Ageing associated decline in intrinsic capacity (ICD-11 MG2A) is the age-related erosion of intrinsic capacity - the composite of all the physical and mental capacities an individual can draw on at any point in time. Intrinsic capacity is one of the two determinants (with the environment) of functional ability in the WHO healthy-ageing model, and is operationalised across five domains: locomotion, vitality, cognition, psychological capacity, and sensory capacity. Decline is graded rather than binary, is usually insidious and multi-domain, and typically precedes and predicts frailty, care dependence, and death. Mechanistically the entry treats the condition as the clinical convergence point of the molecular and cellular hallmarks of ageing: accumulating damage drives mitochondrial bioenergetic decline, senescent-cell accumulation, inflammaging, and loss of regenerative reserve, which together erode physiological reserve across organ systems and surface as domain-specific capacity loss. Unlike a single-organ disease, the entity is defined at the level of the whole organism, and its principal management is multidomain and person-centred rather than pharmacological. This entry deliberately models the construct as WHO and ICD-11 define it, and does not treat it as a synonym for frailty, sarcopenia, or disability, each of which is modelled separately.
Ask a research question about Ageing Associated Decline in Intrinsic Capacity. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
name: Ageing Associated Decline in Intrinsic Capacity
creation_date: '2026-08-31T00:00:00Z'
category: Complex
categories:
- Geriatric Syndrome
- Ageing-Related Functional Decline
parents:
- general symptoms, signs or clinical findings
- ageing-related functional decline
synonyms:
- ageing-associated decline in intrinsic capacity
- age-related decline in intrinsic capacity
- intrinsic capacity decline
- loss of intrinsic capacity
- IC decline
description: >-
Ageing associated decline in intrinsic capacity (ICD-11 MG2A) is the age-related
erosion of intrinsic capacity - the composite of all the physical and mental
capacities an individual can draw on at any point in time. Intrinsic capacity is
one of the two determinants (with the environment) of functional ability in the
WHO healthy-ageing model, and is operationalised across five domains: locomotion,
vitality, cognition, psychological capacity, and sensory capacity. Decline is
graded rather than binary, is usually insidious and multi-domain, and typically
precedes and predicts frailty, care dependence, and death. Mechanistically the
entry treats the condition as the clinical convergence point of the molecular and
cellular hallmarks of ageing: accumulating damage drives mitochondrial bioenergetic
decline, senescent-cell accumulation, inflammaging, and loss of regenerative
reserve, which together erode physiological reserve across organ systems and
surface as domain-specific capacity loss. Unlike a single-organ disease, the entity
is defined at the level of the whole organism, and its principal management is
multidomain and person-centred rather than pharmacological. This entry deliberately
models the construct as WHO and ICD-11 define it, and does not treat it as a
synonym for frailty, sarcopenia, or disability, each of which is modelled
separately.
notes: >-
Modelling decisions for this entry, recorded because several are unusual.
(1) There is no `disease_term`: MONDO carries no class for intrinsic capacity or
its decline (searched 2026-08-31 via OLS against MONDO), so the entry is anchored
on the ICD-11 Foundation entity icd11f:835503193 in `mappings.icd11f_mappings`
instead. That entity is the Foundation counterpart of MMS linearisation code MG2A,
sits under General symptoms, and has no children. Twenty-six other entries in
`kb/disorders/` likewise carry no MONDO anchor, so this is an accepted state, not
a defect; if MONDO later mints a class it should be added as the `disease_term`.
(2) The five ICOPE domains are modelled as `has_subtypes` rather than as bare
phenotype categories. They are not aetiological subtypes in the Mendelian sense;
they are the axes along which the construct is measured and along which impairment
is genuinely dissociable - a person can have isolated locomotor decline with intact
cognition, and cohort studies report domain-specific trajectories. Using
`has_subtypes` gives the phenotypes, prevalence, and progression records a foreign
key to hang domain-specific claims on, which a free-text category would not.
(3) The pathophysiology chain conforms to the hallmarks-of-ageing modules in
`kb/modules/` rather than restating them. The upstream biology is not specific to
this entity - what is specific is the convergence onto measured capacity domains,
so the entry's own content starts at "Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ
Systems" and works forward.
(4) The causal direction from hallmark biology to measured intrinsic capacity is
supported in humans by association, not by intervention: the strongest human link
is that plasma markers of inflammation and mitochondrial impairment separate
multi-impaired from high-stable IC trajectories. This is recorded as an open
knowledge gap rather than asserted, and the relevant edges are marked
`causal_link_type: INDIRECT`.
(5) References fetched but not cited. This entry's `references_cache/` additions are
larger than its citation list because the deep-research run resolved its own
citations into the same cache, so the cache reflects what the report cited, not what
a curator selected. Of the remainder, the following were read and deliberately set
aside: PMID:37543528 (a second prevalence meta-analysis reporting 76.1%, superseded
here by the larger and more recent PMID:39088112, whose estimate is anchored to a
stated cutoff); PMID:34179933, PMID:35830956 and PMID:36901237 (measurement and
screening reviews whose substance is already carried by PMID:35569785 in the
five-domain definition); PMID:36832984 and PMID:41227125 (scoping reviews of outcome
prediction, superseded by the PMID:38945130 meta-analysis); PMID:36612480 (ICOPE
adoption worldwide - implementation policy rather than mechanism or outcome);
PMID:36750172 (I-Lan 10-year mortality, consistent with and weaker than the cohorts
already cited); PMID:35775483 and PMID:40666427 (general hallmarks-of-ageing reviews,
where the entry cites the primary Lopez-Otin statements instead); PMID:38719530
(deprescribing, a real intervention for older adults but with no measured
intrinsic-capacity outcome); and PMID:28359749 (the MAPT primary cognitive result,
where the entry instead cites MAPT's registration record and the biomarker
sub-study that is actually about capacity).
(6) Programmatic context, for readers arriving from geroscience rather than
geriatrics: WHO's Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) programme is the
operational framework that turned intrinsic capacity from a construct into a
screening and care pathway, and is what most of the clinical literature cited here
measures. Separately, the US ARPA-H programme PROSPR (Proactive Solutions for
Prolonging Resilience) funds work that uses intrinsic capacity as an early,
actionable endpoint for healthspan interventions, on the argument that
conventional trials of ageing interventions are too slow because the diseases they
target take decades to appear. PROSPR is a funding programme rather than a
published finding, so it is named here and not curated as evidence.
mappings:
icd11f_mappings:
- term:
id: icd11f:835503193
label: Ageing associated decline in intrinsic capacity
mapping_predicate: skos:exactMatch
mapping_source: manual curation
mapping_justification: >-
The ICD-11 Foundation entity is the source of this entry's identity: the entry
was created to model the concept behind MMS linearisation code MG2A, and the
Foundation label is reproduced verbatim as the entry name. The entity resolves
under General symptoms within Symptoms, signs or clinical findings, not
elsewhere classified, and has no children, so the mapping is one-to-one.
definitions:
- name: WHO definition of intrinsic capacity
definition_type: OTHER
derivation_basis: ESTABLISHED_CRITERIA
description: >-
Intrinsic capacity is the composite of all the physical and mental capacities an
individual can draw on. With the environment and the interaction between the two,
it determines functional ability, which is what the WHO healthy-ageing model
treats as the object of care rather than the presence or absence of disease.
scope: >-
Defines the construct whose decline this entry models; it is not a diagnostic
threshold and does not by itself identify an affected individual.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26520231
reference_title: 'The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
The report is built around a redefinition of healthy ageing that centres on the notion of functional ability: the combination of the intrinsic capacity of the individual, relevant environmental characteristics, and the interactions between the individual and these characteristics.
explanation: >-
States the WHO model in which intrinsic capacity is one of the two determinants
of functional ability. Evidence source is OTHER because this is a policy
framework paper rather than a study.
- reference: PMID:31275941
reference_title: 'Frailty and Intrinsic Capacity: Two Distinct but Related Constructs.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
the World Health Organization introduced the concept of intrinsic capacity (IC), defined as the composite of all physical and mental capacities that an individual can draw upon during his/her life.
explanation: >-
Gives the definitional wording of the construct itself, separate from the
functional-ability model it sits inside.
- name: Five-domain operational model of intrinsic capacity
definition_type: OTHER
derivation_basis: ESTABLISHED_CRITERIA
description: >-
Intrinsic capacity is operationalised as five domains - locomotion, vitality,
cognition, psychological, and sensory - which is what makes the construct
measurable. Factor-analytic work in a population cohort recovers a general
intrinsic-capacity factor plus these five subfactors, so the domain structure is
an empirical finding and not only a conceptual convenience.
scope: >-
Applies to the whole entry; the `has_subtypes` records reproduce these five
domains and the phenotypes are grouped against them.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29408961
reference_title: Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
five domains (i.e., locomotion, vitality, cognition, psychological, sensory) are identified as pivotal for capturing the individual's intrinsic capacity
explanation: >-
The consensus paper that fixed the five-domain structure used throughout this
entry. Evidence source is OTHER because it is an expert review.
- reference: PMID:31678933
reference_title: The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
One general factor (intrinsic capacity) and five subfactors emerged: locomotor, cognitive; psychological; sensory; and 'vitality'.
explanation: >-
Recovers the five-domain structure empirically by factor analysis in 2560
participants of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, so the domains are
not merely stipulated.
- reference: PMID:35569785
reference_title: 'Defining and assessing intrinsic capacity in older people: A systematic review and a proposed scoring system.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
There is overall consensus on the definition of IC as well as on its different dimensions, that is: locomotion, vitality, sensory, cognition and psychological.
explanation: >-
Confirms across 33 studies that the five dimensions are agreed even where the
measurement instruments are not.
- name: WHO working definition of vitality capacity
definition_type: OTHER
derivation_basis: ESTABLISHED_CRITERIA
description: >-
Vitality capacity is the physiological substrate of intrinsic capacity: a state
arising from the interaction of energy and metabolism, neuromuscular function,
and immune and stress-response function. It is the domain closest to the biology
of ageing, which is why it is treated in this entry as gating the other four
rather than sitting beside them.
scope: >-
Defines the vitality subtype; the claim that vitality gates the other domains is
a mechanistic reading of this definition and is recorded as such in the
pathophysiology, not as an established finding.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36356628
reference_title: WHO working definition of vitality capacity for healthy longevity monitoring.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
vitality capacity is a physiological state (due to normal or accelerated biological ageing processes) resulting from the interaction between multiple physiological systems, reflected in (the level of) energy and metabolism, neuromuscular function, and immune and stress response functions of the body.
explanation: >-
The WHO expert-group working definition, quoted verbatim, which is what makes
vitality the domain where hallmark ageing biology enters the construct.
- name: WHO ICOPE Step 1 screening for decline in intrinsic capacity
definition_type: PHENOTYPE_ALGORITHM
derivation_basis: ESTABLISHED_CRITERIA
description: >-
The ICOPE Step 1 instrument is a short, equipment-free screen applied in primary
care to adults aged 60 and over, testing six practical sub-domains - locomotion
(chair rises), cognition (orientation and three-word recall), vitality (recent
weight and appetite loss), vision, hearing, and depressive symptoms. A positive
screen triggers Step 2 in-depth assessment rather than a diagnosis; the whole
point of the instrument is triage into a care pathway.
scope: >-
Community-dwelling and primary-care populations aged 60 years and older. Not a
diagnostic replacement for organ-specific assessment of any single domain.
validation_status:
status: VALIDATED_AGAINST_GOLD_STANDARD
rationale: >-
Validated against the Step 2 in-depth assessments (MMSE, Mini Nutritional
Assessment, Short Physical Performance Battery, PHQ-9, clinical vision
assessment) as the reference standard, and against incident dependence and
hospitalisation in cohort follow-up. The result is genuinely mixed rather than
clean: specificity exceeds 70% for every domain except vision, but sensitivity
falls to 42% for some domains, and a separate structural analysis found the
cognitive items behaving poorly and the composite adding nothing over the
individual domains. The instrument is therefore recorded as validated and
imperfect, not as a settled case definition.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38676323
reference_title: 'Predictive Capacity of the Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments: Results From the INSPIRE-T Cohort.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The ICOPE screening items provided very high sensitivity for identifying abnormality in vision (97.2%) and varied from 42.0% to 69.6% for the other domains.
explanation: >-
Quantifies the instrument's operating characteristics against the in-depth
assessment used as reference standard in 603 INSPIRE-T participants.
- reference: PMID:37960903
reference_title: 'The icope Intrinsic Capacity Screening Tool: Measurement Structure and Predictive Validity of Dependence and Hospitalization.'
supports: REFUTE
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The cognitive domain of the IST, and probably other of its items, may need a reformulation.
explanation: >-
Refutes the stronger reading that the instrument is validated as a whole: in
the Toledo Study of Healthy Ageing the cognitive items did not behave as the
model requires and the global composite added nothing over the individual
domains.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36098317
reference_title: 'Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Individuals aged ≥60 years were screened (step 1) by health-care providers or through self-assessments using digital tools (the ICOPE MONITOR app and the ICOPEBOT conversational robot).
explanation: >-
Describes how the Step 1 screen is actually applied at scale, in the 10 903-person
Occitania implementation that this definition is drawn from.
has_subtypes:
- name: Locomotor
display_name: Locomotor capacity decline
description: >-
Loss of the capacity to move: reduced muscle strength, slowed gait, and impaired
balance and chair-rise performance. This is the domain most strongly tied to a
named disease process, sarcopenia, and the domain that most consistently predicts
dependence in basic activities of daily living.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29408961
reference_title: Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
five domains (i.e., locomotion, vitality, cognition, psychological, sensory) are identified as pivotal for capturing the individual's intrinsic capacity
explanation: Establishes locomotion as one of the five constituent domains.
