KITLG is the ligand for KIT, and keratinocytes secrete it at melanocytes sitting in the same epidermis. The disease-causing variants do not break that signal; they strengthen it. Almost all of them fall in a five-residue stretch of exon 2 - the conserved VTNNV motif at amino acids 33-37 - which is the surface KITLG presents to its receptor. Exactly how a substitution there strengthens the signal is inferred rather than measured: homology modelling suggests it raises the ligand's affinity for KIT, and no binding or receptor-activation assay on a mutant ligand has been published. What has been measured is the output. Adding the mutant soluble ligand to cells raises tyrosinase activity and roughly doubles melanin content, and a base-edited model shows the melanogenic transcriptional program, MITF included, shifting with it. Clinically that is diffuse hyperpigmentation present at or shortly after birth and spreading with age. The name carries the disease's central awkwardness. Some families have hyperpigmentation and nothing else; others have the same progressive brown background scattered with cafe-au-lait macules, lentigines, and pale macules. These were described under separate labels - FPH and FPHH - and within KITLG the labels do not track distinct lesions: Amyere and colleagues found the p.Asn36Ser allele originally reported in an FPH family segregating in two FPHH families, and mapped the whole set to the same 12q interval that dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria 2 maps to. Presence or absence of the hypopigmented component is therefore treated here as variability within one entity. What that argument does not cover is FPH1, which is a different disease with a confusingly similar name. A three-generation Chinese family with hyperpigmentation only was mapped to 19p13.1-pter, nowhere near KITLG, and its gene is still unidentified. So "familial progressive hyperpigmentation" names two things: a phenotype label used loosely across the KITLG literature, and a specific unsolved 19p locus. Only the first is folded into this entry. The pale macules are the part that is genuinely not understood, and the most interesting recent finding is that they may not be a pigmentary defect at all. In a patient whose hypopigmented macules and streaks followed the lines of Blaschko, digital PCR on lesional skin found copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity at the KITLG locus present in the pale skin and absent from blood - that is, clones that had lost the mutant allele and reverted to normal pigmentation, looking pale only against an abnormally dark background. If that generalises, "hypopigmentation" in this disease is a misnomer for patches of unaffected skin. It is a single patient, and the cafe-au-lait macules in the same person did not follow Blaschko lines and so need a different explanation.
Ask a research question about Familial Progressive Hyperpigmentation With Or Without Hypopigmentation. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
Conditions with similar clinical presentations that must be differentiated from Familial Progressive Hyperpigmentation With Or Without Hypopigmentation:
name: Familial Progressive Hyperpigmentation With Or Without Hypopigmentation
creation_date: "2026-08-28T00:00:00Z"
category: Mendelian
description: >-
KITLG is the ligand for KIT, and keratinocytes secrete it at melanocytes sitting in the
same epidermis. The disease-causing variants do not break that signal; they strengthen it.
Almost all of them fall in a five-residue stretch of exon 2 - the conserved VTNNV motif at
amino acids 33-37 - which is the surface KITLG presents to its receptor.
Exactly how a substitution there strengthens the signal is inferred rather than measured:
homology modelling suggests it raises the ligand's affinity for KIT, and no binding or
receptor-activation assay on a mutant ligand has been published. What has been measured is
the output. Adding the mutant soluble ligand to cells raises tyrosinase activity and roughly
doubles melanin content, and a base-edited model shows the melanogenic transcriptional
program, MITF included, shifting with it. Clinically that is diffuse hyperpigmentation
present at or shortly after birth and spreading with age.
The name carries the disease's central awkwardness. Some families have hyperpigmentation
and nothing else; others have the same progressive brown background scattered with
cafe-au-lait macules, lentigines, and pale macules. These were described under separate
labels - FPH and FPHH - and within KITLG the labels do not track distinct lesions: Amyere
and colleagues found the p.Asn36Ser allele originally reported in an FPH family segregating
in two FPHH families, and mapped the whole set to the same 12q interval that dyschromatosis
universalis hereditaria 2 maps to. Presence or absence of the hypopigmented component is
therefore treated here as variability within one entity.
What that argument does not cover is FPH1, which is a different disease with a confusingly
similar name. A three-generation Chinese family with hyperpigmentation only was mapped to
19p13.1-pter, nowhere near KITLG, and its gene is still unidentified. So "familial
progressive hyperpigmentation" names two things: a phenotype label used loosely across the
KITLG literature, and a specific unsolved 19p locus. Only the first is folded into this
entry.
The pale macules are the part that is genuinely not understood, and the most interesting
recent finding is that they may not be a pigmentary defect at all. In a patient whose
hypopigmented macules and streaks followed the lines of Blaschko, digital PCR on lesional
skin found copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity at the KITLG locus present in the pale skin
and absent from blood - that is, clones that had lost the mutant allele and reverted to
normal pigmentation, looking pale only against an abnormally dark background. If that
generalises, "hypopigmentation" in this disease is a misnomer for patches of unaffected
skin. It is a single patient, and the cafe-au-lait macules in the same person did not
follow Blaschko lines and so need a different explanation.
disease_term:
preferred_term: Familial progressive hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation
term:
id: MONDO:0007771
label: hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation, familial progressive
synonyms:
- FPHH
- familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation
- hyperpigmentation, familial progressive, 2
- FPH2
- melanosis universalis hereditaria
parents:
- Skin Disorder
- Genodermatosis
external_assertions:
- name: OMIM hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation, familial progressive
source: OMIM
assertion_type: disease_record
external_id: OMIM:145250
url: https://omim.org/entry/145250
description: >-
The OMIM phenotype entry for the KITLG disease, and the term MONDO:0007771 cross-references.
OMIM places the family Wang and colleagues reported as "FPH" - hyperpigmentation only, KITLG
p.Asn36Ser - under this entry rather than under its separate FPH1 entry, which is the
resource-level statement that the hyper-only presentation belongs to the KITLG entity.
- name: OMIM hyperpigmentation, familial progressive, 1 (FPH1)
source: OMIM
assertion_type: disease_record
external_id: OMIM:614233
url: https://omim.org/entry/614233
description: >-
The separate OMIM entry for the 19p13.1-pter locus with an unidentified gene. MONDO:0013648
cross-references this, which is why that term is treated here as a differential rather than
as a broader synonym of this entry. Recorded because the label "familial progressive
hyperpigmentation" is used for both this locus and, loosely, for the KITLG disease.
- name: Orphanet familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation
source: Orphanet
assertion_type: disease_record
external_id: ORPHA:280628
url: https://www.orpha.net/en/disease/detail/280628
description: >-
The Orphanet concept for the KITLG disease. MONDO:0017239 cross-references it and is placed
as a child of MONDO:0007771; on the reading taken here the two MONDO terms describe the same
entity from two resources rather than a disease and its subtype.
inheritance:
- name: Autosomal dominant
inheritance_term:
preferred_term: Autosomal dominant inheritance
term:
id: HP:0000006
label: Autosomal dominant inheritance
description: >-
Heterozygous KITLG variants segregate with the phenotype through multi-generation
pedigrees; the founding report followed a six-generation Chinese family. Penetrance has
been described as reduced, and de novo cases occur - one exon-4 variant was shown to be
de novo, and a sporadic patient with unaffected parents has been reported carrying the
recurrent p.Thr34Ile allele.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19375057
reference_title: Gain-of-function mutation of KIT ligand on melanin synthesis causes familial
progressive hyperpigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: This mutant "G" allele cosegregated perfectly with affected, but not with unaffected,
members of the FPH family.
explanation: Cosegregation of the heterozygous KITLG allele with affected status across
a six-generation pedigree, which is the dominant-inheritance evidence.
- reference: PMID:21368769
reference_title: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation (FPHH) is thought to be an autosomal
dominant disorder with reduced penetrance.
explanation: States the dominant mode and flags reduced penetrance; graded PARTIAL because
the sentence reports the prevailing view rather than a penetrance measurement.
pathophysiology:
- name: KITLG Gain-of-Function Variant in the Receptor-Binding Motif
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
A heterozygous missense substitution in KITLG, almost always within the conserved VTNNV
motif spanning amino acids 33-37 in exon 2. The motif lies on a conserved beta-strand
that forms the interface with the KIT receptor, so a substitution there alters the
ligand-receptor contact rather than destabilising the protein. Reported alleles include
p.Val33Ala, p.Thr34Pro, p.Thr34Ile, p.Asn35Ile, p.Asn35Lys, p.Asn36Ser, and p.Lys38Thr -
the last extending the hotspot by one residue, so it is sometimes written VTNNVK, 33-38. Alleles
outside the motif are also reported: p.Glu113Lys (c.337G>A, exon 4), described as lying at
a different ligand-receptor interaction site; p.Ser78Leu, reported as novel with no stated
structural interpretation; and a pair of exon-4 substitutions at c.329A.
genetic_context:
gene:
preferred_term: KITLG
term:
id: hgnc:6343
label: KITLG
functional_impact_category: GAIN_OF_FUNCTION
allele_type: missense
variant_origin: GERMLINE
zygosity: HETEROZYGOUS
molecular_functions:
- preferred_term: stem cell factor receptor binding
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0005173
label: stem cell factor receptor binding
cell_types:
- preferred_term: keratinocyte
term:
id: CL:0000312
label: keratinocyte
downstream:
- target: Enhanced KITLG-KIT Signaling in Epidermal Melanocytes
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Somatic Reversion of the KITLG Locus in Skin
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
description: >-
Reversion is loss of this germline allele in a somatic clone, so the variant is what
the reversion event acts on. The intermediates - what triggers mitotic recombination
at this locus, and why it appears to happen often enough to be visible - are unknown.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19375057
reference_title: Gain-of-function mutation of KIT ligand on melanin synthesis causes familial
progressive hyperpigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Mutation profiling of positional candidate genes detected a heterozygous transversion
(c. 107A-->G) in exon 2 of the KIT ligand (KITLG) gene, predicted to result in the substitution
of a serine residue for an asparagine residue at codon 36 (p.N-->S).
explanation: The founding variant, identified by positional cloning after linkage to 12q21.31-q23.1.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Most of the FPHH-causing mutations in KITLG are clustered within the conserved
VTNNV motif (amino acids 33–37) in exon 2, and a mutated VTNNV domain may increase the
affinity of KITLG to the c-Kit receptor, suggesting that the mutation causes a downstream
gain-of-function effect.
explanation: Locates the mutational hotspot. Note the source's own hedging - the affinity
increase is offered as what a mutated motif "may" do, on the basis of homology modelling,
not as a measured binding result.
- reference: PMID:21368769
reference_title: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: All three mutations were located in a conserved β-strand in KITLG, suggesting
its important role in the activation of the KITLG receptor c-Kit.
explanation: Independent confirmation that the FPHH alleles cluster on the conserved receptor-contact
beta-strand.
- reference: PMID:32189379
reference_title: Novel mutation in the KITLG gene in familial progressive hyperpigmentation
with or without hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: We have now identified a novel KITLG mutation, c.337G>A (p.Glu113Lys), in FPHH
which is located within another ligand-receptor interaction site.
explanation: Establishes that pathogenic alleles are not confined to the VTNNV motif but
do remain at ligand-receptor contact surfaces.
- name: Enhanced KITLG-KIT Signaling in Epidermal Melanocytes
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
mechanism_confidence: PROVISIONAL
description: >-
Keratinocyte-derived KITLG binds KIT on neighbouring epidermal melanocytes, dimerising
the receptor and activating its tyrosine kinase. That this axis is rate-limiting for
epidermal pigment is well supported: adding soluble KITLG to grafted human skin darkens it,
and blocking either KITLG or KIT depletes melanocytes.
What is not established is the step this node names. The proposal is that the mutant ligand
engages KIT more effectively than wild type, and the sources state it as a possibility
rather than a finding - the affinity increase is inferred from homology modelling of the
substituted residues, and no binding assay, receptor phosphorylation measurement, or
dose-response comparison of mutant against wild-type ligand has been published. Every
functional experiment in this literature reads out melanin or transcription downstream, not
receptor engagement itself. The node is graded PROVISIONAL for that reason, and the evidence
attached below characterises the wild-type axis rather than the mutant's behaviour on it.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: Kit signaling pathway
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0038109
label: Kit signaling pathway
cell_types:
- preferred_term: epidermal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:2000000
label: epidermal melanocyte
downstream:
- target: Upregulated MITF-Driven Melanogenic Transcription
causal_link_type: DIRECT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39269165
reference_title: A case of familial progressive hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation
presenting with hypopigmented striae along the lines of Blaschko.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: KITLG, expressed by keratinocytes, binds to KIT on melanocytes, stimulating melanogenesis.
Disturbances in the KITLG-KIT interaction result in diffuse hyperpigmentation in FPHH.
explanation: States the cell-to-cell signalling axis and attributes the diffuse hyperpigmentation
to its disturbance.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: By KITLG binding, KIT dimerizes and initiates diverse cellular responses and plays
a crucial role in the development and maintenance of the melanocyte lineage in adult
skin.
explanation: The receptor-activation step and its role in maintaining the adult epidermal
melanocyte lineage.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: Injection of the soluble form of sKITLG resulted in hyperpigmentation of the grafted
skin tissue
explanation: The gain-of-pigment arm, done in human skin grafted onto a host animal, which is
why it is graded MODEL_ORGANISM. Note the review is summarising work it cites rather than
reporting its own data.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: injection of the KIT- or KITLG-blocking antibodies into the explanted human skin
led to a loss of melanocytes
explanation: The loss-of-signal arm, done in explanted human skin, hence IN_VITRO. Split from
the grafted-skin item above so each carries a single evidence_source. Together the two show
the axis is rate-limiting for epidermal pigmentation in both directions.
