Ocular melanoma is a malignant melanocytic neoplasm arising from the structures of the eye or ocular adnexa. It is not one homogeneous disease: the dominant form is uveal melanoma (choroid, ciliary body, iris), the commonest primary intraocular malignancy of adults, while conjunctival melanoma is a much rarer ocular-surface (mucosal) melanoma that is biologically distinct. Uveal melanoma is initiated by near-mutually-exclusive activating mutations in the Gq/G11 alpha subunits GNAQ and GNA11 (and, in wild-type tumours, CYSLTR2 or PLCB4), which drive constitutive PLC-beta/PKC/MAPK signalling and Hippo-independent YAP activation. Prognosis is stratified by a secondary driver acquired later in tumour evolution: BAP1 loss with monosomy 3 confers high metastatic risk, SF3B1 mutation an intermediate or late risk, and EIF1AX mutation a low risk. Roughly half of uveal melanoma patients ultimately metastasise, almost exclusively via a haematogenous, hepatotropic route, and metastatic disease is largely refractory to immune-checkpoint blockade because the tumour mutational burden is low. Tebentafusp, a gp100 x CD3 ImmTAC bispecific, is the first agent to improve overall survival in metastatic disease but is restricted to HLA-A*02:01-positive patients. Conjunctival melanoma, by contrast, resembles cutaneous melanoma (BRAF, NRAS, NF1 and TERT promoter mutations, UV signature), usually arises from a conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial precursor, and spreads first to regional lymph nodes.
Ask a research question about Ocular Melanoma. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
Conditions with similar clinical presentations that must be differentiated from Ocular Melanoma:
name: Ocular Melanoma
creation_date: '2026-08-01T05:30:00Z'
description: >-
Ocular melanoma is a malignant melanocytic neoplasm arising from the
structures of the eye or ocular adnexa. It is not one homogeneous disease:
the dominant form is uveal melanoma (choroid, ciliary body, iris), the
commonest primary intraocular malignancy of adults, while conjunctival
melanoma is a much rarer ocular-surface (mucosal) melanoma that is
biologically distinct. Uveal melanoma is initiated by near-mutually-exclusive
activating mutations in the Gq/G11 alpha subunits GNAQ and GNA11 (and, in
wild-type tumours, CYSLTR2 or PLCB4), which drive constitutive
PLC-beta/PKC/MAPK signalling and Hippo-independent YAP activation. Prognosis
is stratified by a secondary driver acquired later in tumour evolution:
BAP1 loss with monosomy 3 confers high metastatic risk, SF3B1 mutation an
intermediate or late risk, and EIF1AX mutation a low risk. Roughly half of
uveal melanoma patients ultimately metastasise, almost exclusively via a
haematogenous, hepatotropic route, and metastatic disease is largely
refractory to immune-checkpoint blockade because the tumour mutational
burden is low. Tebentafusp, a gp100 x CD3 ImmTAC bispecific, is the first
agent to improve overall survival in metastatic disease but is restricted to
HLA-A*02:01-positive patients. Conjunctival melanoma, by contrast, resembles
cutaneous melanoma (BRAF, NRAS, NF1 and TERT promoter mutations, UV
signature), usually arises from a conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial
precursor, and spreads first to regional lymph nodes.
categories:
- Ocular Malignancy
- Oncogene-Driven Cancer
category: Cancer
synonyms:
- eye melanoma
- melanoma of the eye
- intraocular melanoma
parents:
- ocular cancer
- melanoma
disease_term:
preferred_term: ocular melanoma
term:
id: MONDO:0006325
label: ocular melanoma
has_subtypes:
- name: Uveal Melanoma
display_name: Uveal Melanoma (choroid, ciliary body, iris)
description: >-
Melanoma of the uveal tract, accounting for the large majority of ocular
melanomas and for essentially all primary intraocular melanoma in adults.
Initiated by GNAQ/GNA11 (or CYSLTR2/PLCB4) activating mutations, stratified
prognostically by BAP1/SF3B1/EIF1AX status and chromosome 3/8q copy number,
and characterised by haematogenous liver-dominant metastasis. Curated in
depth as its own dismech entry (Uveal_Melanoma).
subtype_term:
preferred_term: uveal melanoma
term:
id: MONDO:0006486
label: uveal melanoma
children:
- Choroidal Melanoma
- Ciliary Body Melanoma
- Iris Melanoma
locations:
- preferred_term: uvea
term:
id: UBERON:0001768
label: uvea
genes:
- preferred_term: GNAQ
term:
id: hgnc:4390
label: GNAQ
- preferred_term: GNA11
term:
id: hgnc:4379
label: GNA11
- preferred_term: BAP1
term:
id: hgnc:950
label: BAP1
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41097064
reference_title: 'Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular
Biology.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Uveal melanoma is predominantly driven by mutations in GNAQ and GNA11,\
\ along with alterations in BAP1, SF3B1, and\nEIF1AX, which are key prognostic\
\ determinants."
explanation: Establishes uveal melanoma as the GNAQ/GNA11-driven arm of ocular
melanoma with BAP1/SF3B1/EIF1AX prognostic stratification.
- name: Choroidal Melanoma
description: >-
Uveal melanoma of the choroid, the commonest site (approximately 90% of
uveal melanomas). Typically presents as a pigmented dome-shaped or
collar-button subretinal mass with exudative retinal detachment, or is
found incidentally on routine fundus examination.
subtype_term:
preferred_term: malignant choroid melanoma
term:
id: MONDO:0003878
label: malignant choroid melanoma
locations:
- preferred_term: optic choroid
term:
id: UBERON:0001776
label: optic choroid
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19667335
reference_title: Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033
consecutive eyes.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Of the 7256 eyes with choroidal melanoma, the mean tumor \nthickness was\
\ 5.5 mm and metastasis occurred in 8%, 15%, and 25% at 3, 5, and 10 \nyears,\
\ respectively."
explanation: Choroidal melanoma accounted for 7256 of 8033 uveal melanoma eyes in
this series (about 90%), the site predominance asserted here, with its associated
metastasis rates.
- name: Ciliary Body Melanoma
description: >-
Uveal melanoma arising in the ciliary body. Uncommon (roughly 6-7% of uveal
melanomas) but adversely prognostic because it is detected late and
ciliary-body involvement is itself an adverse AJCC staging feature.
subtype_term:
preferred_term: malignant ciliary body melanoma
term:
id: MONDO:0003912
label: malignant ciliary body melanoma
locations:
- preferred_term: ciliary body
term:
id: UBERON:0001775
label: ciliary body
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19667335
reference_title: Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033
consecutive eyes.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Of the 492 eyes with ciliary body melanoma, the mean tumor \nthickness\
\ was 6.6 mm and metastasis occurred in 12%, 19%, and 33% at 3, 5, and \n10 years,\
\ respectively."
explanation: Ciliary body melanoma was 492 of 8033 eyes (about 6%) and carried
markedly higher metastasis rates than choroidal or iris melanoma, supporting both
the frequency and the adverse-prognosis claims made here.
- name: Iris Melanoma
description: >-
Uveal melanoma arising in the iris, the least common uveal site (roughly
3%). Presents one to two decades earlier than posterior uveal melanoma
and is usually visible as an enlarging pigmented iris lesion, sometimes
with heterochromia, corectopia or secondary glaucoma; prognosis is
generally favourable because of early detection and smaller tumour size.
subtype_term:
preferred_term: iris melanoma
term:
id: MONDO:0004064
label: iris melanoma
locations:
- preferred_term: iris
term:
id: UBERON:0001769
label: iris
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19667335
reference_title: Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033
consecutive eyes.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Of the 285 eyes with iris melanoma, the mean tumor thickness was \n2.7\
\ mm and metastasis occurred in 0.5%, 4%, and 7% at 3, 5, and 10 years, \nrespectively."
explanation: Iris melanoma was 285 of 8033 eyes (about 3.5%), the smallest and
thinnest tumours with by far the lowest metastasis rates, supporting the rarity
and favourable prognosis asserted here.
- name: Conjunctival Melanoma
display_name: Conjunctival Melanoma (ocular-surface/mucosal)
description: >-
Melanoma of the conjunctival epithelium, most often bulbar and near the
limbus. This is NOT a uveal melanoma and must not be conflated with one:
it is an ocular-surface mucosal melanoma whose driver landscape (BRAF,
NRAS, NF1, TERT promoter, UV signature) resembles cutaneous rather than
uveal melanoma, it usually arises from a conjunctival melanocytic
intraepithelial precursor lesion, and it spreads first through conjunctival
lymphatics to regional nodes rather than by the liver-dominant
haematogenous route of uveal disease. Incidence is roughly 1 per million
per year and rising.
subtype_term:
preferred_term: malignant conjunctival melanoma
term:
id: MONDO:0002096
label: malignant conjunctival melanoma
locations:
- preferred_term: conjunctiva
term:
id: UBERON:0001811
label: conjunctiva
genes:
- preferred_term: BRAF
term:
id: hgnc:1097
label: BRAF
- preferred_term: NRAS
term:
id: hgnc:7989
label: NRAS
- preferred_term: NF1
term:
id: hgnc:7765
label: NF1
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41097064
reference_title: 'Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular
Biology.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Conversely, conjunctival and\neyelid melanoma exhibits greater molecular\
\ similarity to cutaneous melanoma,\ncommonly involving BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and\
\ TERT promoter mutations."
explanation: Directly supports treating conjunctival melanoma as a molecularly
distinct, cutaneous-like arm of ocular melanoma rather than a uveal subtype.
- reference: PMID:34015548
reference_title: 'Conjunctival melanoma: New insights in tumour genetics and immunology,
leading to new therapeutic options.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "CoM is characterized by mutations that have also been identified in\
\ \ncutaneous melanoma, e.g. in BRAF, NRAS and TERT. These mutations are distinct\
\ \nfrom the mutations found in uveal melanoma (UM), affecting genes such as\
\ GNAQ, \nGNA11, and BAP1."
explanation: Explicitly contrasts the conjunctival and uveal driver landscapes,
justifying the split modelled here.
prevalence:
- subtype: Uveal Melanoma
population: United States (SEER 1973-2013, all races)
measure_type: ANNUAL_INCIDENCE
prevalence_class: BAND_1_9_PER_1000000
rate_per_100000: 0.52
rate_low: 0.5
rate_high: 0.54
notes: >-
Reported as a mean age-adjusted incidence of 5.2 per million per year
(95% CI 5.0-5.4), normalised here to 0.52 per 100,000 per year.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29765944
reference_title: 'Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival
(SEER 1973-2013).'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The mean age-adjusted incidence was 5.2 per million (95% \nCI 5.0-5.4)."
explanation: SEER-derived age-adjusted annual incidence of uveal melanoma in the
United States.
- subtype: Conjunctival Melanoma
population: Worldwide
measure_type: ANNUAL_INCIDENCE
prevalence_class: BAND_1_9_PER_1000000
rate_per_100000: 0.1
notes: >-
Reported as a global incidence of approximately 1 in a million per year,
rising at a rate ratio of about 1.4 and increasing sharply above age 65.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39335093
reference_title: 'Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Its global incidence of ~1 in a million is increasing at a rate ratio\
\ of ~1.4, \nbut this rises sharply in over 65-year-olds."
explanation: Provides the conjunctival melanoma incidence figure and its rising
trend, confirming it is far rarer than uveal melanoma.
pathophysiology:
- name: Gq/G11 Alpha Subunit Activating Mutation
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
role: trigger
conforms_to: sustaining_proliferative_signaling#Oncogenic Growth-Signal Lesion
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
The initiating lesion of uveal melanoma is a somatic activating mutation in
the heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunits GNAQ or GNA11, occurring almost
always at Q209 (in the Ras-like domain, the residue essential for GTP
hydrolysis) and less often at R183. Loss of intrinsic GTPase activity locks
the alpha subunit in its GTP-bound, constitutively active state, turning it
into a dominant-acting oncogene. GNAQ and GNA11 mutations are mutually
exclusive and together account for roughly 83% of primary uveal melanomas;
the rare GNAQ/GNA11-wild-type tumours instead carry activating CYSLTR2
p.Leu129 or PLCB4 p.Asp630 mutations, which enter the same pathway one step
above or below. These are early events, present already in benign uveal
naevi, and are not themselves prognostic.
locations:
- preferred_term: uvea
term:
id: UBERON:0001768
label: uvea
cell_types:
- preferred_term: choroidal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:4030000
label: choroidal melanocyte
molecular_functions:
- preferred_term: GTPase activity
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0003924
label: GTPase activity
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling
pathway
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0007200
label: phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway
genes:
- preferred_term: GNAQ
term:
id: hgnc:4390
label: GNAQ
- preferred_term: GNA11
term:
id: hgnc:4379
label: GNA11
- preferred_term: CYSLTR2
term:
id: hgnc:18274
label: CYSLTR2
- preferred_term: PLCB4
term:
id: hgnc:9059
label: PLCB4
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19078957
reference_title: Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue
naevi.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The mutations occur exclusively in codon 209 in the Ras-like domain\
\ and \nresult in constitutive activation, turning GNAQ into a dominant acting\
\ oncogene."
explanation: Establishes the Q209 mechanism (loss of GTP hydrolysis) and the dominant
oncogene status of mutant GNAQ.
- reference: PMID:21083380
reference_title: Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Of the uveal melanomas we analyzed, 83% had somatic mutations in \n\
GNAQ or GNA11. Constitutive activation of the pathway involving these two genes\
\ \nappears to be a major contributor to the development of uveal melanoma."
explanation: Quantifies the combined GNAQ/GNA11 mutation burden and identifies
constitutive pathway activation as the major initiating contributor.
downstream:
- target: PLC-beta/PKC/MAPK Cascade Activation
description: >-
Active Gq/G11 stimulates phospholipase C-beta, releasing diacylglycerol
that activates protein kinase C and thence the RAF-MEK-ERK cascade.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19078957
reference_title: Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue
naevi.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "Signaling pathways downstream of GNAQ include activation of protein\
\ kinase C family members via the release of diacylglycerol (DAG) by phospholipase\
\ Cβ."
explanation: States the Gq to PLC-beta to DAG to PKC arm of the cascade that
this edge asserts.
- target: Hippo-Independent YAP Activation
description: >-
Gq alpha additionally signals through a Trio-Rho/Rac circuit to activate
the transcriptional coactivator YAP, in parallel with and independently of
the PLC-beta arm.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:24882515
reference_title: Hippo-independent activation of YAP by the GNAQ uveal melanoma
oncogene through a trio-regulated rho GTPase signaling circuitry.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "We found that Gαq stimulates YAP through a \nTrio-Rho/Rac signaling\
\ circuitry promoting actin polymerization, independently of \nphospholipase\
\ Cβ and the canonical Hippo pathway."
explanation: Directly supports a PLC-beta-independent, Hippo-independent Gq-to-YAP
edge.
- name: PLC-beta/PKC/MAPK Cascade Activation
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
role: central_effector
conforms_to: sustaining_proliferative_signaling#Constitutive Mitogenic Pathway Activation
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
Constitutively GTP-bound Gq/G11 activates phospholipase C-beta, generating
diacylglycerol that activates protein kinase C, which in turn engages the
RAF-MEK-ERK cascade (with RASGRP3 as an important uveal-melanoma-specific
link) and the PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis. This is the growth-factor-independent
mitogenic output of the initiating lesion. Critically, uveal melanomas
achieve MAPK activation without BRAF or NRAS mutation, which is the
mechanistic reason cutaneous-melanoma BRAF-directed therapy is inapplicable
to uveal disease and the rationale for PKC inhibitors such as darovasertib.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: choroidal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:4030000
label: choroidal melanocyte
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: protein kinase C signaling
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0070528
label: protein kinase C signaling
- preferred_term: MAPK cascade
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0000165
label: MAPK cascade
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19078957
reference_title: Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue
naevi.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "Uveal melanomas display MAP-kinase activation15, but none of the uveal\
\ melanomas we examined in our study showed mutations in BRAF or NRAS"
explanation: Establishes that uveal melanoma has MAPK activation despite lacking
the BRAF/NRAS mutations that drive cutaneous melanoma, i.e. an alternative route
into the same cascade.
downstream:
- target: Uveal Melanocyte Transformation and Intraocular Tumour Growth
description: >-
Sustained ERK signalling drives cell-cycle entry and anchorage-independent
growth of uveal melanocytes.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19078957
reference_title: Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue
naevi.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "In addition, GNAQ knock-down in OMM1.3 cells causes a substantial\
\ decrease in cell number (Figure 3b), loss of anchorage independent growth\
\ (Figure 3c) and a marked increase in sub-G0/G1 population (Figure 3d) as\
\ compared to control cells."
explanation: Loss-of-function knockdown reverses proliferation and anchorage-independent
growth, showing the cascade is required for the transformed phenotype.
