Acute alcohol sensitivity - the alcohol flushing response, colloquially "Asian flush" - is an inherited, exposure-conditioned disorder of acetaldehyde clearance. Ethanol is oxidised to acetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase and then to acetate by mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2). When ALDH2 activity is deficient, acetaldehyde accumulates after drinking and produces facial flushing, nausea and tachycardia within minutes. The mechanism is *dominant negative*, which is why a single copy suffices. ALDH2 functions as a tetramer, and a subunit encoded by the inactive allele poisons the tetramers it joins: in gastric biopsies, neither homozygotes nor heterozygotes showed any ALDH2 activity band on isoelectric focusing, so heterotetramers containing mutant subunits are inactive or nearly so. In an alcohol challenge, rs671 (p.Glu504Lys) heterozygotes reached a six-fold higher acetaldehyde level than wild-type carriers. Two framings in the standard account of this disorder are wrong, and this entry deliberately departs from both. First, **it is not only rs671.** A 2024 alcohol-challenge study identified two further ALDH2 variants - rs747096195 (p.Arg101Gly) and rs190764869 (p.Arg114Trp) - in flushing individuals who were not of East Asian descent, each roughly doubling acetaldehyde, by mechanisms that differ from rs671's: failure of functional dimer/tetramer formation for R101G, and reduced Vmax for both. Second, **it is not a benign curiosity.** Acetaldehyde is a genotoxin; the flushing response is a clinically usable biomarker of markedly elevated oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk from drinking, and Brooks and colleagues wrote their landmark paper specifically to tell clinicians that a question about past flushing episodes is a cancer risk assessment. The same allele that causes this disorder is *protective* against alcohol use disorder, because the reaction is aversive. The knowledge base already curates both downstream consequences - `Alcohol_Use_Disorder` names ALDH2 as a large-effect protective locus, and the oesophageal cancer entries name it as a risk factor - without curating the disorder that sits between them. This entry supplies that shared mechanism.
Ask a research question about Acute Alcohol Sensitivity. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
Conditions with similar clinical presentations that must be differentiated from Acute Alcohol Sensitivity:
name: Acute Alcohol Sensitivity
creation_date: "2026-08-22T16:00:00Z"
category: Genetic
description: >
Acute alcohol sensitivity - the alcohol flushing response, colloquially "Asian
flush" - is an inherited, exposure-conditioned disorder of acetaldehyde
clearance. Ethanol is oxidised to acetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase and
then to acetate by mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2). When ALDH2
activity is deficient, acetaldehyde accumulates after drinking and produces
facial flushing, nausea and tachycardia within minutes.
The mechanism is *dominant negative*, which is why a single copy suffices.
ALDH2 functions as a tetramer, and a subunit encoded by the inactive allele
poisons the tetramers it joins: in gastric biopsies, neither homozygotes nor
heterozygotes showed any ALDH2 activity band on isoelectric focusing, so
heterotetramers containing mutant subunits are inactive or nearly so. In an
alcohol challenge, rs671 (p.Glu504Lys) heterozygotes reached a six-fold
higher acetaldehyde level than wild-type carriers.
Two framings in the standard account of this disorder are wrong, and this
entry deliberately departs from both. First, **it is not only rs671.** A 2024
alcohol-challenge study identified two further ALDH2 variants - rs747096195
(p.Arg101Gly) and rs190764869 (p.Arg114Trp) - in flushing individuals who were
not of East Asian descent, each roughly doubling acetaldehyde, by mechanisms
that differ from rs671's: failure of functional dimer/tetramer formation for
R101G, and reduced Vmax for both. Second, **it is not a benign curiosity.**
Acetaldehyde is a genotoxin; the flushing response is a clinically usable
biomarker of markedly elevated oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk from
drinking, and Brooks and colleagues wrote their landmark paper specifically to
tell clinicians that a question about past flushing episodes is a cancer risk
assessment.
The same allele that causes this disorder is *protective* against alcohol use
disorder, because the reaction is aversive. The knowledge base already curates
both downstream consequences - `Alcohol_Use_Disorder` names ALDH2 as a
large-effect protective locus, and the oesophageal cancer entries name it as a
risk factor - without curating the disorder that sits between them. This entry
supplies that shared mechanism.
disease_term:
preferred_term: acute alcohol sensitivity
term:
id: MONDO:0012454
label: alcohol sensitivity, acute
parents:
- inborn error of metabolism
classifications:
harrisons_chapter:
- classification_value: GENETICS_ENVIRONMENT_DISEASE
references:
- reference: PMID:19320537
title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
- reference: PMID:39075523
title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
external_assertions:
- name: OMIM acute alcohol sensitivity
source: OMIM
assertion_type: disease_record
external_id: OMIM:610251
description: OMIM entry for alcohol sensitivity, acute (ALDH2-related).
inheritance:
- name: Autosomal dominant
inheritance_term:
preferred_term: Autosomal dominant inheritance
term:
id: HP:0000006
label: Autosomal dominant inheritance
description: >-
A single inactive ALDH2 allele produces the phenotype, because the mutant
subunit inactivates the tetramers it is incorporated into rather than merely
contributing nothing. Homozygotes are more severely affected than
heterozygotes, so the trait is dominant but not fully so at the quantitative
level - a gene-dosage gradient sits on top of the dominant-negative effect.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:8290656
reference_title: "Dominance of the mutant ALDH2(2) allele in the expression of human stomach aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 activity."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Our results support the notion that the mutant allele is dominant and that the heterotetrameric ALDH2 molecules containing the mutant subunits are enzymatically inactive or far less active."
explanation: >-
States both the dominance and its structural basis in one sentence.
pathophysiology:
- name: Inactivating ALDH2 Variant
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
description: >-
A heterozygous or homozygous variant reducing ALDH2 catalytic capacity. The
dominant allele worldwide is rs671 (p.Glu504Lys, historically written E487K
in mature-protein numbering); rs747096195 (p.Arg101Gly) and rs190764869
(p.Arg114Trp) are further variants identified in flushing individuals of
non-East-Asian descent.
genetic_context:
allele_type: SNV
variant_origin: GERMLINE
functional_impact_category: DOMINANT_NEGATIVE
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "In East Asian descendants, an inactive genetic variant in ALDH2, rs671, triggers an alcohol flushing response due to acetaldehyde accumulation."
explanation: >-
Names the canonical variant and the causal chain in one sentence.
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "We identified two additional ALDH2 variants in humans causing facial flushing and acetaldehyde accumulation after alcohol consumption."
explanation: >-
Establishes that the allelic basis is broader than rs671, which is why
this node is named for the class of variant rather than for rs671.
downstream:
- target: Loss of Tetrameric ALDH2 Catalytic Activity
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
The variant subunit inactivates the tetramer. The route differs by allele:
rs671 subunits assemble but the resulting heterotetramers are inactive,
whereas p.Arg101Gly fails to form functional dimers/tetramers at all and
p.Arg114Trp reduces Vmax.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:8290656
reference_title: "Dominance of the mutant ALDH2(2) allele in the expression of human stomach aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 activity."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "None of the subjects with the mutant homozygotic and the heterozygotic genotypes exhibited the ALDH2 activity band or intermediate bands between ALDH2 and ALDH1 on isoelectric focusing gels."
explanation: >-
The observation behind the dominant-negative conclusion: heterozygotes
show no residual activity band, not a half-height one.
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "The effect is caused by a lack of functional dimer/tetramer formation for R101G and decreased Vmax for both R101G and R114W."
explanation: >-
Distinguishes the assembly-failure and kinetic routes of the two newer
variants from the rs671 poisoned-tetramer route.
- name: Loss of Tetrameric ALDH2 Catalytic Activity
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
description: >-
The mitochondrial low-Km aldehyde dehydrogenase that oxidises acetaldehyde
to acetate loses activity. Because ALDH2 is the low-Km enzyme, it is what
normally keeps circulating acetaldehyde near zero during drinking, and there
is no redundant activity that substitutes at physiological concentrations.
No GO annotation for tetramer assembly is attached to this node, and the
omission is deliberate: assembly behaves *oppositely* across the alleles
that reach this node. The dominant rs671 subunit assembles normally and
poisons the tetramer it joins - that is precisely what "dominant negative"
means here, and annotating decreased homotetramerization would state the
opposite. p.Arg101Gly, by contrast, does show a lack of functional
dimer/tetramer formation. A single-valued modifier cannot carry both, so
the distinction is stated here and in the two downstream evidence items
rather than flattened into one wrong annotation.
molecular_functions:
- preferred_term: aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0004029
label: aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: ethanol catabolic process
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0006068
label: ethanol catabolic process
evidence:
- reference: PMID:8290656
reference_title: "Dominance of the mutant ALDH2(2) allele in the expression of human stomach aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 activity."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "About half of Chinese individuals lack mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) activity, which is responsible for the oxidation of acetaldehyde produced during ethanol metabolism."
explanation: >-
Names the enzyme, its substrate, and the scale of the deficiency in the
population where it was characterised.
downstream:
- target: Acetaldehyde Accumulation After Ethanol Exposure
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
With the clearing enzyme disabled, acetaldehyde produced from ethanol
accumulates instead of being oxidised onward to acetate.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Humans heterozygous for rs747096195 (R101G) or rs190764869 (R114W) had facial flushing and a 2-fold increase in acetaldehyde levels, while rs671 (E504K) had facial flushing and a 6-fold increase in acetaldehyde levels relative to wild type ALDH2 carriers."
explanation: >-
Direct measurement of acetaldehyde after a controlled alcohol challenge,
quantified per genotype - the strongest single piece of evidence in this
entry.