- name: Upregulated MITF-Driven Melanogenic Transcription
biological_scale: CELLULAR
mechanism_confidence: PROVISIONAL
description: >-
Downstream of the strengthened KIT signal the melanocyte's melanogenic transcriptional
program is upregulated, with MITF - the master regulator of the melanocyte lineage and of
the pigment-synthesis genes it controls - the most prominently affected node. This step
is graded PROVISIONAL rather than ESTABLISHED because the transcriptomic evidence comes from
one base-edited cell model of one exon-4 allele, not from patient melanocytes or from the
common VTNNV-motif alleles.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: positive regulation of melanin biosynthetic process
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0048023
label: positive regulation of melanin biosynthetic process
cell_types:
- preferred_term: epidermal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:2000000
label: epidermal melanocyte
downstream:
- target: Increased Tyrosinase Activity
causal_link_type: DIRECT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41779177
reference_title: New variant in KITLG shapes the pathogenesis of familial progressive hyper-
and hypo-pigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: For de novo c.329 A > G mutation, results showed that the mutation broadly affected
the transcription and translation of genes responsible for melanin synthesis, especially
the melanin gene MITF.
explanation: RNA-sequencing of a base-edited cell model showing the mutant allele reshapes
melanin-synthesis gene expression with MITF most affected.
- name: Increased Tyrosinase Activity
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
mechanism_confidence: PROVISIONAL
description: >-
The rate-limiting enzyme of melanogenesis runs faster. Tyrosinase activity was
significantly higher in cells exposed to the mutant soluble ligand than in cells exposed
to wild type. Graded PROVISIONAL rather than ESTABLISHED: this is one 2009 experiment on
one allele, and it was done by adding recombinant soluble ligand to A375 melanoma cells
rather than in melanocytes expressing the variant from its own locus, so the measurement
stands but has not been independently reproduced or shown in a physiological cell context.
molecular_functions:
- preferred_term: tyrosinase activity
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0004503
label: tyrosinase activity
cell_types:
- preferred_term: epidermal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:2000000
label: epidermal melanocyte
downstream:
- target: Increased Melanocyte Melanin Content
causal_link_type: DIRECT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19375057
reference_title: Gain-of-function mutation of KIT ligand on melanin synthesis causes familial
progressive hyperpigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: Consistent with this result, the tyrosinase activity was significantly increased
by mutant sKITLGN36S compared to wild-type control.
explanation: The enzymatic measurement - tyrosinase is the rate-limiting step the increased
melanin flux passes through.
- name: Increased Melanocyte Melanin Content
biological_scale: CELLULAR
mechanism_confidence: PROVISIONAL
description: >-
The melanocyte accumulates more pigment. Melanin content roughly doubled in cells exposed
to the mutant ligand relative to wild type, which is the closest thing in this literature
to a direct functional demonstration that the variant is a gain of function on melanin
synthesis rather than a rare allele that merely segregates. It carries the same caveat as
the tyrosinase measurement above - one paper, one allele, exogenous ligand on a melanoma
line - which is why it is PROVISIONAL.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: melanin biosynthetic process
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0042438
label: melanin biosynthetic process
cell_types:
- preferred_term: epidermal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:2000000
label: epidermal melanocyte
downstream:
- target: Progressive Epidermal Melanin Accumulation
causal_link_type: DIRECT
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19375057
reference_title: Gain-of-function mutation of KIT ligand on melanin synthesis causes familial
progressive hyperpigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: Function analysis of the soluble form of sKITLG revealed that mutant sKITLGN36S
increased the content of the melanin by 109% compared with the wild-type sKITLG in human
A375 melanoma cells.
explanation: The quantitative melanin-content measurement, including the cell system it was
made in.
- name: Progressive Epidermal Melanin Accumulation
biological_scale: TISSUE
mechanism_confidence: ESTABLISHED
description: >-
Sustained overproduction of melanin across the epidermis produces the clinical lesion: a
diffuse, partly blotchy brown background present at or shortly after birth that enlarges
and multiplies with age rather than remitting. The distribution is generalised - face,
neck, trunk, and limbs, and frequently the palms, soles, and oral mucosa - and adnexal
structures are spared.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: pigmentation
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0043473
label: pigmentation
downstream:
- target: Progressive Diffuse Hyperpigmentation
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Lentigines
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Oral Mucosal Pigmentation
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Somatic Reversion of the KITLG Locus in Skin
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
description: >-
The hyperpigmented background is what makes a reverted clone visible at all - a patch of
normally pigmented skin only reads as hypopigmented against it. This edge records that
dependency rather than a causal push toward reversion.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19375057
reference_title: Gain-of-function mutation of KIT ligand on melanin synthesis causes familial
progressive hyperpigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Familial progressive hyperpigmentation (FPH) is an autosomal-dominantly inherited
disorder characterized by hyperpigmented patches in the skin, present in early infancy
and increasing in size and number with age.
explanation: The defining clinical course - congenital or early-infantile onset with progression
rather than stability.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: hyperpigmented lesions that are intermixed with multiple café-au-lait spots, hypopigmented
maculae and lentigines that are located on the face, neck, trunk and limbs and frequently
on the palms, soles and oral mucosa
explanation: The anatomical distribution, including acral and mucosal involvement.
- name: Somatic Reversion of the KITLG Locus in Skin
biological_scale: CELLULAR
mechanism_confidence: HYPOTHETICAL
description: >-
A candidate explanation for the hypopigmented component, and one that would make the
"hypo" in the disease name a misnomer. In a patient with hypopigmented macules and striae
distributed along the lines of Blaschko, digital PCR found copy-neutral loss of
heterozygosity at the KITLG locus in DNA from the pale lesion but not in blood -
consistent with clones that lost the mutant allele, reverted to ordinary KITLG-KIT
signalling, and appear pale only by contrast with the surrounding hyperpigmented skin.
Blaschko-linear distribution is the expected pattern for a clonal somatic event in
keratinocyte or melanocyte lineages, which is what makes the observation more than a
coincidence.
Graded HYPOTHETICAL: this is a single patient carrying a single allele, and the
cafe-au-lait macules in the same individual did not follow Blaschko lines and superimposed
on the hypopigmented striae, so they require a separate mechanism this one does not
supply. The general question is explicitly open in the literature.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: epidermal melanocyte
term:
id: CL:2000000
label: epidermal melanocyte
downstream:
- target: Hypopigmented Macules and Streaks
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39269165
reference_title: A case of familial progressive hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation
presenting with hypopigmented striae along the lines of Blaschko.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Digital polymerase chain reaction analysis of the DNA from skin and blood tissues
indicated a copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity at the KITLG locus, only in the hypopigmented
macule. These findings suggest that the hypopigmented macules might result from revertant
mosaicism.
explanation: The lesion-restricted copy-neutral LOH and the revertant-mosaicism interpretation
drawn from it.
- reference: PMID:39269165
reference_title: A case of familial progressive hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation
presenting with hypopigmented striae along the lines of Blaschko.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Conversely, café-au-lait spots do not follow the lines of Blaschko and can superimpose
on the hypopigmented striae, indicating a distinct pathogenesis.
explanation: The authors' own limitation - reversion explains the pale macules but not the
cafe-au-lait macules, so it is not a unified account of the dyspigmentation.
- reference: PMID:39269165
reference_title: A case of familial progressive hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation
presenting with hypopigmented striae along the lines of Blaschko.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: However, the mechanisms behind hypopigmented macule formation remain unclear.
explanation: States that the hypopigmentation mechanism is unresolved, which is why this
node is graded HYPOTHETICAL rather than PROVISIONAL.
- reference: PMID:29186243
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation: a report
on a Chinese family and evidence for genetic heterogeneity.'
supports: REFUTE
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: The staining for S100 and HMB45 were almost completely negative in the hypopigmentation
areas.
explanation: The prediction this node makes is that pale skin holds revertant melanocytes
pigmenting normally - which requires melanocytes to be present. Here both a general and a
melanocyte-specific marker are almost absent from hypopigmented skin, meaning the pale
patches lack melanocytes rather than containing well-behaved ones. Two limits on how far
it cuts - it is a different family, and one in which no KITLG mutation was found, so it may
describe a different route to the same clinical picture, and no one has done this staining
on a lesion shown to carry copy-neutral LOH. It is recorded as REFUTE because it contradicts
the node's prediction on its face, and it is a substantial part of why the node is graded
HYPOTHETICAL.
phenotypes:
- category: Dermatologic
name: Progressive Diffuse Hyperpigmentation
frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
diagnostic: true
description: >-
The defining and universal feature. Diffuse, partly blotchy hyperpigmented patches
present at birth or in early infancy, enlarging and increasing in number with age across
face, neck, trunk, and limbs, and frequently involving palms, soles, and oral mucosa.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Progressive hyperpigmentation
term:
id: HP:0007505
label: Progressive hyperpigmentation
clinical_course: PROGRESSIVE
onset:
onset_category: CONGENITAL
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19375057
reference_title: Gain-of-function mutation of KIT ligand on melanin synthesis causes familial
progressive hyperpigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: characterized by hyperpigmented patches in the skin, present in early infancy
and increasing in size and number with age
explanation: The onset and progression that the phenotype name asserts.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Generalized hyper- and hypopigmentation with irregular patches was found at birth,
and the patches (0.2–0.8 cm) progressed successively over her face, neck, trunk and limbs
with age.
explanation: A worked pedigree description of congenital onset and progressive spread, with
lesion sizes and distribution.
- category: Dermatologic
name: Mixed Hypo- and Hyperpigmentation
description: >-
The feature the disease name qualifies as optional. Scattered pale macules on the
progressive brown background, ranging from well-isolated patches on normal-appearing skin
to a confetti-like or mottled pattern. Families in which no hypopigmented feature is
present were historically separated as FPH; the same KITLG alleles are found in both, so
this is presentation variability within one entity rather than a second disease.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Mixed hypo- and hyperpigmentation of the skin
term:
id: HP:0009123
label: Mixed hypo- and hyperpigmentation of the skin
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21368769
reference_title: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Clinical signs consist of progressive diffuse, partly blotchy hyperpigmented lesions,
multiple café-au-lait spots, intermingled with scattered hypopigmented-appearing maculae,
and lentigines.
explanation: The full dyspigmentation picture, including the hypopigmented component.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Dispigmentation patterns can range from well-isolated café-au-lait/hypopigmented
patches on a background of normal-appearing skin to a confetti-like or mottled appearance
explanation: The morphological range of the mixed pattern.
- category: Dermatologic
name: Hypopigmented Macules and Streaks
description: >-
Discrete pale macules, and in at least one reported patient hypopigmented striae
following the lines of Blaschko. The Blaschko-linear form is the observation that raised
revertant mosaicism as the underlying mechanism.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Hypopigmented macule
term:
id: HP:0020073
label: Hypopigmented macule
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39269165
reference_title: A case of familial progressive hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation
presenting with hypopigmented striae along the lines of Blaschko.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: the patient showed multiple hypopigmented macules and striae along the lines of
Blaschko
explanation: Documents both the discrete macules and the Blaschko-linear striae.
- category: Dermatologic
name: Cafe-au-lait Macules
description: >-
Multiple cafe-au-lait macules superimposed on the hyperpigmented background. Their
presence is the main reason FPHH is confused with neurofibromatosis type 1 and with
Legius syndrome, and in the one patient studied for it they did not share the
Blaschko-linear distribution of the pale lesions, implying a separate pathogenesis.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Cafe-au-lait spot
term:
id: HP:0000957
label: Cafe-au-lait spot
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21368769
reference_title: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: multiple café-au-lait spots, intermingled with scattered hypopigmented-appearing
maculae, and lentigines
explanation: Cafe-au-lait macules as a described component of the FPHH phenotype.
- reference: PMID:39152874
reference_title: A novel KITLG mutation causes familial progressive hyperpigmentation and
hypopigmentation with multiple café-au-lait macules.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: On examination, multiple diffuse lentigines were observed on his face, trunk, and
extremities, accompanied by multiple CALMs and scattered hypopigmented macules of varying
sizes
explanation: A single-patient examination finding recording cafe-au-lait macules alongside
lentigines and hypopigmented macules, and their appearance after the initial hyperpigmentation.
- category: Dermatologic
name: Lentigines
description: >-
Small, sharply demarcated dark macules scattered among the other lesions. The one source
that ranks the lesions puts lentigines ahead of cafe-au-lait macules, which it calls only
sometimes present; neither is quantified, so no frequency band is asserted here.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Multiple lentigines
term:
id: HP:0001003
label: Multiple lentigines
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: hypopigmented spots, lentigines and sometimes Cafe-au-lait spots (CALs)
explanation: Lentigines listed among the characteristic lesions, with cafe-au-lait macules
noted as only sometimes present.
- category: Dermatologic
name: Oral Mucosal Pigmentation
description: >-
Pigmentation of the oral mucosa alongside the cutaneous lesions. It is the feature most
likely to bring a patient to a dentist rather than a dermatologist, and its presence is
part of why Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and Addison disease sit in the differential. No
frequency band is given: the KITLG series describe mucosal involvement as frequent while
the same paper reports a pedigree with no mucosal disease, and there is no denominator
anywhere in this literature to adjudicate between them.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Intra-oral hyperpigmentation
term:
id: HP:0010284
label: Intra-oral hyperpigmentation
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: located on the face, neck, trunk and limbs and frequently on the palms, soles and
oral mucosa
explanation: Oral mucosal involvement in a molecularly confirmed KITLG series - the primary
support, since the case report below was never sequenced.
- reference: PMID:22577587
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyperpigmentation: a case report.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: hyperpigmented patches in the skin and mucous membranes, present in early infancy,
and increase in size and number with age
explanation: Records mucous-membrane involvement as part of the characteristic distribution.
Graded PARTIAL because this 2012 case report predates molecular testing in the patient and
carries no KITLG genotype, so it cannot be tied to this entry's entity with certainty.