- name: Hippo-Independent YAP Activation
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
role: amplifier
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
In parallel with the PKC/MAPK arm, oncogenic Gq alpha activates the
Hippo-pathway transcriptional coactivator YAP through a Trio-Rho/Rac
GTPase circuit that promotes actin polymerisation. This activation is
independent of both phospholipase C-beta and the canonical Hippo kinase
cascade, and Gq-driven uveal melanoma cell growth is YAP-dependent -
making YAP/TAZ a distinct therapeutic node from the MAPK arm.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: choroidal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:4030000
label: choroidal melanocyte
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: Rho protein signal transduction
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0007266
label: Rho protein signal transduction
- preferred_term: actin cytoskeleton organization
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0030036
label: actin cytoskeleton organization
evidence:
- reference: PMID:24882515
reference_title: Hippo-independent activation of YAP by the GNAQ uveal melanoma
oncogene through a trio-regulated rho GTPase signaling circuitry.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "Furthermore, we show that Gαq promotes the YAP-dependent growth of uveal\
\ \nmelanoma cells, thereby identifying YAP as a suitable therapeutic target\
\ in uveal \nmelanoma, a GNAQ/GNA11-initiated human malignancy."
explanation: Establishes YAP dependence of Gq-driven uveal melanoma growth and
its status as a therapeutic node.
downstream:
- target: Uveal Melanocyte Transformation and Intraocular Tumour Growth
description: >-
YAP-dependent transcriptional programmes contribute to the growth of
Gq-driven uveal melanoma cells alongside the MAPK arm.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:24882515
reference_title: Hippo-independent activation of YAP by the GNAQ uveal melanoma
oncogene through a trio-regulated rho GTPase signaling circuitry.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "Furthermore, we show that Gαq promotes the YAP-dependent growth of\
\ uveal \nmelanoma cells"
explanation: Directly asserts the YAP-to-growth edge in uveal melanoma cells.
- name: Uveal Melanocyte Transformation and Intraocular Tumour Growth
biological_scale: TISSUE
role: central_effector
conforms_to: sustaining_proliferative_signaling#Growth-Factor-Independent Proliferation
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
Convergent PKC/MAPK and YAP signalling transforms a uveal melanocyte into a
growth-factor-independent clone that expands as an intraocular mass, most
often in the choroid (about 90%), less often the ciliary body (about 6-7%) or
iris (about 3%). Expansion under the retina produces exudation and
secondary retinal detachment; anterior tumours can distort the iris and
obstruct aqueous outflow. Because the globe is a closed, non-distensible
compartment, growth is symptomatic disproportionately early relative to
tumour bulk - yet up to about 30% of tumours are still asymptomatic at
diagnosis and are found on routine fundoscopy.
locations:
- preferred_term: uvea
term:
id: UBERON:0001768
label: uvea
cell_types:
- preferred_term: choroidal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:4030000
label: choroidal melanocyte
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: cell population proliferation
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0008283
label: cell population proliferation
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39200222
reference_title: 'Uveal Melanoma: Comprehensive Review of Its Pathophysiology,
Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Perspectives.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults.
explanation: Confirms the intraocular tumour that this node describes is the commonest
adult intraocular malignancy.
downstream:
- target: Uveal Melanoma
description: >-
The expanding transformed uveal melanocyte clone is the intraocular
melanoma itself.
- target: Reduced Visual Acuity
description: >-
Tumour involvement of the macula, exudation, or obstruction of the visual
axis reduces acuity.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and
mortality in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Thirty-four patients (49%) presented with blurred vision."
explanation: Blurred vision was the commonest presenting symptom of the intraocular
tumour, supporting this tumour-growth-to-acuity-loss edge.
- target: Visual Field Defect
description: >-
A tumour mass and its associated serous retinal detachment produce a field
defect corresponding to the involved retinal sector.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and
mortality in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "In multivariate regression, retinal detachment (RD), presence of VM,\
\ and PAS density ≥ median were independent predictors of a shadow"
explanation: Retinal detachment was an independent predictor of the visual-field
shadow, directly supporting this tumour-and-detachment to field-defect edge.
- target: Exudative Retinal Detachment
description: >-
Subretinal exudation from the tumour surface separates the neurosensory
retina from the retinal pigment epithelium.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19667335
reference_title: Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033
consecutive eyes.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "the presence of subretinal\
\ fluid, intraocular hemorrhage, or \nextraocular extension"
explanation: Subretinal fluid is documented as a tumour-associated clinical finding
in this 8033-eye series, supporting the tumour-to-exudative-detachment edge.
- target: Photopsia
description: >-
Mechanical traction and detachment at the tumour-retina interface produce
perceived flashes of light.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and
mortality in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "7 (10%) with \nphotopsia and/or floaters"
explanation: Photopsia was a documented presenting symptom of the intraocular
tumour in 10% of patients, supporting this edge.
- target: Vitreous Floaters
description: >-
Tumour-associated vitreous cells, pigment dispersion, or haemorrhage are
perceived as floaters.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and
mortality in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "7 (10%) with \nphotopsia and/or floaters"
explanation: Floaters were a documented presenting symptom of the intraocular
tumour in 10% of patients, supporting this edge.
- target: Secondary Glaucoma
description: >-
Anterior (iris/ciliary body) tumours and neovascularisation obstruct
aqueous outflow and raise intraocular pressure.
- target: Ocular Pain
description: >-
Large tumours, secondary glaucoma and anterior-segment involvement cause
ocular pain.
- target: BAP1 Loss with Monosomy 3
description: >-
The established tumour clone is the substrate on which the later,
prognosis-determining secondary driver event is acquired.
- target: Secondary Splicing/Translation-Factor Driver Stratification
description: >-
Disomy-3 tumour clones instead acquire SF3B1 or EIF1AX mutations, defining
the intermediate- and low-risk molecular classes.
- name: BAP1 Loss with Monosomy 3
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
role: driver
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
The single strongest determinant of metastatic risk in uveal melanoma is
biallelic inactivation of BAP1, a nuclear deubiquitinase acting in chromatin
regulation and the DNA-damage response, on chromosome 3p21.1. Inactivation
typically combines a somatic truncating or ubiquitin-hydrolase-domain
mutation on one allele with loss of the other chromosome 3 (monosomy 3).
Integrative TCGA analysis showed that BAP1 loss follows monosomy 3 in the
evolutionary sequence and imposes a globally distinct DNA methylation state,
defining the class-2 / poor-prognosis phenotype with epithelioid morphology
and early metastasis. A minority of patients carry a germline BAP1 variant
(BAP1 tumour-predisposition syndrome), which also raises risk of
mesothelioma, cutaneous melanoma and clear-cell renal carcinoma.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: choroidal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:4030000
label: choroidal melanocyte
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: protein deubiquitination
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0016579
label: protein deubiquitination
- preferred_term: chromatin organization
modifier: ABNORMAL
term:
id: GO:0006325
label: chromatin organization
genes:
- preferred_term: BAP1
term:
id: hgnc:950
label: BAP1
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21051595
reference_title: Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Inactivating somatic mutations were identified in the gene encoding\
\ \nBRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) on chromosome 3p21.1 in 26 of 31 (84%)\
\ \nmetastasizing tumors, including 15 mutations causing premature protein \n\
termination and 5 affecting its ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase domain."
explanation: The landmark observation linking BAP1 inactivation to metastasising
uveal melanoma, with the variant classes described here.
- reference: PMID:28810145
reference_title: Integrative Analysis Identifies Four Molecular and Clinical Subsets
in Uveal Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "We show that BAP1 loss follows M3 occurrence and correlates with a global\
\ DNA \nmethylation state that is distinct from D3-UM."
explanation: Establishes the temporal ordering of monosomy 3 before BAP1 loss
and the associated epigenomic reprogramming asserted in this node.
downstream:
- target: Haematogenous Dissemination Without Lymphatic Drainage
description: >-
BAP1-null, monosomy-3 tumours are the clones that seed distant metastasis;
BAP1 loss was found in 84% of metastasising tumours.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21051595
reference_title: Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "These findings implicate loss of BAP1 in \nuveal melanoma metastasis\
\ and suggest that the BAP1 pathway may be a valuable \ntherapeutic target."
explanation: The authors' own causal interpretation of BAP1 loss as implicated
in uveal melanoma metastasis.
- name: Secondary Splicing/Translation-Factor Driver Stratification
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
role: modifier
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
In disomy-3 tumours, which rarely metastasise, the secondary driver is
instead a hotspot mutation in the splicing factor SF3B1 (predominantly
Arg625, altering RNA splicing genome-wide) or an N-terminal in-frame
mutation in the translation-initiation factor EIF1AX. Both are essentially
mutually exclusive with BAP1 loss. SF3B1 mutation marks intermediate risk
with characteristically late relapse; EIF1AX mutation marks the lowest-risk
class. Together with BAP1 these three genes define the prognostic
stratification that governs surveillance intensity after successful local
treatment.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: choroidal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:4030000
label: choroidal melanocyte
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: mRNA splicing, via spliceosome
modifier: ABNORMAL
term:
id: GO:0000398
label: mRNA splicing, via spliceosome
genes:
- preferred_term: SF3B1
term:
id: hgnc:10768
label: SF3B1
- preferred_term: EIF1AX
term:
id: hgnc:3250
label: EIF1AX
evidence:
- reference: PMID:23313955
reference_title: Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Here, we describe mutations occurring exclusively at codon 625 of the\
\ SF3B1 gene, encoding splicing factor 3B subunit 1, in low-grade uveal \nmelanomas\
\ with good prognosis."
explanation: Establishes the SF3B1 Arg625 hotspot and its association with lower-grade,
better-prognosis uveal melanoma.
- reference: PMID:23793026
reference_title: Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic mutations in EIF1AX
and SF3B1 in uveal melanoma with disomy 3.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Using exome sequencing, we \nidentified recurrent somatic mutations\
\ in EIF1AX and SF3B1, specifically \noccurring in uveal melanomas with disomy\
\ 3, which rarely metastasize."
explanation: Ties both SF3B1 and EIF1AX mutation to the disomy-3, rarely metastasising
class described in this node.
downstream:
- target: Haematogenous Dissemination Without Lymphatic Drainage
description: >-
Disomy-3 SF3B1/EIF1AX tumours retain a real but much lower and often later
metastatic hazard than BAP1-null disease; SF3B1-mutant tumours in
particular can relapse many years after treatment.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:23793026
reference_title: Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic mutations in
EIF1AX and SF3B1 in uveal melanoma with disomy 3.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Resequencing of ten uveal melanomas with disomy 3 that developed metastases\
\ identified SF3B1 mutations in three tumors, none of which targeted Arg625."
explanation: Shows that disomy-3 tumours can still metastasise and that a non-Arg625
SF3B1 subset is enriched among those that do; supports the edge as a lower-hazard,
not absent, route.
- name: Haematogenous Dissemination Without Lymphatic Drainage
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: effector
conforms_to: invasion_and_metastasis#Circulatory Survival and Extravasation
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
The uveal tract has no lymphatic drainage, so uveal melanoma disseminates
exclusively by the blood. Tumour cells intravasate directly into the dense
choroidal vasculature and enter the systemic circulation, often long before
the primary tumour is treated - which is why excellent local control does
not prevent metastatic death. Dissemination is believed to be an early
event, with occult micrometastases persisting in a dormant state for years
to decades; fewer than 2% of patients have radiologically detectable
metastases at diagnosis, yet a third to a half develop them over the
following 15 years. This is the mechanistic point at which uveal and
conjunctival melanoma diverge most sharply.
locations:
- preferred_term: uvea
term:
id: UBERON:0001768
label: uvea
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: cell migration
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0016477
label: cell migration
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19078957
reference_title: Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue
naevi.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: One category, uveal melanoma, arises from melanocytes within the choroidal
plexus of the eye and is biologically distinct from cutaneous melanoma by characteristic
cytogenetic alterations4 and a very strong propensity to metastasize to the
liver5.
explanation: Documents the strong hepatic metastatic propensity that this dissemination
node feeds.
- reference: PMID:34839428
reference_title: Robotic Extended Ultrasound-Guided Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic
Metastases from Uveal Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "In contrast to cutaneous melanoma derivation, metastases mostly occur\
\ via hematogenous \nspread, in the absence of lymphatic drainage of the eye."
explanation: Directly sources this entry's hinge claim - that the eye lacks
lymphatic drainage, so uveal melanoma disseminates haematogenously - which is
what distinguishes the uveal from the conjunctival arm.
downstream:
- target: Hepatic Metastatic Colonisation
description: >-
Circulating uveal melanoma cells preferentially arrest, survive and
colonise the hepatic sinusoidal niche.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35227015
reference_title: Liver metastasis in uveal melanoma - treatment options and
clinical outcome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "In 90% of cases the liver is the first site of \nmetastasis, however\
\ the mechanisms underlying this hepatic tropism have not been \nelucidated."
explanation: Supports the hepatotropic direction of this dissemination edge.
- name: Hepatic Metastatic Colonisation
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: outcome
conforms_to: invasion_and_metastasis#Metastatic Colonization
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
Approximately half of uveal melanoma patients ultimately develop metastatic
disease, and it is overwhelmingly hepatotropic - the liver is the first and
dominant site in around 90% of cases, with lung and bone distant seconds.
Colonisation of the liver, not intravasation, is the rate-limiting step;
dormant micrometastases must acquire an angiogenic and immune-evasive
programme in the hepatic niche before becoming clinically detectable. Once
liver metastasis is established, historical median survival is on the order
of 6-12 months and hepatic tumour burden is the leading cause of death,
which is why liver-directed therapy remains central to management.
locations:
- preferred_term: liver
term:
id: UBERON:0002107
label: liver
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: positive regulation of angiogenesis
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0045766
label: positive regulation of angiogenesis
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35227015
reference_title: Liver metastasis in uveal melanoma - treatment options and clinical
outcome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Despite \nimprovements in the treatment of primary tumours, approximately\
\ 50% of patients \nwith UM will develop metastases. In 90% of cases the liver\
\ is the first site of \nmetastasis, however the mechanisms underlying this hepatic\
\ tropism have not been \nelucidated."
explanation: Directly documents the hepatotropic metastatic pattern that defines
this node.
downstream:
- target: Hepatic Metastasis
description: >-
Colonisation of the hepatic parenchyma manifests clinically as liver
metastases on surveillance imaging.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35227015
reference_title: Liver metastasis in uveal melanoma - treatment options and clinical
outcome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "In 90% of cases the liver is the first site of \nmetastasis"
explanation: Establishes that hepatic colonisation is the clinical manifestation
of metastasis in the great majority of cases.
- target: Low Tumour Mutational Burden and Checkpoint Refractoriness
description: >-
Established metastatic disease is the clinical setting in which the
low-neoantigen, immunologically cold phenotype becomes therapeutically
decisive.
- name: Low Tumour Mutational Burden and Checkpoint Refractoriness
biological_scale: CELLULAR
role: adaptive_escape
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
Unlike UV-driven cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma carries a very low
tumour mutational burden (of the order of 0.5 mutations per megabase) and
therefore presents few neoantigens. Combined with the immune-privileged
ocular environment, this yields an immunologically cold tumour in which PD-1
and CTLA-4 blockade - transformative in cutaneous melanoma - achieves only
marginal response rates. This is an important negative mechanistic claim
for this entry: the presence of a checkpoint axis is NOT the operative
mechanism here, and the entry deliberately does not declare conformance to
the immune_checkpoint_blockade module. The therapeutic solution instead
bypasses neoantigen dependence altogether by redirecting T cells against a
lineage antigen.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: T cell
term:
id: CL:0000084
label: T cell
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: immune response to tumor cell
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0002418
label: immune response to tumor cell
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34551229
reference_title: Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal
Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Uveal melanoma is a disease that is distinct from cutaneous \nmelanoma,\
\ with a low tumor mutational burden and a 1-year overall survival of \napproximately\
\ 50% in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma."
explanation: States the low tumour mutational burden and the poor metastatic survival
that together define this node.
- reference: PMID:38627362
reference_title: Uveal melanoma immunogenomics predict immunotherapy resistance
and susceptibility.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Immune checkpoint inhibition has shown success in treating metastatic\
\ cutaneous \nmelanoma but has limited efficacy against metastatic uveal melanoma,\
\ a rare \nvariant arising from the immune privileged eye."
explanation: States directly that checkpoint blockade, which succeeds in cutaneous
melanoma, has limited efficacy in uveal melanoma arising from the immune-privileged
eye - the central claim of this node.
downstream:
- target: gp100-Directed T-Cell Redirection
description: >-
Because neoantigen-dependent checkpoint blockade fails, therapy instead
redirects T cells against the melanocyte lineage antigen gp100 presented
on HLA-A*02:01.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34551229
reference_title: Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal
Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Tebentafusp is a bispecific protein consisting of an affinity-enhanced\
\ T-cell \nreceptor fused to an anti-CD3 effector that can redirect T cells\
\ to target \nglycoprotein 100-positive cells."
explanation: Describes precisely the redirection strategy that this edge asserts
as the response to checkpoint refractoriness.
- name: gp100-Directed T-Cell Redirection
biological_scale: CELLULAR
role: therapeutic_vulnerability
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
Uveal melanoma cells retain melanocytic lineage antigen expression,
including glycoprotein 100 (gp100/PMEL). Tebentafusp is an immune-mobilising
monoclonal T-cell receptor against cancer (ImmTAC): an affinity-enhanced
soluble TCR that binds a gp100 peptide presented by HLA-A*02:01, fused to an
anti-CD3 effector arm that recruits and activates any polyclonal T cell
irrespective of its own specificity. This side-steps the low-neoantigen
problem entirely, and it is the first mechanism to deliver a randomised
overall-survival benefit in metastatic uveal melanoma. The obligatory
dependence on HLA-A*02:01 presentation restricts eligibility to roughly half
of patients, and the on-target/off-tumour attack on normal gp100-positive
melanocytes produces the characteristic early rash and cytokine-mediated
pyrexia.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: T cell
term:
id: CL:0000084
label: T cell
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: T cell mediated cytotoxicity
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0001913
label: T cell mediated cytotoxicity
genes:
- preferred_term: PMEL
term:
id: hgnc:10880
label: PMEL
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34551229
reference_title: Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal
Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Overall survival at 1 year was 73% in the tebentafusp group and 59%\
\ in the control group"
explanation: The randomised phase 3 survival result establishing that this mechanism
is clinically effective.
