Impetigo is an acute, highly contagious superficial bacterial infection of the epidermis caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, or both. Nonbullous disease produces vesiculopustules that rupture into honey-colored crusted erosions, whereas toxigenic S. aureus causes bullous impetigo by secreting exfoliative toxins that cleave desmoglein 1 and split the granular layer of the epidermis.
Ask a research question about Impetigo. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
name: Impetigo
creation_date: "2026-09-29T17:30:14Z"
description: >-
Impetigo is an acute, highly contagious superficial bacterial infection of the
epidermis caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, or both.
Nonbullous disease produces vesiculopustules that rupture into honey-colored
crusted erosions, whereas toxigenic S. aureus causes bullous impetigo by
secreting exfoliative toxins that cleave desmoglein 1 and split the granular
layer of the epidermis.
category: Infectious Disease
disease_term:
preferred_term: impetigo
term:
id: MONDO:0004592
label: impetigo
parents:
- Bacterial infection
synonyms:
- Impetigo contagiosa
- School sores
- Crusted impetigo
- Impetigo vulgaris
notes: >-
Bullous impetigo is the localized form of exfoliative-toxin skin disease;
the generalized toxin-mediated form is curated separately as
Staphylococcal_Scalded_Skin_Syndrome. Ecthyma, the ulcerative form of
pyoderma, is outside this entry's scope.
infectious_agent:
- name: Staphylococcus aureus
infectious_agent_term:
preferred_term: Staphylococcus aureus
term:
id: NCBITaxon:1280
label: Staphylococcus aureus
description: >-
Staphylococcus aureus causes nonbullous impetigo and, when the strain
expresses exfoliative toxins, bullous impetigo.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Impetigo can be nonbullous (70%) or bullous (30%) and is most commonly
caused by group A streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus.
explanation: >-
Identifies S. aureus as one of the two principal bacterial causes of
impetigo.
- reference: PMID:17582744
reference_title: >-
Staphylococcal exfoliative toxins: "molecular scissors" of bacteria that
attack the cutaneous defense barrier in mammals.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Bullous impetigo and its generalized form, staphylococcal scalded-skin
syndrome (SSSS), are highly contagious, blistering skin diseases caused by
Staphylococcus aureus infection.
explanation: >-
This review ties toxigenic S. aureus specifically to the bullous impetigo
branch.
- name: Streptococcus pyogenes
infectious_agent_term:
preferred_term: Streptococcus pyogenes
term:
id: NCBITaxon:1314
label: Streptococcus pyogenes
description: >-
Group A Streptococcus contributes to nonbullous impetigo and can seed
post-streptococcal immune sequelae after skin infection.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Impetigo can be nonbullous (70%) or bullous (30%) and is most commonly
caused by group A streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus.
explanation: >-
Identifies group A Streptococcus as one of the two principal bacterial
causes of impetigo.
classifications:
harrisons_chapter:
- classification_value: INFECTIOUS_DISEASES
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33105179
reference_title: Impetigo.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Impetigo is a common superficial bacterial infection of the skin, with a
global disease burden of greater than 140 million.
explanation: >-
This frames impetigo as a bacterial skin infection, supporting
classification in Harrison's Infectious Diseases Part.
has_subtypes:
- name: Nonbullous
display_name: Nonbullous impetigo
description: >-
The more common form, caused by S. aureus, S. pyogenes, or both, presenting
as papules and vesiculopustules that rupture into honey-colored crusts.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33105179
reference_title: Impetigo.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
There are two common variants of impetigo: nonbullous (70%) and bullous
(30%). Nonbullous impetigo is caused by S. aureus and S. pyogenes whereas
bullous impetigo is caused by S. aureus.
explanation: >-
Distinguishes nonbullous impetigo by its mixed staphylococcal and
streptococcal microbiology.
- name: Bullous
display_name: Bullous impetigo
subtype_term:
preferred_term: bullous impetigo
term:
id: MONDO:0018182
label: bullous impetigo
description: >-
Localized blistering form caused by exfoliative-toxin-producing S. aureus,
presenting as flaccid superficial bullae.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33105179
reference_title: Impetigo.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
There are two common variants of impetigo: nonbullous (70%) and bullous
(30%). Nonbullous impetigo is caused by S. aureus and S. pyogenes whereas
bullous impetigo is caused by S. aureus.
explanation: >-
Distinguishes bullous impetigo as the staphylococcal-only variant.
- reference: PMID:17582744
reference_title: >-
Staphylococcal exfoliative toxins: "molecular scissors" of bacteria that
attack the cutaneous defense barrier in mammals.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Bullous impetigo and its generalized form, staphylococcal scalded-skin
syndrome (SSSS), are highly contagious, blistering skin diseases caused by
Staphylococcus aureus infection.
explanation: >-
Documents the blistering presentation that separates the bullous form.
prevalence:
- population: Children worldwide (population-based surveillance studies)
measure_type: POINT_PREVALENCE
prevalence_class: ABOVE_1_IN_1000
rate_per_100000: 12300.0
notes: >-
Median childhood prevalence 12.3% (IQR 4.2-19.4%) across 82 population
surveillance studies; the authors estimate more than 162 million children
affected at any one time, predominantly in tropical, resource-poor
settings.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26317533
reference_title: >-
The Global Epidemiology of Impetigo: A Systematic Review of the Population
Prevalence of Impetigo and Pyoderma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: "Median childhood prevalence was 12·3% (IQR 4·2-19·4%)."
explanation: >-
Systematic review of population surveillance studies giving the median
childhood point prevalence of impetigo.
- reference: PMID:26317533
reference_title: >-
The Global Epidemiology of Impetigo: A Systematic Review of the Population
Prevalence of Impetigo and Pyoderma.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
quote_role: PRIMARY_RESULT
snippet: >-
we estimate the global population of children suffering from impetigo at
any one time to be in excess of 162 million, predominantly in tropical,
resource-poor contexts.
explanation: >-
Extrapolates the pooled prevalence to a global count of children affected
at any one time.
- population: Worldwide, all ages
measure_type: UNKNOWN
notes: >-
Global disease burden of greater than 140 million; the source does not
state the measure.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33105179
reference_title: Impetigo.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Impetigo is a common superficial bacterial infection of the skin, with a
global disease burden of greater than 140 million.
explanation: >-
Review statement of the global burden of impetigo.
progression:
- phase: Papulovesicular onset
notes: >-
Lesions begin as erythematous papules that progress to thin-walled
vesicles or pustules.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Impetigo begins as erythematous papules, progressing to thinly walled
pustules that rupture and crust over with a progressively thickening scab.
explanation: >-
Describes the papular onset and pustular stage of impetigo lesions.
- phase: Rupture and crusting
duration: 4 to 6 days
notes: >-
Vesicles, pustules, or bullae rupture and form honey-colored crusts over
4 to 6 days.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
erythematous papules that progress to ruptured vesicles or bullae over 4
to 6 days, forming honey-colored crusts.
explanation: >-
Gives the timing of progression from papules to ruptured, crusted lesions.
- phase: Healing
duration: up to 30 days without treatment
notes: >-
The scab shrinks and the eroded base heals, often without scarring;
untreated resolution can take 30 days.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
As healing begins, the scab shrinks, tethering surrounding skin to heal
the eroded base, often without scarring.
explanation: >-
Describes the healing phase of impetigo lesions.
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "Without treatment, resolution can take 30 days"
explanation: >-
Gives the duration of untreated resolution.
transmission:
- name: Direct-contact and fomite spread with autoinoculation
description: >-
Impetigo spreads efficiently from colonized lesions by skin-to-skin contact,
contact with contaminated objects, and self-inoculation to additional
breached epidermal sites.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Reducing the spread and recurrence of impetigo includes good hand hygiene,
thoroughly washing objects used by people with impetigo, and refraining
from returning to work or school until 12 to 24 hours after initiating
antibiotic treatment or clinical improvement occurs.
explanation: >-
Hand hygiene, object washing, and temporary school or work exclusion
support direct-contact and fomite spread among close contacts.
pathophysiology:
- name: Epidermal Barrier Disruption
role: trigger
biological_scale: TISSUE
description: >-
Breaks in the epidermal barrier from abrasions, insect bites, scabies,
atopic dermatitis, or other minor skin trauma expose a superficial niche
for S. aureus and S. pyogenes.
locations:
- preferred_term: skin epidermis
term:
id: UBERON:0001003
label: skin epidermis
downstream:
- target: Superficial Bacterial Colonization
description: >-
The breached epidermis allows S. aureus, S. pyogenes, or both to
establish and proliferate locally.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Infection may be direct or secondary to cutaneous barrier damage resulting
from insect bites, minor trauma, or other pruritic dermatoses, especially
scabies, head lice and tinea.
explanation: >-
Names cutaneous barrier damage, including scabies and other pruritic
dermatoses, as the setting for secondary impetigo.