- reference: PMID:22577587
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyperpigmentation: a case report.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: who presented with a peculiar progressive oral pigmentation disorder
explanation: A worked case in which oral pigmentation was the presenting complaint. Same
caveat - clinically diagnosed "FPH", not genotyped.
histopathology:
- name: Increased epidermal melanin, maximal in the basal layer
description: >-
Biopsy of hyperpigmented skin shows a striking increase in melanin throughout the
epidermis, most marked in the basal cell layer, with hypopigmented-area biopsies showing
lower epidermal melanin. Histology is supportive rather than diagnostic.
Immunohistochemistry in the same biopsies goes further than melanin quantity, and it
points somewhere this entry's pathograph does not. S100 and HMB45 staining of the
hyperpigmented areas was read as showing increased melanocytes as well as increased
melanin - that is, more pigment cells, not only busier ones. The pathograph here models
per-melanocyte hyperfunction, because that is what the KITLG functional experiments
measure; the histology is evidence for the other reading. Both are recorded, and the
conflict is left open rather than resolved by preference.
One caution on how far any of this can be pushed: the family it comes from was screened
across the entire KITLG coding region and had no mutation. So it describes the FPHH
clinical phenotype rather than the KITLG mechanism specifically, and it is cited here for
the tissue-level finding and, separately, as evidence of locus heterogeneity.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29186243
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation: a report
on a Chinese family and evidence for genetic heterogeneity.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: skin biopsy specimens from the hyperpigmented areas showed a striking increase in
melanin throughout the epidermis, especially in the basal cell layer, and staining of hypopigmented
area specimens displayed lower levels of melanin in the epidermis
explanation: The histological correlate of both lesion types in one patient.
- reference: PMID:29186243
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation: a report
on a Chinese family and evidence for genetic heterogeneity.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: These darkly stained regions indicated a large number of melanocytes and melanin
explanation: Immunohistochemical evidence that hyperpigmented skin carries more melanocytes,
not merely more pigment per melanocyte - the observation that puts melanocyte hyperplasia
in play against the per-melanocyte-hyperfunction model this entry's pathograph uses. The
paper itself notes S100 is not melanocyte-specific and may also stain Langerhans cells,
which is why the HMB45 result below matters.
- reference: PMID:29186243
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation: a report
on a Chinese family and evidence for genetic heterogeneity.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: HMB45 staining of the hyperpigmented tissue was similar to that of S100 in the same
area with increased melanocytes and melanin
explanation: The same increased-melanocyte finding with a melanocyte-specific marker, which
answers the S100 specificity caveat above.
genetic:
- name: KITLG
gene_term:
preferred_term: KITLG
term:
id: hgnc:6343
label: KITLG
relationship_type: CAUSATIVE
variant_origin: GERMLINE
notes: >-
Two things about this gene make the entry's scope decisions turn on it.
First, direction of effect determines which KITLG disease a patient has. The FPHH alleles
are heterozygous gain-of-function substitutions at the receptor-binding surface, and they
cause too much pigment. Biallelic KITLG variants do the opposite: loss-of-function pairs
have been proposed to cause generalized hypomelanosis, and residual-function pairs a
variable auditory-pigmentary disorder resembling Waardenburg syndrome type 2 or
piebaldism. That recessive disorder is a separate entity, not a severity band of this one,
and it is kept out of this entry.
Second, the same gene and in one case the same allele underlie concepts that are carried as
distinct terms. p.Asn36Ser was reported first in a family labelled FPH - hyperpigmentation
only - and then found segregating in two FPHH families, and the FPHH locus overlaps that of
dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria 2. This entry therefore treats the hyper-only and
hyper-plus-hypo presentations as one KITLG disease with a variable hypopigmented component.
This argument is confined to KITLG and does not extend to FPH1 (OMIM:614233), which is a
separate 19p13.1-pter locus with no identified gene.
Locus heterogeneity is real and unresolved: FPHH families without any KITLG mutation have
been reported, so a negative KITLG result does not exclude the clinical diagnosis.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21368769
reference_title: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: 'In aggregate, mutations in a single gene cause various pigmentation disorders:
FPH, FPHH, and likely DUH2.'
explanation: The single-gene basis spanning the historically separate FPH, FPHH, and DUH2
concepts - the evidence for treating FPH and FPHH as one entry.
- reference: PMID:21368769
reference_title: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: A reported FPH substitution was observed in two FPHH families, and two, to our
knowledge, previously unreported substitutions, p.Val33Ala and p.Thr34Pro, cosegregated
with FPHH in two separate families.
explanation: The same allele in both phenotypes, which is the specific observation that
undermines an FPH/FPHH split.
- reference: PMID:21566575
reference_title: 'The genetic determination of skin pigmentation: KITLG and the KITLG/c-Kit
pathway as key players in the onset of human familial pigmentary diseases.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Amyere et al. suggest that different pigmentary diseases can result from the same
mutation or different mutations in the same gene
explanation: An independent commentary drawing the same conclusion - that phenotypic labels
here do not track distinct genetic lesions.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: However, many FPHH families without KITLG mutations have been identified, indicating
additional locus heterogeneity for this disorder
explanation: Documents that KITLG does not account for all clinically diagnosed FPHH.
- reference: PMID:29186243
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation: a report
on a Chinese family and evidence for genetic heterogeneity.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Analysis revealed that its members did not have any mutations of the KITLG gene,
which provided evidence for genetic heterogeneity of this genodermatosis.
explanation: A worked KITLG-negative FPHH family - the concrete instance behind the locus
heterogeneity claim, and the reason a negative KITLG result cannot exclude the diagnosis.
- reference: PMID:35543077
reference_title: Biallelic KITLG variants lead to a distinct spectrum of hypomelanosis and
sensorineural hearing loss.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: We provide consolidating evidence that biallelic KITLG variants cause a distinct
auditory-pigmentary disorder.
explanation: Establishes the biallelic disorder as a separate entity, supporting its exclusion
from this entry.
- reference: PMID:35543077
reference_title: Biallelic KITLG variants lead to a distinct spectrum of hypomelanosis and
sensorineural hearing loss.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Pathogenic variants in KITLG, a crucial protein involved in pigmentation and neural
crest cell migration, cause non-syndromic hearing loss, Waardenburg syndrome type 2, familial
progressive hyperpigmentation and familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation, all
of which are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.
explanation: The full allelic series at KITLG, which is what the differential for this entry
has to be drawn against.
differential_diagnoses:
- name: Dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria 2
description: >-
The nearest neighbour and the hardest to separate. DUH2 maps to the same 12q interval as
FPHH, is phenotypically and histologically close to FPH, and Amyere and colleagues judged
it likely to be KITLG-related as well. The distinction may not survive further genetics.
distinguishing_features:
- Maps to the same 12q interval as FPHH
- Separation currently rests on clinical and histological description rather than on a molecular criterion
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21368769
reference_title: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: We performed a genome-wide linkage analysis in seven families with FPHH, and identified
linkage on 12q21.12-q22, which overlaps with the DUH2 locus.
explanation: The shared locus that makes DUH2 the primary differential.
- name: Legius syndrome
description: >-
Presents with familial cafe-au-lait macules and skin-fold freckling and is caused by
SPRED1 variants. It is raised in the differential because the cafe-au-lait component of
FPHH looks similar; the progressive diffuse brown background of FPHH is not part of
Legius syndrome.
distinguishing_features:
- Caused by SPRED1 variants rather than KITLG
- Skin-fold freckling rather than a progressive diffuse hyperpigmented background
evidence:
- reference: PMID:21368769
reference_title: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: It also differs from the Legius syndrome, characterized by familial café-au-lait
spots and skin fold freckling, caused by mutations in SPRED1.
explanation: The authors' own differential, naming the distinguishing gene and features.
- name: Familial progressive hyperpigmentation 1 (FPH1)
description: >-
The name collision that matters most for this entry. FPH1 is a dominantly inherited
hyperpigmentation-only phenotype mapped by genome screening to 19p13.1-pter in a
three-generation Chinese family. Its causal gene has never been identified, and the
interval is unrelated to KITLG at 12q. Clinically the two are close - patches present at
birth or in early infancy that enlarge and multiply with age - so the separation rests on
the locus rather than on the skin.
distinguishing_features:
- Maps to 19p13.1-pter, not to the KITLG interval at 12q
- Causal gene unidentified, so it cannot be confirmed by KITLG sequencing
- No hypopigmented component reported
evidence:
- reference: PMID:16709486
reference_title: Linkage of a locus determining familial progressive hyperpigmentation (FPH)
to chromosome 19p13.1-pter in a Chinese family.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: we identified a locus linked to chromosome 19p13.1-pter responsible for FPH, spanning
45.48 cM between D19S593 and 19pter
explanation: The linkage result establishing FPH1 as a locus distinct from KITLG at 12q.
- reference: PMID:16709486
reference_title: Linkage of a locus determining familial progressive hyperpigmentation (FPH)
to chromosome 19p13.1-pter in a Chinese family.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Although previous studies showed that FPH is a monogenic trait, the genetic basis
for this disease is unknown.
explanation: Confirms the FPH1 gene was unidentified, which is why the entity cannot be resolved
by molecular testing.
- name: Cafe-au-lait macule and lentigines syndromes
description: >-
When the cafe-au-lait and lentigine component is prominent, FPHH is confused with the
RASopathy and neurocutaneous disorders that present with multiple cafe-au-lait macules -
neurofibromatosis type 1, LEOPARD syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex. Legius
syndrome belongs to this group too and is listed separately above, because the FPHH
literature raises it by name. All of these have extracutaneous features that the
genotyped FPHH pedigrees do not report.
distinguishing_features:
- Progressive diffuse hyperpigmented background, which none of these disorders produces
- No extracutaneous involvement in FPHH, whereas each of these is a systemic disorder
- Different causal genes (NF1, SPRED1, PTPN11, TSC1/TSC2) rather than KITLG
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39152874
reference_title: A novel KITLG mutation causes familial progressive hyperpigmentation and
hypopigmentation with multiple café-au-lait macules.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: our patient exhibited a relatively large number of CALMs and lentigines which require
differentiation from pigmentary diseases that also manifest with multiple CALMs and lentigines,
such as neurofibromatosis type 1, legius syndrome, LEOPARD syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis
complex
explanation: The authors' stated differential for an FPHH patient in whom the cafe-au-lait
and lentigine component dominated.
- name: Biallelic KITLG auditory-pigmentary disorder
description: >-
The recessive counterpart at the same gene. Where FPHH is heterozygous gain of function
causing excess pigment, biallelic variants cause hypomelanosis - including a
sock-and-glove-like symmetric distribution and generalized hypomelanosis - together with
sensorineural hearing loss.
distinguishing_features:
- Biallelic rather than heterozygous KITLG variants
- Hypomelanosis rather than progressive hyperpigmentation
- Sensorineural hearing loss, which FPHH does not cause
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35543077
reference_title: Biallelic KITLG variants lead to a distinct spectrum of hypomelanosis and
sensorineural hearing loss.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: we expand the known hypomelanosis spectrum to include a 'sock-and-glove-like',
symmetric distribution, progressive repigmentation and generalized hypomelanosis
explanation: The biallelic phenotype, which is hypomelanotic and so the mirror image of FPHH.
diagnosis:
- name: KITLG sequencing
description: >-
Targeted sequencing of the KITLG coding region, concentrated on exon 2 where the VTNNV
hotspot lies, confirms the clinical diagnosis in most families. Because locus
heterogeneity is documented, a negative result does not exclude FPHH.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36453959
reference_title: '[Clinical phenotype and genetic analysis of a Chinese pedigree affected
with familial progressive hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation].'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: High-throughput sequencing revealed that he has harbored a heterozygous c.105T>A
(p.Asn35Lys) variant of the KITLG gene, which was unreported previously. Sanger sequencing
confirmed that the variant has co-segregated with the disease phenotype in his pedigree.
explanation: A worked diagnostic sequence - high-throughput screen followed by Sanger confirmation
and cosegregation testing.
- name: Clinical recognition in infancy
description: >-
The combination of progressive skin pigmentation with hypopigmented spots in an infant is
itself the diagnostic trigger, since the lesions are present at or shortly after birth.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36453959
reference_title: '[Clinical phenotype and genetic analysis of a Chinese pedigree affected
with familial progressive hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation].'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: For infants with progressive skin pigmentation and hypopigmentation spots, FPHH
should be suspected.
explanation: The authors' explicit diagnostic recommendation.
animal_models:
- name: K14-SCF transgenic mouse
species: Mouse
genotype: Human keratin 14 promoter driving epidermal keratinocyte expression of stem cell
factor (KITLG), in membrane-bound and membrane/soluble transgene variants
description: >-
The closest functional analogue of FPHH, and it is an analogue of the mechanism rather
than of the mutation. It puts extra KITLG where FPHH puts overactive KITLG - in the
keratinocytes - and the skin responds with epidermal hyperpigmentation, which is the
direction FPHH goes.
