Ask OpenScientist

Ask a research question about FOXG1 Disorder. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).

Submitting...

Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.

1
Inheritance
5
Pathophys.
36
Phenotypes
10
Pathograph
1
Genes
4
Treatments
3
Subtypes
1
Trials
1
Deep Research
👪

Inheritance

1
Autosomal dominant
Show evidence (2 references)
ORPHA:598164 SUPPORT Other
"Autosomal dominant"
Orphanet lists autosomal dominant inheritance for the intragenic FOXG1 subtype.
PMID:38843374 SUPPORT Other
"FOXG1 syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant."
GeneReviews supports autosomal dominant inheritance and notes that most probands have a de novo FOXG1 pathogenic variant.

Subtypes

3
FOXG1 syndrome due to intragenic alteration
FOXG1 syndrome caused by an intragenic FOXG1 alteration; Orphanet lists this as a clinical subtype with autosomal dominant inheritance and disease-causing loss-of-function FOXG1 variants.
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:598164 SUPPORT Other
"FOXG1 | forkhead box G1 | hgnc:3811 | Disease-causing germline mutation(s) (loss of function) in"
The Orphanet subtype record directly links intragenic FOXG1 loss of function to this clinical subtype.
Deletion or intragenic variant
The classic loss-of-function FOXG1 syndrome presentation includes deletions and intragenic mutations, with microcephaly, developmental delay, dyskinesia, epilepsy, and cerebral malformations.
Show evidence (1 reference)
PMID:31454984 SUPPORT Other
"In children with deletions or intragenic mutations of FOXG1, the recognized clinical features include microcephaly, developmental delay, severe cognitive disabilities, early-onset dyskinesia and hyperkinetic movements, stereotypies, epilepsy, and cerebral malformation."
This review distinguishes the deletion/intragenic mutation phenotype from duplication-associated presentations.
FOXG1 duplication-associated phenotype
FOXG1 duplication causes a related but clinically distinct FOXG1 dosage phenotype, often with different head size, neuroimaging, epilepsy, movement disorder, and neurodevelopmental features.
Show evidence (1 reference)
PMID:31454984 SUPPORT Other
"In contrast, children with duplications of FOXG1 are typically normocephalic and have normal brain magnetic resonance imaging. They also have different clinical characteristics in terms of epilepsy, movement disorders, and neurodevelopment compared with children with deletions or intragenic mutations."
The review supports FOXG1 duplication as a distinct dosage-related clinical presentation.

Pathophysiology

5
FOXG1 Transcription-Factor Dosage Disruption
Heterozygous FOXG1 loss-of-function variants, deletions, or duplications alter FOXG1 dosage and disrupt transcriptional regulation in the developing telencephalon and anterior forebrain.
FOXG1 link
telencephalon development link ⚠ ABNORMAL forebrain development link ⚠ ABNORMAL
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specific link ⚠ ABNORMAL
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:31454984 SUPPORT Other
"FOXG1 is a transcriptional factor. It is expressed mainly in the telencephalon and plays a pleiotropic role in the development of the brain. It is a key player in development and territorial specification of the anterior brain."
This supports FOXG1 as a transcription factor required for telencephalic and anterior forebrain development.
ORPHA:598164 SUPPORT Other
"FOXG1 | forkhead box G1 | hgnc:3811 | Disease-causing germline mutation(s) (loss of function) in"
Orphanet links loss-of-function FOXG1 variants to the intragenic subtype.
Cortical and Callosal Developmental Disruption
Disrupted FOXG1 function impairs neural progenitor expansion, neocortical neurogenesis, cortical layer formation, and corpus callosum formation, producing the forebrain and white-matter malformation component of FOXG1 disorder.
neural progenitor cell link
telencephalon development link ⚠ ABNORMAL forebrain development link ⚠ ABNORMAL
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:31454984 SUPPORT Other
"In addition, it maintains the expansion of the neural proliferating pool, and also regulates the pace of neocortical neuronogenic progression. It also facilitates cortical layer and corpus callosum formation."
This supports cortical and corpus callosum developmental disruption as a direct consequence of abnormal FOXG1 function.
PMID:21441262 SUPPORT Human Clinical
"Brain imaging studies reveal simplified gyral pattern and reduced white matter volume in the frontal lobes, corpus callosum hypogenesis, and variable mild frontal pachgyria."
The clinical cohort links FOXG1 disorder to simplified gyral pattern, frontal white-matter reduction, and corpus callosum hypogenesis.
Oligodendrocyte Maturation and Myelination Delay
FOXG1 deficiency delays oligodendrocyte precursor cell maturation and early myelin formation, providing a mechanism for the delayed myelination seen in neuroimaging studies.
oligodendrocyte precursor cell link oligodendrocyte link
oligodendrocyte differentiation link ↓ DECREASED myelination link ↓ DECREASED
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:37762220 SUPPORT Model Organism
"We found that Foxg1 deficiency resulted in a transient delay in myelination, evidenced by decreased myelin formation within the first two weeks after birth, but ultimately recovered to the control levels by P30."
Conditional mouse deletion shows that Foxg1 deficiency delays early postnatal myelination.
PMID:37762220 SUPPORT Model Organism
"We also found that Foxg1 deletion prevented the timely attenuation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα) signaling and reduced the cell cycle exit of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), leading to their excessive proliferation and delayed maturation."
This identifies a cellular mechanism in OPCs that delays oligodendrocyte maturation after Foxg1 deletion.
Synaptic and Motor-Circuit Dysfunction
FOXG1 frameshift models show dysregulated cortical synaptic, neuronal-projection, migration, and synaptic-vesicle gene programs, providing a mechanism for motor and behavioral phenotypes.
neuron link
synapse organization link ⚠ ABNORMAL
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:40404610 SUPPORT Model Organism
"Q84Pfs-Het cortex shows dysregulations of genes controlling cell proliferation, neuronal projection and migration, synaptic assembly, and synaptic vesicle transport."
The peer-reviewed mouse model supports a FOXG1-dependent synaptic and neuronal-development gene-program mechanism.
PMID:40404610 SUPPORT Model Organism
"Here, we report a patient-specific Q84Pfs heterozygous (Q84Pfs-Het) mouse model, which recapitulates various FS phenotypes across cellular, brain structural, and behavioral levels."
The model connects FOXG1 frameshift mutation to FS-like cellular, brain-structural, and behavioral phenotypes.
FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy
The integrated consequence of disrupted forebrain development, delayed myelination, and altered synaptic programs is a severe, non-degenerative developmental encephalopathy with intellectual and developmental disability, seizures, movement disorder, gastrointestinal issues, visual abnormalities, sleep problems, and behavioral features.
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:41136907 SUPPORT Human Clinical
"Core clinical phenotypes include IDD, gastrointestinal disorders, strabismus, epilepsy, movement disorders, and sleep problems."
The longitudinal cohort summarizes the major clinical endpoints of FOXG1 syndrome.
PMID:41136907 SUPPORT Human Clinical
"Employing the same composite measure, we demonstrate that FOXG1 syndrome is a static encephalopathy without evidence of neurodegeneration."
The longitudinal natural-history study supports a static developmental-encephalopathy course rather than a neurodegenerative one.

Pathograph

Use the checkboxes to hide or show graph categories. Hover nodes for evidence and cross-linked metadata.
Pathograph: causal mechanism network for FOXG1 Disorder Interactive directed graph showing how pathophysiology mechanisms, phenotypes, genetic factors and variants, experimental models, environmental triggers, and treatments relate through causal and linked edges.

Phenotypes

36
Digestive 3
Feeding difficulties VERY_FREQUENT Feeding difficulties (HP:0011968)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0011968 | Feeding difficulties | Very frequent (99-80%)"
Orphanet lists feeding difficulties as very frequent.
Constipation FREQUENT Constipation (HP:0002019)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0002019 | Constipation | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists constipation as frequent.
Gastroesophageal reflux FREQUENT Gastroesophageal reflux (HP:0002020)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0002020 | Gastroesophageal reflux | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists gastroesophageal reflux as frequent.
Eye 2
Strabismus VERY_FREQUENT Strabismus (HP:0000486)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0000486 | Strabismus | Very frequent (99-80%)"
Orphanet lists strabismus as very frequent.
Visual impairment FREQUENT Visual impairment (HP:0000505)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0000505 | Visual impairment | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists visual impairment as frequent.
Head and Neck 1
Excessive salivation FREQUENT Excessive salivation (HP:0003781)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0003781 | Excessive salivation | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists excessive salivation as frequent.
Musculoskeletal 2
Hypotonia VERY_FREQUENT Hypotonia (HP:0001252)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001252 | Hypotonia | Very frequent (99-80%)"
Orphanet lists hypotonia as very frequent.
Spasticity FREQUENT Spasticity (HP:0001257)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001257 | Spasticity | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists spasticity as frequent.
Nervous System 16
Severe global developmental delay FREQUENT Severe global developmental delay (HP:0011344)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0011344 | Severe global developmental delay | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists severe global developmental delay as frequent.
Dyskinesia VERY_FREQUENT Dyskinesia (HP:0100660)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0100660 | Dyskinesia | Very frequent (99-80%)"
Orphanet lists dyskinesia as very frequent.
Seizures FREQUENT Seizure (HP:0001250)
Show evidence (1 reference)
PMID:37308910 SUPPORT Human Clinical
"Caregivers described delayed or absent developmental milestone attainment, seizures (61%), and movement disorders (58%)."
The patient registry supports seizures as frequent in FOXG1 syndrome.
Absent speech FREQUENT Absent speech (HP:0001344)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001344 | Absent speech | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists absent speech as frequent.
Abnormal corpus callosum morphology FREQUENT Abnormal corpus callosum morphology (HP:0001273)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001273 | Abnormal corpus callosum morphology | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists abnormal corpus callosum morphology as frequent.
Delayed myelination FREQUENT Delayed myelination (HP:0012448)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0012448 | Delayed myelination | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists delayed myelination as frequent.
Autistic behavior FREQUENT Autistic behavior (HP:0000729)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0000729 | Autistic behavior | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists autistic behavior as frequent.
Motor delay VERY_FREQUENT Motor delay (HP:0001270)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001270 | Motor delay | Very frequent (99-80%)"
Orphanet lists motor delay as very frequent.
Gait disturbance VERY_FREQUENT Gait disturbance (HP:0001288)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001288 | Gait disturbance | Very frequent (99-80%)"
Orphanet lists gait disturbance as very frequent.
Choreoathetosis FREQUENT Choreoathetosis (HP:0001266)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001266 | Choreoathetosis | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists choreoathetosis as frequent.
Dystonia FREQUENT Dystonia (HP:0001332)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001332 | Dystonia | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists dystonia as frequent.
Myoclonus FREQUENT Myoclonus (HP:0001336)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0001336 | Myoclonus | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists myoclonus as frequent.
Bilateral tonic-clonic seizure FREQUENT Bilateral tonic-clonic seizure (HP:0002069)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0002069 | Bilateral tonic-clonic seizure | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists bilateral tonic-clonic seizure as frequent.
Focal-onset seizure FREQUENT Focal-onset seizure (HP:0007359)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0007359 | Focal-onset seizure | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists focal-onset seizure as frequent.
Sleep abnormality FREQUENT Sleep disturbance (HP:0002360)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0002360 | Sleep abnormality | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists sleep abnormality as frequent.
Cognitive impairment FREQUENT Cognitive impairment (HP:0100543)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0100543 | Cognitive impairment | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists cognitive impairment as frequent.
Growth 2
Short stature FREQUENT Short stature (HP:0004322)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0004322 | Short stature | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists short stature as frequent.
Decreased body weight FREQUENT Decreased body weight (HP:0004325)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0004325 | Decreased body weight | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists decreased body weight as frequent.
Other 10
Progressive microcephaly VERY_FREQUENT Progressive microcephaly (HP:0000253)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0000253 | Progressive microcephaly | Very frequent (99-80%)"
Orphanet lists progressive microcephaly as very frequent.
Hyperkinetic-dyskinetic movement disorder FREQUENT Hyperkinetic movements (HP:0002487)
Show evidence (2 references)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0002487 | Hyperkinetic movements | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists hyperkinetic movements as frequent.
PMID:26344814 SUPPORT Human Clinical
"A hyperkinetic-dyskinetic movement disorder emerges as a distinctive feature of the FOXG1-related phenotype."
The clinical movement-disorder series supports dyskinesia as a distinctive FOXG1 phenotype.
Motor stereotypy VERY_FREQUENT Motor stereotypy (HP:0000733)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0000733 | Abnormal repetitive mannerisms | Very frequent (99-80%)"
Orphanet lists abnormal repetitive mannerisms as very frequent.
Orofacial dyskinesia FREQUENT Orofacial dyskinesia (HP:0002310)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0002310 | Orofacial dyskinesia | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists orofacial dyskinesia as frequent.
Infantile spasms FREQUENT Infantile spasms (HP:0012469)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0012469 | Infantile spasms | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists infantile spasms as frequent.
Paroxysmal bursts of laughter FREQUENT Paroxysmal bursts of laughter (HP:0000749)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0000749 | Paroxysmal bursts of laughter | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists paroxysmal bursts of laughter as frequent.
Reduced eye contact FREQUENT Reduced eye contact (HP:0000817)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0000817 | Reduced eye contact | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists reduced eye contact as frequent.
Inappropriate crying FREQUENT Inappropriate crying (HP:0030215)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0030215 | Inappropriate crying | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists inappropriate crying as frequent.
Bruxism FREQUENT Bruxism (HP:0003763)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0003763 | Bruxism | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists bruxism as frequent.
Severe postnatal growth retardation FREQUENT Severe postnatal growth retardation (HP:0008850)
Show evidence (1 reference)
ORPHA:561854 SUPPORT Other
"HP:0008850 | Severe postnatal growth retardation | Frequent (79-30%)"
Orphanet lists severe postnatal growth retardation as frequent.
🧬