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Risk factors for impetigo include disruptions to the skin barrier, poor
hygiene, crowded living environments, living in hot and humid climates,
malnutrition, and diabetes.
explanation: >-
Lists disruption of the skin barrier as a risk factor for impetigo.
- name: Superficial Bacterial Colonization
role: cause
biological_scale: TISSUE
description: >-
S. aureus, S. pyogenes, or both colonize and proliferate in the superficial
epidermis at the breached site.
locations:
- preferred_term: skin epidermis
term:
id: UBERON:0001003
label: skin epidermis
cell_types:
- preferred_term: keratinocyte
term:
id: CL:0000312
label: keratinocyte
downstream:
- target: Nonbullous Pyogenic Epidermal Infection
description: >-
S. pyogenes, S. aureus, or both proliferate locally to produce
vesiculopustules and crusted erosions.
- target: Exfoliative Toxin Production by S. aureus
description: >-
Toxigenic S. aureus expresses exfoliative toxins at the infected epidermal
site.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:28655473
reference_title: >-
Keratinocytes as sensors and central players in the immune defense against
Staphylococcus aureus in the skin.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Staphylococcus aureus is only rarely found on healthy human skin, but
frequently colonizes the skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients
explanation: >-
Supports defective or inflamed epidermal barrier states as permissive for
S. aureus colonization.
- reference: PMID:31755570
reference_title: >-
Disseminated bullous impetigo and atopic dermatitis: Case series and
literature review.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Due to compromised barrier function and immune dysregulation, children
with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at increased risk of cutaneous infections
explanation: >-
Links a compromised epidermal barrier in atopic dermatitis to increased
risk of cutaneous bacterial infection.
- reference: PMID:31755570
reference_title: >-
Disseminated bullous impetigo and atopic dermatitis: Case series and
literature review.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Eleven children (92%) had severe AD."
explanation: >-
In a case series of disseminated bullous impetigo, nearly all children had
severe atopic dermatitis, consistent with barrier-defective skin favoring
S. aureus infection.
- name: Nonbullous Pyogenic Epidermal Infection
role: cause
biological_scale: TISSUE
description: >-
S. pyogenes and non-toxigenic or toxigenic S. aureus proliferate in the
superficial epidermis, recruiting neutrophils and creating vesicles and
pustules that rupture into the honey-colored crusts of nonbullous impetigo.
locations:
- preferred_term: skin epidermis
term:
id: UBERON:0001003
label: skin epidermis
cell_types:
- preferred_term: keratinocyte
term:
id: CL:0000312
label: keratinocyte
- preferred_term: neutrophil
term:
id: CL:0000775
label: neutrophil
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: inflammatory response
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0006954
label: inflammatory response
downstream:
- target: Vesicles
description: >-
Superficial pyogenic infection produces vesicles from the initial
erythematous papules.
- target: Pustules
description: >-
Neutrophil-rich superficial infection produces thin-walled pustules.
- target: Honey-colored crusts
description: >-
Vesicles and pustules rupture and dry into the characteristic crusted
superficial erosions.
- target: Post-Streptococcal Immune Sequelae
description: >-
Group A streptococcal skin infection can antecede acute
post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis and acute rheumatic fever in
endemic communities.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33105179
reference_title: Impetigo.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Nonbullous impetigo is caused by S. aureus and S. pyogenes whereas
bullous impetigo is caused by S. aureus.
explanation: >-
This distinguishes the streptococcal/staphylococcal microbiology of
nonbullous disease from the staphylococcal-only bullous branch.
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Impetigo begins as erythematous papules, progressing to thinly walled
pustules that rupture and crust over with a progressively thickening scab.
explanation: >-
Describes the papule-to-pustule-to-crust evolution of the superficial
infection.
- name: Exfoliative Toxin Production by S. aureus
role: cause
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
description: >-
Toxigenic S. aureus strains express ETA or ETB, encoded on a phage genome or
plasmid respectively, and secrete exfoliative toxin as the pathogen effector
that initiates bullous impetigo.
downstream:
- target: Desmoglein 1 Ectodomain Cleavage
description: >-
Secreted exfoliative toxin reaches superficial keratinocyte desmosomes and
cleaves desmoglein 1.
causal_link_type: DIRECT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21282415
reference_title: Regulatory mechanism for exfoliative toxin production in Staphylococcus aureus.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
quote_role: BACKGROUND
snippet: >-
Most S. aureus strains that cause blistering disease produce either ETA or
ETB. They are serologically distinct molecules, where ETA is encoded on a
phage genome and ETB is enocded on a large plasmid.
explanation: >-
Introduction background in a bacterial-genetics study, identifying ETA and
ETB as the common exfoliative toxins of blistering S. aureus disease and
their phage and plasmid genetic contexts.
- name: Desmoglein 1 Ectodomain Cleavage
role: cause
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
description: >-
Staphylococcal exfoliative toxins are glutamate-specific serine proteases
that cleave one peptide bond in the extracellular region of desmoglein 1,
disrupting superficial keratinocyte adhesion at desmosomes.
genes:
- preferred_term: DSG1
term:
id: hgnc:3048
label: DSG1
cell_types:
- preferred_term: keratinocyte
term:
id: CL:0000312
label: keratinocyte
molecular_functions:
- preferred_term: exfoliative toxin serine protease activity
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0008233
label: peptidase activity
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: desmoglein 1 proteolysis
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0006508
label: proteolysis
cellular_components:
- preferred_term: desmosome
term:
id: GO:0030057
label: desmosome
downstream:
- target: Granular-Layer Acantholysis and Bullae
description: >-
Loss of the adhesive Dsg1 ectodomain is sufficient to produce the
superficial intraepidermal blister.
causal_link_type: DIRECT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17582744
reference_title: >-
Staphylococcal exfoliative toxins: "molecular scissors" of bacteria that
attack the cutaneous defense barrier in mammals.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
the three isoforms of ETs, i.e., ETA, ETB, and ETD, are
glutamate-specific serine proteases that specifically and efficiently
cleave a single peptide bond in the extracellular region of human and
mouse desmoglein 1 (Dsg1), a desmosomal intercellular adhesion molecule
explanation: >-
Defines exfoliative toxins as glutamate-specific proteases that cleave a
single extracellular peptide bond in desmoglein 1.
- reference: PMID:20728315
reference_title: >-
Removal of amino-terminal extracellular domains of desmoglein 1 by
staphylococcal exfoliative toxin is sufficient to initiate epidermal
blister formation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: >-
Our findings suggest that the removal of amino-terminal extracellular
domains of Dsg1 by ETs is sufficient to initiate epidermal blister
formation in bullous impetigo and SSSS.
explanation: >-
Shows in a neonatal mouse model that exfoliative-toxin removal of the Dsg1
ectodomain is sufficient to initiate bullous impetigo-like blistering.
- name: Granular-Layer Acantholysis and Bullae
role: outcome
biological_scale: TISSUE
description: >-
Cleavage of desmoglein 1 separates superficial keratinocytes at the granular
layer, creating a flaccid intraepidermal blister whose roof ruptures into
moist erosions and crust.
locations:
- preferred_term: skin epidermis
term:
id: UBERON:0001003
label: skin epidermis
cell_types:
- preferred_term: keratinocyte
term:
id: CL:0000312
label: keratinocyte
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: homophilic cell-cell adhesion
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0007156
label: homophilic cell-cell adhesion
cellular_components:
- preferred_term: desmosome
term:
id: GO:0030057
label: desmosome
downstream:
- target: Flaccid bullae
description: >-
The superficial intraepidermal split manifests clinically as flaccid
bullae in bullous impetigo.
- target: Honey-colored crusts
description: >-
The fragile bullae rupture into moist erosions that crust over.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:20728315
reference_title: >-
Removal of amino-terminal extracellular domains of desmoglein 1 by
staphylococcal exfoliative toxin is sufficient to initiate epidermal
blister formation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: >-
Epidermal blister formation was observed as early as 60 min after ETA
treatment.
explanation: >-
The neonatal mouse model develops rapid epidermal blistering after ETA
exposure.