- name: Vitality
display_name: Vitality capacity decline
description: >-
Loss of the underlying physiological reserve expressed as energy and metabolism,
neuromuscular function, and immune and stress-response function. Clinically it
surfaces as unintentional weight loss, appetite loss, and fatigue. Vitality is
the domain in which the biology of ageing is most directly measured, and it is
treated in the WHO framework as underpinning rather than paralleling the others.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36356628
reference_title: WHO working definition of vitality capacity for healthy longevity monitoring.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Vitality capacity is considered the underlying physiological determinant of intrinsic capacity.
explanation: >-
States the special status of vitality among the five domains, which is why this
subtype is described as underpinning the others.
- name: Cognitive
display_name: Cognitive capacity decline
description: >-
Loss of memory, orientation, and executive function short of dementia. Screened
by orientation questions and three-word recall; impairment in this domain
interacts strongly with genetic susceptibility in predicting incident dementia.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38843484
reference_title: 'Intrinsic Capacity, Polygenic Risk Score, APOE Genotype, and Risk of Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on the UK Biobank.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Compared with participants with an IC score of 0, individuals with an IC score of 4+ had a markedly elevated risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, 95% CI 1.92-2.45).
explanation: >-
Establishes the clinical consequence that distinguishes this domain, in 366 406
UK Biobank participants.
- name: Psychological
display_name: Psychological capacity decline
description: >-
Loss of mood, motivation, and sociability, screened in ICOPE by depressive-symptom
questions. It is the domain most readily confounded with primary psychiatric
disease, and the one most strongly associated with pain.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41360071
reference_title: 'The association of pain with intrinsic capacity and the moderating role of inflammation in France: a cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRE-T project.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Pain at all intensities, mild (0·512, 0·163, p=0·0017), moderate (1·111, 0·191, p<0·0001), or intense (1·532, 0·263, p<0·0001), was significantly associated with lower scores in the psychological domain.
explanation: >-
Shows the psychological domain responding to a graded exposure across the whole
intensity range, which is not true of the other domains in the same cohort.
- name: Sensory
display_name: Sensory capacity decline
description: >-
Age-related loss of hearing and vision. Structurally the two are separate ageing
processes in separate organs, and measurement work has found they do not load onto
a single sensory factor, so the domain is a clinical grouping rather than a single
mechanism.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37960903
reference_title: 'The icope Intrinsic Capacity Screening Tool: Measurement Structure and Predictive Validity of Dependence and Hospitalization.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Vision and hearing items did not form a single sensory domain, so six domains were considered.
explanation: >-
Directly supports treating hearing and vision as separate measurement axes
inside one clinical domain.
prevalence:
- population: Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older, pooled across 15 studies
measure_type: POINT_PREVALENCE
prevalence_class: ABOVE_1_IN_1000
rate_per_100000: 67800.0
rate_low: 57000.0
rate_high: 78500.0
notes: >-
Random-effects pooled prevalence of any intrinsic-capacity decline, 33 070
participants. Converted from 67.8% (95% CI 57.0-78.5%). The figure is high
because "decline" here means any impaired domain on screening, not a severity
threshold, and screening cutoffs differ between the pooled studies; it should not
be read as a prevalence of a discrete disease state.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39088112
reference_title: 'Prevalence of intrinsic capacity decline among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The pooled prevalence of IC decline in community settings was 67.8% (95% CI: 57.0-78.5%; P < 0.001).
explanation: The pooled community estimate this record reports.
- population: Primary-care users aged 60 years and older, Occitania region, France (ICOPE Step 1 screening)
measure_type: POINT_PREVALENCE
prevalence_class: ABOVE_1_IN_1000
rate_per_100000: 94300.0
notes: >-
Positive Step 1 screen in a real-world implementation of 10 903 people. Even
higher than the pooled community figure, which is informative about the
instrument rather than the population: a screen designed for sensitivity in a
self-selected primary-care sample calls almost everyone positive, and only 9.3%
went on to Step 2.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36098317
reference_title: 'Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
10 285 (94·3%) participants had a positive intrinsic capacity result during screening at baseline.
explanation: The screening-positive proportion this record reports.
progression:
- phase: Heterogeneous multi-domain trajectories rather than one uniform slope
notes: >-
The clinically useful fact about progression here is that there is no single
course. Group-based multi-trajectory modelling over four years separates
distinct patterns - decline in all domains, isolated locomotor decline, isolated
psychological decline, and two largely preserved patterns - which is why a single
composite score can hide the thing that matters for care planning.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37620614
reference_title: Association between aging-related biomarkers and longitudinal trajectories of intrinsic capacity in older adults.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Five IC multi-trajectory groups were determined: low in all domains (8.4%), low locomotion (24.6%), low psychological domain (16.7%), robust (i.e., high in all domains except vitality; 28.3%), and robust with high vitality (22.0%).
explanation: >-
Names and quantifies the distinct trajectory groups in 1271 MAPT participants
followed for four years.
- reference: PMID:38029399
reference_title: 'Multi-Trajectories of Intrinsic Capacity Decline and Their Impact on Age-Related Outcomes: A 20-Year National Longitudinal Cohort Study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
We identified four subtypes of IC decline: robust with mild decline (n=902), hearing loss with cognitive decline (n=197), physio-cognitive decline (PCD) with depression (n=373), and severe IC decline (n=310).
explanation: >-
Independent replication of the multi-trajectory finding in 1782 Taiwanese
participants, and it recovers different groupings from the MAPT analysis - which
is why this section reports that trajectories are heterogeneous rather than
naming a canonical set.
- reference: PMID:38029399
reference_title: 'Multi-Trajectories of Intrinsic Capacity Decline and Their Impact on Age-Related Outcomes: A 20-Year National Longitudinal Cohort Study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Individuals in the severe IC decline group faced a substantially increased risk of all outcomes of interest.
explanation: >-
Shows the trajectories carry different outcome risks, so the grouping is
prognostically meaningful rather than descriptive.
- reference: PMID:37517058
reference_title: 'Exploring the natural history of intrinsic capacity impairments: longitudinal patterns in the 10/66 study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
A total of 61% of the participants worsened over time, 35% were stable, and 3% improved to a healthier status.
explanation: >-
Quantifies the direction of movement between capacity states in 14 923
participants across eight middle-income countries, including the small but
non-zero fraction who improve.
- phase: Progression to loss of activities of daily living and care dependence
notes: >-
Intrinsic capacity predicts subsequent dependence, and does so more strongly than
multimorbidity does - which is the empirical claim that justifies treating
capacity rather than disease count as the target of care in this population.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31678933
reference_title: The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
More of the indirect effect of personal characteristics on incident loss of ADLs and IADLs was mediated by intrinsic capacity than multimorbidity.
explanation: >-
Establishes both the progression to dependence and its precedence over
multimorbidity as a mediator.
- reference: PMID:38945130
reference_title: 'Association of intrinsic capacity with functional decline and mortality in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Intrinsic capacity is inversely associated with functional decline and mortality risk in older adults.
explanation: >-
The pooled conclusion of 37 longitudinal studies and 206 693 participants, which
is the broadest evidence that capacity loss progresses to dependence and death.
- phase: Prediction of dementia and death, above what frailty measures capture
notes: >-
The reason to measure capacity rather than count deficits is that it predicts the
hard outcomes at least as well and adds information beyond frailty instruments
built on the same underlying tests. Two independent cohorts show this over a
decade or more.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41086232
reference_title: Intrinsic Capacity Predictors of Dementia and Mortality in the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
IC was associated with lower hazard (risk) of dementia (HR = 0.567, p < 0.001) over 10-year and lower hazard of mortality (HR = 0.649, p < 0.001) over 12-year, controlling for age, sex, and education.
explanation: >-
Gives the long-horizon effect sizes for both outcomes in an Australian cohort
that also replicates the five-factor structure this entry's subtypes encode.
- reference: PMID:41086232
reference_title: Intrinsic Capacity Predictors of Dementia and Mortality in the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Finally, IC explained additional variance beyond the Frailty Phenotype when predicting both incident dementia and mortality risk.
explanation: >-
The specific claim that capacity is not redundant with frailty, which is the
justification for curating this entry separately from frailty.
- reference: PMID:37517058
reference_title: 'Exploring the natural history of intrinsic capacity impairments: longitudinal patterns in the 10/66 study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Participants with deteriorated IC had a significantly higher risk of frailty, disability and dementia than people with high IC.
explanation: >-
Establishes the same ordering - capacity loss precedes frailty, disability and
dementia - in a low- and middle-income-country cohort rather than a
high-income one.
- phase: Secular improvement across birth cohorts
notes: >-
Recorded because it cuts against the natural reading of the rest of this section.
The trajectory of an individual is downward, but successive birth cohorts enter
old age with more capacity and lose it more slowly, so population-level burden is
not simply a function of chronological ageing.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39702725
reference_title: Cohort trends in intrinsic capacity in England and China.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
we found that more recent cohorts entered older ages with higher levels of capacity, while subsequent age-related declines were somewhat compressed compared to earlier cohorts.
explanation: >-
Establishes the cohort effect in two independent national ageing cohorts
(ELSA and CHARLS).
clinical_burden:
burden_level: HIGH
rationale: >-
The burden is high not because any one domain is severe but because the composite
predicts the outcomes that matter most: pooled across 37 longitudinal studies and
206 693 participants, lower intrinsic capacity is inversely associated with both
functional decline and mortality, and the relationship is graded across the whole
range rather than confined to a severely impaired tail. The condition is also close to universal in the
population it is defined for, with more than two-thirds of community-dwelling
older adults screening positive, so even a modest per-person effect aggregates
into a large population burden. Against that, it is the one geriatric burden with
a demonstrated intervention response, which is why it is a target rather than
merely a prognostic marker.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38945130
reference_title: 'Association of intrinsic capacity with functional decline and mortality in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Intrinsic capacity is inversely associated with functional decline and mortality risk in older adults.
explanation: >-
The pooled association with both functional decline and mortality that underlies
the HIGH assessment.
- reference: PMID:38945130
reference_title: 'Association of intrinsic capacity with functional decline and mortality in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
We included 37 studies (206 693 participants; average age range 65·3-85·9 years) in the systematic review
explanation: >-
Establishes the scale of the pooled evidence quoted in the rationale.
- reference: PMID:35963450
reference_title: 'Intrinsic capacity and 10-year mortality: Findings from a cohort of older people.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
IC is associated with mortality in a dose-response fashion.
explanation: >-
Supports the graded rather than threshold character of the burden, in a 10-year
cohort of 2032 people aged 70 and over.
- reference: PMID:37434422
reference_title: 'Association of intrinsic capacity with incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease: Prospective study in UK Biobank.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
IC deficit score is a powerful predictor of functional trajectories and vulnerabilities of the individual in relation to CVD incidence and premature death.
explanation: >-
Extends the burden beyond function and all-cause death to incident
cardiovascular disease in 443 130 participants.
- reference: PMID:40927083
reference_title: Impact of Intrinsic Capacity on 5-year Mortality of Older Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
A total of 86 patients (16.5%) experienced all-cause mortality over the 5-year follow-up period.
explanation: >-
Shows the burden is not confined to community populations: it is measurable in
an already-sick hospital cardiology cohort over five years.
- reference: PMID:37886051
reference_title: 'Associations of intrinsic capacity, fall risk and frailty in old inpatients.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Declined IC composite scores were associated with increased risks of falls [odds ratio (OR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.72] and frailty (OR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.37-0.54) among older hospitalized patients after adjusting for the related potential confounders.
explanation: >-
Adds falls to the burden picture in 703 inpatients aged 75 and over, which is
the proximate harm most likely to trigger the next admission.
pathophysiology:
- name: Accumulation of Hallmark Ageing Damage
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
role: trigger
conforms_to: cellular_senescence#Senescence-Inducing Stress
description: >-
The upstream lesion is not a single defect but the parallel accumulation of the
twelve hallmarks of ageing - genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic
drift, loss of proteostasis, disabled macroautophagy, deregulated nutrient
sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion,
altered intercellular communication, chronic inflammation, and dysbiosis. This
node stands for that accumulating damage load; the individual hallmarks are
modelled in their own modules rather than restated here.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: DNA damage response
term:
id: GO:0006974
label: DNA damage response
modifier: INCREASED
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36599349
reference_title: 'Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
We propose the following twelve hallmarks of aging: genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, disabled macroautophagy, deregulated nutrient-sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, altered intercellular communication, chronic inflammation, and dysbiosis.
explanation: >-
Enumerates the damage set this node stands for. Evidence source is OTHER
because this is a synthesis review.