- reference: PMID:37870955
reference_title: Three-Year Overall Survival with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal
Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "At a minimum follow-up of 36 months, median overall survival was 21.6\
\ \nmonths in the tebentafusp group and 16.9 months in the control group (hazard\
\ \nratio for death, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.87)."
explanation: Confirms the survival benefit is durable at three years.
- name: Conjunctival Melanocytic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
biological_scale: TISSUE
role: trigger
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
The conjunctival arm of ocular melanoma begins in a fundamentally different
compartment - the stratified squamous/mucosal epithelium of the conjunctival
surface, which is UV-exposed and lymphatic-bearing. Most conjunctival
melanomas arise from a precursor field of atypical intraepithelial
melanocytic proliferation (conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesion,
formerly primary acquired melanosis with atypia); a minority arise in a
pre-existing naevus or de novo. Because the precursor is a diffuse field
rather than a discrete mass, incomplete excision leaves residual atypical
epithelium and drives the high (roughly a third to a half) local recurrence
rate that dominates conjunctival melanoma morbidity.
locations:
- preferred_term: conjunctiva
term:
id: UBERON:0001811
label: conjunctiva
cell_types:
- preferred_term: melanocyte
term:
id: CL:0000148
label: melanocyte
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39335093
reference_title: 'Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "This review aims to provide a \ncomprehensive clinical overview of the\
\ current knowledge regarding Co-M, its \nepidemiology, pathogenesis, presentation,\
\ diagnosis and recent changes in the \nclassification of its precursor lesions,\
\ management, and recent advances in \nnovel biological therapies for personalised\
\ treatment of this disease."
explanation: Confirms that conjunctival melanoma has a recognised, recently reclassified
precursor-lesion pathway, as modelled by this node.
downstream:
- target: UV-Associated BRAF/NRAS/NF1 Driver Activation
description: >-
Within the atypical intraepithelial field, acquisition of a
cutaneous-melanoma-type MAPK driver converts the precursor to invasive
melanoma.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34071371
reference_title: Molecular Genetics of Conjunctival Melanoma and Prognostic Value
of TERT Promoter Mutation Analysis.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "TERT promoter mutations were most common (54%), but BRAF (46%), NRAS\
\ (21%), BAP1"
explanation: Quantifies the driver mutations actually present in invasive
conjunctival melanoma. Supports the driver-acquisition end of this edge; the
precursor-to-invasion transition itself is described but not separately
evidenced, so the item is marked PARTIAL.
- name: UV-Associated BRAF/NRAS/NF1 Driver Activation
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
role: driver
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
Conjunctival melanoma is driven by the mutation spectrum of cutaneous, not
uveal, melanoma: activating BRAF (commonly V600E) and NRAS (commonly Q61)
mutations, NF1 loss, and TERT promoter mutations, on a UV-signature
mutational background. GNAQ, GNA11 and BAP1 - the defining uveal genes -
are not the drivers here. The practical corollary is that BRAF/MEK-targeted
therapy and PD-1 blockade, which fail in uveal melanoma, are the rational
(if still evidence-thin) systemic options in conjunctival melanoma. This
node is the reason the two arms must be curated separately.
locations:
- preferred_term: conjunctiva
term:
id: UBERON:0001811
label: conjunctiva
cell_types:
- preferred_term: melanocyte
term:
id: CL:0000148
label: melanocyte
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: MAPK cascade
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0000165
label: MAPK cascade
genes:
- preferred_term: BRAF
term:
id: hgnc:1097
label: BRAF
- preferred_term: NRAS
term:
id: hgnc:7989
label: NRAS
- preferred_term: NF1
term:
id: hgnc:7765
label: NF1
- preferred_term: TERT
term:
id: hgnc:11730
label: TERT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34015548
reference_title: 'Conjunctival melanoma: New insights in tumour genetics and immunology,
leading to new therapeutic options.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Targeted therapies that are successful in cutaneous melanoma \nmay therefore\
\ be useful in CoM."
explanation: States the therapeutic corollary of the cutaneous-like driver landscape
asserted by this node.
- reference: PMID:41097064
reference_title: 'Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular
Biology.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Conversely, conjunctival and\neyelid melanoma exhibits greater molecular\
\ similarity to cutaneous melanoma,\ncommonly involving BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and\
\ TERT promoter mutations."
explanation: Names exactly the BRAF/NRAS/NF1/TERT driver set modelled in this
node.
downstream:
- target: Conjunctival Lymphatic and Regional Nodal Spread
description: >-
Invasive conjunctival melanoma gains access to conjunctival lymphatics and
disseminates first to regional lymph nodes.
- target: Conjunctival Melanocytic Lesion
description: >-
Driver acquisition within the intraepithelial field produces the visible
pigmented or amelanotic invasive conjunctival mass.
- name: Conjunctival Lymphatic and Regional Nodal Spread
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: consequence
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
Unlike the uvea, the conjunctiva has a rich lymphatic network. Conjunctival
melanoma therefore metastasises first and predominantly to the regional
(preauricular, submandibular, cervical) lymph nodes, with distant spread to
lung, liver and brain occurring later. Regional nodal metastasis is a
substantial contributor to conjunctival melanoma mortality; specific nodal
and disease-specific-mortality rates are not asserted here because no
quotable figure could be verified against a cached source (see notes).
This lymphatic-first route is the direct
mechanistic opposite of uveal melanoma's lymphatic-free, liver-dominant
haematogenous route, and it is why sentinel-node assessment is relevant in
conjunctival but not uveal disease.
locations:
- preferred_term: conjunctiva
term:
id: UBERON:0001811
label: conjunctiva
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: cell migration
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0016477
label: cell migration
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39335093
reference_title: 'Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Co-M is often \nmisdiagnosed or overlooked, leading to vision loss either\
\ from the destructive \neffects of the tumour or side effects of therapy, facial\
\ disfigurement from \nradical surgery, and death from metastases."
explanation: Documents that conjunctival melanoma is a metastasising, lethal disease
requiring the dissemination node modelled here.
- reference: PMID:32698034
reference_title: 'Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Eyelid and Conjunctival Malignancy:
A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Tumor-positive lymph nodes were found in 33 of 197 patients \n(16.8%),\
\ prompting recommendations for adjuvant treatments."
explanation: Directly documents regional lymph-node metastasis in eyelid and
conjunctival malignancy - the lymphatic route this node asserts. Note the AAO
cohort is mixed (85 of 197 were conjunctival melanoma), so the 16.8% figure is
not conjunctival-melanoma-specific and no rate is asserted in the description.
- reference: PMID:32698034
reference_title: 'Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Eyelid and Conjunctival Malignancy:
A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a promising procedure in patients \nwith\
\ eyelid and conjunctival malignancy, and it is useful in identifying \nsentinel\
\ lymph nodes."
explanation: Supports the entry's claim that sentinel-node assessment is relevant
in conjunctival - but not uveal - ocular melanoma.
phenotypes:
- category: Ocular
name: Uveal Melanoma
diagnostic: true
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
description: >-
An intraocular melanocytic malignancy of the uveal tract. This is the
dominant presentation of ocular melanoma and the commonest primary
intraocular malignancy of adults; approximately 90% arise in the choroid.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Uveal melanoma
term:
id: HP:0007716
label: Uveal melanoma
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39200222
reference_title: 'Uveal Melanoma: Comprehensive Review of Its Pathophysiology,
Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Perspectives.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults.
explanation: Establishes uveal melanoma as the dominant intraocular manifestation
of ocular melanoma.
- category: Ocular
name: Conjunctival Melanocytic Lesion
diagnostic: true
subtype: Conjunctival Melanoma
description: >-
A growing pigmented (brown or black) or amelanotic conjunctival lesion,
most often on the bulbar conjunctiva near the limbus, sometimes with feeder
vessels. This is the presenting sign of conjunctival melanoma. Coded to the
generic conjunctival-morphology HPO term because HPO has no dedicated
conjunctival melanoma class; the specific diagnosis is carried by the
Conjunctival Melanoma subtype and its MONDO binding.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Conjunctival melanocytic lesion
term:
id: HP:0000502
label: Abnormal conjunctiva morphology
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39335093
reference_title: 'Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Conjunctival melanoma (Co-M) is an aggressive, invasive eye and eyelid
cancer.
explanation: Supports the existence and aggressive nature of the conjunctival
surface lesion described by this phenotype.
- category: Ocular
name: Reduced Visual Acuity
frequency: FREQUENT
description: >-
Blurred or reduced vision occurs when the tumour involves the macula, causes
exudation or retinal detachment, or obstructs the visual axis. Up to about
30% of uveal melanomas are asymptomatic at diagnosis and are found on
routine examination, so acuity loss is common but not universal.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Reduced visual acuity
term:
id: HP:0007663
label: Reduced visual acuity
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and mortality
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Thirty-four patients (49%) presented with blurred vision."
explanation: Blurred vision (decreased visual acuity) was the commonest presenting
symptom, in 49% of an enucleation cohort - supporting the FREQUENT frequency band
assigned here.
- category: Ocular
name: Visual Field Defect
frequency: OCCASIONAL
description: >-
A field defect - classically described by patients as a "shadow" in the
field of vision - corresponding to the tumour location and the extent of
any associated exudative retinal detachment. Reported as the presenting
symptom in about a quarter of patients, and notable because an isolated
field shadow correlates with vasculogenic mimicry and worse prognosis.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Visual field defect
term:
id: HP:0001123
label: Visual field defect
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and mortality
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "18 (26%) with \na shadow in the visual field"
explanation: Quantifies a visual-field shadow as the presenting symptom in 26% of
an enucleation cohort, supporting the OCCASIONAL (5-29%) frequency band assigned
here.
- category: Ocular
name: Exudative Retinal Detachment
description: >-
Serous separation of the neurosensory retina caused by exudation from the
surface of a choroidal melanoma. It is a classic accompanying sign of
choroidal melanoma and a common route to vision loss.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Retinal detachment
term:
id: HP:0000541
label: Retinal detachment
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19667335
reference_title: Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033
consecutive eyes.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Clinical factors predictive of metastasis by multivariate analysis included\
\ increasing patient age, ciliary \nbody location, increasing tumor diameter,\
\ increasing tumor thickness, having a \nbrown tumor, and the presence of subretinal\
\ fluid, intraocular hemorrhage, or \nextraocular extension."
explanation: Subretinal fluid - the exudative retinal detachment described by this
phenotype - is documented as a recognised clinical feature of uveal melanoma in
an 8033-eye series, and is independently predictive of metastasis.
- category: Ocular
name: Photopsia
frequency: OCCASIONAL
description: >-
Perceived flashes of light arising from vitreoretinal traction and
detachment at the tumour-retina interface. Photopsia and floaters together
accounted for the presenting symptom in about 10% of one enucleation
cohort.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Photopsia
term:
id: HP:0030786
label: Photopsia
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and mortality
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "7 (10%) with \nphotopsia and/or floaters"
explanation: Quantifies photopsia (reported jointly with floaters) as the presenting
symptom in 10% of patients, supporting the OCCASIONAL frequency band.
- category: Ocular
name: Vitreous Floaters
frequency: OCCASIONAL
description: >-
Floaters from tumour-associated vitreous cells, dispersed pigment, or
vitreous haemorrhage. Reported jointly with photopsia in about 10% of
patients at presentation.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Vitreous floaters
term:
id: HP:0100832
label: Vitreous floaters
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and mortality
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "7 (10%) with \nphotopsia and/or floaters"
explanation: Quantifies floaters (reported jointly with photopsia) as the presenting
symptom in 10% of patients, supporting the OCCASIONAL frequency band.
- category: Ocular
name: Secondary Glaucoma
frequency: OCCASIONAL
description: >-
Raised intraocular pressure from anterior-segment tumour involvement, angle
infiltration, or neovascularisation. Most relevant to iris and ciliary-body
melanoma.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Glaucoma
term:
id: HP:0000501
label: Glaucoma
- category: Ocular
name: Ocular Pain
frequency: OCCASIONAL
description: >-
Pain from a large intraocular tumour, secondary glaucoma, or extrascleral
extension; a common indication for enucleation in a blind painful eye.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Ocular pain
term:
id: HP:0200026
label: Ocular pain
- category: Systemic
name: Hepatic Metastasis
frequency: FREQUENT
description: >-
Metastatic melanoma deposits in the liver. Roughly half of uveal melanoma
patients develop metastases and the liver is the dominant site in around
90%, typically detected on surveillance imaging rather than by symptoms or
by abnormal liver function tests, which cannot exclude hepatic metastasis.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Neoplasm of the liver
term:
id: HP:0002896
label: Neoplasm of the liver
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35227015
reference_title: Liver metastasis in uveal melanoma - treatment options and clinical
outcome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Despite \nimprovements in the treatment of primary tumours, approximately\
\ 50% of patients \nwith UM will develop metastases. In 90% of cases the liver\
\ is the first site of \nmetastasis"
explanation: Documents that about half of uveal melanoma patients metastasise and
that the liver is the first site in 90%, the hepatotropic pattern this phenotype
records.
histopathology:
- name: Melanocytic Neoplasm
finding_term:
preferred_term: Melanocytic Neoplasm
term:
id: NCIT:C7058
label: Melanocytic Neoplasm
frequency: OBLIGATE
diagnostic: true
description: >-
All ocular melanomas are melanocytic neoplasms. Diagnosis is supported by
immunohistochemistry for melanocytic markers (SOX10, S100, Melan-A/MART1,
HMB45); nuclear BAP1 immunostaining is additionally used in uveal melanoma
as a surrogate for BAP1 inactivation and hence metastatic risk.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41097064
reference_title: 'Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular
Biology.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Although sharing some \nhistopathological features with cutaneous melanoma,\
\ these tumours are \ncharacterized by distinct molecular and biological profiles\
\ with direct \nimplications for prognosis and treatment."
explanation: Confirms ocular melanomas are histopathologically melanocytic tumours
while being molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanoma.
- name: Epithelioid Cell Morphology
finding_term:
preferred_term: uveal epithelioid cell melanoma
term:
id: NCIT:C35780
label: Uveal Epithelioid Cell Melanoma
diagnostic: false
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
description: >-
Uveal melanomas are classified by cell type as spindle, mixed or
epithelioid. Epithelioid morphology - large cells with abundant cytoplasm,
prominent nucleoli and distinct cell borders - is strongly adverse, tracks
with BAP1 loss and monosomy 3, and is one of the classic histological
predictors of metastasis.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:12601021
reference_title: 'Monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma: correlation with clinical and histologic
predictors of survival.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Monosomy 3 was associated with epithelioid cells \n(chi(2) test, P <\
\ 0.001), PAS-positive loops (chi(2), P = 0.001), LBD \n(Mann-Whitney test, P\
\ = 0.002), CB involvement (chi(2) test, P = 0.008), and \nmetastasis-related\
\ death (log rank analysis, P = 0.0003)."
explanation: Names epithelioid cytomorphology directly and ties it statistically
to monosomy 3 and to metastasis-related death - exactly the association claimed
here.
- reference: PMID:12601021
reference_title: 'Monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma: correlation with clinical and histologic
predictors of survival.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The absence of monosomy 3 is predictable \nonly in patients who have\
\ small, spindle-cell tumors."
explanation: The converse observation - spindle-cell morphology marks the
favourable, disomy-3 end of the cell-type spectrum described here.
genetic:
- name: GNAQ
gene_term:
preferred_term: GNAQ
term:
id: hgnc:4390
label: GNAQ
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Activating somatic driver mutation (Q209, less often R183)
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
notes: >-
Initiating oncogenic driver of uveal melanoma, mutated in roughly 45% of
primary tumours and mutually exclusive with GNA11. Q209L/Q209P abolish
intrinsic GTPase activity, locking Gq alpha in its active GTP-bound state.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19078957
reference_title: Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue
naevi.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Here we report frequent somatic mutations in the heterotrimeric G \n\
protein alpha-subunit, GNAQ, in blue naevi (83%) and ocular melanoma of the\
\ uvea \n(46%)."
explanation: Reports the somatic GNAQ mutation frequency in uveal ocular melanoma.
- name: GNA11
gene_term:
preferred_term: GNA11
term:
id: hgnc:4379
label: GNA11
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Activating somatic driver mutation (Q209, less often R183)
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
notes: >-
Paralogue of GNAQ and functionally equivalent driver, mutated in about 32%
of primary uveal melanomas but 57% of uveal melanoma metastases - the
enrichment in metastases is the inverse of GNAQ and suggests GNA11-mutant
tumours are the more aggressive of the two.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21083380
reference_title: Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Mutations affecting Q209 in GNA11 were present in 7% of blue nevi, 32%\
\ of \nprimary uveal melanomas, and 57% of uveal melanoma metastases."
explanation: Gives the GNA11 mutation frequencies in primary and metastatic uveal
melanoma described in the notes.
