⚙

Pathophysiology Nodes

4
4 shared nodes are defined in this module.
◉

Cell Types

0
No cell types are annotated for this module.
⇄

Biological Processes

2
DNA Damage Response GO:0006974 ↑ INCREASED Gene Ontology (GO) Relation: this mechanism module involves this biological process This mechanism module involves increased DNA Damage Response (GO:0006974). GO:0006974 is a biological process from the Gene Ontology. DNA Repair GO:0006281 ↓ DECREASED Gene Ontology (GO) Relation: this mechanism module involves this biological process This mechanism module involves decreased DNA Repair (GO:0006281). GO:0006281 is a biological process from the Gene Ontology.
i

Notes

This is a mechanism module, not a specific disease. Disorder entries reference individual nodes via conforms_to (e.g., "genomic_instability_aging#Declining Genome Maintenance and Erroneous Repair"). This is the deliberate aging-facing counterpart of the cancer-facing genome_instability_mutation module: they share the upstream DNA-damage/repair-failure chain but diverge at the outcome - genome_instability_mutation ends in a mutator phenotype and clonal evolution toward malignancy, whereas this module ends in DNA-damage-driven cellular dysfunction, senescence, and tissue aging. Do not duplicate the cancer arm here; conforming neoplastic disorders should use genome_instability_mutation instead. This module feeds cellular_senescence and telomere_attrition, and its natural conformers are the DNA-repair-deficiency progeroid syndromes (Werner, Cockayne, xeroderma pigmentosum, Rothmund-Thomson). Key conformance target: "genomic_instability_aging#Declining Genome Maintenance and Erroneous Repair". A naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) comparative negative model is attached under animal_models: the genotoxic input node is recapitulated - this species carries more oxidative DNA damage than the mouse - while declining genome maintenance and the aging consequence are not. It is a species comparison, not a disease model, and conforming disorder entries do NOT inherit those links.
🐁

Animal Models

2
Naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) comparative longevity model
Comparative negative model for this module. The naked mole-rat receives at least as much oxidative DNA damage as a mouse, so the trigger node is present, yet it shows more efficient excision repair than the mouse and reaches none of the age-related decline this chain terminates in over a lifespan above 30 years. It is curated here to mark which step of the chain a naturally long-lived mammal breaks, not as a model of a disease.
Species
Naked mole-rat
Genotype
Wild type
Publication
Aging turquoise killifish kidney marrow (Nothobranchius furzeri) Naturally short-lived vertebrate aging model
Morabito and colleagues asked whether the killifish immune compartment ages the way the mammalian one does. Immune progenitor populations in old fish carry increased DNA damage markers, while progenitors from younger adults show active proliferation and replication-independent repair. Because the whole transition occurs in under ten weeks, the model compresses progenitor genome-maintenance decline into a timescale where interventions can be tested directly.
Species
Turquoise killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri)
Genotype
Wild type
Background
Young-adult versus old fish, sampling kidney marrow as the principal hematopoietic organ, profiled by single-cell RNA sequencing, cytometry, functional in vitro assays, and proteomics of marrow-derived cells and plasma.
Publication
Curated as part of a tranche adding turquoise killifish models across the hallmarks-of-aging modules. The same study underpins the killifish model on the inflammaging module; the two entries deliberately cite different findings from it rather than duplicating one claim.
🧮

Computational Models

2
Watson2020 Fitness Landscape of Clonal Hematopoiesis KINETIC
Inference framework that recovers the fitness effects of somatic driver mutations from the variant-allele-frequency spectrum in blood. It establishes that the age-related expansion of mutant clones follows quantitatively from selection acting on somatic mutations arising at a roughly constant rate, and estimates per-driver fitness advantages.
Important corrective for this module: an age-associated rise in detectable mutant fraction is driven mostly by selection and expansion, not by a rising mutation rate.
Watson2021 Interacting Evolutionary Pressures in Aging Blood KINETIC
Extension of the somatic-evolution framework to multiple interacting selective pressures acting on the aging hematopoietic stem cell pool, relating mutation dynamics to health outcomes and showing how competing clones shape which drivers reach detectable frequency.
⌘

Module Collections

1
↗

Used By Disorder Entries

6
⬡

Pathograph

Use the checkboxes to hide or show graph categories. Hover nodes for evidence-backed metadata.
Pathograph: causal mechanism network for Genomic Instability (Aging) Module Interactive directed graph showing how this shared module's pathophysiology nodes connect.
⚙

