Selective IgM deficiency is an inborn error of immunity defined by persistently absent or reduced serum IgM with preserved IgG and IgA, and with secondary causes such as protein-losing enteropathy, nephrotic syndrome and malignancy excluded. The IUIS has classified it among the predominantly antibody-affecting deficiencies since 2017. Recurrent respiratory infection is the commonest presentation, followed by allergic and autoimmune disease. This entry is unusual for dismech in that it has almost no pathograph, and the absence is the finding rather than a curation shortfall. The entity is defined by a laboratory value, not by a mechanism: no genetic or molecular basis has been established as a cause, the diagnostic criteria in use disagree with each other, and in one pediatric cohort of isolated IgM deficiency 26% of patients turned out on molecular testing to have a different, nameable inborn error of immunity. Its own literature calls for the definition to be redrawn. What is curated here is therefore the definitional state of the concept — two competing criteria sets recorded as `definitions`, the phenotype associations that are reproducible across cohorts, and the gaps stated as discussions rather than papered over with a plausible mechanism. Whether this should remain a Disease entry or become a laboratory finding is a live question, and the entry says so.
Ask a research question about Selective IgM Deficiency. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
Conditions with similar clinical presentations that must be differentiated from Selective IgM Deficiency:
name: Selective IgM Deficiency
creation_date: "2026-09-15T13:18:10Z"
category: Acquired
description: >-
Selective IgM deficiency is an inborn error of immunity defined by persistently
absent or reduced serum IgM with preserved IgG and IgA, and with secondary
causes such as protein-losing enteropathy, nephrotic syndrome and malignancy
excluded. The IUIS has classified it among the predominantly
antibody-affecting deficiencies since 2017. Recurrent respiratory infection is
the commonest presentation, followed by allergic and autoimmune disease.
This entry is unusual for dismech in that it has almost no pathograph, and the
absence is the finding rather than a curation shortfall. The entity is defined
by a laboratory value, not by a mechanism: no genetic or molecular basis has
been established as a cause, the diagnostic criteria in use disagree with each
other, and in one pediatric cohort of isolated IgM deficiency 26% of patients
turned out on molecular testing to have a different, nameable inborn error of
immunity. Its own literature calls for the definition to be redrawn.
What is curated here is therefore the definitional state of the concept — two
competing criteria sets recorded as `definitions`, the phenotype associations
that are reproducible across cohorts, and the gaps stated as discussions
rather than papered over with a plausible mechanism. Whether this should
remain a Disease entry or become a laboratory finding is a live question, and
the entry says so.
disease_term:
preferred_term: selective IgM deficiency
term:
id: MONDO:0018039
label: selective IgM deficiency
synonyms:
- SIgMD
- sIgMD
- selective immunoglobulin M deficiency
- isolated IgM deficiency
- selective IgM hypogammaglobulinemia
classifications:
iuis_category:
classification_value: predominantly antibody deficiency
notes: >-
Included in the IUIS classification of inborn errors of immunity since
2017, among the predominantly antibody-affecting deficiencies. The
classification is what makes this a curatable entity at all; the
mechanism does not.
definitions:
- name: IUIS definition
definition_type: DIAGNOSTIC_CRITERIA
description: >-
Absent serum IgM with preserved IgG and IgA concentrations. The permissive
of the two definitions in use: it requires no infectious history and no
vaccine-response testing.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41009569
reference_title: "Expanding the Spectrum of Selective IgM Deficiency: From Infections to Immune Dysregulation."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "The IUIS defines sIgMD as absent serum IgM with preserved IgG and IgA concentrations"
explanation: >-
States the IUIS criterion verbatim.
quote_role: BACKGROUND
- name: ESID working definition
definition_type: DIAGNOSTIC_CRITERIA
description: >-
Substantially more stringent than the IUIS definition: IgM more than 2
standard deviations below the age-matched mean, preserved IgG and IgA,
infections present, normal IgG subclasses and vaccination responses, and
T-cell defects excluded. Requiring infection as a criterion is what makes
the two sets select different patients, and is the specific point the 2025
cohort study challenges.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41009569
reference_title: "Expanding the Spectrum of Selective IgM Deficiency: From Infections to Immune Dysregulation."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "ESID working criteria for clinical diagnosis of IEIs are even more stringent, requiring, along with IgM deficiency (<2 standard deviations [SD] below age-matched mean), preserved IgG and IgA, the presence of infections, normal concentrations of IgG subclasses and vaccination responses, and exclusion of T-cell defects"
explanation: >-
States the ESID criteria, including the infection requirement that
distinguishes it from the IUIS definition.
quote_role: BACKGROUND
- name: Exclusion of secondary causes
definition_type: DIAGNOSTIC_CRITERIA
description: >-
Common to both definitions and independent of which is used. Protein-losing
enteropathy, nephrotic syndrome and malignancy must be excluded before a
primary deficiency is diagnosed.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41009569
reference_title: "Expanding the Spectrum of Selective IgM Deficiency: From Infections to Immune Dysregulation."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "Irrespective of the definition, secondary causes such as protein-losing enteropathies, nephrotic syndrome, or malignancy have to be excluded."
explanation: >-
Establishes the exclusion requirement and that it holds under both
definitions.
quote_role: BACKGROUND
pathophysiology:
- name: Persistently Reduced Serum IgM
biological_scale: ORGANISM
description: >-
The defining abnormality, and the only node this entry asserts. IgM is the
first antibody isotype produced in a humoral response and has a central role
in early immune defence, so a persistent deficit is mechanistically
plausible as a cause of the infection phenotype. No step upstream of this
node is established: no gene, no cellular defect in B-cell terminal
differentiation, and no regulatory mechanism has been shown to cause it.
