Tumor Microenvironment Modeling

Note (2026-08-28): the Metastatic_* entries named in this project were folded into their histologic parent entries per design decisions §3a (Metastatic_NSCLC → Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Metastatic_Colorectal_Cancer → Colon Adenocarcinoma, Metastatic_Pancreatic_Adenocarcinoma → Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Metastatic_Renal_Cell_Carcinoma → Renal Cell Carcinoma). Historical tables below retain the old names.

Tumor Microenvironment Modeling

Overview

Explore how dismech's structured mechanism models can serve as a knowledge substrate for computational tumor microenvironment (TME) modeling, especially multiscale agent-based simulators, reinforcement-learning-guided therapy optimization, and cancer digital twin frameworks.

The core idea is straightforward: dismech already encodes disease mechanisms as cell types, biological processes, and downstream causal effects. Those graphs are close to the rule systems that agent-based tumor simulators need, but they are currently optimized for human-readable disease explanation rather than for machine-actionable simulation. This project asks what is missing to bridge that gap.

STATUS

Scientific Thesis

Cancer outcome depends on the interaction of four layers:

  1. Tumor cells
  2. The immune microenvironment
  3. The stromal microenvironment
  4. The systemic macroenvironment

The working thesis for this project is that tumor-targeted monotherapy fails because genomic and epigenomic instability generate resistance heterogeneity faster than tolerable tumor-cell-only drug combinations can suppress it. Therapeutic strategy therefore has to shift from "kill the clone" to "re-engineer the ecosystem."

Three motivating principles:

  1. Tumor heterogeneity creates heterogeneous treatment response and resistance that cannot be managed with tumor-targeted combinations alone.
  2. Drugs aimed at tumor cells also reshape immune, stromal, and systemic environments, sometimes in pro-tumor and sometimes in anti-tumor directions.
  3. Better efficacy and tolerability should come from combination strategies that jointly target tumor cell state, the TME, and the macroenvironment to push the whole system toward a globally anti-tumor equilibrium.

Why dismech Fits This Problem

dismech is already closer to simulator-ready knowledge than a literature review or pathway diagram:

In other words, dismech can potentially become the mechanistic prior layer that many TME simulators currently hand-author.

Existing dismech Anchors

Asset Why it matters for this project
kb/disorders/Colon_Adenocarcinoma.yaml Baseline tumor-intrinsic CRC entry; useful control case for what is currently tumor-centric
kb/disorders/MSI_High_Colorectal_Cancer.yaml Already models inflamed CRC biology and conforms to immune_checkpoint_blockade
kb/disorders/Metastatic_Colorectal_Cancer.yaml Already mentions angiogenesis, stromal cooperation, hepatic seed-and-soil biology
kb/disorders/BRAF_V600E_Mutant_Colorectal_Cancer.yaml and kb/disorders/HER2_Positive_Colorectal_Cancer.yaml Existing molecular subtype coverage enables subtype-specific TME extension rather than starting from scratch
kb/modules/immune_checkpoint_blockade.yaml Direct precedent for a reusable tumor-immune mechanism module
kb/modules/fibrotic_response.yaml Strong precedent for a cross-disease conserved module with organ-specific substitution in conforming entries

CRC is therefore the natural pilot. The KB already has subtype-level disease coverage, at least one explicit tumor-immune module, and a metastatic entry that starts to gesture toward stromal and vascular ecology.

Active Computational Landscape

Approach What it contributes Why it matters to dismech
PhysiCell and recent PhysiGym work Large-scale 3D agent-based multicellular simulation, now with a Gymnasium-style RL bridge dismech mechanism graphs could seed cell-cell interaction rules instead of writing them manually
GigaTIME Virtual multiplex immunofluorescence from routine H&E at population scale Solves TME state initialization and cohort-scale observation, not causal forward simulation
TumorTwin and the broader Computational Cancer Community Modular patient-specific digital twin infrastructure and NCI-DOE ecosystem building dismech could supply curated mechanistic priors and reusable disease modules into digital twin pipelines
M4RL Multiscale mathematical model-informed RL for glioblastoma treatment scheduling Shows that therapy optimization becomes more powerful once tumor-TME dynamics are explicit
SMMART Serial biopsies and multi-omic analysis of treatment-driven tumor ecosystem adaptation Supplies the empirical framing: tumors and their ecosystems adapt under therapy, so simulators need dynamic, not static, mechanism rules

Gap Analysis for Current CRC Coverage

The existing colorectal entries are a strong start, but they are not yet rich enough to drive TME simulation without substantial hand engineering.