Genetic Associations

1
FOXG1 (Causal heterozygous pathogenic variant or dosage alteration)
Show evidence (2 references)
PMID:38843374 SUPPORT Other
"FOXG1 syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant."
GeneReviews supports FOXG1 pathogenic variants as the molecular cause.
PMID:37308910 SUPPORT Human Clinical
"Inclusion required documentation of a (likely) pathogenic variant in FOXG1."
The registry required molecular confirmation of FOXG1 pathogenicity.
💊

Treatments

4
Multidisciplinary supportive and rehabilitative care
Action: supportive care MAXO:0000950
Supportive care includes developmental and educational supports, rehabilitation, physical and occupational therapy, feeding support, reflux care, ophthalmology care, scoliosis monitoring, and family support.
Mechanism Target:
MODULATES FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy — Supportive care addresses developmental, motor, feeding, ophthalmologic, orthopedic, sleep, and behavioral complications without correcting FOXG1 dosage.
Show evidence (1 reference)
PMID:38843374 SUPPORT Other
"Treatment of manifestations: Developmental and educational support; consideration of anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy; treatment for seizures by an experienced neurologist; treatment of spasticity per orthopedist; physical medicine and rehabilitation, physical therapy, and occupational therapy to..."
GeneReviews summarizes multidisciplinary management for FOXG1 syndrome manifestations.
Antiseizure pharmacotherapy
Action: Pharmacotherapy NCIT:C15986
Agent: anticonvulsant agent
Seizures are managed by an experienced neurologist using standard antiseizure medication approaches tailored to seizure type and burden.
Mechanism Target:
MODULATES FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy — Antiseizure medications treat the epilepsy component of FOXG1 syndrome but do not correct the underlying FOXG1 dosage mechanism.
Show evidence (1 reference)
PMID:38843374 SUPPORT Other
"treatment for seizures by an experienced neurologist"
GeneReviews recommends neurologist-directed treatment for seizures.
Anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy
Action: Pharmacotherapy NCIT:C15986
Anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy may be considered for the prominent dyskinetic movement disorder in FOXG1 syndrome; specific agent selection is individualized because the cited GeneReviews management recommendation does not name a single preferred drug.
Mechanism Target:
MODULATES Synaptic and Motor-Circuit Dysfunction — Anti-dyskinetic medication addresses the movement-disorder endpoint of FOXG1 motor-circuit dysfunction without correcting FOXG1 dosage.
Show evidence (1 reference)
PMID:38843374 SUPPORT Other
"consideration of anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy"
GeneReviews explicitly lists anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy as a management consideration for FOXG1 syndrome manifestations.
AAV9 FOXG1 gene therapy candidate FRF-001
Action: genetic therapy Ontology label: gene therapy MAXO:0001001
FRF-001 is an investigational intracerebroventricular AAV9 gene-therapy candidate being evaluated for safety, tolerability, and efficacy in FOXG1 syndrome; it is not an established approved treatment.
Mechanism Target:
MODULATES FOXG1 Transcription-Factor Dosage Disruption — The investigational approach aims to address the upstream FOXG1 dosage lesion.
Show evidence (1 reference)
clinicaltrials:NCT07293546 SUPPORT Human Clinical
"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if FRF-001 is a safe, tolerable, and efficacious treatment for children and adults with FOXG1 syndrome."
The ClinicalTrials.gov record establishes FRF-001 as an investigational FOXG1 syndrome treatment candidate.
🔬

Clinical Trials

1
NCT07293546 PHASE_I NOT_RECRUITING
First-in-human phase 1/2 open-label study of FRF-001, an AAV9 gene therapy administered by intracerebroventricular injection, in FOXG1 syndrome. ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study as not yet recruiting; the schema maps that to NOT_RECRUITING.
Show evidence (1 reference)
clinicaltrials:NCT07293546 SUPPORT Human Clinical
"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if FRF-001 is a safe, tolerable, and efficacious treatment for children and adults with FOXG1 syndrome."
The ClinicalTrials.gov summary documents the investigational FRF-001 trial objective and FOXG1 syndrome population.
{ }

