Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer is a distinct molecular subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma characterized by clonal EBV infection of tumor cells, extreme CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-high), frequent PIK3CA mutations, and JAK2/PD-L1/PD-L2 amplifications. EBV-positive gastric cancers comprise approximately 9% of all gastric cancers worldwide and show unique features including prominent lymphoid infiltration, better prognosis than other subtypes, and potential responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The viral oncoproteins LMP1, LMP2A, and EBNA1 drive epigenetic reprogramming and survival signaling in infected epithelial cells.
Ask a research question about EBV-Associated Gastric Cancer. OpenScientist will conduct autonomous deep research using the Disorder Mechanisms Knowledge Base and PubMed literature (typically 10-30 minutes).
Do not include personal health information in your question. Questions and results are cached in your browser's local storage.
name: EBV-Associated Gastric Cancer
creation_date: '2026-01-26T02:55:13Z'
updated_date: '2026-04-22T20:13:21Z'
description: >-
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer is a distinct molecular subtype
of gastric adenocarcinoma characterized by clonal EBV infection of tumor cells,
extreme CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-high), frequent PIK3CA mutations,
and JAK2/PD-L1/PD-L2 amplifications. EBV-positive gastric cancers comprise approximately
9% of all gastric cancers worldwide and show unique features including prominent
lymphoid infiltration, better prognosis than other subtypes, and potential responsiveness
to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The viral oncoproteins LMP1, LMP2A, and EBNA1 drive
epigenetic reprogramming and survival signaling in infected epithelial cells.
categories:
- Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Virus-Associated Cancer
- Solid Tumor
parents:
- gastric cancer
infectious_agent:
- name: Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)
infectious_agent_term:
preferred_term: Human gammaherpesvirus 4
term:
id: NCBITaxon:10376
label: Human gammaherpesvirus 4
description: >-
Clonal EBV infection of gastric epithelial cells is the initiating event.
Unlike EBV lymphomas where infection occurs in B cells, EBV gastric cancer
involves epithelial cell tropism. The virus establishes latent infection
(type I/II latency) with expression of EBNA1, LMP2A, and EBERs, with variable
LMP1 expression. EBV-encoded oncoproteins drive epigenetic reprogramming and
activate survival signaling pathways.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:41280003
reference_title: "Integrated transcriptomic and methylome analysis reveals retinoic acid pathway activation after decitabine treatment in EBV associated gastric cancer."
supports: PARTIAL
snippet: Epstein-Barr virus associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) accounts for ~9-10% of gastric cancers worldwide and is defined by a distinctive molecular profile, including extreme hypermethylation of the DNA.
explanation: Supports EBV association and molecular distinctness, but does not directly establish clonal infection as the initiating event.
pathophysiology:
- name: EBV Latent Infection of Gastric Epithelium
description: >-
EBV establishes clonal latent infection in gastric epithelial cells, expressing
a restricted set of latent genes including EBNA1 (required for viral genome
maintenance), LMP2A (mimics B-cell receptor signaling), and non-coding EBERs.
LMP1 expression is variable but when present activates NF-kappaB and MAPK pathways.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: epithelial cell
term:
id: CL:0000066
label: epithelial cell
locations:
- preferred_term: stomach
term:
id: UBERON:0000945
label: stomach
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: viral transcription
term:
id: GO:0019083
label: viral transcription
downstream:
- target: Epigenetic Reprogramming and CIMP-High Phenotype
description: EBV infection induces massive DNA methylation changes
- target: PI3K-AKT Pathway Activation
description: LMP2A signaling and PIK3CA mutations activate survival pathways
- name: Epigenetic Reprogramming and CIMP-High Phenotype
description: >-
EBV-associated gastric cancer displays the most extreme CpG island methylator
phenotype (CIMP) of any cancer type. EBV-encoded proteins, particularly LMP2A,
induce aberrant DNA methylation leading to silencing of tumor suppressor genes
including CDKN2A (p16), CDH1 (E-cadherin), and MLH1. This epigenetic reprogramming
is a hallmark feature distinguishing EBV-positive from EBV-negative gastric cancers.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:25079317
reference_title: "Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "EBV-positive tumours had a higher prevalence of DNA hypermethylation than any cancers reported by TCGA"
explanation: TCGA confirmed that EBV-positive gastric cancers exhibit the most extreme CIMP-high methylation phenotype across all cancers profiled.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: DNA methylation
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0006304
label: DNA modification
downstream:
- target: Tumor Suppressor Gene Silencing
description: CDKN2A, CDH1, and other tumor suppressors are silenced by promoter methylation
- name: PI3K-AKT Pathway Activation
description: >-
PIK3CA mutations occur in approximately 80% of EBV-positive gastric cancers,
the highest frequency of any gastric cancer subtype. Combined with LMP2A signaling
which activates PI3K through mimicry of B-cell receptor signaling, this leads
to constitutive AKT activation promoting cell survival and proliferation.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:25079317
reference_title: "Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "non-silent PIK3CA mutations found in 80% of this subgroup"
explanation: TCGA reports non-silent PIK3CA mutations in 80% of EBV-positive gastric cancers, the highest rate of any subgroup.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: signal transduction
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0007165
label: signal transduction
downstream:
- target: Uncontrolled Cell Proliferation
description: PI3K-AKT signaling promotes cell survival and growth
- name: Tumor Suppressor Gene Silencing
description: >-
Promoter hypermethylation silences multiple tumor suppressor genes. CDKN2A
(p16INK4A) silencing removes G1/S checkpoint control. CDH1 (E-cadherin) silencing
promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Unlike other gastric cancer subtypes,
TP53 mutations are rare in EBV-positive tumors.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:25079317
reference_title: "Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma."