- name: Post-Streptococcal Immune Sequelae
role: outcome
biological_scale: ORGANISM
description: >-
Group A streptococcal impetigo can trigger serious post-infectious
complications, including acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis and
acute rheumatic fever, in high-burden communities.
downstream: []
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Impetigo, scabies, cellulitis and abscesses are common in Australian
Aboriginal children. These conditions adversely affect wellbeing and are
associated with serious long term sequelae, including invasive infection
and post-infectious complications, such as acute post-streptococcal
glomerulonephritis and acute rheumatic fever
explanation: >-
This review links impetigo in a high-burden pediatric setting to severe
invasive and post-infectious sequelae.
phenotypes:
- category: Skin
name: Honey-colored crusts
description: >-
Ruptured vesicles, pustules, and bullae dry into honey-colored crusts over
superficial erosions, the classic visible sign of impetigo.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Honey-colored crusted skin erosion
term:
id: HP:0200041
label: Skin erosion
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Diagnosis of impetigo is based primarily on clinical examination and
should be suspected in individuals with erythematous papules that progress
to ruptured vesicles or bullae over 4 to 6 days, forming honey-colored
crusts.
explanation: >-
The review describes ruptured vesicles and bullae that dry into
honey-colored crusts. HPO has no honey-crust-specific term; the lesion is
a superficial epidermal erosion rather than an ulcer, so it is bound to
Skin erosion.
- category: Skin
name: Vesicles
description: Erythematous papules evolve into vesicles in early impetigo.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Skin vesicle
term:
id: HP:0200037
label: Skin vesicle
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Diagnosis of impetigo is based primarily on clinical examination and
should be suspected in individuals with erythematous papules that progress
to ruptured vesicles or bullae over 4 to 6 days, forming honey-colored
crusts.
explanation: This supports vesicles as an early lesion stage.
- category: Skin
name: Pustules
description: >-
Erythematous papules progress to thin-walled pustules that rupture and
crust.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Pustule
term:
id: HP:0200039
label: Pustule
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Impetigo begins as erythematous papules, progressing to thinly walled
pustules that rupture and crust over with a progressively thickening scab.
explanation: >-
Describes thin-walled pustules as a stage of impetigo lesion evolution.
- category: Skin
name: Flaccid bullae
subtype: Bullous
description: Bullous impetigo produces fragile superficial blisters.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Abnormal blistering of the skin
term:
id: HP:0008066
label: Abnormal blistering of the skin
evidence:
- reference: PMID:17582744
reference_title: >-
Staphylococcal exfoliative toxins: "molecular scissors" of bacteria that
attack the cutaneous defense barrier in mammals.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Bullous impetigo and its generalized form, staphylococcal scalded-skin
syndrome (SSSS), are highly contagious, blistering skin diseases caused by
Staphylococcus aureus infection.
explanation: >-
Establishes blistering as the defining manifestation of bullous impetigo.
diagnosis:
- name: Clinical Diagnosis of Crusted Vesiculobullous Lesions
description: >-
Impetigo is usually diagnosed clinically from erythematous papules evolving
over days into ruptured vesicles or bullae with honey-colored crusts; swab
culture is reserved for recurrent, extensive, outbreak-associated, or
methicillin-resistant S. aureus-suspected disease.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Diagnosis of impetigo is based primarily on clinical examination and
should be suspected in individuals with erythematous papules that progress
to ruptured vesicles or bullae over 4 to 6 days, forming honey-colored
crusts.
explanation: >-
Supports recognition of impetigo by clinical examination of the evolving
vesiculobullous crusted eruption.
treatments:
- name: Topical Antibiotic Therapy for Limited Impetigo
description: >-
Limited impetigo is treated with topical antibiotics such as mupirocin,
retapamulin, ozenoxacin, or fusidic acid, which kill S. aureus and
S. pyogenes locally and shorten the contagious superficial infection.
Resistance limits these agents: the fusidic acid-resistant epidemic
European impetigo clone (EEFIC) of S. aureus has persisted in Belgium, and
a variant of it carrying mupirocin resistance has spread among children
there.
therapeutic_modality: SMALL_MOLECULE
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Antibiotic Therapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15620
label: Antibiotic Therapy
therapeutic_agent:
- preferred_term: mupirocin
term:
id: CHEBI:7025
label: mupirocin
- preferred_term: retapamulin
term:
id: CHEBI:166679
label: Retapamulin
- preferred_term: ozenoxacin
term:
id: CHEBI:136050
label: ozenoxacin
- preferred_term: fusidic acid
term:
id: CHEBI:29013
label: fusidic acid
target_mechanisms:
- target: Nonbullous Pyogenic Epidermal Infection
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Topical antibiotics suppress superficial bacterial proliferation.
- target: Exfoliative Toxin Production by S. aureus
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Topical antibiotics suppress toxigenic S. aureus in localized bullous
impetigo before additional toxin can be produced.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Topical mupirocin 2% ointment or retapamulin 1% ointment are the
recommended initial treatments for mild, nonbullous and bullous impetigo.
explanation: >-
This supports topical antibiotic therapy as initial treatment for mild
impetigo of either clinical form.
- reference: PMID:15106198
reference_title: Interventions for impetigo.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Topical antibiotics showed better cure rates than placebo (pooled odds
ratio (OR) 6.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.93 to 10.73)
explanation: >-
Cochrane randomized-trial synthesis supports the efficacy of topical
antibiotics for impetigo.
- reference: PMID:15106198
reference_title: Interventions for impetigo.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
There is good evidence that topical mupirocin and topical fusidic acid are
equally, or more effective than oral treatment for people with limited
disease.
explanation: >-
Supports topical fusidic acid, alongside mupirocin, for limited impetigo.
- reference: PMID:29898217
reference_title: >-
Efficacy and Safety of Ozenoxacin Cream for Treatment of Adult and
Pediatric Patients With Impetigo: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Topical ozenoxacin is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of
impetigo in patients 2 months and older.
explanation: >-
Randomized vehicle-controlled trial supporting topical ozenoxacin for
impetigo.
- reference: PMID:37358399
reference_title: >-
Persistence of the Staphylococcus aureus epidemic European fusidic
acid-resistant impetigo clone (EEFIC) in Belgium.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
EEFIC isolates were mostly isolated from young patients with impetigo and
showed a seasonal late summer peak.
explanation: >-
National surveillance shows the fusidic acid-resistant EEFIC clone
persisting among young patients with impetigo, a resistance caveat for
topical fusidic acid.
- reference: PMID:38726693
reference_title: >-
Emergence and spread of a mupirocin-resistant variant of the European
epidemic fusidic acid-resistant impetigo clone of Staphylococcus aureus,
Belgium, 2013 to 2023.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
We highlight the spread of a mupirocin-resistant EEFIC in children, with a
seasonal trend for the third quarter of the year. This is of concern
because this variant is resistant to the two main topical antibiotics
used to treat impetigo in Belgium.
explanation: >-
Documents a variant of the clone resistant to both mupirocin and fusidic
acid, the main topical agents for impetigo in Belgium.
- name: Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Extensive or Outbreak Disease
description: >-
Oral antibiotics targeting both group A Streptococcus and S. aureus are used
for severe, multilesional, or outbreak-associated impetigo when topical
therapy is insufficient to control bacterial proliferation and transmission.
therapeutic_modality: SMALL_MOLECULE
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Antibiotic Therapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15620
label: Antibiotic Therapy
therapeutic_agent:
- preferred_term: dicloxacillin
term:
id: CHEBI:4511
label: dicloxacillin
- preferred_term: cephalexin
term:
id: CHEBI:3534
label: cephalexin
target_mechanisms:
- target: Nonbullous Pyogenic Epidermal Infection
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: Oral antibiotics suppress disseminated superficial infection.
- target: Exfoliative Toxin Production by S. aureus
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: Oral antibiotics treat extensive bullous impetigo.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Oral antibiotics, such as dicloxacillin or cephalexin, should be targeted
to group A streptococci and S. aureus and are recommended for outbreaks to
decrease infection transmission or for severe, multilesional disease that
does not respond to topical therapy within 3 to 5 days.
explanation: >-
This supports oral therapy for severe, multilesional, outbreak-associated,
or topical-nonresponsive impetigo.