Source YAML

click to show
name: FOXG1 Disorder
creation_date: "2026-05-10T00:00:00Z"
updated_date: "2026-05-10T00:00:00Z"
description: >-
  FOXG1 disorder is a rare monogenic neurodevelopmental disorder caused by
  heterozygous pathogenic variants, deletions, or copy-number changes affecting
  FOXG1 dosage. The core mechanism is disrupted FOXG1-dependent transcriptional
  control during forebrain development, leading to cortical and corpus callosum
  malformations, delayed myelination, severe developmental disability, movement
  disorder, epilepsy, feeding problems, and visual abnormalities.
category: Genetic
parents:
- Mendelian neurodevelopmental disorder
- atypical Rett syndrome
- congenital nervous system disorder
- pervasive developmental disorder
disease_term:
  preferred_term: FOXG1 disorder
  term:
    id: MONDO:0100040
    label: FOXG1 disorder
has_subtypes:
- name: Intragenic alteration
  display_name: FOXG1 syndrome due to intragenic alteration
  description: >-
    FOXG1 syndrome caused by an intragenic FOXG1 alteration; Orphanet lists
    this as a clinical subtype with autosomal dominant inheritance and
    disease-causing loss-of-function FOXG1 variants.
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:598164
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome due to intragenic alteration
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "FOXG1 | forkhead box G1 | hgnc:3811 | Disease-causing germline mutation(s) (loss of function) in"
    explanation: >-
      The Orphanet subtype record directly links intragenic FOXG1 loss of
      function to this clinical subtype.
- name: Deletion or intragenic variant
  description: >-
    The classic loss-of-function FOXG1 syndrome presentation includes
    deletions and intragenic mutations, with microcephaly, developmental delay,
    dyskinesia, epilepsy, and cerebral malformations.
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:31454984
    reference_title: "FOXG1-Related Syndrome: From Clinical to Molecular Genetics and Pathogenic Mechanisms."
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: >-
      In children with deletions or intragenic mutations of FOXG1, the recognized clinical features include microcephaly, developmental delay, severe cognitive disabilities, early-onset dyskinesia and hyperkinetic movements, stereotypies, epilepsy, and cerebral malformation.
    explanation: >-
      This review distinguishes the deletion/intragenic mutation phenotype
      from duplication-associated presentations.
- name: Duplication
  display_name: FOXG1 duplication-associated phenotype
  description: >-
    FOXG1 duplication causes a related but clinically distinct FOXG1 dosage
    phenotype, often with different head size, neuroimaging, epilepsy, movement
    disorder, and neurodevelopmental features.
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:31454984
    reference_title: "FOXG1-Related Syndrome: From Clinical to Molecular Genetics and Pathogenic Mechanisms."
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: >-
      In contrast, children with duplications of FOXG1 are typically normocephalic and have normal brain magnetic resonance imaging. They also have different clinical characteristics in terms of epilepsy, movement disorders, and neurodevelopment compared with children with deletions or intragenic mutations.
    explanation: >-
      The review supports FOXG1 duplication as a distinct dosage-related
      clinical presentation.
inheritance:
- name: Autosomal dominant
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:598164
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome due to intragenic alteration
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "Autosomal dominant"
    explanation: >-
      Orphanet lists autosomal dominant inheritance for the intragenic
      FOXG1 subtype.
  - reference: PMID:38843374
    reference_title: FOXG1 Syndrome.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: >-
      FOXG1 syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant.
    explanation: >-
      GeneReviews supports autosomal dominant inheritance and notes that most
      probands have a de novo FOXG1 pathogenic variant.
pathophysiology:
- name: FOXG1 Transcription-Factor Dosage Disruption
  description: >-
    Heterozygous FOXG1 loss-of-function variants, deletions, or duplications
    alter FOXG1 dosage and disrupt transcriptional regulation in the developing
    telencephalon and anterior forebrain.
  genes:
  - preferred_term: FOXG1
    term:
      id: hgnc:3811
      label: FOXG1
  molecular_functions:
  - preferred_term: DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specific
    term:
      id: GO:0000981
      label: DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specific
    modifier: ABNORMAL
  biological_processes:
  - preferred_term: telencephalon development
    term:
      id: GO:0021537
      label: telencephalon development
    modifier: ABNORMAL
  - preferred_term: forebrain development
    term:
      id: GO:0030900
      label: forebrain development
    modifier: ABNORMAL
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:31454984
    reference_title: "FOXG1-Related Syndrome: From Clinical to Molecular Genetics and Pathogenic Mechanisms."
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: >-
      FOXG1 is a transcriptional factor. It is expressed mainly in the telencephalon and plays a pleiotropic role in the development of the brain. It is a key player in development and territorial specification of the anterior brain.
    explanation: >-
      This supports FOXG1 as a transcription factor required for
      telencephalic and anterior forebrain development.
  - reference: ORPHA:598164
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome due to intragenic alteration
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "FOXG1 | forkhead box G1 | hgnc:3811 | Disease-causing germline mutation(s) (loss of function) in"
    explanation: >-
      Orphanet links loss-of-function FOXG1 variants to the intragenic subtype.
  downstream:
  - target: Cortical and Callosal Developmental Disruption
    causal_link_type: DIRECT
    description: FOXG1 dosage disruption perturbs cortical neurogenesis, cortical layer formation, and corpus callosum formation.
    evidence:
    - reference: PMID:31454984
      reference_title: "FOXG1-Related Syndrome: From Clinical to Molecular Genetics and Pathogenic Mechanisms."
      supports: SUPPORT
      evidence_source: OTHER
      snippet: >-
        In addition, it maintains the expansion of the neural proliferating pool, and also regulates the pace of neocortical neuronogenic progression. It also facilitates cortical layer and corpus callosum formation.
      explanation: >-
        The review directly connects FOXG1 function to cortical neurogenesis,
        cortical layering, and corpus callosum formation.
  - target: Oligodendrocyte Maturation and Myelination Delay
    causal_link_type: INDIRECT_KNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
    description: FOXG1 dosage disruption affects oligodendrocyte lineage maturation and myelin development.
    evidence:
    - reference: PMID:37762220
      reference_title: Conditional Deletion of Foxg1 Delayed Myelination during Early Postnatal Brain Development.
      supports: SUPPORT
      evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
      snippet: >-
        We also found that Foxg1 deletion prevented the timely attenuation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα) signaling and reduced the cell cycle exit of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), leading to their excessive proliferation and delayed maturation.
      explanation: >-
        The conditional deletion model supports delayed OPC maturation as a
        downstream consequence of Foxg1 loss.
  - target: Synaptic and Motor-Circuit Dysfunction
    causal_link_type: INDIRECT_KNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
    description: FOXG1 dosage disruption changes cortical synaptic gene programs that contribute to motor and behavioral phenotypes.
    evidence:
    - reference: PMID:40404610
      reference_title: The patient-specific mouse model with Foxg1 frameshift mutation provides insights into the pathophysiology of FOXG1 syndrome.
      supports: SUPPORT
      evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
      snippet: >-
        Q84Pfs-Het cortex shows dysregulations of genes controlling cell proliferation, neuronal projection and migration, synaptic assembly, and synaptic vesicle transport.
      explanation: >-
        The peer-reviewed mouse model links FOXG1 frameshift mutation to
        cortical synaptic and neuronal gene-program disruption.
- name: Cortical and Callosal Developmental Disruption
  description: >-
    Disrupted FOXG1 function impairs neural progenitor expansion, neocortical
    neurogenesis, cortical layer formation, and corpus callosum formation,
    producing the forebrain and white-matter malformation component of FOXG1
    disorder.
  cell_types:
  - preferred_term: neural progenitor cell
    term:
      id: CL:0011020
      label: neural progenitor cell
  biological_processes:
  - preferred_term: telencephalon development
    term:
      id: GO:0021537
      label: telencephalon development
    modifier: ABNORMAL
  - preferred_term: forebrain development
    term:
      id: GO:0030900
      label: forebrain development
    modifier: ABNORMAL
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:31454984
    reference_title: "FOXG1-Related Syndrome: From Clinical to Molecular Genetics and Pathogenic Mechanisms."
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: >-
      In addition, it maintains the expansion of the neural proliferating pool, and also regulates the pace of neocortical neuronogenic progression. It also facilitates cortical layer and corpus callosum formation.
    explanation: >-
      This supports cortical and corpus callosum developmental disruption as
      a direct consequence of abnormal FOXG1 function.
  - reference: PMID:21441262
    reference_title: >-
      The core FOXG1 syndrome phenotype consists of postnatal microcephaly,
      severe mental retardation, absent language, dyskinesia, and corpus
      callosum hypogenesis.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
    snippet: >-
      Brain imaging studies reveal simplified gyral pattern and reduced white matter volume in the frontal lobes, corpus callosum hypogenesis, and variable mild frontal pachgyria.
    explanation: >-
      The clinical cohort links FOXG1 disorder to simplified gyral pattern,
      frontal white-matter reduction, and corpus callosum hypogenesis.
  downstream:
  - target: FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy
    causal_link_type: INDIRECT_KNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
    description: Cortical and callosal malformations contribute to severe developmental disability, absent speech, seizures, and motor impairment.
- name: Oligodendrocyte Maturation and Myelination Delay
  description: >-
    FOXG1 deficiency delays oligodendrocyte precursor cell maturation and early
    myelin formation, providing a mechanism for the delayed myelination seen in
    neuroimaging studies.
  cell_types:
  - preferred_term: oligodendrocyte precursor cell
    term:
      id: CL:0002453
      label: oligodendrocyte precursor cell
  - preferred_term: oligodendrocyte
    term:
      id: CL:0000128
      label: oligodendrocyte
  biological_processes:
  - preferred_term: oligodendrocyte differentiation
    term:
      id: GO:0048709
      label: oligodendrocyte differentiation
    modifier: DECREASED
  - preferred_term: myelination
    term:
      id: GO:0042552
      label: myelination
    modifier: DECREASED
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:37762220
    reference_title: Conditional Deletion of Foxg1 Delayed Myelination during Early Postnatal Brain Development.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
    snippet: >-
      We found that Foxg1 deficiency resulted in a transient delay in myelination, evidenced by decreased myelin formation within the first two weeks after birth, but ultimately recovered to the control levels by P30.
    explanation: >-
      Conditional mouse deletion shows that Foxg1 deficiency delays early
      postnatal myelination.
  - reference: PMID:37762220
    reference_title: Conditional Deletion of Foxg1 Delayed Myelination during Early Postnatal Brain Development.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
    snippet: >-
      We also found that Foxg1 deletion prevented the timely attenuation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα) signaling and reduced the cell cycle exit of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), leading to their excessive proliferation and delayed maturation.
    explanation: >-
      This identifies a cellular mechanism in OPCs that delays oligodendrocyte
      maturation after Foxg1 deletion.
  downstream:
  - target: FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy
    causal_link_type: INDIRECT_KNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
    description: Delayed myelination contributes to impaired neural circuit function in the static encephalopathy.
- name: Synaptic and Motor-Circuit Dysfunction
  description: >-
    FOXG1 frameshift models show dysregulated cortical synaptic,
    neuronal-projection, migration, and synaptic-vesicle gene programs,
    providing a mechanism for motor and behavioral phenotypes.
  cell_types:
  - preferred_term: neuron
    term:
      id: CL:0000540
      label: neuron
  biological_processes:
  - preferred_term: synapse organization
    term:
      id: GO:0050808
      label: synapse organization
    modifier: ABNORMAL
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:40404610
    reference_title: The patient-specific mouse model with Foxg1 frameshift mutation provides insights into the pathophysiology of FOXG1 syndrome.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
    snippet: >-
      Q84Pfs-Het cortex shows dysregulations of genes controlling cell proliferation, neuronal projection and migration, synaptic assembly, and synaptic vesicle transport.
    explanation: >-
      The peer-reviewed mouse model supports a FOXG1-dependent synaptic
      and neuronal-development gene-program mechanism.
  - reference: PMID:40404610
    reference_title: The patient-specific mouse model with Foxg1 frameshift mutation provides insights into the pathophysiology of FOXG1 syndrome.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
    snippet: >-
      Here, we report a patient-specific Q84Pfs heterozygous (Q84Pfs-Het) mouse model, which recapitulates various FS phenotypes across cellular, brain structural, and behavioral levels.
    explanation: >-
      The model connects FOXG1 frameshift mutation to FS-like cellular,
      brain-structural, and behavioral phenotypes.
  downstream:
  - target: FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy
    causal_link_type: INDIRECT_KNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
    description: Synaptic and motor-circuit dysfunction contributes to dyskinesia, stereotypies, epilepsy, and severe neurodevelopmental disability.
- name: FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy
  description: >-
    The integrated consequence of disrupted forebrain development, delayed
    myelination, and altered synaptic programs is a severe, non-degenerative
    developmental encephalopathy with intellectual and developmental
    disability, seizures, movement disorder, gastrointestinal issues, visual
    abnormalities, sleep problems, and behavioral features.
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:41136907
    reference_title: "Longitudinal characterization of clinical, developmental, and behavioral phenotypes in 101 children and adults with FOXG1 syndrome."
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
    snippet: >-
      Core clinical phenotypes include IDD, gastrointestinal disorders, strabismus, epilepsy, movement disorders, and sleep problems.
    explanation: >-
      The longitudinal cohort summarizes the major clinical endpoints of
      FOXG1 syndrome.
  - reference: PMID:41136907
    reference_title: "Longitudinal characterization of clinical, developmental, and behavioral phenotypes in 101 children and adults with FOXG1 syndrome."
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
    snippet: >-
      Employing the same composite measure, we demonstrate that FOXG1 syndrome is a static encephalopathy without evidence of neurodegeneration.
    explanation: >-
      The longitudinal natural-history study supports a static
      developmental-encephalopathy course rather than a neurodegenerative one.
phenotypes:
- category: Neurological
  name: Progressive microcephaly
  description: Progressive postnatal microcephaly is a core FOXG1 syndrome feature.
  frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: progressive microcephaly
    term:
      id: HP:0000253
      label: Progressive microcephaly
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0000253 | Progressive microcephaly | Very frequent (99-80%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists progressive microcephaly as very frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Severe global developmental delay
  description: Severe global developmental delay is a major neurodevelopmental manifestation.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: severe global developmental delay
    term:
      id: HP:0011344
      label: Severe global developmental delay
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0011344 | Severe global developmental delay | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists severe global developmental delay as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Dyskinesia
  description: Dyskinesia is a very frequent movement abnormality in FOXG1 syndrome.
  frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: dyskinesia
    term:
      id: HP:0100660
      label: Dyskinesia
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0100660 | Dyskinesia | Very frequent (99-80%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists dyskinesia as very frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Hyperkinetic-dyskinetic movement disorder
  description: A combined hyperkinetic and dyskinetic movement disorder is distinctive.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: hyperkinetic movements
    term:
      id: HP:0002487
      label: Hyperkinetic movements
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0002487 | Hyperkinetic movements | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists hyperkinetic movements as frequent.
  - reference: PMID:26344814
    reference_title: The hyperkinetic movement disorder of FOXG1-related epileptic-dyskinetic encephalopathy.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
    snippet: >-
      A hyperkinetic-dyskinetic movement disorder emerges as a distinctive feature of the FOXG1-related phenotype.
    explanation: >-
      The clinical movement-disorder series supports dyskinesia as a
      distinctive FOXG1 phenotype.
- category: Neurological
  name: Hypotonia
  description: Hypotonia is a common early neurologic feature.
  frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: hypotonia
    term:
      id: HP:0001252
      label: Hypotonia
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001252 | Hypotonia | Very frequent (99-80%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists hypotonia as very frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Seizures
  description: Seizures are frequent and show genotype-dependent burden.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: seizures
    term:
      id: HP:0001250
      label: Seizure
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:37308910
    reference_title: "Expanding genotype-phenotype correlations in FOXG1 syndrome: results from a patient registry."
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
    snippet: >-
      Caregivers described delayed or absent developmental milestone attainment, seizures (61%), and movement disorders (58%).
    explanation: >-
      The patient registry supports seizures as frequent in FOXG1 syndrome.
- category: Neurological
  name: Absent speech
  description: Many affected individuals have minimal or absent speech.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: absent speech
    term:
      id: HP:0001344
      label: Absent speech
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001344 | Absent speech | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists absent speech as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Abnormal corpus callosum morphology
  description: Corpus callosum hypogenesis or related callosal abnormalities are common imaging findings.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: abnormal corpus callosum morphology
    term:
      id: HP:0001273
      label: Abnormal corpus callosum morphology
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001273 | Abnormal corpus callosum morphology | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists abnormal corpus callosum morphology as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Delayed myelination
  description: Delayed myelination is a recurrent neuroimaging abnormality.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: delayed myelination
    term:
      id: HP:0012448
      label: Delayed myelination