- name: BAP1
gene_term:
preferred_term: BAP1
term:
id: hgnc:950
label: BAP1
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: GERMLINE_AND_SOMATIC
association: Tumour suppressor loss (biallelic, usually with monosomy 3)
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
notes: >-
The dominant prognostic gene in uveal melanoma. Somatic inactivation with
monosomy 3 defines the class-2, high-metastatic-risk phenotype. A minority
of patients carry a germline BAP1 pathogenic variant, constituting BAP1
tumour-predisposition syndrome (uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, cutaneous
melanoma, clear-cell renal carcinoma), which warrants genetic counselling
and cascade testing.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21051595
reference_title: Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "One tumor harbored a frameshift mutation that was germline in origin,\
\ thus \nrepresenting a susceptibility allele."
explanation: Documents both the somatic and the germline (susceptibility) origin
of BAP1 inactivation recorded here.
- name: SF3B1
gene_term:
preferred_term: SF3B1
term:
id: hgnc:10768
label: SF3B1
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Hotspot splicing-factor mutation (predominantly Arg625)
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
notes: >-
Occurs in roughly 20-25% of uveal melanomas, largely in disomy-3 tumours,
and marks an intermediate-risk class characterised by late relapse.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:23313955
reference_title: Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Thus, uveal melanoma is among a small group of \ncancers associated\
\ with SF3B1 mutations, and these mutations denote a distinct \nmolecular subset\
\ of uveal melanomas."
explanation: Establishes SF3B1 mutation as defining a distinct molecular subset
of uveal melanoma.
- name: EIF1AX
gene_term:
preferred_term: EIF1AX
term:
id: hgnc:3250
label: EIF1AX
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: N-terminal in-frame translation-initiation-factor mutation
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
notes: >-
Marks the lowest-risk uveal melanoma class; nearly always found in disomy-3
tumours and essentially mutually exclusive with BAP1 loss.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:23793026
reference_title: Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic mutations in EIF1AX
and SF3B1 in uveal melanoma with disomy 3.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Targeted resequencing showed that 24 of 31 tumors with disomy 3 (77%)\
\ had mutations in \neither EIF1AX (15; 48%) or SF3B1 (9; 29%)."
explanation: Quantifies EIF1AX mutation within the disomy-3, low-risk class.
- name: CYSLTR2
gene_term:
preferred_term: CYSLTR2
term:
id: hgnc:18274
label: CYSLTR2
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Activating receptor mutation (p.Leu129Gln) in GNAQ/GNA11-wild-type
tumours
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
notes: >-
Alternative initiating driver in roughly 2-4% of uveal melanomas, acting one
step upstream of Gq by constitutively activating the cysteinyl leukotriene
receptor 2 that couples to it.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:27089179
reference_title: Recurrent activating mutations of G-protein-coupled receptor CYSLTR2
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "We analyzed genomics data from 136 uveal \nmelanoma samples and found\
\ a recurrent mutation in CYSLTR2 (cysteinyl \nleukotriene receptor 2) encoding\
\ a p.Leu129Gln substitution in 4 of 9 samples \nthat lacked mutations in GNAQ,\
\ GNA11, and PLCB4 but in 0 of 127 samples that \nharbored mutations in these\
\ genes."
explanation: The discovery paper, giving the exact p.Leu129Gln substitution, the
restriction to GNAQ/GNA11/PLCB4-wild-type tumours, and the mutual exclusivity
asserted here.
- reference: PMID:27089179
reference_title: Recurrent activating mutations of G-protein-coupled receptor CYSLTR2
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "The Leu129Gln CysLT2R mutant protein \nconstitutively activates endogenous\
\ Gαq and is unresponsive to stimulation by \nleukotriene."
explanation: Establishes the activating, receptor-level mechanism acting upstream
of Gq that this entry describes.
- name: PLCB4
gene_term:
preferred_term: PLCB4
term:
id: hgnc:9059
label: PLCB4
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Activating mutation (p.Asp630Tyr) in GNAQ/GNA11-wild-type tumours
subtype: Uveal Melanoma
notes: >-
Rare (about 2.5%) initiating driver acting immediately downstream of Gq, at
the phospholipase C-beta step; mutually exclusive with GNAQ/GNA11 and
CYSLTR2 mutations.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26683228
reference_title: Deep sequencing of uveal melanoma identifies a recurrent mutation
in PLCB4.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "we found a recurrent mutation in PLCB4 (c.G1888T, p.D630Y, NM_000933),\
\ which was \nvalidated using Sanger sequencing."
explanation: The discovery paper, giving the exact p.Asp630Tyr hotspot asserted
here.
- reference: PMID:26683228
reference_title: Deep sequencing of uveal melanoma identifies a recurrent mutation
in PLCB4.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "PLCB4 p.D630Y mutations are mutually exclusive with \nmutations in GNA11\
\ and GNAQ, consistent with PLCB4 being the canonical \ndownstream target of\
\ the former gene products."
explanation: Establishes both the mutual exclusivity with GNAQ/GNA11 and PLCB4's
position immediately downstream of Gq, exactly as described here.
- name: BRAF
gene_term:
preferred_term: BRAF
term:
id: hgnc:1097
label: BRAF
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Activating somatic driver mutation (V600E) in conjunctival melanoma
subtype: Conjunctival Melanoma
notes: >-
Present in roughly a quarter to a third of conjunctival melanomas and
essentially absent from uveal melanoma. Associated with recurrence and
systemic dissemination, and the rationale for BRAF/MEK-directed therapy in
unresectable conjunctival disease.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35544941
reference_title: 'BRAF and NRAS prognostic values in conjunctival melanoma: analysis
and literature review.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "BRAF V600E \nmutation was observed in three biopsies (25%), similar\
\ to NRAS Q61X (25%). \nRecurrences occurred in all patients with positive BRAF\
\ or NRAS mutation"
explanation: Reports BRAF V600E frequency and its association with recurrence
in a conjunctival melanoma series.
- name: NRAS
gene_term:
preferred_term: NRAS
term:
id: hgnc:7989
label: NRAS
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Activating somatic driver mutation (Q61) in conjunctival melanoma
subtype: Conjunctival Melanoma
notes: >-
Present in a similar fraction of conjunctival melanomas to BRAF and, like
BRAF, associated with recurrence and systemic dissemination. NRAS-mutant
conjunctival melanoma may carry the greater metastatic risk of the two.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35544941
reference_title: 'BRAF and NRAS prognostic values in conjunctival melanoma: analysis
and literature review.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "BRAF and NRAS mutations may be risk factors for recurrence and \nshorter\
\ survival in conjunctival melanoma, which would make these patients \ncandidates\
\ for targeted therapies"
explanation: Supports NRAS as an adverse prognostic driver and a targeted-therapy
indication in conjunctival melanoma.
- name: NF1
gene_term:
preferred_term: NF1
term:
id: hgnc:7765
label: NF1
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Loss-of-function mutation in conjunctival melanoma (cutaneous-like
triple-wild-type arm)
subtype: Conjunctival Melanoma
notes: >-
Completes the cutaneous-melanoma-style BRAF/NRAS/NF1 driver trichotomy in
conjunctival melanoma. NF1 loss de-represses RAS and activates MAPK
signalling in BRAF/NRAS-wild-type tumours.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41097064
reference_title: 'Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular
Biology.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: commonly involving BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and TERT promoter mutations.
explanation: Names NF1 among the recurrent conjunctival melanoma drivers.
- name: TERT
gene_term:
preferred_term: TERT
term:
id: hgnc:11730
label: TERT
relationship_type: SOMATIC_DRIVER
variant_origin: SOMATIC
association: Promoter mutation (UV-signature) in conjunctival melanoma
subtype: Conjunctival Melanoma
notes: >-
TERT promoter mutations reactivate telomerase and are a UV-signature
hallmark shared with cutaneous melanoma; they are not a feature of uveal
melanoma.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34015548
reference_title: 'Conjunctival melanoma: New insights in tumour genetics and immunology,
leading to new therapeutic options.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "CoM is characterized by mutations that have also been identified in\
\ \ncutaneous melanoma, e.g. in BRAF, NRAS and TERT."
explanation: Names TERT among the cutaneous-like conjunctival melanoma mutations.
- reference: PMID:34071371
reference_title: Molecular Genetics of Conjunctival Melanoma and Prognostic Value
of TERT Promoter Mutation Analysis.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "TERT promoter mutations were most common (54%), but BRAF (46%), NRAS\
\ (21%), BAP1 \n(18%), PTEN (14%), c-KIT (7%), and SF3B1 (4%) mutations were\
\ also observed. No \nmutations in GNAQ, GNA11, and EIF1AX were found."
explanation: The single strongest statement of this entry's central divergence
thesis - conjunctival melanoma carries the cutaneous driver set and, critically,
NO mutations in GNAQ, GNA11 or EIF1AX, the genes that define the uveal arm.
inheritance:
- name: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome (germline BAP1)
description: >-
Most ocular melanoma is sporadic, but a minority of uveal melanoma arises in
BAP1 tumour predisposition syndrome, an autosomal dominant cancer
predisposition caused by a heterozygous germline BAP1 pathogenic variant.
Uveal melanoma is its commonest associated cancer, ahead of malignant
mesothelioma, cutaneous melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, and BAP1-related
uveal melanoma behaves as an aggressive class-2 tumour. Germline testing is
warranted for young-onset, bilateral or multifocal disease, or a personal or
family history of the syndrome's other tumours; carriers need annual dilated
eye examinations from age 11-18 years.
inheritance_term:
preferred_term: Autosomal dominant inheritance
term:
id: HP:0000006
label: Autosomal dominant inheritance
penetrance: INCOMPLETE
evidence:
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome (BAP1-TPDS) is \nassociated with an\
\ increased risk for a specific skin lesion, BAP1-inactivated \nmelanocytic tumors\
\ (BIMT; formerly called atypical Spitz tumors), and the \nfollowing cancers,\
\ in descending order of frequency: uveal (eye) melanoma (UM), \nmalignant mesothelioma\
\ (MMe), cutaneous melanoma (CM), renal cell carcinoma"
explanation: GeneReviews establishes uveal melanoma as the commonest cancer of
BAP1-TPDS and the syndrome's tumour spectrum.
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The diagnosis of BAP1-TPDS is established in a proband by \nidentification\
\ of a heterozygous germline pathogenic variant in BAP1 on \nmolecular genetic\
\ testing."
explanation: Confirms the heterozygous germline mechanism underlying the autosomal
dominant inheritance asserted here.
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The penetrance, natural history, \nlife-time cancer risk for carriers,\
\ and frequencies of BAP1-associated tumors \nare yet to be fully determined."
explanation: Supports recording penetrance as INCOMPLETE/undetermined rather than
asserting a figure.
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "GENETIC COUNSELING: BAP1-TPDS is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.\
\ Most \nindividuals diagnosed with BAP1-TPDS have an affected parent (an affected\
\ parent \nmay have BAP1-related tumors that differ from those of the proband).\
\ Some \nindividuals have BAP1-TPDS as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant."
explanation: GeneReviews Genetic Counseling section establishing the autosomal
dominant mode, the usual affected parent, and the de novo route asserted here.
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Each \nchild of an individual with BAP1-TPDS has a 50% chance of inheriting\
\ the BAP1 \npathogenic variant."
explanation: The 50% transmission risk that underpins the cascade-testing
recommendation described here.
environmental:
- name: Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure
presence: PRESENT
description: >-
Ultraviolet exposure is a credible aetiological factor for conjunctival
melanoma, which is an ocular-surface tumour carrying a UV mutational
signature and cutaneous-type drivers. Its role in posterior uveal melanoma
is far weaker and contested: the choroid is sun-shielded, uveal melanoma has
a low mutational burden without a dominant UV signature, and the R183
mutations that do show C-to-T transitions are a small minority of drivers.
This asymmetry should not be flattened into a single "UV causes ocular
melanoma" claim.
effect: RISK_FACTOR
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21083380
reference_title: Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "These alterations are characteristic mutational patterns induced by\
\ \nultraviolet light23,24 and are found with markedly increased frequency in\
\ \ncutaneous melanomas arising on sun-exposed skin."
explanation: Shows a UV-type signature at the minority R183 site in uveal melanoma
while the dominant Q209 site lacks it, supporting the partial and site-restricted
UV contribution described here.
- reference: PMID:41097064
reference_title: 'Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular
Biology.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Conversely, conjunctival and\neyelid melanoma exhibits greater molecular\
\ similarity to cutaneous melanoma,\ncommonly involving BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and\
\ TERT promoter mutations."
explanation: The cutaneous-like driver landscape of conjunctival melanoma is the
molecular correlate of its UV aetiology.
- name: Arc Welding Exposure
presence: PRESENT
description: >-
Occupational arc-welding exposure is a reported but not firmly established
risk association for uveal melanoma. It is included here because GeneReviews
lists avoidance of arc welding as an explicit primary-prevention measure for
germline BAP1 carriers, making it actionable in that population even though
causality in the general population remains uncertain.
effect: RISK_FACTOR
evidence:
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Prevention of primary manifestations: UM: avoid arc-welding."
explanation: GeneReviews Agents/Circumstances to Avoid guidance naming arc welding
as a uveal melanoma exposure to avoid in BAP1-TPDS.
- name: Oculodermal Melanocytosis (Nevus of Ota)
presence: PRESENT
description: >-
Congenital oculodermal melanocytosis is an established host risk factor for
uveal melanoma. It shares the same initiating lesion - nevus of Ota carries
somatic GNAQ mutations - providing a genetic link between the benign
melanocytic proliferation and the malignancy that occasionally arises in it.
Absolute risk remains low (of the order of 1 in 400).
effect: RISK_FACTOR
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19078957
reference_title: Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue
naevi.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Our findings identify GNAQ as a genetic link between nevus of Ota and
uveal melanoma and help explain why nevi of Ota are a risk factor for uveal
melanoma7. The risk is small, as only about 1 in 400 nevi of Ota progress to
uveal melanoma
explanation: Directly establishes nevus of Ota as a uveal melanoma risk factor
and quantifies the small absolute risk.
treatments:
- name: Plaque Brachytherapy
description: >-
Episcleral radioactive plaque (typically iodine-125 or ruthenium-106)
sutured over the tumour base. The globe-preserving first-line local therapy
for most small and medium uveal melanomas, achieving high local control.
Radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, optic neuropathy, cataract and
neovascular glaucoma are the principal late toxicities. Local control does
not reduce metastatic risk, because dissemination generally predates
treatment.
therapeutic_modality: RADIOTHERAPY
treatment_term:
preferred_term: episcleral plaque brachytherapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15195
label: Brachytherapy
target_mechanisms:
- target: Uveal Melanocyte Transformation and Intraocular Tumour Growth
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Ionising radiation delivered to the tumour base ablates the transformed
uveal melanocyte clone while preserving the globe.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29765944
reference_title: 'Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival
(SEER 1973-2013).'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "A corresponding increase \nwas observed in radiation as primary treatment\
\ selection (1.3% from 1973 to 1975 \nvs. 68.3% from 2012 to 2013)."
explanation: Documents radiotherapy displacing surgery as the primary local treatment
for uveal melanoma in the United States.
notes: >-
The SEER analysis also shows that this shift to globe-preserving radiation
did not improve five-year relative survival, which is the clearest available
demonstration that local therapy choice does not alter metastatic outcome.
- name: Proton Beam Radiotherapy
description: >-
Charged-particle external-beam radiotherapy delivering a sharply conformal
dose via the Bragg peak. Used for tumours unsuitable for plaque
brachytherapy - large tumours, juxtapapillary or macular locations - with
comparable local control.
therapeutic_modality: RADIOTHERAPY
treatment_term:
preferred_term: proton beam radiation therapy
term:
id: NCIT:C66897
label: Proton Beam Radiation Therapy
target_mechanisms:
- target: Uveal Melanocyte Transformation and Intraocular Tumour Growth
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Conformal charged-particle irradiation ablates the intraocular tumour with
a steep dose fall-off that spares adjacent critical ocular structures.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39456591
reference_title: Proton Therapy in Uveal Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Proton therapy offers significant \nadvantages for thicker uveal melanomas\
\ (over 8 mm) due to its unique physical \nproperties, including a rapid dose\
\ fall-off that protects critical structures \nlike the retina and optic nerve."
explanation: Documents the Bragg-peak dose fall-off and the specific indication
for thicker tumours and optic-nerve proximity described in this treatment.
- name: Enucleation
description: >-
Surgical removal of the globe. Reserved for very large tumours, extensive
ciliary-body or optic-nerve involvement, extrascleral extension, or a blind
painful eye. Excellent local control at the cost of the eye, and - as the
SEER-era data show - without a corresponding survival advantage over
globe-preserving radiotherapy.
therapeutic_modality: SURGERY
treatment_term:
preferred_term: eye enucleation
term:
id: NCIT:C198837
label: Eye Enucleation
target_mechanisms:
- target: Uveal Melanocyte Transformation and Intraocular Tumour Growth
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Removal of the globe physically eliminates the intraocular tumour.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29765944
reference_title: 'Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival
(SEER 1973-2013).'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "There was a decline in patients treated with surgery alone \n(94.2%\
\ from 1973 to 1975 vs. 24.7% from 2012 to 2013)."
explanation: Documents the historical role of enucleation and its decline as globe-preserving
options matured.
