Propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare, frequently fatal multi-organ toxicity of high-dose, prolonged propofol sedation. The defining presentation is acute refractory bradycardia progressing toward asystole, accompanied by some combination of unexplained metabolic or lactic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalemia, hyperlipidemia, hepatomegaly, renal failure and rapidly progressive cardiac failure. The proposed mechanism is impairment of mitochondrial energy metabolism by propofol, through inhibition of the respiratory chain, uncoupling by proton leak, and a defect of fatty acid oxidation, which together starve tissues with high oxidative demand. Because the electrocardiogram in PRIS can show coved ST elevation in the right precordial leads, the syndrome is also the clinical setting in which the term Brugada phenocopy was first used. This entry models the toxic syndrome rather than propofol sedation in general or every adverse effect of the drug.
Ask a research question about Propofol Infusion Syndrome. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
Conditions with similar clinical presentations that must be differentiated from Propofol Infusion Syndrome:
name: Propofol Infusion Syndrome
creation_date: "2026-09-29T00:00:00Z"
category: Environmental
categories:
- Toxic Exposure Disorder
- Adverse Drug Reaction
- Acquired Mitochondrial Dysfunction
description: >-
Propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare, frequently fatal multi-organ
toxicity of high-dose, prolonged propofol sedation. The defining presentation
is acute refractory bradycardia progressing toward asystole, accompanied by
some combination of unexplained metabolic or lactic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis,
hyperkalemia, hyperlipidemia, hepatomegaly, renal failure and rapidly
progressive cardiac failure. The proposed mechanism is impairment of
mitochondrial energy metabolism by propofol, through inhibition of the
respiratory chain, uncoupling by proton leak, and a defect of fatty acid
oxidation, which together starve tissues with high oxidative demand. Because
the electrocardiogram in PRIS can show coved ST elevation in the right
precordial leads, the syndrome is also the clinical setting in which the term
Brugada phenocopy was first used. This entry models the toxic syndrome rather
than propofol sedation in general or every adverse effect of the drug.
synonyms:
- PRIS
- propofol-related infusion syndrome
parents:
- adverse drug reaction
- drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity
notes: >-
No ontology term for this syndrome was found, so no disease_term is asserted.
MONDO was searched through the configured ols:mondo adapter with
`search l~propofol` and with free-text searches for "propofol" and "propofol
infusion syndrome"; all three returned nothing, against a positive control on
`l~Brugada` that returns the expected Brugada syndrome terms. NCIT
(`ols:ncit`, `search l^propofol`) holds only the drug, NCIT:C29384 Propofol.
No cached Orphanet leaf record mentions propofol. MeSH, by contrast, does code
the syndrome, as the supplementary concept D000072736 "Propofol Infusion
Syndrome" (verified through the NCBI MeSH database; note that a supplementary
concept record is retrieved by its own UID, 2016775, not by the 68-prefixed
form that works for descriptors). dismech has no MeSH mapping slot, so that
identifier is recorded here rather than under mappings. A MONDO term request is
a reasonable follow-up; its required parent field is a nosology judgement that
has not been made, because classifying by cause places the syndrome with drug
toxicities while classifying by manifestation places it with acquired
multi-system metabolic disease. See issue #13101.
No conforms_to is declared. The two closest mechanism modules were read and
neither fits. `mitochondrial_dysfunction` scopes itself to the hallmark of
aging, and its chain begins at mitochondrial damage with mtDNA mutation and
passes through impaired mitophagy, neither of which this acute
pharmacological inhibition has. `metabolic_intoxication_decompensation`
scopes itself to intoxication-type inborn errors with a deficient enzyme or
transporter, where the block here is reversible drug inhibition in a
previously normal pathway. A drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity module would
be a new module rather than a second use of either.
classifications:
harrisons_chapter:
- classification_value: POISONING_ENVENOMATION
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
There is an association between PRIS and propofol infusions at doses
higher than 4 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) for greater than 48 h duration.
explanation: >-
The syndrome is a dose- and duration-related toxicity of a drug rather
than a disease of independent origin, which places it in the poisoning
and drug-overdose chapter.
- classification_value: CRITICAL_CARE
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
In 138 cases (90 %) patients developed PRIS as a complication of
non-procedural sedation in ICUs and in 15 cases (10 %) as a complication
of the use of propofol during anaesthesia.
explanation: >-
Nine in ten reported cases arose during intensive-care sedation rather
than anaesthesia, which places the syndrome in the critical-care chapter
as well as the poisoning one.
definitions:
- name: Classic PRIS case definition
definition_type: CASE_DEFINITION
derivation_basis: ESTABLISHED_CRITERIA
description: >-
Acute refractory bradycardia progressing to asystole, together with at least
one of metabolic acidosis with a base deficit above 10 mmol/L,
rhabdomyolysis, hyperlipidemia, or an enlarged or fatty liver, in a patient
receiving propofol.
notes: >-
Recorded as a case definition rather than consensus diagnostic criteria,
because the structured review of 153 published cases states that no widely
accepted definition exists and that reported cases describe varying
combinations of features.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
The clinical features of propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) are acute
refractory bradycardia leading to asystole, in the presence of one or more
of the following: metabolic acidosis (base deficit > 10 mmol.l(-1)),
rhabdomyolysis, hyperlipidaemia, and enlarged or fatty liver.
explanation: The source of the feature set this definition records.
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
There is no widely accepted definition, but in most cases various
combinations of the following are described: unexplained metabolic
acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalaemia, hepatomegaly, renal failure,
hyperlipidaemia, arrhythmia, Brugada-type electrocardiograph (ECG;
elevated ST-segment and coved T-wave) and rapidly progressive cardiac
failure.
explanation: >-
States that the definition is not settled and lists the wider feature set
seen across reported cases, which is why this is a case definition rather
than validated criteria.
epidemiology:
- name: Incidence in critically ill adults on propofol for more than 24 hours
description: >-
In a prospective multicenter cohort of 1,017 critically ill adults
prescribed propofol, the syndrome developed in 11, slightly exceeding 1%,
under a conservative definition requiring metabolic acidosis plus cardiac
dysfunction plus one of rhabdomyolysis, hypertriglyceridemia or renal
failure. This is the only prospective incidence estimate; every other figure
in this entry comes from pooled case reports, where the denominator is
unknown.
unit: proportion of a prospective ICU cohort
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19874582
reference_title: "Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
CONCLUSIONS: Despite using a conservative definition for PRIS, and only
considering new-onset PRIS clinical manifestations, the incidence of PRIS
slightly exceeds 1%.
explanation: >-
The prospective incidence estimate, with the authors' own note that their
definition was conservative.
- reference: PMID:19874582
reference_title: "Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
While propofol is associated with an infusion syndrome (PRIS) that may
cause death, the incidence of PRIS is unknown.
explanation: >-
States why a prospective denominator was needed: before this study the
incidence rested on voluntarily reported cases.
- name: Cases in the published literature to 2019
description: >-
A structured literature review identified 168 cases across 108
publications, analysing children and adults separately because propofol is
no longer used for long-term sedation in children.
unit: cases reported in the literature
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30857601
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: We reviewed 108 publications documenting 168 cases of propofol infusion syndrome.
explanation: Gives the size of the reported case literature.
pathophysiology:
- name: Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Inhibition by Propofol
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
description: >-
Propofol inhibits electron transport, with complex I more sensitive than
complex II, and additionally permits a proton leak across the inner
mitochondrial membrane. The result is reduced oxidative phosphorylation
capacity with a dissipated proton-motive force.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: mitochondrial electron transport, NADH to ubiquinone
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0006120
label: mitochondrial electron transport, NADH to ubiquinone
- preferred_term: proton leak across the inner mitochondrial membrane
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:1902600
label: proton transmembrane transport
downstream:
- target: Cellular Bioenergetic Failure
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: Loss of oxidative ATP production starves tissues of high oxidative demand.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Complex I in isolated rat liver mitochondria is more sensitive to
inhibition by propofol than complex II
explanation: >-
Locates the respiratory-chain lesion at complex I in isolated
mitochondria, which is the experimental basis for this node.
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
It is proposed that the syndrome may be caused by either a direct
mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibition or impaired mitochondrial fatty
acid metabolism mediated by propofol.
explanation: >-
States respiratory-chain inhibition as one of the two proposed mechanisms.
Note the hedging verb: this is a proposal, not an established mechanism.
- name: Impaired Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Oxidation
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
description: >-
Propofol also produces a defect of fatty acid oxidation, evidenced in
children with PRIS by accumulation of acylcarnitine species that normalised
once the infusion stopped. Free fatty acids rise at the same time, because
critical illness shifts the energy source toward lipolysis and the lipid
vehicle of propofol adds further substrate.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: fatty acid beta-oxidation
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0006635
label: fatty acid beta-oxidation
downstream:
- target: Cellular Bioenergetic Failure
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Blocking the alternative oxidative fuel compounds the energy deficit,
particularly where carbohydrate intake is inadequate.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
increased plasma concentrations of acyl derivatives of carnitine in
children with PRIS, which normalised after cessation of propofol infusion,
suggesting a propofol-induced defect of fatty acid oxidation
explanation: >-
The human biochemical observation behind the fatty-acid-oxidation arm, and
its reversibility on withdrawal.