It also speaks to a question this entry leaves open. The pigment increase came with
epidermal melanocytosis, meaning more melanocytes in the interfollicular epidermis, so
excess keratinocyte KITLG signal can expand the melanocyte population and not merely drive
each cell harder. That is the same reading the FPHH immunohistochemistry supports and the
opposite of what this entry's pathograph currently models.
publication: PMID:9584135
genes:
- preferred_term: KITLG
term:
id: hgnc:6343
label: KITLG
modeled_mechanisms:
- target: Progressive Epidermal Melanin Accumulation
relationship: PARTIALLY_RECAPITULATES
fidelity: MODERATE
description: >-
Excess keratinocyte-derived KITLG produces epidermal hyperpigmentation, reproducing the
direction of effect but by overexpressing wild-type ligand rather than by the
gain-of-function substitution that causes the human disease.
limitations: >-
Three gaps between this and FPHH. The transgene overexpresses wild-type SCF, so it models
too much signal rather than an altered ligand-receptor interface, and it cannot speak to
whether the FPHH variants raise binding affinity. Normal mouse interfollicular epidermis
has almost no melanocytes, so the baseline being corrected toward is a species difference
rather than a disease state - the model makes mouse skin more human-like as much as it
makes it FPHH-like. And the membrane/soluble variant also produces cutaneous mastocytosis,
which is not a feature of FPHH.
readouts:
- name: Epidermal melanocyte population in interfollicular skin
target: Progressive Epidermal Melanin Accumulation
direction: INCREASED
interpretation: >-
Melanocytes maintained in the interadnexal epidermis, where mouse skin does not normally
keep them - an increase in melanocyte number rather than in pigment per cell.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:9584135
reference_title: Murine cutaneous mastocytosis and epidermal melanocytosis induced by keratinocyte expression of transgenic stem cell factor.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: Expression of membrane-bound SCF alone resulted in epidermal melanocytosis and
melanin production, but did not by itself cause mastocytosis.
explanation: The melanocyte-number effect isolated from the mast cell phenotype, in the
membrane-bound-only transgene.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:9584135
reference_title: Murine cutaneous mastocytosis and epidermal melanocytosis induced by keratinocyte expression of transgenic stem cell factor.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: caused the maintenance of a population of melanocytes in the interadnexal epidermis,
an area where melanocytes and melanin are found in human skin but where they are not typically
found in murine skin
explanation: Establishes that keratinocyte KITLG excess drives an epidermal melanocyte
population, which is why this model is informative for the human node - and also why its
baseline is a species difference rather than a disease state.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:9584135
reference_title: Murine cutaneous mastocytosis and epidermal melanocytosis induced by keratinocyte expression of transgenic stem cell factor.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: we targeted the expression of SCF to epidermal keratinocytes in mice with two different
transgenes controlled by the human keratin 14 promoter
explanation: The construct - keratinocyte-targeted KITLG expression, which is the cell
compartment FPHH implicates.
environmental:
- name: Sun exposure
description: >-
Ultraviolet exposure deepens existing lesions. It is a modifier of an established
genetic disease rather than a cause of it, and it is the only environmental factor
reported in this literature - the pedigrees explicitly record no chemical exposure
history. It is also the practical reason photoprotection gets recommended even though
no photoprotection study exists in this disease.
exposure_term:
preferred_term: exposure to ultraviolet radiation
term:
id: ECTO:0000006
label: exposure to ultraviolet radiation
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Progressive Epidermal Melanin Accumulation
environmental_effect: EXACERBATES
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Sun exposure darkens lesional skin further, on top of the constitutive drive from the
KITLG variant.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29186243
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation: a report
on a Chinese family and evidence for genetic heterogeneity.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: the lesions deepened after exposure to the sun
explanation: Direct observation across an affected pedigree that UV exposure worsens the
pigmentation.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29186243
reference_title: 'Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation: a report
on a Chinese family and evidence for genetic heterogeneity.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: For all patients, onset times were between one week and one month after birth, and
the lesions deepened after exposure to the sun.
explanation: The pedigree-level statement, which also fixes onset in the first month of life.
treatments:
- name: Genetic Counseling
description: >-
The intervention with the clearest indication, and effectively the only one specific to the
disease rather than borrowed from general dyschromia management. Autosomal dominant
transmission carries a 50% recurrence risk to offspring, penetrance has been described as
reduced, and de novo cases occur - including a demonstrated de novo exon-4 allele - so
unaffected parents do not exclude transmissible disease in the proband's own children.
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
treatment_term:
preferred_term: Genetic Counseling
term:
id: NCIT:C15240
label: Genetic Counseling
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41779177
reference_title: New variant in KITLG shapes the pathogenesis of familial progressive hyper-
and hypo-pigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: it would extend the mutation spectrum of KITLG gene. It would improve the disease
knowledge base and offer a reliable reference for the clinical diagnosis and prevention
of FPHH
explanation: Frames molecular diagnosis as the basis for counselling and prevention. Graded
PARTIAL because it argues for the use of genetic information generally rather than reporting
a counselling intervention or its outcome.
notes: >-
No trial, series, or outcome data exist for any intervention in this disease. This entry
records genetic counselling because it follows directly from the established inheritance
pattern, and deliberately does not curate the cosmetic and depigmenting measures
(photoprotection, topical lightening agents, Q-switched laser) that appear in the general
hyperpigmentation literature: none has been reported in FPHH, and extrapolating them here
would manufacture a treatment section out of inference.
KIT inhibition is the mechanistically obvious idea and is deliberately not curated as a
treatment. Imatinib does suppress melanogenesis and does cause depigmentation in treated
patients, but no one has given it for this indication, systemic KIT inhibition for a benign
cosmetic condition is not a defensible trade, and no topical or intralesional agent exists.
It belongs in a hypothesis, not in this list.
prevalence:
- population: Worldwide
measure_type: CASES_IN_LITERATURE
prevalence_class: UNKNOWN
notes: >-
No population prevalence estimate exists. The disorder is known from a small number of
pedigrees and sporadic cases; as of the 2021 review only eight KITLG mutations had been
reported in association with it. No Orphanet epidemiology class is available to cite, so
prevalence_class is UNKNOWN rather than a numeric band.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: To date, only eight KITLG mutations have been reported to be associated with FPHH,
and no clear genotype-phenotype correlations have been established.
explanation: The size of the reported literature, which is the only occurrence figure available.
discussions:
- discussion_id: fphh_hypopigmentation_reversion
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
prompt: >-
Do the hypopigmented macules of FPHH represent a pigmentary defect, or are they revertant
clones that have lost the mutant KITLG allele and simply look pale against hyperpigmented
skin?
attaches_to:
- pathophysiology#Somatic Reversion of the KITLG Locus in Skin
- phenotypes#Hypopigmented Macules and Streaks
rationale: >-
The answer changes what the disease is. If the pale lesions are revertant clones, the
"with or without hypopigmentation" in the disease name describes a secondary somatic
phenomenon rather than a second primary lesion, and the FPH/FPHH split collapses further -
FPHH would be FPH plus reversion events. The single supporting observation is
lesion-restricted copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity in Blaschko-linear striae in one
patient, and the same paper notes that the cafe-au-lait macules do not follow Blaschko
lines, so reversion cannot be the whole account of the dyspigmentation.
proposed_experiments:
- experiment_id: fphh_lesional_allele_ratio
name: Lesion-restricted allele-ratio testing across an FPHH cohort
description: >-
Digital PCR or deep amplicon sequencing of the causal KITLG allele in matched
hypopigmented lesional skin, adjacent hyperpigmented skin, and blood from multiple
unrelated FPHH patients carrying different alleles, to establish whether copy-neutral
LOH in pale lesions is general or was a single-patient finding.
would_support:
- pathophysiology#Somatic Reversion of the KITLG Locus in Skin
supporting_outcome:
- Loss of the mutant allele restricted to hypopigmented lesional skin in a substantial
fraction of patients, absent from adjacent hyperpigmented skin and from blood.
would_refute:
- pathophysiology#Somatic Reversion of the KITLG Locus in Skin
refuting_outcome:
- Mutant allele retained at germline ratio in hypopigmented lesions across the cohort,
indicating the pale macules arise by a mechanism other than reversion.
- discussion_id: fphh_kitlg_negative_locus_heterogeneity
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
prompt: >-
What accounts for FPHH in the families in which no KITLG variant is found?
attaches_to:
- genetic#KITLG
rationale: >-
Locus heterogeneity is documented but no second gene has been identified. Since KITLG acts
through KIT and the melanogenic transcriptional program it drives, variants elsewhere on
that axis are the obvious candidates, but this has not been shown. Practically, it means a
negative KITLG test cannot exclude the diagnosis.
proposed_experiments:
- experiment_id: fphh_kitlg_negative_exome
name: Exome or genome sequencing of KITLG-negative FPHH pedigrees
description: >-
Unbiased sequencing of multiplex families meeting FPHH clinical criteria in whom KITLG
coding sequence is normal, with attention to KIT and to MITF-pathway melanogenic
regulators.
would_support:
- pathophysiology#Enhanced KITLG-KIT Signaling in Epidermal Melanocytes
supporting_outcome:
- Identification of segregating variants in a second gene on the KITLG-KIT-MITF axis,
which would confirm the pathway while establishing the disorder as genetically
heterogeneous.
- discussion_id: fphh_hyperplasia_vs_hyperfunction
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
prompt: >-
Is the hyperpigmentation of FPHH caused by more melanocytes, or by the same number of
melanocytes each making more pigment?
attaches_to:
- pathophysiology#Increased Melanocyte Melanin Content
- histopathology#Increased epidermal melanin, maximal in the basal layer
- animal_models#Mouse
rationale: >-
The two lines of evidence in this entry point different ways, and the entry commits to one
of them in its pathograph, so the disagreement should be visible rather than buried.
The functional work measures output per cell: adding mutant soluble ligand to a melanoma
line raised tyrosinase activity and roughly doubled melanin content, with no claim about
cell number. That is hyperfunction, and it is what the pathograph models. The
immunohistochemistry points the other way: S100 and HMB45 staining of hyperpigmented skin
was read as showing increased melanocytes as well as increased melanin. KITLG-KIT signalling
is known to drive melanocyte proliferation as well as pigment production, so a
gain-of-function ligand could plausibly do both, and the two readings are not mutually
exclusive.
A third line points the same way as the histology. Targeting KITLG expression to
keratinocytes in mice produces epidermal melanocytosis - more melanocytes in the
interfollicular epidermis - alongside the increased pigment, so an excess keratinocyte
signal demonstrably can expand the population rather than only drive it harder.
Neither observation settles it. The functional experiment used exogenous ligand on a cell
line and could not have detected a proliferative effect in skin. The histology came from a
family in which no KITLG mutation was found, so it may not describe this entity's mechanism
at all. The mouse overexpresses wild-type ligand and starts from an epidermis that normally
has no interfollicular melanocytes at all. What is missing is a melanocyte count in
genotyped patient skin.
proposed_experiments:
- experiment_id: fphh_melanocyte_density
name: Melanocyte density in genotyped FPHH skin
description: >-
Quantitative melanocyte counts, by melanocyte-specific immunohistochemistry on
standardised biopsy fields, comparing lesional hyperpigmented skin against non-lesional
skin from the same patient and against matched controls, in patients with a confirmed
KITLG variant.
would_support:
- pathophysiology#Increased Melanocyte Melanin Content
supporting_outcome:
- Melanocyte density in lesional skin indistinguishable from non-lesional and control skin,
leaving increased melanin per cell as the explanation and confirming the pathograph as
modelled.
would_refute:
- pathophysiology#Increased Melanocyte Melanin Content
refuting_outcome:
- Melanocyte density significantly raised in lesional skin, indicating the pigment excess is
at least partly a proliferative effect and requiring a melanocyte-proliferation node the
pathograph does not currently have.
- discussion_id: fphh_extracutaneous_involvement
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
prompt: >-
Is FPHH strictly skin-limited, or do the extracutaneous features reported in some pedigrees
belong to the KITLG disease?
attaches_to:
- phenotypes#Progressive Diffuse Hyperpigmentation
- genetic#KITLG
rationale: >-
This entry curates no systemic phenotype, and that is a decision rather than a finding.
On one side, an affected pedigree was explicitly reported to have no other skin, nail,
hair, teeth, mucosal, or systemic disease. On the other, the same review's survey of
reported families records sparse lateral eyebrows and malignancy in two families and short
sutures in one, and older pre-molecular reports under the "melanosis universalis
hereditaria" label describe growth and developmental abnormalities. The negative comes from
a single pedigree and cannot carry a disease-level claim; the positives are mostly from
families that were never genotyped, in an era when the label was applied loosely and when
what is now known to be a separate 19p disease was not distinguishable. Until genotyped
series report systematically on extracutaneous findings, neither "skin-limited" nor
"syndromic" is supportable, so the entry asserts neither.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: All the affected individuals in this family had similar lesions, and none of them
showed any other skin, nail, hair, teeth, mucosal or systemic diseases.
explanation: The skin-limited observation. Graded PARTIAL because it is scoped to one family
by its own wording and cannot establish a disease-level negative.
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Sparse lateral eyebrows and malignancy (pharyngeal cancer, papillary thyroid cancer
and melanoma) were found in two families. Short sutures were found in only one family, and
mental retardation was not present in these FPHH patients
explanation: The contrary observations from the same survey, including its own negative on
intellectual disability - which is what the older syndromic reports had claimed.
- discussion_id: fphh_malignancy_risk
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
prompt: >-
Do KITLG gain-of-function alleles carry any increased risk of melanoma or other malignancy,
or is the reported cancer an artefact of small numbers?
attaches_to:
- genetic#KITLG
- clinical_burden#
rationale: >-
Malignancy - pharyngeal cancer, papillary thyroid cancer, and melanoma - was noted in two of
the reported FPHH families, while the six-generation index family had none. Gain-of-function
mutations in KIT, the receptor this ligand activates, cause gastrointestinal stromal tumour,
so a neoplastic effect of chronic pathway activation is not implausible on its face. But the
total reported literature is a few dozen patients, cancers of these types occur in unselected
families, and no age-adjusted comparison has been made. This is recorded as an open question
specifically so that it is not curated as an established complication, which would put
surveillance recommendations on a single uncontrolled observation.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:33407466
reference_title: Identification of a novel mutation in the KITLG gene
in a Chinese family with familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Sparse lateral eyebrows and malignancy (pharyngeal cancer, papillary thyroid cancer
and melanoma) were found in two families.
explanation: The observation that raises the question. Graded PARTIAL because it is an
uncontrolled tally across two reported families with no denominator or population comparison,
so it supports opening the question rather than an association.
proposed_experiments:
- experiment_id: fphh_cancer_incidence_cohort
name: Age-adjusted cancer incidence in an assembled KITLG-variant cohort
description: >-
Pool molecularly confirmed KITLG gain-of-function carriers across reporting centres and
compare observed cancer incidence, melanoma in particular, against population rates matched
for age, sex, and ancestry.
supporting_outcome:
- Cancer incidence significantly above matched population rates in variant carriers, which
would make surveillance a live question.
refuting_outcome:
- Incidence indistinguishable from population rates, establishing the reported cancers as
coincidental and closing the question.
notes: >-
Scope and lump/split decision. Three MONDO terms sit close together here and they do not all
mean the same thing, so the identifiers rather than the labels have to drive the call.