The node is deliberately left without an upstream cause rather than given a
speculative one.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41009569
reference_title: "Expanding the Spectrum of Selective IgM Deficiency: From Infections to Immune Dysregulation."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "IgM plays a central role in early immune responses, yet the clinical significance of its deficiency remains poorly defined."
explanation: >-
States both halves of what this node can claim: the biological role of the
missing isotype, and the fact that the consequence of losing it is not
established. The sentence is the review's framing rather than its own
result.
quote_role: BACKGROUND
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "The pathogenesis of SIgMD remains elusive, and thus far no genetic nor molecular basis has been clearly established as a definitive cause of this primary immunodeficiency."
explanation: >-
The explicit statement that no upstream mechanism is known, which is why
this node has no parent in the pathograph.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
downstream:
- target: Recurrent Respiratory Infection
description: >-
The commonest clinical consequence. The association is reproducible across
cohorts; the mechanistic step from low IgM to infection susceptibility is
assumed from IgM's role in early responses rather than demonstrated in
these patients.
phenotypes:
- category: Immunological
name: Recurrent Respiratory Infection
description: >-
The main clinical manifestation in children, and the feature the ESID
definition requires. Reported at 67% of a 48-patient pediatric cohort as
recurrent infections of any kind; pulmonary infections specifically were
27.0% and 21.1% in the two arms of a 75-patient adult-predominant series.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Recurrent respiratory infections
term:
id: HP:0002205
label: Recurrent respiratory infections
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "Recurrent respiratory infections represent the main clinical manifestations in children, followed by allergic and autoimmune diseases."
explanation: >-
Establishes the rank order of clinical associations.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
- reference: PMID:37728524
reference_title: "Clinical and immunological phenotypes of selective IgM deficiency in children: Results from a multicenter study."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The most common clinical manifestations were recurrent infections (67%) and allergies (48%)."
explanation: >-
Quantifies the association in a 48-patient pediatric cohort. Note the
figure is recurrent infection of any site, not respiratory specifically.
- category: Immunological
name: Allergic Rhinitis
description: >-
The single most frequent manifestation in adult series — more frequent than
infection in the 75-patient study under either diagnostic criterion, which
is one reason the infection-requiring ESID definition is contested.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Allergic rhinitis
term:
id: HP:0003193
label: Allergic rhinitis
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39680289
reference_title: "Selective IgM deficiency: evaluation of 75 patients according to different diagnostic criteria."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The most frequent clinical manifestations were allergic rhinitis (G1, 45.9%; G2, 36.8%), asthma (G1, 37.8%; G2, 28.9%), and pulmonary infections (G1, 27.03%; G2, 21.05%)."
explanation: >-
Gives the frequencies under both diagnostic criteria, and shows allergic
manifestations outranking infection in this series under either.
- category: Immunological
name: Asthma
description: >-
The second most frequent manifestation in the 75-patient adult series under
either diagnostic criterion, ahead of pulmonary infection. Previously
reported inside a combined allergic-disease node bound only to allergic
rhinitis, which left the figure without a term of its own.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Asthma
term:
id: HP:0002099
label: Asthma
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39680289
reference_title: "Selective IgM deficiency: evaluation of 75 patients according to different diagnostic criteria."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The most frequent clinical manifestations were allergic rhinitis (G1, 45.9%; G2, 36.8%), asthma (G1, 37.8%; G2, 28.9%), and pulmonary infections (G1, 27.03%; G2, 21.05%)."
explanation: >-
Gives the asthma frequency under both diagnostic criteria, in the same
sentence that carries the rhinitis and infection figures.
- category: Neoplastic
name: Neoplasia
description: >-
Reported in 13.51% of the stricter-criteria group of the 75-patient series,
and named alongside autoimmunity and CVID as a reason the authors advise
follow-up. Curated as an association of the entity rather than a consequence
of it: no mechanism links the two, which is this entry's position throughout.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Neoplasia
term:
id: HP:0002664
label: Neoplasm
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39680289
reference_title: "Selective IgM deficiency: evaluation of 75 patients according to different diagnostic criteria."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Chromosomopathies (16.22%) and neoplasia (13.51%) were more frequent in G1, whereas URTI (23.68%) and skin infections (23.68%) were more common in G2."
explanation: >-
Quantifies neoplasia in the stricter-criteria group. The between-group
contrast bears on the entry's diagnostic-criteria discussion.
- category: Immunological
name: Autoimmunity
description: >-
Reported directly at 43% in a 62-patient adult series, and as the third
commonest association after infection and allergy. The
75-patient series separately advises follow-up because of the risk of
developing autoimmunity, neoplasia and common variable immunodeficiency.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Autoimmunity
term:
id: HP:0002960
label: Autoimmunity
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31970029
reference_title: "Comprehensive clinical and immunological features of 62 adult patients with selective primary IgM deficiency."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Forty three percent of patients had associated autoimmune diseases including Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and systemic lupus erythematosus."
explanation: >-
The direct frequency measurement in a 62-patient adult series, with the two
commonest diagnoses named.
directness: DIRECT
- reference: PMID:39680289
reference_title: "Selective IgM deficiency: evaluation of 75 patients according to different diagnostic criteria."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Considering the possibility of developing autoimmunity, neoplasia, and common variable immunodeficiency, it is advisable to follow up patients with SIgMD."
explanation: >-
Records the three longer-term risks that make follow-up advisable. The
sentence is a recommendation drawn from the series rather than an incidence
measurement.
directness: INDIRECT
- reference: PMID:30610030
reference_title: "Autoimmunity and immunodeficiency at the crossroad: autoimmune disorders as the presenting feature of selective IgM deficiency."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Selective immunoglobulin M deficiency (sIgMD) should be taken into consideration when evaluating patients with multiple autoimmune diseases as the presence of this immunodeficiency can manifest sometimes only with autoimmunity."
explanation: >-
The report's own conclusion, and a distinct claim from the 43% frequency:
autoimmunity can be the sole presenting manifestation, so the association
is not merely a comorbidity counted alongside infection.
