemical and HMW-protein subtype rows under Sensitizer-induced and rescoped the four sensitizer nodes to LMW-chemical, with PMID:31690384 for the hapten versus complete allergen division. Prevalence corrected: the 5 percent figure from a general allergy review is superseded by a 16 percent population attributable fraction pooled across nine longitudinal studies (PMID:33141780). Irritant stratum strengthened: the chlorine exposure's review_notes waiver is replaced by real evidence (PMID:33063819, chlorine most frequently reported in RADS cases), and the RADS definition added (PMID:31690384). Other additions: a genetic section with diisocyanate susceptibility loci including the GSTM1 null genotype that ties host detoxification to the haptenation trigger (PMID:21325943) and HLA-DR7 in the protein-allergen arm (PMID:12704360); a pharmacotherapy treatment row (PMID:15579371); Cochrane and prognosis evidence on removal from exposure (PMID:23407122, PMID:17040933, 73 percent persistent airway hyperresponsiveness); the specific inhalation challenge reference-standard citation (PMID:33652998); the diagnosis row split into spirometry and specific inhalation challenge, the latter with the NCIT searches recorded since no term fits; three cell types bound on the epithelial node where one was bound but three were described; conforms_to declared on the convergence node; synonyms replaced with MONDO's own, since the previous list named this entry's own subtypes and included work-related asthma, which the entry excludes. The truncated acrolein snippet, which dropped its own subject, was fixed in this entry and in the inhaled_irritant_airway_injury module where it originated, and graded INDIRECT here. Recorded as not modelled: the occupational asthma-COPD overlap phenotype, and the mechanism of the protein-allergen arm. Conformance is now 6 links, 5 sharing a GO term with the module node. All gates pass: schema, terms, 37 snippets and 37 titles with zero issues across both files, and the offline KB gates including cross-file snippet grading.
Create: Occupational Asthma · 2026-11-09T01:10:29Z · View source
Created to give the chemical_respiratory_allergy module its first conformer (dismech#16878). Bound to MONDO:0022742. Duplicate preflight run across all three surfaces: no KB entry on origin/main holds MONDO:0022742 (Asthma, Byssinosis and Formaldehyde_Poisoning mention occupational asthma only in snippets or notes, and Byssinosis explicitly distinguishes itself from it), and no open PR or issue curates it. Scope decision: the entry covers both the sensitizer-induced and the irritant-induced stratum, because a patient can have irritant-induced occupational asthma with no sensitization, so an entry named for the whole concept cannot model only the immune route. The two strata have different mechanisms, so pathophysiology nodes are scoped with the subtypes foreign key and conform to two different modules - the four-node sensitizer chain to chemical_respiratory_allergy and the barrier-injury node to inhaled_irritant_airway_injury - converging at a shared consequence node. Isocyanate-induced is a child subtype carrying MONDO:0025556. The irritant-induced row carries no subtype_term: OLS returns only MONDO:0004979 asthma for 'irritant induced asthma'. Work-aggravated asthma is excluded as not caused by work. High molecular weight protein allergens are in scope as a cause but not modelled, since they sensitize without haptenation and so cannot conform to a module whose trigger node requires a reactive chemical. The prevalence record carries no rate_per_100000: the 5 percent figure is a share of adult asthma, not a population rate. check_conformance_content reports 5 links, 4 sharing a GO term with their module node and 1 anchor_no_process at the haptenation node, whose module counterpart binds no GO term by design because GO has no haptenation class. check_genereviews_baseline reports NO_CHAPTER for both collections, verifying the notes claim that no GeneReviews baseline applies. Schema, term and reference validation pass with 12 snippets and 12 titles and zero issues, as do the offline KB gates including cross-file snippet grading. An OpenScientist deep-research run on the disorder and an independent red-team review were in flight when this record was written; whatever they change will be recorded in a second record.