Dimension Current dismech CRC coverage Major gaps for TME modeling
Tumor-intrinsic programs Strong: APC/WNT, KRAS/BRAF, HER2, MSI, metastasis Needs tighter linkage from tumor genotype to secreted factors and phenotype switching
Adaptive immunity Moderate: MSI-high CRC already models CD8 T-cell response and PD-L1-mediated adaptive resistance Missing dendritic cell priming, Treg suppression, NK-cell activity, antigen presentation failure, immune exclusion states
Myeloid compartment Weak Need TAMs, MDSCs, neutrophils, inflammatory monocytes, cytokine loops, macrophage polarization logic
Stromal compartment Weak to moderate: metastatic CRC mentions stromal cooperation and CAF-like support Need explicit CAF states, ECM remodeling, stiffness, TGF-beta loops, fibroblast-immune crosstalk
Vasculature and hypoxia Weak to moderate: metastatic CRC includes angiogenesis Need endothelial cells, pericytes, perfusion failure, VEGF signaling, hypoxia-driven phenotype change
Metabolic suppression Minimal Need lactate, adenosine, glutamine competition, acidification, macrophage/T-cell metabolic rewiring
Spatial organization Minimal Need invasive margin vs core, immune-excluded vs inflamed vs desert states, liver metastatic niche geography
Macroenvironment Minimal Need microbiome, obesity/metabolic inflammation, liver systemic tolerance, bone marrow myelopoiesis, circulating mediators

Immediate CRC priorities

  1. Add explicit immune suppressor and stromal effector cell types to the colorectal entries: CAFs, TAMs, MDSCs, Tregs, endothelial cells, pericytes.
  2. Add missing processes that are central to simulator behavior: angiogenesis, hypoxia response, extracellular matrix remodeling, leukocyte trafficking, metabolic competition, and immune exclusion.
  3. Represent organ-specific metastatic ecology in metastatic CRC, especially the liver niche, rather than treating metastasis as a tumor-cell-only phenotype.
  4. Capture subtype-specific TME distinctions instead of one generic CRC environment. MSI-high, BRAF-mutant, HER2-positive, and metastatic CRC should not share the same default ecosystem logic.

Proposed tumor_ecosystem Module

This should be a reusable mechanism module in kb/modules/ using the same schema as existing disorder entries.

Design principles

  1. Keep the module generic enough to reuse across solid tumors.
  2. Let conforming entries substitute organ- and tumor-specific cell types.
  3. Reuse existing module nodes where possible instead of duplicating them.
  4. Separate minimal conserved logic from disease-specific specialization.

Candidate conserved nodes

Node Role Typical actors
Tumor Cell Diversification and Plasticity trigger tumor cell, cancer stem-like cell
Antigenicity and Immune Priming early immune engagement tumor cell, dendritic cell, CD8 T cell
Adaptive Immune Resistance conserved immune evasion tumor cell, exhausted T cell
Myeloid Recruitment and Immunosuppression amplifier TAM, MDSC, neutrophil
Stromal Activation and ECM Remodeling amplifier CAF, fibroblast, myofibroblast-like stromal cell
Angiogenesis and Hypoxic Adaptation amplifier endothelial cell, pericyte, tumor cell
Metabolic Competition and Immunosuppressive Metabolites amplifier tumor cell, T cell, macrophage
Spatial Exclusion / Barrier Formation state-shaping CAF, endothelial cell, ECM, T cell
Metastatic Niche Conditioning dissemination support tumor cell, organ-resident stromal/immune cells
Macroenvironmental Reinforcement systemic feedback bone marrow, liver, microbiome-linked immune tone, circulating cytokines

Relationship to existing modules

Export Format for Agent-Based Models and Digital Twins

Raw triples are necessary but not sufficient.