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "All EBV-positive tumours assayed displayed CDKN2A (p16INK4A) promoter hypermethylation"
explanation: Universal CDKN2A promoter hypermethylation in EBV-positive gastric cancers epigenetically silences this tumor suppressor and removes G1/S checkpoint control.
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: cell cycle checkpoint signaling
modifier: DECREASED
term:
id: GO:0000075
label: cell cycle checkpoint signaling
- name: Uncontrolled Cell Proliferation
description: >-
Combined effects of PI3K-AKT activation, tumor suppressor silencing, and viral
oncogene expression drive uncontrolled proliferation of infected gastric epithelial
cells, leading to tumor formation.
cell_types:
- preferred_term: epithelial cell
term:
id: CL:0000066
label: epithelial cell
biological_processes:
- preferred_term: cell population proliferation
modifier: INCREASED
term:
id: GO:0008283
label: cell population proliferation
histopathology:
- name: Gastric Adenocarcinoma
finding_term:
preferred_term: Gastric Adenocarcinoma
term:
id: NCIT:C4004
label: Gastric Adenocarcinoma
frequency: VERY_FREQUENT
description: Adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic type of gastric cancer.
evidence:
- reference: PMID:40647518
reference_title: "A Histopathological and Surgical Analysis of Gastric Cancer: A Two-Year Experience in a Single Center."
supports: PARTIAL
snippet: "with adenocarcinoma being the most "
explanation: Supports adenocarcinoma predominance in gastric cancer generally, but not specifically in EBV-associated cases.
phenotypes:
- category: Gastrointestinal
name: Abdominal Pain
frequency: FREQUENT
description: >-
Epigastric pain is a common presenting symptom, often initially attributed
to dyspepsia or gastritis.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Abdominal pain
term:
id: HP:0002027
label: Abdominal pain
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38966500
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Weight loss and persistent abdominal pain are the most common symptoms at initial diagnosis."
explanation: >-
Clinical features review identifies persistent abdominal pain as
one of the two most common symptoms of gastric cancer at initial
diagnosis, supporting its inclusion as a frequent phenotype in
EBV-associated gastric cancer (a molecular subtype of gastric
adenocarcinoma).
- category: Constitutional
name: Weight Loss
frequency: FREQUENT
description: >-
Unintentional weight loss occurs due to decreased appetite and metabolic
effects of malignancy.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Weight loss
term:
id: HP:0001824
label: Weight loss
evidence:
- reference: PMID:38966500
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Weight loss and persistent abdominal pain are the most common symptoms at initial diagnosis."
explanation: >-
Clinical features review identifies weight loss as one of the two
most common symptoms of gastric cancer at initial diagnosis,
supporting its inclusion as a frequent constitutional phenotype.
- category: Constitutional
name: Fatigue
frequency: FREQUENT
description: >-
Generalized fatigue related to chronic disease and often anemia from
occult gastrointestinal blood loss.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Fatigue
term:
id: HP:0012378
label: Fatigue
evidence:
- reference: PMID:29266530
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "The incidence of clinically relevant fatigue among patients with gastric cancer was 91.6%."
explanation: >-
Cross-sectional study of 203 gastric cancer patients found a
91.6% incidence of clinically relevant fatigue, supporting its
inclusion as a frequent phenotype in gastric cancer.
- category: Hematologic
name: Anemia
frequency: FREQUENT
description: >-
Iron deficiency anemia from chronic gastrointestinal blood loss is common.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Anemia
term:
id: HP:0001903
label: Anemia
evidence:
- reference: PMID:30179903
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: "Only 18.3% of patients had a self-reported history of IDA, 40% had IDA at the time of gastric cancer diagnosis, and 58.7% were anemic."
explanation: >-
Retrospective Canadian review of 126 gastric cancer patients
quantifies the high prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (40%)
and anemia overall (58.7%) at diagnosis, supporting anemia as
a frequent phenotype.
- category: Abdominal
name: Hepatomegaly
frequency: OCCASIONAL
description: >-
Liver enlargement may indicate metastatic disease.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Hepatomegaly
term:
id: HP:0002240
label: Hepatomegaly
- category: Lymphatic
name: Lymphadenopathy
frequency: OCCASIONAL
description: >-
Regional lymph node enlargement occurs with local spread.
phenotype_term:
preferred_term: Lymphadenopathy
term:
id: HP:0002716
label: Lymphadenopathy
biochemical:
- name: EBV-Encoded Small RNAs (EBERs)
notes: >-
In situ hybridization for EBERs is the gold standard for diagnosing EBV-associated
gastric cancer. EBERs are abundantly expressed non-coding RNAs present in all
EBV latency programs and serve as reliable markers of EBV infection.
- name: PD-L1/PD-L2 Expression
notes: >-
JAK2/PD-L1/PD-L2 amplification at 9p24.1 is characteristic of EBV-positive
gastric cancer, leading to high PD-L1 expression and potential responsiveness
to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
genetic:
- name: PIK3CA
association: Somatic Mutation
notes: >-
PIK3CA mutations occur in approximately 80% of EBV-positive gastric cancers,
the highest rate among gastric cancer subtypes. Hotspot mutations in the
helical (E545K) and kinase (H1047R) domains activate PI3K signaling.
- name: ARID1A
association: Somatic Mutation
notes: >-
ARID1A mutations occur in approximately 55% of EBV-positive gastric cancers,
contributing to chromatin remodeling dysfunction.