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0012448 | Delayed myelination | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists delayed myelination as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Motor stereotypy
  description: Repetitive mannerisms and stereotypic movements are very frequent.
  frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: abnormal repetitive mannerisms
    term:
      id: HP:0000733
      label: Motor stereotypy
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0000733 | Abnormal repetitive mannerisms | Very frequent (99-80%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists abnormal repetitive mannerisms as very frequent.
- category: Behavioral
  name: Autistic behavior
  description: Autistic features and impaired social reciprocity occur in the FOXG1 phenotype.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: autistic behavior
    term:
      id: HP:0000729
      label: Autistic behavior
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0000729 | Autistic behavior | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists autistic behavior as frequent.
- category: Ophthalmologic
  name: Strabismus
  description: Strabismus is a very frequent ophthalmologic feature.
  frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: strabismus
    term:
      id: HP:0000486
      label: Strabismus
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0000486 | Strabismus | Very frequent (99-80%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists strabismus as very frequent.
- category: Ophthalmologic
  name: Visual impairment
  description: Visual impairment and cortical visual impairment are recognized manifestations.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: visual impairment
    term:
      id: HP:0000505
      label: Visual impairment
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0000505 | Visual impairment | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists visual impairment as frequent.
- category: Gastrointestinal
  name: Feeding difficulties
  description: Feeding difficulties and poor weight gain are very frequent.
  frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: feeding difficulties
    term:
      id: HP:0011968
      label: Feeding difficulties
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0011968 | Feeding difficulties | Very frequent (99-80%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists feeding difficulties as very frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Motor delay
  description: Motor delay is a very frequent developmental manifestation.
  frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: motor delay
    term:
      id: HP:0001270
      label: Motor delay
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001270 | Motor delay | Very frequent (99-80%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists motor delay as very frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Gait disturbance
  description: Gait disturbance reflects the severe motor impairment in FOXG1 syndrome.
  frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: gait disturbance
    term:
      id: HP:0001288
      label: Gait disturbance
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001288 | Gait disturbance | Very frequent (99-80%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists gait disturbance as very frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Spasticity
  description: Spasticity is a frequent pyramidal motor feature.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: spasticity
    term:
      id: HP:0001257
      label: Spasticity
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001257 | Spasticity | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists spasticity as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Choreoathetosis
  description: Choreoathetosis is part of the complex involuntary-movement phenotype.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: choreoathetosis
    term:
      id: HP:0001266
      label: Choreoathetosis
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001266 | Choreoathetosis | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists choreoathetosis as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Dystonia
  description: Dystonia is a frequent component of the movement disorder.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: dystonia
    term:
      id: HP:0001332
      label: Dystonia
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001332 | Dystonia | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists dystonia as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Myoclonus
  description: Myoclonus occurs as a frequent abnormal movement or seizure-associated manifestation.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: myoclonus
    term:
      id: HP:0001336
      label: Myoclonus
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0001336 | Myoclonus | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists myoclonus as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Orofacial dyskinesia
  description: Orofacial dyskinesia is a frequent cranial movement manifestation.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: orofacial dyskinesia
    term:
      id: HP:0002310
      label: Orofacial dyskinesia
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0002310 | Orofacial dyskinesia | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists orofacial dyskinesia as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Infantile spasms
  description: Infantile spasms are a frequent seizure type in FOXG1 syndrome.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: infantile spasms
    term:
      id: HP:0012469
      label: Infantile spasms
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0012469 | Infantile spasms | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists infantile spasms as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Bilateral tonic-clonic seizure
  description: Bilateral tonic-clonic seizures are a frequent seizure type.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: bilateral tonic-clonic seizure
    term:
      id: HP:0002069
      label: Bilateral tonic-clonic seizure
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0002069 | Bilateral tonic-clonic seizure | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists bilateral tonic-clonic seizure as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Focal-onset seizure
  description: Focal-onset seizures are a frequent seizure type.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: focal-onset seizure
    term:
      id: HP:0007359
      label: Focal-onset seizure
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0007359 | Focal-onset seizure | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists focal-onset seizure as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Sleep abnormality
  description: Sleep problems are frequent in the neurobehavioral phenotype.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: sleep abnormality
    term:
      id: HP:0002360
      label: Sleep disturbance
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0002360 | Sleep abnormality | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists sleep abnormality as frequent.
- category: Behavioral
  name: Paroxysmal bursts of laughter
  description: Paroxysmal bursts of laughter are a frequent behavioral manifestation.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: paroxysmal bursts of laughter
    term:
      id: HP:0000749
      label: Paroxysmal bursts of laughter
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0000749 | Paroxysmal bursts of laughter | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists paroxysmal bursts of laughter as frequent.
- category: Behavioral
  name: Reduced eye contact
  description: Reduced eye contact is a frequent social-communication feature.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: reduced eye contact
    term:
      id: HP:0000817
      label: Reduced eye contact
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0000817 | Reduced eye contact | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists reduced eye contact as frequent.
- category: Behavioral
  name: Inappropriate crying
  description: Inappropriate crying episodes are frequent.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: inappropriate crying
    term:
      id: HP:0030215
      label: Inappropriate crying
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0030215 | Inappropriate crying | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists inappropriate crying as frequent.
- category: Gastrointestinal
  name: Constipation
  description: Constipation is a frequent gastrointestinal manifestation.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: constipation
    term:
      id: HP:0002019
      label: Constipation
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0002019 | Constipation | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists constipation as frequent.
- category: Gastrointestinal
  name: Gastroesophageal reflux
  description: Gastroesophageal reflux is a frequent gastrointestinal manifestation.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: gastroesophageal reflux
    term:
      id: HP:0002020
      label: Gastroesophageal reflux
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0002020 | Gastroesophageal reflux | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists gastroesophageal reflux as frequent.
- category: Gastrointestinal
  name: Bruxism
  description: Bruxism is a frequent oral-motor manifestation.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: bruxism
    term:
      id: HP:0003763
      label: Bruxism
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0003763 | Bruxism | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists bruxism as frequent.
- category: Gastrointestinal
  name: Excessive salivation
  description: Excessive salivation is frequent.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: excessive salivation
    term:
      id: HP:0003781
      label: Excessive salivation
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0003781 | Excessive salivation | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists excessive salivation as frequent.
- category: Growth
  name: Short stature
  description: Short stature is a frequent growth finding.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: short stature
    term:
      id: HP:0004322
      label: Short stature
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0004322 | Short stature | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists short stature as frequent.
- category: Growth
  name: Decreased body weight
  description: Decreased body weight is frequent and overlaps with feeding difficulty and poor weight gain.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: decreased body weight
    term:
      id: HP:0004325
      label: Decreased body weight
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0004325 | Decreased body weight | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists decreased body weight as frequent.
- category: Growth
  name: Severe postnatal growth retardation
  description: Severe postnatal growth retardation is frequent.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: severe postnatal growth retardation
    term:
      id: HP:0008850
      label: Severe postnatal growth retardation
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0008850 | Severe postnatal growth retardation | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists severe postnatal growth retardation as frequent.
- category: Neurological
  name: Cognitive impairment
  description: Cognitive impairment is a frequent developmental endpoint.
  frequency: FREQUENT
  phenotype_term:
    preferred_term: cognitive impairment
    term:
      id: HP:0100543
      label: Cognitive impairment
  evidence:
  - reference: ORPHA:561854
    reference_title: FOXG1 syndrome
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: "HP:0100543 | Cognitive impairment | Frequent (79-30%)"
    explanation: Orphanet lists cognitive impairment as frequent.
genetic:
- name: FOXG1
  association: Causal heterozygous pathogenic variant or dosage alteration
  gene_term:
    preferred_term: FOXG1
    term:
      id: hgnc:3811
      label: FOXG1
  notes: >-
    FOXG1 disorder is typically caused by de novo heterozygous intragenic
    variants, deletions, or duplications affecting FOXG1 dosage; germline
    mosaicism can create recurrence risk.
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:38843374
    reference_title: FOXG1 Syndrome.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: >-
      FOXG1 syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant.
    explanation: >-
      GeneReviews supports FOXG1 pathogenic variants as the molecular cause.
  - reference: PMID:37308910
    reference_title: "Expanding genotype-phenotype correlations in FOXG1 syndrome: results from a patient registry."
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
    snippet: >-
      Inclusion required documentation of a (likely) pathogenic variant in FOXG1.
    explanation: >-
      The registry required molecular confirmation of FOXG1 pathogenicity.
diagnosis:
- name: Molecular genetic testing
  description: >-
    Diagnosis is established by clinical or characteristic neuroimaging
    findings together with molecular genetic testing showing a heterozygous
    pathogenic FOXG1 variant or dosage alteration.
  diagnosis_term:
    preferred_term: genetic testing
    term:
      id: MAXO:0000127
      label: genetic testing
  results: Genetic testing identifies heterozygous pathogenic FOXG1 sequence variants, deletions, or duplications.
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:38843374
    reference_title: FOXG1 Syndrome.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: OTHER
    snippet: >-
      The diagnosis of FOXG1 syndrome is established in a proband with clinical and/or characteristic neuroimaging findings and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in FOXG1 identified by molecular genetic testing.
    explanation: >-
      GeneReviews directly describes the molecular diagnostic criterion.
- name: Brain MRI for FOXG1-associated malformations
  description: >-
    Brain MRI helps identify characteristic corpus callosum abnormalities,
    simplified gyral pattern, frontal white-matter reduction, delayed
    myelination, or related malformations.
  diagnosis_term:
    preferred_term: magnetic resonance imaging procedure
    term:
      id: MAXO:0000424
      label: magnetic resonance imaging procedure
  results: MRI may show corpus callosum hypogenesis, simplified gyral pattern, reduced frontal white matter, delayed myelination, or pachygyria.
  evidence:
  - reference: PMID:21441262
    reference_title: >-
      The core FOXG1 syndrome phenotype consists of postnatal microcephaly,
      severe mental retardation, absent language, dyskinesia, and corpus
      callosum hypogenesis.
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
    snippet: >-
      Brain imaging studies reveal simplified gyral pattern and reduced white matter volume in the frontal lobes, corpus callosum hypogenesis, and variable mild frontal pachgyria.
    explanation: >-
      This clinical series supports characteristic structural neuroimaging
      findings for FOXG1 syndrome.
treatments:
- name: Multidisciplinary supportive and rehabilitative care
  description: >-
    Supportive care includes developmental and educational supports,
    rehabilitation, physical and occupational therapy, feeding support,
    reflux care, ophthalmology care, scoliosis monitoring, and family support.
  treatment_term:
    preferred_term: supportive care
    term:
      id: MAXO:0000950
      label: supportive care
  target_mechanisms:
  - target: FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy
    treatment_effect: MODULATES
    description: Supportive care addresses developmental, motor, feeding, ophthalmologic, orthopedic, sleep, and behavioral complications without correcting FOXG1 dosage.
    evidence:
    - reference: PMID:38843374
      reference_title: FOXG1 Syndrome.
      supports: SUPPORT
      evidence_source: OTHER
      snippet: >-
        Treatment of manifestations: Developmental and educational support; consideration of anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy; treatment for seizures by an experienced neurologist; treatment of spasticity per orthopedist; physical medicine and rehabilitation, physical therapy, and occupational therapy to help avoid contractures and falls; anti-spasmodic pharmacotherapy; feeding therapy with gastrostomy tube placement as needed; standard treatment of gastroesophageal reflux; treatment for refractive errors and strabismus per ophthalmologist; standard treatments for scoliosis; social work and family support.
      explanation: >-
        GeneReviews summarizes multidisciplinary management for FOXG1
        syndrome manifestations.
- name: Antiseizure pharmacotherapy
  description: >-
    Seizures are managed by an experienced neurologist using standard
    antiseizure medication approaches tailored to seizure type and burden.
  treatment_term:
    preferred_term: Pharmacotherapy
    term:
      id: NCIT:C15986
      label: Pharmacotherapy
    therapeutic_agent:
    - preferred_term: anticonvulsant agent
      term:
        id: NCIT:C264
        label: Anticonvulsant Agent
  target_mechanisms:
  - target: FOXG1 Static Neurodevelopmental Encephalopathy
    treatment_effect: MODULATES
    description: Antiseizure medications treat the epilepsy component of FOXG1 syndrome but do not correct the underlying FOXG1 dosage mechanism.
    evidence:
    - reference: PMID:38843374
      reference_title: FOXG1 Syndrome.
      supports: SUPPORT
      evidence_source: OTHER
      snippet: >-
        treatment for seizures by an experienced neurologist
      explanation: >-
        GeneReviews recommends neurologist-directed treatment for seizures.
- name: Anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy
  description: >-
    Anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy may be considered for the prominent
    dyskinetic movement disorder in FOXG1 syndrome; specific agent selection is
    individualized because the cited GeneReviews management recommendation does
    not name a single preferred drug.
  treatment_term:
    preferred_term: Pharmacotherapy
    term:
      id: NCIT:C15986
      label: Pharmacotherapy
  target_mechanisms:
  - target: Synaptic and Motor-Circuit Dysfunction
    treatment_effect: MODULATES
    description: Anti-dyskinetic medication addresses the movement-disorder endpoint of FOXG1 motor-circuit dysfunction without correcting FOXG1 dosage.
    evidence:
    - reference: PMID:38843374
      reference_title: FOXG1 Syndrome.
      supports: SUPPORT
      evidence_source: OTHER
      snippet: >-
        consideration of anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy
      explanation: >-
        GeneReviews explicitly lists anti-dyskinetic pharmacotherapy as a
        management consideration for FOXG1 syndrome manifestations.
- name: AAV9 FOXG1 gene therapy candidate FRF-001
  description: >-
    FRF-001 is an investigational intracerebroventricular AAV9 gene-therapy
    candidate being evaluated for safety, tolerability, and efficacy in FOXG1
    syndrome; it is not an established approved treatment.
  treatment_term:
    preferred_term: genetic therapy
    term:
      id: MAXO:0001001
      label: gene therapy
  target_mechanisms:
  - target: FOXG1 Transcription-Factor Dosage Disruption
    treatment_effect: MODULATES
    description: The investigational approach aims to address the upstream FOXG1 dosage lesion.
    evidence:
    - reference: clinicaltrials:NCT07293546
      supports: SUPPORT
      evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
      snippet: >-
        The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if FRF-001 is a safe, tolerable, and efficacious treatment for children and adults with FOXG1 syndrome.
      explanation: >-
        The ClinicalTrials.gov record establishes FRF-001 as an investigational
        FOXG1 syndrome treatment candidate.
clinical_trials:
- name: NCT07293546
  phase: PHASE_I
  status: NOT_RECRUITING
  description: >-
    First-in-human phase 1/2 open-label study of FRF-001, an AAV9 gene
    therapy administered by intracerebroventricular injection, in FOXG1
    syndrome. ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study as not yet recruiting; the
    schema maps that to NOT_RECRUITING.
  evidence:
  - reference: clinicaltrials:NCT07293546
    supports: SUPPORT
    evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
    snippet: >-
      The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if FRF-001 is a safe, tolerable, and efficacious treatment for children and adults with FOXG1 syndrome.
    explanation: >-
      The ClinicalTrials.gov summary documents the investigational FRF-001
      trial objective and FOXG1 syndrome population.
notes: >-
  Deep-research attempts used the required repo workflow. Falcon and OpenAI
  provider attempts produced no substantive output within bounded waits and
  were terminated to avoid a long silent block. The Asta provider completed and
  generated research/FOXG1_Disorder-deep-research-asta.md; this curation uses
  that artifact plus targeted PubMed, Orphanet, GeneReviews, and
  ClinicalTrials.gov evidence.
📚