- name: Ivermectin Mass Drug Administration for Scabies-Associated Community Impetigo
description: >-
In communities where scabies is a major upstream breach in the skin barrier,
ivermectin-based mass drug administration reduces scabies infestation and
thereby reduces impetigo prevalence at the population level.
therapeutic_modality: SMALL_MOLECULE
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Pharmacotherapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15986
label: Pharmacotherapy
therapeutic_agent:
- preferred_term: ivermectin
term:
id: CHEBI:6078
label: ivermectin
target_mechanisms:
- target: Epidermal Barrier Disruption
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Scabies control lowers one infestation-driven source of scratching and
epidermal barrier breaks.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26650152
reference_title: Mass Drug Administration for Scabies Control in a Population with Endemic Disease.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The prevalence of impetigo also declined in all groups, with the greatest
reduction seen in the ivermectin group.
explanation: >-
In a Fiji cluster-randomized trial for scabies control, the ivermectin MDA
arm produced the largest drop in impetigo prevalence.
environmental:
- name: Scabies infestation
description: >-
Scabies is a pruritic dermatosis whose resulting barrier damage precedes
secondary impetigo, particularly in communities where both are endemic.
notes: >-
No ECTO exposure term for scabies or Sarcoptes scabiei: ols:ecto searches
for "scabies" returned only ECTO:9002125 exposure to scabicide, and for
"Sarcoptes scabiei" returned nothing.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Infection may be direct or secondary to cutaneous barrier damage resulting
from insect bites, minor trauma, or other pruritic dermatoses, especially
scabies, head lice and tinea.
explanation: >-
Names scabies as a leading pruritic dermatosis behind barrier damage that
precedes impetigo.
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Epidermal Barrier Disruption
environmental_effect: PREDISPOSES
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_KNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
description: >-
Scabies-associated pruritus and scratching damage the epidermis, opening
the barrier breaks in which impetigo arises.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31630410
reference_title: "Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children: a narrative review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Infection may be direct or secondary to cutaneous barrier damage
resulting from insect bites, minor trauma, or other pruritic dermatoses,
especially scabies, head lice and tinea.
explanation: >-
Places scabies upstream of the cutaneous barrier damage that permits
secondary impetigo.
- reference: PMID:26650152
reference_title: Mass Drug Administration for Scabies Control in a Population with Endemic Disease.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The prevalence of impetigo also declined in all groups, with the
greatest reduction seen in the ivermectin group.
explanation: >-
Scabies control lowered impetigo prevalence, consistent with scabies
acting upstream of impetigo.
- name: Crowded living environments
description: >-
Crowded housing increases close skin contact and is a recognized risk
factor for impetigo.
notes: >-
No ECTO exposure term for crowding: ols:ecto searches for "crowding" and
"crowded" returned nothing.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Risk factors for impetigo include disruptions to the skin barrier, poor
hygiene, crowded living environments, living in hot and humid climates,
malnutrition, and diabetes.
explanation: Lists crowded living environments as a risk factor for impetigo.
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Superficial Bacterial Colonization
environmental_effect: PREDISPOSES
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
description: >-
Crowding raises the chance that S. aureus or S. pyogenes reaches and
colonizes breached skin.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Risk factors for impetigo include disruptions to the skin barrier, poor
hygiene, crowded living environments, living in hot and humid climates,
malnutrition, and diabetes.
explanation: Lists crowded living environments as a risk factor for impetigo.
- name: Poor hygiene
description: >-
Poor hygiene is a recognized risk factor for impetigo; hand hygiene and
washing shared objects reduce its spread.
notes: >-
No ECTO exposure term for hygiene: an ols:ecto search for "hygiene"
returned nothing.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Risk factors for impetigo include disruptions to the skin barrier, poor
hygiene, crowded living environments, living in hot and humid climates,
malnutrition, and diabetes.
explanation: Lists poor hygiene as a risk factor for impetigo.
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Superficial Bacterial Colonization
environmental_effect: PREDISPOSES
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
description: >-
Poor hygiene favors transfer and persistence of the causative bacteria on
the skin.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Risk factors for impetigo include disruptions to the skin barrier, poor
hygiene, crowded living environments, living in hot and humid climates,
malnutrition, and diabetes.
explanation: Lists poor hygiene as a risk factor for impetigo.
- name: Hot and humid climate
description: >-
Living in hot and humid climates is a recognized risk factor for
impetigo.
exposure_term:
preferred_term: hot and humid climate
term:
id: ECTO:0010007
label: exposure to humidity
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Risk factors for impetigo include disruptions to the skin barrier, poor
hygiene, crowded living environments, living in hot and humid climates,
malnutrition, and diabetes.
explanation: Lists hot and humid climates as a risk factor for impetigo.
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Superficial Bacterial Colonization
environmental_effect: PREDISPOSES
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
description: >-
Hot, humid climates predispose to impetigo; the intermediate steps are
not specified by the source.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41839109
reference_title: "Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Risk factors for impetigo include disruptions to the skin barrier, poor
hygiene, crowded living environments, living in hot and humid climates,
malnutrition, and diabetes.
explanation: Lists hot and humid climates as a risk factor for impetigo.
Deep research results are used as seeds for research; they do not undergo the same validation as the main records and may contain errors. How we use deep research.
Address review on PR 14886: phenotype wiring, subtypes, prevalence, environment, agents · 2026-10-20T04:45:54Z · View source
Addressed the automated CHANGES_REQUESTED review. Rebound Honey-colored crusts from HP:0200042 Skin ulcer to HP:0200041 Skin erosion (impetigo erosions are superficial; ulceration defines ecthyma). Removed the duplicate Honey-Colored Crusted Erosions pathophysiology node and pointed downstream edges at the phenotype names (Nonbullous Pyogenic Epidermal Infection to Vesicles, Pustules, Honey-colored crusts; acantholysis node to Flaccid bullae and Honey-colored crusts). Split the bundled barrier/colonization trigger into Epidermal Barrier Disruption -> Superficial Bacterial Colonization and dropped the unsupported GO:0019730 antimicrobial humoral response DECREASED annotation; added atopic dermatitis evidence from PMID:31755570. Regraded PMID:21282415 (introduction sentence) to evidence_source OTHER with quote_role BACKGROUND. Added Nonbullous/Bullous has_subtypes (bullous bound to MONDO:0018182, looked up via ols:mondo), a Pustules phenotype (HP:0200039), prevalence from PMID:26317533 and PMID:33105179, a three-phase progression block, retapamulin (CHEBI:166679), ozenoxacin (CHEBI:136050, PMID:29898217) and fusidic acid (CHEBI:29013, Cochrane PMID:15106198) as topical agents, dicloxacillin (CHEBI:4511) and cephalexin (CHEBI:3534) as oral agents, EEFIC fusidic-acid and mupirocin resistance evidence (PMID:37358399, PMID:38726693), and an environmental section (scabies, crowding, poor hygiene, hot and humid climate) linked to the barrier and colonization nodes. Moved the deep-research provenance (falcon to openscientist fallback, preflight-dr SKIP, rejected report identifiers MONDO:0001366, MONDO:0005295, CHEBI:4508 and obsolete GO:0005615) out of the entry notes; it is recorded in the earlier history records. Not done: regional lymphadenopathy (no cited or cached source quotes it), APSGN/ARF split of the post-streptococcal node, and StatPearls tagging. Validation: just validate, validate-terms, count-verified-snippets (49/49) pass.
Create: Impetigo · 2026-09-29T17:54:14Z · View source
Created a new Impetigo entry for MONDO:0004592 after an ignored-file local search, origin/main search, and open GitHub issue/PR duplicate preflight found no standalone entry or in-flight claim. Deep research was requested from falcon and fell back to openscientist; all 32 report references resolved, term validation found three wrong identifiers and one obsolete GO term that were avoided, and preflight-dr skipped because MONDO records no causal human gene for this acquired infection. The entry models S. aureus and S. pyogenes as infectious agents, contact and fomite spread, the nonbullous pyogenic epidermal infection branch, the bullous exfoliative-toxin to DSG1 cleavage branch, post-streptococcal immune sequelae as a downstream outcome, vesicles, bullae, honey-colored crusts, clinical diagnosis, topical and oral antibiotic therapy, and ivermectin MDA for scabies-associated community impetigo. References were generated by the deep-research validation or preexisting cache entries; no references_cache file was hand-edited. Validation: just validate kb/disorders/Impetigo.yaml, just count-verified-snippets kb/disorders/Impetigo.yaml, just validate-terms kb/disorders/Impetigo.yaml, check-duplicate-keys, check-enum-values, check-entity-refs, check-causal-targets, and check-qualifier-terms all pass.
Disease: Impetigo | MONDO: MONDO:0004592 | Category: Infectious Disease Report date: 2026-09-29 | Evidence base: PubMed primary literature, Cochrane, GBD, clinical guidelines
Impetigo is a common, highly contagious, superficial bacterial infection of the epidermis caused predominantly by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus, GAS). It presents in two clinical forms: nonbullous impetigo (~70% of cases), caused by both S. aureus and S. pyogenes, and bullous impetigo (~30%), caused specifically by exfoliative-toxin-producing S. aureus strains. The disease is diagnosed clinically by its characteristic evolution of erythematous papules into vesicles or bullae over 4–6 days, forming pathognomonic honey-colored crusts. It is an acquired, non-genetic infectious disease — there are no causal human genes — although host factors such as skin-barrier and antimicrobial-peptide deficiency (as in atopic dermatitis and filaggrin insufficiency) create a permissive substrate for S. aureus colonization and subsequent infection.