- name: CDKN2A
association: Epigenetically Silenced
notes: >-
CDKN2A (p16INK4A) is silenced by promoter hypermethylation rather than
mutation in EBV-positive gastric cancer, removing G1/S checkpoint control.
treatments:
- name: Surgical Resection
description: >-
Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the primary treatment for
localized disease. EBV-positive tumors have relatively favorable prognosis
compared to other molecular subtypes.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: surgical procedure
term:
id: MAXO:0000004
label: surgical procedure
- name: Chemotherapy
description: >-
Perioperative or palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine-based
regimens (FOLFOX, CAPOX) is standard for advanced disease.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: chemotherapy
term:
id: MAXO:0000647
label: chemotherapy
- name: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
description: >-
EBV-positive gastric cancers show high expression of PD-L1 due to 9p24.1
amplification and strong immune infiltration, making them potentially
responsive to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab.
This represents a molecularly-targeted approach based on the unique
immunobiology of this subtype.
treatment_term:
preferred_term: immunotherapy
term:
id: NCIT:C15262
label: Immunotherapy
disease_term:
preferred_term: gastric cancer
term:
id: MONDO:0001056
label: gastric cancer
classifications:
icdo_morphology:
classification_value: Adenocarcinoma
harrisons_chapter:
- classification_value: cancer
- classification_value: solid tumor
references:
- reference: DOI:10.1007/s10120-021-01215-3
title: Landscape of EBV-positive gastric cancer
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Landscape of EBV-positive gastric cancer
supporting_text: Landscape of EBV-positive gastric cancer
- reference: DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-45930-6
title: Genetic landscape and PD-L1 expression in Epstein–Barr virus-associated gastric cancer according to the histological pattern
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of gastric cancer.
supporting_text: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of gastric cancer.
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-45930-6
reference_title: Genetic landscape and PD-L1 expression in Epstein–Barr virus-associated gastric cancer according to the histological pattern
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of gastric cancer.
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
- reference: DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6
title: Association of PD-L1 positivity with Epstein Barr virus infection and microsatellite instability in gastric carcinomas with lymphoid stroma
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Association of PD-L1 positivity with Epstein Barr virus infection and microsatellite instability in gastric carcinomas with lymphoid stroma
supporting_text: Association of PD-L1 positivity with Epstein Barr virus infection and microsatellite instability in gastric carcinomas with lymphoid stroma
- reference: DOI:10.1097/cji.0000000000000316
title: 'Positive Status of Epstein-Barr Virus as a Biomarker for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study'
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Immunotherapy has exhibited promising but controversial results in gastric cancer; determining criteria for choosing the appropriate target population is still problematic.
supporting_text: Immunotherapy has exhibited promising but controversial results in gastric cancer; determining criteria for choosing the appropriate target population is still problematic.
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.1097/cji.0000000000000316
reference_title: 'Positive Status of Epstein-Barr Virus as a Biomarker for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Immunotherapy has exhibited promising but controversial results in gastric cancer; determining criteria for choosing the appropriate target population is still problematic.
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
- reference: DOI:10.1136/jitc-2021-004080
title: Efficacy and predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (GC) (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of GC with a favorable prognosis.
supporting_text: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (GC) (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of GC with a favorable prognosis.
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.1136/jitc-2021-004080
reference_title: Efficacy and predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (GC) (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of GC with a favorable prognosis.
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
- reference: DOI:10.1136/jitc-2024-010201
title: 'Immune microenvironment of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative compared to EBV-associated gastric cancers: implications for immunotherapy'
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Gastric carcinomas (GC) are aggressive malignancies, and only ~15% of patients respond to anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) monotherapy.
supporting_text: Gastric carcinomas (GC) are aggressive malignancies, and only ~15% of patients respond to anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) monotherapy.
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.1136/jitc-2024-010201
reference_title: 'Immune microenvironment of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative compared to EBV-associated gastric cancers: implications for immunotherapy'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Gastric carcinomas (GC) are aggressive malignancies, and only ~15% of patients respond to anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) monotherapy.
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
- reference: DOI:10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9
title: 'Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications'
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) was a unique molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC).
supporting_text: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) was a unique molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC).
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9
reference_title: 'Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) was a unique molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC).
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
- reference: DOI:10.21037/jgo-24-345
title: Development of a streamlined NGS-based TCGA classification scheme for gastric cancer and its implications for personalized therapy
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Development of a streamlined NGS-based TCGA classification scheme for gastric cancer and its implications for personalized therapy
supporting_text: Development of a streamlined NGS-based TCGA classification scheme for gastric cancer and its implications for personalized therapy
- reference: DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1358511
title: The viral etiology of EBV-associated gastric cancers contributes to their unique pathology, clinical outcomes, treatment responses and immune landscape
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a pathogen known to cause a number of malignancies, often taking years for them to develop after primary infection.
supporting_text: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a pathogen known to cause a number of malignancies, often taking years for them to develop after primary infection.
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1358511
reference_title: The viral etiology of EBV-associated gastric cancers contributes to their unique pathology, clinical outcomes, treatment responses and immune landscape
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a pathogen known to cause a number of malignancies, often taking years for them to develop after primary infection.
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
- reference: DOI:10.3390/cancers16112000
title: 'Epstein–Barr Virus and Clinico-Endoscopic Characteristics of Gastric Remnant Cancers Compared to Proximal Non-Remnant Cancers: A Population-Based Study'
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is associated with 5–10% of gastric cancers and is recognized as a distinct molecular subtype.
supporting_text: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is associated with 5–10% of gastric cancers and is recognized as a distinct molecular subtype.