MONDO:0022742 · ICD-11 CA23 (asthma, occupational) · ICD-10 J45 (+ external-cause codes; J68.3 for irritant/RADS) · MeSH "Asthma, Occupational" · no OMIM / no single Mendelian causal gene
Causal gene — stated up front, per instructions: Occupational asthma has no single Mendelian causal gene. It is a complex, polygenic, environmentally-caused disease in which an occupational inhalational exposure (sensitizer or irritant) is the necessary cause and host genetics act as susceptibility modifiers. The dominant susceptibility loci are the HLA class II genes on chromosome 6p21 — principally HLA-DQB1 (with agent-specific haplotypes such as HLA-DRB1*15–DPB1*05 for isocyanates and HLA-DQ5/DQB1*0501 + DR1 for acid anhydrides), together with non-HLA modifiers in oxidative-stress and antigen-processing pathways (GSTM1, GSTP1, CTNNA3, NAT1/2, TNF). This is a disease defined by its environmental cause plus a polygenic HLA-centred susceptibility background — not by a causal gene.
Occupational asthma (OA) is a complex, environmentally-caused, adult-onset form of asthma defined by variable airflow limitation and/or airway hyperresponsiveness attributable to causes in the working environment. The necessary cause of OA is workplace exposure — more than 400 agents are documented — acting upon a polygenic susceptibility background centred on the HLA class II region (principally HLA-DQB1, with agent-specific haplotypes), supplemented by non-HLA modifier genes in antigen-processing, lymphocyte-activation, cytokine-regulation, and oxidative-stress pathways (e.g., GSTM1/GSTP1, CTNNA3, NAT, TNF). OA is therefore categorized as a complex gene–environment disease, not a monogenic disorder.
OA is epidemiologically substantial: pooled longitudinal data attribute ~16–17% of adult-onset asthma to occupational exposures (population attributable fraction). It presents in two mechanistically distinct forms. Sensitizer-induced (allergic) OA follows a latency period of exposure and is driven either by high-molecular-weight (HMW, >10 kDa) complete protein allergens (flour/grain glycoproteins, enzymes/α-amylase, latex, animal danders, molds) or by low-molecular-weight (LMW) chemical haptens (isocyanates, acid anhydrides, platinum salts, persulfates, quaternary ammonium compounds) that conjugate to airway proteins to form neoantigens; both converge on an HLA class II → CD4⁺ Th2 (IL-4/IL-5/IL-13) → IgE / eosinophilic airway inflammation axis. Irritant-induced asthma, including reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS), is a separate non-immunologic entity caused by direct epithelial injury after high-level irritant exposure (classically chlorine, ammonia, acid fumes), characteristically without a latency period or specific immune sensitization.
Diagnosis is confirmed by specific inhalation challenge (SIC), the reference standard, supported by spirometry, non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness testing, serial peak flow (OASYS), specific IgE, and the complementary inflammatory biomarkers FeNO and sputum eosinophils. Prognosis is frequently poor: only ~32% symptomatic recovery after exposure cessation, with persistent non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness in ~73%. Complete removal from exposure gives the best clinical outcome but the worst socioeconomic outcome (income/job loss), the central management trade-off. Primary prevention by exposure elimination/reduction is the single most effective intervention, with powder-free low-protein latex gloves providing landmark proof-of-principle. This report synthesizes 12 confirmed findings and 53 reviewed papers across all 15 requested disease-characteristic domains.
Occupational asthma is asthma caused by workplace conditions. It is subdivided into sensitizer-induced (allergic) OA and irritant-induced (non-allergic) OA; together with work-exacerbated asthma (WEA) — pre-existing asthma made worse but not initially caused by work — these constitute the umbrella category work-related asthma (WRA). More than 400 workplace agents are implicated. The recognized disease phenotypes are: OA caused by HMW agents, OA caused by LMW agents, irritant-induced asthma, and an OA–COPD overlap phenotype.
As the review by Lemière and colleagues states: "OA is asthma caused by workplace conditions, and is subdivided into sensitizer-induced (allergic) OA and irritant-induced (nonallergic) OA. WEA is asthma that is made worse, but was not initially caused, by workplace conditions" (PMID: 26024347). The phenotypic subdivision is confirmed by Vandenplas et al.: "The main phenotypes of occupational asthma are: occupational asthma caused by high-molecular-weight (HMW) or low-molecular-weight (LMW) agents, irritant-induced asthma and occupational asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap" (PMID: 33141780). Evidence source: human clinical / aggregated disease-level reviews.