References & Deep Research

Deep Research

1
Asta
Asta Literature Retrieval: Pathophysiology and clinical mechanisms of FOXG1 Disorder. Core disease mechanisms, molecular and cellular pathways,...
Asta Scientific Corpus Retrieval 18 citations 2026-05-10T16:02:11.545956

Asta Literature Retrieval: Pathophysiology and clinical mechanisms of FOXG1 Disorder. Core disease mechanisms, molecular and cellular pathways,...

This report is retrieval-only and is generated directly from Asta results.

  • Papers retrieved: 18
  • Snippets retrieved: 20

Relevant Papers

[1] Drug repurposing in Rett and Rett-like syndromes: a promising yet underrated opportunity?

  • Authors: Claudia Fuchs, P. A. ‛. ’t Hoen, A. Müller, Friederike Ehrhart, C. V. van Karnebeek
  • Year: 2024
  • Venue: Frontiers in Medicine
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b00d0859458647edeebf3cf53f9b39c79311d5ed
  • DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1425038
  • PMID: 39135718
  • PMCID: 11317438
  • Citations: 1
  • Summary: The potential of drug repurposing (DR) as a promising avenue for addressing the unmet medical needs of individuals with RTT and related disorders is explored and Leveraging existing drugs for new therapeutic purposes presents an attractive strategy.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.497) > Rett syndrome (RTT, #312750) and Rett-like syndromes, e.g., CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD, #300672) and FOXG1-syndrome (or FOXG1-related encephalopathy, #613454) are rare monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The relative recent recognition of their distinct clinical entities (1,2) has deepened our understanding of their underlying pathogenic mechanisms and clinical characteristics (Table 1). Although each disorder exhibits unique clinical features, they share common core symptoms and neurological traits (Table 1), suggesting that these disorders share critical molecular etiology. > Identifying shared pathways holds significant implications for targeted therapies development and drug repurposing (DR). DR, which involves using existing drugs for new therapeutic purposes, represents a promising approach in the treatment across multiple diseases especially for neurological disorders (3,4). The complex structure of the central nervous system (CNS), coupled with the challenge of penetrating the blood-brain barrier, poses significant hurdles in the development of new drugs for neuropathological conditions, making DR of particular interest for these disorders. Notable successes of DR in NDDs include e.g., repurposing of fenfluramine in Dravet syndrome (5) or bumetanide (6) and pregnenolone (7) for autism spectrum disorders. These studies validate DR as a valid treatment approach for multiple neuropathological conditions. > We here discuss the current state of art of DR efforts in RTT, CDD and FOXG1-syndrome, with particular emphasis on the shared molecular pathways and the identification of common drug targets across the three conditions. For a more detailed overview on the molecular and circuit mechanisms underlying each syndrome, please refer to (8)(9)(10) for RTT, (11,12) for CDD and (2, 13) for FOXG1-syndrome (2,13).
  • Snippet 2 (score: 0.449) > Rigorous preclinical and clinical studies are also crucial for better understanding the complex pathophysiology of these syndromes. To date, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying these complex disorders are still not fully understood; hindering the identification and validation of potential drug targets. This specifically applies to CDD and FOXG1-syndrome: both conditions were identified as distinct clinical entities only recently and it is understandable that research efforts initially focused primarily on "classical" RTT. This discrepancy is reflected also in the very different numbers of repurposing studies highlighted in Figure 1. Continued efforts in pre-clinical (identification of valuable cell and animal models etc.) and clinical research (better understanding of the natural history, clinical manifestations, disease progression, biomarkers etc.) will be essential for advancing our understanding and improving outcomes for individuals affected by these syndromes. In particular, better characterizing the shared symptoms and pathways across these entities, will provide valuable insights into the underlying biology and potentially uncover new common mechanisms and targeted therapies. If the disorders demonstrate convergence in their underlying molecular pathways, this provides an opportunity for designing joint DR 10.3389/fmed.2024.1425038 strategies across RTT and RTT-like disorders. This could reduce the time needed for the development of DR and increase the number of patients benefiting from the treatments, resulting in more attractive business models. > Despite promising DR results in preclinical or early-phase clinical trials for RTT and related disorders in our opinion DR is still underrated and underutilized in this kind of disorders. DR holds immense potential for addressing the unmet medical needs and therapeutic challenges posed by such complex NDDs, and recent advancements screening and computational techniques, offer the unique opportunity to predict drug-disease interactions and prioritize candidate compounds for further investigation. By leveraging existing drugs and repurposing them for new indications, this approach offers a pragmatic and efficient strategy to accelerate the development of treatments for individuals affected by these debilitating conditions.

[2] Conditional Deletion of Foxg1 Delayed Myelination during Early Postnatal Brain Development

  • Authors: Guangliang Cao, Congli Sun, Hualin Shen, D-W Qu, Chuanlu Shen et al.
  • Year: 2023
  • Venue: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b05ba28c7ef5e5c4acf5dff2063fd35fbaa06535
  • DOI: 10.3390/ijms241813921
  • PMID: 37762220
  • PMCID: 10530892
  • Citations: 2
  • Summary: It is found that Foxg1 deficiency resulted in a transient delay in myelination, evidenced by decreased myelin formation within the first two weeks after birth, but ultimately recovered to the control levels by P30.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.480) > Fully mapping its diverse molecular interactions and cellular outputs remains an important and challenging goal for future studies. To gain more insights into the role of Foxg1 in OL development and myelination, future studies can employ more sophisticated and comprehensive techniques to explore novel targets. For example, transcriptomic and epigenetic analyses can be performed to identify the global gene expression and chromatin changes induced using Foxg1 deletion in OL lineage cells. Moreover, specific transgenic tools can be used to manipulate Foxg1 expression in a temporally and cell-type-specific manner. > It should be noted that there are still certain limitations in our study to be considered. While providing initial evidence for the role of Foxg1 in oligodendrocyte development and myelination, our study only examined the effects of Foxg1 deficiency in mice up to P30. Further long-term studies beyond this early developmental window will be important for fully understanding the consequences of Foxg1 deficiency on myelin integrity and disease progression. In addition, FOXG1 syndrome is a clinically heterogeneous disorder, and the diverse symptoms may arise not only from Foxg1 and OLs dysfunction but also from additional genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors influencing neurodevelopment, suggesting that the underlying etiology of FOXG1 syndrome is likely multifactorial. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the complex pathophysiology underlying this disorder. > In conclusion, our study provides new insights into the role of Foxg1 in myelin development and uncovers potential pathological mechanisms of FOXG1 syndrome, which have important implications for the development of therapeutic strategies not only for FOXG1 syndrome but also for other neurodevelopmental disorders associated with abnormal myelination.