MONDO:0007771 (this entry) carries OMIM:145250 - the KITLG entity. MONDO:0017239, placed as
its child, carries Orphanet:280628 and no OMIM id; it is the Orphanet view of that same
KITLG disease rather than a distinct concept, so it is not curated separately.
MONDO:0013648, by contrast, carries OMIM:614233 and Orphanet:79146, and OMIM:614233 is FPH1
- the phenotype mapped to 19p13.1-pter in a Chinese family whose causal gene has never been
found. That is a genetically distinct disease and is recorded here as a differential, not
folded in.
Worth flagging for someone with the standing to judge it: MONDO currently asserts
MONDO:0013648 (the 19p, gene-unknown FPH1) as a parent of MONDO:0007771 (the KITLG entity).
That is recorded as an observation only - this entry takes no position on the ontology
modelling.
One synonym needs a caveat. "Melanosis universalis hereditaria" is used in the FPHH
literature for this KITLG entity, and is kept here for that reason, but MONDO assigns it as
an exact synonym of MONDO:0013648 - the FPH1 term this entry treats as a different disease.
It is therefore not a safe search key for either concept on its own. "Hyperpigmentation,
familial progressive, 2" (FPH2) is the label that disambiguates cleanly.
Within the KITLG entity the hyper-only and hyper-plus-hypo presentations are handled as
phenotype variability rather than as subtypes, on the strength of the shared p.Asn36Ser
allele and the single mutational hotspot. DUH2 is kept as a differential rather than merged,
because the KITLG link there is stated as likely rather than demonstrated.
The recessive, biallelic KITLG auditory-pigmentary disorder is deliberately excluded: it is
a different direction of effect on the same gene, produces hypomelanosis and sensorineural
hearing loss, and is a separate entity.
FPHH is an autosomal dominant pigmentary genodermatosis in which diffuse, progressive hyperpigmentation — present at birth or appearing in early infancy — enlarges and coalesces with age, in most (not all) patients intermingled with café-au-lait macules (CALMs), lentigines, and hypopigmented ash-leaf macules. It is caused by heterozygous gain-of-function missense variants in KITLG (KIT ligand / stem cell factor) at 12q21.32, which increase melanogenic signalling through the melanocyte KIT receptor.
"Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation (FPHH, MIM 145250) is a rare hereditary skin disorder that is predominantly characterized by progressive, diffuse, partly blotchy hyperpigmented lesions intermingled with scattered hypopigmented spots, lentigines and sometimes Cafe-au-lait spots (CALs)." — Wang J et al. 2021, BMC Med Genomics (PMID:33407466)
"Familial progressive hyperpigmentation (FPH) is an autosomal-dominantly inherited disorder characterized by hyperpigmented patches in the skin, present in early infancy and increasing in size and number with age." — Wang ZQ et al. 2009, Am J Hum Genet (PMID:19375057)
The disorder is essentially skin-limited. Nails, hair, teeth, mucosae and internal organs are typically normal ("none of them showed any other skin, nail, hair, teeth, mucosal or systemic diseases" — PMID:33407466), with rare exceptions discussed in §3.
Two OMIM entities exist and are not the same disease:
| Entity | OMIM | Locus/gene | Distinguishing feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPHH — hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation, familial progressive | #145250 | KITLG, 12q21.32 | Hypopigmented/ash-leaf macules may be present; CALMs, lentigines |
| FPH1 — hyperpigmentation, familial progressive, 1 | #614233 | 19pter–p13.1, gene unknown | Hyperpigmentation only, no hypopigmented component; mapped in a 3-generation Han Chinese family, onset as early as age 5 |
Amyere et al. explicitly separate them and place FPH nearer DUH2:
"FPHH is distinct from familial progressive hyperpigmentation (FPH), in which no hypopigmented features are present, and which is phenotypically and histologically closer to Dyschromatosis Universalis Hereditaria 2 (DUH2)." — Amyere et al. 2011, J Invest Dermatol (PMID:21368769)
Complicating this, OMIM folded the original KITLG FPH family (Wang 2009) into #145250, so the "FPH" label in the 2009 paper and the "FPHH" label in later papers refer to the same KITLG allelic entity, while OMIM #614233 (FPH1) is a genetically distinct, still-unsolved locus. The dismech entry should cover the KITLG entity (MONDO:0007771 / OMIM #145250) and record FPH1 as a differential/related-but-distinct concept, not as a subtype.
| Resource | Identifier |
|---|---|
| MONDO | MONDO:0007771 — "hyperpigmentation with or without hypopigmentation, familial progressive" (as used in the existing stub) |
| OMIM | #145250 (FPHH); gene KITLG *184745 |
| Orphanet | ORPHA:280628 "Familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation"; ORPHA:79146 "Familial progressive hyperpigmentation" (separate concept) |
| MedGen / UMLS | C1840392 |
| GTR condition | C1840392 — 42 tests listed for KITLG, 8 clinical tests for this condition |
| Genomics England PanelApp | KITLG — Green on "Pigmentary skin disorders" (panel 559), monoallelic |
| ICD-10 | No specific code; maps under L81.x (other disorders of pigmentation) — no authoritative source found assigning a specific code; treat as uncoded |
| ICD-11 | Best fit EL5x family (disorders of skin pigmentation) — not verified; do not bind without checking |
Note for the curator: Orphanet is programmatically blocked from web fetch, but this repo already ingests Orphadata. just structured-rebuild-orphanet --id 280628 (and --id 79146) will produce quotable ORPHA: cache rows for the definition, prevalence class, HPO frequencies, and gene-disease row — a better evidence source for §3 and §9 than anything available on the open web.
All of it is aggregated disease-level and case/family-level literature. There is no EHR-derived cohort, no registry, and no biobank series for FPHH. Every quantitative statement in this report traces to a single-family report or an in-vitro experiment. This matters for the entry: frequencies are qualitative, and prevalence is undocumented (see §9).
FPHH is a monogenic, non-environmental, non-infectious disorder. Heterozygous missense variants in KITLG increase the melanogenic output of the KITLG→KIT axis in skin.
"To our knowledge, these data provided the first genetic evidence that the FPH disease is caused by the KITLG N36S mutation, which has a gain-of-function effect on the melanin synthesis" — PMID:19375057
"Most of the FPHH-causing mutations in KITLG are clustered within the conserved VTNNV motif (amino acids 33–37) in exon 2, and a mutated VTNNV domain may increase the affinity of KITLG to the c-Kit receptor, suggesting that the mutation causes a downstream gain-of-function effect." — PMID:33407466
"All the reported mutations affected the residues within the KIT ligand domain, leading to an increased affinity to the kit receptor." — Huang et al. (PMID:39152874)
This is a well-documented and under-appreciated feature and should be curated as a knowledge gap:
"However, many FPHH families without KITLG mutations have been identified, indicating additional locus heterogeneity for this disorder" — PMID:33407466
"sequencing analysis did not show any mutation of the KITLG gene in the ten affected individuals" ... the family "provided evidence for genetic heterogeneity of this genodermatosis" — Chinese 4-generation family, 14 affected (PMID:29186243, An Bras Dermatol)
See also the explicitly titled report "Familial progressive hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation without KITLG mutation" (PMID:27859606; letter, abstract not available in cache — do not use for snippet evidence, cite only for the existence of KITLG-negative families, or better, cite PMID:29186243 which has extractable text).
The unsolved FPH1 locus at 19pter–p13.1 (OMIM 614233) is a second, independent line of evidence for heterogeneity within the broader clinical concept.
None reported. No protective allele, dietary factor, or exposure has been described. By mechanistic inference (not evidence), photoprotection would be expected to limit UV-driven darkening superimposed on the constitutive hyperpigmentation, but I found no study testing this in FPHH — curate as inference in notes, not as an evidence-backed claim.
No published GxE data for FPHH. Two mechanistically plausible but unevidenced axes worth recording as knowledge gaps:
| Phenotype | Type | Onset | Course | Frequency | Candidate HPO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diffuse/blotchy hyperpigmentation | Physical manifestation | Birth or first weeks | Progressive, then plateaus | ~100% (definitional) | Hyperpigmentation of the skin (HP:0000953); Progressive hyperpigmentation (listed by GTR — ID unverified) |
| Hypopigmented macules ("ash-leaf", confetti) | Physical manifestation | Infancy | Progressive in number | Common but not obligate — the "with or without" in the disease name | Hypopigmented skin patches (HP:0001053, verify) |
| Café-au-lait macules | Physical manifestation | Birth to childhood | Increase in number | Frequent; "the most common skin problems present in FPHH patients" besides the dyspigmentation (PMID:33407466) | Café-au-lait spot (HP:0000957); Multiple café-au-lait spots (HP:0007565) |
| Lentigines | Physical manifestation | Childhood, "gradually appeared and increased in number" (PMID:39152874) | Progressive | Frequent | Multiple lentigines (HP:0001003, verify) |
| Palmoplantar involvement | Physical manifestation | With disease | Static/progressive | Frequent ("frequently on the palms, soles and oral mucosa" — PMID:33407466) but not universal (spared in the family of PMID:29186243) | Palmoplantar hyperpigmentation — no confident HPO ID; check |
| Oral mucosal / conjunctival pigmentation | Clinical sign | With disease | Progressive | Variable; prominent in some (PMID:22577587: tongue, palate, gingiva), absent in others | Abnormal oral mucosa morphology / oral pigmentation — check |
| Hypopigmented striae along Blaschko lines | Physical manifestation | Reported once | — | Rare (1 case) | Blaschko-linear hypopigmentation (a PanelApp phenotype label for KITLG) |
| Vitiligo | Physical manifestation | — | — | Rare — "Vitiligo was found in one family" (PMID:33407466); GTR lists it | Vitiligo (HP:0001045, verify) |
| Hyperkeratosis | Clinical sign | — | — | Rare; listed by GTR/HPO | Hyperkeratosis (HP:0000962) |
| Longitudinal melanonychia | Clinical sign | — | — | Rare (single case, both thumbs) | Melanonychia — check |
Quantitative anchors from individual families:
Two pedigrees carry non-cutaneous findings, and one large series explicitly did not:
Curation guidance: treat neurodevelopmental features as unconfirmed and probably not part of the KITLG-defined entity. The two pedigrees reporting them are either pre-molecular or KITLG-untested, and the molecularly confirmed series contradicts them. Record as a KNOWLEDGE_GAP discussion rather than as a phenotype with a frequency.
Malignancy: the three cancers (pharyngeal, papillary thyroid, melanoma) in two families are the only cancer signal, are unreplicated, and are not established as disease-associated. Note that the index FPH family was explicitly cancer-free: "None of the affected members in this family was found to have skin cancer" (PMC2680999). Do not curate FPHH as a cancer-predisposition syndrome.
No FPHH-specific QoL instrument data exist — no DLQI, EQ-5D, SF-36, or PROMIS study. What the literature supports: the burden is cosmetic and psychosocial, in a highly visible, congenital, progressive, whole-body distribution including the face. One case report is explicit that "The treatment is based solely on cosmetic purposes" (PMID:22577587). There is no documented functional impairment, pain, pruritus, or organ dysfunction. Curate QoL as a knowledge gap with an inferred psychosocial-burden note.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Symbol | KITLG (KIT ligand; stem cell factor, SCF; mast cell growth factor, MGF; Steel factor) |
| HGNC | hgnc:6343 (lowercase prefix per repo convention) |
| NCBI Gene | 4254 |
| Ensembl | ENSG00000049130 |
| UniProt | P21583 |
| OMIM | *184745 |
| Cytoband | 12q21.32 (older papers write 12q21 / 12q21.31-q23.1 / 12q21.12-q22 as linkage intervals) |
| RefSeq transcripts | NM_000899 (variant b, 10 exons, includes exon 6 with the primary proteolytic cleavage site → soluble SCF) and NM_003994 (variant a, 9 exons, exon 6 skipped → predominantly membrane-bound) |
RefSeq accession caution. FPHH papers cite NM_000899.4 / NM_000899.5 (PMID:33407466, PMID:41779177), but Vona et al. cite NM_000889.4 (PMID:35543077) — almost certainly a typographical error for NM_000899.4, since NM_000889 is ITGB7. Do not propagate the Vona accession into the entry.
All reported FPHH alleles are heterozygous missense substitutions in the KIT-ligand (receptor-binding) domain. There are no truncating, splice, or structural FPHH alleles — consistent with a gain-of-function mechanism where loss-of-function would give a different disease.
Hotspot 1 — exon 2, the "VTNNV" motif, residues 33–37 (extended to VTNNVK, 33–38, by Huang et al.). This β-strand is the third β-strand of KITLG and is directly involved in receptor engagement.
| cDNA | Protein | Report | PMID |
|---|---|---|---|
| c.98T>C | p.Val33Ala | Amyere 2011 (FPHH family) | 21368769 |
| c.100A>C | p.Thr34Pro | Amyere 2011 (separate FPHH family) | 21368769 |
| c.101C>T | p.Thr34Ile | recurrent; sporadic Chinese case | 33407466 |
| c.104A>T | p.Asn35Ile | novel, Chinese family 1 (4 generations, 7 affected) | 33407466 |
| c.105T>A | p.Asn35Lys | novel, Chinese pedigree, co-segregating | 36453959 |
| c.107A>G | p.Asn36Ser | the index FPH allele (6-generation Chinese family, LOD 4.35 at D12S81); recurrent — also found in 2 of the 7 Amyere FPHH families | 19375057, 21368769 |
| — | p.Val37 (residue implicated; specific substitution not stated in accessible text) | tabulated by Wang J 2021 | 33407466 |
| c.113A>C | p.Lys38Thr | de novo, sporadic 15-year-old Han Chinese boy; extends hotspot to VTNNVK | 39152874 |
Hotspot 2 — exon 4, the ligand core / third α-helix. Fewer alleles, and phenotypically indistinguishable so far.
| cDNA | Protein | Report | PMID |
|---|---|---|---|
| c.329A>T | p.Asp110Val | de novo, Slovenian patient; 3rd α-helix | 34716665 |
| c.329A>G | p.Asp110Gly | de novo; also previously reported as a post-zygotic mosaic variant in a 6-year-old boy with congenital linear and mottled hyperpigmentation | 41779177; mosaic case cited in 33407466 |
| c.337G>A | p.Glu113Lys | novel; "located within another ligand-receptor interaction site" | 32189379 |
Other: p.Ser78Leu — novel, in the Blaschko-linear case (PMID:39269165; cDNA position not given in the abstract — do not invent one).