Pooled data from nine longitudinal studies yielded a population attributable fraction (PAF) of 16% for the occupational contribution to incident asthma: "Data from nine longitudinal studies showed a population attributable fraction for the occupational contribution to incident asthma of 16%" (PMID: 33141780). This is independently corroborated by the population-based Telemark 5-year cohort (n=7120), in which new-onset asthma incidence was 7.5 per 1000 person-years, ever exposure to vapour/gas/dust/fumes (VGDF) carried an odds ratio of 1.49 (95% CI 1.15–1.94) with a clear exposure–response (daily exposure OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.39–4.35): "The corresponding PAF for ever exposed to VGDF was 17% (95% CI 5.4% to 27.8%) and the risk of asthma onset increased with frequent VGDF exposure" (PMID: 39277201). GBD-2021 analysis separately attributed 13.9% of young-adult asthma DALYs to environmental/occupational risks (PMID: 42323982). Evidence source: human epidemiological cohorts.
HMW proteins (>10 kDa) — flour/grain glycoproteins, fungal α-amylase and other enzymes, natural rubber latex, animal danders, avian and insect proteins, molds — act as complete allergens driving IgE sensitization. LMW agents — isocyanates, acid anhydrides, metals/platinum salts, quaternary ammonium compounds, persulfates — act as haptens that bind airway proteins. Only a subset of exposed workers develop disease, implicating genetic susceptibility. As Cannon et al. summarize: "OA can be triggered by high-molecular-weight (HMW) proteins that act as complete allergens or by low-molecular-weight (LMW) sensitizers that act as haptens" (PMID: 31690384). A systematic review/meta-analysis of diisocyanate asthma found: "only a subset of workers exposed to diisocyanates develop diisocyanate-induced occupational asthma (diisocyanate asthma, DA), indicating that genetic susceptibility may play a role", with associated gene functions spanning "antigen processing, lymphocyte activation, cytokine production regulation, and response to oxidative stress" (PMID: 36276967). Evidence source: human clinical + genetic meta-analysis.
Diagnosis combines clinical history, spirometry/bronchodilator responsiveness, non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness testing, specific IgE, serial peak-flow analysis (OASYS), and SIC as the reference standard: "specific inhalation challenge (SIC) is considered as the reference standard and represents the best way to confirm the specific cause of WRA" (PMID: 33652998). Specific IgE performance differs by agent class — for HMW agents sensitivity ~0.74/specificity ~0.71, for LMW agents sensitivity 0.28/specificity 0.89. A systematic review of 39 studies (1681 patients) quantified the poor prognosis: "Reported rates of symptomatic recovery varied from 0% to 100%, with a pooled estimate of 32% (95% CI 26% to 38%)" and "The pooled prevalence of persistent NSBHR at follow-up was 73% (95% CI 66% to 79%)" (PMID: 17040933). Severity at diagnosis and airway inflammation predict persistence; early diagnosis and removal improve outcome. Evidence source: human clinical / systematic review.
HLA-DQB1 is the haplotype most associated with occupational asthma, in contrast to HLA-DRB1 in general allergic asthma and HLA-DPB1 in aspirin-sensitive asthma: "The most common HLA haplotypes in the different asthma phenotypes are HLA-DRB1 in allergic asthma, HLA-DQB1 in occupational asthma and HLA-DPB1 in aspirin-sensitive asthma" (PMID: 24994462). Agent-specific associations have been mapped:
| Sensitizer | HLA / genetic association | Effect size | PMID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) | DRB1*15–DPB1*05 haplotype | 10.6% cases vs 0% exposed-asymptomatic, P=0.001 | 16792590 |
| Diisocyanates (MHC SNPs) | HLA-E rs1573294 | OR 6.27 (2.37–16.6) | 24709764 |
| Diisocyanates | HLA-DOA rs3128935 | OR 19.69 | 24709764 |
| Acid anhydrides (HHPA/MHHPA) | HLA-DQ5 / DQB1*0501 | OR 4.3 (1.7–11) | 15144476 |
| Acid anhydrides | HLA-DR1 | OR 3.0 (1.2–11) | 15144476 |
| Detergent enzyme (subtilisin) | HLA-DQ8 (predisposing) | transgenic mouse | 16185928 |
Notably, DQB1*0501 is protective for isocyanate/plicatic-acid asthma while predisposing for anhydride sensitization, illustrating agent-specific allele effects. Non-HLA modifiers include glutathione-S-transferase genes (GSTM1/GSTP1), CTNNA3, NAT, and TNF, acting in oxidative-stress and antigen-processing pathways. Direct quotes: "the allelic frequency of HLA DRB1*15-DPB1*05 in group I (10.6%) was significantly higher than that of group II (0%, P = 0.001)" (PMID: 16792590); "The linked alleles DQ5 (odds ratio [OR]=4.3; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=1.7, 11) and DR1 (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.2, 11) were more prevalent in cases than in referents" (PMID: 15144476); "The HLA-E rs1573294 and HLA-DPB1 rs928976 SNPs were associated with an increased risk of DA" (PMID: 24709764). Evidence source: human genetic association studies.
