Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss 22

Key Findings

Finding 1 — DFNB22 is caused by biallelic loss-of-function of OTOA (otoancorin), a GPI-anchored inner-ear tether

OTOA (chromosome 16p12.2; OMIM 607038; disease OMIM #607039) encodes otoancorin, a ~120 kDa GPI-anchored protein. Otoancorin localizes to the interface between the apical surface of the inner-ear sensory epithelia and their overlying acellular gels. In the cochlea it marks the two attachment zones of the tectorial membrane: the permanent zone along the spiral limbus and the transient zone on the greater epithelial ridge. In the vestibular system it localizes to nonsensory cells in contact with the otoconial membranes and cupulae. The founding mutation, a splice variant IVS12+2T>C, was identified in a consanguineous Palestinian DFNB22 family (PMID 11972037).

The GPI anchorage was later validated experimentally. A frameshift allele, p.Gln589ArgfsX55, abolishes controlled release of otoancorin, causing uncontrolled release into the culture medium rather than the expected phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC)-dependent release — confirming that the pathogenic mechanism is loss of proper membrane anchorage of the protein (PMID 30740825).

"Otoancorin is located at the interface between the apical surface of the inner ear sensory epithelia and their overlying acellular gels." — PMID: 11972037

"Otoancorin (OTOA), encoded by OTOA, is required for the development of the tectorial membrane in the inner ear. Mutations in this gene cause nonsyndromic hearing loss (DFNB22)." — PMID: 30740825

Ontology annotations: Gene HGNC:16378 (OTOA); GO:0031225 (anchored component of membrane); GO:0098590 (plasma membrane region); biological process GO:0042491 / GO:0060119 (inner ear receptor cell development); CHEBI: glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor.

Finding 2 — Mechanism: tectorial-membrane detachment causes loss of inner hair cell stimulation, sparing outer hair cell amplification

The Otoa(EGFP/EGFP) knockout mouse resolves precisely how loss of otoancorin causes deafness. In these animals the TM retains its general form and remains close to the organ of Corti, but is detached from the limbal (spiral limbus) surface. Physiological measurements show that the TM stays functionally attached to the electromotile OHCs: cochlear microphonics, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and basilar-membrane motion are almost normal, indicating preserved amplification and frequency tuning. However, compound action potential (CAP) thresholds — a read-out of IHC sensitivity — are significantly elevated, while CAP masker tuning curves remain sharply tuned. The conclusion is that DFNB22 hearing loss arises from a defect in inner hair cell stimulation, not from a failure of OHC-driven amplification (PMID 23129639).

"These results indicate that the hearing loss in patients with Otoa mutations is caused by a defect in inner hair cell stimulation, and reveal the limbal attachment of the TM plays a critical role in this process." — PMID: 23129639

This is mechanistically distinctive: many deafness genes act through OHC dysfunction or hair-bundle/mechanotransduction defects, whereas OTOA loss selectively disrupts the mechanical coupling that drives the IHCs, the afferent sensory cells.

Ontology annotations: CL:0000601 (cochlear inner hair cell), CL:0000599 (cochlear outer hair cell); UBERON:0002518 (tectorial membrane), UBERON:0002227 (organ of Corti), UBERON:0004681 (spiral limbus); GO:0007605 (sensory perception of sound).

Finding 3 — OTOA/OTOAP1 segmental duplication drives recurrent CNV deletions and gene conversions that complicate diagnosis

OTOA lies in a low-copy-repeat region on 16p12.2 that shares high sequence homology with the pseudogene OTOAP1, predisposing the locus to non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Recurrent deletions of OTOA are a well-recognized cause of moderate-to-severe hearing loss. In a chromosomal-microarray (CMA) cohort of 19,189 tests at Rabin Medical Center, heterozygous OTOA microdeletions were detected in 39 individuals (0.2% carrier frequency) (PMID 33753912).

A second, subtler mechanism is pathogenic gene conversion, in which OTOAP1 pseudogene sequence is copied into OTOA, introducing a premature stop codon p.Glu787* in exon 22. Two compound-heterozygous patients (one converted allele plus one deletion) had moderate hearing loss, with converted tracts ranging from ~900 bp to >9 kbp (PMID 33492714). Contiguous-gene deletions also occur: a 250.285 kb homozygous 16p12.2 deletion encompassing METTL9, IGSF6, and OTOA segregated with nonsyndromic SNHL in a South Indian consanguineous family (PMID 39916398).