Impetigo is overwhelmingly a disease of childhood and of poverty. More than 162 million children are affected globally at any one time, with a median childhood prevalence of 12.3%, concentrated in tropical, resource-poor, and marginalized communities. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 analysis places pyoderma/impetigo as the dominant bacterial skin disease burden (~0.41 million DALYs), with the heaviest impact in low-middle sociodemographic index (SDI) regions. Although usually mild and self-limited, streptococcal impetigo can trigger serious post-infectious sequelae — acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (APSGN) and acute rheumatic fever (ARF) — which occur at the highest documented rates in the world in remote Aboriginal Australian communities.
The mechanistic centerpiece of bullous impetigo (and its severe systemic counterpart, staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome) is the cleavage of desmoglein-1 (Dsg1), a desmosomal keratinocyte adhesion molecule, by glutamate-specific serine protease exfoliative toxins (ETA, ETB, ETD). Removal of the amino-terminal extracellular domains of Dsg1 is sufficient to initiate intraepidermal blister formation. Treatment is stratified by severity: topical antibiotics (mupirocin, retapamulin, ozenoxacin) for limited disease and oral antibiotics (dicloxacillin, cephalexin) for extensive/bullous/outbreak disease. Rising antimicrobial resistance — exemplified by the epidemic European fusidic-acid-resistant impetigo clone (EEFIC) and its emergent mupirocin-resistant variant — is a growing threat. At the community level, ivermectin-based mass drug administration (MDA) for scabies substantially reduces impetigo prevalence and its bacterial complications.
Impetigo is a common superficial bacterial infection of the skin with a global disease burden exceeding 140 million cases. It manifests in two forms with distinct proportions and microbiology. Nonbullous impetigo (~70%) is caused by both S. aureus and S. pyogenes (group A streptococcus) and is the classic "school-sores" presentation. Bullous impetigo (~30%) is caused exclusively by exfoliative-toxin-producing S. aureus strains. Diagnosis is clinical: erythematous papules progress to vesicles or bullae over 4–6 days, ultimately rupturing and drying into the characteristic honey-colored crusts.
"Impetigo can be nonbullous (70%) or bullous (30%) and is most commonly caused by group A streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus." — PMID: 41839109
"Impetigo is a common superficial bacterial infection of the skin, with a global disease burden of greater than 140 million." — PMID: 33105179
Ontology anchors: MONDO:0004592 (impetigo); ICD-10 L01; ICD-11 1B72; UBERON:0002097 (skin of body), UBERON:0001003 (skin epidermis); NCBITaxon:1280 (S. aureus), NCBITaxon:1314 (S. pyogenes).
The molecular mechanism of bullous impetigo is now precisely defined. S. aureus produces three isoforms of exfoliative toxin — ETA, ETB, and ETD — which are glutamate-specific serine proteases that cleave a single peptide bond in extracellular domains 3–4 of desmoglein-1 (Dsg1), a desmosomal cell–cell adhesion molecule expressed by keratinocytes in the superficial epidermis. This proteolysis disrupts intercellular adhesion within the granular layer, producing the superficial intraepidermal split characteristic of the disease.
"the three isoforms of ETs, i.e., ETA, ETB, and ETD, are glutamate-specific serine proteases that specifically and efficiently cleave a single peptide bond in the extracellular region of human and mouse desmoglein 1 (Dsg1), a desmosomal intercellular adhesion molecule" — PMID: 17582744
Critically, removal of the amino-terminal extracellular domains of Dsg1 is sufficient to initiate blister formation, demonstrated as early as 60 minutes after ETA injection in neonatal mice — establishing Dsg1 cleavage as the direct, proximate cause rather than a downstream correlate.
"the removal of amino-terminal extracellular domains of Dsg1 by ETs is sufficient to initiate ep[idermal blister formation]" — PMID: 20728315
The toxin genes have distinct genetic bases: ETA is phage-encoded, whereas ETB is plasmid-encoded, informing strain epidemiology and horizontal transfer of virulence.
"ETA is encoded on a phage genome and ETB is enocded on a large plasmid" — PMID: 21282415
The same molecular target (Dsg1) is shared across bullous impetigo, staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS, the disseminated toxin-mediated form), and the autoimmune blistering disease pemphigus foliaceus — a striking example of convergent pathology at a single adhesion molecule.
Ontology anchors: HGNC gene DSG1 (desmoglein-1); GO:0007156 (homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules), GO:0030057 (desmosome), GO:0008233 (peptidase activity); CL:0000312 (keratinocyte); HP:0008066 (abnormal blistering of the skin).
A systematic review of 89 studies encompassing 145,028 children established a median childhood prevalence of 12.3% (IQR 4.2–19.4%). The burden is highly unequal: low and low-middle income countries showed median prevalences of 8.4–14.5%, but the highest burden was paradoxically in underprivileged children within high-income countries (median 19.4%, IQR 3.9–43.3%). Extrapolating these prevalences yields an estimate of more than 162 million children affected at any one time, predominantly in tropical, resource-poor contexts.
"we estimate the global population of children suffering from impetigo at any one time to be in excess of 162 million, predominantly in tropical, resource-poor contexts" — PMID: 26317533
"Median childhood prevalence was 12·3% (IQR 4·2-19·4%)" — PMID: 26317533
Group A streptococcal impetigo is not merely a nuisance skin infection; it is an antecedent of serious immune-mediated sequelae. Skin infection with GAS can trigger acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (APSGN), and GAS pharyngitis or impetigo can precede acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and its long-term consequence, rheumatic heart disease. In remote Australian Aboriginal communities, the combination of scabies, impetigo, and these post-infectious complications occurs at the highest documented rates in the world.
"associated with serious long term sequelae, including invasive infection and post-infectious complications, such as acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis and acute rheumatic fever, which occurs at the highest documented rates in the world in remote Aboriginal communities" — PMID: 31630410
"Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) is an autoimmune disorder resulting from Group A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis or impetigo in children and adolescents" — PMID: 40484016
Ontology anchors: MONDO:0001366 (post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis); MONDO:0005295 (rheumatic fever); HP:0000790 (hematuria), HP:0000093 (proteinuria).
The evidence base for impetigo treatment is substantial. A Cochrane systematic review incorporated 68 randomized controlled trials with 5,578 participants reporting on 50 different treatments. Pooled analysis showed topical antibiotics were markedly superior to placebo (pooled OR 6.49, 95% CI 3.93–10.73), with topical mupirocin superior to oral erythromycin and no significant difference between mupirocin and fusidic acid.
"The total number of included trials was, thus, 68, with 5578 participants, reporting on 50 different treatments" — PMID: 22258953
"Topical antibiotics showed better cure rates than placebo (pooled odds ratio (OR) 6.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.93 to 10.73)" — PMID: 15106198
Current guidance recommends topical mupirocin 2% or retapamulin 1% for mild nonbullous and bullous disease, reserving oral agents (dicloxacillin, cephalexin) targeting both GAS and S. aureus for extensive, bullous, or outbreak disease.
"Topical mupirocin 2% ointment or retapamulin 1% ointment are the recommended initial treatments for mild, nonbullous and bullous impetigo." — PMID: 41839109
A newer non-fluorinated quinolone, ozenoxacin 1% cream, has demonstrated efficacy in randomized trials with rapid clinical and microbiological response, including activity against both MSSA and MRSA (see Evidence Base).
Ontology anchors: NCIT / CHEBI:7025 (mupirocin), retapamulin, ozenoxacin, CHEBI:4508 (dicloxacillin), cephalexin.