The claim-extraction roadmap in issue #1100 is important because it should produce machine-queryable statements such as:

(cell_type_A, process_X, cell_type_B)

However, a simulator needs more than that. It also needs direction, sign, conditions, spatial scope, and action semantics.

  1. Claim triples Minimal extraction layer for indexing and search.
  2. Rule objects Simulator-neutral mechanism objects with enough fields to execute or compile.
  3. Backend adapters Translators from the neutral rule objects into PhysiCell, TumorTwin, or other framework-specific inputs.

Minimal simulator-neutral rule schema

{
  "disease": "MSI_High_Colorectal_Cancer",
  "module_node": "immune_checkpoint_blockade#Adaptive Immune Resistance",
  "source_cell_type": "tumor cell",
  "signal_or_process": "PD-L1 upregulation",
  "target_cell_type": "CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell",
  "target_process": "T cell mediated cytotoxicity",
  "effect": "decrease",
  "context": {
    "anatomical_site": "colon tumor",
    "spatial_region": "tumor-immune interface",
    "disease_subtype": "MSI-high"
  },
  "evidence_weight": "high",
  "references": ["PMID:38762484"]
}

What a PhysiCell-style importer would need

Key point

dismech does not need to become the simulator. It needs to become the mechanistic interchange layer between curation and simulation.

Key References

Candidate Diseases for Expansion Beyond CRC

Disease Why TME enrichment is especially valuable
Pancreatic_Ductal_Adenocarcinoma.yaml and Metastatic_Pancreatic_Adenocarcinoma.yaml Canonical desmoplastic, CAF-rich, immune-excluded tumor ecosystem
Glioblastoma_IDH_Wildtype.yaml Direct fit for M4RL-style TAM-driven scheduling models and TumorTwin-style digital twins
Hepatocellular_Carcinoma.yaml Strong interplay among tumor cells, fibrosis, angiogenesis, and the tolerogenic liver macroenvironment
Non-Small_Cell_Lung_Cancer.yaml, EGFR_Mutant_NSCLC.yaml, KRAS_G12C_Mutant_NSCLC.yaml, Metastatic_NSCLC.yaml Mature immunotherapy and targeted-therapy landscape with clear TME-mediated response heterogeneity
Triple_Negative_Breast_Cancer.yaml and HER2_Positive_Breast_Cancer.yaml Strong SMMART relevance and rich literature on subtype-specific immune and stromal response states
Ovarian_High-Grade_Serous_Carcinoma.yaml Ascites, mesothelial interaction, immune dysfunction, and metastatic niche biology are central
Clear_Cell_Renal_Cell_Carcinoma.yaml and Metastatic_Renal_Cell_Carcinoma.yaml Angiogenesis and immunotherapy are already central clinical levers, making ecosystem modeling highly actionable

Deliverables This Project Should Produce

  1. A TME gap-analysis rubric for cancer entries in dismech
  2. A reusable tumor_ecosystem mechanism module
  3. A simulator-neutral interaction rule export format
  4. A CRC pilot that shows the curation-to-simulation workflow end to end
  5. A short list of next cancers where TME enrichment has the highest payoff

Notes

2026-04-12

Project created to evaluate dismech as a mechanistic layer for tumor ecosystem modeling.

Key observations:

  1. CRC is the right pilot because the KB already contains a spectrum from baseline adenocarcinoma to MSI-high immune-responsive disease to metastatic seed-and-soil biology.
  2. The existing immune_checkpoint_blockade module is already a genuine TME module, just a narrow one centered on adaptive immune resistance.
  3. The biggest missing piece is not literature volume but representation: simulators need explicit actors, signals, states, and spatial context.
  4. GigaTIME-like systems can help initialize or infer TME state from routine pathology, while PhysiCell, M4RL, and digital twin frameworks can use dismech-derived rules for forward simulation and intervention search.
  5. The project should treat raw claim triples as an intermediate product, not the final export. Executable simulation rules need richer structure.
  6. First high-confidence attachable PhysiCell anchors for dismech are already available in the official grammar_samples release: epi_caf_invasion and pdac_therapy for PDAC, plus tumor_immune_base and tumor_immune_extended as reusable tumor-immune exemplars.