- name: Tebentafusp
description: >-
A gp100 x CD3 bispecific ImmTAC (immune-mobilising monoclonal T-cell
receptor against cancer): an affinity-enhanced soluble T-cell receptor that
binds the gp100 peptide-HLA-A*02:01 complex on melanoma cells, fused to an
anti-CD3 arm that recruits polyclonal T cells to kill them. The first and
only systemic agent with a randomised overall-survival benefit in metastatic
uveal melanoma, sustained at three years. Restricted to HLA-A*02:01-positive
patients (roughly half). Toxicity is dominated by early, self-limiting
cytokine-mediated events and by on-target attack on normal melanocytes -
rash in 83%, pyrexia in 76%, pruritus in 70% - but discontinuation for
toxicity is rare (2%).
therapeutic_modality: OTHER
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Pharmacotherapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15986
label: Pharmacotherapy
therapeutic_agent:
- preferred_term: tebentafusp
term:
id: NCIT:C94208
label: Tebentafusp
target_mechanisms:
- target: gp100-Directed T-Cell Redirection
treatment_effect: ACTIVATES
description: >-
Tebentafusp is the agent that instantiates this mechanism, bridging the
gp100-HLA-A*02:01 complex on tumour cells to CD3 on polyclonal T cells.
- target: Hepatic Metastatic Colonisation
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Redirected T-cell killing of gp100-positive metastatic deposits is the
route by which tebentafusp prolongs survival in liver-dominant disease.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34551229
reference_title: Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal
Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tebentafusp resulted in longer overall survival\
\ than \nthe control therapy among previously untreated patients with metastatic\
\ uveal \nmelanoma."
explanation: The pivotal randomised phase 3 conclusion establishing tebentafusp's
survival benefit.
- reference: PMID:37870955
reference_title: Three-Year Overall Survival with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal
Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade in the\
\ tebentafusp group were rash (83%), pyrexia (76%), pruritus \n(70%), and hypotension\
\ (38%)."
explanation: Documents the characteristic toxicity profile described here.
- name: Immune Checkpoint Blockade
description: >-
Anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab)
antibodies, alone or combined. Included here specifically to record a
negative result: despite transforming cutaneous melanoma, checkpoint
blockade has only marginal activity in metastatic uveal melanoma, because
the tumour's low mutational burden yields few neoantigens and the ocular
microenvironment is immune-privileged. It remains a fallback when
tebentafusp is unavailable or the patient is not HLA-A*02:01-positive, and
is a more rational option in conjunctival melanoma, whose immunobiology
resembles cutaneous melanoma.
therapeutic_modality: MONOCLONAL_ANTIBODY
treatment_term:
preferred_term: immunotherapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15262
label: Immunotherapy
therapeutic_agent:
- preferred_term: pembrolizumab
term:
id: NCIT:C106432
label: Pembrolizumab
- preferred_term: ipilimumab
term:
id: NCIT:C2654
label: Ipilimumab
- preferred_term: nivolumab
term:
id: NCIT:C68814
label: Nivolumab
target_mechanisms:
- target: Low Tumour Mutational Burden and Checkpoint Refractoriness
treatment_effect: MODULATES
description: >-
Checkpoint blockade acts on this node but is largely defeated by it:
relieving PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition cannot generate a response when few
neoantigens are presented in the first place.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34551229
reference_title: Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal
Melanoma.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned previously untreated\
\ HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with metastatic uveal melanoma in a 2:1 \nratio\
\ to receive tebentafusp (tebentafusp group) or the investigator's choice of\
\ \ntherapy with single-agent pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or dacarbazine (control\
\ \ngroup)"
explanation: Checkpoint inhibitors constituted the comparator arm that tebentafusp
outperformed, quantifying their limited benefit in metastatic uveal melanoma.
- reference: PMID:34015548
reference_title: 'Conjunctival melanoma: New insights in tumour genetics and immunology,
leading to new therapeutic options.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "While immunotherapy is currently sparsely effective in \nintraocular\
\ tumours such as UM, the similarities between CoM and cutaneous \nmelanoma\
\ (including in their immunological tumour micro environment) provide \nhope\
\ for the application of immunotherapy in CoM"
explanation: Directly supports both halves of this treatment's framing - checkpoint
blockade is sparsely effective in uveal disease but rational in conjunctival
melanoma.
- name: Wide Local Excision with Adjuvant Cryotherapy
description: >-
The standard local treatment for conjunctival melanoma: a "no-touch"
complete excision with wide margins and careful specimen orientation,
combined with cryotherapy to the conjunctival margins to eradicate residual
atypical intraepithelial melanocytes. Adjuvant topical mitomycin C or
interferon, plaque or proton radiotherapy, and - for orbital invasion -
exenteration are added according to margin status, multifocality and depth
of invasion. Recurrence remains common because the precursor lesion is a
field rather than a discrete mass.
therapeutic_modality: SURGERY
treatment_term:
preferred_term: excision with adjuvant margin cryosurgery
term:
id: NCIT:C15215
label: Cryosurgery
target_mechanisms:
- target: Conjunctival Melanocytic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Margin cryotherapy ablates residual atypical intraepithelial melanocytes,
addressing the precursor field that drives recurrence.
- target: UV-Associated BRAF/NRAS/NF1 Driver Activation
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Complete no-touch excision physically removes the invasive driver-mutant
clone.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39335093
reference_title: 'Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.'
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Due to its rarity, there is limited \nevidence for diagnosis and management;\
\ hence, there is no standardised treatment \nand not all cases are referred\
\ to a specialised ocular oncology centre."
explanation: Records the important caveat that conjunctival melanoma management
is not standardised and rests on limited evidence, which is why this treatment
is curated as PARTIAL.
- name: Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan
description: >-
Liver-directed regional chemotherapy: melphalan is infused into the hepatic
artery while hepatic venous effluent is captured and filtered
extracorporeally, delivering a hepatic dose far above what systemic
administration would tolerate. This is the therapeutic answer to the
hepatotropism modelled in this entry - the liver is the dominant and often
only metastatic site, so treating it regionally is disease-appropriate rather
than palliative. In a randomised study against best alternative care, all
efficacy endpoints favoured melphalan/hepatic delivery system, though the
trial converted to a single-arm design because of slow accrual and its
comparative analyses are therefore exploratory. Other liver-directed options
used in practice include resection or ablation of oligometastatic disease,
and chemo-, radio- or immunoembolization.
therapeutic_modality: DEVICE
treatment_term:
preferred_term: percutaneous hepatic perfusion
term:
id: NCIT:C148433
label: Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion
therapeutic_agent:
- preferred_term: melphalan
term:
id: CHEBI:28876
label: melphalan
target_mechanisms:
- target: Hepatic Metastatic Colonisation
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Regional high-dose chemotherapy is delivered to the hepatic niche in which
metastatic uveal melanoma colonises and grows.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:40192993
reference_title: An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System
Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System (Melphalan/HDS) is a drug/medical device\
\ combination used for \nliver-directed treatment of unresectable mUM patients."
explanation: Identifies the liver-directed modality curated here and its indication
in unresectable metastatic uveal melanoma.
- reference: PMID:40192993
reference_title: An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System
Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Exploratory analyses of \nefficacy endpoints showed numerical differences\
\ consistently favoring the \nMelphalan/HDS arm versus BAC (median overall survival:\
\ 18.5 vs. 14.5 months; \nmedian progression-free survival: 9.1 vs. 3.3 months;\
\ objective response rate: \n27.5% vs. 9.4%; and disease control rate: 80.0% vs.\
\ 46.9%)."
explanation: Gives the efficacy signal. Marked PARTIAL because the trial was
amended to a single-arm design and the authors themselves designate these
comparisons exploratory rather than confirmatory.
notes: >-
Only percutaneous hepatic perfusion is curated as a discrete treatment because
it is the liver-directed modality with randomised comparative data. Resection
or ablation of oligometastatic disease, chemoembolization, radioembolization
and immunoembolization are all used in practice but are supported here only by
the deep-research narrative, so they are described rather than asserted.
- name: BAP1 Carrier Ocular Surveillance and Genetic Counselling
description: >-
For individuals with a germline BAP1 pathogenic variant, GeneReviews
recommends annual dilated eye examination from age 11-18 years (or puberty)
with referral to an ocular oncologist for any pigmented lesion, alongside
cascade genetic testing of at-risk relatives once a familial variant is
known. Because BAP1-related uveal melanoma behaves like a class-2 /
monosomy-3 tumour, treatment of a detected tumour should follow the more
aggressive pathway rather than being de-escalated for early detection.
This is a surveillance and counselling intervention, not a mechanism-directed
therapy, so it deliberately carries no target_mechanisms link.
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Genetic Counseling
term:
id: NCIT:C15240
label: Genetic Counseling
evidence:
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "UM: \nannual dilated eye examinations beginning at age 11-18 years or\
\ at puberty with \nreferral to ocular oncologist for any pigmented lesions."
explanation: GeneReviews surveillance recommendation for uveal melanoma in BAP1
carriers, as described here.
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "UM treatment should be the same as the more \naggressive class 2 or monosomy\
\ 3 tumors because of the increased aggressiveness \nof BAP1-related UM."
explanation: GeneReviews management guidance that BAP1-related uveal melanoma be
treated as aggressive class-2 disease, exactly as stated here.
- reference: PMID:27748099
reference_title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Once a germline BAP1 pathogenic variant has been identified \nin an affected\
\ family member, predictive testing for at-risk family members and \nprenatal and\
\ preimplantation genetic testing are possible."
explanation: Supports the cascade-testing component of this intervention.
- name: Darovasertib
description: >-
An oral selective protein kinase C inhibitor targeting the PKC node
immediately downstream of mutant Gq/G11 - the most direct available
pharmacological attack on the initiating lesion of uveal melanoma. In
phase 2 neoadjuvant/adjuvant evaluation for localised disease
(NCT05907954), with endpoints including tumour shrinkage, conversion from
enucleation to radiation, and metastasis-free survival. Investigational;
not standard of care.
therapeutic_modality: SMALL_MOLECULE
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Pharmacotherapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15986
label: Pharmacotherapy
therapeutic_agent:
- preferred_term: darovasertib
term:
id: NCIT:C124796
label: Darovasertib
target_mechanisms:
- target: PLC-beta/PKC/MAPK Cascade Activation
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Selective PKC inhibition interrupts the cascade at the step immediately
downstream of the constitutively active Gq/G11 alpha subunit.
evidence:
- reference: clinicaltrials:NCT05907954
reference_title: (Neo)Adjuvant IDE196 (Darovasertib) in Patients With Localized
Ocular Melanoma
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Neoadjuvant/adjuvant IDE196 (darovasertib) in patients with primary uveal
melanoma
explanation: Names darovasertib specifically and its neoadjuvant/adjuvant use in
primary uveal melanoma, replacing an earlier generic pathway-inhibitor quote
that did not mention the drug.
clinical_trials:
- name: NCT03070392
phase: PHASE_III
status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
description: >-
IMCgp100-202: randomised open-label phase 3 trial of tebentafusp versus
investigator's choice (pembrolizumab, ipilimumab or dacarbazine) in
previously untreated HLA-A*02:01-positive metastatic uveal melanoma. The
trial that established the first overall-survival benefit in this disease.
Curated as PHASE_III on the strength of the NEJM report ("In this open-label,
phase 3 trial"); note that the ClinicalTrials.gov registered title still reads
"A Phase II Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study", a legacy of an earlier
protocol version.
target_phenotypes:
- preferred_term: Uveal melanoma
term:
id: HP:0007716
label: Uveal melanoma
- preferred_term: Neoplasm of the liver
term:
id: HP:0002896
label: Neoplasm of the liver
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34551229
reference_title: Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal
Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "(Funded by Immunocore; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03070392; EudraCT\
\ \nnumber, 2015-003153-18.)."
explanation: Identifies the NCT registration for the pivotal tebentafusp trial.
- reference: clinicaltrials:NCT03070392
reference_title: A Phase II Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study of the Safety
and Efficacy of IMCgp100 Compared With Investigator Choice in HLA-A*0201 Positive
Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Uveal Melanoma
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: To evaluate the overall survival of HLA-A\\*0201 positive adult patients
with previously untreated advanced UM receiving IMCgp100 compared to Investigator's
Choice of dacarbazine, ipilimumab, or pembrolizumab.
explanation: ClinicalTrials.gov record giving the trial's overall-survival primary
objective and the checkpoint-inhibitor comparator arm.
- name: NCT05907954
phase: PHASE_II
status: UNKNOWN
description: >-
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant darovasertib (IDE196), an oral PKC inhibitor, in
localised ocular melanoma. Endpoints include tumour shrinkage, conversion of
planned enucleation to globe-preserving radiation, reduction of radiation
dose to critical ocular structures, and long-term recurrence and metastasis
outcomes.
target_phenotypes:
- preferred_term: Uveal melanoma
term:
id: HP:0007716
label: Uveal melanoma
evidence:
- reference: clinicaltrials:NCT05907954
reference_title: (Neo)Adjuvant IDE196 (Darovasertib) in Patients With Localized
Ocular Melanoma
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Neoadjuvant/adjuvant IDE196 (darovasertib) in patients with primary uveal
melanoma
explanation: ClinicalTrials.gov record confirming the neoadjuvant/adjuvant
darovasertib trial in primary uveal melanoma.
notes: >-
Recruitment status is recorded as UNKNOWN rather than asserted: the cached
ClinicalTrials.gov summary does not expose a recruitment-status field, so no
status claim is made. No peer-reviewed results publication was available at
the time of curation.
diagnosis:
- name: Ophthalmic examination and ocular ultrasonography
description: >-
Uveal melanoma is usually diagnosed clinically by an ocular oncologist,
without biopsy, on dilated fundus examination (slit-lamp examination for
anterior tumours) combined with A- and B-scan ultrasonography. Ultrasound is
the workhorse: melanoma is characteristically low-reflective and acoustically
"hollow", which separates it from the high-reflectivity of choroidal
haemangioma and metastasis. Optical coherence tomography and fundus
autofluorescence add subretinal-fluid and lipofuscin detail that discriminate
a small melanoma from a naevus.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: ultrasound imaging
term:
id: NCIT:C17230
label: Ultrasound Imaging
results: >-
A dome-shaped or collar-button pigmented choroidal mass with low internal
reflectivity, acoustic hollowness and subretinal fluid supports uveal melanoma.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and mortality
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The tumor \neye had also been examined with slit lamp biomicroscopy,\
\ \nultrasonography, and fundus photography."
explanation: Documents the actual diagnostic work-up used in a uveal melanoma
cohort - slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ultrasonography and fundus photography - which
is precisely the modality set curated here.
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and mortality
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The tumor's api-\ncal thickness, largest basal diameter (LBD), and location\
\ in \nthe choroid had been noted."
explanation: Confirms that tumour thickness, largest basal diameter and choroidal
location are the measurements this examination yields - the parameters that drive
staging and the naevus-versus-melanoma distinction.
- name: Prognostic molecular and cytogenetic testing
description: >-
Fine-needle aspiration or resection tissue is used for prognostication rather
than for diagnosis. Chromosome 3, 8q and 6p status is assessed by FISH, SNP
array, MLPA or NGS, with sequencing of BAP1, SF3B1 and EIF1AX. This is what
assigns a tumour to the high-risk (monosomy 3 / BAP1-null / class 2),
intermediate (SF3B1) or low-risk (disomy 3 / EIF1AX / class 1) group that the
pathophysiology section models, and it sets hepatic surveillance intensity.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: genetic testing
term:
id: NCIT:C15709
label: Genetic Testing
results: >-
Monosomy 3 with BAP1 loss indicates high metastatic risk; disomy 3 with
EIF1AX mutation indicates low risk; SF3B1 mutation indicates intermediate risk
with characteristically late relapse.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:28810145
reference_title: Integrative Analysis Identifies Four Molecular and Clinical Subsets
in Uveal Melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Comprehensive multiplatform analysis of 80 uveal melanomas (UM) identifies\
\ four \nmolecularly distinct, clinically relevant subtypes: two associated with\
\ \npoor-prognosis monosomy 3 (M3) and two with better-prognosis disomy 3 (D3)."
explanation: Establishes the chromosome-3-anchored molecular classification that
this test assigns.
- reference: PMID:23793026
reference_title: Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic mutations in EIF1AX
and SF3B1 in uveal melanoma with disomy 3.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Mutations were infrequent (2/35; \n5.7%) in uveal melanomas with monosomy\
\ 3, which are associated with poor \nprognosis."
explanation: Supports the mutual near-exclusivity of the SF3B1/EIF1AX and monosomy-3
groups that makes this a discriminating prognostic test.
- name: Melanocytic immunohistochemistry and nuclear BAP1 staining
description: >-
On biopsy or enucleation specimens, melanocytic lineage is confirmed with
SOX10, S100, Melan-A/MART1 and HMB45. Loss of nuclear BAP1 immunostaining is
used as an inexpensive surrogate for BAP1 inactivation and therefore for
high metastatic risk, and it is also the key discriminator against
non-melanocytic ocular-surface lesions such as ocular surface squamous
neoplasia.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: immunohistochemical test
term:
id: NCIT:C51944
label: Immunohistochemical Test
results: >-
Positive melanocytic markers confirm melanoma; loss of nuclear BAP1 staining
indicates a BAP1-inactivated, high-risk tumour.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21051595
reference_title: Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas.
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Inactivating somatic mutations were identified in the gene encoding \
BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) on chromosome 3p21.1 in 26 of 31 (84%) \
metastasizing tumors"
explanation: Establishes BAP1 inactivation as the marker that nuclear BAP1
immunostaining is used to detect; the immunohistochemical surrogate itself is
described rather than separately evidenced, hence PARTIAL.