"Notably, seven known mutations were clustered in a highly conserved short amino acid sequence VTNNV (amino acids 33–37) ... The VTNNV domain of the KITLG protein (amino acids 33–37) lies within the third b-strand of the protein and is responsible for its binding functions." — PMID:33407466
Count discrepancy to flag: Wang J et al. (2021) state eight FPHH alleles; Huang et al. (2024/2026) state "only 10 KITLG mutations reported to cause FPHH" while also writing "seven in nine" are in exon 2. Report the count as approximately 10–12 as of 2026 rather than adopting either figure as exact.
Population frequency: effectively zero. All FPHH alleles are absent or ultra-rare in gnomAD/ExAC/1000 Genomes. I did not retrieve KITLG gene-level constraint metrics (pLI/LOEUF/missense-Z) from gnomAD; a curator wanting them should query gnomAD directly rather than rely on any figure here.
"Digital polymerase chain reaction analysis of the DNA from skin and blood tissues indicated a copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity at the KITLG locus, only in the hypopigmented macule. These findings suggest that the hypopigmented macules might result from revertant mosaicism." — Hida et al. 2025, J Dermatol (PMID:39269165)
Gain of function, established biochemically for p.Asn36Ser and inferred structurally for the rest:
"Function analysis of the soluble form of sKITLG revealed that mutant sKITLG N36S increased the content of the melanin by 109% compared with the wild-type sKITLG in human A375 melanoma cells. Consistent with this result, the tyrosinase activity was significantly increased by mutant sKITLG N36S compared to wild-type control." — PMID:19375057
Absolute values from the full text: "melanin content increased from 16.2 pg per cell (WT sKITLG) to 33.9 pg per cell (mutant sKITLG N36S)"; n=6, two-sided Student's t test (PMC2680999).
Structural rationale for the VTNNV alleles: "Both 35Asn and 34Thr are polar, hydrophilic amino acids, and the mutant became nonpolar, hydrophobic isoleucine; therefore, it might change the features of the protein and affect the ligand affinity to its receptor c-Kit" (PMID:33407466). Note the authors' own hedge: "definitive functional analyses of this mutation are needed."
Important schema note for dismech: per CLAUDE.md's gain/loss decision tree, the variant-level claim belongs in GeneticContext.functional_impact_category: GAIN_OF_FUNCTION; the pathway-activity claim ("melanogenesis driven outside normal keratinocyte-paracrine control") belongs in Descriptor.modifier. Because the KITLG→KIT signal here is genuinely released from its normal regulatory setpoint by a constitutively higher-affinity ligand — not merely running hot — modifier: GAIN_OF_FUNCTION on the KIT-signalling node is defensible; INCREASED on downstream melanin-biosynthesis nodes is the safer, PATO-bound choice. This entry is a legitimate candidate to be the first in the KB to carry both slots on one mutation-driven node.
| Disorder | OMIM | Inheritance | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPHH | 145250 | AD | Heterozygous GOF missense, KIT-ligand domain |
| DFNA69 — nonsyndromic deafness 69, congenital unilateral/asymmetric | 616697 | AD | Heterozygous, e.g. p.Ser96Ter, p.His67_Cys68delinsArg, p.Leu104Val |
| Waardenburg syndrome type 2F | 619947 | AR | Biallelic; e.g. homozygous c.94C>T p.Arg32Cys |
| Biallelic hypomelanosis + SNHL | — | AR | Biallelic LOF → generalized hypomelanosis; residual function → WS2/piebaldism-like |
| Skin/hair/eye pigmentation variation 7 (SHEP7) | 611664 | complex | Common regulatory variation |
| Testicular germ cell tumour susceptibility | 273300 | complex | rs995030 etc., OR ≈ 2.4–2.6 per risk allele |
Vona et al.'s dose model is the cleanest statement of the allelic architecture:
"We speculate that KITLG biallelic loss-of-function variants cause generalized hypomelanosis, whilst variants with residual function lead to a variable auditory-pigmentary disorder mostly reminiscent of Waardenburg syndrome type 2 or piebaldism." — PMID:35543077
Note also that heterozygous carriers of a KITLG null "exhibited lighter-coloured skin than expected for their ethnic background" (PMID:35543077) — a direct human dose–response readout on the opposite side of wild-type from FPHH. Together, FPHH (hypermorph) and the null carriers (hypomorph) bracket KITLG as a continuously dose-sensitive determinant of human skin pigmentation. That is the single strongest mechanistic framing for this entry.
Interesting corollary from Huang et al.: the receptor mirrors the ligand — "Mutations in KIT, encoding for the receptor of KITLG, could lead to piebaldism (loss of function in KIT) or skin hyperpigmentation (gain of function in KIT)."
Not applicable in any causal sense. There are no environmental factors, lifestyle factors, or infectious agents implicated in FPHH. It is fully penetrant-or-not on genotype, congenital in onset, and has no exposure-linked triggers in any published pedigree.
For the environmental: block, the honest curation is either an empty section with a knowledge-gap discussion, or a review_notes: waiver beginning Left deliberately uncited. followed by ≥20 words describing the searches run (PubMed FPHH × exposure; CTD KITLG; ECTO term search for UV/solar radiation exposure) and why nothing citable was found. Do not manufacture a UV-exposure link — it is mechanistically plausible for the tanning arm of KIT signalling but has never been tested in FPHH, and asserting it would fail check-environmental-evidence on substance even if it passed on form.
Step 1 — Mutant ligand (MOLECULAR). A heterozygous missense substitution in the KIT-ligand domain of KITLG — overwhelmingly in the VTNNVK β-strand (residues 33–38), occasionally in the exon-4 α-helical core (Asp110, Glu113) — alters the receptor-contact surface. Predicted consequence: increased affinity of KITLG for KIT, i.e. a hypermorphic ligand rather than more ligand.
GO:0005173 stem cell factor receptor binding (verify label); GO:0005125 cytokine activitymodifier: GAIN_OF_FUNCTION; functional_impact_category: GAIN_OF_FUNCTIONStep 2 — Paracrine over-stimulation of melanocyte KIT (CELLULAR). KITLG is made by the melanocyte's neighbours, not by the melanocyte:
"KITLG, as KIT LIGAND, is produced locally in human skin by epidermal keratinocytes and endothelial cells, where it induces the migration, development and survival of melanocytes." — PMID:33407466
"After KITLG binds the c-KIT receptor, dimerization is triggered. It initiates signal transduction via the RAS/MAPK pathway to upregulate melanoblast proliferation" — PMID:33407466
This is a keratinocyte→melanocyte paracrine axis, which makes FPHH a disease of the melanocyte's niche signal, not of the melanocyte's own genome. Cell types: keratinocyte (CL:0000312) and blood-vessel endothelial cell (CL:0000071) as sources; melanocyte (CL:0000148) and melanoblast (CL:0000541) as targets.
GO:0038109 Kit signaling pathway (verify); GO:0004714 transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity; GO:0007169 cell-surface receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathwayStep 3 — Downstream cascades (CELLULAR). KIT activation feeds RAS–RAF–MAPK, PI3K–AKT, JAK–STAT, and PLCγ1 (GeneCards/UniProt P21583). The FPHH literature emphasizes RAS/MAPK: "KITLG/c-Kit and Ras/MAPK pathways are crucial for controlling pigmentation" (PMID:35543077).
GO:0000165 MAPK cascade; GO:0014065 phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signalingStep 4 — MITF induction (MOLECULAR). MITF is the master melanocyte transcription factor and the convergence point. The 2026 functional study is the first to show transcriptome-wide consequences:
"results showed that the mutation broadly affected the transcription and translation of genes responsible for melanin synthesis, especially the melanin gene MITF." — Wu et al. 2026, Mol Genet Genomics (PMID:41779177)
Step 5 — Tyrosinase up-regulation and increased melanogenesis (CELLULAR). Directly measured: tyrosinase activity and melanin content both rise (§4). Tyrosinase is the rate-limiting enzyme converting L-tyrosine → DOPA → dopaquinone → melanin.
GO:0042438 melanin biosynthetic process; GO:0004503 monophenol monooxygenase (tyrosinase) activity; GO:0042470 melanosome (CC)CHEBI:17895, verify); melanin/eumelanin — no confident CHEBI ID; check before bindingStep 6 — Melanin transfer and epidermal deposition (TISSUE). Melanosomes are transferred to basal keratinocytes; histology shows melanin accumulation "throughout the epidermis, especially in the basal cell layer" (PMID:29186243).
UBERON:0002097); epidermis (UBERON:0001003); stratum basale — verify IDStep 7 — Clinical hyperpigmentation, progressive with age (ORGANISM).
This is the entry's headline knowledge gap, stated plainly by the field:
"Disturbances in the KITLG-KIT interaction result in diffuse hyperpigmentation in FPHH. However, the mechanisms behind hypopigmented macule formation remain unclear." — Hida et al. (PMID:39269165)
Two competing/complementary hypotheses, both worth curating as mechanistic_hypotheses with distinct hypothesis_group_ids:
Hypothesis A — revertant somatic mosaicism (EMERGING, one case). Copy-neutral LOH at the KITLG locus removes the mutant allele in a clone of skin, producing a wild-type (hence relatively hypopigmented) patch on a hyperpigmented background. Supported by: LOH detected by digital PCR "only in the hypopigmented macule," and the lesions following Blaschko lines — the signature of clonal cutaneous mosaicism. Note Amyere et al. also flagged "Loss of Heterozygosity" and "Gene Dosage" as MeSH keywords back in 2011 (PMID:21368769), so the idea has a longer pedigree than the single 2025 report.
Hypothesis B — distinct pathogenesis for CALMs. From the same paper: "café-au-lait spots do not follow the lines of Blaschko and can superimpose on the hypopigmented striae, indicating a distinct pathogenesis." So FPHH skin plausibly carries three superimposed lesion classes with three mechanisms: constitutive diffuse hyperpigmentation (germline GOF), clonal hypopigmented reversion (somatic LOH), and CALMs (mechanism unknown).
Hypothesis C — melanocyte exhaustion/depletion (speculative). Chronic supraphysiological KIT stimulation could plausibly deplete the melanocyte stem-cell pool in patches. No direct evidence. The histology is at least consistent with absence of functioning melanocytes in hypopigmented skin (S100/HMB45 "almost completely negative"), but that cannot distinguish reversion from depletion.
Hyperpigmented skin:
"Histopathological and immunohistochemical staining for S100 and HMB45 of skin biopsy specimens from the hyperpigmented areas showed a striking increase in melanin throughout the epidermis, especially in the basal cell layer." — PMID:29186243
"strong basilar and suprabasilar hyperpigmentation ... Masson-Fontana stained sections showed an increase in the number of melanocytes in the basal and suprabasal cell layers." — PMID:22577587
Hypopigmented skin:
"The staining for S100 and HMB45 were almost completely negative in the hypopigmentation areas." — PMID:29186243 — i.e. melanocytes are absent, not merely underproductive, which favours Hypothesis A or C over a pure "less melanin per cell" model.
⚠ Conflict — do not paper over this. Wang ZQ et al. 2009 contains an internal contradiction. Its figure caption reports the authors' own biopsy as showing "a significant increase of the number of melanocytes and of the melanin content in the basal keratinocytes, as well as a slight increase in the size of melanocytes," while the main text, citing prior FPH literature, states biopsies showed "increased melanin in the basal layer, but no increase in the number of melanocytes within the epidermis" (PMC2680999). Whether FPHH hyperpigmentation is melanocyte hyperplasia or per-melanocyte hyperfunction is therefore genuinely unsettled — and it matters, because KIT signalling drives both proliferation and melanogenesis. Curate as two evidence items with different supports values, or as a KNOWLEDGE_GAP discussion attached to the melanogenesis node. Do not assert either as fact.
Experiment proposal.CL:0000097, but no mast-cell phenotype has been reported in FPHH patients — a notable negative worth recording.)kb/modules/).datasets: accession — just discover-datasets will surface KITLG-adjacent melanocyte studies that are GENE_ONLY at best and require the manual relevance triage CLAUDE.md warns about.Organ level
- Primary: skin (UBERON:0002097) — the only consistently affected organ. Integumentary system.
- Secondary: oral mucosa (UBERON:0000344, verify), lips, conjunctiva (UBERON:0001811, verify) — pigmented in some patients, spared in others.
- No cardiovascular, neurological, digestive, respiratory, endocrine, renal, or skeletal involvement in molecularly confirmed FPHH.
- Allelic-disorder context only: the stria vascularis of the cochlea (UBERON:0002499, verify) is the site of the KITLG hearing phenotype (DFNA69/WS2F), via intermediate cells = cochlear melanocytes. Do not attribute hearing loss to FPHH itself.
Regional distribution: face, neck, trunk, limbs; frequently palms and soles; occasionally sparing them. Distribution is bilateral and broadly symmetric/generalized for the diffuse hyperpigmentation, but the superimposed macules are random and asymmetric, and the reverted hypopigmented lesions follow Blaschko lines (mosaic, not anatomically symmetric).