Because these events are structural and occur in a repeat-rich region, short-read whole-exome sequencing and standard panels often miss them, and confirmation requires qPCR, MLPA, CMA, or long-read sequencing (PMID 35640668).

"Bi-allelic loss-of-function variants of OTOA are a well-known cause of moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Whereas non-allelic homologous recombination-mediated deletions of the gene are well known, gene conversions to pseudogene OTOAP1 have been reported" — PMID: 33492714

"OTOA deletions (39, 0.2%)" — PMID: 33753912

"A homozygous deletion of 250.285 kb was identified in the 16p12.2 region encompassing three genes, METTL9, IGSF6, and OTOA" — PMID: 39916398

Finding 4 — Clinical profile: congenital bilateral moderate-to-severe SNHL; low absolute per-carrier risk

Across reported families, DFNB22 presents as congenital/prelingual, bilateral, generally stable, nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss in the moderate-to-severe range (PMIDs 33492714, 32681043). Although OTOA is one of the more common CNV-driven recessive deafness loci, the absolute risk to any given microdeletion carrier is low. In the general CMA cohort, the OTOA microdeletion carrier frequency of 0.2% (39/19,189) placed it second to STRC (0.56%) and above the DFNB1/GJB6 locus (0.05%). The estimated probability that a given OTOA-microdeletion carrier is themselves affected (i.e., carries a second pathogenic allele) was only 0.016–0.13% — lower than for STRC (0.11–0.67%) and DFNB1 (1.9–7.5%) — with higher risk in specific (e.g., consanguineous or founder) populations (PMID 33753912).

"Of the 19,189 CMA tests were performed in our laboratory, 107 STRC microdeletions were found (0.56%), followed in frequency by OTOA deletions (39, 0.2%), and DFNB1 locus deletions (10, 0.05%). The estimated risk for a hearing loss in the examined individual carrying the microdeletion was estimated as 0.11-0.67% for STRC, 0.016-0.13% for OTOA" — PMID: 33753912

Ontology annotations: HP:0000407 (Sensorineural hearing impairment), HP:0008527 (Congenital sensorineural hearing impairment), HP:0000365 (Hearing impairment), HP:0000006 (Autosomal recessive inheritance).

Report by Template Section

1. Disease Information

DFNB22 is a monogenic form of nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss — that is, hearing loss without accompanying malformations or dysfunction of other organ systems. It is one of the numbered "DFNB" (autosomal recessive) deafness loci.

• Overview: Congenital, bilateral, typically stable moderate-to-severe SNHL due to biallelic OTOA loss-of-function and consequent tectorial-membrane detachment.
• Key identifiers: OMIM #607039 (disease); OMIM 607038 (OTOA* gene); MONDO:0011762; MeSH — indexed under Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; ICD-10 H90.3/H90.5 (sensorineural hearing loss); ICD-11 AB52 (sensorineural hearing impairment). A dedicated Orphanet number for DFNB22 is not consistently assigned; nonsyndromic genetic deafness is captured under Orphanet's rare genetic hearing-loss entries.
• Synonyms/alternative names: DFNB22; Deafness, autosomal recessive 22; Nonsyndromic hearing loss and deafness, DFNB22 type; OTOA-related hearing loss; Otoancorin deficiency deafness.
• Information source: Predominantly aggregated disease-level resources (OMIM, ClinVar) plus individual-patient case reports and consanguineous-family studies; a single mouse model provides the mechanistic physiology.

2. Etiology

• Causal factors: Purely genetic — biallelic (homozygous or compound heterozygous) loss-of-function variants in OTOA. No environmental or infectious cause.
• Genetic risk factors: The causal locus is OTOA. Consanguinity and founder effects substantially raise risk (founding Palestinian family; South Indian and Pakistani consanguineous families). The OTOA/OTOAP1 segmental duplication is itself a structural risk factor generating recurrent pathogenic alleles.
• Environmental risk factors: None established as causal. Ordinary otologic insults (noise, ototoxins) would be additive to residual hearing but are not part of DFNB22 etiology.
• Protective factors: None specific. Presence of at least one functional OTOA allele is fully protective (recessive disease; heterozygous carriers are unaffected).
• Gene–environment interactions: Not established; the phenotype is essentially fully genetically determined.

3. Phenotypes

• Quality-of-life impact: Congenital moderate-to-severe SNHL affects language acquisition, education, and social communication if unaddressed; with early hearing aids/cochlear implants and speech-language therapy, outcomes are generally good. Clinical vestibular symptoms are not a prominent reported feature despite otoancorin's vestibular localization.
• Disease-specific QoL instruments for DFNB22 are not reported; generic pediatric hearing-loss QoL measures apply.