[3] FOXG1 Dose in Brain Development

  • Authors: N. Hettige, C. Ernst
  • Year: 2019
  • Venue: Frontiers in Pediatrics
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd8fcfa4d63cbd7853030263d0d7c81237ecc83a
  • DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00482
  • PMID: 31824897
  • PMCID: 6882862
  • Citations: 59
  • Influential citations: 3
  • Summary: It is argued against a linear, symmetrical relationship between FoxG1 dosage states, although FOXG1 levels at the right time and place need to be carefully regulated, although neurodevelopmental disease states caused by mutations in FOXG 1 may therefore be regulated through different mechanisms.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.427) > Clinical data on several FOXG1 deletion syndrome patients have been reviewed and discussed in this review; however, understanding why a loss or mutation in one copy of FOXG1 leads to microcephaly and severe intellectual disability in humans is unknown. Human-derived iPSCs now make it feasible to generate isogenic, patient-derived neurons to investigate neurodevelopment and to perform functional genetic studies (102). Patriarchi et al. generated iPSC-derived neurons from FOXG1 +/− patients and suggested that there is an imbalance in excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) synaptic protein expression in patient neurons compared to controls (103). However, these data do not explore the dynamics of FOXG1 dose as neurons develop. It seems reasonable to suspect that the molecular mechanism of disease will arise early on as cells differentiate and any overt cellular phenotype at a mature cell stage is a passenger effect to an earlier problem in cell differentiation. It is these early molecular mechanisms that need to be assessed to understand how FOXG1 dose leads to a reproducible, robust cellular phenotype. To this end, a recent study was able to generate human stem cells where FOXG1 dose could be fine-tuned (104). Studies such as these will become important in titrating specific doses at specific times for in vitro neurodevelopment.

[4] The patient-specific mouse model with Foxg1 frameshift mutation uncovers the pathophysiology of FOXG1 syndrome

  • Authors: J. Park, J. Moon, Holly O’Shea, Dongjun Shin, S. Hwang et al.
  • Year: 2023
  • Venue: Research Square
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7cbc15f07a50a30a5b3701eb7468e2b6cf1f8777
  • DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2953760/v1
  • PMID: 37398410
  • PMCID: 10312924
  • Citations: 1
  • Summary: It is found that Q84Pfs-Het mice faithfully recapitulate human FS phenotypes at the cellular, brain structural, and behavioral levels and elucidated the essential pathophysiology mechanisms of FS.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.413) > Importantly, these studies highlight that both copies of the Foxg1 gene are required for building the functional cortex. > In mice, neuronal migration and layer formation are largely completed by birth, and glial cells begin to emerge 3 . Oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) in the cortex proliferate and differentiate into myelinating oligodendrocytes (OLs) after birth, and the myelination continues to adulthood 17 . > In humans, the pathogenic variants in the FOXG1 gene lead to the debilitating neurodevelopmental disorder collectively termed FOXG1 syndrome (FS) 18,19,19−23 . Most FS is caused by de novo mutations in a single allele of the FOXG1 gene. FS patients exhibit structural brain abnormalities, such as microcephaly and corpus callosum agenesis, and a delay in oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination. FS is also characterized by severe intellectual disability, hyperkinetic-dyskinetic movement disorder, irritability, and epilepsy. Many FS patients have autistic features, such as repetitive movements, poor social interaction skills, and a near absence of verbal speech and language development. Hence, FS belongs to the autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Currently, the molecular and cellular mechanisms leading to the pathology of FS remain elusive. > The crucial involvement of FOXG1 in forebrain development and human pathogenesis raises several questions. First, what are the cellular changes triggering FS symptoms? Second, what are the molecular changes leading to FS pathology? Third, what is the role of FOXG1 in myelination, and how does the disturbed myelination in FS contribute to FS clinical manifestation? Notably, a wide spectrum of symptoms of FS patients is associated with the type and location of the causative FOXG1 variants 19,24 . This highlights the need for patient-speci c FS mouse models, which carry FS-causing genetic variants, to understand FS pathophysiology and develop therapeutic interventions for FS patients. The existing Foxg1-null mouse lines 2,9,25,26 are inadequate as they have the complete deletion of the Foxg1 gene.
  • Snippet 2 (score: 0.384) > A majority of FS patients possess mutations within the FOXG1 gene coding region, which are likely to produce faulty Foxg1 protein products that impact disease mechanisms and progression. Therefore, the currently available Foxg1-null mouse lines are inadequate to investigate FS pathophysiology because they delete the entire Foxg1 coding region 2,9,25,35,36 . Here, we established Q84Pfs-Het mice as the rst patient-speci c FS mouse model that accurately replicates human genetic conditions of FS. Remarkably, the heterozygous mice carrying only a single allele of Q84Pfs variant, without creating the homozygous conditions, recapitulated a wide range of human FS symptoms, such as brain structural de cits and ASDlike behaviors. Using this new FS mouse model, we uncovered molecular and cellular changes, such as oligodendrocyte lineage de ciency and dysregulation of synaptic genes, leading to the key hallmarks of FS, such as delayed myelination, movement de cits, and ASD-like behaviors. > A tight genetic and phenotypic resemblance between Q84Pfs-Het mice and human FS patients provides clear advantages in understanding the pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental disorders and developing therapeutics, compared to many ASD mouse models, in which the ASD genes are eliminated, unlike the corresponding human conditions in which ASD genes are often present as heterozygous conditions or are epigenetically silenced 37 . First, it allowed us to identify dysregulated genes in FS brains, which are likely to lead to cellular and structural de cits and further behavioral outcomes. Second, our studies uncovered new mouse phenotypes highly correlated with human FS symptoms, such as de ciency in oligodendrocyte development and myelination, increased repetitive behavior and anxiety levels, and extensive behavior arrest. Thus, Q84Pfs-Het mice will serve as an ideal mouse model to identify the pathogenic mechanism for these mouse phenotypes and human symptoms.

[5] New therapeutic targets in rare genetic skeletal diseases

  • Authors: M. Briggs, Peter A. Bell, M. Wright, K. A. Pirog
  • Year: 2015
  • Venue: Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1363107f71ae6d2d60abca471cddf3da5d13644b
  • DOI: 10.1517/21678707.2015.1083853
  • PMID: 26635999
  • PMCID: 4643203
  • Citations: 38
  • Influential citations: 1
  • Summary: An overview of disease mechanisms that are shared amongst groups of different GSDs and potential therapeutic approaches that are under investigation are described to generate critical mass for the identification and validation of novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.400) > proteins of the cartilage ECM such as type II collagen [50]. However, emerging knowledge suggests that the primary genetic defect may be less important than the cells' response to the expression of the mutant gene product [107]. Moreover, the largely overlooked response of a cell (i.e. chondrocyte) to the abnormal extracellular environment is also important for disease progression as illustrated by several GSDs discussed in this review. > It is important that 'omics'-based approaches and technologies are systematically applied to the study of rare GSDs so that definitive reference profiles and disease signatures are generated for each phenotype. These can then be used in a Systems Biology approach to identify both common and dissimilar pathological signatures and disease mechanisms. This approach is entirely dependent upon relevant in vitro and in vivo models (and also novel 'disease-mechanism phenocopies' [107]) for testing new diagnostic and prognostic tools and for determining the molecular mechanisms that underpin the pathophysiology so that effective therapeutic treatments can be developed and validated. This approach will eventually lead to personalized treatments and care strategies centred on shared disease mechanisms with the use of relevant biomarkers to monitor the efficacy of treatment and disease progression. > It is vital that all relevant stakeholders are involved from the outset in defining the appropriate outcomes of any potential therapeutic regime. The perceptions of a successful therapy can differ widely between the clinical academic community and the relevant patient-support groups and it is vital that there is engagement on all these issues. > In summary, the identification of causative genes and mutations for GSDs over the last 20 years, coupled with the generation and in-depth analysis of a plethora of relevant cell and mouse models, has derived new knowledge on disease mechanisms and suggested potential therapeutic targets. The fast-evolving hypothesis that clinically disparate diseases can share common disease mechanisms is a powerful concept that will generate critical mass for the identification and validation of novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers.

[6] Modeling psychiatric disorders: from genomic findings to cellular phenotypes

  • Authors: Anna Falk, Vivi M. Heine, A. Harwood, Patrick F. Sullivan, M. Peitz et al.
  • Year: 2016
  • Venue: Molecular Psychiatry
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/235b41240d78140de7ab06a3ad8a7d0b1bdff1a5
  • DOI: 10.1038/mp.2016.89
  • PMID: 27240529
  • PMCID: 4995546
  • Citations: 77
  • Influential citations: 2
  • Summary: The challenges for modeling of psychiatric disorders, potential solutions and how iPSC technology can be used to develop an analytical framework for the evaluation and therapeutic manipulation of fundamental disease processes are critically reviewed.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.395) > The key challenge for iPSC-based disease modeling is to identify one or more relevant cellular phenotypes that accurately represent the disease pathophysiology. Increasing numbers of reports have demonstrated that for many diseases specific pathophysiology can be captured in human iPSC-based disease models. These range from cardiovascular disease, 44,45 cancer, 46,47 ocular disease, 48,49 diabetes mellitus 50,51 and neurological disorders of the brain. 52,53 Can the same approach be applied to complex psychiatric disorders? > The problem is that almost all psychiatric disorders are characterized by clinical signs and symptoms, but lack independent verification from objective biomarkers. Thus, how might these clinical phenotypes manifest themselves in terms of cell behavior? The identity of robust cellular 'readouts', which typify any psychiatric disorder, is a crucial unsolved problem and an area of intense study 54 (Table 2). When satisfactorily answered, this will herald a new degree of biological objectivity and quantification for the study of psychiatric disorders. > The aim is to find a single or small number of cell phenotypes or parameters that strongly associate with psychiatric disorders, and establish a cellular profile characteristic of cells derived from the general patient population. Although a consensus set of cellular phenotypes for psychiatric disorder is yet to be established, we can define some of their desired characteristics. First, cellular phenotypes have to relate to the biological pathways identified by genetics. Second, although there are many risk genes in disparate biological pathways, at some level, phenotypes should converge onto a much smaller grouping. Third, phenotypes need to be quantifiable. Finally, to be useful for drug development cellular phenotypes should be reversed by pharmacological treatment, although not necessarily by drugs in current use. > Although human iPSC-based approaches underrepresent the complexity of the human central nervous system, cellular phenotypes are likely to lie more proximal to molecular disease mechanisms than phenotypes seen at the level of a tissue or organism, 55 and thus may bypass compensatory homeostatic (2) Gene expression profiles of SCZ human iPSC neurons identified altered expression of many components of the cyclic AMP and WNT signaling pathways. > (3

[7] Common immunopathogenesis of central nervous system diseases: the protein-homeostasis-system hypothesis

  • Authors: Kyung-Yil Lee
  • Year: 2022
  • Venue: Cell & Bioscience
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2984270ae67451b93007040848d9694d19714c9f
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00920-5
  • PMID: 36384812
  • PMCID: 9668226
  • Citations: 9
  • Influential citations: 1
  • Summary: This article proposes a common immunopathogenesis of CNS diseases, including prion diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and genetic diseases, through the PHS hypothesis, which proposes that the immune systems in the host control those substances according to the size and biochemical properties of the substances.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.394) > There are hundreds of genetic diseases of the CNS. The defective proteins in genetic disorders include structural proteins for neurotransmitter receptors and other receptors or ion channels on CNS cells, and proteins involved in enzymatic process, metabolism (transport), or signal transduction pathways in various communication systems [98]. Because a discussion of each genetic disease is beyond the scope of this review, only crucial points about the pathogenesis of genetic diseases are discussed. Singlegene defect diseases of the CNS can be caused by a defective product from a gene, i.e., a protein deficiency or a malfunctioning protein. In general, autosomal dominant genetic diseases are caused by structural protein defects, and autosomal recessive diseases are caused by defects in enzymatic proteins. However, certain genetic diseases that involve an enzymatic or multifunctional protein defect can induce structural cell injury during the natural course of the illness. > Patients with genetic diseases, including HD, familial JCD, GSS, and the genetic forms of AD and PD, show different clinical manifestations from other affected people in their family, including the time of onset of neurological symptoms, speed of progression of the disease, and prognosis, suggesting that phenotypes can vary even when the genotypes are identical. Likewise, similar phenotypes of CNS symptoms can be found in different genetic diseases. In genetic animal models, the phenotypes of single gene knockout can vary by strain in mice, and the clinical manifestations of a gene defect can differ between mice and humans, and mice null for some genes have also no observable phenotypic abnormalities compared with controls [99]. These findings suggest that default of a protein might be at least partly controlled by individual's control systems and that there might exist a similar immune/repair system against cell injury in genetic diseases. > The pathophysiology of most genetic diseases in the CNS is complex because any affected gene is associated with numerous proteins and their corresponding activations of genes and epigenetic changes that occur during disease processes. Thus, the use of a genetic marker for diagnosing or predicting a prognosis remains impractical in clinical settings [100].