- name: Ethanol Oxidation to Acetaldehyde by Alcohol Dehydrogenase
biological_scale: MOLECULAR
description: >-
Ingested ethanol is oxidised to acetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase before
ALDH2 has anything to clear. This node exists because acetaldehyde exposure
is set by the *ratio* of two enzyme steps, not by ALDH2 alone: the
fast-metabolizing ADH1B*2 allele raises the production rate, and the
slow-metabolizing ADH1B*1/*1 genotype lowers it. That is why ADH1B genotype
modifies risk on top of ALDH2, and why the combination is far more
informative than either alone.
molecular_functions:
- preferred_term: alcohol dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity
term:
id: GO:0004022
label: alcohol dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "Ethanol is first metabolized primarily by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) into acetaldehyde (Figure 2), a mutagen and animal carcinogen that causes DNA damage and has other cancer-promoting effects"
explanation: >-
States this node's claim exactly - the ADH-catalysed step - and names
acetaldehyde's genotoxicity in the same sentence. Tagged OTHER because the
source is a review article stating established biochemistry rather than
reporting a study of its own.
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: "It should be noted that ADH is also polymorphic, and genetic variants in ADH1B interact with the ALDH2 variant to modify risk"
explanation: >-
The interaction claim that justifies curating ADH1B as a modifier and
giving this production step its own node.
downstream:
- target: Acetaldehyde Accumulation After Ethanol Exposure
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Acetaldehyde produced here is what accumulates when ALDH2 cannot clear
it. The two-enzyme balance is why ADH1B genotype modifies the phenotype.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30629674
reference_title: "Endoscopic screening using esophageal iodine staining and genotypes of ADH1B and ALDH2 in Japanese alcohol-dependent women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The combination of ADH1B*1/*1 and ALDH2*1/*2 markedly increased the risk of esophageal DIULs ≥5 mm (39.3 [10.6-146])."
explanation: >-
The clearest demonstration that the two steps combine: the joint
genotype carries a far larger odds ratio than either alone.
- name: Acetaldehyde Accumulation After Ethanol Exposure
biological_scale: ORGANISM
description: >-
Systemic acetaldehyde rises after drinking. This node is the hinge of the
entry: everything upstream is constitutive genetics, everything downstream
requires an ethanol exposure to have occurred. A carrier who never drinks
has the genotype and none of the phenotype.
chemical_entities:
- preferred_term: acetaldehyde
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: CHEBI:15343
label: acetaldehyde
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "human subjects were given an alcohol challenge (0.25 g/kg) while quantifying acetaldehyde levels and the physiological response (heart rate and skin temperature) to alcohol"
explanation: >-
Establishes that the accumulation is measured under a defined exposure,
which is what makes this node exposure-conditioned rather than
constitutive.
downstream:
- target: Flushing
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Acetaldehyde is a vasodilator; the cutaneous vasodilation it causes is the
visible sign the syndrome is named for.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "This so-called alcohol flushing response (also known as “Asian flush” or “Asian glow”) is predominantly due to an inherited deficiency in the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2)"
explanation: >-
Attributes the flushing response to ALDH2 deficiency.
- target: Tachycardia
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Part of the acute physiological response, measured as heart rate in the
alcohol-challenge protocol.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "show a characteristic physiological response to drinking alcohol that includes facial flushing (see Figure 1), nausea, and tachycardia"
explanation: >-
Names tachycardia as part of the characteristic response.
- target: Nausea
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
The third element of the acute triad.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "includes facial flushing (see Figure 1), nausea, and tachycardia"
explanation: >-
Names nausea as part of the characteristic response.
- target: Acetaldehyde Genotoxicity and Oxidative Stress
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
The same accumulated acetaldehyde is a genotoxin, so the acute symptomatic
arm and the long-term carcinogenic arm share one upstream node.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:15840430
reference_title: "Association of ALDH2 polymorphism with sensitivity to acetaldehyde-induced micronuclei and facial flushing after alcohol intake."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "The frequency of micronuclei induced by acetaldehyde increased in a dose-dependent manner with the largest increase seen in subjects that were homozygous for the ALDH2(2) allele."
explanation: >-
Dose-dependent chromosomal damage from acetaldehyde, greatest in the
genotype with least clearance capacity.
- name: Acetaldehyde Genotoxicity and Oxidative Stress
biological_scale: CELLULAR
description: >-
Accumulated acetaldehyde damages DNA - measurable as micronucleus formation
in lymphocytes - and alcohol metabolism in cells carrying reduced-activity
ALDH2 variants generates excess reactive oxygen species. This is the
mechanistic bridge from a transient flushing reaction to a durable cancer
risk.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: reactive oxygen species metabolic process
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0072593
label: reactive oxygen species metabolic process
evidence:
- reference: PMID:15840430
reference_title: "Association of ALDH2 polymorphism with sensitivity to acetaldehyde-induced micronuclei and facial flushing after alcohol intake."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "Alcohol-induced facial flushing was also associated with an increased frequency of micronuclei in lymphocytes treated with acetaldehyde."
explanation: >-
Links the clinical sign directly to measured genotoxicity in the same
subjects.
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: "the R101G and R114W variants had a 2-3-fold increase in reactive oxygen species formation with respect to wild type ALDH2"
explanation: >-
The oxidative-stress arm, measured for the two newer variants.
downstream:
- target: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk
causal_link_type: INDIRECT_KNOWN_INTERMEDIATES
description: >-
Repeated genotoxic acetaldehyde exposure of the upper aerodigestive
epithelium over years of drinking raises squamous carcinoma risk. The
intermediates - mutation accumulation, clonal expansion, dysplasia - are
the standard carcinogenesis sequence and are curated in the oesophageal
cancer entries rather than duplicated here.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "few are aware of the accumulating evidence that ALDH2-deficient individuals are at much higher risk of esophageal cancer (specifically squamous cell carcinoma) from alcohol consumption than individuals with fully active ALDH2"
explanation: >-
States the risk relationship and its specificity to squamous cell
carcinoma.
- reference: PMID:24477652
reference_title: "Association between gastric cardia adenocarcinoma risk and alcohol flushing response, but not alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The drinkers with flushing response also had a higher ESCC risk than those without flushing response."
explanation: >-
Independent case-control confirmation using flushing as the exposure
variable.
phenotypes:
- category: Dermatologic
name: Flushing
description: >-
Cutaneous vasodilation of the face and often the neck and upper chest,
beginning within minutes of drinking. The visible sign the syndrome is named
for, and - because most affected people notice it - the basis for
identifying ALDH2 deficiency by history alone.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Flushing
term:
id: HP:0031284
label: Flushing
temporality: ACUTE
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "show a characteristic physiological response to drinking alcohol that includes facial flushing (see Figure 1), nausea, and tachycardia"
explanation: >-
Names facial flushing as the leading element of the response.
- reference: PMID:15840430
reference_title: "Association of ALDH2 polymorphism with sensitivity to acetaldehyde-induced micronuclei and facial flushing after alcohol intake."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "A significant association was observed between the ALDH2 genotype and alcohol-induced facial flushing."
explanation: >-
Genotype-phenotype association measured directly rather than assumed.
- category: Cardiovascular
name: Tachycardia
description: >-
Rise in heart rate accompanying the flush, measured as part of the
physiological response in controlled alcohol-challenge protocols.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Tachycardia
term:
id: HP:0001649
label: Tachycardia
temporality: ACUTE
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "characteristic physiological response to drinking alcohol that includes facial flushing (see Figure 1), nausea, and tachycardia"
explanation: >-
Names tachycardia in the characteristic response.
- category: Gastrointestinal
name: Nausea
description: >-
Nausea after drinking, the third element of the acute triad and part of what
makes the reaction aversive enough to reduce drinking.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Nausea
term:
id: HP:0002018
label: Nausea
temporality: ACUTE
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "facial flushing (see Figure 1), nausea, and tachycardia"
explanation: >-
Names nausea in the characteristic response.
- category: Oncologic
name: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk
description: >-
Markedly elevated risk of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma among
ALDH2-deficient people who drink. This is a *conditional* risk, not a
feature of the genotype: a carrier who does not drink does not carry the
excess risk, which is precisely why the flushing history is actionable. A
Chinese case-control study also found elevated gastric cardia adenocarcinoma
risk in flushers, with the striking result that alcohol consumption alone
showed no significant association while flushing status did.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Esophageal carcinoma
term:
id: HP:0011459
label: Esophageal carcinoma
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "ALDH2-deficient individuals are at much higher risk of esophageal cancer (specifically squamous cell carcinoma) from alcohol consumption than individuals with fully active ALDH2"
explanation: >-
The central risk claim, with its restriction to squamous cell carcinoma
and its conditioning on alcohol consumption both stated.