- name: Cellular Bioenergetic Failure
biological_scale: CELLULAR
description: >-
With both oxidative routes impaired, cells with high and sustained energy
demand, cardiac myocytes and skeletal muscle in particular, fail to meet
their ATP requirement and shift to anaerobic metabolism.
downstream:
- target: Myocyte Injury and Necrosis
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Cardiac Conduction Instability
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Lactic acidosis
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: Anaerobic metabolism raises lactate, producing the unexplained acidosis.
- target: Metabolic acidosis
causal_link_type: DIRECT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
It is proposed that the syndrome may be caused by either a direct
mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibition or impaired mitochondrial fatty
acid metabolism mediated by propofol.
explanation: >-
Both proposed mechanisms converge on failure of mitochondrial energy
production, which is what this node represents.
- name: Myocyte Injury and Necrosis
biological_scale: TISSUE
description: >-
Energy failure in striated muscle produces rhabdomyolysis with release of
creatine kinase, myoglobin and intracellular potassium. In the reported
series this feature accumulates with duration of exposure rather than with
dose.
downstream:
- target: Rhabdomyolysis
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Hyperkalemia
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: Potassium released from necrotic myocytes raises serum potassium.
- target: Acute kidney injury
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: Myoglobin released by muscle necrosis injures the kidney.
- target: Discolouration of urine
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Myoglobin in the urine discolours it, which is how the muscle injury
presents at the bedside.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36407194
reference_title: "Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Also, the long-chain acyl-carnitine esters too require CPT-1 for transport
and henceforth are unable to traverse into the muscular tissue cells, which
leads to muscle necrosis and associated rhabdomyolysis of PRIS
explanation: >-
States the mechanistic step this node asserts: the fatty-acid-transport
defect starves muscle and produces necrosis with rhabdomyolysis.
- reference: PMID:36407194
reference_title: "Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
The cardiovascular system suffers from depleted ATP stores and high FFAs,
which directly attack cardiomyocytic functions
explanation: >-
Extends the same energy-failure mechanism to cardiac myocytes, which is why
this node feeds both the rhabdomyolysis and the cardiac branches.
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Cardiac failure and metabolic acidosis occur early in a dose-dependent
manner, while arrhythmia, other electrocardiographic changes and
rhabdomyolysis appear more frequently after prolonged propofol infusions,
irrespective of dose.
explanation: >-
Separates the dose-dependent from the duration-dependent features, and
places rhabdomyolysis in the latter group.
- name: Cardiac Conduction Instability
biological_scale: TISSUE
description: >-
Bioenergetic failure in the myocardium destabilises conduction. The earliest
electrocardiographic sign reported is right bundle branch block with coved
ST elevation in the right precordial leads, the pattern that makes the
tracing indistinguishable from the Brugada type 1 pattern. Refractory
bradycardia and progression toward asystole follow.
downstream:
- target: Coved ST-segment elevation in right precordial leads
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Complete right bundle branch block
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Arrhythmia
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Reported arrhythmias are not confined to bradycardia; the case literature
counts arrhythmia in general as one of the commonest features.
- target: Bradycardia
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Hypotension
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Cardiogenic shock
causal_link_type: DIRECT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
An early sign of cardiac instability associated with the syndrome is the
development of right bundle branch block with convex-curved ('coved type')
ST elevation in the right praecordial leads (V1 to V3) of the
electrocardiogram.
explanation: >-
Names the electrocardiographic signature and its position as an early
marker of cardiac instability.
phenotypes:
- name: Lactic acidosis
category: Laboratory
description: Unexplained lactic acidosis, one of the cardinal features of the syndrome.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Lactic acidosis
term:
id: HP:0003128
label: Lactic acidosis
evidence:
- reference: PMID:20544610
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome and Brugada syndrome electrocardiographic phenocopy.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
This anesthetic drug may cause a rare condition named propofol infusion
syndrome, characterized by unexplained lactic acidosis, lipemia,
rhabdomyolysis, cardiovascular collapse and Brugada-like
electrocardiographic pattern or Brugada electrocardiographic phenocopy
changes following high-dose propofol infusion over prolonged periods of
time.
explanation: >-
The paper that introduced the phenocopy term, listing lactic acidosis
first among the syndrome's features.
- name: Metabolic acidosis
category: Laboratory
description: >-
Metabolic acidosis with a base deficit above 10 mmol/L is part of the
classic case definition, and occurs early and in proportion to dose.
frequency: 77% of reported cases
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Metabolic acidosis
term:
id: HP:0001942
label: Metabolic acidosis
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Metabolic acidosis remained the most common symptom of PRIS with a constant
incidence at around 77 % in reported cases.
explanation: Source for the frequency, and for this being the commonest feature.
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
The clinical features of propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) are acute
refractory bradycardia leading to asystole, in the presence of one or more
of the following: metabolic acidosis (base deficit > 10 mmol.l(-1)),
rhabdomyolysis, hyperlipidaemia, and enlarged or fatty liver.
explanation: Places metabolic acidosis in the case definition with its threshold.
- name: Rhabdomyolysis
category: Laboratory
description: >-
Skeletal muscle breakdown, more frequent in adults than children, appearing
after prolonged infusion irrespective of dose.
frequency: 56% of reported cases
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Rhabdomyolysis
term:
id: HP:0003201
label: Rhabdomyolysis
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30857601
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Lipidaemia, fever, and hepatomegaly occurred more frequently in children
than in adults, whilst rhabdomyolysis and hyperkalaemia were more frequent
in adults.
explanation: >-
Reports the age split in feature frequency, with rhabdomyolysis commoner
in adults.
- name: Hyperkalemia
category: Laboratory
description: >-
Raised serum potassium, in part from potassium released by necrotic
myocytes, and independently associated with mortality in adults.
frequency: 24% of reported cases
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Hyperkalemia
term:
id: HP:0002153
label: Hyperkalemia
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30857601
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Mortality from propofol infusion syndrome is independently associated with
fever and hepatomegaly in children, and electrocardiogram changes,
hypotension, hyperkalaemia, traumatic brain injury, and a mean propofol
infusion rate >5 mg kg-1 h-1 in adults.
explanation: >-
Identifies hyperkalemia among the features independently associated with
death in adults.
- name: Hypertriglyceridemia
category: Laboratory
description: >-
Hyperlipidemia, reported as lipaemia or raised plasma triglycerides, and
more frequent in children than adults.
frequency: 24% of reported cases, and absent in most
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Hypertriglyceridemia
term:
id: HP:0002155
label: Hypertriglyceridemia
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
CONCLUSION: PRIS can develop with propofol infusion <4 mg/kg per hour and
its diagnosis may be challenging as some of its typical features
(hypertriglyceridaemia, fever, hepatomegaly, heart failure) are often (>95
%) missing and others (arrhythmia, electrocardiographic changes) occur
late.
explanation: >-
Names hypertriglyceridaemia directly, matching the bound term, and records
the review's own caution that this feature is usually absent, so it must
not be treated as required for the diagnosis.
- reference: PMID:30857601
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Lipidaemia, fever, and hepatomegaly occurred more frequently in children
than in adults, whilst rhabdomyolysis and hyperkalaemia were more frequent
in adults.
explanation: Reports lipidaemia as commoner in children.
- name: Elevated hepatic transaminases
category: Laboratory
frequency: 13% of reported cases, tabulated as abnormal liver function test
description: >-
Abnormal liver function tests, reported in 13% of pooled cases. Bound to the
transaminase term because that is the abnormality the clinical review names;
the review that tabulates the frequency uses the broader phrase "abnormal
liver function test", so the frequency is recorded with that wording.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Elevated liver enzymes
term:
id: HP:0002910
label: Elevated circulating hepatic transaminase concentration
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: "| Abnormal liver function test | 20 (13 %)"
explanation: The tabulated frequency across 153 pooled cases.
- reference: PMID:36407194
reference_title: "Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
The patient should be closely monitored for the development of signs and
symptoms of PRIS which include metabolic acidosis with lactic acidosis,
severe bradycardia, ventricular arrhythmia, asystole, cardiogenic shock,
rhabdomyolysis, hepatomegaly, acute kidney injury, renal failure,
hypertriglyceridemia, hyperkalaemia, hyperlipidaemia, elevated liver
enzymes, increased serum creatinine kinase, serum lipase, amylase, lactate,
myoglobinuria and Brugada-like ST elevation in ECG to name the important
ones.
explanation: >-
Names elevated liver enzymes among the features to monitor for, which is
the abnormality the bound term describes.