[8] Conceptualizing Epigenetics and the Environmental Landscape of Autism Spectrum Disorders

  • Authors: G. Torres, Mervat Mourad, Saba Iqbal, Emmanuel Moses-Fynn, Ashani Pandita et al.
  • Year: 2023
  • Venue: Genes
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf76f0682a8a1986ce889cee1fef818480abc83b
  • DOI: 10.3390/genes14091734
  • PMID: 37761876
  • PMCID: 10531442
  • Citations: 11
  • Summary: The present work reviews recent evolutionary, molecular, and epigenetic mechanisms potentially linked to the etiology of autism, and presents a clinical vignette to describe clusters of maladaptive behaviors frequently diagnosed in autistic patients.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.382) > Currently, there are hundreds of gene variants associated with the onset of ASD. Thus, the clinical presentation of the disease is highly variable, as one or more behavioral symptoms may be related to other comorbid conditions (e.g., anxiety disorder, seizure disorder) besides autism. In addition, antagonistic pleiotropy and dosage-sensitive genes further fragment the phenotypic characteristics of ASD. Regardless, here, we present a prototypical autism clinical vignette with five behavioral specifiers: cognitive disability; deficits in social-emotional reciprocity; repetitive or stereotyped motor behavior; improper coordinated language communication; and gastrointestinal distress. Underneath this clinical vignette, we microdissected and correlated a particular phenotype of the disease to functionally and anatomically related regions of the brain and bilateral body plan. The structural organization imposed here will not only identify a wide network of cells, but also specific clusters of genes targeting a particular symptom within behaviorally relevant regions. It is expected that such structural organization will help lay a solid foundation in psychiatry and point to more focused approaches to a deeper understanding of ASD and its individualized treatment (Table 2). Autism Spectrum Disorders can be managed with appropriate pharmacotherapy. Selective dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) based drugs are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment [43,44]. Additional neurotransmitter systems (e.g., norepinephrine (NE) and histamine) are also drug targets. It is not known whether the listed drugs regulate epigenetic mechanisms to counteract autistic symptoms. What is broadly known is that atypical, typical and psychoactive drugs act on DA and 5HT signaling pathways within regions of the human brain (e.g., cortex and basal ganglia) that are behaviorally relevant to the pathophysiology of ASD. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Fragile X Syndrome are debilitating neuropsychiatric conditions commonly diagnosed in pediatric populations. Fragile X Syndrome is a monogenic inherited disease leading to cognitive disability and ASD.

[9] Personalized Medicine: The Future of Health Care

  • Authors: A. Meiliana, Nurrani Mustika Dewi, A. Wijaya
  • Year: 2016
  • Venue: The Indonesian Biomedical Journal
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02edaa39ecdab3dd64c077e71b14398b94beb742
  • DOI: 10.18585/inabj.v8i3.271
  • Citations: 8
  • Summary: Personalized medicine seeks to use advances in knowledge about genetic factors and biological mechanisms of disease coupled with unique considerations of an individual’s patient care needs to make health care more safe and effective.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.382) > (98,170,171) The genetic cardiomyopathies present a window to cardiac pathophysiology when discrete cellular pathways are disrupted. Over the past decades, the role of numerous proteins in triggering cardiomyopathy and hence HF has finally become clear. Despite the genetic complexity, direct application of genetic testing is now a mainstay in managing affected families, and scientifically and clinically useful themes are emerging that should lead to improved treatment.( 95) > Investigations of rare monogenic disorders of heart rhythm has elucidated the fundamental molecular and genetic mechanisms of sickle cell disease. After identification of more than 25 causal genes, there remain many subjects with inherited arrhythmia susceptibility but do not have mutations, this suggests that there is still other genes left unidentified. Newer strategies such as exome and WGS may be valuable to uncover additional molecular etiologies. Efforts to understand mechanisms responsible for incomplete penetrance, including identification of modifier genes, will also contribute to deciphering the complex relationships between genotype and phenotype. (97) In diabetes, personalized medicine refers to utilize the patients specific characters for most effective diagnostic or treatment strategies. These include individual behavioral and phenotypic features, standard clinical laboratory findings, and gene sequences and other molecular markers.( 172) Diabetes mellitus has long been recognized to be a complex, heterogeneous disorder, especially in type 2 diabetes patients with substantial variability in genetic risk factors, underlying pathogenic mechanisms, and clinical features. Therefore it represents a human disease that gains a substantial benefit from personalized approaches to treatment. Nevertheless, patients with type 2 diabetes often are treated similarly, with little consideration of individual characteristics that might affect clinical outcome and therapeutic response.(173) Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes are thought to be complex diseases, which means they need the interplay of numerous susceptibility and protective genes, acting in concert with negative and positive environmental factors to be developed. (174) Type 2 diabetes typically is characterized by a combination of abnormalities in both insulin secretion and responsiveness, plus a more gradual and less extensive loss of β-cell secretory capacity than occurs in type 1 diabetes.

[10] Recent Evidences of Epigenetic Alterations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review

  • Authors: R. Ragusa, P. Bufano, A. Tognetti, M. Laurino, Chiara Caselli
  • Year: 2025
  • Venue: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2660cdbbe1f205c631fe890e5c6a3c8d9b81ce5f
  • DOI: 10.3390/ijms26062571
  • PMID: 40141213
  • PMCID: 11942187
  • Citations: 6
  • Summary: A systematic review of the latest knowledge on epigenetic modifications that characterize COPD, summarizing epigenetic factors that could serve as potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of COPD patients.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.374) > The papers included were clustered according to epigenetic mechanisms involved in COPD (molecular and cellular processes, as biomarker or therapeutic target). Tables 4-9 describe the extracted information, including the following: Study = name of first author et al., year; Country (Region) = where the study took place; Number of participants = sample size; Type of sample = biological sample employed; Gene affected = gene or group of genes whose expression can be "regulated" by epigenetic mechanisms; Epigenetic alteration = type of epigenetic alteration observed in the presence of disease; Activity in COPD = involvement of epigenetic elements in different molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with COPD; and Role of epigenetic mechanisms = epigenetic modifications that can be used to explain the pathophysiology of COPD or as biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

[11] Computational drug discovery approaches identify mebendazole as a candidate treatment for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

  • Authors: P. Brownjohn, A. Zoufir, Daniel J O’Donovan, Saatviga Sudhahar, A. Syme et al.
  • Year: 2024
  • Venue: Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a595e78572ca02b8cb2897bfc4a989a2b021b279
  • DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1397864
  • PMID: 38846086
  • PMCID: 11154008
  • Citations: 3
  • Summary: It is determined that the anthelmintic mebendazole was a potent anti-cystic agent in human cellular and in vivo models of ADPKD, and is likely acting through the inhibition of microtubule polymerisation and protein kinase activity.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.373) > Targets and molecules were ultimately filtered for validation based on biological and chemical insights, and the potential for clinical translation.Earlier this year, Wilk et al., 2023 applied a similar transcriptomic approach to us, in that case making use of publicly available transcriptomic datasets to create Pkd2-specific ADPKD disease signatures, from which signature reversion was sought from the Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCs) drug signature database in order to identify drug repurposing candidates.While one group has previously made use of a knowledge graph-based approach to prioritise preclinically active compounds with the highest chance of clinical translation (Malas et al., 2019), to our knowledge, the current study provides the first combined application of transcriptomic and machine-learning approaches to identify and prioritise putative treatments for ADPKD, and further deconvolute potential mechanisms of action for experimental validation. > In summary we report, using computational, in vitro and in vivo approaches, that the anthelmintic drug mebendazole ameliorates disease-relevant phenotypes in cellular and animal models of ADPKD.We further show that this effect is likely primarily due to the inhibitory effect of mebendazole on the polymerisation of microtubules, which underlie cellular processes important in ADPKD, including cell proliferation, transport, and cilia signalling, and extends previous work linking the importance of the microtubule network to ADPKD pathophysiology.We also describe the inhibitory profile of mebendazole on known and novel protein kinase targets, some of which have previously been implicated in ADPKD, suggesting mebendazole may be acting via polypharmacology to impact disease mechanisms.We acknowledge that further experimental efforts will be required to confirm the actions of mebendazole on these putative targets in relevant disease model systems.It would be particularly informative to investigate these mechanisms in dedicated in vivo studies, where the effects of mebendazole on a wider range of ADPKD-relevant cell types and phenotypes could be evaluated.

[12] Editorial: Impact of system biology and molecular medicine on the management of complex immune mediated respiratory diseases, volume II

  • Authors: B. Cárdaba, G. Pelaia
  • Year: 2023
  • Venue: Frontiers in Medicine
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89edb8e4f39ba41177cc4caa98150836f54e16f0
  • DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1187941
  • PMID: 37351067
  • PMCID: 10282990
  • Summary: The impact of system biology and molecular medicine on the management of complex immune mediated respiratory diseases, volume II and the need for further research into this area is discussed.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.372) > Complex Immune-Mediated Respiratory Diseases are highly complex and heterogeneous inflammatory disorders, sharing a common organ-disease target which is the lung, but including a broad clinical spectrum. The most frequent obstructive respiratory diseases include bronchial asthma and, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These disorders are characterized by airflow limitation, cough, dyspnea, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and mucus production that could be caused by numerous environmental agents, as well as, genetic, pharmacologic, physiologic, biological, or immunologic mechanisms, which give rise to distinct phenotypes, with underlying molecular mechanisms or endotypes that need to be understood. This great heterogeneity translate to a lack of good therapeutic options for an important percentage of patients that do not respond to standard treatments, who could receive relevant benefits by a precision or personalized strategy, which requires new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Our purpose in the second volume of this Research Topic was to collect the latest advances in the molecular and clinical characterization of these complex diseases, in order to better understand the underlying mechanisms and improve the overall management. > In this volume, five novelty works have been published: 4 original articles, 2 of them related to severe asthma, and the other 2 regarding COPD. The fifth is a mini review that summarizes the latest new advances about the T cell-mediated lung inflammation in COVID-19 infection. > In regard to bronchial asthma studies, the two published articles pursue a better understanding of underlying mechanisms of severe uncontrolled asthma, thus searching for cellular and molecular pathways involved in the pathobiology of asthmatic endotypes that do not respond to standard asthma treatments and remain uncontrolled, thereby being responsible for exacerbations and hospitalizations every year. > Asthma is a common, chronic respiratory disease, defined as "a heterogeneous disease, usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation" by the Global Initiative of Asthma (1). Despite its clinical heterogeneity, allergic mechanisms have been implicated in 50-80% of asthmatic patients and in ∼50% of severe asthma cases (2,3). Such considerations explain why there are several new biological treatments mainly directed against this subtype of inflammation (type 2 inflammation).