- name: Hepatic metastatic surveillance imaging
description: >-
Because roughly half of uveal melanoma patients metastasise, almost always to
the liver, and because local control does not change that risk, risk-adapted
hepatic imaging (ultrasound, CT or MRI) is performed indefinitely after
treatment, with interval set by the molecular risk group. A clinically
important negative: normal liver function tests do NOT exclude hepatic
metastasis and must not be used as a substitute for imaging.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: diagnostic imaging
term:
id: NCIT:C16502
label: Diagnostic Imaging Testing
results: >-
Detection of hepatic lesions on surveillance imaging establishes metastatic
disease, typically before symptoms and often with normal liver chemistry.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37628989
reference_title: Genetic and Epigenetic Features of Uveal Melanoma-An Overview and
Clinical Implications.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "however, the absence of rising LFT values cannot lead to the exclusion\
\ of liver metastases."
explanation: Sources the clinically important negative recorded here - normal liver
function tests cannot rule out hepatic metastasis.
- reference: PMID:34775516
reference_title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and mortality
in uveal melanoma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The metastasis screen-\ning of the liver was then repeated by ultrasonography\
\ or by \nCT semi-annually for a 5-year period after diagnosis."
explanation: Documents a real hepatic surveillance protocol - repeat liver
ultrasonography or CT at six-monthly intervals - matching the risk-adapted
imaging described here.
differential_diagnoses:
- name: Choroidal Naevus
description: >-
A benign choroidal melanocytic lesion, orders of magnitude commoner than
choroidal melanoma and the single most frequent lesion to be distinguished
from it. Naevi and melanomas share the same GNAQ/GNA11 initiating mutation,
so the distinction is not molecular but clinical and morphological.
distinguishing_features:
- Flat or minimally elevated (under about 2 mm thickness) and under about 5 mm
in basal diameter, whereas melanoma is thicker and larger
- No subretinal fluid, orange lipofuscin pigment, or symptoms; each of these
features shifts the diagnosis toward melanoma
- Stable on serial imaging - documented growth is the decisive discriminator
- Overlying drusen or a surrounding halo favour a naevus; ultrasonographic
acoustic hollowness favours melanoma
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19078957
reference_title: Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue
naevi.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: In our experiments, GNAQ behaves similar to the oncogenes, BRAF and NRAS,
in that its mutation is insufficient for full progression to melanoma.
explanation: Explains why the naevus/melanoma distinction cannot be made on the
shared GNAQ driver alone and must rest on clinical and morphological features.
notes: >-
Deliberately left with NO bound disease_term. MONDO has no distinct
"choroidal naevus" class at the time of curation, and the nearest ocular
melanocytic-naevus concept - nevus of Ota / oculodermal melanocytosis
(MONDO:0016984) - is a periorbital-dermal and scleral melanocytosis, not a
choroidal naevus; binding it here would be semantically wrong. Per the
dismech review convention, no term is preferable to a misleading one. A
dedicated choroidal-naevus MONDO term is a candidate new-term request.
Nevus of Ota is separately (and correctly) curated in this entry as a uveal
melanoma risk factor under environmental.
- name: Choroidal Haemangioma
description: >-
A benign vascular choroidal tumour that can mimic an amelanotic choroidal
melanoma, presenting with an elevated subretinal mass and exudative
detachment.
distinguishing_features:
- Orange-red colour rather than pigmented
- High internal reflectivity on A-scan ultrasonography, whereas melanoma is
characteristically low-reflective and acoustically hollow
- Early intense hyperfluorescence with late washout on indocyanine-green
angiography
- Diffuse (rather than circumscribed) choroidal haemangioma suggests
Sturge-Weber syndrome
disease_term:
preferred_term: hemangioma of choroid
term:
id: MONDO:0021542
label: hemangioma of choroid
- name: Choroidal Metastasis
description: >-
Metastatic carcinoma to the choroid is actually the commonest intraocular
malignancy overall - commoner than primary uveal melanoma - most often from
breast or lung primaries, and must be excluded before treating a presumed
primary melanoma.
distinguishing_features:
- Creamy-yellow and plateau-shaped rather than pigmented and dome or
collar-button shaped
- Frequently multifocal and bilateral, whereas uveal melanoma is almost always
unilateral and unifocal
- Usually accompanied by a known extraocular primary tumour and systemic
disease
- High internal reflectivity on ultrasonography
disease_term:
preferred_term: metastatic malignant neoplasm in the eye
term:
id: MONDO:0044913
label: metastatic malignant neoplasm in the eye
- name: Retinoblastoma
description: >-
The commonest primary intraocular malignancy of childhood, and the key
age-based differential for an intraocular mass. Arises from the retina via
biallelic RB1 inactivation, not from melanocytes.
distinguishing_features:
- Presents in early childhood, about 95% before age 5, versus adult onset for
uveal melanoma
- Arises in the retina and is non-pigmented
- Characteristic intralesional calcification on ultrasound or CT, which uveal
melanoma does not show
- Leukocoria or strabismus as presenting signs
- Definitive on RB1 genetics and on histology (Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes)
disease_term:
preferred_term: retinoblastoma
term:
id: MONDO:0008380
label: retinoblastoma
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39200222
reference_title: 'Uveal Melanoma: Comprehensive Review of Its Pathophysiology,
Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Perspectives.'
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults.
explanation: The qualifier "in adults" is the axis on which retinoblastoma, the
commonest paediatric intraocular malignancy, is separated from uveal melanoma.
- name: Conjunctival Naevus
description: >-
A benign conjunctival melanocytic lesion, and the principal differential for
a pigmented conjunctival spot. Common, usually juxtalimbal, and typically
present since childhood or adolescence.
distinguishing_features:
- Characteristically contains clear intralesional cysts
- Mobile over the underlying sclera, whereas melanoma may be fixed
- Stable in size and pigmentation over years; new adult-onset pigmentation or
documented growth favours melanoma
- Confined to the bulbar conjunctiva; palpebral or forniceal involvement
favours melanoma and warrants excisional biopsy
- Absence of feeder vessels and of surrounding flat diffuse pigmentation
disease_term:
preferred_term: conjunctival nevus
term:
id: MONDO:0006172
label: conjunctival nevus
- name: Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia
description: >-
The main non-melanocytic differential for a limbal ocular-surface mass,
spanning conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia to invasive squamous cell
carcinoma. Shares the UV-exposed limbal niche and the risk-factor profile
(UV, fair skin, older age, immunosuppression, HPV) with conjunctival
melanoma.
distinguishing_features:
- Gelatinous, papilliform or leukoplakic pink-to-white appearance rather than
a pigmented lesion
- Prominent feeder vessels at the limbus
- Amelanotic conjunctival melanoma can look very similar and is a recognised
source of misdiagnosis, so clinical appearance alone is not sufficient
- Histology with melanocytic immunohistochemistry (SOX10, Melan-A, HMB45) is
definitive
disease_term:
preferred_term: ocular surface squamous neoplasia
term:
id: MONDO:0971056
label: ocular surface squamous neoplasia
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39335093
reference_title: 'Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.'
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Co-M is often \nmisdiagnosed or overlooked, leading to vision loss either\
\ from the destructive \neffects of the tumour or side effects of therapy"
explanation: Confirms that conjunctival melanoma is frequently misdiagnosed, which
is why the ocular-surface differential is clinically important.
classifications:
icdo_morphology:
classification_value: Melanoma
harrisons_chapter:
- classification_value: ONCOLOGY_HEMATOLOGY
notes: >-
Scope and relationship to sibling entries. This entry is the umbrella
(root-with-subtypes) node for ocular melanoma. The uveal arm is curated in
greater depth in the separate Uveal_Melanoma entry (MONDO:0006486), which
declares this entry as a parent; the material here is deliberately organised
around what the umbrella adds - the uveal-versus-conjunctival contrast, the
driver-to-prognosis chain, the hepatotropic dissemination mechanism, and the
checkpoint-refractory/ImmTAC therapeutic logic.
Module conformance decisions. Conformance is declared against
sustaining_proliferative_signaling (all three module nodes: the GNAQ/GNA11
lesion as the oncogenic growth-signal lesion, the PLC-beta/PKC/MAPK cascade as
constitutive mitogenic pathway activation, and uveal melanocyte transformation
as growth-factor-independent proliferation) and against
invasion_and_metastasis at its Circulatory Survival and Extravasation and
Metastatic Colonization nodes, which is where uveal melanoma's lymphatic-free
haematogenous route and hepatic-niche colonisation genuinely sit.
Conformance to immune_checkpoint_blockade is deliberately NOT declared. That
module models adaptive immune resistance in which an anti-tumour T-cell
response drives PD-L1 upregulation and exhaustion - a mechanism whose
therapeutic corollary is that checkpoint inhibition works. Uveal melanoma is
the opposite case: the tumour mutational burden is low, few neoantigens are
presented, checkpoint blockade is largely ineffective, and the therapeutic
solution (tebentafusp) works precisely by bypassing neoantigen-dependent
recognition. Declaring that conformance would assert the wrong mechanism.
Conformance to genome_instability_mutation is likewise withheld: uveal
melanoma is a low-mutational-burden cancer whose progression is driven by a
small number of specific chromosomal events (monosomy 3, 8q gain) rather than
by a mutator phenotype.
Curation caveats. HPO has no dedicated conjunctival melanoma class, so the
conjunctival presenting lesion is coded to the generic HP:0000502 and disease
identity is carried by the MONDO:0002096 subtype binding. MONDO likewise has
no distinct choroidal naevus class, so the choroidal-naevus differential is
deliberately left with NO bound disease_term - the nearest concept, nevus of
Ota (MONDO:0016984), is a periorbital-dermal and scleral melanocytosis rather
than a choroidal naevus, and binding it would be misleading. A dedicated
choroidal-naevus MONDO term is a reasonable new-term request. Nevus of Ota is
separately and correctly curated here as a uveal melanoma risk factor under
environmental. Cytogenetic events
(monosomy 3, 8q gain, 6p gain) and the DecisionDx-UM gene-expression-profile
classes are described in prose but are not curated as structured genetic items
because they are chromosomal and transcriptional, not gene-level, assertions.
references:
- reference: PMID:41097064
title: 'Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular Biology.'
found_in:
- Ocular_Melanoma-deep-research-falcon.md
- reference: PMID:39335093
title: 'Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.'
found_in:
- Ocular_Melanoma-deep-research-falcon.md
- reference: PMID:39055896
title: Biological characteristics and clinical management of uveal and conjunctival
melanoma.
found_in:
- Ocular_Melanoma-deep-research-falcon.md
- reference: PMID:39200222
title: 'Uveal Melanoma: Comprehensive Review of Its Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment,
and Future Perspectives.'
found_in:
- Ocular_Melanoma-deep-research-falcon.md
- reference: PMID:38920653
title: Recent Advances in Molecular and Genetic Research on Uveal Melanoma.
found_in:
- Ocular_Melanoma-deep-research-falcon.md
- reference: PMID:37628989
title: Genetic and Epigenetic Features of Uveal Melanoma-An Overview and Clinical
Implications.
found_in:
- Ocular_Melanoma-deep-research-falcon.md
- reference: PMID:37870955
title: Three-Year Overall Survival with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.
found_in:
- Ocular_Melanoma-deep-research-falcon.md
- reference: PMID:34775516
title: Vasculogenic mimicry correlates to presenting symptoms and mortality in uveal
melanoma.
- reference: PMID:19667335
title: Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033 consecutive
eyes.
- reference: PMID:39456591
title: Proton Therapy in Uveal Melanoma.
- reference: PMID:27748099
title: BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.
tags:
- GeneReviews
Scope and category. “Ocular melanoma” is an umbrella term, not one homogeneous disease. It principally includes uveal melanoma (UM)—melanoma of the choroid, ciliary body, or iris—and conjunctival melanoma (Co-M), an ocular-surface mucosal melanoma with different embryology, drivers, metastatic routes, and treatment. This report therefore treats them separately, emphasizing UM because it accounts for approximately 80% of ocular melanomas and has the larger evidence base. The evidence is aggregated disease-level literature and registry/trial data, not individual electronic-health-record data. (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
UM is the commonest primary intraocular malignancy in adults, with incidence around 5–6 per million/year in the United States and Europe and marked enrichment in fair-skinned populations. Approximately 90% arise in the choroid. GNAQ/GNA11-pathway activation initiates most tumors; later BAP1, SF3B1, or EIF1AX alterations and chromosome 3/8q status largely determine metastatic risk. Local radiotherapy or surgery controls the ocular tumor, but roughly half of patients eventually develop hematogenous metastases, usually in the liver. Tebentafusp is the first systemic therapy to produce a randomized overall-survival benefit, but it applies only to HLA-A*02:01-positive unresectable/metastatic UM. Co-M is much rarer—approximately 0.46 cases per million/year—but its incidence is increasing; it often arises from conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesions and has BRAF, NRAS, NF1, UV-related, and PD-L1 biology closer to cutaneous melanoma. (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3, butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2, hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3)
A concise structured mapping is provided below.