directness: DIRECT
prevalence:
- population: General population (complete IgM deficiency)
measure_type: POINT_PREVALENCE
prevalence_class: ABOVE_1_IN_1000
rate_per_100000: 30.0
notes: >-
0.03%, normalised to 30 per 100,000. This is complete IgM deficiency in the
general population, which is a narrower phenotype than either diagnostic
definition selects.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41009569
reference_title: "Expanding the Spectrum of Selective IgM Deficiency: From Infections to Immune Dysregulation."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "an estimated prevalence ranging from 0.03% (complete IgM deficiency) in the general population to 0.07–2.1% in immunology clinics"
explanation: >-
Source of both the general-population and the clinic figures.
quote_role: BACKGROUND
- population: Immunology clinic attenders
measure_type: POINT_PREVALENCE
prevalence_class: ABOVE_1_IN_1000
rate_per_100000: 70.0
rate_low: 70.0
rate_high: 2100.0
notes: >-
0.07-2.1%, normalised to 70-2100 per 100,000. The thirtyfold spread within a
single sentence is itself the finding: this is a referred population, and
the range reflects differing criteria and referral patterns rather than
differing biology. Not comparable with the general-population figure above.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41009569
reference_title: "Expanding the Spectrum of Selective IgM Deficiency: From Infections to Immune Dysregulation."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "an estimated prevalence ranging from 0.03% (complete IgM deficiency) in the general population to 0.07–2.1% in immunology clinics"
explanation: >-
Source of the clinic-population range.
quote_role: BACKGROUND
biochemical:
- name: Serum IgM
presence: DECREASED
biomarker_term:
preferred_term: Decreased serum IgM
term:
id: HP:0002850
label: Decreased circulating total IgM
notes: >-
The defining measurement. Mean serum IgM was 33 mg/dL in a 48-patient
pediatric cohort. IgM concentration is not static over time: longitudinal
analysis distinguishes chronic, intermittent, progressive and resolved
courses, so a single measurement may not describe the patient's state.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37728524
reference_title: "Clinical and immunological phenotypes of selective IgM deficiency in children: Results from a multicenter study."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Forty-eight patients with SIgMD were included (mean serum IgM: 33 mg/dL)."
explanation: >-
Gives the measured mean in a defined cohort.
- reference: PMID:41009569
reference_title: "Expanding the Spectrum of Selective IgM Deficiency: From Infections to Immune Dysregulation."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Longitudinal analysis revealed a dynamic course of IgM concentrations over time, allowing classification into chronic, intermittent, progressive, and resolved subtypes."
explanation: >-
Shows the defining measurement is not stable within a patient, which bears
directly on whether a single-timepoint criterion can define an entity.
- name: Serum IgG and IgA
presence: NORMAL
notes: >-
Preservation of the other isotypes is what makes the deficiency selective,
and is required by both definitions. Not permanently guaranteed: in a
pediatric cohort with long-term follow-up, 87% preserved the diagnosis while
two patients went on to develop reduced IgA as well.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37728524
reference_title: "Clinical and immunological phenotypes of selective IgM deficiency in children: Results from a multicenter study."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Sixteen patients had long-term follow-up, during which 87% preserved their SIgMD diagnosis, while two patients showed a reduction in IgA in addition to low IgM."
explanation: >-
Quantifies diagnostic stability over follow-up and names the mode of
transition out of the category.
- name: Isohemagglutinin titers
presence: DECREASED
notes: >-
Very low in every patient tested in a 17-patient cohort and in 18 of 21
published cases. This is a functional readout of natural-antibody capacity,
which is IgM's characteristic role, so it is the laboratory correlate that
sits closest to the defining deficit without asserting a mechanism for it.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:28730517
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Clinical and Laboratory Features of 17 Patients and a Review of the Literature."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "We found that some patients in our cohort (OC) and published cases (PC) had increased IgE levels (OC 7/15; PC 21/37), decreased IgG4 levels (OC 5/14), very low titers of isohemagglutinins (OC 8/8; PC 18/21), increased transitional B cell counts (OC 8/9), decreased marginal zone B cell counts (OC 8/9), and increased 21low B cell counts (OC 7/9)."
explanation: >-
Reports the isohemagglutinin result alongside the other laboratory
correlates, with per-patient denominators.
- name: Marginal zone B cells
presence: DECREASED
notes: >-
Decreased in 8 of 9 tested. Marginal zone B cells are a principal source of
natural IgM, so the association is suggestive - but the source's own
conclusion is that the pathogenic mechanism remains unclear, and this entry
does not curate the inference as a mechanism.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:28730517
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Clinical and Laboratory Features of 17 Patients and a Review of the Literature."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "We found that some patients in our cohort (OC) and published cases (PC) had increased IgE levels (OC 7/15; PC 21/37), decreased IgG4 levels (OC 5/14), very low titers of isohemagglutinins (OC 8/8; PC 18/21), increased transitional B cell counts (OC 8/9), decreased marginal zone B cell counts (OC 8/9), and increased 21low B cell counts (OC 7/9)."
explanation: >-
Reports the marginal zone B cell reduction with its denominator.
- name: Transitional and CD21low B cells
presence: INCREASED
notes: >-
Both increased in 7-8 of 9 tested. Recorded as reproducible laboratory
correlates of the entity, not as steps in a pathway.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:28730517
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Clinical and Laboratory Features of 17 Patients and a Review of the Literature."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "We found that some patients in our cohort (OC) and published cases (PC) had increased IgE levels (OC 7/15; PC 21/37), decreased IgG4 levels (OC 5/14), very low titers of isohemagglutinins (OC 8/8; PC 18/21), increased transitional B cell counts (OC 8/9), decreased marginal zone B cell counts (OC 8/9), and increased 21low B cell counts (OC 7/9)."
explanation: >-
Reports both B cell subset increases with their denominators.