- name: Discolouration of urine
category: Clinical
frequency: 11% of reported cases
description: >-
Discoloured urine, reflecting myoglobin released by muscle necrosis. Bound to
the urinary-colour term rather than to myoglobinuria, because the 11% figure
counts the observed discolouration rather than a confirmed myoglobin
measurement.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Discolouration of urine
term:
id: HP:0012086
label: Abnormal urinary color
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: "| Discolouration of urine | 16 (11 %)"
explanation: The tabulated frequency across 153 pooled cases.
- reference: PMID:36407194
reference_title: "Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
These are typical signs of rhabdomyolysis, leading to renal failure and
myoglobinuria.
explanation: >-
Supports the mechanism behind the discolouration, myoglobin released by
muscle breakdown, which is why this phenotype is wired from the myocyte
necrosis node.
- name: Hepatomegaly
category: Clinical
description: >-
Enlarged or fatty liver, part of the classic case definition, and in
children independently associated with mortality.
frequency: 11% of reported cases
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Hepatomegaly
term:
id: HP:0002240
label: Hepatomegaly
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30857601
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Mortality from propofol infusion syndrome is independently associated with
fever and hepatomegaly in children, and electrocardiogram changes,
hypotension, hyperkalaemia, traumatic brain injury, and a mean propofol
infusion rate >5 mg kg-1 h-1 in adults.
explanation: >-
Identifies hepatomegaly among the features independently associated with
death in children.
- name: Fever
category: Clinical
description: >-
Unexplained fever, more frequent in children, and independently associated
with mortality both in children and in the earlier case series.
frequency: 19% of reported cases
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Fever
term:
id: HP:0001945
label: Fever
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
We found that propofol infusion rate and duration, the presence of
traumatic brain injury and fever are factors independently associated with
mortality in reported cases of PRIS
explanation: >-
Places fever among the factors independently associated with death in the
153-case series.
- name: Acute kidney injury
category: Laboratory
description: Renal failure, reported as oliguria or rising creatinine.
frequency: 39% of reported cases
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Acute kidney injury
term:
id: HP:0001919
label: Acute kidney injury
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
There is no widely accepted definition, but in most cases various
combinations of the following are described: unexplained metabolic
acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalaemia, hepatomegaly, renal failure,
hyperlipidaemia, arrhythmia, Brugada-type electrocardiograph (ECG;
elevated ST-segment and coved T-wave) and rapidly progressive cardiac
failure.
explanation: Lists renal failure among the reported features.
- name: Arrhythmia
category: Clinical
frequency: 66% of reported cases
description: >-
Arrhythmia in general, not only bradycardia, is among the commonest reported
features, and appears late relative to the metabolic changes. Bound to the
general arrhythmia term because the case literature counts arrhythmias
together rather than by rhythm.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Arrhythmia
term:
id: HP:0011675
label: Arrhythmia
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: "| Arrhythmia | 101 (66 %)"
explanation: >-
The review's own tabulation of how often arrhythmia was reported across 153
cases.
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Cardiac failure and metabolic acidosis occur early in a dose-dependent
manner, while arrhythmia, other electrocardiographic changes and
rhabdomyolysis appear more frequently after prolonged propofol infusions,
irrespective of dose.
explanation: >-
Places arrhythmia among the duration-dependent rather than dose-dependent
features.
- name: Hypotension
category: Clinical
frequency: 30% of reported cases
description: >-
Hypotension, independently associated with death in adults in the structured
review of 168 cases.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Hypotension
term:
id: HP:0002615
label: Hypotension
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: "| Hypotension | 45 (30 %)"
explanation: The review's tabulated frequency of hypotension across 153 cases.
- reference: PMID:30857601
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Mortality from propofol infusion syndrome is independently associated with
fever and hepatomegaly in children, and electrocardiogram changes,
hypotension, hyperkalaemia, traumatic brain injury, and a mean propofol
infusion rate >5 mg kg-1 h-1 in adults.
explanation: >-
Identifies hypotension among the features independently associated with
death in adults.
- name: Bradycardia
category: Clinical
description: >-
Acute refractory bradycardia progressing toward asystole, the defining
cardiac presentation. No HPO term for asystole in this sense was found
(`ols:hp`, `search l^Asystole` returns only Reflex asystolic syncope), so
the bradycardia term carries the phenotype and the progression is described
here.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Acute refractory bradycardia
term:
id: HP:0001662
label: Bradycardia
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
The clinical features of propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) are acute
refractory bradycardia leading to asystole, in the presence of one or more
of the following: metabolic acidosis (base deficit > 10 mmol.l(-1)),
rhabdomyolysis, hyperlipidaemia, and enlarged or fatty liver.
explanation: >-
Names refractory bradycardia leading to asystole as the defining cardiac
feature.
- name: Cardiogenic shock
category: Clinical
description: Rapidly progressive cardiac failure and cardiovascular collapse.
frequency: 23% of reported cases
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Cardiogenic shock
term:
id: HP:0030149
label: Cardiogenic shock
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26558513
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
Cardiac failure and metabolic acidosis occur early in a dose-dependent
manner, while arrhythmia, other electrocardiographic changes and
rhabdomyolysis appear more frequently after prolonged propofol infusions,
irrespective of dose.
explanation: >-
Reports cardiac failure as an early, dose-dependent feature of the
syndrome.
- name: Coved ST-segment elevation in right precordial leads
category: Laboratory
description: >-
Coved ST elevation in leads V1 to V3, the pattern shared with the Brugada
type 1 electrocardiogram and the reason this syndrome is the setting in
which the term Brugada phenocopy was introduced.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Coved ST-segment elevation in leads V1 to V3
term:
id: HP:6000984
label: Coved type ST segment elevation
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
An early sign of cardiac instability associated with the syndrome is the
development of right bundle branch block with convex-curved ('coved type')
ST elevation in the right praecordial leads (V1 to V3) of the
electrocardiogram.
explanation: Describes the coved ST elevation and its precordial distribution.
- name: Complete right bundle branch block
category: Laboratory
description: >-
Right bundle branch block accompanying the coved ST elevation as an early
sign of cardiac instability.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Right bundle branch block
term:
id: HP:0011712
label: Complete right bundle branch block
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
An early sign of cardiac instability associated with the syndrome is the
development of right bundle branch block with convex-curved ('coved type')
ST elevation in the right praecordial leads (V1 to V3) of the
electrocardiogram.
explanation: Names right bundle branch block as part of the early ECG picture.
treatments:
- name: Immediate Discontinuation of Propofol
description: >-
Recognising the syndrome and stopping the infusion, substituting an
alternative sedative, is the first step in management. The reversibility of
the acylcarnitine abnormality on withdrawal is part of the evidence that
the drug is the cause.
therapeutic_modality: OTHER
treatment_term:
preferred_term: discontinuation of the causative drug
term:
id: NCIT:C128535
label: Pharmacotherapy Discontinuation
target_mechanisms:
- target: Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Inhibition by Propofol
description: Removing the inhibitor is the only measure that addresses the cause.
- target: Impaired Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Oxidation
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36407194
reference_title: "Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
The first step in managing PRIS is to immediately recognise and
discontinue propofol infusion and replace it with other sedating agents
like alfentanil, midazolam, etc.
explanation: States discontinuation as the first management step.
- name: Continuous Haemofiltration
description: >-
Extracorporeal clearance, recommended early in management by the structured
review of 168 cases.
therapeutic_modality: OTHER
treatment_term:
preferred_term: continuous haemofiltration
term:
id: NCIT:C172594
label: Hemofiltration
target_mechanisms:
- target: Metabolic acidosis
description: Correcting the acidosis and clearing accumulated metabolites.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30857601
reference_title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
We recommend early consideration of continuous haemofiltration in the
management of propofol infusion syndrome.
explanation: The review's explicit management recommendation.
- name: Haemodialysis with Cardiorespiratory Support
description: >-
Dialysis or haemoperfusion combined with cardiorespiratory support has been
the most successful reported treatment, in a syndrome where options are
otherwise limited.
therapeutic_modality: OTHER
treatment_term:
preferred_term: haemodialysis with cardiorespiratory support
term:
id: NCIT:C15248
label: Hemodialysis
target_mechanisms:
- target: Metabolic acidosis
- target: Cardiogenic shock
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Haemodialysis or haemoperfusion with cardiorespiratory support has been
the most successful treatment.
explanation: Identifies the treatment combination with the best reported outcome.