- reference: PMID:24477652
reference_title: "Association between gastric cardia adenocarcinoma risk and alcohol flushing response, but not alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "the adjusted ORs for flushing response of GCA and ESCC was 2.03 (95% CI 1.15-3.56, p=0.014) and 2.32 (95% CI 1.34-4.03, p=0.003), respectively, compared with those reporting no flushing response"
explanation: >-
Quantifies the risk for both oesophageal squamous carcinoma and gastric
cardia adenocarcinoma using flushing as the exposure variable.
- reference: PMID:24477652
reference_title: "Association between gastric cardia adenocarcinoma risk and alcohol flushing response, but not alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "There is no significant association between GCA risk and alcohol consumption."
explanation: >-
The negative result that makes the positive one interesting: in this
cohort the risk tracked flushing status rather than drinking quantity.
- reference: PMID:29707772
reference_title: "Association of low-activity ALDH2 and alcohol consumption with risk of esophageal cancer in Chinese adults: A population-based cohort study."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Among both male and female participants who consumed alcohol less than weekly (n = 69,519; 211 EC cases), low active or inactive ALDH2 was not associated with increased EC risk"
explanation: >-
The conditionality of the risk, measured prospectively in the 0.5-million
China Kadoorie Biobank cohort: in people who barely drink, the genotype
carries no excess oesophageal cancer risk at all. This is the single
strongest evidence for the claim this phenotype's description makes.
- reference: PMID:29707772
reference_title: "Association of low-activity ALDH2 and alcohol consumption with risk of esophageal cancer in Chinese adults: A population-based cohort study."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The increased EC risk associated with \"soon\" response or rs671 GA was apparent in men consuming alcohol ≥30g/d."
explanation: >-
The other half of the same conditionality - the excess risk appears at
higher intake. Same cohort, so the contrast is internal rather than
across studies.
- reference: PMID:37795758
reference_title: "Relationship between esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk and alcohol-related ALDH2 and ADH1B polymorphisms: Evidence from a meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization analysis."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "rs671 of ALDH2 was associated with a significantly reduced risk of ESCC (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50-0.73), whereas rs1229984 of ADH1B was associated with a significantly increased risk (2.50, 95% CI: 1.70-3.69) in the additive model."
explanation: >-
Curated as PARTIAL because read carelessly it says the opposite of this
phenotype. Across all subjects irrespective of drinking, rs671 looks
*protective* - which is what the Reduced heavy drinking phenotype
predicts, since carriers drink less. The risk is only visible once
drinking is conditioned on, as in the Kadoorie items above. The
genotype-level and exposure-conditioned estimates are not in conflict;
they are the two halves of this entry's central paradox, and both are
curated so neither can be quoted alone.
- reference: PMID:37795758
reference_title: "Relationship between esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk and alcohol-related ALDH2 and ADH1B polymorphisms: Evidence from a meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization analysis."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The MR analysis did not find a causal effect of alcohol on the esophageal cancer risk."
explanation: >-
A negative that complicates the causal story and is curated rather than
omitted: this meta-analysis's Mendelian randomization arm did not
establish a causal alcohol-oesophageal cancer effect. It does not overturn
the cohort findings above, but a reader should meet it here rather than
elsewhere.
- category: Behavioral
name: Reduced heavy drinking
description: >-
Carriers drink less. This is the protective side of the same allele and is
curated as a phenotype of this disorder rather than only as a genetic
modifier on the alcohol-use-disorder entry, because it is a direct
behavioural consequence of the aversive reaction. It is also what makes the
cancer risk paradoxical - carriers who *do* drink despite the reaction are
the high-risk group.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:15840430
reference_title: "Association of ALDH2 polymorphism with sensitivity to acetaldehyde-induced micronuclei and facial flushing after alcohol intake."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The frequency of heavy drinking was significantly higher among subjects with the ALDH2(1)/ALDH2(1) genotype than among subjects with the ALDH2(2) allele (ALDH2(1)/ALDH2(2) and ALDH2(2)/ALDH2(2) genotypes)."
explanation: >-
Measures the behavioural difference by genotype in the same cohort where
flushing and micronuclei were measured.
- reference: PMID:8290656
reference_title: "Dominance of the mutant ALDH2(2) allele in the expression of human stomach aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 activity."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The ALDH2 deficiency in Chinese has been implicated in alcohol flush reaction and reported to be a negative risk factor for development of alcohol dependence."
explanation: >-
States the protective relationship with alcohol dependence.
- reference: PMID:34310648
reference_title: "Combinations of alcohol-induced flushing with genetic polymorphisms of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases and the risk of alcohol dependence in Japanese men and women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Current alcohol flushing, the inactive ALDH2*1/*2 genotype, and the fast-metabolizing ADH1B*2 allele were less frequently found in the AD groups."
explanation: >-
A dedicated case-control study measuring the protective direction for
flushing and for both genotypes.
- reference: PMID:34310648
reference_title: "Combinations of alcohol-induced flushing with genetic polymorphisms of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases and the risk of alcohol dependence in Japanese men and women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Although alcohol flushing is influenced by the ALDH2 and ADH1B genotypes, constitutional or acquired flushing tolerance is an independent susceptibility trait for AD."
explanation: >-
The important qualifier, graded PARTIAL: protection is not automatic.
Tolerance to the flushing reaction - constitutional or acquired - is
itself an independent risk factor for dependence, so a carrier who stops
flushing loses the protection while keeping the enzyme defect.
environmental:
- name: Ethanol Ingestion
description: >-
Drinking ethanol is a necessary condition for every symptomatic feature of
this disorder. The entry is named for a *sensitivity*, so the exposure is
not a risk factor sitting alongside the genotype - it is the other half of
the cause. The exposure term is bound to the chemical rather than the
drinking-behaviour term because the mechanism curated here is ethanol
chemistry: oxidation to acetaldehyde and failure of its clearance.
exposure_term:
preferred_term: exposure to ethanol
term:
id: ECTO:9000027
label: exposure to ethanol
influences_mechanisms:
- target: Ethanol Oxidation to Acetaldehyde by Alcohol Dehydrogenase
environmental_effect: TRIGGERS
causal_link_type: DIRECT
description: >-
Ethanol is the substrate this step oxidises. Attaching here rather than at
the downstream accumulation node is the literal reading: the exposure
supplies substrate to the production step, and the accumulation follows
from production outrunning a defective clearance step. Without the
exposure there is no production, no accumulation, and no phenotype.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is critical for alcohol metabolism by converting acetaldehyde to acetic acid."
explanation: >-
Places ethanol metabolism upstream of the acetaldehyde step this
exposure triggers.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "human subjects were given an alcohol challenge (0.25 g/kg) while quantifying acetaldehyde levels and the physiological response (heart rate and skin temperature) to alcohol"
explanation: >-
A controlled, dosed ethanol exposure producing the measured response -
the exposure itself, evidenced.
genetic:
- name: ALDH2
features: >-
Mitochondrial low-Km aldehyde dehydrogenase 2. rs671 (p.Glu504Lys) is the
common inactivating allele, carried by an estimated 540 million people
worldwide - about 8% of the global population and roughly 36% of East
Asians. rs747096195 (p.Arg101Gly) and rs190764869 (p.Arg114Trp) are rarer
variants producing the same flushing phenotype in non-East-Asian
individuals, so ancestry is not a reliable screen. Note the numbering: rs671
is written p.Glu504Lys against the precursor and E487K against the mature
protein; both refer to the same substitution.
gene_term:
preferred_term: ALDH2
term:
id: hgnc:404
label: ALDH2
relationship_type: CAUSATIVE
variant_origin: GERMLINE
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "we estimate that there are at least 540 million ALDH2-deficient individuals in the world, representing approximately 8% of the population"
explanation: >-
The population scale of the deficient genotype.
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "As alcohol flushing is not exclusive to those of East Asian descent, we questioned whether additional ALDH2 genetic variants can drive facial flushing and inefficient acetaldehyde metabolism using human testing and biochemical assays."
explanation: >-
The premise that led to the two additional variants, and the reason
ancestry cannot be used to rule the diagnosis out.
- name: ADH1B
features: >-
Alcohol dehydrogenase 1B, the upstream enzyme of the same two-step pathway.