- reference: PMID:23746838
reference_title: The hallmarks of aging.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Aging is characterized by a progressive loss of physiological integrity, leading to impaired function and increased vulnerability to death.
explanation: >-
States the loss-of-integrity framing that connects this molecular node to the
organism-level reserve loss downstream.
downstream:
- target: Mitochondrial Bioenergetic Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Senescent Cell Accumulation in Ageing Tissue
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Decline in Tissue Regenerative Reserve
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Mitochondrial Bioenergetic Decline
biological_scale: CELLULAR
role: effector
conforms_to: mitochondrial_dysfunction#Bioenergetic Decline and Oxidative Stress
description: >-
Age-associated mitochondrial damage lowers oxidative phosphorylation capacity
while raising reactive oxygen species output. This is the cellular step closest
to the vitality domain, which the WHO working definition frames in terms of
energy and metabolism, and it is one of the two hallmark axes for which human
plasma markers separate intrinsic-capacity trajectories.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: oxidative phosphorylation
term:
id: GO:0006119
label: oxidative phosphorylation
modifier: DECREASED
- preferred_term: reactive oxygen species metabolic process
term:
id: GO:0072593
label: reactive oxygen species metabolic process
modifier: INCREASED
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37620614
reference_title: Association between aging-related biomarkers and longitudinal trajectories of intrinsic capacity in older adults.
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Our findings found that plasma biomarkers reflecting inflammation and mitochondrial impairment distinguished older people with multi-impaired IC trajectories from those with high-stable IC.
explanation: >-
Links mitochondrial impairment to measured intrinsic-capacity trajectories in
humans. Marked INDIRECT because the measurement is a circulating surrogate
(GDF-15) rather than mitochondrial function itself.
- reference: PMID:41113460
reference_title: 'Mitochondrial dysfunction in age-related sarcopenia: mechanistic insights, diagnostic advances, and therapeutic prospects.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Mitochondrial dysfunction plays a central role, characterized by impaired biogenesis, excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, compromised autophagy/mitophagy, and accumulation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations.
explanation: >-
Specifies the mitochondrial defects this node stands for, in the tissue where
they reach a measured capacity domain.
- reference: PMID:38396729
reference_title: Mitochondrial Quantity and Quality in Age-Related Sarcopenia.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Mitochondrial dysfunction has been indicated as a key contributor to skeletal myocyte decline and loss of physical performance with aging.
explanation: >-
Independent review naming loss of physical performance - the measured content of
the locomotor domain - as the downstream consequence of this node.
downstream:
- target: Chronic Low-Grade Sterile Inflammation
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ Systems
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
- name: Senescent Cell Accumulation in Ageing Tissue
biological_scale: CELLULAR
role: effector
conforms_to: cellular_senescence#Senescent Cell Accumulation
description: >-
Cells that have entered senescence are cleared less efficiently with age and
accumulate in tissue, where their secretory phenotype sustains local and systemic
inflammation. This is the principal cellular source feeding the inflammaging node.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: cellular senescence
term:
id: GO:0090398
label: cellular senescence
modifier: INCREASED
cell_types:
- preferred_term: fibroblast
term:
id: CL:0000057
label: fibroblast
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36599349
reference_title: 'Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Aging is driven by hallmarks fulfilling the following three premises: (1) their age-associated manifestation, (2) the acceleration of aging by experimentally accentuating them, and (3) the opportunity to decelerate, stop, or reverse aging by therapeutic interventions on them.
explanation: >-
Supplies the criterion under which cellular senescence counts as a driver of
ageing rather than a correlate, which is what licenses this node as causal.
downstream:
- target: Chronic Low-Grade Sterile Inflammation
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Chronic Low-Grade Sterile Inflammation
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: amplifier
conforms_to: inflammaging#Chronic Low-Grade Sterile Inflammation
description: >-
Persistent, low-grade systemic inflammation without overt infection - inflammaging.
In this entry it is the hallmark axis with the most direct human evidence against
measured intrinsic capacity: circulating IL-6 and TNF receptor-1 both raise the
risk of belonging to the worst multi-domain capacity trajectory.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: inflammatory response
term:
id: GO:0006954
label: inflammatory response
modifier: INCREASED
- preferred_term: cytokine production
term:
id: GO:0001816
label: cytokine production
modifier: INCREASED
cell_types:
- preferred_term: leukocyte
term:
id: CL:0000738
label: leukocyte
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37620614
reference_title: Association between aging-related biomarkers and longitudinal trajectories of intrinsic capacity in older adults.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Higher IL-6 and GDF-15 also increased the risk of being in the "low locomotion" group.
explanation: >-
Ties the inflammatory axis specifically to a domain-level capacity trajectory
rather than to a global score alone.
- reference: PMID:38145874
reference_title: 'From biological aging to functional decline: Insights into chronic inflammation and intrinsic capacity.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Chronic inflammation, a mechanism of aging, is associated with decreased intrinsic capacity, which may mirror the broader relationship between aging and functional ability.
explanation: >-
The one review written specifically about this node's link to intrinsic
capacity, rather than about inflammaging in general.
downstream:
- target: Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ Systems
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Decline in Tissue Regenerative Reserve
biological_scale: TISSUE
role: effector
conforms_to: stem_cell_exhaustion#Decline in Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Function
description: >-
Loss of tissue-specific stem cell number and function erodes the capacity to
repair after everyday injury. This is the arm of the cascade that converts
accumulated damage into a falling ceiling on recovery, and it is the reason
capacity loss compounds after acute insults such as hospitalisation.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: stem cell population maintenance
term:
id: GO:0019827
label: stem cell population maintenance
modifier: DECREASED
- preferred_term: tissue regeneration
term:
id: GO:0042246
label: tissue regeneration
modifier: DECREASED
cell_types:
- preferred_term: stem cell
term:
id: CL:0000034
label: stem cell
evidence:
- reference: PMID:23746838
reference_title: The hallmarks of aging.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
These hallmarks are: genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and altered intercellular communication.
explanation: >-
Establishes stem cell exhaustion as one of the canonical hallmarks this node
instantiates.
downstream:
- target: Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ Systems
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ Systems
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: central_effector
description: >-
The convergence point of the entry. Reserve is the margin by which an organ
system's capacity exceeds the demand placed on it; when repeated repair after
everyday injury leaves progressive tissue degeneration, that margin narrows
across systems simultaneously. This is where the entry's own content begins:
everything upstream is generic ageing biology, and everything downstream is
measured as intrinsic capacity.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:34883201
reference_title: A gerophysiology perspective on healthy ageing.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
While robustness is associated with homeostasis achieved by an optimal structure/function relationship in all organs, successive repair processes occurring after daily injuries and infections result in accumulation of scar healing leading to progressive tissue degeneration, allostasis and frailty.
explanation: >-
States the whole-organism reserve-erosion model this node encodes, and is the
review that explicitly joins the geroscience hallmarks to the WHO intrinsic
capacity framework.
downstream:
- target: Locomotor Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Vitality Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Cognitive Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- target: Psychological Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
- target: Sensory Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
- name: Vitality Capacity Decline
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: effector
subtypes:
- Vitality
description: >-
Loss of the energy, metabolic, neuromuscular, and immune-stress-response capacity
that the WHO working definition identifies as the physiological determinant of
intrinsic capacity. Clinically it appears as the anorexia of ageing, unintentional
weight loss, and fatigue. It is placed upstream of the locomotor domain here
because both the WHO working definition and a subsequent framework analysis treat
it as the highest-order, energy-dependent domain on which the others rest. That
ordering is argued from physiology rather than demonstrated by intervention.
locations:
- preferred_term: Whole organism (energy metabolism, neuromuscular and immune systems)
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36356628
reference_title: WHO working definition of vitality capacity for healthy longevity monitoring.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Vitality capacity is considered the underlying physiological determinant of intrinsic capacity.
explanation: Supports both the content of the node and its upstream placement.
- reference: PMID:40060276
reference_title: The Biological Rationale for Integrating Intrinsic Capacity Into Frailty Models.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
The vitality domain or energy metabolism-related capacity, is the highest order dimension and the basis of other intrinsic capacity domains.
explanation: >-
Directly supports placing this node upstream of the other four domains, which is
the entry's one non-obvious ordering decision.
- reference: PMID:40060276
reference_title: The Biological Rationale for Integrating Intrinsic Capacity Into Frailty Models.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Vitality vulnerability manifests as a pre-frailty status in function-centered healthy aging.
explanation: >-
Places loss of this domain at the pre-frailty stage, which is where the
intervention evidence in this entry is concentrated.
- reference: PMID:26195100
reference_title: Anorexia of Aging.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
The anorexia of aging is common, leading to adverse health consequences.
explanation: >-
Supports the principal clinical expression of this node, which is what ICOPE
Step 1 screens for in the vitality items.
downstream:
- target: Locomotor Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Locomotor Capacity Decline
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: effector
subtypes:
- Locomotor
description: >-
Loss of muscle strength, gait speed, and balance, whose principal tissue substrate
is sarcopenia - a muscle disease in its own right, accruing across the lifespan
and defined by low muscle strength with confirmatory low muscle quantity. This is
the domain that most consistently predicts dependence in basic activities of
daily living.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: skeletal muscle atrophy
term:
id: GO:0014732
label: skeletal muscle atrophy
modifier: INCREASED
cell_types:
- preferred_term: skeletal muscle fiber
term:
id: CL:0008002
label: skeletal muscle fiber
locations:
- preferred_term: Skeletal muscle
term:
id: UBERON:0001134
label: skeletal muscle tissue
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30312372
reference_title: 'Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
sarcopenia is a muscle disease (muscle failure) rooted in adverse muscle changes that accrue across a lifetime; sarcopenia is common among adults of older age but can also occur earlier in life
explanation: >-
Establishes the tissue-level process underlying this domain and its lifelong
accrual, which is why locomotor decline is detectable well before old age.
downstream:
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Cognitive Capacity Decline
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: effector
subtypes:
- Cognitive
description: >-
Loss of memory, orientation, and executive function short of dementia. The domain
is continuous with, but not the same as, incident dementia: capacity deficits
raise dementia risk about twofold on their own and multiplicatively in
combination with high polygenic risk.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: cognition
term:
id: GO:0050890
label: cognition
modifier: DECREASED
cell_types:
- preferred_term: neuron
term:
id: CL:0000540
label: neuron
locations:
- preferred_term: Brain
term:
id: UBERON:0000955
label: brain
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38843484
reference_title: 'Intrinsic Capacity, Polygenic Risk Score, APOE Genotype, and Risk of Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on the UK Biobank.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
In the joint analysis, for participants with a high polygenic risk score (PRS) and an IC score of 4 or more, the HR of all-cause dementia was 8.11 (95% CI 6.28-10.47) compared with individuals with a low PRS and an IC score of 0.
explanation: >-
Quantifies the joint effect of capacity deficit and genetic susceptibility,
which is the strongest evidence that this domain is not merely prodromal
dementia relabelled.
downstream:
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Psychological Capacity Decline
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: effector
subtypes:
- Psychological
description: >-
Loss of mood, motivation, and sociability. In the INSPIRE-T cohort it is the
domain that responds across the whole range of pain intensity, including mild
pain, whereas the other domains respond only from moderate intensity upward -
making it the most sensitive domain to a treatable exposure.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41360071
reference_title: 'The association of pain with intrinsic capacity and the moderating role of inflammation in France: a cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRE-T project.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Pain was associated with reduced intrinsic capacity, with no evidence of a moderating role of iAge in this association.
explanation: >-
Supports the node and, in its negative half, records that the inflammatory-age
clock did not moderate the association - relevant because the entry's upstream
chain runs through inflammation.
downstream:
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Sensory Capacity Decline
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: effector
subtypes:
- Sensory
description: >-
Age-related hearing and vision loss. Measurement work finds the two do not form a
single factor, so this node bundles two anatomically separate ageing processes
that happen to be screened together. Its edge to the cognitive domain reflects the
widely reported sensory-cognitive coupling and is marked INDIRECT because the one
randomised test of that link was null overall.
locations:
- preferred_term: Inner ear
term:
id: UBERON:0001846
label: internal ear
- preferred_term: Eye
term:
id: UBERON:0000970
label: eye
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37960903
reference_title: 'The icope Intrinsic Capacity Screening Tool: Measurement Structure and Predictive Validity of Dependence and Hospitalization.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Vision and hearing items did not form a single sensory domain, so six domains were considered.
explanation: >-
Supports modelling this node as a bundle rather than a single mechanism.
downstream:
- target: Cognitive Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: consequence
description: >-
The measured construct itself: a general capacity factor over the five domains.
Modelling it as a node rather than as a mere sum matters because the general
factor carries predictive information the individual domains do not, and because
it is the level at which interventions and the ICD-11 code are defined.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31678933
reference_title: The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The summary score of intrinsic capacity and specific subfactors showed good construct validity.
explanation: >-
Supports treating the composite as a coherent measured entity rather than an
arithmetic convenience.
downstream:
- target: Loss of Functional Ability and Care Dependence
causal_link_type: DIRECT
- name: Loss of Functional Ability and Care Dependence
biological_scale: ORGANISM
role: consequence
description: >-
The terminal state of the chain: inability to carry out the activities that
matter, and eventual dependence on others. In the WHO model this is functional
ability, which is intrinsic capacity as modified by environment - so the
environment can widen or narrow the gap between the two, and this node is the only
one in the entry whose value is not a property of the individual alone.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:31678933
reference_title: The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The WHO construct of intrinsic capacity appears to provide valuable predictive information on an individual's subsequent functioning, even after accounting for the number of multimorbidities.
explanation: >-
Supports the edge from measured capacity to subsequent functioning, adjusted
for the obvious confounder.