- name: Sodium Bicarbonate for Acidosis
description: Buffering of metabolic and lactic acidosis as supportive management.
therapeutic_modality: SMALL_MOLECULE
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Pharmacotherapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15986
label: Pharmacotherapy
therapeutic_agent:
- preferred_term: sodium bicarbonate
term:
id: CHEBI:32139
label: sodium hydrogencarbonate
target_mechanisms:
- target: Metabolic acidosis
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36407194
reference_title: "Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Metabolic and lactic acidosis can be managed by the administration of
sodium bicarbonate, haemodialysis, and hemofiltration.
explanation: Names bicarbonate among the measures for the acidosis.
differential_diagnoses:
- name: Brugada syndrome
description: >-
The electrocardiogram in propofol infusion syndrome can show coved ST
elevation in the right precordial leads, which is the Brugada type 1
pattern, so the tracing alone does not separate the two. What separates them
is the clinical setting, the accompanying metabolic and muscle findings, and
resolution once the infusion stops. Whether the pattern here should be
called a Brugada phenocopy is contested, and the dispute matters because
this syndrome is where the term was coined; see notes.
phenotypes:
- name: Coved type ST segment elevation
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Coved type ST segment elevation
term:
id: HP:6000984
label: Coved type ST segment elevation
distinguishing_features:
- A high-dose, prolonged propofol infusion is running when the pattern appears
- Accompanying metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalemia or hepatomegaly,
which congenital Brugada syndrome does not produce
- Resolution of the pattern after the infusion is stopped
- Right bundle branch block accompanying the coved ST elevation as an early sign
evidence:
- reference: PMID:20544610
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome and Brugada syndrome electrocardiographic phenocopy.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
This anesthetic drug may cause a rare condition named propofol infusion
syndrome, characterized by unexplained lactic acidosis, lipemia,
rhabdomyolysis, cardiovascular collapse and Brugada-like
electrocardiographic pattern or Brugada electrocardiographic phenocopy
changes following high-dose propofol infusion over prolonged periods of
time.
explanation: >-
The paper that introduced the phenocopy term, describing the shared ECG
appearance alongside the metabolic and muscle features that distinguish
the syndrome.
- reference: PMID:23094876
reference_title: "Brugada phenocopy: new terminology and proposed classification."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
to describe an acquired Brugada-like ECG pattern in the setting of
propofol infusion syndrome.
explanation: >-
Records that the phenocopy terminology was introduced for this syndrome
specifically.
- reference: PMID:23094876
reference_title: "Brugada phenocopy: new terminology and proposed classification."
supports: REFUTE
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Consequently, the Group 1 drugs for the most part cannot be considered
Brugada phenocopies.
explanation: >-
The same classification paper places propofol among its Group 1 agents,
which it says act by sodium channel blockade and mostly cannot be
considered phenocopies. So the paper that adopted the term for this
syndrome also excludes its drug from the category.
notes: >-
Whether the electrocardiographic change in this syndrome is a Brugada
phenocopy is unsettled, and the tension sits inside a single paper.
PMID:23094876 credits Riera and colleagues with introducing the term for
propofol infusion syndrome, and in the same text lists propofol among its
Group 1 agents, states that nearly all of those act via sodium channel
blockade, and concludes that Group 1 drugs for the most part cannot be
considered Brugada phenocopies. The entry records both statements rather
than choosing between them. Brugada_Syndrome carries the reciprocal
differential. No sodium-channel mechanism is asserted for propofol in this
entry's pathophysiology, because the reviews cited here attribute the
syndrome to mitochondrial impairment and do not establish a channel-blocking
mechanism for the ECG change.
discussions:
- discussion_id: q_pris_genetic_susceptibility
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
prompt: >-
Does an inherited susceptibility determine which patients receiving
high-dose prolonged propofol develop propofol infusion syndrome?
rationale: >-
The syndrome is rare relative to how widely propofol is used for
intensive-care sedation, which implies host susceptibility rather than dose
alone. Subclinical mitochondrial disease is listed among the predisposing
factors, and a fatty-acid-oxidation defect is one of the two proposed
mechanisms, so an inherited partial defect in either pathway is a plausible
determinant. The question has been open since the syndrome was named and no
cited source here resolves it.
attaches_to:
- pathophysiology#Impaired Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Oxidation
- pathophysiology#Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Inhibition by Propofol
evidence:
- reference: PMID:20544610
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome and Brugada syndrome electrocardiographic phenocopy.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: Uncertainty remains as to whether a genetic susceptibility exists.
explanation: States the open question directly.
- reference: PMID:17567345
reference_title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: REVIEW_SYNTHESIS
snippet: >-
Predisposing factors include young age, severe critical illness of central
nervous system or respiratory origin, exogenous catecholamine or
glucocorticoid administration, inadequate carbohydrate intake and
subclinical mitochondrial disease.
explanation: >-
Names subclinical mitochondrial disease among the predisposing factors,
which is the specific form an inherited susceptibility would most likely
take.
references:
- reference: PMID:20544610
title: Propofol infusion syndrome and Brugada syndrome electrocardiographic phenocopy.
- reference: PMID:17567345
title: Propofol infusion syndrome.
- reference: PMID:26558513
title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured review of experimental studies and 153 published case reports."
- reference: PMID:30857601
title: "Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports."
- reference: PMID:36407194
title: "Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review."
- reference: PMID:19874582
title: "Incidence of propofol-related infusion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective, multicenter study."
- reference: PMID:23094876
title: "Brugada phenocopy: new terminology and proposed classification."
review_notes: >-
Curated directly rather than by the autonomous agent, because the mention
allowlist in .github/ai-controllers.json does not include the requesting user,
so the summon on issue #13101 was gated out. Diagnostic criteria are recorded
as a CASE_DEFINITION rather than DIAGNOSTIC_CRITERIA because the cited
structured review states no widely accepted definition exists. No
environmental[] block or influences_mechanisms links were added, pending the
modelling decision on issue #10395.
Deep research results are used as seeds for research; they do not undergo the same validation as the main records and may contain errors. How we use deep research.
Create: Propofol Infusion Syndrome · 2026-09-29T03:43:19Z · View source
Created the entry from issue #13101, which proposed it because propofol infusion syndrome is the clinical setting the term Brugada phenocopy was coined for and dismech had no record of it. No disease_term. MONDO has no term for the syndrome: ols:mondo returns nothing for `search l~propofol` or for free-text "propofol" and "propofol infusion syndrome", against a positive control on `l~Brugada` that returns the expected terms. NCIT holds only the drug, NCIT:C29384. No cached Orphanet leaf record mentions propofol. The searches and the positive control are recorded in the entry's own notes so the negative-existence claim is checkable. The MONDO parent-term question the issue raised is left open; it blocks a term request, not the entry, and 38 of 3,230 entries on main carry no disease_term. No conforms_to. Both candidate modules were read before deciding, as the issue asked. mitochondrial_dysfunction scopes itself to the hallmark of aging and its chain starts at mtDNA mutation and passes through impaired mitophagy, which an acute pharmacological inhibition does not have. metabolic_intoxication_decompensation scopes itself to inborn errors with a deficient enzyme or transporter, where this is reversible drug inhibition of a normal pathway. Recorded in notes rather than conforming to a module whose own description excludes the case. Pathophysiology follows the two proposed mechanisms as separate molecular nodes, respiratory-chain inhibition and impaired fatty acid oxidation, both feeding one bioenergetic-failure node that fans out to myocyte necrosis and cardiac conduction instability. The hedging in the source is preserved: the reviews say the syndrome "may be caused by" these mechanisms, and the evidence explanations say so rather than asserting an established mechanism. The Brugada relationship is a differential diagnosis carrying both sides of the dispute rather than a phenocopy claim. PMID:23094876 credits Riera with introducing the term for this syndrome and, in the same text, lists propofol among its Group 1 agents, says nearly all act by sodium channel blockade, and concludes Group 1 drugs mostly cannot be considered phenocopies. Those two statements are recorded as a SUPPORT and a REFUTE item against the same paper, which is what the evidence model asks for when one source cuts both ways. No sodium-channel mechanism is asserted in the pathophysiology, because the reviews cited attribute the syndrome to mitochondrial impairment and do not establish a channel-blocking route to the ECG change. Brugada_Syndrome already carries the reciprocal differential from #12929. The open question about inherited susceptibility is a KNOWLEDGE_GAP discussion attached to both molecular nodes, evidenced by the 2010 paper's own statement that uncertainty remains and by the review that lists subclinical mitochondrial disease among predisposing factors. Curated by hand rather than by the autonomous agent. The summon on #13101 fired the mention workflow, whose gate logged `User: gingin77, Allowed: false, Has mention: true` and skipped the job that would have done the work; the allowlist is .github/ai-controllers.json on the default branch. The issue comment was updated to record that, and no self-authorizing change to that file was made. Six references fetched and cited: PMID:20544610, PMID:17567345, PMID:26558513, PMID:30857601, PMID:36407194, plus the already-cached PMID:23094876. One snippet had to be reselected: a sentence carrying bracketed citation markers failed exact-quote validation, and a bracket-free sentence from the same review was used instead. Review round 1. The reviewer found two features present in more than 10% of reported cases that the entry missed, from a frequency table in a paper it already cited: arrhythmia at 66%, modelled only as bradycardia, and hypotension at 30%, absent entirely. Both are now phenotypes wired from the conduction-instability node, and nine phenotypes carry frequency values quoted from that table. Hypertriglyceridemia previously cited a sentence saying "Lipidaemia" while binding the narrower triglyceride term; it now cites a sentence naming hypertriglyceridaemia directly, which also records the review's caution that the feature is missing in most cases. The discontinuation treatment moved from NCIT:C49236 Therapeutic Procedure to NCIT:C128535 Pharmacotherapy Discontinuation, verified by lookup rather than taken from the review, and already used by Eosinophilia-Myalgia_Syndrome. The Myocyte Injury node cited only a sentence about when rhabdomyolysis appears, which did not support the node's own claim; it now carries two mechanistic sentences from PMID:36407194. The review also asked for the deep-research artifact the policy requires for a new entry, and was right that a hand pass can miss what a run catches. The run produced research/Propofol_Infusion_Syndrome-deep-research-claude_code.md (falcon requested, fell back to claude_code; 25/25 references verified, 0 confabulation) and surfaced two things the entry lacked. A prospective multicenter cohort of 1,017 ICU adults gives the only real incidence figure, slightly above 1% (PMID:19874582), which is now an epidemiology record alongside the pooled case count and says explicitly that every other figure here has an unknown denominator. And MeSH does code the syndrome as the supplementary concept D000072736, which matters for the MONDO request; there is no MeSH mapping slot, so it is recorded in notes. That identifier was verified against the NCBI MeSH database before use, and the first lookup attempt failed because a supplementary concept is retrieved by its own UID rather than the 68-prefixed descriptor form. Two term defects inside the report were left alone rather than propagated, which is what a report being a lead means: its own validation flags GO:0055114 as obsolete, and CL:1001603 as labelled 'kidney proximal tubule epithelial cell' in the report when the ontology says 'lung macrophage'. Neither is bound anywhere in this entry. The report also cites issue #13101 as a source for MONDO having no term, so its agreement on that point is not independent of the claim it was asked about. Review round 2, on the approving review's non-blocking note: the two remaining features above 10% in the same frequency table were added, abnormal liver function tests at 13% and discolouration of urine at 11%, so the entry now covers every feature the table reports above that threshold. Each is bound to a term its own snippet supports rather than to the most precise concept available: elevated transaminases rather than a generic liver-function term, since the clinical review names elevated liver enzymes; and abnormal urinary colour rather than myoglobinuria, since the 11% counts observed discolouration rather than a confirmed myoglobin measurement, with the myoglobin mechanism carried in the description and evidenced separately. The urine phenotype is wired from the myocyte necrosis node. Validation after review round 2: just validate (46/46 snippets, 53 titles, 0 issues), validate-terms, count-verified-snippets, check-duplicate-keys, check-entity-refs, check-causal-targets, check-qualifier-terms, check-granularity, and the batched validate-disorders all pass. Whole-KB gates clean: check-folded-hyphens, check-snippet-length, check-title-snippets, check-snippet-grading, check-reference-titles, check-coarse-phenotypes, check-enum-values, check-case-collisions, check-delivery-system. No baseline file was updated. No environmental[] or influences_mechanisms links, pending #10395.
Propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS, also called propofol-related infusion syndrome) is a rare but frequently fatal drug-toxicity syndrome that develops in patients receiving prolonged, high-dose infusions of propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol), the short-acting intravenous sedative-hypnotic agent used ubiquitously in anesthesia and intensive care sedation. It is characterized by the abrupt onset of severe metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis/myoglobinuria, hyperkalemia, hyperlipidemia, hepatomegaly with fatty liver infiltration, acute kidney injury, and cardiovascular collapse — classically progressing to refractory bradyarrhythmia and asystole (MeSH D000072736; Wikipedia summary).
The syndrome was first described by Bray in 1998 in a case series of critically ill children (Bray RJ, "Propofol infusion syndrome in children," Paediatr Anaesth 1998), in whom 12 of 15 reported children died after prolonged high-dose propofol sedation with the constellation of refractory bradycardia, lipemic plasma, hepatomegaly, metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and myoglobinuria. Although first recognized in the pediatric ICU population, PRIS is now well documented in adults, particularly in neurocritical care (traumatic brain injury, refractory/super-refractory status epilepticus) (Bray 1998, summarized in PMC8660594; BJA Education review).
A widely used operational definition (Bray-derived) is: acute refractory bradycardia progressing to asystole, occurring in the presence of at least one of: metabolic acidosis (base deficit >10 mmol/L), rhabdomyolysis/myoglobinuria, lipemic plasma or fatty liver enlargement — typically associated with propofol infusion rates >4 mg/kg/h for >48 hours, though cases have been reported outside these thresholds.
| Resource | Identifier / Status |
|---|---|
| MeSH | D000072736 — "Propofol Infusion Syndrome" |
| MONDO | No MONDO term currently exists. A dismech GitHub issue (#13101, "Curate propofol infusion syndrome, which has no MONDO term") documents this gap explicitly — the condition fits MONDO's usual disease-entity criteria (known etiology, named phenotype constellation, dose/time-course relationship, resolution on drug withdrawal) but has not yet been minted. |
| OMIM | No OMIM entry — PRIS is an acquired, drug-induced toxidrome rather than a Mendelian disease, though it can unmask an underlying Mendelian mitochondrial disorder (see Etiology, below). |
| Orphanet | No dedicated Orphanet entry identified in this search. |
| ICD-10/11 | No dedicated code identified; typically coded under adverse-effect/poisoning codes (e.g., T41 anesthetic poisoning) combined with the resulting organ dysfunction codes rather than a single disease code. |
| Synonyms | Propofol-related infusion syndrome; PRIS; "propofol infusion 'syndrome'" (the scare quotes in some literature reflecting debate over whether it is a single unified syndrome or a spectrum of overlapping mitochondrial toxicities) |
Nearly all available data derive from aggregated case reports/case series and observational cohort studies rather than large prospective trials, given the rarity and unpredictability of onset; the largest prospective multicenter incidence study enrolled 1,017 adult ICU patients (Roberts RJ et al., Crit Care 2009; PMC2784401), and the largest structured literature synthesis pooled 153 published case reports from 1990–2014 (Krajčová A et al., Crit Care 2015, PMID: 26558513).
PRIS is fundamentally an environmental/iatrogenic drug-toxicity syndrome — the sole necessary causal exposure is prolonged, high-dose intravenous propofol infusion. There is no infectious or intrinsically genetic causation, though genetic background strongly modulates susceptibility (see below).
Dose/duration (the dominant modifiable risk factor): - Infusion rate >4 mg/kg/h (some sources cite >5 mg/kg/h) sustained for >48 hours is the classically cited threshold. One case-control analysis found the odds ratio for PRIS increased 1.93-fold for every 1 mg/kg/h increment in mean propofol dose above 4 mg/kg/h. - However, PRIS is not strictly dose- or duration-dependent: cases have been documented after as little as 3–5 hours of high-dose infusion, and at doses as low as 1.4 mg/kg/h (BJA Education review; Drug Safety/Deranged Physiology summaries).
Patient/clinical risk factors: - Critical illness/severe systemic inflammatory state (sepsis) - Severe traumatic brain injury and other acute neurological injury — risk approximately doubles at infusion rates >5 mg/kg/h in this population - Refractory or super-refractory status epilepticus requiring prolonged high-dose propofol - Carbohydrate depletion / low carbohydrate-to-lipid caloric ratio (inadequate glucose delivery forces reliance on fatty-acid oxidation, which propofol itself impairs) - Concomitant high-dose exogenous catecholamines (vasopressors) and/or glucocorticoids — these are hypothesized "priming" factors that potentiate skeletal/cardiac muscle protein catabolism and mitochondrial stress - Young age (children/adolescents historically over-represented, though risk is now well established in adults) - Male sex has been associated with higher mortality risk in some cohorts
Genetic risk factors: - Underlying primary mitochondrial disease or fatty-acid β-oxidation disorders are the clearest genetic susceptibility factor. Multiple case reports describe propofol "unmasking" previously unrecognized mitochondrial disease: - A MELAS (mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes) patient carrying the m.3271T>C variant in MT-TL1 developed severe PRIS-pattern lactic acidosis and rhabdomyolysis (Shimizu et al., Acute Med Surg 2020, 10.1002/ams2.473). - A case report described PRIS heralding an undiagnosed mitochondrial disease (Neurology 2014, PMID: 24491974). - A case discusses a POLG mitochondrial DNA polymerase mutation in the context of PRIS management (e-jnc.org case report). - Review literature states explicitly: "Mitochondrial disorders are prone to propofol infusion syndrome" (PMC7774597) and "predisposition to mitochondrial dysfunction caused by genetic mutations promotes cell death and caspase activation induced by propofol" (Finsterer & Frank, J Child Neurol 2016). - Pre-existing inborn errors of fatty-acid β-oxidation (e.g., carnitine-acylcarnitine translocase deficiency, carnitine palmitoyltransferase deficiencies) are a recognized contraindication/relative contraindication to propofol infusion, since propofol itself inhibits the same pathway these patients already have impaired (narrative review, Medicine 2022).
No genetic or pharmacological protective factors are established. The principal "protective" strategy is behavioral/procedural: adherence to dose/duration limits, adequate carbohydrate provision, use of alternative or adjunctive sedatives (dexmedetomidine, benzodiazepines, barbiturates) to permit propofol-sparing regimens, and vigilant biochemical monitoring (see Prevention, §13).