Tissue level: stratified squamous epithelium of the epidermis (UBERON:0001003); specifically the basal and suprabasal layers. Dermis is uninvolved except as the source of endothelial KITLG.
Cell level
| Cell type | CL (verify) | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Melanocyte | CL:0000148 | Primary effector — hyperfunctional and/or hyperplastic |
| Melanoblast | CL:0000541 | Developmental target of KIT signalling |
| Keratinocyte | CL:0000312 | Ligand source (paracrine) and melanin recipient |
| Basal cell of epidermis | check | Site of melanin accumulation |
| Blood-vessel endothelial cell | CL:0000071 | Second dermal ligand source |
| Mast cell | CL:0000097 | KIT-dependent lineage; no reported FPHH phenotype (negative finding) |
Subcellular level: melanosome (GO:0042470) — melanin synthesis and transfer; plasma membrane (GO:0005886) — KIT receptor and membrane-bound KITLG; extracellular space (GO:0005615) — soluble sKITLG.
Onset: congenital to early infantile. Multiple independent formulations:
- "Generalized hyper- and hypopigmentation with irregular patches was found at birth" (PMID:33407466)
- "One week after birth, it was shown that her diffuse hyperpigmented skin was intermixed with some small lentigines/CAL-like lesions" (PMID:33407466)
- "present at birth or develop early in infancy" (OMIM #145250 description)
- "The pigmentation was present since birth and eventually increased thereafter" (PMID:22577587)
- HPO onset category: Congenital onset / Neonatal onset (HP:0003577 / HP:0003623, verify)
Onset pattern: insidious and chronic — never acute, never episodic.
Progression — this is the defining temporal signature and has a documented biphasic rate:
"This process was rapid during childhood and slower during adolescence, and it resulted in extensive hyperpigmentation of the conjunctive face, neck, trunk, limbs, lips, oral mucosa, palms, and soles." — PMC2680999
"With increasing age, the lesions increased in both size and number and became more noticeable" — PMID:33407466
Progression is by three simultaneous axes: individual patches enlarge, new patches appear, and adjacent patches become confluent ("increase in size, number and confluence with age" — Orphanet phrasing for the FPH concept).
Suggested progression: phases for the entry:
| Phase | Timing | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Congenital/neonatal | Birth to ~1 month | Diffuse hyperpigmentation ± large CALM-like patches present or emerging |
| Rapid childhood progression | Infancy → ~puberty | Fastest accrual of new lentigines, CALMs, hypopigmented macules; patch enlargement |
| Adolescent deceleration | Puberty → early adulthood | Same process, slower rate |
| Adult stable/extensive | Adulthood | Extensive, largely stable involvement; a 53-year-old affected male showed no new disease category, and no skin cancer |
Disease course: chronic, lifelong, progressive, non-remitting. No spontaneous remission reported. No relapsing-remitting behaviour. Not self-limited. Life expectancy is unaffected (§11).
Remission: none spontaneous. The only documented local lightening is the somatic-reversion mechanism producing hypopigmented macules (PMID:39269165) — which is a lesion-level genetic event, not clinical remission. Treatment-induced lightening is cosmetic and, by analogy to other benign pigmented lesions, expected to be temporary (§12).
Critical periods: infancy and childhood are the window of maximal lesion accrual, which is when a purely mechanistic argument for early intervention would apply — but no intervention exists to test that, so this is an inference, not a recommendation.
No prevalence or incidence estimate exists in the literature, and the field says so explicitly:
"Because FPHH is very rare with reduced penetrance, no clear incidence rate of this disease has been documented." — PMID:33407466
For the prevalence: block, the correct structured record is:
prevalence:
- population: Worldwide
measure_type: UNKNOWN
prevalence_class: ULTRA_RARE # or NOT_YET_DOCUMENTED
notes: >-
No incidence or prevalence estimate has been published. Fewer than ~25 molecularly
confirmed families are reported worldwide as of 2026.
Do not compute a rate_per_100000. A defensible order-of-magnitude anchor for notes: roughly 10–12 distinct KITLG alleles across on the order of 15–20 published families/probands, plus an unknown number of KITLG-negative families — i.e. well under 1 per 1,000,000. Consider fetching ORPHA:280628 for an Orphanet-assigned prevalence class, which would be quotable.
HP:0000006), consistently across all KITLG-positive pedigrees. Six-generation (PMID:19375057) and four-generation (PMID:33407466) pedigrees with clean co-segregation.FPHH is a clinical diagnosis confirmed by KITLG sequencing, made in an infant or child with congenital diffuse hyperpigmentation plus dyspigmented macules, after NF1/Legius and the dyschromatoses have been considered.
| Modality | Utility for FPHH |
|---|---|
| Single-gene KITLG sequencing | First-line and usually sufficient. All coding exons + flanking intronic sequence, Sanger or NGS. Exons 2 and 4 carry every reported allele. Method as used by PMID:33407466: "All exons and their flanking intronic sequences of the KITLG gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction ... sequenced directly using an ABI Prism 3730" |
| Targeted gene panel | Strongly indicated when the differential is broad. KITLG is Green on Genomics England PanelApp "Pigmentary skin disorders" (panel 559), monoallelic. A dyschromatosis/pigmentary panel should also carry ABCB6, SASH1, NF1, SPRED1, PTPN11, TSC1/TSC2, KIT, MITF, SOX10, PAX3, STK11 |
| WES | Used successfully for de novo/sporadic cases (PMID:39152874, PMID:41779177, PMID:36453959). Valuable because it simultaneously excludes NF1/SPRED1: "no suspected disease-causing variants in NF1 or SPRED1 leading to similar manifestations were identified in the whole-exome sequencing" |
| WGS | No specific added value demonstrated; reasonable for KITLG-negative families where a novel locus is suspected |
| Trio testing | Important — establishes de novo status and informs recurrence risk |
| Lesional (skin) DNA testing | Under-used and mechanistically important. Digital PCR on DNA from individual lesions detected copy-neutral LOH present only in the hypopigmented macule (PMID:39269165). Blood-only testing will miss both mosaic causal alleles and revertant clones |
| CMA / karyotype / FISH | Not indicated. No CNV or cytogenetic mechanism |
| mtDNA testing | Not indicated |
| Repeat expansion testing | Not indicated |
Variant interpretation: apply ACMG/AMP. Documented codes for FPHH alleles: PS4, PM1 (VTNNVK hotspot), PP1/PP2 (co-segregation), PP3 (in-silico: SIFT "deleterious", PolyPhen-2 "possibly damaging", MutationTaster "disease causing"), PM2 (absent from gnomAD/ExAC/dbSNP). Typical resulting classification: likely pathogenic.
Supportive, not diagnostic. Findings (§6): increased melanin throughout the epidermis, maximal in the basal layer; Masson–Fontana positive; S100 and HMB45 highlight melanocytes in hyperpigmented skin and are "almost completely negative" in hypopigmented areas. Melanocyte number is disputed. No pigmentary incontinence or interface change is characteristic — their presence should redirect to post-inflammatory dyspigmentation or DUH.
There are no formal, society-published diagnostic criteria for FPHH. Diagnosis rests on the clinical triad (congenital/early-infantile onset + diffuse progressive hyperpigmentation + superimposed CALMs/lentigines/hypopigmented macules) + AD family history (when present) + KITLG variant.
| Differential | How to distinguish |
|---|---|
| Neurofibromatosis type 1 | CALMs + axillary/inguinal freckling, but no diffuse background hyperpigmentation; Lisch nodules, neurofibromas, optic glioma; NF1 variant |
| Legius syndrome | "characterized by familial café-au-lait spots and skin fold freckling, caused by mutations in SPRED1" (PMID:21368769); no diffuse hyperpigmentation |
| Dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria (DUH1/2/3) | Hyper- and hypopigmented macules but on normal-appearing background skin, not diffuse hyperpigmentation; reticulate; ABCB6 (DUH3) / SASH1. DUH2 maps to 12q21–q23 — overlapping the FPHH locus, and Amyere et al. suggest KITLG may underlie DUH2 too ("mutations in a single gene cause various pigmentation disorders: FPH, FPHH, and likely DUH2") |
| LEOPARD / Noonan with multiple lentigines | Lentigines + cardiac, growth, genital, deafness features; PTPN11 |
| Tuberous sclerosis complex | Ash-leaf macules without diffuse hyperpigmentation; angiofibromas, shagreen patch, seizures, tubers |
| Peutz–Jeghers syndrome | Perioral/mucosal lentigines, GI polyposis; STK11 |
| Piebaldism / Waardenburg | Congenital stable leukoderma with white forelock; loss-of-function KIT/KITLG/MITF/PAX3/SOX10 — the mechanistic mirror image |
| Addison disease / Cushing / ACTH-driven | Acquired, mucosal + palmar-crease accentuation, abnormal endocrine labs |
| Carbon baby syndrome (universal acquired melanosis) | Acquired diffuse darkening, non-familial |
| Haemochromatosis, drug-induced (incl. imatinib), heavy metals, smoker's melanosis | Acquired, exposure history, distinctive labs |
| Naegeli–Franceschetti–Jadassohn / dermatopathia pigmentosa reticularis | Reticulate pigmentation with nail/dental/sweating abnormalities; KRT14 |
Sources for the differential list: PMID:22577587, PMID:39152874, PMID:21368769, IJDVL variant case, and the DUH literature (PMID:37353900).
Survival and mortality: normal. No FPHH-attributable mortality has ever been reported. No excess mortality, no reduction in life expectancy, no disease-specific mortality rate. Affected individuals survive into at least the sixth decade with no systemic disease (a 53-year-old affected male is described in the index family, PMC2680999). SEER, GBD, CDC, and national mortality databases contain nothing on this disease.
Morbidity and function: no physical disability. No functional impairment, no ICF-codable disability, no organ failure. The burden is cosmetic and psychosocial, in a disorder that is visible, whole-body, facial, congenital, and progressive — but there are no QoL instrument data of any kind (§3). This gap is real and worth recording as such rather than filled with plausible-sounding numbers.
Complications - Cutaneous malignancy: not established. Melanoma occurred in one of two families that also reported pharyngeal and papillary thyroid cancer (PMID:33407466); the index six-generation family had none ("None of the affected members in this family was found to have skin cancer"). Given that KIT-GOF receptor mutations cause GIST, the theoretical concern is not absurd — but the FPHH ligand alleles have no demonstrated neoplastic risk, and a KITLG-GOF melanoma link would be a significant claim requiring far more than one family. Curate as an open question, explicitly not as an established complication. - No infections, no organ failure, no secondary systemic complications.
Recovery potential: none, and none needed. The pigmentary phenotype is permanent; it neither resolves nor threatens health.
Prognostic factors: none identified. No age, severity, biomarker, or genotype predictor of course. Since no genotype–phenotype correlation exists, allele identity currently carries no prognostic information.
Prognostic biomarkers: none.
Bottom line: there is no disease-modifying therapy, no approved drug, no clinical trial, and no published treatment series for FPHH. Management is cosmetic and supportive. Every statement below is either directly sourced to FPHH literature (little) or drawn from general hyperpigmentation management and labelled as such.
"The treatment is based solely on cosmetic purposes. The cosmetic oral treatment including depigmentation procedure of the gingiva can be carried out." — PMID:22577587 (patient declined; recommended "periodic evaluation")
That is essentially the entirety of the FPHH-specific treatment evidence base.
General hyperpigmentation management comprises "photoprotection, topical lightening agents, oral agents, chemical peels, and laser therapy" (PMID:35158001, JAAD review Part II). Applied to FPHH:
| Intervention | Rationale | Candidate NCIT (verify) | Evidence in FPHH |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photoprotection (broad-spectrum SPF ≥30, physical measures) | Limits UV-driven superimposed darkening and PIH after any procedure | NCIT:C15747 Supportive Care |
None. Inference only |
| Camouflage cosmetics | Direct cosmetic benefit, zero risk | NCIT:C15747 |
None |
| Genetic counselling | The single most clearly indicated intervention — AD, 50% recurrence, reduced penetrance, de novo cases | NCIT:C15240 Genetic Counseling |
Standard of care by inference from inheritance |
Topical lightening (hydroquinone CHEBI:17594, tretinoin CHEBI:15367, triple-combination cream) |
Standard for epidermal hyperpigmentation | NCIT:C15986 Pharmacotherapy + therapeutic_agent |
None in FPHH. Also mechanistically dubious here: the drive is a continuous constitutive signal, so any lightening should relapse |
| Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1064/532 nm) | "The gold standard in managing benign hyperpigmentations is currently 1064/532 nanometers Q-Switched lasers"; 36.4–76.6% success in solar lentigines | Laser therapy — no confident NCIT ID; check | None in FPHH. Note picosecond laser has been used in SASH1-DUH (Skin Health Dis 2025), the nearest published precedent |
| Gingival depigmentation | For symptomatic oral pigmentation | check | The one FPHH-specific procedural suggestion (PMID:22577587) |
| Psychosocial support | Visible congenital difference | NCIT:C15747 |
None; inference |
Two cautions the curator should keep in the entry, because they are genuine risks rather than boilerplate: 1. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. In skin that is constitutively hypermelanotic under a hyperactive melanogenic drive, any laser or peel carries an elevated PIH risk. The general literature already recommends "broad-spectrum sunscreen with SPF ≥ 30 and physical photoprotection ... after Q-switched laser treatment to prevent post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation" (Tandfonline 2024 RCT). 2. Expected relapse. Ablating melanin does not touch the germline GOF signal.
The pathway is druggable. Imatinib and other KIT inhibitors reliably cause depigmentation:
Imatinib "inhibits the phosphorylation of c-kit receptor through SCF-induced melanocyte proliferation and melanogenesis"; "even at low concentrations it causes decreases in total melanin content and tyrosinase activity"; "The inhibition of melanogenesis is due to suppressed expression of tyrosinase and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiTF)" (PMID:24479586, and see PMID:14635084)
Depigmentation occurs in 33–41% of imatinib-treated patients (up to ~80% in pigmented populations) and is reversible on withdrawal. Picardo & Cardinali's commentary gestures at exactly this: the KITLG/c-Kit findings "offer hope for the development of new and efficacious treatment strategies" (PMID:21566575).