| Domain | Uveal melanoma key entity/fact | Conjunctival melanoma contrast | Suggested ontology term(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disease entity | Uveal melanoma is the main intraocular melanoma in adults; MONDO confirmed as MONDO:0006486. Often treated as the dominant subtype within “ocular melanoma,” but biologically distinct from conjunctival melanoma (OpenTargets Search: uveal melanoma,ocular melanoma,conjunctival melanoma, lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 1-3) | Conjunctival melanoma is an ocular-surface/mucosal melanoma, not a uveal tumor; review evidence emphasizes it is embryologically, biologically, and clinically distinct from UM (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | MONDO:0006486 uveal melanoma; conjunctival melanoma: suggest MONDO mapping needed (do not infer exact ID) |
| Synonym/scope | “Uveal melanoma (UM)”; arises from melanocytes in iris, ciliary body, or choroid (lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 1-3, kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5) | “Conjunctival melanoma (Co-M)”; ocular surface melanoma, often grouped historically with ocular melanoma but should be separated in KB design (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | MeSH/ICD/Orphanet exact cross-maps: suggest curator lookup |
| Anatomy | Most UM arises from choroid (~90%), then ciliary body (~7%), iris (~2–3%) (kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2) | Usually bulbar conjunctiva near limbus, but can involve any conjunctival region and adjacent tissues (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | UBERON: uvea; choroid; ciliary body; iris; conjunctiva; bulbar conjunctiva; limbus (exact IDs should be curated if required) |
| Epidemiology | Incidence ~5–6 per million/year in US/Europe; much higher in fair-skinned/Caucasian populations (pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2, lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 3-7) | Incidence ~0.46 per 1,000,000 persons/year; increasing, especially in older adults (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | MONDO:0006486; phenotype annotation may use “adult onset” HPO term |
| Cell of origin | Malignancy of uveal melanocytes; early oncogenic events arise in melanocytes of choroid/ciliary body/iris (lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 1-3, kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5) | Malignancy of conjunctival epithelial/basal melanocytes; often from C-MIN/PAM with atypia (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | CL: melanocyte; conjunctival epithelial cell; immune infiltrates incl. macrophage, T cell (exact CL IDs to curate) |
| Initiating gene driver | GNA11 activating mutation, ~55% in one 2024 summary; mutually exclusive with GNAQ; early/initiating driver (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3) | GNA11 is not a canonical frequent Co-M driver in recent reviews (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HGNC:GNA11; GO suggestions: G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway; MAPK cascade |
| Initiating gene driver | GNAQ activating mutation, ~40% in one 2024 summary; with GNA11 accounts for ~85–94% of UM across stages; early driver, not strongly prognostic by itself (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3) | Not a typical major Co-M driver in current review summaries (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HGNC:GNAQ; GO: MAPK cascade; phospholipase C-activating GPCR signaling pathway |
| Initiating gene driver | CYSLTR2 mutation in ~2–4% of UM, usually in GNAQ/GNA11-wild-type tumors; initiating event (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3) | Not emphasized as a common Co-M driver in recent clinical reviews (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HGNC:CYSLTR2; GO: leukotriene signaling / GPCR signaling (exact process term to curate) |
| Initiating gene driver | PLCB4 mutation ~2.5% of UM; activating PLC/PKC/MAPK signaling (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3) | Not a defining frequent Co-M driver in 2024 review evidence (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HGNC:PLCB4; GO: phosphatidylinositol-mediated signaling; protein kinase C signaling |
| Prognostic gene | BAP1 loss/inactivating mutation: associated with aggressive disease, monosomy 3, high metastatic risk; ~38% primary and ~84% metastatic in one 2024 review summary (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 3-7) | BAP1 is not the hallmark frequent Co-M driver pattern emphasized in current review summaries (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HGNC:BAP1; GO: DNA repair; chromatin organization; deubiquitination |
| Prognostic gene | SF3B1 mutation ~25%; intermediate/later metastasis risk and distinct molecular subgroup (lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 3-7, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3) | Not a headline common Co-M mutation in recent clinical review summaries (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HGNC:SF3B1; GO: mRNA splicing via spliceosome |
| Prognostic gene | EIF1AX mutation ~13%; associated with favorable prognosis and younger patients (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 3-7) | Not a major defining Co-M driver in recent clinical review summaries (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HGNC:EIF1AX; GO: translation initiation |
| Chromosomal alteration | Monosomy 3 strongly linked to poor prognosis/BAP1-mutant disease (lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 3-7, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2) | Copy-number variation occurs in Co-M, but chromosome-3-centric prognostic framework is mainly UM-focused (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | Cytogenetic annotation: monosomy 3 (formal ontology/NCIt code should be curated) |
| Chromosomal alteration | 8q gain/amplification linked to metastatic risk; often with monosomy 3 in poor-risk classes (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2) | CNVs also occur in Co-M, but specific UM class system is not directly transferable (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | Cytogenetic annotation: 8q gain (exact code to curate) |
| Chromosomal alteration | 6p gain seen in better-risk UM classes; 6q loss may accompany SF3B1-related structural patterns (lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 3-7, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3) | No analogous standard clinical class scheme highlighted for Co-M (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | Cytogenetic annotation: 6p gain / 6q loss (exact code to curate) |
| Molecular class | DecisionDx-UM/GEP classes used for prognostic stratification: class 1A, 1B, 2 with increasing 5-year metastatic risk; transcriptomic classes 1–4/A–D also used (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3) | No comparably established routine prognostic GEP system highlighted in the 2024 Co-M review (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | NCIT/diagnostic concept: gene expression profiling (exact NCIt term to curate) |
| Core pathway | Gαq/Gα11 signaling activates PKC, MAPK/ERK, PI3K/mTOR networks driving proliferation and survival (kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3) | Co-M more often resembles cutaneous melanoma genetics, especially UV-related BRAF/NRAS/NF1 alterations (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | GO: MAPK cascade; PI3K signaling; TOR signaling; cell proliferation |
| Immune microenvironment | UM is immune-privileged/immune-cold; lymphocytic inflammatory phenotype, macrophages, HLA class I/II upregulation and NF-κB activity correlate with poor prognosis (lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 1-3, kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5) | Co-M transcriptomic studies show high PD-L1 expression and immune-enriched subtypes (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | CL: T cell, CD8-positive T cell, macrophage, endothelial cell; GO: immune response, antigen processing/presentation, NF-kappaB signaling |
| Multi-omics/single-cell | scRNA-seq of 37,660 malignant cells from 17 UM tumors revealed heterogeneous malignant programs and 2 intratumoral subtypes with prognostic/immune differences (karlsson2024patientderivedxenograftsand pages 1-2) | Equivalent single-cell evidence base for Co-M is less mature in the retrieved set (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | NCIT/assay: single-cell RNA sequencing (exact term to curate) |
| Metastatic tropism | About half of UM patients ultimately metastasize; liver is dominant metastatic site (~89% or more than 90% across sources) (pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2, hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3) | Co-M more often spreads first to regional lymph nodes (~25%), but can also involve liver, lungs, brain (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HPO suggestions: Hepatic metastasis; Lymph node metastasis; Pulmonary metastasis; Brain metastasis (exact IDs to curate) |
| Clinical phenotype | Up to ~30% asymptomatic; symptomatic disease can cause visual impairment/vision loss, exudation, retinal detachment; iris melanoma may present with heterochromia and corectopia (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 1-2, kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3) | Visible pigmented or amelanotic conjunctival lesion; may cause sight loss, eye loss, local invasion, disfigurement (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HPO suggestions: decreased visual acuity; retinal detachment; heterochromia iridis; corectopia; conjunctival pigmentation; amelanotic melanoma (exact IDs to curate) |
| Histopathology/prognostic phenotype | Epithelioid or mixed cell type, extra-scleral extension, larger tumor size and chromosome 3/8q abnormalities increase metastatic risk (pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2) | High postoperative recurrence (33–45%) and lack of standardized therapy are emphasized (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HPO suggestions: extrascleral extension; recurrent neoplasm; epithelioid morphology (exact mappings to curate) |
| Diagnostics | Ophthalmic exam plus ocular imaging and tissue/molecular prognostication; liquid biopsy, ctDNA, extracellular vesicles and AI-assisted methods are active research areas (kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2) | Histopathology is critical; clinical misdiagnosis/late diagnosis remains common; molecular pathology increasingly relevant (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | NCIT/assay suggestions: ultrasonography; fundus photography; biopsy; gene expression profiling; liquid biopsy |
| Prognosis | Historical metastatic median OS about 1 year; 5-year survival overall often 50–70%; metastatic prognosis poor (pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2, hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3) | ~27% 5-year disease-specific mortality and recurrence 33–45% in review summary (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | HPO suggestions: reduced life expectancy; recurrent neoplasm; metastasis |
| Local treatment | Plaque brachytherapy and enucleation remain standard local therapies; globe-preserving radiotherapy common (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2) | Surgical excision ± cryotherapy, topical chemotherapy, brachytherapy, proton/photon radiotherapy; exenteration for advanced invasion (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | NCIT suggestions: Plaque Brachytherapy; Enucleation; Cryosurgery; Topical Chemotherapy; Proton Radiation Therapy; Orbital Exenteration |
| Systemic/metastatic treatment | Tebentafusp for HLA-A*02:01-positive unresectable/metastatic UM improved OS: median 21.6 vs 16.9 months; 3-year OS 27% vs 18% (phase 3) (hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3) | No standard targeted/immunotherapy established; anti-BRAF/anti-MEK/anti-PD(L)1 evidence remains limited and often case-series level (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | NCIT suggestions: Tebentafusp; Pembrolizumab; Ipilimumab; Dacarbazine |
| Tebentafusp toxicity | Common AEs: rash 83%, pyrexia 76%, pruritus 70%, hypotension 38%; discontinuation low (2%) in phase 3 follow-up (hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3) | Not directly applicable; Co-M systemic therapy toxicities depend on regimen used | HPO/AE suggestions: rash; pyrexia; pruritus; hypotension; cytokine release syndrome (exact IDs to curate) |
| Liver-directed treatment | Liver-directed therapy remains central for metastatic UM because liver is the dominant metastatic site (pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2, hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3) | Co-M metastasis pattern is less liver-dominant than UM and more nodal at presentation of spread (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | NCIT suggestions: Hepatic Perfusion; Radiofrequency Ablation; Embolization; Hepatic-directed Therapy (exact preferred term to curate) |
| Current trial example | Darovasertib (IDE196/LXS196) neoadjuvant/adjuvant phase 2 for localized UM; PKC inhibitor; outcomes include eye salvage, dose reduction to critical structures, recurrence and metastasis follow-up (NCT05907954) (NCT05907954 chunk 1) | No matched conjunctival trial in retrieved evidence | NCIT suggestions: Darovasertib; Protein Kinase C Inhibitor Therapy |
| Current trial example | Belzupacap sarotalocan (AU-011 / bel-sar) phase 3 randomized sham-controlled trial for indeterminate lesions/small choroidal melanoma using suprachoroidal administration plus laser photoactivation (NCT06007690) (NCT06007690 chunk 1) | Not a conjunctival melanoma protocol | NCIT suggestions: Belzupacap sarotalocan; Suprachoroidal Injection; Laser Therapy |
| Current trial example | Adjuvant melatonin phase 3 prevention-oriented trial in high-risk primary UM with 5-year metastasis endpoint (NCT05502900) (NCT05502900 chunk 1) | No analogous Co-M adjuvant prevention trial in retrieved set | NCIT suggestions: Melatonin; Adjuvant Therapy |
| Model systems | PDX, zebrafish xenografts, and single-cell functional studies are active UM platforms; zebrafish UM PDX reproduced disseminating UM and enabled drug testing with navitoclax/everolimus (yin2023zebrafishpatientderivedxenograft pages 1-2, karlsson2024patientderivedxenograftsand pages 1-2) | No equally developed Co-M preclinical evidence highlighted in retrieved set | NCIT/model suggestions: Patient-Derived Xenograft Model; Zebrafish Model; Single-Cell Sequencing |
| Evidence note | UM ontology, molecular classes, and treatment evidence are substantially more mature than for Co-M in the retrieved 2023–2024 literature (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3, butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2, hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3) | Co-M should be represented as a distinct KB entity with separate genetics, anatomy, and management pathways (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2) | Curation note: exact IDs for uncertain ontology mappings should be validated before production use |
Table: Compact knowledge-base mapping table contrasting uveal melanoma with conjunctival melanoma across disease identity, genes, anatomy, phenotypes, mechanisms, and treatments. It highlights confirmed and suggested ontology mappings while avoiding invention of uncertain IDs.
UM is usually an acquired clonal cancer. Early activating mutations in GNAQ, GNA11, CYSLTR2, or PLCB4 initiate melanocytic proliferation; subsequent chromosomal and tumor-suppressor/splicing alterations govern malignant progression. Germline BAP1 pathogenic variants cause autosomal-dominant BAP1 tumor-predisposition syndrome, which increases risks of UM, cutaneous melanoma, mesothelioma, and clear-cell renal carcinoma. Rare inherited MBD4 and other DNA-repair predispositions are also reported, but most UM is not inherited. (OpenTargets Search: uveal melanoma,ocular melanoma,conjunctival melanoma, kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3)
Established host associations include older age, fair skin, light iris color, poor tanning/sunburn sensitivity, iris or choroidal nevus, oculodermal melanocytosis/nevus of Ota, dysplastic-nevus phenotype, and family history of melanoma. Occupational associations with welding or irritant exposure have been reported, but causality is less certain. Direct solar causation remains debated and is substantially weaker than in cutaneous melanoma because most UM arises in the sun-shielded choroid and has low mutational burden. (sorrentino2024geneticfeaturesof pages 1-2, kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
For Co-M, fair skin, older age, UV exposure/signatures, and precursor conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesion are important. Approximately 70% arise from C-MIN/PAM with atypia; the remainder arise from nevi or de novo. BRAF occurs in approximately 30% and NRAS in approximately 14–25%; NRAS-mutant disease may have greater metastatic risk. (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2)
No genetic variant, diet, medication, or lifestyle intervention is proven to prevent UM. UV-protective eyewear is sensible for general ocular health and may be more biologically relevant to conjunctival/iris disease, but evidence that it prevents posterior UM is insufficient. A plausible gene–environment distinction is that UV exposure contributes more strongly to Co-M’s BRAF/NRAS/NF1-like landscape, whereas inherited pigmentation phenotype and rare BAP1 susceptibility interact with largely non-UV initiating events in UM. Smoking, alcohol, infection, exercise, and diet are not established causal or protective determinants.
UM is often insidious and unilateral. Up to approximately 30% of patients are asymptomatic and diagnosed on routine ophthalmic examination. Symptoms depend on size and location: blurred or reduced vision, photopsias, floaters, visual-field loss, metamorphopsia, pain, and occasionally a visible iris lesion. Exudation, macular involvement, vitreous hemorrhage, or retinal detachment can produce severe or progressive vision loss. Iris tumors may present 10–20 years earlier than posterior tumors and cause heterochromia, corectopia, secondary glaucoma, or a growing pigmented lesion. (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 1-2, kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3)
Suggested HPO annotations include decreased visual acuity, visual-field defect, photopsia, vitreous floaters, retinal detachment, ocular pain, heterochromia iridis, corectopia, secondary glaucoma, and unilateral ocular abnormality. Frequencies beyond the approximately 30% asymptomatic estimate vary substantially by tumor site and referral population.
Co-M usually presents as a growing amelanotic, brown, or black conjunctival lesion—most often bulbar and near the limbus—sometimes with feeder vessels, irritation, or invasion of eyelid/orbit. It can cause loss of vision or eye, facial disfigurement, and death. Recurrence occurs in approximately 33–45%, regional nodal metastasis in approximately 25%, and reported five-year disease-specific mortality is approximately 27%. Suggested HPO terms include conjunctival pigmentation, conjunctival mass, decreased visual acuity, recurrent neoplasm, and lymph-node metastasis. (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2)
Quality-of-life burdens include visual disability, monocular depth-perception loss, treatment-related retinopathy/optic neuropathy, cosmetic change, anxiety, depression, and fear of recurrence. A 2024 French prospective protocol is specifically measuring HADS, FCRI, EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-OPT30, information satisfaction, and communication in 250 UM survivors, illustrating that psychological surveillance is now a recognized component of care. (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 1-2)
Somatic-driver allele frequencies are tumor frequencies, not population frequencies. Germline variant classification must use ClinVar/ClinGen and ACMG/AMP criteria; tumor-only sequencing cannot establish germline origin. VUS should not direct prophylactic surgery or family testing without validated reclassification.
Monosomy 3, particularly with 8q gain/amplification, is the canonical high-risk cytogenetic pattern. 6p gain is generally associated with a more favorable disomy-3 class; 6q loss and complex 8q alterations occur in intermediate-risk/SF3B1 tumors. BAP1 loss reshapes chromatin and DNA methylation; class-1 versus class-2 UM has distinct methylation, transcriptomic, miRNA, and histone-regulatory programs. Altered miRNAs are promising diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers but are not yet standard standalone tests. (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
DecisionDx-UM’s 12-gene expression profile stratifies tumors into class 1A, 1B, and 2, with reported five-year metastatic risks of approximately 2%, 21%, and 72%, respectively. TCGA-style integration further divides UM into four molecular groups spanning disomy-3/EIF1AX through monosomy-3/BAP1/8q-amplified disease. These are prognostic—not proof that adjuvant systemic therapy improves survival. (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3)
No infectious agent is known to cause UM or Co-M; vaccination and antimicrobial prophylaxis are therefore not applicable. UV radiation has uncertain relevance to posterior UM but a more convincing relationship to conjunctival melanoma. Welding and selected occupational exposures are epidemiological signals rather than established sufficient causes. There is no reproducible evidence that tobacco, alcohol, obesity, diet, or physical inactivity materially changes UM risk. (kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5, butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2)
Suggested GO terms include MAPK cascade, protein kinase C signaling, phosphatidylinositol-mediated signaling, TOR signaling, cell proliferation, negative regulation of apoptosis, chromatin organization, DNA repair, RNA splicing, angiogenesis, cell migration, extracellular-matrix organization, and immune-response regulation.
The eye is immune privileged, and UM generally has low tumor mutational burden—approximately 0.5 mutations/Mb and a median of about 32 coding mutations in one clinical synthesis. Infiltration by lymphocytes and macrophages, HLA-I/II upregulation, NF-κB activation, LAG-3, and galectin-3 can paradoxically mark aggressive disease. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles promote proliferation, migration, and invasion; circulating hybrid cells and ctDNA are emerging markers. (carvajal2022clinicalandmolecular pages 1-2, kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5)
A 2024 single-cell/bulk study analyzed 37,660 malignant cells from 17 tumors, identifying substantial intratumoral transcriptional heterogeneity and two states with different prognosis and immune context. A separate 2024 study combined single-cell RNA/TCR sequencing with metastatic PDX and coculture experiments, finding tumor-reactive T cells among activated, exhausted, and cytotoxic-effector populations—supporting rational TIL/TCR selection. These are human-tissue plus experimental-model findings, not yet validated clinical diagnostics. (karlsson2024patientderivedxenograftsand pages 1-2)
Primary UM affects the uvea: choroid approximately 90%, ciliary body approximately 7%, and iris approximately 2–3%. Secondary local structures include retina, macula, optic disc/nerve, vitreous, sclera, anterior chamber, and orbit. UM is usually unilateral. Dissemination most often affects liver (approximately 89% or more), followed by lung and bone; one review reports lung 29% and bone 17%. (kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
Co-M begins in conjunctival epithelium, commonly bulbar conjunctiva/limbus, and may invade cornea, eyelid, lacrimal drainage structures, orbit, regional nodes, lung, liver, or brain. (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2)
Suggested UBERON terms: eye, uvea, choroid, ciliary body, iris, retina, sclera, conjunctiva, bulbar conjunctiva, orbit, and liver. Suggested CL terms: melanocyte, endothelial cell, fibroblast, macrophage, CD8-positive T cell, and hepatic stellate cell. Relevant subcellular GO compartments include plasma membrane, nucleus/chromatin, spliceosomal complex, mitochondrion, and extracellular vesicle.
UM is predominantly adult/late-adult onset; median diagnosis is approximately 58–62 years, whereas iris melanoma tends to present 10–20 years earlier. Onset is usually chronic and clinically silent. AJCC eighth-edition staging incorporates tumor size/category, ciliary-body involvement, and extraocular extension; metastatic disease is stage IV. (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 1-2, kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3)
At primary diagnosis, fewer than 2% have radiologically detectable metastases, yet 32–45% may develop them within 15 years and some recur more than 30 years later. This supports an early-dissemination/dormancy model and lifelong risk-adapted follow-up. Spontaneous durable remission is exceptional; treatment-induced local control is common, but eradication of occult micrometastases is not assured. (NCT05502900 chunk 1, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
UM incidence is approximately 5–6 per million/year in the United States/Europe, about 7 per million in Australia, and only 0.2–0.3 per million/year in much of Asia and Africa. A 2024 synthesis gives a range of 4.9–7.4 per million in high-incidence populations. Most patients are White/Caucasian; sex differences are small and inconsistent. (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
Most UM is sporadic and multifactorial. BAP1 tumor-predisposition syndrome is autosomal dominant, incompletely penetrant, age-dependent, and variably expressive; anticipation and consanguinity are not characteristic. Founder variants may exist in particular families/populations, but there is no population-wide “carrier frequency” suitable for general screening. Germline testing is most appropriate for young onset, bilateral/multifocal UM, strong family history, or personal/family histories of mesothelioma, renal-cell carcinoma, cutaneous melanoma, or BAP1-inactivated melanocytic tumors.