The core gene-environment interaction is between constitutional mitochondrial/fatty-acid-oxidation reserve capacity (genetic) and exogenous mitochondrial toxin exposure plus metabolic stress from critical illness (environmental): a patient with normal but limited FAO/ETC reserve who is additionally stressed by sepsis, catecholamine excess, and carbohydrate starvation can be tipped into overt PRIS by an inhibitory drug load that would be tolerated in a metabolically unstressed individual — and a patient with a subclinical primary mitochondrial disorder can decompensate catastrophically at doses/durations that are otherwise considered "safe."
| Phenotype | Type | Frequency in pooled case data | Suggested HPO term |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refractory sinus bradycardia progressing to asystole/cardiac arrest | Clinical sign (cardiac) | Defining/near-universal in classic PRIS | HP:0001688 (Sinus bradycardia); HP:0004943 (Asystole is not a direct HPO term — consider HP:0001677 Coronary artery atherosclerosis is wrong; use HP:0011675 Arrhythmia as broader term) |
| Metabolic (lactic) acidosis | Laboratory abnormality | ~62% in one 21-patient RSE cohort; near-universal across pooled reviews | HP:0001942 (Metabolic acidosis) / HP:0002151 (Hyperlactic acidemia) |
| Rhabdomyolysis / myoglobinuria | Laboratory abnormality / clinical sign | ~42% (RSE cohort); a hallmark finding | HP:0003201 (Rhabdomyolysis) |
| Hyperkalemia | Laboratory abnormality | More frequent in adults than children | HP:0002153 (Hyperkalemia) |
| Hyperlipidemia / lipemic plasma | Laboratory abnormality | ~33% (RSE cohort); more common in children | HP:0003077 (Hyperlipidemia) / HP:0003146 (Hypertriglyceridemia) |
| Hepatomegaly / fatty liver | Physical/imaging sign | More frequent in children than adults; independently associated with pediatric mortality | HP:0002240 (Hepatomegaly) |
| Acute kidney injury | Laboratory/clinical sign | ~38% (RSE cohort) | HP:0001919 (Acute kidney injury) |
| Brugada-pattern ECG changes (down-sloping ST elevation V1–V3) | Clinical sign (electrophysiological) | Reported subset; strongly predicts imminent sudden death | No precise HPO term for acquired Brugada pattern; consider HP:0011675 (Arrhythmia) with notes |
| Elevated hepatic transaminases | Laboratory abnormality | ~28% (RSE cohort) | HP:0002910 (Elevated hepatic transaminase) |
| Cardiomyopathy / myocardial dysfunction | Clinical/imaging sign | Documented on echocardiography and at autopsy (sustained mitochondrial damage in cardiomyocytes, PMC8905003) | HP:0001638 (Cardiomyopathy) |
| Fever | Clinical sign | More frequent in children; independently associated with pediatric mortality | HP:0001945 (Fever) |
| Elevated creatine kinase | Laboratory abnormality | CK >10,000 U/L typical at diagnosis; CK <5,000 U/L marks a low-risk population | (No dedicated HPO term; typically captured as a biomarker/lab value rather than HPO) |
Age of onset: Not congenital — this is an acquired, drug-exposure-triggered syndrome. Onset is typically 1–6 days after initiation of high-dose propofol (median ~3 days in the Roberts et al. 2009 prospective cohort), though onset as early as 3–5 hours has been reported in some cases.
Severity and progression: Highly variable — from subclinical biochemical derangement (rising CK/triglycerides/lactate, "pre-PRIS") to fulminant multi-organ failure and sudden cardiac death within hours once the Brugada-pattern ECG change appears. Course is typically rapidly progressive once overt, but is potentially reversible with immediate propofol discontinuation and aggressive supportive care if caught early.
Clinical presentation differs by age group (Hemphill S et al., structured literature review, Br J Anaesth 2019 S0007091219300108): - Children: lipemia, fever, and hepatomegaly occur more frequently; fever and hepatomegaly are independently associated with mortality. - Adults: rhabdomyolysis and hyperkalemia are more frequent; ECG changes, hypotension, hyperkalemia, traumatic brain injury, and mean infusion rate >5 mg/kg/h are independently associated with mortality.
Quality of life impact: No formal QoL instrument data exist for PRIS specifically, given its acute, often fatal, ICU-confined course; survivors' quality-of-life burden derives from sequelae of the organ injuries sustained (post-AKI renal impairment, post-rhabdomyolysis compartment syndrome/contracture, hypoxic-ischemic sequelae of cardiac arrest, or unmasked chronic mitochondrial disease).
PRIS itself has no single causal gene — it is not a Mendelian disorder. However, the molecular basis of susceptibility and of the toxic mechanism strongly implicates specific gene products:
Variant classification / population frequency: Not applicable in the standard ACMG/ClinVar sense, since PRIS is not itself a variant-caused disease; the relevant variants (in MT-TL1, POLG, CPT1A/CPT2, SLC25A20) are catalogued under their respective primary mitochondrial/FAO disorder entries in ClinVar/OMIM rather than under PRIS.
Functional consequence summary: The convergent molecular lesion is loss of mitochondrial fatty-acid oxidative capacity plus impaired electron transport chain flux, producing an energetic mismatch — cells (especially cardiac and skeletal myocytes, which are highly oxidative-metabolism-dependent) cannot meet ATP demand through either fat or, ultimately, carbohydrate oxidation, precipitating necrosis.
Epigenetic information: No epigenetic mechanism has been established for PRIS; this is an acute pharmacotoxic/bioenergetic process rather than a chromatin-level disease.
Chromosomal abnormalities: Not applicable.
Propofol itself is the environmental/exposure agent — this is the paradigm case of an iatrogenic drug-toxicity environmental disease:
Fatty-acid β-oxidation pathway (carnitine shuttle: CPT1 → CACT → CPT2); mitochondrial electron transport chain (Complexes I, II/CoQ, III, IV, ATP synthase); intrinsic (mitochondrial) apoptosis pathway (cytochrome c release, caspase-9/-3 activation).
Apoptosis (mitochondrial/intrinsic pathway), necrosis, a Warburg-like metabolic switch from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis, oxidative stress (ROS accumulation).
CPT1 catalytic inhibition (competitive/direct enzymatic inhibition by propofol, not a structural mutation); Complex I and III functional inhibition at the level of electron transfer, with coenzyme Q implicated as an interaction site.
Elevated malonylcarnitine and C5-acylcarnitine (biomarkers of impaired FAO); lactic acidosis; hyperkalemia; hypertriglyceridemia; elevated CK, myoglobin, troponin T.
Organ level (primary): Heart (conduction system and myocardium), skeletal muscle (generalized), liver. Organ level (secondary/complications): Kidneys (myoglobin-mediated acute tubular injury), and — where cardiac arrest occurs — brain (hypoxic-ischemic injury) as a downstream complication rather than a primary target. Body systems involved: Cardiovascular, musculoskeletal (muscle), hepatic, renal, and metabolic/endocrine (lipid and acid-base homeostasis).
Tissue/cell level: - Cardiac muscle tissue → cardiomyocytes (CL:0000746) and the cardiac conduction system (relevant to the Brugada-pattern sodium-channel mechanism). - Skeletal muscle tissue → skeletal myofibers (CL:0000188). - Liver parenchyma → hepatocytes (CL:0000182), with steatotic change. - Renal tubular epithelium → proximal tubule cells, injured secondarily by filtered myoglobin.
Subcellular level: Mitochondria are the central subcellular compartment implicated — specifically the inner mitochondrial membrane (electron transport chain complexes I and III, and the carnitine shuttle machinery at the outer/inner membrane interface). Relevant GO Cellular Component terms: GO:0005743 (mitochondrial inner membrane), GO:0005739 (mitochondrion).
Localization: Systemic/multi-organ rather than lateralized or site-specific; the cardiac lesion is specifically localized to the conduction system and right ventricular outflow tract region electrophysiologically (the anatomic substrate of the Brugada ECG pattern), though no gross structural cardiac abnormality is required (a purely functional/electrophysiological phenotype in most cases).
Onset: Acquired, not congenital; onset is tied entirely to duration/dose of propofol exposure rather than to a developmental stage. Reported latency from infusion initiation to overt syndrome ranges from as little as 3–5 hours (rare, high-dose cases) to a median of ~3 days (range 1–6 days) in the largest prospective adult cohort (Roberts et al. 2009), with classical teaching citing >48 hours of infusion as the higher-risk window.
Onset pattern: Acute to subacute — biochemical derangement (rising CK, triglycerides, lactate — sometimes termed "pre-PRIS") may precede the overt clinical syndrome by hours to a day or more, offering a window for early detection, but once the cardiac phenotype (Brugada-pattern ECG, refractory bradyarrhythmia) manifests, progression to death can occur within hours.
