That background OAK check finished — small addendum to §12's treatment ontology column, three more terms now verified rather than ⚠️:
Table (click to expand)
| Term | ID | Verified |
|---|---|---|
| pharmacotherapy | MAXO:0000058 |
✅ |
| Pharmacotherapy | NCIT:C15986 |
✅ |
| Surgical Procedure | NCIT:C15329 |
✅ |
| Supportive Care | NCIT:C15747 |
✅ |
So MAXO:0000058 (pharmacotherapy) is a live alternative to NCIT:C15986 for the drug-treatment rows — heart-failure meds, antiseizure meds, thyroid replacement, antimicrobials, immunoglobulin replacement — each paired with a therapeutic_agent for the actual drug. Everything else in that table's ⚠️ column still stands: no MAXO term surfaced for IVIG specifically, for antibiotic/antifungal therapy, for cataract extraction, or for hearing aids, so those need a fresh OAK search at curation time (the MAXO search index in this repo's adapter matched only on near-exact labels, which is why several of my queries came back empty rather than genuinely absent — worth re-searching with different phrasings before concluding the terms don't exist).
Also incidental, not useful here but worth not confusing later: the same batch returned MAXO:0000765 central venous nutrition intake and MAXO:0001175 liver transplantation. Neither belongs in the Vici entry — parenteral nutrition isn't the documented feeding route (gastrostomy is), and there's no hepatic transplant indication in this disease. I only mention them so nobody sees them in the scrollback and thinks I was proposing them.