LMW agents such as diisocyanates react with biological nucleophiles to form diisocyanate-adducted (hapten–carrier) biomolecules that act as neoantigens: "The importance of diisocyanate-adducted biomolecules will be emphasized and their potential contributions to pathogenesis discussed" (PMID: 11811926). Sensitization is associated with recruitment of CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and Th2 cytokine production: "The diisocyanate-induced sensitization, is associated with the recruitment of CD4 T lymphocytes to the lungs and the production of Th2-type cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13" (PMID: 22774468). A Wistar rat TDI-vapor model confirmed eosinophilic Th2 inflammation: "marked infiltration of eosinophils in the TDI-exposed rats. The cytokine assay showed that IL-4 and IL-5 were predominantly produced in the BAL fluid in vivo" (PMID: 24570807). Prevalence of diisocyanate asthma among exposed workers is ~5–15%. Evidence source: human clinical mechanism + rodent model.
A systematic review of 29 studies concluded: "Exposure elimination is the strongest and preferred primary preventive approach to reduce the burden of occupational asthma" and "There is strong evidence to recommend not using powdered allergen-rich natural rubber latex gloves" (PMID: 22654083). Interventional proof-of-principle comes from a health-care-worker cohort: "After the intervention, new latex sensitization rates declined 16-fold, and 25% of previously sensitized employees reverted to negative skin tests" (PMID: 21775898); pre-intervention sensitization was dose-dependent on airborne latex antigen (low 2%, intermediate 8%, high 16%, P<0.0001). Germany's nationwide switch to low-protein powder-free gloves produced a steady decline in reported occupational latex allergy cases after 1998 (PMID: 12170275). Management of established disease centres on complete cessation of exposure plus standard asthma pharmacotherapy (inhaled corticosteroids ± bronchodilators; type-2 biologics — omalizumab, mepolizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab — by extrapolation from severe type-2 asthma). Evidence source: human clinical / interventional + ecological.
Validated models include the Wistar rat exposed to TDI vapor (airway hyperresponsiveness, eosinophilic inflammation, IL-4/IL-5 in BAL); murine models of diisocyanate asthma, preferred for defined genome and reagent availability ("Murine models of diisocyanate-induced asthma have proved to be the most useful", PMID: 22774468); guinea pig and swine models of trimellitic anhydride ("Animal models revealed sIgG, sIgE, sIgA, and sIgM along with pulmonary lesions, cellular infiltrates, alveolar hemorrhage, and pneumonitis associated with TMA exposure", PMID: 32594360); and HLA-DQ8 / HLA class II transgenic mice reproducing detergent-enzyme hypersensitivity: "The DQ8 mice also developed allergic eosinophilic inflammatory reactions in the airways following intranasal instillations of this enzyme" (PMID: 16185928). Evidence source: model organism studies.
Risk of sensitizer-induced OA rises with exposure intensity and duration and with host atopy. A florist study (n=128) found work-related asthma-like symptoms in 14.1%, with "The most prominent risk factors in florists were work intensity, work duration, and specific atopy" (PMID: 15189959); specific odds ratios were high work intensity OR 7.3 (1.1–51.8), long duration OR 5.1 (1.2–21.6), specific flower atopy OR 5.9 (1.4–24.3), and notably "excess risk for work-related asthma-like symptoms among those with allergic rhinitis (OR, 13.2; 95% CI, 3.1 to 56.4)" and conjunctivitis OR 8.4 (2.4–29.2). A pooled laboratory-animal-worker study (n=650) demonstrated the exposure–response for sensitization: "the likelihood of IgE-mediated sensitization increases with increasing exposure" (PMID: 10200019). Rhinitis frequently precedes/accompanies OA. Smoking is a risk factor for IgE sensitization to some HMW agents (platinum salts, anhydrides). Evidence source: human epidemiological studies.