- name: Serum IgE
presence: INCREASED
notes: >-
Raised in roughly half of those tested in both the cohort and the published
cases. Consistent with the atopic manifestations that dominate the adult
clinical picture.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:28730517
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Clinical and Laboratory Features of 17 Patients and a Review of the Literature."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "We found that some patients in our cohort (OC) and published cases (PC) had increased IgE levels (OC 7/15; PC 21/37), decreased IgG4 levels (OC 5/14), very low titers of isohemagglutinins (OC 8/8; PC 18/21), increased transitional B cell counts (OC 8/9), decreased marginal zone B cell counts (OC 8/9), and increased 21low B cell counts (OC 7/9)."
explanation: >-
Reports the IgE elevation in both the authors' cohort and the reviewed
published cases.
treatments:
- name: Prophylactic Antibiotics
therapeutic_modality: SMALL_MOLECULE
description: >-
Continuous or intermittent antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with recurrent
infection. Listed by the defining review as its own intervention, separate
from treating an acute febrile episode, and stated without the hedging it
applies to immunoglobulin replacement. There is no treatment for the IgM
deficiency itself.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: antibiotic therapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15620
label: Antibiotic Therapy
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "Prophylactic antibiotics and the prompt treatment of febrile illness are crucial."
explanation: >-
The review's unhedged statement, covering prophylaxis - the half this
record is scoped to. The same sentence supports the separate
prompt-treatment record below, which Table 6 lists as its own row.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
- name: Prompt Treatment of Febrile Illness
therapeutic_modality: SMALL_MOLECULE
description: >-
Early antimicrobial treatment of an acute febrile episode rather than
watchful waiting. Table 6 lists this separately from prophylaxis, and the
distinction is real: one reduces the rate of infection, the other limits the
consequences of an infection already under way. Its Notes cell is empty, so
the review gives no further qualification.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: antibiotic therapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15620
label: Antibiotic Therapy
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "Prophylactic antibiotics and the prompt treatment of febrile illness are crucial."
explanation: >-
The same unhedged sentence, covering the prompt-treatment half.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
- name: Immunoglobulin Replacement (Restricted Indication)
therapeutic_modality: OTHER
description: >-
Not routine therapy. It is recommended only for patients with significantly
associated antibody deficiency or with recurrent or severe infections - so
the indication is for the associated antibody defect, not for the IgM
deficiency, which immunoglobulin products do not correct. Where it is given
on that restricted indication, response is reported.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: immunoglobulin therapy
term:
id: NCIT:C62710
label: Immunoglobulin Therapy
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "for most SIgMD patients, Ig replacement therapy (IgGRT) is not required"
explanation: >-
The first half of the restriction: not indicated for the majority. Quoted
as a span rather than the whole sentence because the sentence carries an
inline citation marker that the reference validator normalizes away.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "it may be recommended for patients with significantly associated antibody deficiency or recurrent or severe infections"
explanation: >-
The second half: the named subgroup for whom it is recommended. This is
what the treatment record is scoped to.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
- reference: PMID:31970029
reference_title: "Comprehensive clinical and immunological features of 62 adult patients with selective primary IgM deficiency."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Eighteen (66%) of 27 patients with specific antibody deficiency received immunoglobulin therapy and almost all subjects responded to immunoglobulin therapy by decreased frequency of infections."
explanation: >-
The observed response in the restricted-indication subgroup. Uncontrolled
and retrospective, which is why the trial-data gap discussion stands.
- name: Vaccination
therapeutic_modality: VACCINE
description: >-
Listed among the interventions that may benefit SIgMD patients. Note the
entry's own diagnostic section records impaired specific antibody responses
in part of this population, so vaccination is offered without an assumption
that the response will be normal.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: vaccination
term:
id: NCIT:C15346
label: Vaccination
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "| Vaccination | Before the administration of attenuated vaccines, an evaluation of T cell function is advised. |"
explanation: >-
The vaccination row itself, which also carries the safety qualification
that matters clinically: attenuated vaccines warrant T cell assessment
first. Graded OTHER and REVIEW_SYNTHESIS because it is a review's
compilation rather than a trial result.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
- name: Management of Atopic Disease
therapeutic_modality: OTHER
description: >-
Allergic rhinitis and asthma are the two most frequent manifestations in
adult series, ahead of infection, so managing them is a substantial part of
care rather than an incidental comorbidity.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: supportive care
term:
id: NCIT:C15747
label: Supportive Care
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "| Management of atopic diseases | May be helpful in reducing the incidence of complicating sinopulmonary infections. |"
explanation: >-
The atopy row, which gives the reason as well as the recommendation:
managing atopic disease is expected to reduce complicating sinopulmonary
infection, so it bears on the infection burden rather than only on
comfort.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
differential_diagnoses:
- name: Secondary IgM deficiency
description: >-
Protein-losing enteropathy, nephrotic syndrome and malignancy all lower
serum IgM and must be excluded before a primary deficiency is diagnosed.
This exclusion holds under both diagnostic definitions.
- name: Common variable immunodeficiency
description: >-
Low IgM can be the first isotype abnormality in evolving CVID. Follow-up is
advised for exactly this reason, and the 75-patient series names CVID among
the conditions patients may develop.
- name: Another inborn error of immunity with low IgM as a feature
description: >-
The most consequential differential, because it is common rather than rare:
26% of a pediatric cohort with isolated IgM deficiency received a molecular
diagnosis of a nameable IEI on testing, several of them without recurrent
infections. Low IgM without a molecular diagnosis may mean the testing has
not been done.
- name: Chromosomal disorder with associated IgM deficiency
description: >-
Chromosomopathies accounted for 16.2% of one arm of the 75-patient series,
prompting the authors to recommend measuring serum IgM in those patients.
discussions:
- discussion_id: sigmd_no_mechanism
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
attaches_to:
- pathophysiology#Persistently Reduced Serum IgM
prompt: >-
What causes selective IgM deficiency?
rationale: >-
Nothing upstream of the reduced IgM concentration is established. No gene,
no cellular defect in B-cell terminal differentiation, and no regulatory
mechanism has been shown to cause it, and the reviews say so in those terms.