[13] Therapies for Mitochondrial Disease: Past, Present, and Future

  • Authors: Megan Ball, Nicole J. Van Bergen, A. Compton, David R. Thorburn, S. Rahman et al.
  • Year: 2025
  • Venue: Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/196ee50a950f29bc4134cfb8fe6bdfa9a3a1468b
  • DOI: 10.1002/jimd.70065
  • PMID: 40714961
  • PMCID: 12301291
  • Citations: 4
  • Summary: The latest developments in the pursuit to identify effective treatments for mitochondrial disease are examined and the barriers impeding their success in translation to clinical practice are discussed.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.371) > Mitochondrial disease is a diverse group of clinically and genetically complex disorders caused by pathogenic variants in nuclear or mitochondrial DNA‐encoded genes that disrupt mitochondrial energy production or other important mitochondrial pathways. Mitochondrial disease can present with a wide spectrum of clinical features and can often be difficult to recognize. These conditions can be devastating; however, for the majority, there is no targeted treatment. In the last 60 years, mitochondrial medicine has experienced significant evolution, moving from the pre‐molecular era to the Age of Genomics in which considerable gene discovery and advancement in our understanding of the pathophysiology of mitochondrial disease have been made. In the last decade, in response to the urgent need for effective treatments, a wide range of emerging therapies have been developed, driven by innovative approaches addressing both the genetic and cellular mechanisms underpinning the diseases. Emerging therapies include dietary intervention, small molecule therapies aimed to restore mitochondrial function, stem cell or liver transplantation, and gene or RNA‐based therapies. However, despite these advances, translation to clinical practice is complicated by the sheer genetic and clinical complexity of mitochondrial disease, difficulty in efficient and precise delivery of therapies to affected tissues, rarity of individual genetic conditions, lack of reliable biomarkers and clinically relevant outcome measures, and the dearth of natural history data. This review examines the latest developments in the pursuit to identify effective treatments for mitochondrial disease and discusses the barriers impeding their success in translation to clinical practice. While treatment for mitochondrial disease may be on the horizon, many challenges must be addressed before it can become a reality.

[14] Changes in Serum Proteomic Profiles at Different Stages of Pregnancy Toxemia in Goats

  • Authors: M. Uzti̇mür, C. N. Ünal, Gurler Akpinar
  • Year: 2025
  • Venue: Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b9c488b5dbd65d7b26fd2ad9aed70e8c4b59942
  • DOI: 10.1111/jvim.70139
  • PMID: 40492724
  • PMCID: 12150350
  • Summary: Understanding the serum proteome profiles of goats with pregnancy toxemia might help identify the proteomes and pathways responsible for the development of this disease and improve diagnosis and treatment.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.370) > The pathophysiology and progression of this disease are not fully understood. > Traditional biomedical research has focused on the analysis of single genes, proteins, metabolites, or metabolic pathways in diseases. This molecular reductionist approach is based on the assumption that identifying genetic variations and molecular components will lead to new treatments for diseases [13][14][15][16]. However, many diseases are complex and multifactorial, and in order to determine the phenotype of such diseases, it is necessary to understand the changes that occur in more than one gene, pathway, protein, or metabolite at the cellular, tissue, and organismal levels [17][18][19]. Therefore, in recent years, proteomics, as one field of multi-omics technologies, has helped in evaluating the complex pathogenetic mechanisms of different diseases from a broad perspective and has made substantial contributions [20,21]. In veterinary medicine, proteomic analysis of metabolic diseases such as ketosis [16], hypocalcemia [22], and fatty liver [23] in dairy cows has contributed valuable insights for the definition of new pathophysiological pathways and new diagnosis and treatment protocols for these diseases. The proteomic approach can contribute importantly to a broad and detailed understanding of the changes that occur at the organismal level associated with the increase in BHBA concentration in goats with pregnancy toxemia. Our aim was to evaluate the serum protein profiles of goats with SPT or CPT using proteomic techniques to determine the proteomic profiles of these animals and to identify the relevant pathophysiological mechanisms.

[15] Immune Dysregulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Do We Know about It?

  • Authors: M. Robinson-Agramonte, Elena Noris García, Jarasca Fraga Guerra, Yamilé Vega Hurtado, Nicola Antonucci et al.
  • Year: 2022
  • Venue: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d5e761dc4d912894a808ce3353286fc759f2ee5
  • DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063033
  • PMID: 35328471
  • PMCID: 8955336
  • Citations: 133
  • Influential citations: 2
  • Summary: Current insights into immune dysfunction in ASD are summarized, with particular reference to the impact of immunological factors related to the maternal influence of autism development; comorbidities influencing autism disease course and severity; and others factors with particular relevance, including obesity.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.369) > Neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders display a biologically defined expression related to brain dysfunctions and age-related disease onset. The former, considered as a disturbed behavior and emotional state derived from the functional brain impairment, and the latter, viewed as an organic brain disease where the symptoms follow the damage of specific brain regions. Studies from different groups show biological evidence for the presence of common immune-mediated mechanisms overlapping both disease processes, although understandably with some distinctive characteristics. > Clinical and experimental evidence have argued similar mechanisms of innate immunity pathway signaling overlapping immune-pathological events in both neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, characterized by the common influence of resident glial cells mediating inflammation via soluble molecules (mainly cytokines, chemokines, and complement proteins), which promote the recruitment of local immune cells and others coming from the peripheral compartment. To show this evidence, we refer to two pathologies occurring in the both extremes of the life: ASD, the main object of this review, and Parkinson disease (PD), following the main aspects of innate immunity relevant to both disorders and where the glial cells are the main cellular element. > In general, both disorders, ASD and PD, are related to brain dysfunctions, and in their particular context, genetic causes and risk factors play a central role in disease pathophysiology, severity, and disease progression besides the overlapping immunopathological mechanisms and molecular pathways. More than 100 candidate genes identified in ASD may converge as causal factors related to neuronal development, plasticity, synaptic structure, and performance [230,231]. Several genes and genomic regions, including alpha-synuclein (SNCA), parkinRBRE3 ubiquitin protein ligase (PARK2), chromosome 22q11deletion/DiGeorge region, and fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) repeats, may be relevant to the development of both ASD and PD, with converging features related to synaptic function and neurogenesis. Both PD and ASD also show alterations and impairments at the synaptic level, representing early main disease phenotypes converging upon mechanisms active in the two diseases [232].

[16] Human Dermal Fibroblast: A Promising Cellular Model to Study Biological Mechanisms of Major Depression and Antidepressant Drug Response

  • Authors: P. Mesdom, R. Colle, É. Lebigot, S. Trabado, Eric Deflesselle et al.
  • Year: 2020
  • Venue: Current Neuropharmacology
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79368e365458486de96794333613c12a6063bf54
  • DOI: 10.2174/1570159X17666191021141057
  • PMID: 31631822
  • PMCID: 7327943
  • Citations: 14
  • Summary: This review highlights the great and still underused potential of HDF, which stands out as a very promising tool in the understanding of MDD and AD mechanisms of action.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.369) > Background: Human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) can be used as a cellular model relatively easily and without genetic engineering. Therefore, HDF represent an interesting tool to study several human diseases including psychiatric disorders. Despite major depressive disorder (MDD) being the second cause of disability in the world, the efficacy of antidepressant drug (AD) treatment is not sufficient and the underlying mechanisms of MDD and the mechanisms of action of AD are poorly understood. Objective The aim of this review is to highlight the potential of HDF in the study of cellular mechanisms involved in MDD pathophysiology and in the action of AD response. Methods The first part is a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines on the use of HDF in MDD research. The second part reports the mechanisms and molecules both present in HDF and relevant regarding MDD pathophysiology and AD mechanisms of action. Results HDFs from MDD patients have been investigated in a relatively small number of works and most of them focused on the adrenergic pathway and metabolism-related gene expression as compared to HDF from healthy controls. The second part listed an important number of papers demonstrating the presence of many molecular processes in HDF, involved in MDD and AD mechanisms of action. Conclusion The imbalance in the number of papers between the two parts highlights the great and still underused potential of HDF, which stands out as a very promising tool in our understanding of MDD and AD mechanisms of action

[17] Gastric Cancer: Molecular Pathology State

  • Authors: Filomena Altieri, P. Arcari, E. Rippa
  • Year: 2013
  • Venue: Unknown venue
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a085a501814bbf6e4a93494cce35bd87bd5803a7
  • DOI: 10.5772/53757
  • Citations: 3
  • Summary: Despite the progressive decrease observed in the past fifty years, gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth of the world rankings incidence of various types of cancer and is the second as a cause of cancer-related death.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.368) > In this review, we have summarized reports on genes, proteins and factors involved in gastric carcinogenesis based on currently available literature. Gastric carcinoma results from a complex interaction between bacterial, environmental, host-genetic and molecular mechanisms. It is evident that gastric cancer is the consequence of a multistep process involving different genetic and epigenetic changes in numerous genes. Host genetic background and environmental factors also play an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease. The majority of genetic alterations contributing to the malignant transformation were observed in growth regulatory genes, and in genes involved in cell cycle progression and arrest. In recent years, the analysis of molecular carcinogenesis gastric epithelial neoplasm has certainly provided information of great importance. It is understood that the molecular mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis of intestinal type are different from those prevailing in the development of diffuse one. The element of greater importance from a clinical point lies in the fact that the elucidation of these mechanisms is the prerequisite for exploring innovative therapeutic approaches. While the conventional forms of treatment seem to have reached the limit of effectiveness, it is possible that use of targeted therapies based on solid preclinical rational can translate into tangible clinical benefit. The reviewed signaling pathways are relevant contributors for gastric carcinogenesis and encompass a multitude of potential therapeutic targets. In addition to these signaling-related targets we included new data on GKN1 as being involved in gastric cancer susceptibility phenotype.

[18] Targeting Hepatic Stellate Cells for the Prevention and Treatment of Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Strategies and Clinical Translation

  • Authors: Hao Xiong, Jinsheng Guo
  • Year: 2025
  • Venue: Pharmaceuticals
  • URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76e92127053136900f7e3f10e2c9278251ced5d2
  • DOI: 10.3390/ph18040507
  • PMID: 40283943
  • PMCID: 12030350
  • Citations: 10
  • Summary: HSC-targeted approaches using specific surface markers and receptors may enable the selective delivery of drugs, oligonucleotides, and therapeutic peptides that exert optimized anti-fibrotic and anti-HCC effects.
  • Evidence snippets:
  • Snippet 1 (score: 0.368) > Significant progress has been made in elucidating the cellular and molecular mechanisms of liver fibrosis; however, only a few findings have been successfully translated into clinical applications. Firstly, the high cost of drug development and target validation necessitates prolonged timelines and substantial financial investment. Secondly, as regulatory requirements become more stringent, there is an increasing demand for drugs with well-defined clinical efficacy and safety profiles. Moreover, the efficacy observed in animal models often fails to fully translate to clinical settings due to differences in pharmacokinetics, extracellular matrix (ECM) cross-linking, and disease pathophysiology. Despite advancements in anti-fibrotic drug development, accurately identifying ideal noninvasive biomarkers for fibrotic activity and establishing consensus on optimal clinical endpoints remain significant challenges [113,114]. > Currently, addressing the underlying cause remains the only proven strategy to halt or reverse liver fibrosis progression, while the development of effective anti-fibrotic therapies continues to pose a major challenge in liver disease management. Over the past few decades, substantial progress has been made in elucidating the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis. Liver fibrosis is a complex pathological change involving multiple cells, factors, and pathways, and the study of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of its occurrence and development provides an important theoretical basis and therapeutic target for clinical drug development. It is anticipated that improved animal models and well-designed clinical trials will facilitate the successful translation of anti-fibrotic research into effective clinical treatments in the near future.

Notes

  • This provider combines search_papers_by_relevance with snippet_search.
  • No synthesis or second-stage model call is performed.