A multicenter study (n=321 undergoing SIC, 156 positive) found post-challenge rises in FeNO and sputum eosinophils had similar diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.78 and 0.81). Optimal thresholds were defined: "Increases in FeNO level ≥ 13 ppb and sputum eosinophils ≥ 1.25% were identified as the optimal threshold values for differentiating positive from negative SICs" — each ≥95% specific but of low sensitivity (55% and 62%) — and "Combining either a rise in FeNO ≥ 13 ppb or an increase in sputum eosinophils ≥ 1.25% increased the sensitivity to 77%" (PMID: 39726396). Increases were discordant in 38% of positives, indicating complementary information. Evidence source: human clinical / diagnostic accuracy study.
Irritant-induced OA is a separate non-immunologic entity. RADS is an asthma-like syndrome persisting >3 months, beginning within minutes to hours after a single high-concentration irritant exposure: "RADS is defined as an asthma-like syndrome that persists for >3 months and occurs within minutes to hours after a single exposure to a high concentration of a respiratory irritant" (PMID: 31690384). Chlorine is the most common cause: "A variety of agents were implicated, with chlorine or chlorine-releasing molecules most frequently reported" (PMID: 33063819); other documented causes include ammonia, acid fumes, lithium hydroxide dust, and β-mercaptoethanol. Unlike sensitizer-induced OA, there is no latency period and no IgE/specific immune sensitization. Chronic moderate irritant exposure can also cause irritant-induced asthma "with latency": "there is epidemiological evidence for irritant-induced asthma with latency from chronic moderate exposure" (PMID: 30661311). Diagnosis uses Brooks (1985)/ACCP 2008 criteria with methacholine challenge (e.g., PC20 1.36–6.74 mg/mL). Evidence source: human clinical / case series + reviews.
A Cochrane review of workplace interventions found: "complete removal from exposure resulted in the best outcome in terms of symptoms, lung function, and airway hyper-responsiveness. Reduction of exposure appeared to be less effective in terms of improving asthma but was also less likely to result in loss of income or unemployment" (PMID: 23407122). A follow-up of 125 sensitizer-induced OA patients (median 18 months symptom duration before referral; 79% no longer exposed at 1 year) found unexposed patients had better symptoms (82% vs 53% improved, P=0.023) but "poorer outcomes in terms of career, income and how they felt treated by their employer" (PMID: 32307530). Diagnostic delay worsens prognosis: "In adult asthmatics, work-relatedness can account for 15%-33% of cases, but delays in diagnosis remain common and lead to worse outcomes" (PMID: 30661311). Evidence source: human clinical / systematic review + cohort.
Overview. Occupational asthma is adult-onset asthma — variable airflow obstruction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and airway inflammation — caused by agents or conditions in the workplace. It is the most common occupational lung disease in industrialized countries and belongs to the broader category of work-related asthma (WRA), which comprises OA (caused by work) and work-exacerbated asthma (worsened by, but not caused by, work) (PMID: 26024347).
Key identifiers. - Mondo: MONDO:0022742 (occupational asthma) - MeSH: "Asthma, Occupational" - ICD-10: J45 (asthma) with occupational specification; J68.3 (airway disease due to chemical fumes/vapors, for irritant/RADS) - ICD-11: CA23 (asthma) with external-cause coding for occupational origin - OMIM: Not applicable — no single Mendelian causal gene (complex trait) - Orphanet: Not a classic rare-disease entry; captured under occupational respiratory disorders
Synonyms: work-related asthma; occupational allergic asthma; sensitizer-induced occupational asthma; irritant-induced asthma; reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS, for acute irritant form).
Data source type. Information is derived predominantly from aggregated disease-level resources — systematic reviews, occupational cohorts, registries (e.g., SHIELD, SWORD), and challenge-test case series — rather than from individual EHR records.
Causal factors. The primary cause is environmental (occupational inhalational exposure), acting on a genetic susceptibility background. There is no infectious etiology. More than 400 agents are implicated, divided into HMW complete allergens and LMW chemical haptens, plus irritant agents (PMID: 34031758, PMID: 31690384).
Genetic risk factors. HLA class II alleles, principally HLA-DQB1, are the dominant susceptibility loci, with agent-specific haplotypes (Finding 5). Non-HLA modifiers: GSTM1/GSTP1 (oxidative stress), CTNNA3, NAT, TNF (PMID: 36276967, PMID: 24994462).