This entry therefore carries a single pathophysiology node with no parent,
which is unusual for dismech and is the honest representation. Candidate
mechanisms appear in the literature as speculation rather than as findings,
and are deliberately not curated as nodes here: a plausible-looking chain
with no evidence behind it would be worse than the gap, because it would
look like knowledge.
- discussion_id: sigmd_is_it_one_entity
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
attaches_to:
- definitions#IUIS definition
- definitions#ESID working definition
prompt: >-
Is selective IgM deficiency one disease, a heterogeneous phenotype, or a
laboratory finding?
rationale: >-
Three findings push against treating this as a single entity. The two
diagnostic definitions in use disagree, and the 75-patient study that
applied both to the same population found they select measurably different
clinical profiles. IgM concentration is dynamic within a patient — chronic,
intermittent, progressive and resolved courses are distinguishable — so a
single-timepoint criterion does not identify a stable group. And 26% of one
isolated-IgM-deficiency cohort had a different, nameable IEI on molecular
testing, several without the infections the ESID definition requires. The
2025 study concludes directly that a redefinition is warranted. Whether
dismech should keep this as a Disease entry, or record it as a laboratory
finding pending redefinition, follows from how that question resolves; it is
curated as a Disease here on the strength of its IUIS classification and its
reproducible phenotype associations, not on a mechanism.
- discussion_id: sigmd_infection_requirement
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
attaches_to:
- phenotypes#Allergic Rhinitis
- phenotypes#Asthma
- phenotypes#Recurrent Respiratory Infection
prompt: >-
Should infection be a diagnostic criterion when allergy is the more frequent
manifestation?
rationale: >-
The ESID definition requires infections. In the 75-patient series allergic
rhinitis and asthma were more frequent than pulmonary infection under both
criteria sets, and the 2025 cohort found cytopenia, lymphoproliferation,
autoimmunity, allergy and inflammation similarly distributed in patients
with and without infections. If the non-infectious manifestations are
equally characteristic, an infection-requiring definition selects a subset
for reasons of history rather than of biology, and systematically hides the
rest.
- discussion_id: sigmd_no_curated_treatments
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
attaches_to:
- treatments#
prompt: >-
Is there trial evidence for any treatment directed at selective IgM
deficiency?
rationale: >-
Four interventions are now curated, all from a review's compilation of what
may benefit these patients, and none of them from a trial. The review says
in as many words that no conclusive data on correct therapeutic management
are available. So what is missing is not a described intervention - the
earlier version of this discussion claimed that, and was wrong - but a
controlled comparison of any of them. Note also that none of the four is
directed at the IgM deficit itself: antibiotics and vaccination address
infection risk, immunoglobulin replacement addresses an associated antibody
deficiency where one is present, and atopy management addresses the
commonest manifestations. A treatment that raises IgM, or that is shown to
change outcome in an unselected SIgMD population, does not exist.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37685399
reference_title: "Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "No conclusive data on the correct therapeutic management of SIgMD are available."
explanation: >-
The statement of the gap, from the same review that supplies the four
curated interventions.
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
notes: >-
`category: Acquired` rather than `Mendelian`, which is a deliberate departure
from the seed value. No gene is established, MONDO records no causal gene for
MONDO:0018039, and `Mendelian` would assert an inheritance model the
literature explicitly says is not known.
This entry has one pathophysiology node and it has no upstream parent. That is
the finding, not an incomplete curation. The claim issue for this disease
(#11867) anticipated that the honest outcome might be `OUT_OF_SCOPE`. It is
curated as a Disease instead, on two grounds: the IUIS has classified it among
the predominantly antibody deficiencies since 2017, and the phenotype
associations reproduce across independent cohorts. The counter-argument is
recorded as a discussion rather than settled here, because it turns on a
redefinition the field has called for and not yet made.
Candidate mechanisms — defective B-cell terminal differentiation,
regulatory-T-cell suppression of IgM synthesis, and impaired
class-switch-independent secretion — are deliberately absent from the
pathograph. They appear in the literature as speculation, and a node without
evidence behind it reads as knowledge once it is in the graph.
`quote_role` is used heavily here and carries real weight in this entry. Four
items are `BACKGROUND` or `REVIEW_SYNTHESIS` because much of what can be said
about this entity comes from narrative reviews rather than from primary
series. Without the marker, `evidence_source: OTHER` alone would not
distinguish "a review synthesising others' work" from "a study whose design
does not fit the enum", and for a disease whose evidence base is this thin
that distinction is most of the information.
The two prevalence records are not comparable and are deliberately kept
separate rather than merged into a range. One is complete IgM deficiency in
the general population; the other is a referred immunology-clinic population
under varying criteria, whose own quoted range spans thirtyfold.
The 67% recurrent-infection figure from PMID:37728524 is infection at any
site, not respiratory specifically, and the phenotype description says so. The
phenotype it is attached to is the respiratory one because that is what the
reviews identify as the main manifestation; a curator wanting a
respiratory-specific denominator should use the 27.0%/21.1% pulmonary figures
from PMID:39680289 instead.
Deep research results are used as seeds for research; they do not undergo the same validation as the main records and may contain errors. How we use deep research.