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.3390/cancers16112000
reference_title: 'Epstein–Barr Virus and Clinico-Endoscopic Characteristics of Gastric Remnant Cancers Compared to Proximal Non-Remnant Cancers: A Population-Based Study'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is associated with 5–10% of gastric cancers and is recognized as a distinct molecular subtype.
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
- reference: DOI:10.3390/medicina59050834
title: 'Prognostic Implication of EBV Infection in Gastric Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: and This study aims to elucidate the prognostic implications of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection in gastric carcinomas (GCs) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
supporting_text: and This study aims to elucidate the prognostic implications of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection in gastric carcinomas (GCs) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.3390/medicina59050834
reference_title: 'Prognostic Implication of EBV Infection in Gastric Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: OTHER
snippet: and This study aims to elucidate the prognostic implications of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection in gastric carcinomas (GCs) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
- reference: DOI:10.3390/pathogens13090728
title: 'Unlocking the Potential: Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) in Gastric Cancer and Future Treatment Prospects, a Literature Review'
found_in:
- EBV_Associated_Gastric_Cancer-deep-research-falcon.md
findings:
- statement: Gastric cancer (GC) is a complex disease with various etiologies.
supporting_text: Gastric cancer (GC) is a complex disease with various etiologies.
evidence:
- reference: DOI:10.3390/pathogens13090728
reference_title: 'Unlocking the Potential: Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) in Gastric Cancer and Future Treatment Prospects, a Literature Review'
supports: SUPPORT
evidence_source: HUMAN_CLINICAL
snippet: Gastric cancer (GC) is a complex disease with various etiologies.
explanation: Deep research cited this publication as relevant literature for EBV Associated Gastric Cancer.
Question: You are an expert researcher providing comprehensive, well-cited information.
Provide detailed information focusing on: 1. Key concepts and definitions with current understanding 2. Recent developments and latest research (prioritize 2023-2024 sources) 3. Current applications and real-world implementations 4. Expert opinions and analysis from authoritative sources 5. Relevant statistics and data from recent studies
Format as a comprehensive research report with proper citations. Include URLs and publication dates where available. Always prioritize recent, authoritative sources and provide specific citations for all major claims.
Please provide a comprehensive research report on EBV-Associated Gastric Cancer covering all of the disease characteristics listed below. This report will be used to populate a disease knowledge base entry. Be thorough and cite primary literature (PMID preferred) for all claims.
For each section, suggested databases/resources are listed. These are the first places you should search for information on each topic.
Search first: OMIM, Orphanet, ICD-10/ICD-11, MeSH, PubMed
Search first: PubMed, Cochrane Library, UpToDate, clinical guidelines, ClinVar, ClinGen, GWAS Catalog, PheGenI, CTD, CDC, WHO, epidemiological databases
Search first: PubMed, Cochrane Library, clinical trial databases, GWAS Catalog, gnomAD, WHO, CDC, nutrition databases
Search first: CTD, PubMed, PheGenI, GxE databases
Search first: HPO (Human Phenotype Ontology), OMIM, Orphanet, PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, MedDRA, SNOMED CT, DECIPHER, LOINC
For each phenotype, provide: - Phenotype type: symptoms, clinical signs, physical manifestations, behavioral changes, or laboratory abnormalities
For symptoms/signs: HPO, OMIM, Orphanet, PubMed For behavioral changes: HPO, DSM, RDoC (Research Domain Criteria), PubMed For laboratory abnormalities: LOINC, SNOMED CT, LabTests Online, PubMed - Phenotype characteristics: Search first: OMIM, Orphanet, HPO, PubMed - Age of symptom onset (neonatal, childhood, adult-onset, late-onset) - Symptom severity (mild, moderate, severe, variable) - Symptom progression (stable, progressive, episodic, fluctuating) - Frequency among affected individuals (percentage or qualitative) - Quality of life impact: Effects on daily functioning and well-being (per-phenotype when possible) Search first: EQ-5D database, SF-36, WHO QOL databases, PubMed - Suggest HPO (Human Phenotype Ontology) terms for each phenotype
Search first: OMIM, ClinVar, HGMD, Ensembl, NCBI Gene
Search first: ENCODE, Roadmap Epigenomics, MethBase, DiseaseMeth
Search first: DECIPHER, ClinVar, ECARUCA, UCSC Genome Browser
Search first: CTD (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database), TOXNET, PubMed, EPA databases
Search first: CDC databases, WHO, PubMed, NHANES
Search first: NCBI Taxonomy, ViPR, BV-BRC, MicrobeDB, GIDEON
Search first: KEGG, Reactome, WikiPathways, PathBank, BioCyc
Search first: Gene Ontology (GO), Reactome, KEGG, PubMed
Search first: UniProt, PDB (Protein Data Bank), InterPro, Pfam, AlphaFold
Search first: KEGG, BioCyc, HMDB (Human Metabolome Database), BRENDA
Search first: ImmPort, Immunome Database, IEDB, Gene Ontology
Search first: PubMed, Gene Ontology, Reactome
Search first: BRENDA, UniProt, KEGG, OMIM, PubMed
Search first: ENCODE, Roadmap Epigenomics, MethBase, DiseaseMeth
For each mechanism, describe: - The causal chain from initial trigger to clinical manifestation - Which mechanisms are upstream vs downstream - What cell types and biological processes are involved - Suggest GO terms for biological processes and CL terms for cell types
Search first: Uberon, FMA (Foundational Model of Anatomy), OMIM, HPO, ICD-11, MeSH, SNOMED CT
Search first: Uberon, Human Protein Atlas, Cell Ontology, Human Cell Atlas, CellMarker, PanglaoDB
Search first: Gene Ontology (Cellular Component), UniProt, Human Protein Atlas
Search first: OMIM, Orphanet, HPO, PubMed
Search first: Disease registries, longitudinal cohort databases, natural history studies, PubMed, Orphanet, OMIM
Search first: Orphanet, CDC, WHO, GBD (Global Burden of Disease), national registries, SEER, disease registries
Search first: GTR (Genetic Testing Registry), GeneReviews, ClinGen
For each treatment, suggest MAXO (Medical Action Ontology) terms where applicable.