Environmental/occupational risk factors. Exposure intensity and duration (exposure–response relationship), high-risk occupations (bakers, farmers, spray painters, isocyanate/plastics workers, health-care workers, cleaners, woodworkers, laboratory-animal workers), atopy, and smoking (for some HMW agents) (PMID: 15189959, PMID: 10200019, PMID: 22794690). Exposure–response thresholds exist for specific allergens (wheat flour 1–2.4 mg/m³, fungal α-amylase 0.25 ng/m³, latex 0.6 ng/m³, rat allergen 0.7 µg/m³) (PMID: 9645589).
Protective factors. Reduction/elimination of exposure; engineering controls; respiratory protection (limited evidence); powder-free low-protein latex gloves (PMID: 22654083). HLA-DQB1*0501 is protective for isocyanate/plicatic-acid asthma. No well-established dietary protective factor is specific to OA.
Gene–environment interactions. The defining feature of OA: identical exposures produce disease only in genetically susceptible (e.g., HLA-DQB1-defined) individuals, and only a subset of exposed workers (~5–15% for diisocyanates) develop disease (PMID: 36276967).
| Phenotype | Type | HPO term | Onset | Course | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheezing | Symptom/sign | HP:0030828 | Adult | Episodic, worse at work | Very common |
| Dyspnea | Symptom | HP:0002094 | Adult | Episodic→persistent | Very common |
| Cough | Symptom | HP:0012735 | Adult | Episodic | Common |
| Chest tightness | Symptom | HP:0004760 | Adult | Episodic | Common |
| Airway hyperresponsiveness | Functional/lab | HP:0030830 | Adult | Often persistent (~73%) | Majority |
| Airflow obstruction (↓FEV1) | Lab | HP:0002110 | Adult | Variable/progressive | Majority |
| Sputum/blood eosinophilia | Lab abnormality | HP:0001880 | Adult | Fluctuating | HMW/Th2 disease |
| Allergic rhinitis (often precedes OA) | Symptom | HP:0003193 | Adult | Episodic | Frequent comorbid |
| Conjunctivitis | Sign | HP:0000509 | Adult | Episodic | Frequent comorbid |
Characteristic feature: symptom improvement away from work (weekends/holidays) and worsening on return — the clinical hallmark of sensitizer-induced OA. Quality-of-life impact is substantial, with career disruption, income loss, and unemployment documented (PMID: 32307530).
Causal genes: None (complex disease). Susceptibility genes: HLA-DQB1 (HGNC:4944), HLA-DRB1 (HGNC:4948), HLA-DPB1 (HGNC:4940), HLA-E, HLA-DOA, HLA-DQA2; modifiers GSTM1 (HGNC:4632), GSTP1 (HGNC:4638), CTNNA3, NAT1/NAT2, TNF. Variants are germline common polymorphisms/SNPs and HLA haplotypes (not classic pathogenic Mendelian variants), classified as susceptibility alleles, not ACMG pathogenic variants. Allele frequencies are population-level HLA frequencies. Functional consequences relate to altered antigen presentation (HLA) and reduced detoxification capacity (GST null genotypes → oxidative stress). Epigenetic/chromosomal abnormalities: No recurrent chromosomal abnormality; epigenetic contributions are plausible but not yet firmly established (PMID: 36276967, PMID: 24709764).
Environmental/occupational factors. HMW: wheat/grain flour and glycoproteins, fungal/bacterial enzymes (α-amylase, subtilisin), natural rubber latex, animal danders/urinary proteins, avian proteins, molds. LMW haptens: diisocyanates (TDI, MDI, HDI; CHEBI toluene diisocyanate), acid anhydrides (trimellitic, phthalic, HHPA/MHHPA), platinum salts, persulfates (hairdressing), quaternary ammonium compounds, cleaning/disinfectant chemicals (chloramine, benzalkonium chloride). Irritants: chlorine (CHEBI:17997), ammonia (CHEBI:16134), acid fumes, lithium hydroxide dust, β-mercaptoethanol (PMID: 34031758, PMID: 34247391, PMID: 42427009).
Lifestyle factors. Smoking increases IgE sensitization to some HMW agents (platinum salts, anhydrides). Infectious agents: Not applicable — OA is non-infectious (molds and bacterial-derived enzymes act as allergens, not as infections).