Co-M incidence is approximately 0.46 per million/year, with an increasing rate ratio around 1.4 and a particularly sharp rise after age 65. It represents approximately 0.25% of all melanomas and 5% of ocular melanomas. (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2)
UM is often diagnosed clinically by an ocular oncologist using dilated fundus examination, slit-lamp examination for anterior tumors, color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, and A-/B-scan ultrasonography. MRI can characterize selected lesions; systemic CT/MRI/ultrasound evaluates metastases, especially liver. Biopsy is not always required for a classic lesion but is used for uncertain diagnosis and molecular prognostication.
Histology shows spindle, mixed, or epithelioid melanoma; epithelioid morphology, high mitotic activity, closed vascular loops, ciliary-body involvement, and extrascleral extension are adverse features. Immunohistochemistry includes melanocytic markers such as SOX10, S100, Melan-A/MART1, HMB45, and nuclear BAP1. Co-M requires excisional biopsy when feasible, careful margin/orientation assessment, and evaluation for pagetoid intraepithelial spread. (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
Differential diagnosis includes choroidal nevus, congenital hypertrophy of retinal pigment epithelium, melanocytoma, hemangioma, metastasis, lymphoma, retinal-pigment-epithelium lesions, inflammatory granuloma, and hemorrhagic retinal detachment. Co-M differentials include conjunctival nevus, C-MIN/PAM, complexion-associated melanosis, foreign-body pigmentation, and ocular-surface squamous neoplasia.
Fine-needle aspiration or resection tissue may undergo chromosome 3/8/6 testing by FISH, SNP array, MLPA, or NGS; BAP1/SF3B1/EIF1AX sequencing; and validated GEP. Broad WES/WGS is useful for atypical cases, research, or metastatic precision oncology but is not required for every primary tumor. CMA can detect copy-number changes; conventional karyotyping has limited sensitivity; mitochondrial and repeat-expansion testing are not relevant. (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3)
Blood ctDNA, circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles, miRNA, and circulating hybrid cells are promising for disease monitoring. Early ctDNA decline during tebentafusp correlates with survival, but liquid biopsy does not yet replace imaging or tissue-based risk classification. Normal liver-function tests cannot exclude hepatic metastasis. (carvajal2022clinicalandmolecular pages 1-2, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
There is no population screening program. High-risk BAP1 families merit genetic counseling, cascade testing for a confirmed pathogenic familial variant, dermatologic/ophthalmic surveillance, and syndrome-specific renal/mesothelioma surveillance.
Overall five-year survival for UM is often reported at 50–70%, with localized-disease estimates around 70–80%. Approximately half ultimately metastasize. Historical median survival after metastatic diagnosis is approximately 6–12 months, with liver involvement driving mortality; older series report nearly 90% mortality by two years after hepatic metastasis. (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
Adverse prognostic factors are large basal diameter/thickness, ciliary-body involvement, extraocular extension, epithelioid morphology, high mitotic rate, monosomy 3, 8q gain, BAP1 loss, class-2 GEP, elevated LDH, high hepatic tumor burden, and poor performance status. Favorable factors include small iris-confined disease, disomy 3, 6p gain, EIF1AX mutation, and class-1A GEP. SF3B1 generally denotes intermediate and sometimes late relapse. (lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 3-7, fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
Morbidity includes irreversible visual-field loss, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, optic neuropathy, cataract, glaucoma, dry eye, enucleation-related monocular disability, and psychological distress. Co-M adds repeated surface surgery, limbal-stem-cell injury, scarring, and possible orbital exenteration. (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 1-2, butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2)
Management is individualized by size, location, visual potential, extraocular extension, and patient preference. Options include observation of selected indeterminate/small lesions; plaque brachytherapy; proton-beam or stereotactic radiotherapy; transpupillary thermotherapy as an adjunct in selected small lesions; local resection; and enucleation for very large, painful, blind, or extensively invasive tumors. Local control does not eliminate pre-existing micrometastases. Suggested NCIT concepts include Plaque Brachytherapy, Proton Radiation Therapy, Local Excision, and Enucleation. (kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2)
Preferred treatment is “no-touch” complete excision with margin control, often with adjuvant cryotherapy. Topical mitomycin-C or interferon, plaque/proton/photon radiotherapy, and exenteration are selected by intraepithelial spread, margins, multifocality, and invasion. Lifelong ocular and nodal surveillance is warranted. BRAF/MEK inhibition or PD-1-based immunotherapy may be considered for molecularly appropriate unresectable/metastatic disease, but evidence remains mainly case reports and small series. (butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2)
Tebentafusp is an engineered gp100–HLA-A02:01 T-cell-receptor/CD3 bispecific and the preferred evidence-based systemic option for eligible HLA-A02:01-positive, unresectable/metastatic UM. In the phase III long-term analysis, median overall survival was 21.6 versus 16.9 months with control (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54–0.87), and three-year survival was 27% versus 18%. Common adverse events were rash 83%, pyrexia 76%, pruritus 70%, and hypotension 38%; only 2% discontinued for toxicity, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Publication: 14 December 2023; DOI/URL: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2304753; NCT03070392. The abstract concludes that the analysis “supported a continued long-term benefit of tebentafusp for overall survival.” (hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3)
In a 127-patient phase II refractory cohort, objective response was only 5%, but one-year survival was 62% and median survival 16.8 months, illustrating that RECIST response underestimates benefit. Early ctDNA reduction correlated with survival. Publication: October 2022; DOI/URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02015-7; NCT02570308. (carvajal2022clinicalandmolecular pages 1-2)
Checkpoint inhibitors—pembrolizumab/nivolumab, ipilimumab, or combinations—have substantially less activity than in cutaneous melanoma because UM is low-TMB and immunosuppressive, but they remain options when tebentafusp is unavailable/inapplicable or in trials. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has low response rates. Liver-dominant disease may be treated with resection/ablation in selected oligometastatic cases, embolization/radioembolization, immunoembolization, isolated or percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan, or other center-specific liver-directed approaches. Multidisciplinary sequencing is essential. (kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5, pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2, hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3)
No validated CPIC-style pharmacogenomic dosing guideline, approved gene therapy, CAR-T product, RNA therapy, or stem-cell therapy currently exists for ocular melanoma.
Primary prevention: no intervention is proven to prevent UM. Sun-safe behavior and UV-blocking eyewear are reasonable, particularly for conjunctival/iris health, but should not be represented as proven posterior-UM prevention. There is no vaccine or chemoprophylaxis.
Secondary prevention: no population screening is recommended because the disease is rare. Routine eye examinations can detect asymptomatic tumors; targeted surveillance is appropriate for choroidal nevi with suspicious growth features, oculodermal melanocytosis, and BAP1 families. Prompt referral of suspicious conjunctival pigmentation prevents diagnostic delay.
Tertiary prevention: preserve vision through timely local treatment and manage radiation retinopathy, glaucoma, cataract, and psychosocial morbidity. Molecular risk stratification guides hepatic imaging every 3–12 months depending on risk; the 2024 GEP review suggests annual imaging for class 1A, every 6–12 months for class 1B, and every 3–6 months for class 2, although schedules vary by guideline and country. (fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3)
Naturally occurring ocular melanocytic neoplasms occur in dogs, cats, and horses. Canine anterior-uveal melanoma is often locally invasive but biologically less predictably metastatic than human posterior UM; feline diffuse iris melanoma can cause glaucoma and metastasis; equine ocular melanocytic disease has breed/color associations. These conditions are veterinary diseases and useful comparative pathology, but they are not exact orthologous models of human GNAQ/GNA11-driven, liver-tropic UM. No infectious transmission or zoonotic potential exists. Suggested taxa include Homo sapiens (NCBI:9606), Canis lupus familiaris (9615), Felis catus (9685), Equus caballus (9796), Mus musculus (10090), and Danio rerio (7955). Breed-specific VBO mappings require veterinary-database curation.
Model systems include established UM cell lines, three-dimensional spheroids/organoids, primary cultures, chicken chorioallantoic membrane assays, zebrafish xenografts/transgenics, mouse subcutaneous and orthotopic xenografts, PDX, syngeneic models, and genetically engineered GNAQ/GNA11-pathway models.
A 2023 zebrafish PDX platform generated spheroids from primary human UM within 24 hours, retained melanocytic markers, and produced a reproducible metastatic phenotype after intravenous implantation. Experiments used at least two biological replicates with more than 20 fish each; navitoclax and everolimus demonstrated utility for rapid drug-response screening. Publication: 15 April 2023; DOI/URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040598. The abstract states that the model “recapitulated molecular features of the disseminating UM.” (yin2023zebrafishpatientderivedxenograft pages 1-2)
Mouse PDX preserves patient-specific architecture/genomics and supports pharmacology, while orthotopic models reproduce ocular growth. Limitations include immunodeficiency, variable engraftment, cost, long latency, and incomplete hepatic tropism. Syngeneic models retain immunity but frequently use cutaneous melanoma cells whose genetics differ from UM. Zebrafish enables live imaging, small sample requirements, and high-throughput screening but differs in temperature, pharmacokinetics, adaptive immunity, and ocular/liver physiology. No single model reproduces the complete human genetic, histologic, immune, dormancy, and metastatic phenotype; convergent validation across organoid, zebrafish, PDX, and immune-competent systems is preferable. (yin2023zebrafishpatientderivedxenograft pages 1-2, karlsson2024patientderivedxenograftsand pages 1-2)
The strongest treatment evidence is the randomized phase III tebentafusp trial. Epidemiology, genetics, and natural history are supported by large aggregated cohorts and recent 2023–2024 reviews, whereas protective factors, Co-M systemic therapy, adjuvant prevention, liquid-biopsy surveillance, and many multi-omics signatures remain investigational. Direct abstract quotations were limited to short passages to preserve context. DOI URLs and publication dates are provided where retrieved; PMIDs were not consistently present in the retrieved metadata and should be added through PubMed cross-linking rather than inferred. Exact HPO, UBERON, CL, GO, NCIT, ICD-11, OMIM, Orphanet, and MeSH identifiers flagged as “suggested” should undergo ontology-service validation before production ingestion.
References
(butt2024conjunctivalmelanomaa pages 1-2): Karam Butt, Rumana Hussain, Sarah Ellen Coupland, and Yamini Krishna. Conjunctival melanoma: a clinical review and update. Cancers, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183121, doi:10.3390/cancers16183121. This article has 20 citations.
(pasalic2023geneticandepigenetic pages 1-2): Daria Pašalić, Tamara Nikuševa-Martić, Ankica Sekovanić, and Snježana Kaštelan. Genetic and epigenetic features of uveal melanoma—an overview and clinical implications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24:12807, Aug 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612807, doi:10.3390/ijms241612807. This article has 23 citations.
(kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 2-3): SNJEŽANA KAŠTELAN, ANA DIDOVIĆ PAVIČIĆ, DARIA PAŠALIĆ, TAMARA NIKUŠEVA-MARTIĆ, SAMIR ČANOVIĆ, PETRA KOVAČEVIĆ, and SUZANA KONJEVODA. Biological characteristics and clinical management of uveal and conjunctival melanoma. Oncology Research, 32:1265-1285, Jul 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2024.048437, doi:10.32604/or.2024.048437. This article has 9 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(fuentesrodriguez2024recentadvancesin pages 2-3): Aurélie Fuentes-Rodriguez, Andrew Mitchell, Sylvain L. Guérin, and Solange Landreville. Recent advances in molecular and genetic research on uveal melanoma. Cells, 13:1023, Jun 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13121023, doi:10.3390/cells13121023. This article has 27 citations.
(hassel2023threeyearoverallsurvival pages 1-3): Jessica C. Hassel, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Piotr Rutkowski, Jean-Francois Baurain, Max Schlaak, Marcus O. Butler, Ryan J. Sullivan, Reinhard Dummer, John M. Kirkwood, Marlana Orloff, Joseph J. Sacco, Sebastian Ochsenreither, Anthony M. Joshua, Lauris Gastaud, Brendan Curti, Josep M. Piulats, April K.S. Salama, Alexander N. Shoushtari, Lev Demidov, Mohammed Milhem, Bartosz Chmielowski, Kevin B. Kim, Richard D. Carvajal, Omid Hamid, Laura Collins, Koustubh Ranade, Chris Holland, Constance Pfeiffer, and Paul Nathan. Three-year overall survival with tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 389:2256-2266, Dec 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2304753, doi:10.1056/nejmoa2304753. This article has 341 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(OpenTargets Search: uveal melanoma,ocular melanoma,conjunctival melanoma): Open Targets Query (uveal melanoma,ocular melanoma,conjunctival melanoma, 31 results). Buniello, A. et al. (2025). Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Research.
(lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 1-3): Karina Lissak, Zuzanna Szczepaniak, Agata Konopka, Natalia Wdowiak, Martyna Choinka, Małgorzata Komarów, Dominika Karasińska, Jakub Kalisiak, Mateusz Koralewicz, Milena Orzeł, and Bartłomiej Orzeł. What sets uveal melanoma apart, and how can we address it? a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Quality in Sport, 23:55123, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.12775/qs.2024.23.55123, doi:10.12775/qs.2024.23.55123. This article has 1 citations.
(kulbay2024uvealmelanomacomprehensive pages 2-5): Merve Kulbay, Emily Marcotte, Raheem Remtulla, Tsz Hin Alexander Lau, Manuel Paez-Escamilla, Kevin Y. Wu, and Miguel N. Burnier. Uveal melanoma: comprehensive review of its pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and future perspectives. Biomedicines, 12:1758, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12081758, doi:10.3390/biomedicines12081758. This article has 48 citations.
(lissak2024whatsetsuveal pages 3-7): Karina Lissak, Zuzanna Szczepaniak, Agata Konopka, Natalia Wdowiak, Martyna Choinka, Małgorzata Komarów, Dominika Karasińska, Jakub Kalisiak, Mateusz Koralewicz, Milena Orzeł, and Bartłomiej Orzeł. What sets uveal melanoma apart, and how can we address it? a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Quality in Sport, 23:55123, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.12775/qs.2024.23.55123, doi:10.12775/qs.2024.23.55123. This article has 1 citations.
(karlsson2024patientderivedxenograftsand pages 1-2): Joakim Karlsson, Vasu R. Sah, Roger Olofsson Bagge, Munir Iqbal, Samuel Alsén, Sofia Stenqvist, Alka Saxena, Lars Ny, Lisa M. Nilsson, and Jonas A. Nilsson. Patient-derived xenografts and single-cell sequencing identifies three subtypes of tumor-reactive lymphocytes in uveal melanoma metastases. eLife, May 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.91705, doi:10.7554/elife.91705. This article has 6 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(kastelan2024biologicalcharacteristicsand pages 1-2): SNJEŽANA KAŠTELAN, ANA DIDOVIĆ PAVIČIĆ, DARIA PAŠALIĆ, TAMARA NIKUŠEVA-MARTIĆ, SAMIR ČANOVIĆ, PETRA KOVAČEVIĆ, and SUZANA KONJEVODA. Biological characteristics and clinical management of uveal and conjunctival melanoma. Oncology Research, 32:1265-1285, Jul 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2024.048437, doi:10.32604/or.2024.048437. This article has 9 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(NCT05907954 chunk 1): (Neo)Adjuvant IDE196 (Darovasertib) in Patients With Localized Ocular Melanoma. IDEAYA Biosciences. 2023. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05907954
(NCT06007690 chunk 1): A Phase 3 Randomized, Masked, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Belzupacap Sarotalocan (AU-011) Treatment Compared to Sham Control in Subjects With Primary Indeterminate Lesions or Small Choroidal Melanoma. Aura Biosciences. 2023. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06007690
(NCT05502900 chunk 1): Gustav Stalhammar. Adjuvant Melatonin for Uveal Melanoma. Gustav Stalhammar. 2022. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05502900
(yin2023zebrafishpatientderivedxenograft pages 1-2): Jie Yin, Gangyin Zhao, Helen Kalirai, Sarah E. Coupland, Aart G. Jochemsen, Gabriel Forn-Cuní, Annemijn P. A. Wierenga, Martine J. Jager, B. Ewa Snaar-Jagalska, and Arwin Groenewoud. Zebrafish patient-derived xenograft model as a preclinical platform for uveal melanoma drug discovery. Pharmaceuticals, 16:598, Apr 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040598, doi:10.3390/ph16040598. This article has 22 citations.
(sorrentino2024geneticfeaturesof pages 1-2): Francesco Saverio Sorrentino, Carola Culiersi, Antonio Florido, Katia De Nadai, Ginevra Giovanna Adamo, Francesco Nasini, Chiara Vivarelli, Marco Mura, and Francesco Parmeggiani. Genetic features of uveal melanoma. Genes, 15:1356, Oct 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111356, doi:10.3390/genes15111356. This article has 12 citations.
(carvajal2022clinicalandmolecular pages 1-2): Richard D. Carvajal, Marcus O. Butler, Alexander N. Shoushtari, Jessica C. Hassel, Alexandra Ikeguchi, Leonel Hernandez-Aya, Paul Nathan, Omid Hamid, Josep M. Piulats, Matthew Rioth, Douglas B. Johnson, Jason J. Luke, Enrique Espinosa, Serge Leyvraz, Laura Collins, Howard M. Goodall, Koustubh Ranade, Chris Holland, Shaad E. Abdullah, Joseph J. Sacco, and Takami Sato. Clinical and molecular response to tebentafusp in previously treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: a phase 2 trial. Nature Medicine, 28:2364-2373, Oct 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02015-7, doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02015-7. This article has 196 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.