Pathophysiology

4
Accumulating DNA Damage
trigger
Somatic cells are continuously exposed to endogenous and environmental sources of DNA damage - reactive oxygen species, spontaneous replication errors, UV and ionizing radiation, and environmental mutagens - that introduce a very large number of chemical lesions into the genome each day. This continuous genotoxic burden is the initiating input of the hallmark.
DNA Damage Response GO:0006974 ↑ INCREASED Gene Ontology (GO) Relation: this pathophysiological event involves this biological process This pathophysiological event involves increased DNA Damage Response (GO:0006974). GO:0006974 is a biological process from the Gene Ontology.
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:23398157 SUPPORT Other
"Somatic cells are continuously exposed to various sources of DNA damage, from reactive oxygen species to UV radiation to environmental mutagens."
Enumerates the continuous endogenous and environmental sources of DNA damage that constitute the genotoxic input modeled here. Evidence source is OTHER because this is a review.
PMID:23398157 SUPPORT Other
"To cope with the tens of thousands of chemical lesions introduced into the genome of a typical cell each day, a complex network of genome maintenance systems acts to remove damage and restore the correct base pair sequence."
Quantifies the daily lesion burden and introduces the genome-maintenance network that normally counters it, framing the trigger and the next node. Evidence source is OTHER because this is a review.
Declining Genome Maintenance and Erroneous Repair
central effector
Genome-maintenance and DNA-repair capacity is normally sufficient to remove damage and restore the correct sequence, but with age this capacity declines while damage continues to accrue, and repair is sometimes erroneous (as is replication during division). The failure to fully and faithfully repair accumulating damage is the central effector that disease-specific genome-maintenance defects converge upon.
DNA Repair GO:0006281 ↓ DECREASED Gene Ontology (GO) Relation: this pathophysiological event involves this biological process This pathophysiological event involves decreased DNA Repair (GO:0006281). GO:0006281 is a biological process from the Gene Ontology.
Show evidence (1 reference)
PMID:23398157 SUPPORT Other
"Occasionally, however, repair is erroneous, and such errors, as well as the occasional failure to correctly replicate the genome during cell division, are the basis for mutations and epimutations."
Establishes erroneous repair and replication failure as the source of mutations and epimutations, the failing-maintenance effector modeled here. Evidence source is OTHER because this is a review.
Accumulation of Somatic Mutations and Genomic Damage
effector
Unrepaired and misrepaired lesions leave a rising burden of somatic mutations, epimutations, and persistent DNA damage that accumulates in various organs and tissues over the lifespan. This is the conserved measure of genomic instability in the aging frame, upstream of its cellular consequences.
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:23398157 SUPPORT Other
"There is now ample evidence that mutations accumulate in various organs and tissues of higher animals, including humans, mice, and flies."
Documents accumulation of somatic mutations across organs and tissues with age, the genomic-damage burden modeled in this node. Evidence source is OTHER because this is a review.
PMID:23746838 SUPPORT Other
"These hallmarks are: genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and altered intercellular communication."
Enumerates genomic instability as a hallmark of aging, framing this module. Evidence source is OTHER because this is a review.
DNA-Damage-Driven Cellular Dysfunction and Aging
consequence
In the aging frame, the accumulated DNA damage and mutation burden drives cellular dysfunction, senescence, and cell loss - affecting most aspects of the aging phenotype and acting as a potentially unifying cause of aging. This is the conserved consequence that distinguishes the aging arm from the cancer arm (mutator phenotype and clonal evolution); the specific organ or disease phenotype is supplied by the conforming disorder, and targeting DNA damage is a rationale for anti-aging intervention.
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:33911272 SUPPORT Other
"Here we synthesize accumulating evidence that DNA damage affects most, if not all, aspects of the ageing phenotype, making it a potentially unifying cause of ageing."
Establishes DNA damage as affecting most aspects of the aging phenotype and a potentially unifying cause of aging, the consequence modeled here. Evidence source is OTHER because this is a review.
PMID:33911272 SUPPORT Other
"Targeting DNA damage and its mechanistic links with the ageing phenotype will provide a logical rationale for developing unified interventions to counteract age-related dysfunction and disease."
Frames DNA-damage targeting as a rationale for anti-aging intervention, the intervention angle of this outcome node. Evidence source is OTHER because this is a review.