4. Genetic / Molecular Information

• Causal gene: OTOA (HGNC:16378), 16p12.2, OMIM *607038, encoding otoancorin.
• Pathogenic variant types: Splice-site (founding IVS12+2T>C, PMID 11972037), frameshift (p.Gln589ArgfsX55, PMID 30740825), nonsense via gene conversion (p.Glu787*, PMID 33492714), missense candidates (e.g., p.Gly647Arg reported in dual-diagnosis contexts), and — most characteristically — structural CNV deletions (single-gene and contiguous-gene, e.g., 250 kb METTL9/IGSF6/OTOA deletion, PMID 39916398).
• Variant classification: Loss-of-function deletions and truncating variants are pathogenic/likely pathogenic under ACMG/AMP; some missense variants remain VUS.
• Allele frequency: OTOA microdeletion carrier frequency ~0.2% in a general CMA cohort (PMID 33753912).
• Origin: Germline.
• Functional consequence: Loss of function (loss of the GPI-anchored tether).
• Modifier genes / epigenetics / chromosomal abnormalities: No specific modifier genes or epigenetic mechanisms established. The relevant genomic feature is the 16p12.2 segmental duplication enabling NAHR and gene conversion.

5. Environmental Information

Not applicable as a cause. DFNB22 is a monogenic disorder with no established environmental, lifestyle, or infectious contributors. (General ototoxin/noise avoidance is prudent to preserve residual hearing but is not disease-specific.)

6. Mechanism / Pathophysiology — Causal Chain

1. Biallelic loss-of-function variant in OTOA (deletion, gene conversion, splice, frameshift) → leads to absent or non-functional otoancorin protein.
2. Loss of GPI-anchored otoancorin → results in failure to anchor the acellular tectorial membrane at its two attachment zones (permanent zone on the spiral limbus; transient zone on the greater epithelial ridge). (Demonstrated: PMID 11972037, 30740825.)
3. Failure of anchorage → causes detachment of the TM from the limbal (spiral limbus) surface, while the TM retains overall form and remains coupled to outer hair cells. (Demonstrated in mouse: PMID 23129639.)
4. Branch A (spared): TM–OHC coupling preserved → OHC electromotility, cochlear amplification, and frequency tuning remain near-normal (normal CM, DPOAEs, basilar-membrane motion, sharp tuning).
5. Branch B (impaired): Loss of proper limbal TM attachment → impairs mechanical drive to inner hair cell stereocilia → results in reduced IHC receptor potentials → elevated compound action potential thresholds. (Demonstrated: PMID 23129639.)
6. Reduced IHC afferent signaling → leads to decreased auditory-nerve output → manifests as congenital, bilateral, moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss.

Upstream vs downstream: The mutation and protein loss are upstream; TM detachment is the central lesion; IHC understimulation is the proximate downstream cause of the clinical deafness. The disorder is mechanical/structural, not driven by apoptosis, inflammation, metabolic, or immune processes.

• Molecular pathways: No classical signaling cascade (Wnt/MAPK/mTOR) implicated; the mechanism is structural adhesion of an acellular gel to sensory epithelium.
• Protein dysfunction: Loss of GPI membrane anchorage (uncontrolled release instead of PI-PLC-controlled release), PMID 30740825.
• Cell types / processes: Inner hair cells (CL:0000601) understimulated; outer hair cells (CL:0000599) spared; supporting/nonsensory epithelial cells of the spiral limbus involved in TM anchoring. GO:0007605 (sensory perception of sound), GO:0060119 (inner ear receptor cell development).
• Molecular profiling / advanced technologies: No transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, single-cell, spatial, or CRISPR-screen datasets specific to DFNB22 were identified.

7. Anatomical Structures Affected

• Organ: Inner ear / cochlea (primary). System: auditory (special sense). UBERON:0001846 (internal ear), UBERON:0001844 (cochlea).
• Tissue/cell: Cochlear sensory epithelium (organ of Corti, UBERON:0002227); the acellular tectorial membrane (UBERON:0002518) and its spiral limbus anchorage (UBERON:0004681). Vestibular otoconial membranes/cupulae also express otoancorin. Cells: inner hair cells (CL:0000601, functionally affected), outer hair cells (CL:0000599, spared).
• Subcellular: Apical plasma-membrane region of sensory/nonsensory epithelial cells; GPI-anchored component of membrane (GO:0031225).
• Localization/laterality: Bilateral, symmetric.