Ordered causal chain — sensitizer-induced (allergic) OA:
Ordered causal chain — irritant-induced asthma / RADS:
Molecular pathways / GO terms: antigen processing and presentation via MHC class II (GO:0019886), T-helper 2 cell differentiation (GO:0045064), IL-4/IL-5/IL-13 cytokine signaling, immune response (GO:0006955), eosinophil chemotaxis (GO:0048245), response to oxidative stress (GO:0006979), inflammatory response (GO:0006954). Cell types / CL terms: CD4⁺ Th2 lymphocyte (CL:0000899), eosinophil (CL:0000771), mast cell (CL:0000097), dendritic cell (CL:0000451), bronchial epithelial cell (CL:0002328), airway smooth muscle cell (CL:0000192), B cell/plasma cell (CL:0000786). Upstream: exposure, hapten conjugation, HLA presentation. Downstream: Th2 cytokines, IgE, eosinophilia, remodeling.
WORKPLACE INHALATION EXPOSURE (>400 agents)
│
┌──────────────────────┼───────────────────────┐
│ │ │
HMW ALLERGEN LMW HAPTEN HIGH-LEVEL IRRITANT
(flour, latex, (isocyanate, (chlorine, ammonia,
enzymes, dander) anhydride, Pt) LiOH, acid fumes)
│ │ │
│ conjugates to airway │ direct toxic
complete protein → HAPTEN–CARRIER │ EPITHELIAL INJURY
allergen NEOANTIGEN │ (no latency,
│ │ │ no sensitization)
└──────────┬───────────┘ │
▼ │
HLA CLASS II (DQB1) PRESENTATION ──► CD4⁺ T cell │
│ [requires genetic susceptibility] │
▼ │
Th2 POLARIZATION │
IL-4 / IL-5 / IL-13 │
│ │
┌─────────┴─────────┐ │
▼ ▼ │
IgE class-switch EOSINOPHIL recruitment │
(mast-cell arming) + activation │
└─────────┬─────────┘ │
▼ ▼
AIRWAY INFLAMMATION, SMOOTH-MUSCLE CONTRACTION,
MUCUS, EDEMA ► VARIABLE AIRFLOW OBSTRUCTION + BHR
│
▼
CHRONIC INFLAMMATION ► AIRWAY REMODELING
│
▼
PERSISTENT / OFTEN IRREVERSIBLE ASTHMA (~73% persistent BHR,
only ~32% recover after exposure cessation)
The unifying interpretation is that OA is the paradigmatic gene–environment respiratory disease: an environmental exposure is necessary but not sufficient, with HLA-class-II-centred genetic susceptibility determining which exposed workers progress to sensitization and disease. The two sensitizer branches (HMW complete allergen; LMW hapten–carrier neoantigen) converge on a shared HLA-II → Th2 → IgE/eosinophil effector axis, while the irritant branch bypasses immunity entirely via direct epithelial toxicity. The therapeutic and preventive corollary follows directly from the causal chain: because the initiating lesion is the exposure, removing the exposure is both the most effective treatment and the only true primary prevention, yet it generates a clinical–socioeconomic trade-off that dominates real-world management.