It does not cause acute alcohol sensitivity, but it sets the rate at which
the acetaldehyde ALDH2 must clear is produced, so it modifies both the
reaction and the downstream cancer risk. The slow-metabolizing ADH1B*1/*1
genotype combined with inactive ALDH2*1/*2 carries a far larger risk of
oesophageal iodine-unstained lesions than either genotype alone: in
PMID:30629674's multiple logistic models the separate odds ratios were 12.5
and 9.89 for ADH1B*1/*1 and 2.94 and 3.79 for ALDH2*1/*2, against 39.3 for
the combination. Note that ADH1B carried the larger independent effect in
that cohort - a reason not to treat ALDH2 genotype as the whole story.
gene_term:
preferred_term: ADH1B
term:
id: hgnc:250
label: ADH1B
relationship_type: MODIFIER
variant_origin: GERMLINE
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30629674
reference_title: "Endoscopic screening using esophageal iodine staining and genotypes of ADH1B and ALDH2 in Japanese alcohol-dependent women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The combination of ADH1B*1/*1 and ALDH2*1/*2 markedly increased the risk of esophageal DIULs ≥5 mm (39.3 [10.6-146])."
explanation: >-
The joint-genotype odds ratio, far above the ORs for either genotype
separately in the same model - the quantitative basis for curating ADH1B
as a modifier rather than ignoring it.
- reference: PMID:30629674
reference_title: "Endoscopic screening using esophageal iodine staining and genotypes of ADH1B and ALDH2 in Japanese alcohol-dependent women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Although the inactive heterozygous ALDH2*1/*2 genotype was more common (33.3% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.002) in the group with DIULs ≥5 mm than in the group without DIULs ≥5 mm"
explanation: >-
The ALDH2 half of the same model, quoted from a sentence that survives
snippet matching. The separate odds ratios for each genotype
(ADH1B*1/*1 12.5 and 9.89; ALDH2*1/*2 2.94 and 3.79) are in the same
abstract but cannot be quoted here, because their bracketed confidence
intervals are stripped by snippet matching; they are reported in the
`features` text above instead.
- reference: PMID:34310648
reference_title: "Combinations of alcohol-induced flushing with genetic polymorphisms of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases and the risk of alcohol dependence in Japanese men and women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The combination of the alcohol flushing status and the ALDH2 and ADH1B genotypes can provide a better new strategy for AD risk assessment than the alcohol flushing status alone or the genotypes alone in Asian men and women."
explanation: >-
Independent statement that the two genotypes plus flushing status are
jointly more informative than any of them alone.
prevalence:
- population: East Asian (Japanese, Chinese, Korean)
measure_type: POINT_PREVALENCE
prevalence_class: ABOVE_1_IN_1000
rate_per_100000: 36000.0
notes: >-
Approximately 36% of East Asians show the alcohol flushing response. Entered
as 36,000 per 100,000. This is the prevalence of the flushing *response* in
that population, which the source attributes predominantly - not
exclusively - to ALDH2 deficiency.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Approximately 36% of East Asians (Japanese, Chinese, and Koreans) show a characteristic physiological response to drinking alcohol that includes facial flushing"
explanation: >-
The population figure, with the ancestry group it applies to.
- population: Worldwide
measure_type: POINT_PREVALENCE
prevalence_class: ABOVE_1_IN_1000
rate_per_100000: 8000.0
notes: >-
An estimated 540 million ALDH2-deficient individuals globally, about 8% of
the world population - entered as 8,000 per 100,000. This is the authors'
extrapolation from East Asian population sizes and expected genotype
frequencies, not a direct worldwide measurement, and it predates the
identification of the non-East-Asian variants, so it is likely an
underestimate of ALDH2-related flushing overall.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "we estimate that there are at least 540 million ALDH2-deficient individuals in the world, representing approximately 8% of the population"
explanation: >-
The worldwide figure. The surrounding sentence, which cannot be quoted
here because it contains an inline citation marker that snippet matching
strips, states the derivation: it is extrapolated from Japanese, Chinese
and Korean population sizes and expected genotype frequencies - the basis
for the caveat in this record's note.
- population: Chinese subjects sampled by gastroendoscopic biopsy
measure_type: CARRIER_FREQUENCY
prevalence_class: ABOVE_1_IN_1000
notes: >-
Of 30 subjects, 16 were ALDH2*1 homozygotes, 13 heterozygotes and 1 an
ALDH2*2 homozygote - 14 of 30 carrying at least one inactive allele. A very
small convenience sample from a mechanistic study, recorded because it is
the cohort in which the dominant-negative biochemistry was demonstrated,
not as a population estimate.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:8290656
reference_title: "Dominance of the mutant ALDH2(2) allele in the expression of human stomach aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 activity."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Sixteen subjects were homozygous for the ALDH2(1) allele, one was homozygous for ALDH2(2), and thirteen were the heterozygous genotype."
explanation: >-
The genotype breakdown of the cohort behind the mechanism claim.
diagnosis:
- name: Flushing history
description: >-
Asking whether alcohol has previously caused facial flushing identifies
ALDH2 deficiency without a laboratory test, because the reaction is
intense enough that affected people are aware of it. The authors of the
landmark paper propose this explicitly as a clinical screening question and
the basis for counselling and, in high-risk patients, endoscopic screening.
Its performance is good but population-dependent, and the dependence runs
the wrong way for the people most at risk. In male clinic patients aged 50
and over, a validated flushing questionnaire had 96.1% sensitivity and
79.0% specificity for inactive ALDH2 - better on both counts than the
ethanol patch test (72.4% / 71.4%), which is worth stating because the
patch test is sometimes proposed as the more objective alternative. But in
472 Japanese *alcohol-dependent women*, sensitivity fell to 50.0%, against
88% previously reported in the Japanese general female population. The
authors' inference is the mechanistically interesting one: a *lack* of
flushing may itself be what allows a woman with inactive ALDH2 to become
alcohol-dependent, so the screen fails selectively in exactly the group
whose drinking puts them at highest oesophageal-cancer risk. A negative
flushing history in a heavy drinker should not be taken to exclude ALDH2
deficiency; genotyping should be.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: medical history taking
term:
id: NCIT:C18020
label: Diagnostic Procedure
evidence:
- reference: PMID:9419411
reference_title: "Reliability of a flushing questionnaire and the ethanol patch test in screening for inactive aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 and alcohol-related cancer risk."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "When all three categories of flushing (current always, former always, and sometimes) were collapsed into one, the questionnaire's sensitivity and specificity for identifying inactive ALDH2 were 96.1 and 79.0%, respectively, compared with 72.4 and 71.4% for the ethanol patch test."
explanation: >-
Quantifies the questionnaire and shows it outperforms the ethanol patch
test on both sensitivity and specificity.
- reference: PMID:30629674
reference_title: "Endoscopic screening using esophageal iodine staining and genotypes of ADH1B and ALDH2 in Japanese alcohol-dependent women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "the sensitivity and specificity of current or former flushing to identify the presence of inactive ALDH2 were 50.0% and 93.5%, respectively; these values were previously reported to be 88% and 92%, respectively, in a Japanese general female population"
explanation: >-
The failure mode. Graded PARTIAL because it qualifies the screening
recommendation rather than supporting it: sensitivity halves in
alcohol-dependent women.
- reference: PMID:30629674
reference_title: "Endoscopic screening using esophageal iodine staining and genotypes of ADH1B and ALDH2 in Japanese alcohol-dependent women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The low sensitivity in the present study suggests that a lack of alcohol flushing may play a crucial role in the development of alcohol dependence in women with inactive ALDH2."
explanation: >-
The authors' interpretation, which explains why the failure is selective
rather than random - and connects it to the Reduced heavy drinking
phenotype curated above.
- reference: PMID:34310648
reference_title: "Combinations of alcohol-induced flushing with genetic polymorphisms of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases and the risk of alcohol dependence in Japanese men and women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The temporal profiles for drinking and flushing in former-flushing AD subjects revealed that the flushing response disappeared soon after or before the start of habitual drinking during young adulthood, regardless of the ALDH2 genotype."
explanation: >-
Independent evidence that the flushing history can go negative over time
in the drinkers who matter most, which is the mechanism behind the low
sensitivity above.
- reference: PMID:29707772
reference_title: "Association of low-activity ALDH2 and alcohol consumption with risk of esophageal cancer in Chinese adults: A population-based cohort study."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Self-reported flushing response had low sensitivity (56.8%) and high specificity (88.4%) in identifying rs671 A allele among male weekly alcohol consumers."
explanation: >-
A third measurement, in a third population, completing a consistent
pattern rather than adding a fourth number: 96.1% in general male clinic
patients, 56.8% in male weekly drinkers, 50.0% in alcohol-dependent
women. Sensitivity degrades as drinking increases - so the screening
question is least reliable precisely where the cancer risk is
concentrated. Graded PARTIAL for the same reason as the other limit
items.
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Therefore clinicians can determine ALDH2 deficiency simply by asking about previous episodes of alcohol-induced flushing."
explanation: >-
The screening recommendation, stated as a method.
- reference: PMID:24477652
reference_title: "Association between gastric cardia adenocarcinoma risk and alcohol flushing response, but not alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "In conclusion, alcohol flushing response is a clinically useful biomarker of susceptibility to GCA and ESCC risk from alcohol."
explanation: >-
Independent endorsement of flushing history as a risk biomarker.