But: systemic imatinib for a benign cosmetic condition is not a defensible risk–benefit trade, and imatinib also causes hyperpigmentation in some patients (PMC11401049) — the pigmentary response is unpredictable. A topical/intralesional KIT inhibitor would be the rational形 of this idea and does not exist. Curate this as a mechanistic_hypotheses / Experiment proposal or a discussions entry, never as a treatment.
GENE_EDITING treatment.clinical_trials:.Primary prevention of the disease itself is impossible — FPHH is a germline monogenic condition with no environmental component. What is preventable is transmission and procedural harm.
| Level | Applicable? | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | Only reproductive | Genetic counselling (NCIT:C15240) — AD, 50% recurrence per pregnancy from an affected parent, reduced penetrance, documented de novo cases (so unaffected parents of a proband have low but non-zero recurrence risk via possible germline mosaicism). Prenatal diagnosis and PGT-M are technically available once the familial variant is known; whether to offer them for a non-life-limiting cosmetic condition is a family-level values decision |
| Secondary | Limited | Cascade testing of at-risk relatives; early dermatologic recognition to avoid a diagnostic odyssey and, importantly, to avoid misdiagnosis as NF1, which would trigger unnecessary NF1 surveillance (imaging, ophthalmology) and cause real anxiety and cost |
| Tertiary | Limited | Photoprotection to limit superimposed UV darkening (inferred, not evidenced); careful patient selection before laser/peel to avoid PIH; periodic skin examination — reasonable general practice in a patient with numerous pigmented lesions, and made more reasonable (though not established) by the single family reporting melanoma |
Not applicable: immunization, population screening programmes, newborn screening, behavioural/lifestyle interventions, public-health interventions, environmental interventions, chemoprophylaxis. There is no risk-stratification model.
No naturally occurring animal homolog of FPHH exists. OMIA lists no KITLG-GOF hyperpigmentation phenotype in any domestic species, and I found no veterinary report. Curate this section as explicitly empty rather than stretching to fill it.
What does exist is the mirror-image phenotype — Kitl loss of function, which is one of the classic loci of mouse genetics:
Orthologs: Kitl (mouse, MGI:96974), Kitlg (rat), kitlga/kitlgb (zebrafish — the duplicated teleost paralogs; kitlga governs melanophore development), plus conserved orthologs across vertebrates. The KITLG–KIT axis is deeply evolutionarily conserved as the core melanocyte-development module across vertebrates, which is why the mouse and zebrafish literatures translate well.
Comparative pathology: the loss-of-function side translates cleanly (mouse Sl/W, human piebaldism/WS2, dog/horse/pig KIT white-spotting alleles). The gain-of-function side — FPHH's actual mechanism — has no natural animal counterpart, which is precisely why the engineered models in §15 matter.
Zoonosis / cross-species transmission: not applicable.
There is no animal model carrying a human FPHH allele. No knock-in mouse expressing p.Asn36Ser, p.Thr34Ile, p.Asp110Val, or any other FPHH variant has been reported. Everything below either models the pathway in the right direction (K14-Scf), models the gene in the wrong direction (Kitl LOF), or models the variant in cells rather than an organism. This should be curated as an explicit HUMAN_MODEL_MISMATCH discussion, not as a routine KNOWLEDGE_GAP: model evidence exists and is informative for the pathway, but no model reproduces the human FPHH mechanism.
1. K14-Scf (K14-Kitl) transgenic mouse — the closest functional analog of FPHH. Krt14 promoter drives SCF in basal keratinocytes; this is a gain of keratinocyte-derived KITLG signal, the same directional perturbation as FPHH.
relationship: PARTIALLY_RECAPITULATES, fidelity: MODERATE, readouts = epidermal melanocyte count (INCREASED), epidermal melanin content (INCREASED).2. Kitlg^Δ/+ frameshift mouse (2025) — the LOF counterpart. Xiao et al., Genes & Diseases 2025; PMID:41584853, DOI 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101890 (PMC12824913). CRISPR/Cas9 heterozygous Kitlg c.81_84del, p.E27DfsX5.
FAILS_TO_RECAPITULATE FPHH — it is a haploinsufficiency model producing hypopigmentation and deafness (DFNA69/WS2F), the opposite phenotype. Its value to an FPHH entry is (a) confirming KITLG dose-sensitivity of pigmentation in vivo, and (b) modelling the incomplete penetrance that FPHH also shows. If curated, it must carry limitations and its own evidence per test_failure_to_recapitulate_links_are_substantiated.3. Steel (Sl) allelic series — the historical LOF resource (MGI:96974); dozens of alleles from null (homozygous lethal) to hypomorphic (viable, white-coated, sterile, anaemic). Same directional caveat as above.
4. Cell models — where the actual FPHH variants have been tested.
- A375 human melanoma cells + recombinant soluble sKITLG (WT vs N36S). Readouts: melanin content 16.2 → 33.9 pg/cell; tyrosinase activity significantly increased; n=6, two-sided t-test (PMID:19375057, PMC2680999). evidence_source: IN_VITRO. Limitation worth stating in the entry: A375 is a melanoma line, not a normal melanocyte, and the assay adds exogenous soluble ligand rather than modelling heterozygous endogenous expression in a keratinocyte–melanocyte co-culture.
- Adenine base editor–engineered cells + RNA-seq (2026). The first modern functional platform for FPHH: "Functional changes were explored at a cellular level with the help of adenine base editors, and the differentially expressed genes in the melanin pathway were detected through RNA-sequencing" (PMID:41779177). This is the model system to build on — it edits the endogenous locus rather than adding recombinant protein.
- Human explanted skin (historical, cited in PMID:33407466): "Injection of the soluble form of sKITLG resulted in hyperpigmentation of the grafted skin tissue, while injection of the KIT- or KITLG-blocking antibodies into the explanted human skin led to a loss of melanocytes." A human-tissue bidirectional demonstration of the axis — the highest-fidelity evidence available and a strong candidate for an experimental_models: entry with modeled_mechanisms.
- In silico: SIFT, PolyPhen-2, MutationTaster, SWISS-MODEL homology modelling (PMID:33407466, PMID:39152874). evidence_source: COMPUTATIONAL.
5. Not yet used but obvious: zebrafish kitlga (melanophore patterning, live imaging, high throughput); human iPSC-derived melanocytes; keratinocyte–melanocyte co-culture or 3D reconstructed skin with an FPHH allele knocked into the keratinocyte compartment — which is the only system that would test the paracrine architecture properly. None reported.
would_support: pathophysiology#KITLG Gain-of-Function Signaling. supporting_outcome: progressive epidermal hyperpigmentation with age; increased epidermal melanocyte number and/or melanin per cell.would_refute if Kd is unchanged.MGI (Kitl MGI:96974, Steel allele series, IMSR strain availability), IMPC/KOMP, Alliance of Genome Resources, ZFIN (kitlga), Cellosaurus/ATCC (A375, CVCL_0132), Addgene (ABE constructs).
discussions| Gap | Kind | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism of hypopigmented macule formation | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
Explicitly stated as unknown by the field; revertant-mosaicism hypothesis rests on one patient |
| Melanocyte hyperplasia vs per-cell hyperfunction | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
Primary literature is internally contradictory (PMC2680999) |
| Increased KITLG–KIT affinity never directly measured | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
The central mechanistic claim is structural inference, not biophysics |
| KITLG-negative FPHH families / second locus | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
Multiple families; FPH1 at 19pter–p13.1 unsolved |
| No animal model of any FPHH allele | HUMAN_MODEL_MISMATCH |
K14-Scf models the pathway direction but not the allele; Kitlg^Δ/+ models the opposite direction |
| Penetrance unquantified; no genotype–phenotype correlation | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
Blocks counselling precision |
| No prevalence estimate | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
prevalence_class: ULTRA_RARE with measure_type: UNKNOWN is the honest record |
| Neurodevelopmental features: entity feature or coincidence? | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
Two pedigrees report them; the molecularly confirmed series contradicts |
| Malignancy signal in two families | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
Unreplicated; must not be curated as an established complication |
| No QoL data despite a highly visible congenital condition | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
Attach to clinical_burden# |
| Isoform (soluble vs membrane-bound) effects untested | KNOWLEDGE_GAP |
All functional work used sKITLG only |
Suggested next step: before drafting the YAML, run just structured-rebuild-orphanet --id 280628 --id 79146 (needs the Orphadata bulk XML) to get quotable ORPHA: rows for the prevalence class, HPO frequency table, and gene-disease assertion — that would convert three of the qualitative gaps above (prevalence, phenotype frequencies, gene-disease validity) into snippet-validated evidence. Want me to attempt that, or go straight to expanding the stub's pathophysiology and phenotypes blocks from what is already in references_cache/?
Checked with linkml-reference-validator 0.2.1.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| References checked | 29 |
| Resolved | 29 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| Quoted claims checked | 45 |
| Quoted claims found in source | 30 |
| Quoted claims not found in source | 15 |
| Quoted claims with nothing to check against | 1 |
| References weighed for topical relevance | 29 |
| On topic | 15 |
| Off topic | 1 |
Searched the abstract, any retrieved full text, and the title. A quote drawn from a part of the paper that was not retrieved will appear here too, so check before treating one as invented:
Every one of these was searched against an abstract alone, with no full text retrieved - marked abstract only below. Where full text can be fetched, re-running with it will settle them; where the source publishes only a summary to PubMed, as GeneReviews chapters do, it will not, and the quote has to be checked by hand against the chapter itself.
PMID:19375057 (abstract only): "To our knowledge, these data provided the first genetic evidence that the FPH disease is caused by the KITLG N36S mutation, which has a gain-of-function effect on the melanin synthesis"PMID:29186243 (abstract only): "Familial progressive hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation without KITLG mutation"PMC:PMC2680999 (abstract only): "extensive hyperpigmentation of the conjunctive face, neck, trunk, limbs, lips, oral mucosa, palms, and soles"PMC:PMC2680999 (abstract only): "None of the affected members in this family was found to have skin cancer"PMID:22577587 (abstract only): "The treatment is based solely on cosmetic purposes"PMID:19375057 (abstract only): "Function analysis of the soluble form of sKITLG revealed that mutant sKITLG N36S increased the content of the melanin by 109% compared with the wild-type sKITLG in human A375 melanoma cells. Consistent with this result, the tyrosinase activity was significantly increased by mutant sKITLG N36S compared to wild-type control."PMID:22577587 (abstract only): "strong basilar and suprabasilar hyperpigmentation ... Masson-Fontana stained sections showed an increase in the number of melanocytes in the basal and suprabasal cell layers."PMID:29186243 (abstract only): "The staining for S100 and HMB45 were almost completely negative in the hypopigmentation areas."PMC:PMC2680999 (abstract only): "increased melanin in the basal layer, but no increase in the number of melanocytes within the epidermis"PMID:22577587 (abstract only): "Hematology and blood chemistry did not reveal any abnormalities"PMID:22577587 (abstract only): "The pigmentation was present since birth and eventually increased thereafter"PMC:PMC2680999 (abstract only): "This process was rapid during childhood and slower during adolescence, and it resulted in extensive hyperpigmentation of the conjunctive face, neck, trunk, limbs, lips, oral mucosa, palms, and soles."PMID:22577587 (abstract only): "The treatment is based solely on cosmetic purposes. The cosmetic oral treatment including depigmentation procedure of the gingiva can be carried out."PMID:24479586 (abstract only): "The inhibition of melanogenesis is due to suppressed expression of tyrosinase and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiTF)"PMID:14635084 (abstract only): "The inhibition of melanogenesis is due to suppressed expression of tyrosinase and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiTF)"These identifiers resolve, so they are not fabrications, but the records they resolve to share almost none of this report's vocabulary. That is a clue and not a verdict - a paper can be relevant in ways its title and abstract do not spell out - so read them before deciding:
PMC:PMC8544362 (3 mentions) - Nanosecond Q-Switched 1064/532 nm Laser to Treat Hyperpigmentations: A Double Center Retrospective Study.Weighed against this report's own most characteristic terms: fphh, kitlg, hyperpigmentation, skin, disease, allele, gene, kit, variant, family, hypopigmented, macule, melanocyte, cell, progressive, affected, genetic, phenotype, congenital, disorder.
There was no text to compare these against, so they are neither confirmed nor contradicted:
DOI:10.1080/09546634.2024.2398768: "broad-spectrum sunscreen with SPF ≥ 30 and physical photoprotection ... after Q-switched laser treatment to prevent post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation"Checked with linkml-term-validator 0.4.5, through the ols: adapter.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| Terms checked | 43 |
| Resolved | 38 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Obsolete | 2 |
| Unverifiable | 3 |
| Terms whose name was checked | 6 |
| Terms named correctly | 5 |
| Terms named as a different term | 1 |
These identifiers resolve, so nothing about them looks wrong, and the ontology calls them something unrelated to what the report calls them. That usually means the identifier is not the one the sentence needs:
NCIT:C15747 (3 mentions) - the report calls it "Direct cosmetic benefit, zero risk", "Visible congenital difference"; NCIT calls it Supportive CareThese terms are real but deprecated. Citing one is not a fabrication; it does mean the report is naming something the ontology has retired:
GO:0014065 (obsolete phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling) (1 mention) - replaced by GO:0043491GO:0005615 (obsolete extracellular space) (1 mention) - replaced by GO:0005576The report gives these identifiers more than one name of its own:
NCIT:C15747 - called "Direct cosmetic benefit, zero risk", "Visible congenital difference"Terms carrying these prefixes were not checked either way, because no configured ontology covers them. An unrecognised prefix may name an ontology this run could not reach as easily as one that does not exist, so nothing here is evidence of fabrication: ORPHA, MGI.