Definition and current understanding
Selective IgM deficiency (sIgMD; also “selective immunoglobulin M deficiency,” “selective IgM immunodeficiency,” “primary selective IgM deficiency”) is defined as a persistent reduction of serum IgM below two standard deviations (SD) of the age‑adjusted mean (or absolute values <0.20 g/L in children and <0.30 g/L in adults) with normal serum IgG and IgA, and without evidence of other primary or secondary immunodeficiencies.[5][11][12] The IUIS criteria emphasize “absent serum IgM with preserved IgG and IgA concentrations” for the most stringent form.[7][9]
The Diagnostics 2023 review summarizes the consensus: sIgMD is an isolated IgM deficiency, often detected during evaluation for recurrent infections, allergy, or autoimmunity, but sometimes found incidentally.[1][9][12] Many patients show normal lymphocyte numbers and basic function, and a subset demonstrates normal specific antibody responses, highlighting substantial heterogeneity.[3][5][12]
Key identifiers
Common synonyms/alternative names
Data source type
Most information derives from:
- Aggregated disease‑level resources (expert society handbooks and web resources from primary immunodeficiency organizations).[4][6][10]
- Case series and cohort studies (e.g., 62 adult patients; 2019; Pediatrics and allergy multicenter cohort in children).[2][8][15]
- Narrative and systematic reviews synthesizing published clinical cases and immunologic investigations.[1][5][11][12]
No large, EHR‑based epidemiologic datasets were identified; current knowledge is largely based on referred cohorts and specialist centers.[1][5][8][12]
Genetic and mechanistic factors
The pathogenesis of sIgMD is currently unclear and appears heterogeneous.[5][12] The 2013 review notes:
“The pathogenesis of selective IgM deficiency is unclear; decreased T helper activity, increased isotype-specific suppressor T cell activity, and intrinsic B cell defects have been reported.”[12] (PMID:23760686)
Several lines of evidence:
“Selective IgM deficiency, in some cases, is associated with 22q11.2 chromosome deletion and few familial cases of selective IgM deficiency have been reported.”[12]
B‑cell intrinsic abnormalities
Detailed immunophenotyping found increased transitional B cells, decreased marginal zone B cells, and increased CD21^low B cells, suggesting disturbed peripheral B‑cell maturation and regulatory B‑cell subsets.[3]
T‑cell and regulatory defects (in a subset)
Taken together, sIgMD likely represents a phenotypic endpoint (low serum IgM) arising from diverse upstream immunologic defects rather than a single Mendelian gene defect in most cases.[1][5][12]
Genetic risk factors
No genome‑wide association studies, ClinVar‑annotated monogenic variants, or ClinGen curated loci specific for sIgMD were reported in the 2017 and 2023 reviews.[1][5][12] Evidence for a clear Mendelian inheritance pattern is therefore weak.
Environmental and clinical risk factors
The available literature does not identify classical environmental risk factors (toxins, occupational exposures) for developing sIgMD.[1][5][12] Reported associations are more likely consequences or comorbidities (e.g., infections, autoimmunity) than proven risk factors.
No genetic or environmental protective factors (variants conferring resistance, or lifestyle exposures reducing risk) have been described specifically for sIgMD in recent reviews or cohort studies.[1][5][12] The field generally treats sIgMD as a fixed immunologic state rather than a risk‑modifiable condition.
No direct gene–environment interaction studies (e.g., formal G×E analyses) are available for sIgMD.[1][5] Conceptually, impaired IgM‑mediated early responses to pathogens may interact with environmental pathogen exposure to determine infection burden, but this is inferred from immunologic principles rather than demonstrated in sIgMD‑specific G×E studies.[5][12]
Infection‑related phenotypes (symptoms/signs/laboratory)
Adult cohort of 62 patients (human clinical study, 2019):
“The majority of patients presented with recurrent and chronic upper and lower respiratory tract infections (73%), most often with recurrent sinusitis (29%), bronchitis (33%), pneumonia (21%), and recurrent urinary tract infections (16%).”[8] (PMID:31970029)
Primary immunodeficiency organization materials similarly state that symptomatic individuals predominantly have bacterial infections.[6][10][12]
Common infection phenotypes and suggested HPO terms:
Quality of life impact: recurrent respiratory infections impair school/work attendance and daily functioning.[6][8][10][12]
Bronchitis (HP:0002776) and pneumonia (HP:0002090)
May progress to chronic bronchial disease or structural lung damage in some cases.[5][8][12]
Recurrent urinary tract infections – HP:0000010
Usually episodic; severity variable.[8][12]
Serious invasive infections: meningitis (HP:0004270), sepsis (HP:0100806), cellulitis, osteomyelitis
Allergic/atopic phenotypes (symptoms/signs)
Adult and mixed cohorts show high rates of allergic disease:
“Approximately 35% of patients had atopic diseases, including allergic rhinitis and asthma.”[8]
Patient handbook and 2025 educational materials report:
“Almost 40% of individuals with Selective IgM Deficiency have allergic diseases including hay fever and asthma.”[6]
“Allergic diseases – 25–35%.”[10]
Main atopic phenotypes and HPO terms:
Frequency among symptomatic individuals: roughly 25–40%.[6][8][10]
Severity: usually mild to moderate; occasionally persistent, requiring standard allergy/asthma management.[6][8][10]
Quality of life: chronic allergic symptoms add to infection burden and may further impair daily activities.[6][8][10]
Autoimmune phenotypes (clinical signs/disease entities)
Reviews highlight a notable association with autoimmunity:
“Selective IgM deficiency… is associated with infections, allergic diseases, and autoimmune diseases.”[12]
Educational materials summarize:
“Autoimmune diseases – 25–40%.”[10]
Specific autoimmune conditions reported across case series/reviews include systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, immune thrombocytopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmune thyroiditis, and celiac disease.[5][11][12] (human case series and narrative reviews).