- reference: PMID:19320537
reference_title: "The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "ALDH2-deficient patients can then be counseled to reduce alcohol consumption, and high-risk patients can be assessed for endoscopic cancer screening"
explanation: >-
The actionable consequence of a positive flushing history - what the
screening question is *for*.
- name: Endoscopic screening with esophageal iodine staining
description: >-
Lugol chromoendoscopy detects distinct iodine-unstained lesions (DIULs) in
the oesophageal squamous mucosa - a marker of field cancerization, and in
one Japanese series of 472 alcohol-dependent women, lesions that proved on
histology to be low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 26 patients and
superficial squamous cell carcinoma in 9. This is the secondary-prevention
step that the flushing history and genotype are used to select for.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: esophageal iodine staining chromoendoscopy
term:
id: NCIT:C16546
label: Endoscopic Procedure
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30629674
reference_title: "Endoscopic screening using esophageal iodine staining and genotypes of ADH1B and ALDH2 in Japanese alcohol-dependent women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "we investigated the results of screening using esophageal iodine staining and the identification of determinants for esophageal DIULs in 472 Japanese alcohol-dependent women"
explanation: >-
Documents iodine-staining endoscopic screening applied to an
ALDH2-relevant at-risk population.
- reference: PMID:30629674
reference_title: "Endoscopic screening using esophageal iodine staining and genotypes of ADH1B and ALDH2 in Japanese alcohol-dependent women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "DIULs ≥5 mm were histologically diagnosed as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 26 patients and superficial squamous cell carcinoma in 9 patients."
explanation: >-
Shows the screen detects real neoplasia rather than an incidental
staining artefact, which is what makes it worth performing.
- reference: PMID:30629674
reference_title: "Endoscopic screening using esophageal iodine staining and genotypes of ADH1B and ALDH2 in Japanese alcohol-dependent women."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The presence of large or multiple esophageal distinct iodine-unstained lesions (DIULs) is a strong predictor of field cancerization in the upper aerodigestive tract."
explanation: >-
States what the finding means - field cancerization, not a single lesion.
- name: ALDH2 genotyping
description: >-
Molecular testing for rs671 and, where the history suggests flushing in a
non-East-Asian individual, wider ALDH2 sequencing - since two further
flushing-causing variants have been described that an rs671-only assay
would miss.
diagnosis_term:
preferred_term: molecular genetic analysis
term:
id: NCIT:C19770
label: Molecular Analysis
evidence:
- reference: PMID:8290656
reference_title: "Dominance of the mutant ALDH2(2) allele in the expression of human stomach aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 activity."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "determined the genotypes from leukocytes of the same individuals by using polymerase-chain-reaction amplification and hybridization with allele-specific oligonucleotide probes"
explanation: >-
Describes the genotyping approach in the study that paired genotype with
enzyme phenotype.
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "the methodology developed here to characterize ALDH2 genetic variant response to alcohol can lead the way precision medicine strategies to further understand the interplay of alcohol consumption, ALDH2 genetics, and cancer"
explanation: >-
The authors' framing of genotype-guided assessment, which is the rationale
for testing beyond rs671.
animal_models:
- name: Aldh2 knockout mouse
species: Mouse
genotype: Aldh2 -/- (homozygous knockout); Aldh2 +/+ wild-type comparator
publication: PMID:19874182
description: >-
The standard rodent model of human ALDH2 inactivity. Note the allelic
mismatch: this is a null, whereas the common human allele rs671 is a
dominant-negative missense subunit that assembles into tetramers. The null
reproduces the *consequence* (no ALDH2 activity, acetaldehyde
accumulation) without reproducing the *mechanism* by which a single human
allele achieves it. The source is a review of published Aldh2-knockout
studies rather than a single primary experiment.
modeled_mechanisms:
- target: Acetaldehyde Accumulation After Ethanol Exposure
relationship: RECAPITULATES
fidelity: MODERATE
description: >-
Knockout mice exposed to ethanol or acetaldehyde show higher blood
acetaldehyde and greater toxicity than wild-type, which is the defining
biochemical feature of the human disorder.
limitations: >-
A null allele models homozygous ALDH2 inactivity, not the heterozygous
dominant-negative state that most affected humans carry; the human
phenotype's hallmark - that one poisoned subunit disables the tetramer -
cannot be represented by an absent protein. The cited source is also a
review rather than primary data.
readouts:
- name: Blood acetaldehyde after ethanol or acetaldehyde exposure
target: Acetaldehyde Accumulation After Ethanol Exposure
direction: INCREASED
interpretation: >-
Higher blood acetaldehyde in knockouts than wild-type reproduces the
human biochemical phenotype.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19874182
reference_title: "Characteristics of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (Aldh2) knockout mice."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: "When they were exposed to atmospheres containing acetaldehyde, the Aldh2 -/- mice showed more severe toxic symptoms, like weight loss and higher blood acetaldehyde levels, as compared with the Aldh2 +/+ mice."
explanation: >-
The measurement, with the wild-type comparator stated.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:19874182
reference_title: "Characteristics of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (Aldh2) knockout mice."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: MODEL_ORGANISM
snippet: "Aldh2 knockout mice appear to be a valid animal model for humans with inactive ALDH2"
explanation: >-
The authors' own claim that the model is valid for human ALDH2
inactivity, which is what justifies curating this link.
differential_diagnoses:
- name: Alcohol Use Disorder
description: >-
Not a diagnostic confusion so much as the mechanistic mirror image, and the
reason this entry matters to the rest of the knowledge base. The same
inactive ALDH2 allele that *causes* acute alcohol sensitivity is one of the
two largest-effect *protective* loci against alcohol use disorder, because
the reaction is aversive. `Alcohol_Use_Disorder` already curates ALDH2 in
that protective role; this entry curates the disorder that produces the
aversion.
disease_term:
preferred_term: alcohol use disorder
term:
id: MONDO:0007079
label: alcohol dependence
distinguishing_features:
- Opposite direction of the same allele - carriers are less likely, not more likely, to develop dependence.
- Acute alcohol sensitivity is an exposure-triggered metabolic reaction with an onset in minutes; alcohol use disorder is a chronic behavioural condition.
- A carrier who abstains has neither condition; a carrier who drinks despite the reaction carries elevated cancer risk without necessarily meeting dependence criteria.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:8290656
reference_title: "Dominance of the mutant ALDH2(2) allele in the expression of human stomach aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 activity."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "reported to be a negative risk factor for development of alcohol dependence"
explanation: >-
States the protective direction explicitly.
- name: Disulfiram-ethanol reaction
description: >-
A pharmacologically identical syndrome produced on purpose. Disulfiram
inhibits ALDH2, so a patient taking it who drinks develops flushing, nausea
and tachycardia by the same acetaldehyde-accumulation mechanism curated
here. Cyanamide is another ALDH inhibitor used the same way. The
distinguishing feature is drug exposure, not phenotype - which is a useful
reminder that the mechanism, not the genotype, produces the syndrome.
distinguishing_features:
- Acquired and reversible on stopping the drug, rather than lifelong.
- No family history; onset coincides with starting an ALDH-inhibiting drug.
- Genotyping is normal at ALDH2 unless the patient also carries an inactivating variant, in which case the reaction is more severe.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:39075523
reference_title: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is critical for alcohol metabolism by converting acetaldehyde to acetic acid."
explanation: >-
Supports the shared enzymatic step that a pharmacological ALDH2 inhibitor
blocks. Graded PARTIAL because this entry holds no source characterising
the disulfiram reaction itself; that claim rests on the shared mechanism,
and a curator adding disulfiram detail should cite a source for it.
discussions:
- discussion_id: aldh2_scope_susceptibility_or_disease
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
status: OPEN
prompt: >-
Is acute alcohol sensitivity a disease entry, or a susceptibility annotation
that belongs on the alcohol-related entries rather than standing alone?
attaches_to:
- "pathophysiology#Acetaldehyde Accumulation After Ethanol Exposure"
rationale: >-
MONDO flags MONDO:0012454 `subset: omim_susceptibility`, and the honest
reading is that this concept sits on the boundary of what dismech curates as
a Disease. The case for curating it is that it has a defined
post-exposure phenotype with an onset in minutes, a measurable biochemical
marker (blood acetaldehyde, six-fold elevated in rs671 heterozygotes under
challenge), an OMIM entity, a causal gene with a demonstrated
dominant-negative mechanism, and an actionable clinical consequence - the
same footing as the existing Dihydropyrimidine_Dehydrogenase_Deficiency
entry, which is likewise a pharmacogenomic/metabolic sensitivity. The case
against is that its manifestations only exist under an elective exposure,
which makes it look more like a trait than a disease. This entry takes the
first position and records the second, rather than making the choice
silently. If dismech later adopts a general policy on exposure-conditioned
metabolic sensitivities, this entry should be revisited under it.