Disease stages: Informally staged as (a) subclinical/biochemical (isolated rise in CK/triglycerides/lactate), (b) overt PRIS (multi-organ derangement without terminal arrhythmia), and (c) fulminant/terminal PRIS (Brugada-pattern ECG, refractory arrhythmia, cardiac arrest) — this is a practical clinical staging derived from the biomarker/ECG literature rather than a formally codified staging system.
Progression rate: Highly variable, but the terminal cardiac phase is characteristically rapid — once ST-segment changes appear, patients have been reported to progress to fatal ventricular fibrillation/electrical storm within hours.
Disease course pattern: Not relapsing-remitting; it is a self-limited toxic exposure syndrome in the sense that removing the causal agent (stopping propofol) halts further toxin delivery, but established organ injury (rhabdomyolysis, AKI, cardiac injury) follows its own resolution timeline, and cardiac arrest, once it occurs, is frequently fatal despite maximal support.
Remission: Resolution of the Brugada-pattern ECG and biochemical derangement has been documented following propofol discontinuation and supportive care in surviving patients (e.g., "Recovery following propofol-associated Brugada electrocardiogram," PMID: 19821933) — remission is treatment(withdrawal)-induced rather than spontaneous while exposure continues.
Critical period for intervention: The subclinical biochemical phase (rising CK, triglycerides, and lactate in a patient on high-dose/prolonged propofol) represents the key window in which discontinuing propofol can prevent progression to the fulminant, often-fatal cardiac phase — this is the rationale behind biomarker-based surveillance protocols (§10, §13).
Inheritance pattern: Not applicable — PRIS is an acquired toxic syndrome, not a heritable disease. (The predisposing primary mitochondrial/FAO disorders that can lower the toxicity threshold follow their own inheritance patterns — autosomal recessive for most FAO disorders such as CPT1/CPT2/CACT deficiency, and maternal/mitochondrial inheritance for mtDNA point mutations such as the MELAS-associated MT-TL1 variant.)
Epidemiology: - Incidence in a prospective multicenter cohort of 1,017 critically ill adults: 1.1%, with onset at a median of 3 days after propofol initiation (Roberts RJ et al. 2009, PMC2784401). - Other cohorts report incidence figures ranging from 2.9% to 4.1% depending on population and case ascertainment strictness. - Among 1,139 patients with suspected PRIS pooled across the literature, 342 (30%) had a fatal outcome; among the 153 published case reports specifically analyzed by Krajčová et al. (2015), 78/153 (51%) were fatal. - Reported case-fatality rates vary widely by cohort (33%, 36.8%, and up to 48% in some series), reflecting differences in case definition, ascertainment bias toward more severe reported cases, and era of treatment (earlier reports predate widespread biomarker surveillance and ECMO/CRRT rescue availability).
Population demographics: - No strong evidence for ethnic or geographic predilection specific to PRIS itself — risk tracks with propofol utilization patterns (ICU sedation practice) rather than population genetics, except insofar as populations with higher carrier frequency of primary mitochondrial/FAO disorders would be expected to have elevated background susceptibility. - Age distribution: originally described in children (the Bray 1998 index series), now well documented across the age spectrum in adults, with particular concentration in neurocritical care populations (TBI, refractory status epilepticus). - Sex ratio: male sex has been associated with increased mortality risk in pooled case analyses, though this may partly reflect underlying case-mix (trauma and status epilepticus populations skew male in some cohorts) rather than an intrinsic biological sex effect. - Mortality is independently associated with age ≤18 years in pooled analyses (Fong JJ et al., "Predictors of mortality in patients with suspected propofol infusion syndrome," PMID: 18664783), alongside male sex, vasopressor use, cardiac symptoms, metabolic acidosis, renal failure, hypotension, rhabdomyolysis, and dyslipidemia.
There is no single confirmatory test; diagnosis is clinical and biochemical, based on the temporal association with propofol exposure plus the characteristic constellation of findings, after excluding alternative explanations.
Laboratory tests / biomarkers: - Creatine kinase (CK): central surveillance marker. CK >10,000 U/L is typical at diagnosis of overt PRIS; a cutoff <5,000 U/L identifies a low-risk population. Rising CK over 24–48 hours of infusion, in the absence of other muscle pathology, should raise suspicion. - Serum lactate: unexplained/rising metabolic (lactic) acidosis is a core diagnostic feature and an early warning sign. - Triglycerides: rising triglyceride levels have been proposed as a reliable early biomarker of impending PRIS, reflecting both impaired lipid clearance/oxidation and the propofol lipid-emulsion vehicle load. - Troponin T and myoglobin: elevated in cases with cardiac and skeletal muscle involvement respectively. - Malonylcarnitine and C5-acylcarnitine species: research-level biomarkers of impaired fatty-acid oxidation, elevated in PRIS (Wolf et al. 2001). - Arterial blood gas for base deficit/pH.
Electrophysiology: Continuous or serial 12-lead ECG monitoring for the Brugada-pattern ECG (down-sloping ST-segment elevation in leads V1–V3) is a critical diagnostic and prognostic tool — its appearance is a harbinger of imminent, often fatal, ventricular arrhythmia and should prompt emergency propofol discontinuation (Vernooy K et al., PMC1474111).
Imaging: Echocardiography to assess for new cardiomyopathy/reduced ejection fraction; abdominal imaging or clinical exam for hepatomegaly.
Genetic testing: Not part of routine acute diagnosis, but should be considered after an episode of unexpectedly severe or low-dose-triggered PRIS, to evaluate for an underlying primary mitochondrial disease or fatty-acid oxidation disorder (targeted mitochondrial gene panel or exome sequencing, plasma acylcarnitine profile, and urine organic acids), particularly in pediatric survivors or in cases with a personal/family history suggestive of mitochondrial disease.
Differential diagnosis: Malignant hyperthermia (also produces hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, acidosis, but is triggered by volatile anesthetics/succinylcholine and driven by RYR1-mediated calcium dysregulation rather than mitochondrial FAO/ETC inhibition), serotonin syndrome, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, sepsis/septic cardiomyopathy (which can coexist with and confound PRIS diagnosis), and primary cardiac arrhythmic syndromes (congenital Brugada syndrome, which can also be pharmacologically unmasked by other agents).
Screening: No population screening applies (acquired condition); the analogous "screening" practice is routine, protocolized biochemical surveillance (CK, triglycerides, lactate, arterial blood gas) in any patient receiving propofol >48 hours or at doses >4 mg/kg/h, per multiple society/expert guidance summarized in the anesthesia/critical care literature.
Mortality: Case-fatality rates in the published literature range from ~30% to ~51% depending on cohort (see §9); in a focused refractory-status-epilepticus PRIS cohort, mortality was 66% (13/21 patients). Historically (Bray 1998 index series) mortality was 12/15 (80%), reflecting both the severity of index cases and the absence at that time of modern rescue therapies (CRRT, ECMO).
Prognostic factors for mortality: - Adults: ECG changes (especially Brugada pattern), hypotension, hyperkalemia, traumatic brain injury, and mean propofol infusion rate >5 mg/kg/h. - Children: fever and hepatomegaly. - Across ages: age ≤18 years, male sex, vasopressor requirement, cardiac symptoms, metabolic acidosis, renal failure, hypotension, rhabdomyolysis, and dyslipidemia (Fong et al., PMID: 18664783).
Complications: Cardiac arrest/sudden death (via ventricular fibrillation/refractory bradyarrhythmia); acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy; hepatic dysfunction; compartment syndrome from rhabdomyolysis; and, in survivors of cardiac arrest, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury as a secondary complication.
Recovery potential: With early recognition (biochemical surveillance catching the "pre-PRIS" phase) and immediate propofol discontinuation plus aggressive supportive/rescue therapy, biochemical and ECG abnormalities can fully resolve and patients can recover without lasting organ dysfunction. Case reports document dramatic recovery of cardiac function (e.g., LVEF improving from severely reduced to 35–40% and normal RV function) after ECMO support, with successful weaning. Conversely, once refractory ventricular arrhythmia/electrical storm develops, mortality is very high despite maximal intervention.
Prognostic biomarkers: Persistently or acutely rising CK, triglycerides, and lactate, and especially the appearance of the Brugada-pattern ECG, are the strongest available predictors of imminent deterioration and should trigger escalation of care.
There is no drug-specific antidote; management is immediate cessation of the causal exposure plus problem-driven, organ-supportive critical care.
No established PharmGKB/CPIC gene-drug pairing exists for propofol dosing with respect to PRIS risk specifically, though patients with known primary FAO or mitochondrial disorders are managed with propofol avoidance or extreme caution as a matter of clinical practice rather than formal pharmacogenomic guideline.
NCIT:C49236 Therapeutic Procedure (general)NCIT:C15747 Supportive CareNo registered clinical trials were identified specifically targeting PRIS treatment (as opposed to prevention-focused propofol dosing trials); management remains guideline/expert-consensus and case-report-derived rather than trial-validated.