Because impetigo frequently follows scabies infestation (excoriation breaches the skin barrier), community-level scabies control translates into impetigo reduction. Multiple trials confirm this across settings:
| Setting | Intervention | Key result | PMID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiji (cluster RCT, n=2,051) | Ivermectin MDA | Scabies 32.1%→1.9% (RR 94%, 95% CI 83–100); impetigo declined most in ivermectin arm | 26650152 |
| Solomon Islands (AIM trial, Choiseul, ~26,000 people) | Ivermectin + azithromycin MDA | Scabies 18.7%→2.3% (RR 88%), impetigo 24.8%→6.4% (RR 74%) | 30956111 |
| Northern India (single-arm, moderate prevalence) | Ivermectin MDA | Impetigo 1.2%→0.4% (RRR 66.1%, 95% CI 7.0–87); scabies RRR 87.7% | 39431149 |
| Fiji (before-after, n=131,914) | Population MDA | SSTI hospitalisations 17% lower (IRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.94) | 35345391 |
"The prevalence declined from 32.1% to 1.9% in the ivermectin group (relative reduction, 94%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83 to 100)" — PMID: 26650152
"The incidence of hospitalisations with skin and soft tissue infections was 17% lower after the intervention compared to baseline (388 vs 467 per 100,000 person-years; incidence rate ratio 0.83, 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.94" — PMID: 35345391
"5 had impetigo (0.4%; relative risk reduction, 66.1%; 95% CI, 7.0%-87[%])" — PMID: 39431149
Resistance to first-line topical agents is escalating. The epidemic European fusidic acid-resistant impetigo clone (EEFIC) persists in Belgium: among community-onset skin/soft-tissue S. aureus isolates, 16.2% were fusidic-acid-resistant, of which 48.1% belonged to the EEFIC, disproportionately from young impetigo patients with a late-summer seasonal peak.
"Of these, 79 (16.2%) were resistant to fusidic acid, of which 38 (48.1%) belonged to the EEFIC. EEFIC isolates were mostly isolated from young patients with impetigo and showed a seasonal late summer peak." — PMID: 37358399
A mupirocin-resistant variant of this clone has since emerged and spread, threatening a second first-line topical agent:
"Emergence and spread of a mupirocin-resistant variant of the European epidemic fusidic acid-resistant impetigo clone" — PMID: 38726693
Clones resistant to both mupirocin and fusidic acid and carrying exotoxin genes are increasingly causing skin infections (PMID: 28592549), and community MRSA impetigo outbreaks have been reported (e.g., the Netherlands, PMID: 36695440).
Impetigo begins with S. aureus colonization, which is strongly modulated by host skin integrity. Keratinocytes are the principal epidermal cell orchestrating innate defense against S. aureus, which is rarely found on healthy skin but frequently colonizes atopic dermatitis (AD) skin.
"Staphylococcus aureus is only rarely found on healthy human skin, but frequently colonizes the skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients" — PMID: 28655473
AD promotes colonization through three converging mechanisms — barrier dysfunction, increased extracellular-matrix adhesins, and defective innate immunity from decreased antimicrobial peptides (AMPs):
"The mechanisms that allergic skin inflammation of AD promotes the increase of S. aureus colonization include skin barrier dysfunction, increased synthesis of the extracellular matrix adhesins for S. aureus, and defective innate immune responses due to decreased production of endogenous antimicrobial peptides" — PMID: 18163223
The relevant AMPs whose deficiency impairs cutaneous antibacterial defense are named explicitly:
"low production of the antimicrobial peptides cathelicidin LL-37 and human β-defensins" — PMID: 31836943
A filaggrin (FLG) Pro478Ser polymorphism associates with AD severity and S. aureus colonization (PMID: 27012026). Clinically, in a series of children with disseminated bullous impetigo, 92% had severe AD (PMID: 31755570) — powerful convergent evidence that barrier compromise is an upstream host-susceptibility axis.
Ontology anchors: HGNC gene FLG (filaggrin); CAMP (cathelicidin/LL-37), DEFB (β-defensins); GO:0019730 (antimicrobial humoral response), GO:0061436 (establishment of skin barrier); CL:0000312 (keratinocyte); MONDO:0004980 (atopic dermatitis).
The GBD 2019 analysis of bacterial skin diseases (BSD) quantified an age-standardized incidence of 169.72 million [165.28–175.44] and 0.41 million DALYs [0.33–0.48]. Of the two main BSD categories, pyoderma causes a significantly heavier burden than cellulitis, with the highest burden in low-middle SDI areas and the lowest in high-middle SDI regions.
"Of the two main BSD, pyoderma cause significantly much heavier burden than cellulitis. The highest burden was in the low-middle sociodemographic index (SDI) area" — PMID: 35547219
"The age-standardized incidence and age-standardized DALYs rate of BSD are: 169.72 million [165.28-175.44] and 0.41 million [0.33-0.48]" — PMID: 35547219
Trend analysis (1990–2019) shows rising age-standardized incidence and mortality rates for pyoderma/impetigo, with burden concentrated in children under 5 and the elderly and inversely related to socioeconomic development (PMID: 39805883).
Impetigo is a highly contagious, superficial bacterial infection of the epidermis, and one of the most common skin infections of childhood worldwide. Key identifiers: MONDO:0004592; ICD-10 L01 (L01.0 impetigo, L01.1 impetiginization of other dermatoses); ICD-11 1B72; MeSH D007169 ("Impetigo"); SNOMED CT 48277006. There is no OMIM entry because impetigo is not a Mendelian genetic disorder, and it is not a rare disease with a dedicated Orphanet entry. Synonyms/alternative names: impetigo contagiosa, "school sores," pyoderma (a broader term encompassing impetigo), non-bullous impetigo (impetigo vulgaris/crusted impetigo), bullous impetigo, and ecthyma (the deeper, ulcerative variant). The information in this report is derived from aggregated disease-level resources — systematic reviews, GBD modeling, and clinical cohorts — rather than from individual EHR patient records.
Causal factors: Impetigo is an infectious disease caused by Gram-positive bacteria — predominantly Staphylococcus aureus (NCBITaxon:1280) and Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus; NCBITaxon:1314). Bullous impetigo is specifically caused by exfoliative-toxin-producing S. aureus (Finding 2).
Environmental/lifestyle risk factors: warm humid tropical climate, crowding, poverty, poor hygiene and limited access to water, and — importantly — antecedent skin trauma or infestation (scabies, insect bites, minor abrasions, atopic dermatitis) that breaches the epidermal barrier. Young age (2–5 years) is the strongest demographic risk factor. Genetic risk: There are no causal or susceptibility loci for impetigo itself; however, host genetic factors influencing barrier and innate immunity — notably filaggrin (FLG) loss-of-function and the Pro478Ser polymorphism — modulate S. aureus colonization and thereby indirect risk (Finding 8).
Protective factors: intact skin barrier, adequate cutaneous antimicrobial peptide production (cathelicidin LL-37, β-defensins), good hygiene, and — at the community scale — scabies control via ivermectin MDA (Finding 6).
Gene–environment interaction: The clearest example is filaggrin deficiency (genetic) combined with environmental S. aureus exposure and AD inflammation, which together amplify colonization and infection risk (Finding 8, PMID: 18163223, PMID: 27012026).
| Phenotype | Type | Characteristics | Suggested HPO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honey-colored crusted lesions | Clinical sign | Childhood onset; mild-moderate; classic nonbullous form | HP:0011368 (epidermal thickening/crusting); HP:0200042 (skin ulcer) |
| Vesicles/pustules | Physical manifestation | Precede crusting; rupture over 4–6 days | HP:0200037 (vesicle) |
| Flaccid bullae (bullous form) | Physical manifestation | ~30% of cases; Dsg1-mediated; neonates/infants | HP:0008066 (abnormal blistering of the skin) |
| Pruritus | Symptom | Common; promotes autoinoculation/spread | HP:0000989 (pruritus) |
| Regional lymphadenopathy | Clinical sign | More common with streptococcal disease | HP:0002716 (lymphadenopathy) |
| Erythema | Clinical sign | Surrounds lesions | HP:0000988 (skin rash) |
Onset: predominantly childhood (peak 2–5 years); neonatal for bullous forms. Severity: usually mild and localized; occasionally extensive/disseminated. Progression: acute and self-limited over days to a few weeks; episodic recurrences occur with re-exposure. Quality-of-life impact: generally modest and transient (discomfort, pruritus, cosmetic and social stigma, school exclusion), but recurrent or disseminated disease and post-infectious sequelae impose substantial morbidity in endemic settings.
Impetigo has no causal human genes — it is an acquired infection, so there are no pathogenic germline variants, modifier genes, or chromosomal abnormalities in the classical Mendelian sense. The relevant molecular players are: (a) the bacterial virulence genes — eta (phage-encoded), etb (plasmid-encoded), and etd exfoliative toxin genes of S. aureus (Finding 2); and (b) the host target and susceptibility genes — DSG1 (desmoglein-1, the toxin substrate) and barrier/innate-immunity genes FLG (filaggrin), CAMP (cathelicidin), and DEFB (β-defensins) whose deficiency predisposes to colonization (Finding 8). The FLG Pro478Ser polymorphism is a documented modifier of colonization risk (PMID: 27012026). Epigenetic and chromosomal-abnormality data are not applicable to this infectious disease.