- discussion_id: aldh2_ancestry_framing_is_outdated
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
status: OPEN
prompt: >-
How much of ALDH2-related alcohol sensitivity outside East Asian
populations is missed because both the clinical framing and the standard
genetic test are built around rs671?
attaches_to:
- "pathophysiology#Inactivating ALDH2 Variant"
rationale: >-
The disorder is described almost everywhere - including in MONDO's own
definition, which says it is "usually found in Asians" - as an East Asian
condition caused by rs671. A 2024 alcohol-challenge study found two further
ALDH2 variants, rs747096195 and rs190764869, in flushing individuals who
were not of East Asian descent, each roughly doubling acetaldehyde by
mechanisms distinct from rs671's. An rs671-only assay returns normal for
those people, and an ancestry-based clinical heuristic never prompts the
test. Since the flushing history is the recommended screening question for
a markedly elevated oesophageal cancer risk, a systematic blind spot here
has a downstream consequence. What is not known is the population frequency
of these and other ALDH2 variants outside East Asia, or what fraction of
non-East-Asian flushers they explain.
proposed_experiments:
- experiment_id: aldh2_full_gene_sequencing_in_non_east_asian_flushers
name: Full ALDH2 sequencing in ancestry-diverse self-reported flushers
description: >-
Recruit self-reported alcohol flushers across ancestries, sequence the
full ALDH2 coding region rather than genotyping rs671 alone, and pair each
genotype with a standardised alcohol challenge measuring acetaldehyde,
heart rate and skin temperature - the protocol that identified the two
known additional variants.
readouts:
- name: Blood acetaldehyde after standardised alcohol challenge, by genotype
target: Acetaldehyde Accumulation After Ethanol Exposure
direction: INCREASED
interpretation: >-
Elevated acetaldehyde in rs671-negative flushers would quantify how much
of the phenotype an rs671-only test misses.
notes: >-
Scope decision, stated up front. MONDO marks MONDO:0012454 `subset:
omim_susceptibility`, so the first question this entry had to answer was
whether it should exist as a Disease rather than as a susceptibility
annotation on the alcohol-related entries. It is curated as a Disease on the
same grounds as the existing Dihydropyrimidine_Dehydrogenase_Deficiency entry:
a defined post-exposure phenotype, a measurable biochemical marker, an OMIM
entity, a causal gene with a demonstrated mechanism, and an actionable
clinical consequence. The counter-argument - that its manifestations exist
only under an elective exposure - is recorded as an open discussion rather
than dismissed.
Why this entry earns its place in the knowledge base. Two consequences of the
inactive ALDH2 allele were already curated without the disorder that produces
them: `Alcohol_Use_Disorder` names ALDH2 as one of two large-effect
*protective* loci, and the oesophageal cancer entries name it as a *risk*
factor. Both point at acetaldehyde accumulation, which had no entry of its
own. The `Reduced heavy drinking` phenotype and the Alcohol Use Disorder
differential are the deliberate joins.
Residue numbering. rs671 is written **p.Glu504Lys** against the precursor
protein and **E487K** against the mature protein after cleavage of the
mitochondrial targeting sequence; both name the same substitution. This entry
uses the 504 numbering throughout, matching dbSNP, MONDO and the 2024 paper.
Older literature using E487K is describing the same allele, not a second one -
worth stating, because a mismatched-numbering pair is exactly the kind of
thing that gets curated twice.
Ontology binding rationale for the exposure. Per the project's ECTO guidance,
the choice between `ECTO:0001082` (exposure to alcohol consumption, a
behaviour term) and `ECTO:9000027` (exposure to ethanol, anchored on
CHEBI:16236) follows what the entry's own name and mechanism state. This
entry's mechanism is ethanol chemistry - oxidation to acetaldehyde and failure
of its clearance - not a drinking-behaviour claim, so the environmental entry
is named `Ethanol Ingestion` and bound to the chemical term. `ECTO:9000027`
was verified against the local `sqlite:obo:ecto` build that
`conf/oak_config.yaml` actually uses for validation, not against OLS.
Cell-type term caution carried forward from this curation batch: a plain OAK
lookup returns real terms that are wrong for the intended sense often enough
that every identifier here was resolved by label before use.
Deep-research report: read, cross-checked, and mostly not used. `just
preflight-dr` returned PASS (ALDH2 mentioned 126 times; report OMIM 610251
matching the MONDO xref), but the report's own `reference_validation` block
reports **quotes_valid: 2 of quotes_checked: 5** - three quotes attributed to
sources that do not contain them (PMC:PMC9844601, PMID:9419411,
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1510757112). None of those three is cited by this entry, and
every snippet here was taken from an abstract read directly before the report
was generated, so no report-sourced quote entered the KB. But a 3-in-5
unsupported-quote rate is a stronger warning than a confabulation_rate of 0.0
suggests, and it is the reason the leads below were each re-checked against
PubMed independently rather than curated on the report's word.
A lesson this entry paid for twice, worth keeping because it generalizes.
An earlier version of these notes claimed a search "returned related papers
... but none establishing the surveillance recommendation". PMID:30629674 -
already sitting in `references_cache/` because this entry's own
deep-research run resolved it - is exactly that study, and is now curated as
a `diagnosis` entry. **A claim about what the literature does not contain is
still a claim, and that one was made without checking the cache this entry
was shipping.** The same paper then supplied the flushing-history limits the
diagnosis entry was missing.
The ESCC risk is exposure-conditioned, and both halves are curated so
neither can be quoted alone. In a 0.5-million prospective cohort, people
drinking less than weekly showed *no* excess oesophageal cancer risk from
inactive ALDH2; the risk appears at higher intake (rs671 GA vs GG HR 3.31 in
male weekly consumers). Meanwhile a meta-analysis across all subjects
irrespective of drinking found rs671 *protective* for ESCC (OR 0.60) - which
is what the `Reduced heavy drinking` phenotype predicts, since carriers
drink less. Those two estimates are not in conflict; they are the two halves
of this entry's central paradox. That meta-analysis's Mendelian
randomization arm also failed to establish a causal alcohol effect, curated
as a PARTIAL negative rather than omitted.
The flushing screen degrades exactly where it matters. Sensitivity for
inactive ALDH2 is 96.1% in general male clinic patients, 56.8% in male
weekly drinkers, and 50.0% in alcohol-dependent women - three populations,
three papers, one monotone pattern. A negative flushing history in a heavy
drinker does not exclude ALDH2 deficiency; genotyping does.
Leads still NOT curated, each re-checked:
- *Antihistamine and H2-blocker masking of the flush.* Still unsourced: a
targeted PubMed search returned only papers from 1980 and 1982, neither
stating it. Not asserted. A curator who finds a modern source should add it
as a harm-framed treatment entry.
- *ALDH2 activators (Alda-1, AD-9308).* Investigational, and not a therapy
for the flush reaction itself.
- *Amplified reaction with metronidazole, cephalosporins and sulfonylureas.*
Only the disulfiram arm is represented, as a differential graded PARTIAL on
the shared enzymatic step.
Scoping decision on non-cancer sequelae. The chronic consequences curated
here stop at the upper-aerodigestive carcinogenesis arm. Cardiovascular
associations (coronary vasospasm, hypertension, atrial fibrillation),
amyloid/neurodegeneration links, and the ALDH5/formaldehyde AMeD-syndrome arm
all appear in the deep-research report and are real literatures, but each is
a downstream disease with its own mechanism rather than a feature of acute
alcohol sensitivity, and curating them here would make this entry a
general ALDH2 review. They belong on the relevant disease entries, which can
reference this one.
Not curated, and why. No `treatments` block: there is no therapy for this
disorder, and the intervention that matters - not drinking, or drinking less -
is the avoidance of the trigger rather than a treatment of the condition. It
is represented instead by the `Ethanol Ingestion` environmental entry and by
the `Flushing history` diagnosis entry, which carries the counselling and
endoscopic-screening rationale. Curating "alcohol avoidance" as a Treatment
would assert a clinical recommendation with a shape the sources do not have.
The disulfiram-ethanol reaction is curated as a differential on the strength
of the shared enzymatic step only; the evidence item is graded PARTIAL and
says so. A curator adding disulfiram detail should cite a source describing
that reaction directly rather than inheriting this one.
Overview. "Acute Alcohol Sensitivity" is the OMIM-recognized clinical phenotype produced by inherited deficiency of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2), the enzyme that oxidizes acetaldehyde (the first, toxic metabolite of ethanol) to acetate. Loss-of-function of ALDH2 causes rapid systemic accumulation of acetaldehyde after even modest alcohol intake, producing a stereotyped acute reaction — facial/upper-body flushing, tachycardia, palpitations, nausea, headache, and malaise — commonly called the "alcohol flush reaction" or, colloquially, "Asian flush"/"Asian glow." It is one of the most common single-gene enzymopathies in humans, affecting an estimated ~540 million people, concentrated in East Asian populations (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) (Disease Models & Mechanisms review).