Search first: CDC vaccine schedules, WHO immunization, FDA vaccine database
Search first: CDC, WHO, behavioral intervention databases, Cochrane Library
Search first: NSGC resources, ACMG guidelines, GeneReviews
Search first: Clinical guidelines, FDA approvals, PubMed
Search first: NCBI Taxonomy
Search first: VBO (Vertebrate Breed Ontology)
Search first: NCBI Gene
Structure your response as a comprehensive narrative organized by the sections above. For each section, provide: - Factual content with specific details (numbers, percentages, gene names, variant nomenclature) - Ontology term suggestions (HPO, GO, CL, UBERON, CHEBI, MAXO, MONDO) where applicable - Evidence citations with PMIDs - Direct quotes from abstracts to support key claims - Clear indication when information is not available or not applicable for this disease
This report will be used to populate a disease knowledge base entry with: - Pathophysiology descriptions with causal chains - Gene/protein annotations (HGNC, GO terms) - Phenotype associations (HP terms) with frequencies - Cell type involvement (CL terms) - Anatomical locations (UBERON terms) - Chemical entities (CHEBI terms) - Treatment annotations (MAXO terms) - Evidence items with PMIDs and exact abstract quotes - Epidemiology, prognosis, diagnostic, and prevention information - Animal model descriptions with phenotype recapitulation details
EBV-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a molecularly and clinicopathologically distinct subset of gastric cancer defined by the presence of EBV infection within the malignant epithelial (tumor) cells, typically demonstrated by in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBER) (saito2021landscapeofebvpositive pages 1-2, li2023assessingepstein–barrvirus pages 1-2). It is recognized as one of the major molecular subtypes in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) gastric cancer classification (saito2021landscapeofebvpositive pages 1-2, lee2024associationofpdl1 pages 1-2).
The information in this report is derived from aggregated disease-level primary literature (cohort studies, meta-analyses, and mechanistic studies), plus a small number of prospective/observational immunotherapy cohorts and clinical trial registry entries (xie2020positivestatusof pages 1-2, bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2, pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2).
EBVaGC is causally linked to EBV infection of gastric epithelial cells with maintenance of EBV genomes/latency-associated gene expression in tumor cells; EBVaGC is considered an “infection-associated” cancer subtype with distinct molecular/immune features (salnikov2024theviraletiology pages 1-2).
A meta-analysis suggests EBV-positive status is associated with better overall survival compared to EBV-negative gastric cancer (HR < 1), which is prognostic rather than strictly protective against disease occurrence (pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2).
Direct gene–environment interaction statistics were not extractable from the retrieved texts. However, EBV-associated tumors show characteristic host epigenetic reprogramming (hypermethylation) and immune pathway activation, consistent with pathogen-driven remodeling of host gene regulation (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 3-5, salnikov2024theviraletiology pages 1-2).
Commonly reported features include: - Male predominance (e.g., 72.2% male in one 2023 cohort; and EBVaGC more common in males in a 420-patient cohort) (li2023assessingepstein–barrvirus pages 1-2, park2023geneticlandscapeand pages 1-2). - Tumor location: preferential involvement of upper-to-middle stomach (saito2021landscapeofebvpositive pages 1-2, park2023geneticlandscapeand pages 1-2). - Histology: frequent association with gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (GCLS) characterized by dense intra/peritumoral lymphocytic infiltration (park2023geneticlandscapeand pages 1-2, lee2024associationofpdl1 pages 1-2). - Stage associations: one cohort found association with early T stage and early TNM stage (li2023assessingepstein–barrvirus pages 1-2).
Because EBVaGC is a cancer subtype, phenotypes overlap with gastric cancer generally; the literature extracted here emphasized histology and immune infiltration. - Gastric adenocarcinoma: HP:0006753 (Malignant neoplasm of stomach; verify exact HPO term naming in curation pipeline) - Gastrointestinal bleeding (particularly in remnant cancers): HP:0002239 (artifact-00; Bringeland 2024 study context) - Weight loss/anorexia (common in GC but not quantified here): HP:0001824 (Weight loss), HP:0004396 (Anorexia) - Lymphocyte-rich tumor stroma (not a standard HPO clinical term; better captured via pathology ontologies)
EBVaGC is not a Mendelian disorder and does not have a single causal germline gene. Its defining cause is EBV infection in tumor cells, with recurrent somatic alterations.
Across genomic profiling and reviews, EBVaGC is characterized by: - PIK3CA and ARID1A recurrent mutations, and relatively fewer TP53 mutations (saito2021landscapeofebvpositive pages 1-2, guo2024developmentofa pages 1-2). - 9p24.1 amplifications including JAK2, CD274 (PD-L1), and PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2), contributing to immune evasion (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 3-5, mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2). - Extensive DNA hypermethylation (including CDKN2A promoter hypermethylation noted in TCGA summaries; MLH1 promoter hypermethylation is not a typical feature in EBV subtype as summarized in one review) (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 3-5).