- reference: PMID:34571043
reference_title: 'Associations Between Intrinsic Capacity and Adverse Events Among Nursing Home Residents: The INCUR Study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Our results contribute to preliminary evidence linking greater IC levels and lower risk of late-life adverse outcomes.
explanation: >-
Extends the same relationship into the nursing-home setting, where the
construct had barely been tested.
phenotypes:
- category: Locomotor
name: Muscle weakness
subtype: Locomotor
frequency: FREQUENT
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Reduced muscle strength on chair-rise testing
term:
id: HP:0001324
label: Muscle weakness
clinical_course: PROGRESSIVE
description: >-
Reduced strength, screened in ICOPE by the ability to rise from a chair five
times without using the arms. Low muscle strength is the defining feature of
sarcopenia in the EWGSOP2 consensus, which makes this the phenotype where the
locomotor domain touches a named disease.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35395736
reference_title: 'Intrinsic capacity of older people in the community using WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework: a cross-sectional study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The percentage of impairment in locomotion (117, 39.8%), cognition (75, 25.5%), psychological well-being (34, 11.6%), vision (75, 24.7%), hearing capacity (82, 27.9%), and vitality (8, 2.7%).
explanation: >-
Gives the domain-wise impairment frequencies used across this phenotype section;
locomotion at 39.8% places this phenotype in the FREQUENT band.
- reference: PMID:37960903
reference_title: 'The icope Intrinsic Capacity Screening Tool: Measurement Structure and Predictive Validity of Dependence and Hospitalization.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The least preserved indicators were ability to recall three words (18%) and to perform chair stands (54%).
explanation: >-
Identifies chair-rise failure as one of the two least preserved screening
indicators in the Toledo cohort, which is the operational form of this phenotype.
- reference: PMID:30312372
reference_title: 'Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
focuses on low muscle strength as a key characteristic of sarcopenia
explanation: >-
Anchors the phenotype to the consensus definition of the muscle disease that
underlies it.
- category: Locomotor
name: Impaired gait and balance
subtype: Locomotor
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Slowed gait and impaired balance
term:
id: HP:0001288
label: Gait disturbance
clinical_course: PROGRESSIVE
description: >-
Slowed walking speed and impaired balance, assessed in the ICOPE pathway by gait
speed and by the Short Physical Performance Battery at Step 2. Frequency is not
recorded separately from the locomotor domain as a whole.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38676323
reference_title: 'Predictive Capacity of the Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments: Results From the INSPIRE-T Cohort.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Responses at screening were compared to results of the subsequent in-depth assessment (ie, Mini-Mental State Examination, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Short Physical Performance Battery, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and clinical investigation of vision problems)
explanation: >-
Establishes the Short Physical Performance Battery - a timed gait, balance and
chair-rise composite - as the reference measure for the locomotion domain.
- category: Cognitive
name: Memory impairment
subtype: Cognitive
frequency: OCCASIONAL
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Failure of three-word recall
term:
id: HP:0002354
label: Memory impairment
description: >-
Short-term recall failure, screened by three-word recall. In the Toledo cohort
this was the single least preserved of all ICOPE screening indicators.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37960903
reference_title: 'The icope Intrinsic Capacity Screening Tool: Measurement Structure and Predictive Validity of Dependence and Hospitalization.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The least preserved indicators were ability to recall three words (18%) and to perform chair stands (54%).
explanation: >-
Only 18% of participants preserved three-word recall, making this the most
commonly impaired screening indicator.
- reference: PMID:35395736
reference_title: 'Intrinsic capacity of older people in the community using WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework: a cross-sectional study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The percentage of impairment in locomotion (117, 39.8%), cognition (75, 25.5%), psychological well-being (34, 11.6%), vision (75, 24.7%), hearing capacity (82, 27.9%), and vitality (8, 2.7%).
explanation: >-
Cognitive-domain impairment at 25.5% on full assessment places this phenotype in
the OCCASIONAL band.
- category: Cognitive
name: Cognitive impairment
subtype: Cognitive
frequency: OCCASIONAL
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Cognitive impairment short of dementia
term:
id: HP:0100543
label: Cognitive impairment
description: >-
Impairment of orientation and executive function below the threshold for
dementia. Distinguished from dementia deliberately: the ICOPE pathway screens
this domain in order to intervene before a dementia diagnosis is reachable.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38843484
reference_title: 'Intrinsic Capacity, Polygenic Risk Score, APOE Genotype, and Risk of Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on the UK Biobank.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Compared with participants with an IC score of 0, individuals with an IC score of 4+ had a markedly elevated risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, 95% CI 1.92-2.45).
explanation: >-
Shows the phenotype is prognostically distinct from dementia rather than an
early label for it, since it predicts incident dementia in people who did not
have it at baseline.
- category: Vitality
name: Malnutrition
subtype: Vitality
frequency: VERY_RARE
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Malnutrition on Mini Nutritional Assessment
term:
id: HP:0004395
label: Malnutrition
description: >-
Impaired nutritional status on the Mini Nutritional Assessment used at ICOPE Step
2. The very low measured frequency is worth flagging: it comes from a
community-centre sample in Hong Kong, and vitality is the domain whose measured
prevalence varies most between instruments, so this frequency should not be
generalised.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35395736
reference_title: 'Intrinsic capacity of older people in the community using WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework: a cross-sectional study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The percentage of impairment in locomotion (117, 39.8%), cognition (75, 25.5%), psychological well-being (34, 11.6%), vision (75, 24.7%), hearing capacity (82, 27.9%), and vitality (8, 2.7%).
explanation: >-
Vitality-domain impairment at 2.7% in this community sample is the source of the
VERY_RARE band recorded here.
- category: Vitality
name: Unintentional weight loss and appetite loss
subtype: Vitality
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Unintentional weight loss
term:
id: HP:0001824
label: Weight loss
description: >-
Recent unintentional weight loss and loss of appetite - the anorexia of ageing -
which are the two questions the ICOPE Step 1 screen uses for the vitality domain.
No approved pharmacological treatment exists.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26195100
reference_title: Anorexia of Aging.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
The anorexia of aging is common, leading to adverse health consequences.
explanation: >-
Supports the phenotype and its consequences. Evidence source is OTHER because
this is a narrative clinical review.
- reference: PMID:26195100
reference_title: Anorexia of Aging.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
There are currently no approved pharmacologic treatment strategies to prevent or treat the anorexia of aging.
explanation: >-
Records the therapeutic vacuum for this phenotype, which is why the treatments
section carries no pharmacological entry for the vitality domain.
- category: Psychological
name: Depressive symptoms
subtype: Psychological
frequency: OCCASIONAL
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Depressive symptoms on geriatric depression screening
term:
id: HP:0000716
label: Depression
description: >-
Low mood and loss of interest, screened by geriatric depression items at Step 1
and by the PHQ-9 at Step 2. The phenotype is the ICOPE psychological domain, not
a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, which remains a differential.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35395736
reference_title: 'Intrinsic capacity of older people in the community using WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework: a cross-sectional study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The percentage of impairment in locomotion (117, 39.8%), cognition (75, 25.5%), psychological well-being (34, 11.6%), vision (75, 24.7%), hearing capacity (82, 27.9%), and vitality (8, 2.7%).
explanation: >-
Psychological-domain impairment at 11.6% places this phenotype in the
OCCASIONAL band.
- category: Sensory
name: Hearing impairment
subtype: Sensory
frequency: OCCASIONAL
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Age-related hearing impairment
term:
id: HP:0000365
label: Hearing impairment
clinical_course: PROGRESSIVE
description: >-
Age-related hearing loss, screened by a whisper test or self-report. It is
associated with faster cognitive decline observationally, but correcting it did
not slow cognitive decline in the one randomised test - see the treatments
section.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35395736
reference_title: 'Intrinsic capacity of older people in the community using WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework: a cross-sectional study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The percentage of impairment in locomotion (117, 39.8%), cognition (75, 25.5%), psychological well-being (34, 11.6%), vision (75, 24.7%), hearing capacity (82, 27.9%), and vitality (8, 2.7%).
explanation: >-
Hearing impairment at 27.9% places this phenotype in the OCCASIONAL band.
- reference: PMID:37478886
reference_title: 'Hearing intervention versus health education control to reduce cognitive decline in older adults with hearing loss in the USA (ACHIEVE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Hearing loss is associated with increased cognitive decline and incident dementia in older adults.
explanation: >-
States the observational association with the cognitive domain that motivates
screening for this phenotype.
- category: Sensory
name: Visual impairment
subtype: Sensory
frequency: OCCASIONAL
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Age-related visual impairment
term:
id: HP:0000505
label: Visual impairment
clinical_course: PROGRESSIVE
description: >-
Reduced vision, screened by self-reported difficulty and near-vision testing. It
is the domain where the ICOPE screen is most sensitive and least specific, so a
positive vision screen carries less information than a positive screen in any
other domain.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35395736
reference_title: 'Intrinsic capacity of older people in the community using WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework: a cross-sectional study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The percentage of impairment in locomotion (117, 39.8%), cognition (75, 25.5%), psychological well-being (34, 11.6%), vision (75, 24.7%), hearing capacity (82, 27.9%), and vitality (8, 2.7%).
explanation: >-
Vision impairment at 24.7% places this phenotype in the OCCASIONAL band.
- reference: PMID:38676323
reference_title: 'Predictive Capacity of the Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments: Results From the INSPIRE-T Cohort.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
High specificity (>70%) was observed for all the IC domains, except for vision (2.7%).
explanation: >-
Quantifies the specificity failure in this domain that the description warns
about.
biochemical:
- name: Plasma interleukin-6
presence: Elevated in the worst multi-domain intrinsic-capacity trajectory
context: Community-dwelling older adults followed for four years in the MAPT trial cohort.
subtype: Vitality
notes: >-
Recorded as a correlate of trajectory group, not as a diagnostic threshold. No
reference interval is given because none has been established for this use.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37620614
reference_title: Association between aging-related biomarkers and longitudinal trajectories of intrinsic capacity in older adults.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Higher IL-6 and GDF-15 also increased the risk of being in the "low locomotion" group.
explanation: >-
Associates circulating IL-6 with a specific impaired-capacity trajectory in 1271
participants.
- name: Plasma growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15)
presence: Elevated in the worst multi-domain intrinsic-capacity trajectory
context: Community-dwelling older adults followed for four years in the MAPT trial cohort.
subtype: Vitality
notes: >-
The strongest of the tested markers against capacity trajectories, and the one
usually read as reflecting mitochondrial stress rather than inflammation - which
is why it is the biochemical anchor for the mitochondrial arm of this entry's
pathophysiology.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37620614
reference_title: Association between aging-related biomarkers and longitudinal trajectories of intrinsic capacity in older adults.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
GDF-15 outperformed other biomarkers by showing the strongest associations with IC trajectory groups.
explanation: >-
Ranks GDF-15 above the inflammatory markers for association with capacity
trajectories.
- name: C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-alpha
presence: Reported both elevated and unchanged across studies of intrinsic capacity
context: Reviewed across the intrinsic-capacity literature rather than measured in one cohort.
notes: >-
Included to record a negative: no inflammatory marker currently has the specificity
and sensitivity to track capacity decline, and results for CRP and TNF-alpha are
inconsistent between studies and between domains. This is the honest state of
biomarker development for this entity, and it is why the two markers above are
recorded as trajectory correlates rather than as a monitoring panel.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38145874
reference_title: 'From biological aging to functional decline: Insights into chronic inflammation and intrinsic capacity.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha may potentially indicate changes in intrinsic capacity, but their results with intrinsic capacity or each intrinsic capacity domain are inconsistent.
explanation: >-
Names the candidate markers and states the inconsistency in one sentence.
- reference: PMID:38145874
reference_title: 'From biological aging to functional decline: Insights into chronic inflammation and intrinsic capacity.'
supports: REFUTE
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
To date, there is still no inflammatory markers with high specificity and sensitivity to monitor intrinsic capacity decline.
explanation: >-
Refutes any reading of the two markers above as clinically usable monitoring
tests, which is a claim this section could otherwise be taken to make.
genetic:
- name: Polygenic background of intrinsic capacity
relationship_type: SUSCEPTIBILITY
association: >-
Common variation of small individual effect, explaining roughly a fifth to a
quarter of variance in measured intrinsic capacity.
notes: >-
No gene_term is bound because the claim is about the aggregate architecture rather
than any one locus: the GWAS maps 4289 candidate SNPs to 197 genes and the abstract
names none of them individually, so naming a lead gene here would be a curatorial
invention rather than a curatorial reading. Per-gene entries should be added when a
replicated locus is characterised.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41066301
reference_title: A genome-wide association study identified 10 novel genomic loci associated with intrinsic capacity.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The h2snp for IC was estimated at 25.2% in UKB and 19.5% in CLSA. Our GWAS identified 38 independent SNPs for IC across 10 genomic loci and 4289 candidate SNPs, mapped to 197 genes.
explanation: >-
The first GWAS of intrinsic capacity, giving both the heritability estimate and
the locus count in two independent cohorts (UK Biobank n=44 631, CLSA n=13 085).