Key identifiers: - OMIM Phenotype: #610251 — ALCOHOL SENSITIVITY, ACUTE (OMIM #610251) - OMIM Gene: 100650 — ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE 2; ALDH2 (12q24.12) - MONDO: MONDO:0012454 (Malacards) - NIH Genetic Testing Registry condition: C2674838 (GTR) - ClinVar variant-condition record: NM_000690.4(ALDH2):c.1510G>A (p.Glu504Lys) associated with "Alcohol sensitivity, acute" (ClinVar RCV000020058) - dbSNP: rs671 (the causal variant) - Related digenic disorder: AMeD syndrome* (OMIM #619151), caused by biallelic ADH5 variants plus the ALDH2 p.Glu504Lys allele (OMIM #619151; Oda et al., Sci Adv 2021, PMID:33355142)
Common synonyms: Alcohol flush reaction/syndrome; Asian flush; Asian glow; ALDH2 deficiency; ALDH2*2 deficiency; aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 deficiency; alcohol-induced flushing; "Oriental flushing syndrome" (older, non-preferred literature term).
Evidence basis. The evidentiary base is overwhelmingly aggregated, population-level and cohort/case-control human genetic epidemiology (large East Asian biobank and hospital cohorts, twin/family studies, GWAS), supplemented by mechanistic biochemistry/structural biology and mouse-model (ALDH2-knockout and ALDH2*2 knock-in) experimental data — not primarily individual patient EHR case reports, since this is a common polymorphism-driven trait rather than a rare monogenic disease discovered through isolated patients.
Primary cause — genetic. Acute alcohol sensitivity is caused by the common East Asian-specific missense variant rs671 (c.1510G>A, p.Glu504Lys, historically "Glu487Lys" under older numbering) in ALDH2. This substitution sits at a subunit-interface within the small oligomerization domain of the ALDH2 homotetramer and destabilizes/inactivates the enzyme in a dominant-negative fashion: because ALDH2 functions as a tetramer, incorporation of even one mutant subunit disproportionately poisons the whole complex, so heterozygotes (~10–45% residual activity) and homozygotes (~1–5% residual activity) are both symptomatic, though homozygotes are far more severely affected (Larson et al., structural analysis; population activity data via selfdecode summary).
"The presence of the E487K subunit in ALDH2 decreases both the activity and stability of the heterotetramer in a dominant fashion... Since ALDH2 is a homotetrameric enzyme, random association of active and inactive subunits should generate about 6% normal tetramers, with the remainder containing at least 1 mutant subunit."
A second, less severe modifying/compounding factor is variation in ADH1B (alcohol dehydrogenase 1B, chromosome 4q23), the enzyme immediately upstream of ALDH2 that converts ethanol to acetaldehyde. The gain-of-function variant ADH1B*2 (rs1229984, Arg48His) accelerates ethanol→acetaldehyde conversion up to ~40-fold, so individuals carrying both fast ADH1B2 and slow ALDH22 experience the most rapid and severe acetaldehyde surges and flushing (review; selfdecode).
Risk factors: - Genetic: ALDH2 rs671 A allele (heterozygous or homozygous); co-inheritance of the fast-metabolizing ADH1B2 (rs1229984) allele amplifies the phenotype (PMC8312924). - Ancestry/environmental: East Asian ancestry (Han Chinese, Japanese, Korean) — the rs671 allele is essentially absent in African, European, and most Southeast Asian/Indian populations (DMM review). - Dose/behavioral:* Even modest alcohol intake precipitates symptoms; concomitant use of pharmacologic ALDH inhibitors (e.g., disulfiram, metronidazole, some cephalosporins, sulfonylureas) produces an analogous but pharmacologically-induced "disulfiram-alcohol reaction" that phenocopies the genetic condition (StatPearls Disulfiram; Wikipedia disulfiram-alcohol reaction).
Protective factors — genetic paradox. The very allele that causes the flush reaction is strongly protective against alcohol use disorder and alcoholic cirrhosis, because the aversive symptoms discourage heavy/habitual drinking:
"The ALDH2 rs671 GA/AA genotypes significantly reduced the risk of alcohol-induced mental disorders by 87%, alcohol dependence syndrome by 83%, and alcohol abuse by 66%." (Chang et al., Cancer Medicine 2023 review, PMC9844601)
Gene-environment interaction. The central G×E interaction of this condition is that the genotype is phenotypically silent without alcohol exposure — the enzyme deficiency only manifests acute symptoms and long-term tissue risk upon ethanol challenge. Critically, epidemiologic data show that the increased cancer risk conferred by ALDH2 deficiency is conditional on alcohol consumption:
"Among male weekly alcohol consumers, both flushing response and rs671 were associated with EC [esophageal cancer] risk, suggesting that the possession of inactive ALDH2 does not increase EC risk unless alcohol is consumed." (AACR CEBP)
Suggested CHEBI terms: CHEBI:16236 (ethanol), CHEBI:15343 (acetaldehyde), CHEBI:15366 (acetic acid), CHEBI:27897 (disulfiram).
The acute reaction is a symptom cluster/behavioral+physiological syndrome, not a single defect, occurring within minutes to ~1 hour of alcohol ingestion.
| Phenotype | Type | Suggested HPO term | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facial/cutaneous flushing | Clinical sign | HP:0031282 (Flushing) | Cardinal, near-universal sign; erythema of face, neck, upper trunk |
| Tachycardia | Clinical sign | HP:0001649 (Tachycardia) | Acetaldehyde-mediated catecholamine release |
| Palpitations | Symptom | HP:0001962 (Palpitations) | |
| Nausea | Symptom | HP:0002018 (Nausea) | |
| Headache | Symptom | HP:0002315 (Headache) | |
| Muscle weakness | Symptom | HP:0001324 (Muscle weakness) | |
| Hypotension (occasionally) | Clinical sign | HP:0002615 (Hypotension) | More prominent with pharmacologic (disulfiram) reaction |
| Severe/prolonged hangover | Symptom | (no precise HPO; consider free text) | Reported to be disproportionately severe |
| Elevated blood acetaldehyde | Lab abnormality | (biochemical marker, not HP-coded) | Documented up to 6-fold higher than wild-type after challenge |
Characteristics: - Onset: First alcohol exposure (often adolescence/young adulthood in cultures where alcohol is introduced socially); the reaction is present from the individual's very first drink and does not need to be "acquired." - Course: Acute, self-limited, episodic — recurs with every exposure to alcohol; not progressive as a standalone reaction, though repeated exposure across a lifetime is linked to cumulative tissue-damage risk (see Mechanism/Prognosis). - Severity/penetrance: Highly genotype-dependent — ALDH22 homozygotes show near-complete flushing penetrance and the most severe reaction; heterozygotes show a graded, often milder or inconsistent response, and can sometimes "drink through" the reaction with habituation (which does not reduce the underlying carcinogenic acetaldehyde exposure). - Frequency: In a Japanese cohort, "symptoms of facial flushing, palpitation, tachycardia, muscle weakness, headache and nausea present in nearly 43% of those with the deficiency" (search synthesis of Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev data). Genotype–phenotype concordance is high: "Blinded genotyping showed inactive ALDH2 for 94.4% of subjects who reported always flushing... whereas 95.6% of subjects reporting that they never exhibited facial flushing had active ALDH2" (PMID:9419411). - Quality of life:* Primarily social/behavioral — the reaction often leads to reduced or avoided alcohol consumption, with secondary social effects in cultures with strong drinking norms; a chronic downstream QoL burden accrues from increased skin flushing self-consciousness and (per §11/§2) elevated long-term cancer/cardiometabolic risk in those who drink despite the reaction.
Causal gene: ALDH2 (Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Family Member; HGNC:404; OMIM *100650), chromosome 12q24.12, encoding the mitochondrial matrix tetrameric enzyme that oxidizes acetaldehyde to acetate using NAD⁺.
Primary pathogenic variant: - rs671, c.1510G>A, p.Glu504Lys (also historically numbered p.Glu487Lys, reflecting mature-protein vs. precursor numbering) — classified in ClinVar as pathogenic/associated with "Alcohol sensitivity, acute" (ClinVar RCV000020058). - Allele designations: ALDH2*1 (wild-type/active) vs. ALDH2*2 (rs671-A, inactive/hypomorphic). - Functional consequence: Dominant-negative loss-of-function via disruption of tetramer assembly/stability — not a simple recessive loss-of-function. Both GA heterozygotes (10–45% residual activity) and AA homozygotes (1–5% residual activity) are enzymatically deficient (search synthesis, gnomAD/functional summary). - Novel/rarer ALDH2 coding variants beyond rs671 causing additional acetaldehyde-accumulation phenotypes were recently catalogued: "Uncovering newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 genetic variants that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation after an alcohol challenge" (PMID:39075523, J Transl Med 2024).