8. Temporal Development

• Onset: Congenital / prelingual; onset pattern chronic/stable from birth.
• Progression: Generally stable (non-progressive) moderate-to-severe SNHL; lifelong.
• Critical period: The window for auditory habilitation (hearing aids/cochlear implant, speech-language therapy) is early childhood, to support language development.

9. Inheritance and Population

• Inheritance: Autosomal recessive (HP:0000006). Carriers are unaffected.
• Penetrance/expressivity: Biallelic pathogenic genotypes are essentially fully penetrant; severity clusters in the moderate-to-severe range with some variability.
• Founder effects/consanguinity: Prominent — founding Palestinian family (PMID 11972037); consanguineous South Indian (PMID 39916398) and Pakistani (PMID 32681043) families. Consanguinity is a major risk amplifier.
• Carrier frequency: ~0.2% for OTOA microdeletions in a general population CMA cohort; per-carrier affected risk 0.016–0.13% (PMID 33753912).
• Epidemiology: OTOA is among the more common CNV-driven recessive deafness loci (second to STRC), but DFNB22 is individually rare. No sex predilection (autosomal). Higher diagnostic yield in consanguineous/endemic-founder populations.

10. Diagnostics

• Audiometry: Pure-tone/behavioral audiometry and ABR reveal bilateral moderate-to-severe SNHL; OAEs may be relatively preserved given spared OHC function (mechanistically expected from the mouse data, PMID 23129639) — a potentially distinctive audiologic signature of TM/IHC-coupling disorders.
• Genetic testing (core diagnostic): Because pathogenic alleles are frequently structural (deletions/gene conversions) in the OTOA/OTOAP1 repeat, testing must be copy-number-aware: gene panels/WES for point variants plus CMA, MLPA, qPCR, or long-read sequencing to detect CNVs and conversions (PMIDs 35640668, 33492714, 33753912). Short-read WES alone under-detects DFNB22.
• Imaging: Temporal-bone CT/MRI generally normal (nonsyndromic; no gross malformation expected).
• Differential diagnosis: Other recessive nonsyndromic deafness (esp. STRC/DFNB16, GJB2/DFNB1, SLC26A4/Pendred, TECTA-related tectorial-membrane deafness which is a key mechanistic mimic). Distinguish by gene, and clinically by the preserved-OAE/elevated-threshold pattern for TM-anchoring defects. Exclude syndromic causes and dual diagnoses (e.g., co-occurring ERCC4 or PALM3 variants reported in consanguineous families).
• Screening: Newborn hearing screening (OAE/ABR) detects the phenotype; cascade carrier testing and reporting of incidental OTOA microdeletions on CMA are debated given low per-carrier risk (PMID 33753912).

11. Outcome / Prognosis

• Survival/mortality: DFNB22 is not life-limiting; normal life expectancy. It is a sensory disorder with no systemic mortality.
• Morbidity/function: Principal morbidity is communication disability if unaided; excellent functional prognosis with early amplification/cochlear implantation and speech-language support. Hearing loss is generally stable, not progressive.
• Prognostic factors: Timeliness of habilitation and degree of residual hearing. No molecular prognostic biomarkers established.

12. Treatment

• No disease-specific pharmacotherapy or approved gene/RNA/cell therapy exists for DFNB22.
• Habilitative/standard of care: Hearing aids (NCIT: Hearing Aid) for moderate loss; cochlear implantation (NCIT: Cochlear Implant) for severe loss with insufficient aided benefit; speech-language therapy and educational support.
• Supportive/rehabilitative: Auditory-verbal therapy, aural rehabilitation, family/educational accommodations.
• Experimental: Inner-ear gene therapy is an active field for monogenic deafness generally, but no DFNB22/OTOA-specific trial was identified. The relatively preserved cochlear architecture and OHC function in Otoa-null mice make DFNB22 a conceptually attractive future gene-replacement target.
• Pharmacogenomics: Not applicable.

13. Prevention

• Primary prevention: Not possible for a congenital monogenic disorder; genetic counseling for consanguineous couples and known carrier families is the principal preventive tool. Carrier and cascade screening can inform reproductive choices (including PGT/prenatal testing where desired).
• Secondary prevention: Universal newborn hearing screening for early detection, enabling timely habilitation during the critical language-development window.
• Tertiary prevention: Amplification/cochlear implantation and speech therapy to prevent language and educational sequelae; avoidance of additional ototoxic/noise insults to protect residual hearing.
• Counseling: Autosomal recessive 25% recurrence risk for carrier couples; emphasize the copy-number-aware testing needs given the OTOA/OTOAP1 architecture.