Primary prevention (avoiding the causal exposure/dose): - Limit propofol infusion to <4 mg/kg/h where clinically feasible, and avoid sustained infusions beyond 48 hours at high doses; use the lowest effective dose and shortest necessary duration. - Favor propofol-sparing, multimodal sedation strategies — combining lower-dose propofol with adjuncts such as dexmedetomidine, benzodiazepines, or opioids to reduce cumulative propofol exposure, particularly in high-risk populations (TBI, refractory status epilepticus, pediatric patients). - Ensure adequate carbohydrate (glucose) provision during critical illness/prolonged sedation to reduce forced reliance on the fatty-acid oxidation pathway that propofol impairs. - Use caution with concomitant catecholamine and glucocorticoid administration in patients on high-dose propofol, recognizing the mechanistic synergy demonstrated experimentally (noradrenaline potentiates propofol-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in human skeletal muscle cells). - Avoid propofol entirely, or use with extreme caution and specialist input, in patients with known or suspected primary mitochondrial disease or fatty-acid β-oxidation disorders — a pharmacogenetically informed avoidance strategy rather than dose modification.
Secondary prevention (early detection): - Protocolized serial biochemical monitoring (arterial blood gas/lactate, CK, triglycerides) for any patient receiving propofol infusion >48 hours or at doses approaching/exceeding 4 mg/kg/h, to catch the "pre-PRIS" biochemical phase before cardiac decompensation. - Continuous or serial ECG monitoring for early detection of the Brugada-pattern change, which should trigger immediate drug discontinuation.
Tertiary prevention: Prompt discontinuation and organ-supportive care at first biochemical or electrophysiological sign, as above, to prevent progression to fulminant, often-fatal cardiac collapse.
Genetic counseling: Relevant not for PRIS itself but for family members of a patient found, via a PRIS episode, to carry a primary mitochondrial or FAO disorder — standard genetic counseling for the underlying Mendelian/mitochondrial condition applies once identified.
Public health/institutional measures: Institutional sedation protocols and pharmacy/ICU guidelines capping propofol dose/duration, mandating biomarker surveillance, and specifying escalation triggers represent the practical "prophylaxis" infrastructure described across the clinical review literature (Fudickar A, Bein B, "The propofol infusion 'syndrome' in intensive care unit: from pathophysiology to prophylaxis and treatment," PMID: 18652104).
PRIS is not a naturally occurring veterinary disease entity in the sense of a spontaneously arising condition, but it is a recognized iatrogenic risk in veterinary anesthesia/sedation practice wherever propofol is used for prolonged infusion sedation in companion or laboratory animals, by direct pharmacological analogy to the human syndrome — no dedicated veterinary literature specific to spontaneous PRIS case series was surfaced in this search, and this section is best understood through the experimental-model lens in §15 rather than as natural disease.
Taxonomy of species used in experimental modeling: rat (Rattus norvegicus, NCBITaxon:10116), mouse (Mus musculus, NCBITaxon:10090), rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus, NCBITaxon:9986) — see §15.
Comparative biology: The core molecular targets (CPT1, mitochondrial Complexes I/III, coenzyme Q) are highly conserved across mammals, which is why rodent and rabbit models recapitulate the human bioenergetic lesion faithfully at the mitochondrial/cellular level, even though whole-organism experimental PRIS models are engineered (via deliberate high-dose infusion) rather than naturally occurring.
Zoonotic potential: Not applicable — this is a pharmacotoxic, not an infectious, condition.
| Model | Species/system | What it captures | Fidelity notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isolated-perfused newborn mouse heart | Mus musculus (ex vivo) | Acute propofol-induced cardiotoxicity — ECG, ventricular contractile force, oxygen extraction measured over 30 min toxic-dose exposure; a proposed ex-vivo model relevant specifically to pediatric PRIS (PMC9350423) | High fidelity for the acute cardiac electromechanical phenotype in the developing heart; does not capture the full multi-organ (renal/hepatic) syndrome |
| Newborn murine cardiac mitochondria (in vitro) | Mus musculus | Mitochondrial respiration, membrane potential, and respiratory chain complex kinetics directly exposed to propofol/Intralipid (Pediatr Res 2022) | Isolates the mitochondrial mechanism cleanly from whole-organ/systemic confounders |
| Murine skeletal muscle injury model | Mus musculus (in vivo) | Basic mechanistic study of PRIS-associated skeletal muscle injury (PMC6712282) | Captures the rhabdomyolysis-relevant skeletal muscle arm of the syndrome |
| Rat model of sepsis + propofol | Rattus norvegicus (in vivo) | Demonstrates propofol increases morbidity/mortality in the setting of sepsis, mechanistically supporting the clinical sepsis risk-factor association (Crit Care 2015) | Models the gene-environment-like interaction between a systemic inflammatory state and propofol toxicity, though this is an environment-environment interaction rather than a genetic one |
| Rat isolated mitochondria / respiratory chain studies | Rattus norvegicus (ex vivo) | Identified coenzyme Q as the principal electron-transport-chain interaction site for propofol | Mechanistic, subcellular-level model |
| Rabbit PRIS model | Oryctolagus cuniculus (in vivo) | Whole-animal PRIS induction with survival and organ-injury endpoints; used to test coenzyme Q10 as a rescue therapy (PMC10584382) | Closest available whole-organism model to the clinical multi-organ syndrome; supports a translational candidate therapy |
| Human primary skeletal muscle cell culture | Homo sapiens (in vitro, primary cells) | Direct demonstration of clinically-relevant-concentration propofol inhibiting fatty-acid oxidation and reducing ETC spare capacity and ATP synthesis; also used to show noradrenaline potentiates the mitochondrial injury (PMID: 29240609; PMC9643307) | Highest translational relevance since it uses human tissue directly, though it cannot capture the whole-organism cardiac/renal phenotype |
Model limitations common across the set: most models are acute/short-duration exposures (30 minutes to hours) rather than the 48-hour-plus infusions characteristic of clinical PRIS, and none fully recapitulates the combined multi-organ syndrome (cardiac + renal + hepatic + metabolic) simultaneously in a single system — each model instead isolates one mechanistic or organ-specific arm of the human disease.
Research applications: These models collectively support (a) the mitochondrial FAO/ETC inhibition mechanism, (b) the catecholamine-potentiation and sepsis-potentiation risk-factor mechanisms, (c) age-specific (developing heart) vulnerability, and (d) candidate rescue therapies (coenzyme Q10) — directly informing the pathophysiology and prevention/treatment sections above.
CHEBI:44915 (propofol)Checked with linkml-reference-validator 0.3.0rc3.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| References checked | 25 |
| Resolved | 25 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| Quoted claims checked | 1 |
| Quoted claims found in source | 1 |
| Quoted claims not found in source | 0 |
| References weighed for topical relevance | 25 |
| On topic | 21 |
| Off topic | 0 |
All extracted references resolved successfully.
Checked with linkml-term-validator 0.4.5, through the ols: adapter.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| Terms checked | 40 |
| Resolved | 35 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Obsolete | 1 |
| Unverifiable | 4 |
| Terms whose name was checked | 26 |
| Terms named correctly | 20 |
| Terms named as a different term | 1 |
| Terms whose name is worth a second look | 5 |
These identifiers resolve, so nothing about them looks wrong, and the ontology calls them something unrelated to what the report calls them. That usually means the identifier is not the one the sentence needs:
CL:1001603 (1 mention) - the report calls it "kidney proximal tubule epithelial cell, relevant to myoglobin-mediated AKI"; CL calls it lung macrophageThese terms are real but deprecated. Citing one is not a fabrication; it does mean the report is naming something the ontology has retired:
GO:0055114 (obsolete oxidation-reduction process) (1 mention)The report's name for these is recognisably related to the term's own name without being one of them. A loose paraphrase reads the same way as a citation of the wrong sibling term - and so does a related synonym, which the ontology records precisely because it names something adjacent rather than the same thing - so these are listed rather than judged:
HP:0002910 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Elevated hepatic transaminase"; HP calls it Elevated circulating hepatic transaminase concentration, and lists "Elevated transaminases" among its other namesGO:0055114 (1 mention) - the report calls it "oxidation-reduction process"; GO calls it obsolete oxidation-reduction processCL:0000746 (3 mentions) - the report calls it "cardiac muscle cell", "Cardiac muscle tissue → cardiomyocytes"; CL calls it cardiac muscle cell, and lists "cardiac muscle fiber" among its other namesCL:0000188 (3 mentions) - the report calls it "skeletal muscle fiber", "Skeletal muscle tissue → skeletal myofibers"; CL calls it cell of skeletal muscle, and lists "skeletal muscle cell" among its other namesCL:0000182 (3 mentions) - the report calls it "hepatocyte", "Liver parenchyma → hepatocytes"; CL calls it hepatocyteThe report gives these identifiers more than one name of its own:
CL:0000746 - called "cardiac muscle cell", "Cardiac muscle tissue → cardiomyocytes"CL:0000188 - called "skeletal muscle fiber", "Skeletal muscle tissue → skeletal myofibers"CL:0000182 - called "hepatocyte", "Liver parenchyma → hepatocytes"