- reference: PMID:41066301
reference_title: A genome-wide association study identified 10 novel genomic loci associated with intrinsic capacity.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Post-GWAS analysis revealed the role of these genes in cellular processes such as cell proliferation, immune function, metabolism, and neurodegeneration, with high expression in muscle, heart, brain, adipose, and nerve tissues.
explanation: >-
Worth recording because the tissue enrichment recovers the same organs this
entry's domain nodes are anchored in, independently of how those nodes were
chosen.
- name: APOE
gene_term:
preferred_term: APOE
term:
id: hgnc:613
label: APOE
relationship_type: MODIFIER
association: >-
Does not cause capacity decline, but multiplies the dementia risk that a given
level of capacity deficit carries.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38843484
reference_title: 'Intrinsic Capacity, Polygenic Risk Score, APOE Genotype, and Risk of Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on the UK Biobank.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
In the joint analysis, for participants with a high polygenic risk score (PRS) and an IC score of 4 or more, the HR of all-cause dementia was 8.11 (95% CI 6.28-10.47) compared with individuals with a low PRS and an IC score of 0.
explanation: >-
Quantifies the joint effect. The hazard is far above the product of either factor
alone, which is what makes this a modifier rather than an additive risk.
inheritance:
- name: Polygenic inheritance
inheritance_term:
preferred_term: Polygenic inheritance
term:
id: HP:0010982
label: Polygenic inheritance
description: >-
Intrinsic capacity is a complex trait with many small-effect common variants, not a
Mendelian condition. SNP-based heritability is about 25% in UK Biobank and about
20% in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging - substantial, but leaving most of
the variance to environment, life course, and measurement. There is no carrier
state, no penetrance, and no consanguinity effect to record.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41066301
reference_title: A genome-wide association study identified 10 novel genomic loci associated with intrinsic capacity.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Overall, this study provides comprehensive evidence on the genetic architecture of IC, identifying novel genetic variants and biological pathways
explanation: >-
Establishes that the trait has a genetic architecture worth recording at all,
which was open before this study - the paper notes no prior GWAS existed.
environmental:
- name: Ambient and household air pollution
description: >-
Exposure to fine particulate matter, household solid-fuel combustion, and
secondhand smoke. A meta-analysis of 18 studies finds each raises the risk of
frailty in middle-aged and older adults, with the largest pooled effect for
secondhand smoke - although that estimate's confidence interval crosses one, so the
ordering of the three exposures is not established.
effect: Raises the risk of frailty, the clinical state that capacity loss progresses into
exposure_term:
preferred_term: exposure to air pollution
term:
id: ECTO:8000036
label: exposure to air pollution
notes: >-
The evidence is against frailty, not against intrinsic capacity. Those are related
but distinct constructs - this entry's own definitions section says so - and no
meta-analysis of air pollution against measured intrinsic capacity yet exists. The
mechanism edge is therefore marked PREDISPOSES with INDIRECT evidence rather than
asserted as a capacity effect, and it attaches at the reserve node rather than at
any single domain, because the frailty outcome does not resolve to one.
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ Systems
environmental_effect: PREDISPOSES
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_UNKNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
description: >-
Sustained particulate exposure is proposed to erode reserve through systemic
inflammation and oxidative stress, the same axes this entry's upstream nodes
already carry.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:40391839
reference_title: A systematic review and meta-analysis of air pollution and increased risk of frailty.
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Environmental exposures, including air pollution, the use of unclean household fuels and exposure to secondhand smoke, significantly increase the risk of frailty.
explanation: >-
Supports the edge through one inference step: the measured outcome is frailty,
and this entry models frailty as downstream of reserve loss rather than as the
same thing.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:40391839
reference_title: A systematic review and meta-analysis of air pollution and increased risk of frailty.
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Meta-analyses indicated a 19% increased risk of frailty due to air pollution (fine particulate matter ≤2.5 microns) [n = 9 studies; pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.27], a 28% increase with exposure to household solid fuels (n = 4 studies; OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.16-1.40) and a 59% increase due to exposure to secondhand smoke (n = 3 studies; OR 1.59; 95% CI 0.46-2.72).
explanation: >-
Gives the pooled effect sizes for all three exposures. Marked INDIRECT because
the outcome is frailty rather than measured intrinsic capacity.
- name: Chronic pain
description: >-
Self-reported pain over the preceding days, graded by intensity. Across a
lifespan cohort spanning ages 20 to 102, pain of any intensity was associated
with lower psychological capacity, and intense pain with lower scores in every
domain except sensory.
effect: Lowers measured intrinsic capacity, most consistently in the psychological domain
notes: >-
No ECTO or XCO term is bound. Exposure ontologies model pain poorly - it is an
experience rather than an environmental agent - and binding a stress or
nociceptive-stimulus term would misstate what was measured, which was
self-reported pain presence and intensity.
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Psychological Capacity Decline
environmental_effect: EXACERBATES
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Pain lowers psychological-domain scores across the whole intensity range,
including mild pain, which is not true of any other domain.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41360071
reference_title: 'The association of pain with intrinsic capacity and the moderating role of inflammation in France: a cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRE-T project.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Pain at all intensities, mild (0·512, 0·163, p=0·0017), moderate (1·111, 0·191, p<0·0001), or intense (1·532, 0·263, p<0·0001), was significantly associated with lower scores in the psychological domain.
explanation: >-
Supports the edge specifically, including the dose-response across intensity
bands.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41360071
reference_title: 'The association of pain with intrinsic capacity and the moderating role of inflammation in France: a cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRE-T project.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Both moderate pain (β 0·264, SE 0·076, p=0·0006) and intense pain (0·479, 0·105, p<0·0001) were negatively associated with intrinsic capacity values.
explanation: >-
Establishes the entry-level association between pain and the composite capacity
score in 971 INSPIRE-T participants.
- reference: PMID:41360071
reference_title: 'The association of pain with intrinsic capacity and the moderating role of inflammation in France: a cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRE-T project.'
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Further research is needed to determine whether effective pain management could help prevent declines in intrinsic capacity.
explanation: >-
The authors' own statement that the exposure is not yet demonstrated to be
causally modifiable, which is why this entry is recorded as an exacerbating
exposure rather than a treatment target.
- name: Acute hospitalisation
description: >-
Admission for acute illness, which in older adults is followed by functional and
cognitive decline independent of the admitting diagnosis. It is included as an
environmental exposure because it is a discrete, dated, often avoidable event that
steps intrinsic capacity down, unlike the continuous background of ageing.
effect: Precipitates a step decline in measured intrinsic capacity
notes: >-
No ECTO term is bound. Hospitalisation is a healthcare episode rather than an
environmental exposure in the ECTO sense, and no suitable term was found.
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
environmental_effect: EXACERBATES
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
The functional and cognitive decline that follows acute admission is a decrement
in the composite construct rather than in any one domain, which is why the edge
attaches at the composite node.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:40188489
reference_title: 'Exercise effects on intrinsic capacity in acutely hospitalised older adults: a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Hospitalisation often results in adverse effects in older adults, particularly an increased risk of functional and cognitive decline.
explanation: Supports the exposure acting on the composite construct.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:40188489
reference_title: 'Exercise effects on intrinsic capacity in acutely hospitalised older adults: a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
IC score at discharge was inversely associated with mortality risk during follow-up (OR = 0.98 per each increase in IC score at discharge, 95% CI = 0.96, 0.99, P = .010)
explanation: >-
Establishes that capacity measured at the end of this exposure carries prognostic
weight, in 570 patients of mean age 87.3 years.
treatments:
- name: Multicomponent Physical Activity with Nutritional Counselling
action_category: THERAPEUTIC
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
description: >-
Structured moderate-intensity physical activity, delivered twice weekly at a
centre and up to four times weekly at home with activity-monitor tailoring, plus
personalised nutritional counselling. In SPRINTT this reduced mobility disability
over an average 26 months in older adults with physical frailty and sarcopenia -
the largest randomised demonstration that the locomotor domain is modifiable.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: multicomponent physical activity and nutrition programme
term:
id: NCIT:C15900
label: Lifestyle Therapy
target_mechanisms:
- target: Locomotor Capacity Decline
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Slows the loss of muscle strength and physical performance that constitutes the
locomotor domain, and preserves appendicular lean mass.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:35545258
reference_title: 'Multicomponent intervention to prevent mobility disability in frail older adults: randomised controlled trial (SPRINTT project).'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Among participants with SPPB scores of 3-7, mobility disability occurred in 283/605 (46.8%) assigned to the multicomponent intervention and 316/600 (52.7%) controls (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.92; P=0.005).
explanation: >-
The primary randomised result in 1205 participants, giving the effect size for
this treatment on the locomotor domain's principal outcome.
- reference: PMID:35545258
reference_title: 'Multicomponent intervention to prevent mobility disability in frail older adults: randomised controlled trial (SPRINTT project).'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The between group difference in SPPB score was 0.8 points (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.1 points; P<0.001) and 1.0 point (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.6 points; P<0.001) in favour of the multicomponent intervention at 24 and 36 months, respectively.
explanation: >-
Gives the effect on the continuous physical-performance measure used at ICOPE
Step 2, which is the measure this entry's locomotor domain is scored on.
- reference: PMID:36341237
reference_title: 'Intrinsic capacity rather than intervention exposure influences reversal to robustness among prefrail community-dwelling older adults: A non-randomized controlled study of a multidomain exercise and nutrition intervention.'
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The differential risk profiles associated with prefrailty may be attributable to underlying intrinsic capacity (IC).
explanation: >-
A caution rather than a confirmation: in this non-randomised study baseline
capacity, not intervention exposure, predicted who reverted to robustness. It is
recorded here because it bears on who this treatment is expected to help.
- name: In-Hospital Multicomponent Exercise Training
action_category: THERAPEUTIC
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
description: >-
A supervised multicomponent exercise programme delivered during acute admission in
Acute Care for Elders units. It is the clearest demonstration that the composite
construct itself responds to intervention, and it does so over days rather than
years, in patients of mean age 87.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: in-hospital multicomponent exercise training
term:
id: NCIT:C15302
label: Physical Therapy
target_mechanisms:
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Raises the composite capacity score at discharge, with gains in every domain,
counteracting the step decline that hospitalisation otherwise produces.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:40188489
reference_title: 'Exercise effects on intrinsic capacity in acutely hospitalised older adults: a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The exercise intervention significantly improved IC compared to the control group [7.74 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.45-9.03, P < .001], with benefits observed in all IC domains.
explanation: >-
Randomised evidence that the composite score, not merely a single domain, is
modifiable.
- name: Combined Exercise and Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
action_category: THERAPEUTIC
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
description: >-
Six months of exercise with or without three months of added cognitive stimulation
therapy, in pre-frail older adults attending primary care. Included because it is
one of the few studies whose outcome is the intrinsic-capacity composite itself
rather than a single-domain proxy. It is a pre-post intervention study, not a
randomised trial, so the effect estimate is weaker than SPRINTT's.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: combined exercise and cognitive stimulation programme
term:
id: NCIT:C15900
label: Lifestyle Therapy
target_mechanisms:
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Improves the composite score and the locomotor domain within three months in
pre-frail participants.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38616369
reference_title: 'The Impact of Exercise and Cognitive Stimulation Therapy on Intrinsic Capacity Composite Score in Pre-Frail Older Adults: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.'
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
At 3 months, both Ex and Ex +CST showed improvement in IC composite scores
explanation: >-
Supports the effect on the composite. Marked INDIRECT because the design is
pre-post with a self-selected control group rather than randomised.
- name: Group-Based Multidomain Intervention with Brain-Structure Outcomes
action_category: THERAPEUTIC
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
description: >-
The ENHANCE randomised trial: twelve months of twice-weekly group sessions
combining physical exercise, cognitive training and nutrition education, against
quarterly telephone education. It is the one trial here with a structural imaging
endpoint, so it speaks to whether multidomain intervention reaches the substrate
of the cognitive domain rather than only its test scores. The trial is small - 88
completers, 76 with longitudinal MRI - and the groups differed at baseline in age
and BMI.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: group-based multidomain lifestyle intervention
term:
id: NCIT:C15900
label: Lifestyle Therapy
target_mechanisms:
- target: Cognitive Capacity Decline
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Slows loss of grey matter volume, the structural correlate of the cognitive
domain.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:40464147
reference_title: 'Enhancing Neurocognitive Health via Activity, Nutrition and Cognitive Exercise (ENHANCE): A Randomized Controlled Trial.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The ENHANCE trial delivered twice-weekly group-based multidomain sessions (physical exercise, cognitive training and nutrition education) in urban and rural communities for 12 months, while the control group received quarterly telephone education.
explanation: >-
Describes the intervention and its comparator, which is what this treatment
record encodes.