One 2024 review summarized reported frequencies from prior genomic studies: PIK3CA 80%, ARID1A 55%, BCOR 23%, and JAK2/CD274/PDCD1LG2 amplifications 15% (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 3-5).
EBVaGC is notable for DNA hypermethylation compared to other gastric cancer subtypes (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 3-5).
EBVaGC’s pathophysiology is shaped by combined viral oncogenic programs, host epigenetic remodeling, and immune microenvironment remodeling.
Causal chain (conceptual): 1) EBV infects gastric epithelial cells and establishes a latency program in tumor cells (definition-level) → 2) EBV products and host responses drive epigenetic reprogramming (hypermethylation) and select for particular somatic alterations (e.g., PIK3CA/ARID1A) → 3) Tumors develop an “immune-hot” yet immunoregulatory environment, often with strong lymphocyte infiltration and immune checkpoint activation/amplification (PD-L1/PD-L2; JAK2) → 4) This immune contexture can be associated with higher responsiveness to checkpoint blockade in some cohorts, but responses are heterogeneous (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 6-8, bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2, mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2).
A 2024 JITC study comparing EBV+ vs EBV− primary gastric cancers reported: - EBVaGC background prevalence “~5–10% of GCs,” and EBV+ tumors often harbor PD-L1/PD-L2 amplifications with robust CD8+ infiltrates (mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2). - In a treatment-naïve set (11 EBV+, 14 EBV−), CD8+ T-cell densities were higher in EBV+ tumors (p=0.044) (mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2). - PD-L1+ tumor cells were observed in 3/25 tumors (all EBV+) (mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2). - EBV− tumors overexpressed inflammatory/immunosuppressive pathways including COX-2/PGE2 (PTGS2/COX-2 up 32-fold, p=0.005) (mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2).
Estimates vary by region and detection methods. - Meta-analysis (2023): EBV infection in 10.4% of gastric carcinomas (95% CI 8.2%–13.1%) (pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2). - TCGA-surrogate NGS cohort (2024): EBV subtype 5.2% (guo2024developmentofa pages 1-2). - Individual cohorts can range widely (e.g., 12.62% in one 420-patient cohort) (li2023assessingepstein–barrvirus pages 1-2).
A 2023 systematic review/meta-analysis (57 studies; 22,943 patients) found EBV positivity associated with improved overall survival: HR 0.890 (95% CI 0.816–0.970) (pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2). In diffuse-type Lauren classification, EBV positivity was associated with stronger favorable prognosis (HR 0.400, 95% CI 0.300–0.534) (pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2).
EBER in situ hybridization (EBER-ISH) is repeatedly described as the reference method for defining EBV-positive tumor status. - In a clinical cohort paper: “EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization method was used to evaluate the EBV status in GC” (li2023assessingepstein–barrvirus pages 1-2). - A 2022 immunotherapy biomarker study states EBER-ISH is “regarded as the gold standard” but has limitations for multiplex biomarker assessment (bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2).
An NGS-based EBV detection algorithm (validated against EBER-ISH) achieved sensitivity 95.7% and specificity 100%, and enabled simultaneous evaluation of clinically relevant biomarkers (TMB, MSI, HER2, fusions) (bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2).
Differential considerations include MSI-high gastric cancers (which can also have prominent immune infiltration and PD-L1 positivity) and other histologic subtypes; in lymphoid-stroma–rich tumors, MSI-H is a key alternate subtype (lee2024associationofpdl1 pages 1-2).
EBVaGC is treated within standard gastric cancer algorithms (surgery/endoscopic resection for early disease; chemotherapy ± targeted therapy; immunotherapy in selected advanced settings). EBV positivity is increasingly used as a biomarker relevant to immunotherapy selection/stratification (bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2, mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2).
Evidence suggests EBVaGC can show high response rates to ICI in some cohorts, but responses vary. - In an EBV+/pMMR cohort receiving immunotherapy, ORR 54.5% (12/22) was reported (bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2). - A prospective observational cohort of 9 stage-IV EBVaGC treated with ICIs reported: “Three patients … showed partial response, 5 stable disease” and the “longest duration of response was 18 months” (xie2020positivestatusof pages 1-2). - A 2024 review summarized heterogeneous reports with ORRs “from 0 to 100%,” including a small pembrolizumab series reported as ORR 100% (n=6; PFS 8.5 months) and a small camrelizumab series with ORR 0% (n=6; DCR 67%; PFS 2.2 months; OS 6.8 months) (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 6-8).
Trials explicitly incorporating EBV status in gastric cancer include: - NCT05970627 (Phase 2): perioperative chemotherapy + toripalimab for EBV-associated locally advanced gastric/EGJ adenocarcinoma (NOT_YET_RECRUITING) (trial retrieved in this run). - NCT03257163 (Phase 2): pembrolizumab + capecitabine + radiation in mismatch-repair deficient and EBV-positive gastric cancer (ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING) (trial retrieved in this run). - NCT05535569 (Phase Ib/II): nivolumab + paclitaxel in EBV-related/MSI-H/PD-L1+ advanced gastric cancer (COMPLETED) (trial retrieved in this run).
Direct model-system inventories (specific EBV+ gastric cancer organoids, cell lines, or mouse models) were not comprehensively extractable from the retrieved evidence set. However, EBV-associated gastric cancer is frequently studied using EBV-positive gastric cancer cell lines and xenografts in mechanistic viral-miRNA studies; for example, EBV-encoded miR-BART11-3p was shown to modulate the DUSP6–MAPK axis and promote proliferation/metastasis-related phenotypes in vitro and in vivo (xenograft context) (paper retrieved but not evidence-extracted in this run).