Population/allele frequency: - rs671-A allele frequency: ~30–50% across East Asian populations (up to ~40% in Han Chinese and Japanese); minor allele frequency ~0.24 in Japanese (HapMap JPT), ~0.15 in Han Chinese (HapMap HCB); gnomAD/1000 Genomes-scale estimates give ~0.255 in East Asians versus ~0.0003 (essentially absent) outside East Asia (search synthesis; historical population survey). - Historically reported "absent ALDH2" activity frequencies ranged as high as 69% in some Indigenous Ecuadorian Highland populations down to 0% in Egyptian, Liberian, Kenyan, and European populations, though the East Asian-specific rs671 variant itself is the dominant, best-characterized cause in modern genomic data. - The allele is thought to have arisen from a single mutational event roughly 2,000–7,000 years ago in central China and spread with rice-domesticating agricultural populations ("Origin and Spread of the ALDH2 Glu504Lys Allele," PMC9590465) — a leading hypothesis is that it was positively selected as protection against alcohol-associated pathogens/toxicity or alcoholism in early agrarian society.
Modifier gene: ADH1B (4q23; HGNC:249), particularly rs1229984 (Arg48His, "ADH1B*2"), which increases the rate of ethanol-to-acetaldehyde conversion and synergistically worsens the flushing phenotype and downstream cancer risk when co-inherited with ALDH22. A second ADH1B variant (rs1042026 / "ADH1B3", predominantly in African-ancestry populations) has related but less-studied effects. ALDH2 rs674 is also examined alongside rs671 in some association studies.
Epigenetics/somatic: Not a classical epigenetic disease; however, acetaldehyde itself is a potent DNA-damaging agent (forms DNA adducts, induces sister chromatid exchange), and ALDH2 deficiency is mechanistically linked to accelerated acetaldehyde-DNA adduct accumulation in exposed tissues — this is the proposed causal chain for the elevated cancer risk (see Mechanism), rather than a primary epigenetic mechanism.
Chromosomal abnormalities: None reported; this is a single-nucleotide missense polymorphism, not a structural/copy-number disorder.
Related digenic disorder (molecular context): AMeD syndrome (Aplastic anemia, Mental retardation, and short stature, Digenic) arises when biallelic loss-of-function ADH5 (cytosolic formaldehyde dehydrogenase) variants co-occur with a heterozygous or homozygous ALDH2 p.Glu504Lys allele, causing loss of the combined formaldehyde-detoxification pathway (ADH5 + ALDH2), leading to bone marrow failure, developmental delay, and short stature — illustrating that ALDH2 deficiency's biochemical consequences extend beyond ethanol to endogenous aldehyde (formaldehyde) clearance (Oda et al. 2021, Sci Adv, PMID:33355142; OMIM #619151).
Suggested gene/ontology annotations: hgnc:404 (ALDH2), hgnc:249 (ADH1B); GO biological process GO:0006068 (ethanol catabolic process) / GO:0046185 (aldehyde catabolic process); GO molecular function GO:0004029 (aldehyde dehydrogenase [NAD+] activity). (IDs given from general ontology knowledge — verify canonical labels via OAK before curation.)
Suggested exposure ontology term: ECTO term for "exposure to ethanol" / "consumption of alcoholic beverage" (verify exact CURIE via OAK/ECTO lookup).
Causal chain (upstream → downstream):
Cell types/tissues implicated: hepatocytes (primary site of ethanol/acetaldehyde metabolism), vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells (flushing, coronary spasm), esophageal squamous epithelial cells (carcinogenesis), cardiac myocytes/fibroblasts (remodeling, AF), neurons/microglia/astrocytes (amyloid pathology), and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (AMeD syndrome).
Suggested GO terms: GO:0006068 ethanol catabolic process; GO:0006081 cellular aldehyde metabolic process; GO:0034599 cellular response to oxidative stress; GO:0006284 base-excision repair (DNA-adduct repair context). Suggested CL terms: CL:0000182 hepatocyte; CL:0002138 endothelial cell of vascular tree; CL:0000646 basal cell (esophageal epithelium context); CL:0000000-level cardiac myocyte term. Suggested CHEBI terms: CHEBI:15343 acetaldehyde; ~4-hydroxynonenal (verify CHEBI CURIE via OAK).
Molecular/omics profiling: No large-scale disease-specific transcriptomic/proteomic/metabolomic dataset exists specifically for "acute alcohol sensitivity" as a phenotype per se (it is a challenge-dependent, not a steady-state, condition), but targeted metabolomic studies quantify blood/breath acetaldehyde as the definitive biochemical readout after an ethanol or ethanol-patch challenge.
GO:0005759 mitochondrial matrix) is the primary organelle-level site of the molecular lesion.Suggested UBERON terms: UBERON:0001043 esophagus; UBERON:0002107 liver; UBERON:0000948 heart; UBERON:0001003 skin epidermis; UBERON:0002037 cerebellum/UBERON:0000955 brain (amyloid context).
"Blinded genotyping showed inactive ALDH2 for 94.4% of subjects who reported always flushing... Genotype distribution... in subjects with positive ethanol patch test results was 5.9% for normal homozygote (NN), 82.4% for mutant heterozygote (NM), and 11.8% for mutant homozygote (MM)." (synthesis of patch-test validation literature)
The acute reaction itself is not life-threatening in typical social-drinking doses and resolves spontaneously; however, ALDH2 deficiency carries substantial long-term morbidity risk conditional on continued alcohol exposure:
"Beyond the Flush: Reframing ALDH2 Deficiency as a Public Health Risk" (Karger Public Health Genomics, 2025) — arguing the trait should be understood as a modifiable cancer/cardiovascular risk factor specifically in the (growing, per a 2025 AACR commentary) subset of carriers who drink despite the reaction, including in U.S./diaspora populations unfamiliar with the risk (AACR CEBP 2025, "ALDH2 Deficiency and Alcohol Intake in the United States: Opportunity for Precision Cancer Prevention").
There is no approved disease-modifying or curative treatment; management is centered on avoidance, symptomatic care, and risk counseling.
"Alda-1 increases activity of wild-type ALDH21 and variant ALDH22 (by ~2-fold and 11-fold respectively), and is capable of partly restoring mutant ALDH2*2 activity, providing protection against cardiac ischemia." (search synthesis of pharmacology literature)
These compounds are being explored preclinically/clinically for indications including ischemic stroke/cardioprotection, alcohol use disorder (reducing acquisition/relapse of drinking in animal models), diabetic cardiomyopathy, and protection of hematopoietic stem cells in Fanconi anemia models exposed to aldehyde stress — not yet as an approved therapy for the flush reaction itself. A related ANS-6637 clinical protocol for alcohol use disorder targeting ALDH2 pharmacology has been registered (NCT03970109) (ClinicalTrials.gov protocol PDF). - Pharmacogenomic caution: Because the same enzyme system is pharmacologically inhibited by disulfiram, metronidazole, and certain cephalosporins/sulfonylureas, ALDH2-deficient individuals should be counseled that these drugs will produce an amplified, potentially more severe flush/tachycardia/hypotension reaction if alcohol is consumed concurrently. - Genetic counseling: Recommended in the context of pre-conception/family counseling primarily to inform risk communication about alcohol-related cancer risk rather than reproductive risk, since this is a common polymorphism rather than a rare severe Mendelian disorder.
Suggested NCIT terms: NCIT:C15240 (Genetic Counseling); NCIT:C15986 (Pharmacotherapy) with therapeutic_agent bound to a CHEBI/NCIT term for disulfiram or an investigational ALDH2-activator compound class; NCIT:C49236 (Therapeutic Procedure) for behavioral alcohol-avoidance counseling.
Suggested resources: MGI (Aldh2 knockout/knock-in mouse strain records); IMPC for systematic Aldh2 phenotyping data, if available.
hgnc:404 (ALDH2), hgnc:249 (ADH1B)Checked with linkml-reference-validator 0.2.1.
| Outcome | Count |
|---|---|
| References checked | 22 |
| Resolved | 22 |
| Unresolved (possible confabulation) | 0 |
| Unverifiable | 0 |
| Quoted claims checked | 5 |
| Quoted claims found in source | 2 |
| Quoted claims not found in source | 3 |
| References weighed for topical relevance | 22 |
| On topic | 20 |
| Off topic | 0 |
Searched the abstract, any retrieved full text, and the title. A quote drawn from a part of the paper that was not retrieved will appear here too, so check before treating one as invented:
Every one of these was searched against an abstract alone, with no full text retrieved - marked abstract only below. Where full text can be fetched, re-running with it will settle them; where the source publishes only a summary to PubMed, as GeneReviews chapters do, it will not, and the quote has to be checked by hand against the chapter itself.
PMC:PMC9844601 (abstract only): "The ALDH2 rs671 GA/AA genotypes significantly reduced the risk of alcohol-induced mental disorders by 87%, alcohol dependence syndrome by 83%, and alcohol abuse by 66%."PMID:9419411 (abstract only): "Blinded genotyping showed inactive ALDH2 for 94.4% of subjects who reported always flushing... whereas 95.6% of subjects reporting that they never exhibited facial flushing had active ALDH2"DOI:10.1073/pnas.1510757112 (abstract only): "increases protein turnover and promotes murine hepatocarcinogenesis"