Infectious agents: S. aureus (including MRSA and MSSA) and S. pyogenes are the etiologic organisms; the exfoliative-toxin-producing S. aureus strains cause bullous disease. Environmental/lifestyle factors: heat, humidity, crowding, poor sanitation, and limited water access drive transmission; skin trauma, insect bites, and scabies infestation provide the portal of entry. There is no known role for chemical toxins, radiation, or occupational exposures. Impetigo is transmitted person-to-person by direct contact and via fomites; autoinoculation spreads lesions on the same host.
Ordered causal chain (bullous impetigo):
Branch — nonbullous streptococcal impetigo:
3b. S. pyogenes (± S. aureus) colonizes traumatized skin → local pyogenic inflammation, pustule and crust formation without Dsg1 cleavage. 4b. In susceptible hosts, nephritogenic GAS strains → trigger immune-complex-mediated APSGN; rheumatogenic strains → can trigger ARF via molecular mimicry. (downstream, immune-mediated)
Molecular/cellular detail: The upstream lesion is bacterial colonization gated by host innate immunity (keratinocytes as sensors, PMID: 28655473); the proximate mechanism is proteolytic destruction of a desmosomal adhesion molecule (protein loss-of-function of Dsg1 via extracellular cleavage). The downstream clinical event is intraepidermal blistering; the downstream systemic events (APSGN, ARF) are host immune responses to streptococcal antigens. Cell types: keratinocytes (CL:0000312), neutrophils (CL:0000775). Biological processes: GO:0007156 (cell–cell adhesion), GO:0030057 (desmosome), GO:0006508 (proteolysis), GO:0019730 (antimicrobial humoral response), GO:0006954 (inflammatory response). Subcellular compartments: desmosome/plasma membrane (GO:0030057), extracellular space (GO:0005615).
Primary organ: skin (UBERON:0002097), specifically the epidermis (UBERON:0001003) and its superficial stratum granulosum, where Dsg1 is concentrated. Tissue: keratinized stratified squamous epithelium. Cell populations: keratinocytes (CL:0000312) are the direct target; neutrophils (CL:0000775) infiltrate lesions. Common sites: exposed skin — face (especially perioral and perinasal), extremities; bullous disease favors intertriginous areas and, in neonates, the diaper region and trunk. Lateralization: typically bilateral/multifocal and asymmetric, spreading by autoinoculation. Secondary organ involvement: kidney (glomerulus) in APSGN; heart/joints/CNS in ARF; rarely deeper soft tissue (ecthyma) or systemic (SSSS, sepsis). Subcellular level: the desmosome (GO:0030057) at the keratinocyte plasma membrane.
Onset: acute; predominantly pediatric (peak 2–5 years), neonatal for bullous forms. Course: self-limited; individual lesions evolve over 4–6 days and resolve within ~2–3 weeks even without treatment, though treatment shortens the course and reduces spread. Progression: usually stable/localized but can be episodic and recurrent with re-exposure; disseminated bullous impetigo occurs in barrier-compromised (AD) children. Remission: spontaneous or treatment-induced; complete without scarring in uncomplicated disease. Critical periods: early antibiotic treatment prevents dissemination and reduces transmission; treatment does not reliably prevent APSGN (a key public-health caveat).
Epidemiology: Median childhood prevalence 12.3% (IQR 4.2–19.4%); >162 million children affected globally at any one time (PMID: 26317533); GBD 2019 age-standardized BSD incidence 169.72 million and 0.41 million DALYs, pyoderma-dominant (PMID: 35547219). Inheritance: not applicable (non-genetic infectious disease); no penetrance/expressivity/anticipation/founder-effect/carrier-frequency parameters apply. Population demographics: highest burden in tropical, low-middle-SDI regions and in marginalized populations of high-income countries (e.g., remote Aboriginal Australian communities, PMID: 31630410); children under 5 and the elderly are most affected (PMID: 39805883). Sex ratio is approximately equal. Geographic and seasonal patterns exist (warm/humid seasons; late-summer peaks for the EEFIC clone).
Diagnosis is primarily clinical, based on the characteristic honey-colored crusts (nonbullous) or flaccid bullae (bullous) (PMID: 41839109). Laboratory/microbiology: Gram stain and bacterial culture with antibiotic sensitivity testing are recommended when MRSA is suspected, when disease is recurrent/extensive, or during outbreaks, to guide therapy and detect resistant clones (EEFIC, MRSA). Wound swab of the crust base or bulla fluid is the standard specimen. Anti-DNase B and anti-streptolysin O (ASO) titers can retrospectively confirm streptococcal infection (more reliably anti-DNase B for skin GAS) in suspected APSGN. Histopathology (rarely needed): subcorneal/granular-layer split with acantholysis and neutrophils in bullous disease. Genetic and omics-based diagnostics are not applicable. Differential diagnosis: atopic dermatitis flare (frequently confused — 67% of disseminated bullous impetigo cases were initially misdiagnosed as AD flares, PMID: 31755570), herpes simplex/eczema herpeticum, varicella, scabies, contact dermatitis, tinea, and — for bullous forms — SSSS, bullous pemphigoid, and pemphigus foliaceus (which shares the Dsg1 target).
Prognosis is excellent for uncomplicated impetigo: self-limited, resolving without scarring, with high cure rates on topical therapy (Finding 5). Direct mortality is very low but non-zero at population scale (GBD records rising age-standardized pyoderma mortality, driven by resource-poor settings and complications, PMID: 39805883). Morbidity derives chiefly from: (1) transmission and recurrence; (2) local complications — ecthyma, cellulitis, abscess, lymphangitis; and (3) serious post-infectious sequelae — APSGN and ARF/rheumatic heart disease — which dominate the long-term burden in endemic communities (Finding 4). Prognostic factors: streptococcal (vs staphylococcal-only) etiology raises sequela risk; host barrier compromise (AD) predisposes to dissemination; antimicrobial resistance (EEFIC, MRSA) predicts treatment failure. Quality-of-life impact is generally transient for individuals but substantial cumulatively in high-burden populations.
Pharmacotherapy — topical (limited disease): mupirocin 2% (targets S. aureus incl. MRSA), retapamulin 1% (pleuromutilin; MSSA and S. pyogenes), and ozenoxacin 1% (non-fluorinated quinolone; MSSA, MRSA, S. pyogenes) — all superior to vehicle in RCTs (Finding 5; ozenoxacin PMID: 29898217, PMID: 25340832, PMID: 30365584). Fusidic acid is used outside the US but faces rising resistance. Oral (extensive/bullous/outbreak disease): dicloxacillin or cephalexin (cover both GAS and S. aureus); cephalosporins are recommended for disseminated bullous impetigo given high clindamycin resistance (PMID: 31755570); MRSA-directed agents (e.g., clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline) per local sensitivities. Treatment strategy follows a severity- and resistance-aware algorithm (PMID: 33538559): localized disease (<10 lesions, <36 cm²) → topical; widespread/epidemic → oral, guided by local resistance trends. Advanced/experimental/surgical therapies, pharmacogenomics, and personalized medicine are not applicable to this common bacterial infection. Adverse events are minimal for topical agents (mainly application-site pruritus). Suggested NCIT anchors: mupirocin, retapamulin, ozenoxacin, cephalexin, dicloxacillin (antibacterial-agent class terms).
Primary prevention: hygiene (handwashing, wound care), reducing crowding, treating predisposing skin conditions (scabies, AD), and — at the community scale — ivermectin-based MDA for scabies, which robustly lowers impetigo prevalence and SSTI hospitalisations (Finding 6). Secondary prevention: early diagnosis and treatment to limit spread and, in endemic settings, surveillance for APSGN/ARF. Tertiary prevention: management of established sequelae (nephritis, rheumatic heart disease). Public-health interventions: improved water/sanitation/hygiene (WASH), health education, and integrated NTD control programs. Immunization: no impetigo vaccine exists, but a group A streptococcal vaccine is in active development and could provide primordial prevention of GAS impetigo and its sequelae (PMID: 38164699). Genetic screening/counseling is not applicable.
Impetigo as clinically defined is a human disease (Homo sapiens, NCBITaxon:9606). However, the causative organisms and mechanisms have cross-species relevance: exfoliative toxins cleave both human and mouse Dsg1 (PMID: 17582744), and S. aureus causes pyoderma and impetigo-like superficial pyoderma in companion animals (dogs, via Staphylococcus pseudintermedius), giving veterinary relevance. Orthologous Dsg1 genes exist across mammals, and the mouse Dsg1 ortholog underpins neonatal-mouse toxin models (Finding 2). Zoonotic transmission is not a primary feature of human impetigo, though S. aureus strains can move between humans and animals.