- reference: PMID:40464147
reference_title: 'Enhancing Neurocognitive Health via Activity, Nutrition and Cognitive Exercise (ENHANCE): A Randomized Controlled Trial.'
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The intervention group (n = 44; 75.0% female) was significantly older than the control group (n = 44; 70.5% female) (75.0 ± 6.6 vs. 72.3 ± 5.0 years, p = 0.035) and had lower BMI (23.4 vs. 25.2 kg/m2, p = 0.016) at baseline.
explanation: >-
Records the baseline imbalance, which limits how much weight the structural
result can carry. Marked INDIRECT because it bears on the claim by qualifying it.
- name: Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention for Cognitive Decline
action_category: THERAPEUTIC
therapeutic_modality: BEHAVIORAL
description: >-
Combined dietary guidance, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk
monitoring over two years in at-risk older adults, as tested in FINGER. The effect
on cognition is real but small, and the trial is included here as the benchmark
for what multidomain intervention achieves in the cognitive domain rather than as
a strong recommendation.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: multidomain lifestyle intervention
term:
id: NCIT:C15900
label: Lifestyle Therapy
target_mechanisms:
- target: Cognitive Capacity Decline
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Slows the rate of cognitive change measured by a comprehensive neuropsychological
battery.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:25771249
reference_title: 'A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Between-group difference in the change of NTB total score per year was 0·022 (95% CI 0·002-0·042, p=0·030).
explanation: >-
The primary randomised result in 1260 participants; the confidence interval
almost touching zero is why the description calls the effect small.
- reference: PMID:25771249
reference_title: 'A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Adverse events occurred in 46 (7%) participants in the intervention group compared with six (1%) participants in the control group; the most common adverse event was musculoskeletal pain (32 [5%] individuals for intervention vs no individuals for control).
explanation: >-
Records the harm side of the multidomain intervention, which is not zero and is
concentrated in the exercise component.
- name: ICOPE Integrated Person-Centred Care Pathway
action_category: THERAPEUTIC
therapeutic_modality: OTHER
description: >-
The WHO ICOPE care pathway itself, delivered as a service intervention: Step 1
screening, Step 2 in-depth assessment, a personalised care plan, referral, and
monitoring, coordinated by integrated care managers. A randomised trial in Beijing
primary care found it feasible and associated with small improvements in the
vitality, mobility, and psychological domains at six months.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: integrated person-centred care for older people
term:
id: NCIT:C15747
label: Supportive Care
target_mechanisms:
- target: Composite Intrinsic Capacity Decline
treatment_effect: INHIBITS
description: >-
Acts on the composite by routing each detected domain impairment to a
domain-specific intervention, rather than by any single mechanism of its own.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38251736
reference_title: 'Implementation and impact of the World Health Organization integrated care for older people (ICOPE) program in China: a randomised controlled trial.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
All outcomes showed improvements after a 6-month intervention, while statistically significant least-squares mean differences (control-intervention) in vitality (Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form to measure vitality, -0.21, 95% CI, -0.40-0.02), mobility (Short Physical Performance Battery to measure mobility, -0.29, 95% CI, -0.44-0.14) and psychological health (Geriatric Depression Scale five items to measure psychological health, 0.09, 95% CI, 0.03-0.14) were observed (P < 0.05).
explanation: >-
The randomised effect of the pathway itself on three of the five domains, in 938
propensity-matched participants.
- name: Hearing Intervention with Hearing Aid Provision
action_category: THERAPEUTIC
therapeutic_modality: DEVICE
description: >-
Audiological needs assessment, fitting of hearing devices, and counselling. It
addresses the sensory domain directly. It does not, on the best available
randomised evidence, slow cognitive decline in the general population of older
adults with hearing loss - the ACHIEVE primary result was null - so the
observational sensory-to-cognitive link is not a basis for prescribing it as a
cognitive intervention.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: hearing device fitting and audiological rehabilitation
term:
id: NCIT:C15315
label: Rehabilitation
qualifiers:
- predicate:
preferred_term: medical device
term:
id: NCIT:C16830
label: Medical Device
value:
preferred_term: hearing aid
term:
id: NCIT:C183182
label: Hearing Aid
target_mechanisms:
- target: Sensory Capacity Decline
treatment_effect: RESTORES
description: >-
Restores audibility, which is the measured content of the hearing half of the
sensory domain.
- target: Cognitive Capacity Decline
treatment_effect: MODULATES
description: >-
Proposed but not demonstrated. The randomised test of this edge was null overall,
with a benefit confined to a prespecified higher-risk subgroup, so the edge is
recorded as unresolved rather than as a therapeutic effect.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37478886
reference_title: 'Hearing intervention versus health education control to reduce cognitive decline in older adults with hearing loss in the USA (ACHIEVE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.'
supports: REFUTE
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
In the primary analysis combining the ARIC and de novo cohorts, 3-year cognitive change (in SD units) was not significantly different between the hearing intervention and health education control groups
explanation: >-
Refutes the claim that hearing intervention slows cognitive decline in this
population; it does not bear on the intervention's effect within the sensory
domain, which was not the trial's outcome.
- reference: PMID:37478886
reference_title: 'Hearing intervention versus health education control to reduce cognitive decline in older adults with hearing loss in the USA (ACHIEVE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.'
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
However, a prespecified sensitivity analysis showed a significant difference in the effect of the hearing intervention on 3-year cognitive change between the ARIC and de novo cohorts (pinteraction=0·010).
explanation: >-
Supports the narrower claim that the effect may exist in a higher-risk subgroup.
Marked INDIRECT because it is a subgroup interaction, not the trial's answer.
- name: Systematic ICOPE Step 1 Screening in Primary Care
action_category: SCREENING
description: >-
Population screening of adults aged 60 and over with the ICOPE Step 1 instrument,
by health-care providers or self-assessment through digital tools. Listed as a
non-therapeutic action: it changes nothing by itself, but it is the entry point to
everything else in this section, and the feasibility of doing it at scale was the
open question that the Occitania implementation answered.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: screening for decline in intrinsic capacity
term:
id: NCIT:C15419
label: Disease Screening
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36098317
reference_title: 'Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The high number of participants included in our study, as well as the high rates of follow-up, provides evidence to suggest that the large-scale implementation of ICOPE in clinical practice is feasible.
explanation: >-
Establishes feasibility at a scale of 10 903 people with 70.4% six-month
follow-up, which is the claim this action rests on.
- reference: PMID:36098317
reference_title: 'Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Most recommendations in step 3 (care plan) were related to locomotion, vitality, and cognition.
explanation: >-
Records which domains screening actually routes people into care for, which is
the practical output of the screen.
diagnosis:
- name: WHO ICOPE two-step assessment
description: >-
Assessment runs in two steps. Step 1 is the short screen modelled in `definitions`
and `treatments`; Step 2 is the in-depth assessment applied to whoever screens
positive, using the reference instruments for each domain - Mini-Mental State
Examination for cognition, Mini Nutritional Assessment for vitality, Short Physical
Performance Battery for locomotion, PHQ-9 for the psychological domain, and
clinical assessment for vision. Step 2 is what "impairment" means in this entry's
phenotype frequencies; Step 1 alone over-calls, as this entry's prevalence records
show.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:36809987
reference_title: 'Identification of decreased intrinsic capacity: Performance of diagnostic measures of the ICOPE Screening tool in community dwelling older people in the VIMCI study.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
IC assessment proposed by the WHO ICOPE guidelines is composed by two steps: First, Screening for decreased IC by the ICOPE Screening tool; second, by the reference standard methods.
explanation: >-
States the two-step structure that this diagnosis record encodes.
- reference: PMID:38676323
reference_title: 'Predictive Capacity of the Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments: Results From the INSPIRE-T Cohort.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Responses at screening were compared to results of the subsequent in-depth assessment (ie, Mini-Mental State Examination, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Short Physical Performance Battery, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and clinical investigation of vision problems)
explanation: >-
Names the Step 2 reference instruments, one per domain.
animal_models:
- name: Naturally ageing mouse frailty index
species: Mouse
genotype: C57BL/6 wild type, naturally aged
publication: PMID:24336799
description: >-
A deficit-accumulation index scored in naturally aged mice, built to match the
human clinical criteria of weakness, slow walking speed, low activity and poor
endurance. It is the closest available preclinical instrument for whole-organism
functional reserve, and it is what geroscience intervention studies score when they
claim an effect on function rather than on lifespan.
notes: >-
This is a frailty instrument, not an intrinsic-capacity instrument. No validated
rodent measure of intrinsic capacity as WHO defines it exists, which is why the
link below is PARTIALLY_RECAPITULATES and attaches at the reserve node rather than
at the composite construct.
modeled_mechanisms:
- target: Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ Systems
relationship: PARTIALLY_RECAPITULATES
fidelity: MODERATE
description: >-
Captures whole-organism functional reserve loss with age, at a prevalence
comparable to humans of matched survival age.
limitations: >-
Measures frailty by deficit accumulation rather than capacity, and covers only
the physical domains. The psychological and sensory domains of intrinsic
capacity have no counterpart in this index, and the cognitive domain is not
scored at all - so three of the entry's five domains are outside what this model
can address.
readouts:
- name: Frailty Index score from grip strength, walking speed, activity and endurance
target: Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ Systems
direction: INCREASED
interpretation: >-
A higher index means more accumulated deficits, that is, less reserve.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:24336799
reference_title: Clinically relevant frailty index for mice.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: >-
The selected criteria included grip strength, walking speed, physical activity, and endurance.
explanation: >-
Names the four measurements that make up this readout.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:24336799
reference_title: Clinically relevant frailty index for mice.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: >-
This prevalence of 9% frailty is consistent with the prevalence of frailty in humans at the same survival age.
explanation: >-
The comparability argument that makes this model informative for the human
reserve node rather than merely analogous.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:28463656
reference_title: Implementation of the mouse frailty index.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: >-
The recent development of an FI in naturally ageing mice provides an opportunity to conduct frailty research in a validated preclinical model.
explanation: >-
Establishes the index as a validated preclinical tool rather than a single-lab
construct.
- reference: PMID:28463656
reference_title: Implementation of the mouse frailty index.
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: >-
however, there are some factors that should be considered in implementing this tool
explanation: >-
Flags the inter-rater and environmental sensitivity of the index, which is why
fidelity is recorded as MODERATE rather than HIGH.
clinical_trials:
- name: NCT02582138
phase: NOT_APPLICABLE
status: COMPLETED
description: >-
SPRINTT - a multicomponent physical activity, nutritional counselling and
ICT-supported intervention versus healthy-ageing education, in 1519
community-dwelling people aged 70 and over with physical frailty and sarcopenia,
across 16 sites in 11 European countries.
target_phenotypes:
- preferred_term: Reduced muscle strength on chair-rise testing
term:
id: HP:0001324
label: Muscle weakness
- preferred_term: Slowed gait and impaired balance
term:
id: HP:0001288
label: Gait disturbance
evidence:
- reference: clinicaltrials:NCT02582138
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The SPRINTT study will evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent intervention programme (physical activity, nutritional counselling/dietary intervention, and information and communications technology intervention) compared with a healthy aging lifestyle education programme on mobility disability, in non-disabled older people with physical frailty and sarcopenia.
explanation: >-
The registration record for the trial behind this entry's principal locomotor
treatment.
- name: NCT03243422
phase: NOT_APPLICABLE
status: COMPLETED
description: >-
ACHIEVE - hearing intervention versus health education in 977 adults aged 70-84
with untreated hearing loss, nested within the ARIC cohort infrastructure, with
three-year global cognition as the primary endpoint.
target_phenotypes:
- preferred_term: Age-related hearing impairment
term:
id: HP:0000365
label: Hearing impairment
- preferred_term: Cognitive impairment short of dementia
term:
id: HP:0100543
label: Cognitive impairment
evidence:
- reference: clinicaltrials:NCT03243422
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
We plan to enroll 850 70-84 year-old cognitively normal older adults with hearing loss, who will be randomized 1:1 to the hearing intervention (hearing needs assessment, fitting of hearing devices, education/counseling) or successful aging health education intervention (individual sessions with a health educator covering healthy aging topics).
explanation: >-
The registration record for the only randomised test of the sensory-to-cognitive
edge in this entry.
- name: NCT01041989
phase: NOT_APPLICABLE
status: COMPLETED
description: >-
FINGER - a two-year multidomain intervention of nutritional guidance, exercise,
cognitive training, social activity and vascular risk management in 1260 people
aged 60-77 at elevated dementia risk.
target_phenotypes:
- preferred_term: Cognitive impairment short of dementia
term:
id: HP:0100543
label: Cognitive impairment
evidence:
- reference: clinicaltrials:NCT01041989
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The 2-year multi-domain life-style intervention includes nutritional guidance, exercise, cognitive training, increased social activity, and intensive monitoring and management of metabolic and vascular risk factors.
explanation: >-
The registration record describing the multidomain package this entry cites for
the cognitive domain.