Key quantitative facts from recent literature are consolidated below.
| Feature | Quantitative value(s) | Study/Population | PMID (if available; otherwise DOI) | Publication date | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBVaGC prevalence, global estimate | 2%–20%; average 8.9% | Review summarizing global prevalence; EBVaGC across gastric cancers (park2023geneticlandscapeand pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45930-6 | 2023-11 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45930-6 |
| EBVaGC prevalence, single-center cohort | 53/420 = 12.62% | Li et al.; gastric cancer cohort evaluated by EBER ISH (li2023assessingepstein–barrvirus pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9 | 2023-02 | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9 |
| EBV prevalence in gastric carcinomas, meta-analysis | 10.4% (95% CI 8.2%–13.1%) | 57 studies; 22,943 patients (pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050834 | 2023-04 | https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050834 |
| EBV subtype prevalence by NGS-TCGA surrogate | 5.2% | 3DMed cohort, n=765 gastric cancers (guo2024developmentofa pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-345 | 2024-10 | https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-345 |
| EBV prevalence in gastric remnant vs proximal non-remnant controls | 18.7% vs 6.0% | Population-based Central Norway study; gastric remnant cancer vs controls | DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112000 | 2024-05 | https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112000 |
| EBVaGC prevalence, broad current estimate | ~5%–10% of gastric cancers | McMiller et al.; background statement for immune microenvironment study (mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010201 | 2024-11 | https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010201 |
| NGS-based EBV detection performance vs EBER-ISH | Sensitivity 95.7% (22/23); specificity 100% (53/53) | Bai et al.; training/validation cohorts for NGS EBV detection (bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004080 | 2022-03 | https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-004080 |
| Immunotherapy response in EBV+/pMMR advanced GC | ORR 54.5% (12/22) | Bai et al.; EBV+/pMMR patients receiving immunotherapy (bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004080 | 2022-03 | https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-004080 |
| Prospective ICI outcomes in stage IV EBVaGC | 3 PR; 5 SD; 1 non-measurable lesion with decreased ascites/tumor markers; longest response 18 months | Xie et al.; 9 stage-IV EBVaGC patients treated with ICIs (xie2020positivestatusof pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000316 | 2020-03 | https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000316 |
| Pembrolizumab in small EBVaGC cohort (reported in review) | ORR 100% (n=6); PFS 8.5 months | Kim et al. 2018, as summarized in Corallo 2024 review (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 6-8) | DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13090728 | 2024-08 | https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090728 |
| Camrelizumab in small EBVaGC cohort (reported in review) | ORR 0% (n=6); DCR 67%; PFS 2.2 months; OS 6.8 months | Phase 2 result summarized in Corallo 2024 review (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 6-8) | DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13090728 | 2024-08 | https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090728 |
| ICI disease control by molecular subtype | DCR 100% in MSI and EBV cases; 62.9% in GS; 12.5% in CIN | Korean validation cohort, n=55 (guo2024developmentofa pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-345 | 2024-10 | https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-345 |
| PD-L1 in EBV+ GCLS | CPS ≥1: 81.8%; CPS ≥5: 70.2%; CPS ≥10: 55.3% | Lee & Oh; 181 EBV+ GCLS among 214 GCLS cases (lee2024associationofpdl1 pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6 | 2024-12 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6 |
| MSI-H in GCLS by EBV status | 0.6% in EBV+ GCLS vs 54.5% in EBV− GCLS | Lee & Oh; GCLS cohort (lee2024associationofpdl1 pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6 | 2024-12 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6 |
| HER2 amplification in GCLS by EBV status | ~3.9% in EBV+ GCLS vs ~3.0% in EBV− GCLS; 13% in EBV− GAC controls | Lee & Oh; GCLS vs GAC (lee2024associationofpdl1 pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6 | 2024-12 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6 |
| CD8+ T-cell infiltration in EBV+ vs EBV− GC | Higher CD8+ density in EBV+ tumors; p=0.044 | McMiller et al.; 25 treatment-naïve specimens (11 EBV+, 14 EBV−) (mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010201 | 2024-11 | https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010201 |
| PD-L1+ tumor cells in immune microenvironment study | 3/25 tumors; all 3 were EBV+ | McMiller et al.; 25 treatment-naïve gastric cancers (mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010201 | 2024-11 | https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010201 |
| COX-2/PGE2 pathway enrichment in EBV− tumors | PTGS2/COX-2 up 32-fold (p=0.005); PTGER1 up 21-fold (p=0.015) | McMiller et al.; EBV− vs EBV+ immune microenvironment comparison (mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010201 | 2024-11 | https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010201 |
| Prognostic effect of EBV positivity | OS HR 0.890 (95% CI 0.816–0.970) | Pyo et al. meta-analysis; 57 studies, 22,943 patients (pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050834 | 2023-04 | https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050834 |
| Prognostic effect in diffuse-type Lauren classification | HR 0.400 (95% CI 0.300–0.534) | Pyo et al. subgroup analysis (pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050834 | 2023-04 | https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050834 |
| Recurrent molecular features of EBV subtype | Recurrent ARID1A and PIK3CA mutations; fewer TP53 mutations | Guo et al. NGS-based subtype classification (guo2024developmentofa pages 1-2) | DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-345 | 2024-10 | https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-345 |
| Frequent EBVaGC molecular alterations summarized in review | PIK3CA 80%; ARID1A 55%; BCOR 23%; JAK2/CD274/PDCD1LG2 amplifications 15% | Corallo 2024 review summarizing prior genomic studies (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 3-5) | DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13090728 | 2024-08 | https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090728 |
Table: This table consolidates key quantitative findings for EBV-associated gastric cancer across prevalence, molecular features, biomarkers, immune microenvironment, prognosis, and immunotherapy response. It is useful as a quick-reference evidence summary for knowledge base curation and clinical/research interpretation.