Suggested HPO terms:
Frequency: ~25–40% among symptomatic sIgMD patients.[5][10][12]
Course: chronic with flares; may require immunosuppressive therapy.[5][11][12]
Quality of life: substantial impact due to chronic pain, fatigue, organ involvement, and treatment side effects.[5][11][12]
Asymptomatic phenotype
Both the handbook and slides emphasize that many individuals are asymptomatic:
“Individuals with Selective IgM Deficiency, partial or complete, may not have any symptoms, and therefore, are unrecognized or undiagnosed.”[6]
“Selective IgM deficiency may be symptomatic or asymptomatic (50%).”[10]
Phenotype:
Key laboratory features (human immunologic studies):
Adult cohort: strictly defined low IgM with normal IgG/A; some had decreased IgG4 (5/14).[3]
Isohemagglutinins and specific antibodies
A subset has impaired IgG antibody responses to pneumococcal polysaccharides.[3][12]
B‑cell subsets
“We found that some patients in our cohort (OC) and published cases (PC) had increased transitional B cell counts (OC 8/9), decreased marginal zone B cell counts (OC 8/9), and increased CD21^low B cell counts (OC 7/9).”[3] (PMID:28730517)
Suggested HPO and LOINC terms:
No single gene has been definitively established as causative for isolated sIgMD in the majority of patients.[1][5][12] Reviews explicitly state that sIgMD is not yet linked to specific high‑penetrance Mendelian mutations, in contrast to many other primary immunodeficiencies.[1][5]
Chromosomal abnormalities
B‑cell developmental/functional abnormalities
Functional and phenotypic data (human clinical and in vitro):
These findings support a model of B‑cell intrinsic dysfunction, but no specific mutation (e.g., in BCR‑signaling genes) has been consistently identified.[3][5][12]
The literature does not identify specific environmental, occupational, or toxic exposures causing sIgMD.[1][5][12] Reported infections, allergies, and autoimmune conditions appear to be consequences of the immunodeficiency rather than causal exposures.[5][6][8][12]
Lifestyle factors (smoking, diet, exercise) and infectious agents are relevant for overall infection risk but have not been shown to determine the presence vs absence of sIgMD.[1][5][12]
Upstream mechanisms: steps 1–3 (B‑cell and regulatory defects, IgM deficiency).
Downstream mechanisms: steps 4–7 (infection susceptibility, autoimmunity, chronic inflammation, progression).
Immune system involvement
Evidence quote:
“Innate immunity is relatively intact. T cells, T cell subsets, and T cell functions are normal. However, several patients with selective IgM deficiency and T cell and NK cell defects with Mycobacterium avium intracellulare infections have been reported.”[12]
Cellular processes and protein dysfunction
Complement and opsonization (inferred from IgM biology)
Autoimmunity and chronic inflammation
Cell types (CL terms)
Primary organs/body systems:
Secondary involvement:
Infections typically involve bilateral respiratory structures (e.g., both lungs) and are not characteristically lateralized.[6][8][10][12] Autoimmune manifestations follow disease‑specific patterns (e.g., symmetric arthritis in RA).[5][11][12]
Diagnostic criteria (summarized from crossroad review, handbook, and IUIS):
“Selective IgM deficiency (sIgMD) is an immunodeficiency characterised by low serum IgM levels (<0.20 g/L in children and <0.30 g/L in adults or <2 SD below the age-adjusted mean), alongside normal number and function of B and T lymphocytes, normal serum IgG and IgA levels (the IgE levels can be increased) and without other identifiable immunodeficiency.”[11]
Primary immunodeficiency resources add:
“The diagnosis of partial selective IgM deficiency is made if the serum IgM level is below two standard deviations of the mean for age-matched controls. Complete selective IgM deficiency is diagnosed with serum IgM levels <5 mg/dl.”[4][6]
Key diagnostic steps:
Evaluate IgG subclasses (e.g., IgG4) and IgE as they may show abnormalities.[3][11][12]
Specific antibody testing
Measure isohemagglutinins (often very low) and responses to protein/polysaccharide vaccines (e.g., pneumococcal) to assess functional antibody production.[3][5][12]
Lymphocyte subset analysis
B‑cell, T‑cell, and NK‑cell counts; B‑cell subset phenotyping can reveal characteristic changes (transitional, marginal zone, CD21^low).[3][12]
Exclusion of secondary causes
Suggested LOINC terms: serum IgM, IgG, IgA, IgE tests; lymphocyte subset panels.
Because no specific causative gene is known, routine genetic testing for sIgMD is not standardized:
No established RNA‑seq, proteomic, or metabolomic diagnostic signatures specific to sIgMD have been reported.[1][5]
Clinical criteria:
Differential diagnoses:
Screening:
No large survival or mortality datasets exist specifically for sIgMD.[1][5] Available information suggests:
Validated QOL measures (EQ‑5D, SF‑36) have not been specifically reported for sIgMD; impact is inferred from clinical burden.[1][5][8][12]
Common complications:
Recovery potential:
Prognostic factors (inferred):
There is no IgM‑specific replacement product; treatment focuses on infection prophylaxis, immunoglobulin replacement (IgG) when indicated, and management of comorbid allergy/autoimmunity.[5][6][12]
1. Infection management and prophylaxis
2. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IVIG/SCIG)
“Specific IgG antibody responses against pneumococcus polysaccharides are impaired in a subset of patients with selective IgM deficiency.”[12]
For patients with concomitant specific antibody deficiency (e.g., poor response to polysaccharide vaccines) and recurrent serious infections:
3. Management of allergic disease
4. Management of autoimmunity
Evidence is mostly case‑based:
Primary prevention
Secondary prevention (early detection)
Tertiary prevention (complication prevention)
The reviewed human‑focused literature does not describe naturally occurring selective IgM deficiency as a defined veterinary syndrome in other species.[1][5][12] IgM deficiency models in animals (e.g., IgM‑knockout mice) exist as experimental tools but are not discussed in detail in the sIgMD clinical reviews.[1][5]
No dedicated, clinically oriented model organism of “selective IgM deficiency” mirroring the human syndrome is described in the clinical reviews.[1][5][12] Experimental IgM‑deficient mice have been used more broadly to study IgM function (e.g., complement activation, early immune responses), but these are not yet integrated into a formal sIgMD disease model framework in the human clinical literature.[1][5]
Below are selected abstract quotes with PMIDs that directly support major claims:
“The most common clinical manifestation of selective IgM deficiency is infections with extracellular and intracellular bacteria, viruses, and fungi… Selective IgM deficiency, in some cases, is associated with 22q11.2 chromosome deletion and few familial cases of selective IgM deficiency have been reported… In a subset of patients with selective IgM deficiency circulating IgM+ B cells are decreased or completely lacking. Specific IgG antibody responses against pneumococcus polysaccharides are impaired in a subset of patients… The pathogenesis of selective IgM deficiency is unclear; decreased T helper activity, increased isotype-specific suppressor T cell activity, and intrinsic B cell defects have been reported.”[12] (PMID:23760686)
“The majority of patients presented with recurrent and chronic upper and lower respiratory tract infections (73%), most often with recurrent sinusitis (29%), bronchitis (33%), pneumonia (21%), and recurrent urinary tract infections (16%). Approximately 35% of patients had atopic diseases, including allergic rhinitis and asthma.”[8] (PMID:31970029)
“We found that some patients in our cohort (OC) and published cases (PC) had increased transitional B cell counts (OC 8/9), decreased marginal zone B cell counts (OC 8/9), and increased CD21^low B cell counts (OC 7/9)… A majority of the patients had normal antibody production to protein and polysaccharide antigens, basic lymphocyte subset counts, and expression of surface IgM molecules on B cells.”[3] (PMID:28730517)
“Selective IgM deficiency (sIgMD) is an immunodeficiency characterised by low serum IgM levels (<0.20 g/L in children and <0.30 g/L in adults or <2 SD below the age-adjusted mean), alongside normal number and function of B and T lymphocytes, normal serum IgG and IgA levels (the IgE levels can be increased) and without other identifiable immunodeficiency.”[11]
“Individuals with Selective IgM Deficiency have low levels or lack immunoglobulin M (IgM) but have normal levels of IgA, and IgG. These individuals may have no illness, whereas others develop a variety of illnesses including infections, allergy, and autoimmunity… Individuals with Selective IgM Deficiency, partial or complete, may not have any symptoms… Those individuals who do have symptoms commonly suffer from infections, allergies, and autoimmune diseases… Of those who are symptomatic, approximately 80% present with predominant bacterial infections… Almost 40% of individuals with Selective IgM Deficiency have allergic diseases including hay fever and asthma.”[6]
“Selective IgM deficiency may be symptomatic or asymptomatic (50%). Most common clinical presentations in symptomatic patients are: Infections – 80%; Allergic diseases – 25–35%; Autoimmune diseases – 25–40%… Infections: Upper respiratory tract infections, Otitis media, Sinusitis, Bronchitis, Pneumonia, Meningitis, Recurrent UTI, Pyelonephritis, Recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis, Sepsis… Allergic rhinitis, Allergic asthma, Atopic dermatitis, Angioedema.”[10]
These evidence items, combined with the ontology suggestions above (HPO, GO, CL, UBERON, NCIT, MONDO), provide a structured basis for populating a disease knowledge base entry for selective IgM deficiency.
Checked with linkml-reference-validator 0.2.1.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| References checked | 8 |
| Resolved | 8 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| References weighed for topical relevance | 8 |
| On topic | 7 |
| Off topic | 0 |
All extracted references resolved successfully.
Checked with linkml-term-validator 0.4.5, through the ols: adapter.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| Terms checked | 54 |
| Resolved | 50 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 4 |
| Obsolete | 0 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| Terms whose name was checked | 27 |
| Terms named correctly | 13 |
| Terms named as a different term | 11 |
| Terms whose name is worth a second look | 3 |
These identifiers resolve, so nothing about them looks wrong, and the ontology calls them something unrelated to what the report calls them. That usually means the identifier is not the one the sentence needs:
HP:0002318 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Typical manifestations: chronic sinusitis"; HP calls it Cervical myelopathyHP:0031800 (1 mention) - the report calls it "abnormal B cell morphology/phenotype"; HP calls it Elevated circulating apolipoprotein A-II concentrationGO:0002283 (1 mention) - the report calls it "marginal zone B cell differentiation"; GO calls it neutrophil activation involved in immune responseUBERON:0002048 (1 mention) - the report calls it "spleen"; UBERON calls it lungUBERON:0001961 (1 mention) - the report calls it "bone marrow"; UBERON calls it mucosa-associated lymphoid tissueUBERON:0001825 (1 mention) - the report calls it "upper respiratory tract"; UBERON calls it paranasal sinusUBERON:0001043 (1 mention) - the report calls it "lung"; UBERON calls it esophagusNCIT:C16070 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "NCIT: antibiotic prophylaxis", "Prophylactic antibiotics"; NCIT calls it Prostate Cancer Prevention TrialNCIT:C3443 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "NCIT: immunoglobulin therapy"; NCIT calls it Vulvar NeoplasmNCIT:C28784 (1 mention) - the report calls it "NCIT terms: antiallergic agent"; NCIT calls it 27-35(27L):MART-1 PeptideNCIT:C1202 (1 mention) - the report calls it "NCIT terms: immunosuppressive agent"; NCIT calls it Prednisolone AcetateThese identifiers do not exist in an ontology that resolved other terms from the same prefix, so they were most likely invented:
HP:0002776 (1 mention), reported as "Bronchitis" - HP does not contain this termHP:0004270 (1 mention), reported as "Serious invasive infections: meningitis" - HP does not contain this termHP:0003822 (1 mention), reported as "asymptomatic" - HP does not contain this termHP:0002713 (1 mention) - HP does not contain this termThe report's name for these is recognisably related to the term's own name without being one of them. A loose paraphrase reads the same way as a citation of the wrong sibling term - and so does a related synonym, which the ontology records precisely because it names something adjacent rather than the same thing - so these are listed rather than judged:
GO:0002718 (1 mention) - the report calls it "negative regulation of immune system process"; GO calls it regulation of cytokine production involved in immune response, and lists "regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process involved in immune response" among its other namesGO:0005788 (1 mention) - the report calls it "endoplasmic reticulum"; GO calls it endoplasmic reticulum lumenNCIT:C281 (1 mention) - the report calls it "NCIT: anti‑infective agent"; NCIT calls it Antiviral AgentThe report gives these identifiers more than one name of its own:
NCIT:C16070 - called "NCIT: antibiotic prophylaxis", "Prophylactic antibiotics"