- name: NCT00672685
phase: PHASE_III
status: COMPLETED
description: >-
MAPT - omega-3 supplementation, a multidomain intervention, or both, in
community-dwelling older adults. Its cohort is the source of this entry's
biomarker-to-trajectory evidence, so the trial appears here both as an
intervention study and as the platform behind the biochemical section.
target_phenotypes:
- preferred_term: Cognitive impairment short of dementia
term:
id: HP:0100543
label: Cognitive impairment
evidence:
- reference: clinicaltrials:NCT00672685
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The main objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of isolated supplementation with omega-3 fatty acid, an isolated multi-domain intervention
explanation: >-
The registration record for the trial whose cohort supplies this entry's plasma
biomarker evidence.
- name: NCT04224038
phase: NOT_APPLICABLE
status: RECRUITING
description: >-
INSPIRE-T - a ten-year observational bio-resource platform recruiting from age 30
upward with no upper age limit, across the full range of functional capacity,
built specifically to identify markers of ageing and of intrinsic-capacity
evolution. It is the source of this entry's pain and ICOPE-tool-validation
evidence.
evidence:
- reference: clinicaltrials:NCT04224038
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
the main objective of Inspire Bio-resource Research Platform for Healthy Aging is to build a comprehensive research platform gathering biological, clinical (including imaging) and digital resources that will be explored to identify robust (set of) markers of aging, age-related diseases and IC evolution.
explanation: >-
The registration record establishing that this platform's stated purpose is
exactly the biomarker-to-capacity question this entry leaves open.
discussions:
- discussion_id: gap_ic_hallmark_causality
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
status: OPEN
prompt: >-
Do the hallmarks of ageing cause the decline in measured intrinsic capacity, or
do the two merely track a common clock?
attaches_to:
- pathophysiology#Accumulation of Hallmark Ageing Damage
- pathophysiology#Loss of Physiological Reserve Across Organ Systems
rationale: >-
This entry's upstream chain is assembled from geroscience literature that was not
written about intrinsic capacity, and the human evidence joining the two is
associative. The strongest link available is that plasma markers of inflammation
and mitochondrial stress separate multi-impaired from high-stable capacity
trajectories in 1271 people - which is consistent with causation and equally
consistent with both being downstream of the same ageing process. No human study
has shown that reducing a hallmark burden raises measured intrinsic capacity. The
gap matters practically, because it is exactly the assumption that geroscience
intervention programmes make when they adopt intrinsic capacity as an early
endpoint in place of decades-long disease outcomes.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37620614
reference_title: Association between aging-related biomarkers and longitudinal trajectories of intrinsic capacity in older adults.
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
Intrinsic capacity (IC), the composite of physical and mental capacities, declines with age at different rates and patterns between individuals.
explanation: >-
Frames the between-person variation that the hallmark-causality question would
have to explain, from the study that supplies the best current link.
- reference: PMID:34883201
reference_title: A gerophysiology perspective on healthy ageing.
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
to date, there has been very limited analysis to guide scientists or physicians on how to practically apply the intrinsic capacity (IC) and reserve concepts so that they can inform the development of effective interventions
explanation: >-
The review that proposes joining geroscience to the WHO framework states the gap
in its own terms.
- discussion_id: controversy_icope_screening_tool_structure
kind: CONTROVERSY
status: OPEN
prompt: >-
Is the ICOPE Step 1 screening tool a valid measure of intrinsic capacity, or a
useful triage instrument whose composite score should not be used as a measure at
all?
attaches_to:
- definitions#WHO ICOPE Step 1 screening for decline in intrinsic capacity
rationale: >-
Two well-conducted validation studies reach compatible numbers and incompatible
conclusions. In INSPIRE-T the tool identified domain impairments with high
specificity and acceptable sensitivity, and the authors recommend it as a low-cost
screen. In the Toledo Study of Healthy Ageing the cognitive items did not associate
with age, education, or dependence as the measurement model requires, vision and
hearing did not form one sensory factor, and the composite added nothing over the
individual domains for predicting dependence or hospitalisation. The disagreement
is not about the data but about what the instrument is for: a triage screen may be
fit for purpose while failing as a measurement model, and the literature routinely
uses the composite as though it were the latter.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:37960903
reference_title: 'The icope Intrinsic Capacity Screening Tool: Measurement Structure and Predictive Validity of Dependence and Hospitalization.'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The IST included as a composite in a model with the individual domains showed no statistically significant associations with any of the outcomes
explanation: >-
The finding that the composite adds nothing over its components, which is the
substance of the disagreement.
- reference: PMID:38676323
reference_title: 'Predictive Capacity of the Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments: Results From the INSPIRE-T Cohort.'
supports: REFUTE
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: >-
The ICOPE screening tool can be a useful instrument enabling the identification of older people with impairments in IC domains, but studies with different populations are needed.
explanation: >-
The opposing position, stated with its own caveat about generalisability.
- discussion_id: gap_ic_no_mondo_class
kind: CURATION_TODO
status: OPEN
prompt: >-
Should a MONDO class be requested for ageing associated decline in intrinsic
capacity, so this entry can carry a disease_term?
attaches_to:
- disease#Ageing Associated Decline in Intrinsic Capacity
rationale: >-
MONDO carries no class for intrinsic capacity or its decline, so this entry is
anchored only on the ICD-11 Foundation entity. That is workable but it leaves the
entry outside every MONDO-keyed query, grouping, and coverage report in this
repository, and it means the concept cannot be related to neighbouring MONDO
classes such as sarcopenia or frailty by ontology. Against requesting one: MG2A is
classified by WHO under symptoms and clinical findings rather than as a disease,
and this project does not mint terms, so the request would have to be made to
MONDO with an argument about whether a functional-reserve construct belongs in a
disease ontology at all. The decision is recorded here rather than taken.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:26520231
reference_title: 'The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing.'
supports: SUPPORT
directness: INDIRECT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: >-
The report is built around a redefinition of healthy ageing that centres on the notion of functional ability
explanation: >-
The framing that makes the ontological question live: the construct is defined
against function rather than against pathology, which is why it has no natural
home in a disease ontology.
references:
- reference: PMID:26520231
title: 'The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing.'
- reference: PMID:29408961
title: Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity.
- reference: PMID:31678933
title: The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing.
- reference: PMID:36356628
title: WHO working definition of vitality capacity for healthy longevity monitoring.
- reference: PMID:36098317
title: 'Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study.'
Overview. Intrinsic capacity (IC) is a construct introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "the composite of all physical and mental capacities that a person can draw on... including their biological reserve" (WHO ICOPE framework). IC is one of the two pillars (alongside the environment) that determine an older person's functional ability in WHO's healthy-ageing model. "Ageing-associated decline in intrinsic capacity" (AADIC) is the clinical entity denoting the age-related, progressive attrition of this composite reserve — a graded, largely subclinical process that precedes and predicts frailty, disability, and death rather than a single-organ disease.
IC is operationalized across five domains: locomotion (balance, gait, muscle strength), vitality (the balance between energy production and consumption — considered an "overarching" domain reflecting underlying biological reserve), cognition (memory, intelligence, problem-solving), psychological (mood, sociability), and sensory function (hearing, vision) (PubMed scoping review, 2022; ScienceDirect vitality review, 2025).
Key identifiers:
- ICD-11: MG2A — "Ageing associated decline in intrinsic capacity," under General Symptoms/Signs, which replaced the older, non-clinical "old age" designation (findacode.com; Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2022).
- WHO framework: Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), published 2017–2019, operationalizing IC screening, assessment and management (PMC9819593).
- MONDO/OMIM/Orphanet do not carry dedicated single-gene entries for this construct (it is a geroscience/functional syndrome rather than a Mendelian disease); MONDO indexing, where present, typically cross-references the ICD-11 MG2A code.
Synonyms/alternative names: age-related decline in intrinsic capacity; loss of intrinsic capacity; IC decline; (informally, and imprecisely) "biological ageing decline" — distinct from frailty and disability, discussed in §9 below.
Data provenance. Most evidence is derived from aggregated cohort/population-level resources — large longitudinal ageing cohorts (UK Biobank, Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging [CLSA], English Longitudinal Study of Ageing [ELSA], China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study [CHARLS], I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study, 10/66 Dementia Research Group cohorts, MAPT study) and WHO ICOPE pilot/implementation studies — rather than individual EHR case reports, since IC is fundamentally a population health/geroscience screening construct.
Disease causal factors. AADIC is not caused by a single lesion but by the cumulative, multisystem action of the fundamental "hallmarks of aging" (genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, altered intercellular communication, chronic inflammation, and dysbiosis), which erode reserve capacity across the five IC domains in parallel (Frontiers, hallmarks-of-aging framework, 2024; PMC12259695, "Targeting the hallmarks of aging," 2024).
A 2025 genome-wide association study (GWAS; UK Biobank n=44,631 and CLSA n=13,085; total 57,716) found: - SNP-based heritability of IC: 25.2% (95% CI 23.2–27.2%) in UK Biobank, 19.5% (95% CI 14.2–24.8%) in CLSA. - 38 independent SNPs across 10 novel genomic loci, mapping ~4,289 candidate SNPs to 197 genes. - Lead signal: rs9891103 near MAPT (p = 6.50×10⁻¹⁴). - Other implicated genes: PTP4A2, PRPF3, LCORL, RN7SL89P, ANAPC10, HK1, DLEU1, SCN4A, STAU1. - Implicated pathways: cell cycle/proliferation, apoptosis and cellular senescence, synaptic vesicle trafficking/neuronal plasticity, glucose metabolism/energy production, immune/inflammatory signaling, ubiquitin-proteasome pathway — with tissue enrichment in muscle, brain, heart, adipose, and nerve, matching the five IC domains (PMC12510315; medRxiv preprint). - APOE genotype and polygenic risk score for dementia interact with baseline IC to modify dementia risk in a UK Biobank prospective cohort (Neurology, 2024, PMID 38843484). - IC assessed via 4 domains combined with genetic risk predicts incident Parkinson disease (Neurology, 2024).
Higher baseline physical activity, social engagement, favorable living environment, and (per the multi-domain intervention trials in §12) structured exercise/nutrition/cognitive-training programs slow or partially reverse IC decline, particularly in pre-frail individuals with lower baseline IC (TIGER trial).
The interaction of polygenic dementia risk with IC trajectory (UK Biobank) is the clearest documented G×E-type interaction: genetically high-risk individuals with declining IC show amplified dementia incidence, suggesting IC decline unmasks or accelerates latent genetic risk rather than acting purely additively (PMID 38843484).
IC decline manifests as a constellation of graded (not binary) functional impairments across the five domains, captured operationally by the WHO ICOPE Screening Tool (six practical sub-domains: locomotion, vitality/nutrition, vision, hearing, cognition, psychological/depressive symptoms) (PMC9945724).
| Domain | Representative phenotype | Suggested HPO term | Measurement/cutoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locomotion | Reduced gait speed | HP:0002136 (Gait disturbance) / HP:0031936 (Slow walking) | <1.0 m/s on 6-meter timed walk |
| Locomotion | Impaired sit-to-stand / muscle weakness | HP:0001324 (Muscle weakness) | Unable to complete 5 chair rises in 14 s |
| Vitality | Unintentional weight loss | HP:0001824 (Weight loss) | Self-reported weight/appetite loss |
| Vitality | Fatigue | HP:0012378 (Fatigue) | Self-report fatigue scales |
| Cognition | Memory impairment | HP:0002354 (Memory impairment) | Failure on 3-word recall |
| Cognition | Disorientation | HP:0031466 (disorientation-related) | Incorrect time/space orientation |
| Psychological | Depressive symptoms | HP:0000716 (Depressivity) | Geriatric Depression Scale items |
| Sensory | Hearing loss | HP:0000365 (Hearing impairment) | Whisper test/audiometry |
| Sensory | Visual impairment | HP:0000505 (Visual impairment) | Self-report/near-vision testing |
Onset/severity/progression. Onset is insidious, beginning well before old age in some domains but clinically salient from the 60s–70s; severity is graded and multidimensional (each domain can decline independently); progression is generally gradual but accelerates near end of life — "the magnitude of the inverse association between intrinsic capacity and disability increased as death approached" (Lancet Healthy Longevity, "dynamic relationship"). A 20-year national longitudinal cohort study describes multiple distinct IC decline trajectories rather than one uniform slope (PMC11567246).
Frequency. Pooled meta-analytic prevalence of decreased IC in community-dwelling older adults: 67.8% (15 studies, n=33,070) in a 2024 meta-analysis (PMID 39088112); an earlier 2023 meta-analysis reported a 76.1% detection rate (PMID 37543528) — variability reflects different screening cutoffs/tools across studies.
Quality of life impact. IC decline is associated with reduced functional independence, increased hospitalization/institutionalization risk, and lower quality-of-life scores; the vitality domain in particular correlates with fatigue-driven QoL reduction.
Suggested ontology terms: GO:0007568 (aging), GO:0090398 (cellular senescence), GO:0006915 (apoptotic process), GO:0005739 (mitochondrion, GO cellular component), GO:0006914 (autophagy).
Where a step is inferred rather than directly demonstrated for IC as a specific construct (vs. general geroscience), this is noted above (steps 1 and the sensory→cognitive feedback loop) — most of the literature about the general hallmarks-of-aging cascade is generic rather than IC-domain-specific, and the "Biological Rationale for Integrating Intrinsic Capacity Into Frailty Models" review (PMC11890019, not independently readable in this session but summarized in secondary sources) argues IC operationalizes exactly this geroscience cascade clinically.
