Can proteostatic capacity be measured in humans, as opposed to measuring the specific proteins that have already aggregated?
KNOWLEDGE GAP
OPEN
knowledge_gap_no_general_proteostasis_capacity_biomarker
Attached to:
Proteostasis Network Decline
Loss of Proteostasis
The one marker curated in this module attaches to the third node in the chain, Misfolded-Protein Aggregation, and to one aggregating protein within it. The two upstream nodes, which are what the hallmark actually names, have no human biomarker at all. Chaperone capacity, ubiquitin-proteasome throughput and the heat-shock response are measurable in cells and in model organisms but not from an accessible human sample, so what reaches the clinic is the failure's product rather than the failing capacity. The practical consequence is that proteostasis can currently only be assessed after aggregation has occurred, which is the wrong end for prevention and for any trial wanting an early pharmacodynamic readout. A second consequence for this KB: markers that look like proteostasis markers are usually disease-specific aggregation markers, and importing more of them would make the module look better covered than it is while leaving the hallmark itself unmeasured.