The principal experimental model is the neonatal mouse (Mus musculus, NCBITaxon:10090), in which subcutaneous or intraperitoneal injection of purified exfoliative toxin (ETA) reproduces the superficial intraepidermal split within ~60 minutes, and Dsg1 domain-removal experiments established sufficiency of Dsg1 cleavage for blistering (PMID: 20728315, PMID: 17582744). This model faithfully recapitulates the molecular mechanism of bullous impetigo/SSSS (Dsg1 proteolysis → superficial blister) but does not capture the full contagious, colonization-driven natural history or the streptococcal post-infectious sequelae. Murine AD models (e.g., PMID: 32438777) and the EL4 lymphoma model (PMID: 41795941) are used to study the barrier-dysfunction/S. aureus-colonization axis relevant to impetigo susceptibility. In vitro keratinocyte cultures are used to study Dsg1 cleavage and cytokine-driven barrier-protein repression.
UPSTREAM (host susceptibility) PROXIMATE MECHANISM CLINICAL OUTCOME
-------------------------------- -------------------- ----------------
Barrier/innate-immune deficit Toxigenic S. aureus Bullous impetigo
(AD, FLG deficiency, low LL-37/ secretes ETA/ETB/ETD ── cleaves ──► (superficial blisters,
β-defensins) (glutamate-specific Dsg1 ECD3-4 honey crusts)
│ serine proteases) │
▼ ▼
S. aureus colonization ──► skin breach ──► ┌── toxigenic S. aureus ──► Dsg1 loss ──► intraepidermal split
(trauma, scabies, (portal of │
insect bite) entry) └── S. pyogenes / non-toxigenic S. aureus
│
▼
Nonbullous impetigo (pustules, crusts)
│
├──► nephritogenic GAS ──► APSGN
└──► rheumatogenic GAS ──► ARF / RHD
(immune-mediated, downstream)
The unifying narrative is a two-tier causal architecture. Tier 1 (host susceptibility, upstream): the epidermal barrier and cutaneous antimicrobial-peptide system normally exclude S. aureus; when these fail — genetically (filaggrin), inflammatorily (atopic dermatitis), or mechanically (scabies, trauma) — colonization and infection follow. Tier 2 (pathogen effector, proximate): the pathology diverges by organism. Toxigenic S. aureus executes a precise proteolytic attack on a single adhesion molecule (Dsg1) to produce bullae; streptococci and non-toxigenic staphylococci produce nonbullous pyoderma. A distinct downstream immune tier converts streptococcal skin infection into systemic sequelae (APSGN, ARF). This model explains why interventions at different tiers all work: barrier/scabies control (upstream, MDA), antibiotics (proximate, killing the organism), and future GAS vaccines (blocking the downstream sequela pathway).
| PMID | Title (abbrev.) | Role in report |
|---|---|---|
| 41839109 | Impetigo: Rapid Evidence Review | Forms/proportions, causative pathogens, first-line topical therapy |
| 33105179 | Impetigo | Superficial bacterial etiology, >140M global burden |
| 17582744 | Staphylococcal exfoliative toxins: "molecular scissors" | ET isoforms as Dsg1-cleaving serine proteases |
| 20728315 | Removal of N-terminal Dsg1 domains… | Dsg1 cleavage is sufficient for blistering |
| 21282415 | Regulatory mechanism for ET production | ETA phage-encoded, ETB plasmid-encoded |
| 26317533 | Global Epidemiology of Impetigo | 12.3% prevalence, >162M children |
| 31630410 | Skin infections in Australian Aboriginal children | APSGN/ARF sequelae, highest documented rates |
| 40484016 | Acute rheumatic fever | Impetigo as ARF antecedent |
| 15106198 | Interventions for impetigo (Cochrane) | Topical antibiotics OR 6.49 vs placebo |
| 22258953 | Interventions for impetigo (Cochrane, 68 RCTs) | Scale of evidence base |
| 26650152 | MDA for Scabies Control (Fiji) | Scabies 94% reduction; impetigo declined most |
| 30956111 | AIM trial (Solomon Islands) | Large-scale MDA: impetigo 74% reduction |
| 39431149 | Ivermectin MDA (Northern India) | Impetigo RRR 66.1% in moderate-prevalence setting |
| 35345391 | Prevention of bacterial complications (Fiji) | SSTI hospitalisations 17% lower post-MDA |
| 37358399 | Persistence of EEFIC (Belgium) | Fusidic-acid-resistant impetigo clone |
| 38726693 | Mupirocin-resistant EEFIC variant | Resistance to second first-line agent |
| 28592549 | S. aureus clone resistant to mupirocin+fusidic acid | Dual-resistant exotoxin-carrying clone |
| 28655473 | Keratinocytes as sensors vs S. aureus | S. aureus rarely on healthy skin, colonizes AD |
| 18163223 | Role of bacterial pathogens in AD | Barrier + adhesin + AMP mechanisms |
| 31836943 | Eczema Herpeticum | Names LL-37, β-defensins deficiency |
| 27012026 | Filaggrin Pro478Ser | FLG variant ↔ AD severity + S. aureus colonization |
| 31755570 | Disseminated bullous impetigo + AD | 92% severe AD; misdiagnosis; cephalosporin recommendation |
| 35547219 | Global Burden of Bacterial Skin Diseases | GBD 2019 incidence/DALYs, pyoderma-dominant |
| 39805883 | Burden of bacterial pyoderma 1990–2019 | Rising ASIR/ASMR, SDI gradient |
| 29898217 | Ozenoxacin RCT | Ozenoxacin superior to vehicle |
| 33538559 | Treatment algorithm | Resistance-aware localized-vs-widespread algorithm |
| 38164699 | Streptococcal vaccine development workshop | GAS vaccine as primordial prevention |
Evidence source types: human clinical (systematic reviews, RCTs, cohorts, GBD modeling) dominate; the Dsg1 mechanism is supported by model-organism (neonatal mouse) and in vitro work.
Report compiled from a 5-iteration autonomous investigation: 9 confirmed findings, 44 papers reviewed. Evidence spans human systematic reviews, RCTs, GBD modeling, and mechanistic model-organism/in vitro studies.
Checked with linkml-reference-validator 0.3.0rc3.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| References checked | 32 |
| Resolved | 32 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| References weighed for topical relevance | 32 |
| On topic | 25 |
| Off topic | 0 |
All extracted references resolved successfully.
Checked with linkml-term-validator 0.4.5, through the ols: adapter.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| Terms checked | 31 |
| Resolved | 30 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Obsolete | 1 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| Terms whose name was checked | 25 |
| Terms named correctly | 17 |
| Terms named as a different term | 3 |
| Terms whose name is worth a second look | 5 |
These identifiers resolve, so nothing about them looks wrong, and the ontology calls them something unrelated to what the report calls them. That usually means the identifier is not the one the sentence needs:
MONDO:0001366 (1 mention) - the report calls it "post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis"; MONDO calls it splenic sequestrationMONDO:0005295 (1 mention) - the report calls it "rheumatic fever"; MONDO calls it intermittent vascular claudicationCHEBI:4508 (1 mention) - the report calls it "dicloxacillin"; CHEBI calls it diclofenac potassiumThese terms are real but deprecated. Citing one is not a fabrication; it does mean the report is naming something the ontology has retired:
GO:0005615 (obsolete extracellular space) (1 mention) - replaced by GO:0005576The report's name for these is recognisably related to the term's own name without being one of them. A loose paraphrase reads the same way as a citation of the wrong sibling term - and so does a related synonym, which the ontology records precisely because it names something adjacent rather than the same thing - so these are listed rather than judged:
UBERON:0001003 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "skin epidermis", "epidermis"; UBERON calls it skin epidermis, and lists "epidermis" among its other namesNCBITaxon:1280 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "S. aureus", "Staphylococcus aureus"; NCBITaxon calls it Staphylococcus aureus, and lists "Micrococcus aureus" among its other namesNCBITaxon:1314 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "S. pyogenes"; NCBITaxon calls it Streptococcus pyogenesGO:0007156 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules", "cell–cell adhesion"; GO calls it homophilic cell-cell adhesionHP:0200037 (1 mention) - the report calls it "vesicle"; HP calls it Skin vesicleThe report gives these identifiers more than one name of its own:
UBERON:0001003 - called "skin epidermis", "epidermis"NCBITaxon:1280 - called "S. aureus", "Staphylococcus aureus"GO:0007156 - called "homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules", "cell–cell adhesion"