Suggested GO terms: GO:0007568 (aging), GO:0090398 (cellular senescence), GO:0006954 (inflammatory response), GO:0005739 (mitochondrion), GO:0055114 (oxidation-reduction process). CL terms: CL:0000188 (skeletal muscle myoblast/fiber-related), CL:0000540 (neuron), CL:0000738 (leukocyte, for inflammaging). UBERON: UBERON:0001134 (skeletal muscle tissue), UBERON:0000955 (brain), UBERON:0001846 (columella - inner ear structures, for hearing), UBERON:0000970 (eye).
Epidemiology: - Pooled prevalence of decreased IC among community-dwelling older adults: 67.8% (2024 meta-analysis, 15 studies, n=33,070; PMID 39088112); earlier estimate 76.1% detection rate (PMID 37543528). Estimates vary substantially by screening tool, cutoff, and setting (community vs. inpatient).
Genetic architecture (not classical Mendelian inheritance — complex/polygenic trait): - SNP-heritability ~19.5–25.2% (§2/§4). - No described penetrance/expressivity framework applies (not a single-gene disorder); genetic anticipation, germline mosaicism, and founder effects are not applicable constructs here. - Consanguinity role: not established/applicable. - Carrier frequency: not applicable (polygenic risk, not carrier state).
Population demographics: - Affected populations: all ageing populations globally; the WHO ICOPE framework has been piloted and adopted in diverse settings including China, Singapore, and Latin America/India/China (10/66 cohorts). - Sex: some studies report higher IC decline burden associated with female sex, though this varies by domain and cohort. - Age distribution: prevalence and severity increase monotonically with chronological age; the construct is specifically defined for older adults (typically ≥60 years in WHO framework), though sub-clinical decline is measurable earlier.
Relationship to frailty and disability (conceptual distinction). IC, frailty, and disability are related but distinct constructs:
"Frailty and IC are complementary, with frailty highlighting the need for specialised care in complex cases, whereas IC supports early intervention and prevention across broader populations" (PMC6591451, "Frailty and Intrinsic Capacity: Two Distinct but Related Constructs," PMID 31275941).
IC operates at the level of an individual's underlying physical/mental reserve; frailty is the clinical syndrome of accentuated vulnerability arising when that reserve is depleted; disability is the downstream functional/environmental-interaction outcome. Declines in IC frequently precede frailty and disability onset, supporting IC's role as an earlier, more modifiable target for prevention (PMC9819593; PMC10737867).
WHO ICOPE Screening Tool (the primary standardized instrument) assesses six practical sub-domains:
| Sub-domain | Screening method |
|---|---|
| Locomotion | 5 chair-rises in ≤14 seconds test; 6-meter timed walk (<1.0 m/s indicates impairment) |
| Cognition | Time/space orientation questions + 3-word recall |
| Vitality/nutrition | Self-reported weight loss and appetite loss |
| Vision | Self-reported visual difficulty / near-vision testing |
| Hearing | Whisper test / self-report |
| Psychological | Depressive symptom screening (e.g., mood questions) |
The tool's sensitivity/specificity performance has been evaluated in multiple validation studies, including the VIMCI study (PMC9945724) and a scoping review of sensitivity/specificity across settings (ScienceDirect).
Laboratory/biomarker tests (research/emerging): - Inflammatory panel: IL-6, CRP, TNF-α (candidate, not yet clinically validated for IC-specific staging). - Mitochondrial-function biomarker: plasma IF1 (research use, MAPT cohort). - Vitality/energy-metabolism biomarkers: IGF-1, DHEA, hemoglobin. - Epigenetic/omics: blood-based DNA-methylation "IC clock" — a research-stage but promising quantitative composite biomarker correlating with mortality risk (Nature Aging, 2025).
Genetic testing: Not part of routine clinical diagnosis; GWAS-derived polygenic risk scores (for IC itself, or for correlated outcomes like dementia via APOE/PRS) remain research tools.
Differential diagnosis / distinguishing considerations: Distinguish IC decline from (a) frailty (a downstream clinical syndrome), (b) disability (functional/environmental outcome), and (c) single-organ disease processes that can mimic domain-specific IC decline (e.g., major depressive disorder mimicking the psychological domain, primary sarcopenia versus disuse atrophy, age-related macular degeneration versus other visual pathology) — the ICOPE approach is explicitly a screening/triage tool, not a diagnostic replacement for organ-specific workup.
Screening context: The WHO ICOPE program is structured in five phases: (1) screening for IC decline, (2) in-depth assessment, (3) person-centered care planning, (4) referral, and (5) monitoring; it issues 13 recommendations covering mobility loss, malnutrition, visual/hearing impairment, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms, plus modules on urinary incontinence, falls risk, and caregiver support (PMC9819593; WHO ICOPE Module 7).
IC is a robust, graded predictor of adverse outcomes:
IC decline is managed through multidomain, person-centered prevention/rehabilitation rather than pharmacotherapy targeted at a single disease mechanism, consistent with its status as a functional-reserve construct rather than a discrete disease.
Multidomain lifestyle/behavioral interventions (NCIT:C181743 Behavioral Counseling / NCIT:C15302 Physical Therapy / NCIT:C15447 Dietary Intervention): - Combined exercise + cognitive stimulation therapy significantly improved IC composite score and locomotion, vitality, cognition, and psychological sub-scores in pre-frail older adults (PMC12275792, 2024). - TIGER trial (Taiwan, n=1,054): 12-month multidomain intervention (exercise, nutrition, cognitive/social engagement) significantly mitigated cognitive decline and physical frailty, with the largest benefit in those with the greatest baseline IC impairment (ScienceDirect). - ENHANCE RCT: 12-month group-based multidomain intervention (exercise, cognitive training, nutrition education) targeting brain structure/function (PMC12134766). - MIDA study (n=248, ages 60–85): multidomain cognitive training + exercise + nutritional guidance, 12-month follow-up (Tandfonline, 2025). - Multidomain lifestyle counseling RCT in older women showed improved IC (Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2025). - Smart-care platform–delivered multi-domain interventions are being tested in ongoing RCT protocols (BMC Geriatrics protocol). - A non-randomized controlled study found baseline IC itself (rather than intervention exposure) was the stronger predictor of reversal to robustness among prefrail adults, underscoring IC's role as both a target and a prognostic moderator of intervention response (PMID 36341237).
Domain-specific treatment (NCIT terms): - Locomotion/sarcopenia: resistance/endurance exercise (NCIT:C15302 Physical Therapy), nutritional protein supplementation, and — in emerging research — pharmacological agents targeting mitochondrial health, senolytics, and exerkines (PMC12531180). - Sensory: cataract surgery, hearing aid provision (device-based; per this repo's convention, bind the surgical/clinical action term, e.g., NCIT:C15329 Surgical Procedure, and capture the device via a qualifier). - Cognitive/psychological: cognitive stimulation therapy, behavioral counseling, social-engagement programs. - Vitality: dietary/nutritional intervention (NCIT:C15447), management of underlying inflammatory/metabolic drivers.
Experimental/advanced therapeutics: Senolytics, exerkines, and gene-therapy approaches targeting mitochondrial dysfunction are cited as emerging, largely pre-clinical/early-clinical strategies for the sarcopenia component of IC decline; no disease-modifying pharmacotherapy is yet approved specifically for "IC decline" as an indication.
Treatment outcomes: Multidomain interventions show consistent, modest-to-moderate improvement in IC composite and domain scores, with the strongest benefit in pre-frail (moderately impaired) individuals — reinforcing the "critical period" concept in §8. A 2024 Lancet Healthy Longevity commentary argues the field has established that "intrinsic capacity assessment works" and the priority now is translating assessment into scaled clinical/public-health action (Lancet Healthy Longevity commentary, 2024).
IC is increasingly being operationalized as a translational geroscience construct in non-human species:
| Category | Suggested terms |
|---|---|
| ICD-11 | MG2A (Ageing associated decline in intrinsic capacity) |
| HPO | HP:0002136 (Gait disturbance), HP:0001324 (Muscle weakness), HP:0001824 (Weight loss), HP:0012378 (Fatigue), HP:0002354 (Memory impairment), HP:0000716 (Depressivity), HP:0000365 (Hearing impairment), HP:0000505 (Visual impairment) |
| GO (Biological Process) | GO:0007568 (aging), GO:0090398 (cellular senescence), GO:0006954 (inflammatory response), GO:0006914 (autophagy), GO:0055114 (oxidation-reduction process) |
| GO (Cellular Component) | GO:0005739 (mitochondrion) |
| CL | CL:0000188 (skeletal myofiber-related), CL:0000540 (neuron), CL:0000738 (leukocyte) |
| UBERON | UBERON:0001134 (skeletal muscle tissue), UBERON:0000955 (brain), UBERON:0000970 (eye) |
| HGNC | MAPT (HGNC:6893), PTP4A2, PRPF3, LCORL, ANAPC10, HK1, DLEU1, SCN4A, STAU1 |
| NCIT (treatment) | NCIT:C15302 (Physical Therapy), NCIT:C15447 (Dietary Intervention), NCIT:C181743 (Behavioral Counseling), NCIT:C15329 (Surgical Procedure), NCIT:C15986 (Pharmacotherapy) |
Checked with linkml-reference-validator 0.2.1.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| References checked | 42 |
| Resolved | 42 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| Quoted claims checked | 3 |
| Quoted claims found in source | 0 |
| Quoted claims not found in source | 3 |
| References weighed for topical relevance | 42 |
| On topic | 19 |
| Off topic | 0 |
Searched the abstract, any retrieved full text, and the title. A quote drawn from a part of the paper that was not retrieved will appear here too, so check before treating one as invented:
1 of these was searched against an abstract alone, with no full text retrieved - marked abstract only below. Where full text can be fetched, re-running with it will settle them; where the source publishes only a summary to PubMed, as GeneReviews chapters do, it will not, and the quote has to be checked by hand against the chapter itself.
PMC:PMC9819593 (abstract only): "the composite of all physical and mental capacities that a person can draw on... including their biological reserve"PMID:31275941: "Frailty and IC are complementary, with frailty highlighting the need for specialised care in complex cases, whereas IC supports early intervention and prevention across broader populations"PMC:PMC6591451: "Frailty and IC are complementary, with frailty highlighting the need for specialised care in complex cases, whereas IC supports early intervention and prevention across broader populations"Checked with linkml-term-validator 0.4.5, through the ols: adapter.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| Terms checked | 31 |
| Resolved | 28 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Obsolete | 2 |
| Unverifiable | 1 |
| Terms whose name was checked | 24 |
| Terms named correctly | 13 |
| Terms named as a different term | 2 |
| Terms whose name is worth a second look | 9 |
These identifiers resolve, so nothing about them looks wrong, and the ontology calls them something unrelated to what the report calls them. That usually means the identifier is not the one the sentence needs:
HP:0031466 (1 mention) - the report calls it "disorientation-related"; HP calls it Impairment in personality functioningUBERON:0001846 (1 mention) - the report calls it "columella - inner ear structures, for hearing"; UBERON calls it internal earThese terms are real but deprecated. Citing one is not a fabrication; it does mean the report is naming something the ontology has retired:
GO:0007568 (obsolete aging) (3 mentions)GO:0055114 (obsolete oxidation-reduction process) (2 mentions)The report's name for these is recognisably related to the term's own name without being one of them. A loose paraphrase reads the same way as a citation of the wrong sibling term - and so does a related synonym, which the ontology records precisely because it names something adjacent rather than the same thing - so these are listed rather than judged:
HP:0000716 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "Depressivity"; HP calls it Depression, and lists "Depressivity" among its other namesGO:0007568 (3 mentions) - the report calls it "aging"; GO calls it obsolete aging, and lists "ageing" among its other namesGO:0090398 (4 mentions) - the report calls it "cellular senescence", "Cellular processes: cellular senescence"; GO calls it cellular senescence**GO:0005739 (4 mentions) - the report calls it "mitochondrion, GO cellular component", "mitochondrion"; GO calls it mitochondrionGO:0055114 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "oxidation-reduction process"; GO calls it obsolete oxidation-reduction processCL:0000188 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "skeletal muscle myoblast/fiber-related"; CL calls it cell of skeletal muscle, and lists "skeletal muscle cell" among its other namesCL:0000738 (2 mentions) - the report calls it "leukocyte, for inflammaging"; CL calls it leukocyteNCIT:C15447 (3 mentions) - the report calls it "Vitality: dietary/nutritional intervention"; NCIT calls it Dietary Intervention, and lists "Nutritional Interventions" among its other namesNCBITaxon:10090 (1 mention) - the report calls it "Mus musculus", "Taxonomy: *Mus musculus"; NCBITaxon calls it Mus musculus**The report gives these identifiers more than one name of its own:
GO:0090398 - called "cellular senescence", "Cellular processes:** cellular senescence"GO:0005739 - called "mitochondrion, GO cellular component", "mitochondrion"NCBITaxon:10090 - called "Mus musculus", "Taxonomy:* Mus musculus"