14. Other Species / Natural Disease

• Taxonomy/orthologs: Otoa is conserved in mouse (Mus musculus, NCBI Taxon 10090) and other mammals; the mouse ortholog underpins the disease model. Otoancorin and the related α-tectorin machinery are conserved across vertebrates.
• Natural disease in animals: No prominent naturally occurring companion-animal or wildlife OTOA deafness disorder was identified in this investigation. The knockout mouse is the principal model.
• Comparative biology: The mouse recapitulates the human mechanism (TM detachment, spared OHC/impaired IHC drive), supporting strong evolutionary conservation of TM-anchoring mechanisms.

15. Model Organisms

• Mouse (Mus musculus):* The Otoa(EGFP/EGFP) knockout* is the defining model (PMID 23129639). It faithfully recapitulates the core human phenotype and, uniquely, dissected the mechanism — showing TM detachment from the spiral limbus, preserved OHC amplification, and elevated CAP thresholds reflecting failed IHC stimulation.
• Type: Targeted knockout (EGFP knock-in/reporter-null).
• Phenotype recapitulation: High — reproduces congenital SNHL and the specific IHC-stimulation defect; also enabled protein-localization studies.
• Limitations: Mouse does not capture the human OTOA/OTOAP1 segmental-duplication genomics (pseudogene-driven NAHR/gene-conversion mechanisms are human-specific). No zebrafish/Drosophila/organoid DFNB22 models were identified.
• Resources: MGI (mouse Otoa).

Mechanistic Model / Interpretation

 OTOA biallelic LoF (deletion / gene conversion / splice / frameshift)
 │
 ▼
     Absent / non-functional otoancorin (GPI-anchored tether)
 │
 ▼
   Tectorial membrane not anchored at spiral-limbus (limbal) attachment
 │
┌────────┴───────────────┐
▼                        ▼
 TM stays coupled to        TM detached from limbus →
 OUTER hair cells           mechanical drive to INNER
 → amplification &          hair cell stereocilia lost
 tuning ~NORMAL             │
 (normal CM, DPOAE,         ▼
  BM motion)          IHC receptor potentials ↓
            │
            ▼
  CAP thresholds ↑ (IHC sensitivity ↓)
            │
            ▼
      Congenital bilateral moderate-to-severe SNHL (stable)

The unifying interpretation is that DFNB22 is a "connectivity" / mechanical-coupling deafness: the cochlea's amplifier (OHCs) works, but the sensory receiver (IHCs) is under-driven because the TM has lost its anchor to the spiral limbus. This explains both the clinical severity (moderate-to-severe rather than profound) and a predicted audiologic signature of comparatively preserved otoacoustic emissions with elevated behavioral/ABR thresholds — a pattern shared with other TM-anchoring/structural deafness genes (e.g., TECTA, OTOG, STRC). The human genomics layer — a segmental duplication with the OTOAP1 pseudogene — superimposes a diagnostic challenge: the disease is under-ascertained by short-read exome sequencing and requires copy-number/gene-conversion-aware testing.

Evidence Base

All four core findings are convergently supported: the gene–disease link and protein function (PMIDs 11972037, 30740825), the mechanism (PMID 23129639), the diagnostic genomics (PMIDs 33492714, 33753912, 39916398, 35640668), and the clinical/epidemiologic profile (PMIDs 33753912, 33492714, 32681043). No paper reviewed contradicts these conclusions.

Limitations and Knowledge Gaps

• Single mechanistic model. The mechanism rests primarily on one mouse study (PMID 23129639). Human intracochlear physiology is inferred, not directly measured; the predicted "preserved-OAE" audiologic signature has not been systematically catalogued across human DFNB22 patients.
• No omics data. No transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, single-cell, or functional-screen datasets specific to DFNB22 were identified — the molecular-profiling subsections are effectively "not available."
• Phenotype quantification is coarse. Severity/progression are described qualitatively ("moderate-to-severe, generally stable"); no natural-history cohort with longitudinal audiograms was available to quantify progression rates or variability precisely.
• Vestibular phenotype under-characterized. Otoancorin localizes to vestibular structures, yet clinical vestibular dysfunction in DFNB22 is not well documented — a genotype–phenotype gap.
• Genomic complexity limits ascertainment. The OTOA/OTOAP1 architecture means true prevalence is likely underestimated in short-read-only cohorts; reported frequencies (0.2% carriers) are lower bounds.
• No therapeutics. No disease-specific pharmacologic, gene, RNA, or cell therapy exists or is in trials for OTOA.