A 2024 Frontiers in Immunology review emphasizes that EBVaGC is “immunologically, molecularly and pathologically distinct” and describes an overall “immune-hot” phenotype with improved prognosis relative to EBV-negative gastric cancers (salnikov2024theviraletiology pages 1-2). A 2024 Pathogens review highlights EBV status as a potential predictive biomarker for response to chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, while emphasizing heterogeneity and the need for prospective validation (corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 6-8).
References
(saito2021landscapeofebvpositive pages 1-2): Motonobu Saito and Koji Kono. Landscape of ebv-positive gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer, 24:983-989, Jul 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01215-3, doi:10.1007/s10120-021-01215-3. This article has 92 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(li2023assessingepstein–barrvirus pages 1-2): Guanghua Li, Zhihao Zhou, Zhixiong Wang, and Zhao Wang. Assessing epstein–barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications. Infectious Agents and Cancer, Feb 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9, doi:10.1186/s13027-023-00489-9. This article has 12 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(lee2024associationofpdl1 pages 1-2): Sun Mi Lee and Hyunjoo Oh. Association of pd-l1 positivity with epstein barr virus infection and microsatellite instability in gastric carcinomas with lymphoid stroma. Scientific Reports, Dec 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6, doi:10.1038/s41598-024-81764-6. This article has 5 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(bai2022efficacyandpredictive pages 1-2): Yuezong Bai, Tong Xie, Zhenghang Wang, Shuang Tong, Xiaochen Zhao, Feilong Zhao, Jinping Cai, Xiaofan Wei, Zhi Peng, and Lin Shen. Efficacy and predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy in epstein-barr virus-associated gastric cancer. Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, 10:e004080, Mar 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-004080, doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-004080. This article has 114 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(park2023geneticlandscapeand pages 1-2): Ji Hyun Park, Hee Jin Cho, Jeonghwa Seo, Ki Bum Park, Yong Hwan Kwon, Han Ik Bae, An Na Seo, and Moonsik Kim. Genetic landscape and pd-l1 expression in epstein–barr virus-associated gastric cancer according to the histological pattern. Scientific Reports, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45930-6, doi:10.1038/s41598-023-45930-6. This article has 6 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 6-8): Salvatore Corallo, Angioletta Lasagna, Beatrice Filippi, Domiziana Alaimo, Anna Tortorella, Francesco Serra, Alessandro Vanoli, and Paolo Pedrazzoli. Unlocking the potential: epstein-barr virus (ebv) in gastric cancer and future treatment prospects, a literature review. Pathogens, 13:728, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090728, doi:10.3390/pathogens13090728. This article has 18 citations.
(xie2020positivestatusof pages 1-2): Tong Xie, Yiqiang Liu, Zhening Zhang, Xiaotian Zhang, Jifang Gong, Changsong Qi, Jian Li, Lin Shen, and Zhi Peng. Positive status of epstein-barr virus as a biomarker for gastric cancer immunotherapy: a prospective observational study. Journal of Immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997), 43:139-144, Mar 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/cji.0000000000000316, doi:10.1097/cji.0000000000000316. This article has 107 citations.
(pyo2023prognosticimplicationof pages 1-2): Jung-Soo Pyo, Nae-Yu Kim, and Dong-Wook Kang. Prognostic implication of ebv infection in gastric carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina, 59:834, Apr 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050834, doi:10.3390/medicina59050834. This article has 4 citations.
(salnikov2024theviraletiology pages 1-2): Mikhail Yuryevich Salnikov, Katelyn M. MacNeil, and J. Mymryk. The viral etiology of ebv-associated gastric cancers contributes to their unique pathology, clinical outcomes, treatment responses and immune landscape. Frontiers in Immunology, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1358511, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1358511. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(mcmiller2024immunemicroenvironmentof pages 1-2): Tracee L McMiller, Sepideh Besharati, Mark Yarchoan, Qingfeng Zhu, Keziban Ünsal-Kaçmaz, Ke Xu, Junghwa Lee, Feriyl Bhaijee, Logan L Engle, Janis M Taube, Alan E Berger, Robert A Anders, and Suzanne L Topalian. Immune microenvironment of epstein-barr virus (ebv)-negative compared to ebv-associated gastric cancers: implications for immunotherapy. Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, 12:e010201, Nov 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010201, doi:10.1136/jitc-2024-010201. This article has 7 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(corallo2024unlockingthepotential pages 3-5): Salvatore Corallo, Angioletta Lasagna, Beatrice Filippi, Domiziana Alaimo, Anna Tortorella, Francesco Serra, Alessandro Vanoli, and Paolo Pedrazzoli. Unlocking the potential: epstein-barr virus (ebv) in gastric cancer and future treatment prospects, a literature review. Pathogens, 13:728, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090728, doi:10.3390/pathogens13090728. This article has 18 citations.
(guo2024developmentofa pages 1-2): Pengda Guo, Yang Yang, Lu Wang, Yu Zhang, Bei Zhang, Jinping Cai, Fabrício Freire de Melo, Matthew R. Strickland, Min Huang, and Biao Liu. Development of a streamlined ngs-based tcga classification scheme for gastric cancer and its implications for personalized therapy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 15:2053-2066, Oct 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-345, doi:10.21037/jgo-24-345. This article has 4 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.