Can pharmacologic inhibition of mTORC1 actually break the reciprocal PI3K/AKT-AR feedback loop this module is built around, given that rapalogs only partially inhibit mTORC2 and therefore themselves elicit the same PI3K/AKT-induced feedback, and that everolimus monotherapy produced no PSA responses in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer?
KNOWLEDGE GAP
OPEN
gap_mtor_adt_rapalog_feedback_and_monotherapy_failure
Attached to:
mTORC1 Hyperactivation
The module's therapeutic arm asserts that inhibiting mTORC1 relieves the resistant phenotype, but the cited review documents the reverse running through the same loop the module models: "the rapalog family only has a partial inhibition of mTORC2. As a result, the associated inhibition of mTORC1 can elicit PI3K/AKT-induced positive feedback mechanisms that constrain the durable effectiveness of the therapeutic responses" (PMID:41525007). The clinical record is correspondingly negative — in NCT00976755 everolimus monotherapy in 37 post-docetaxel mCRPC patients showed "minimal clinical effectiveness, and no patient displayed a PSA response, with a median PFS of only 3 months". Combination evidence for the strategy remains preclinical (PMID:21575859, Pten-deficient murine and xenograft models); the one combination trial named in the review (NCT00814788, everolimus plus bicalutamide) is cited without an outcome. Until a combination trial reports, whether the mTORC1 node is a tractable drug target in this disease or only a mechanistic waypoint is genuinely open, and conforming disorder entries must not curate rapalog therapy as an effective intervention on the strength of this module.
Proposed experiments:
Rapalog versus dual mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor, each combined with an AR-pathway inhibitor