Proposed Follow-up Experiments / Actions

1. Audiologic phenotyping study. Systematically measure OAEs vs ABR/behavioral thresholds in a molecularly confirmed DFNB22 cohort to test whether preserved-emission/elevated-threshold is a reproducible clinical signature (translating the mouse mechanism, PMID 23129639).
2. Copy-number-aware diagnostic pipeline. Standardize CMA/MLPA/qPCR or long-read sequencing for OTOA in unsolved recessive SNHL to capture NAHR deletions and OTOAP1 gene conversions that short-read WES misses (PMIDs 33492714, 35640668).
3. Natural-history registry. Assemble longitudinal audiograms across DFNB22 families to quantify progression, variability, and cochlear-implant outcomes.
4. Vestibular assessment. Add vestibular testing (vHIT, VEMP, caloric) to DFNB22 evaluations to define the vestibular phenotype implied by otoancorin's vestibular localization.
5. Gene-replacement proof-of-concept. Given preserved cochlear architecture and OHC function in Otoa-null mice, test AAV-mediated Otoa delivery to the developing/mature cochlea to restore TM anchorage and IHC drive — a rational DFNB22-specific therapeutic avenue.
6. Population-specific carrier data. Determine OTOA pathogenic-allele frequencies in consanguineous/founder populations to refine per-carrier risk and inform carrier-screening/reporting policy (extending PMID 33753912).

Evidence source key: Human clinical = patient/family reports and cohorts; Model organism = mouse; In vitro = cell-based functional assays; Population/epidemiologic = cohort frequency analyses. All mechanistic and clinical claims are cited to primary literature by PMID.

Artifacts

• OpenScientist final report
• OpenScientist final report

Reference Validation

Checked with linkml-reference-validator 0.2.1.

All extracted references resolved successfully.

Term Validation

Checked with linkml-term-validator 0.4.5, through the ols: adapter.

Terms the report names something else

These identifiers resolve, so nothing about them looks wrong, and the ontology calls them something unrelated to what the report calls them. That usually means the identifier is not the one the sentence needs:

• CL:0000599 (3 mentions) - the report calls it "cochlear outer hair cell"; CL calls it conidium
• UBERON:0002518 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "tectorial membrane"; UBERON calls it otolith organ
• UBERON:0004681 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "spiral limbus"; UBERON calls it vestibular system
• HP:0000407 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "Sensorineural hearing impairment", "~100% of affected"; HP calls it Sensorineural hearing impairment
• HP:0008527 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "Congenital sensorineural hearing impairment", "Predominant presentation"; HP calls it Congenital sensorineural hearing impairment
• HP:0000750 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Secondary to HL"; HP calls it Delayed speech and language development

Obsolete terms

These terms are real but deprecated. Citing one is not a fabrication; it does mean the report is naming something the ontology has retired:

• GO:0031225 (obsolete anchored component of membrane) (2 mentions) - replaced by GO:0016020

Terms whose name is worth a second look

The report's name for these is recognisably related to the term's own name without being one of them. A loose paraphrase reads the same way as a citation of the wrong sibling term - and so does a related synonym, which the ontology records precisely because it names something adjacent rather than the same thing - so these are listed rather than judged:

• GO:0031225 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "anchored component of membrane"; GO calls it obsolete anchored component of membrane
• CL:0000601 (3 mentions) - the report calls it "cochlear inner hair cell", "Cell types / processes: Inner hair cells"; CL calls it cochlear outer hair cell**
• UBERON:0002227 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "organ of Corti"; UBERON calls it spiral organ of cochlea, and lists "organ of Corti" among its other names
• HP:0000006 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "Autosomal recessive inheritance", "Inheritance: Autosomal recessive"; HP calls it Autosomal dominant inheritance**

Terms named inconsistently

The report gives these identifiers more than one name of its own:

• HGNC:16378 - called "OTOA", "Causal gene:* OTOA"
• CL:0000601 - called "cochlear inner hair cell", "Cell types / processes:** Inner hair cells"
• HP:0000407 - called "Sensorineural hearing impairment", "~100% of affected"
• HP:0008527 - called "Congenital sensorineural hearing impairment", "Predominant presentation"
• HP:0000006 - called "Autosomal recessive inheritance", "Inheritance:** Autosomal recessive"