| PMID | Title (abbrev.) | Supports finding(s) |
|---|---|---|
| 26024347 | Occupational asthma and work-exacerbated asthma | F1 (definition, WRA) |
| 33141780 | Novel approaches in OA diagnosis/management | F1, F2 (phenotypes, 16% PAF) |
| 39277201 | Telemark 5-year follow-up | F2 (17% PAF, exposure-response) |
| 31690384 | Occupational immunologic lung disease | F3, F11 (HMW/LMW, RADS) |
| 36276967 | Genetics of diisocyanate OA (meta-analysis) | F3, F5 (genetic susceptibility) |
| 33652998 | PFT in work-related asthma / SIC | F4 (SIC gold standard) |
| 17040933 | Outcome after cessation (systematic review) | F4, F12 (32% recovery, 73% BHR) |
| 24994462 | HLA and asthma phenotypes | F5 (HLA-DQB1 in OA) |
| 16792590 | DRB1*15-DPB1*05 in isocyanate OA | F5 (TDI haplotype) |
| 15144476 | HLA-DQ5/DR1 and acid anhydrides | F5 (anhydride HLA) |
| 24709764 | MHC class I/II SNPs in diisocyanate asthma | F5 (MHC SNPs) |
| 11811926 | Diisocyanate asthma immunopathogenesis | F6 (hapten–carrier adducts) |
| 22774468 | Pathogenetic aspects of diisocyanate asthma | F6, F8 (CD4⁺ Th2, mouse model) |
| 24570807 | IL-4/IL-5 in TDI-exposed Wistar rats | F6, F8 (eosinophilic Th2) |
| 22654083 | Primary prevention: exposure reduction | F7 (prevention hierarchy) |
| 21775898 | Prevention of latex IgE sensitization | F7 (16-fold reduction) |
| 12170275 | German latex prevention program | F7 (national decline) |
| 16185928 | HLA-DQ8 subtilisin hypersensitivity | F5, F8 (transgenic model) |
| 32594360 | Trimellitic anhydride animal models | F8 (TMA models) |
| 15189959 | Work-related symptoms among florists | F9 (risk factors) |
| 10200019 | Rat urinary allergen exposure-response | F9 (exposure-response) |
| 39726396 | FeNO + sputum eosinophils for OA | F10 (biomarkers) |
| 33063819 | Updated review of RADS cases | F11 (chlorine common) |
| 30661311 | Management of OA/WEA update | F11, F12 (latency, delay) |
| 23407122 | Avoidance vs reduction (Cochrane) | F12 (trade-off) |
| 32307530 | Follow-up survey of OA patients | F12 (socioeconomic burden) |
| 9383254 | Prognostic factors TDI-OA | Prognosis (early removal) |
| 18394133 | Inflammation/outcome after cessation | Prognosis (FEV1 decline) |
| 42427009 | RADS from lithium hydroxide dust | F11 (LiOH RADS) |
| 9645589 | Exposure-response thresholds | Prevention (TLVs) |
| 32007172 | Type-2 targeted therapeutics | Treatment (biologics) |
Concordance and tension. The evidence base is strongly concordant across human cohorts, systematic reviews, and animal/transgenic models. The principal internal tension is the clinical–socioeconomic trade-off (Finding 12): the intervention with the best biological outcome (complete removal) produces the worst livelihood outcome, which the literature resolves pragmatically rather than definitively. A second nuance is the agent-specific directionality of HLA alleles (DQB1*0501 protective for isocyanates yet predisposing for anhydrides), cautioning against treating "HLA susceptibility" as a single uniform risk factor.
Report compiled from 12 confirmed findings and 53 reviewed papers across all 15 disease-characteristic domains. Evidence types span human epidemiological cohorts, human clinical/diagnostic studies, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, genetic association studies, and rodent/transgenic model-organism studies.
Checked with linkml-reference-validator 0.5.1.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| References checked | 41 |
| Resolved | 41 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| References weighed for topical relevance | 41 |
| On topic | 32 |
| Off topic | 0 |
All extracted references resolved successfully.
Checked with linkml-term-validator 0.4.5, through the ols: adapter.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| Terms checked | 41 |
| Resolved | 35 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Obsolete | 1 |
| Unverifiable | 5 |
| Terms whose name was checked | 12 |
| Terms named correctly | 1 |
| Terms named as a different term | 11 |
These identifiers resolve, so nothing about them looks wrong, and the ontology calls them something unrelated to what the report calls them. That usually means the identifier is not the one the sentence needs:
HP:0030828 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Symptom/sign"; HP calls it WheezingHP:0002094 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Symptom"; HP calls it DyspneaHP:0012735 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Symptom"; HP calls it CoughHP:0004760 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Symptom"; HP calls it obsolete Congenital septal defectHP:0030830 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Functional/lab"; HP calls it CracklesHP:0002110 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Lab"; HP calls it BronchiectasisHP:0001880 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Lab abnormality"; HP calls it Increased total eosinophil countHP:0003193 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Symptom"; HP calls it Allergic rhinitisHP:0000509 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Sign"; HP calls it ConjunctivitisUBERON:0001707 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Secondary involvement: upper airway — nasal mucosa/nose"; UBERON calls it nasal cavity**NCIT:C1130 (1 mention) - the report calls it "inhaled corticosteroids"; NCIT calls it Hydroxyl RadicalThese terms are real but deprecated. Citing one is not a fabrication; it does mean the report is naming something the ontology has retired:
HP:0004760 (obsolete Congenital septal defect) (1 mention)